Mal kleinere, mal größere,

mal glatte, mal schaumige Wellen

schlagen ans Ufer.

Möwen kreischen über den Köpfen.

Mal brennt die Sonne heiß vom Himmel herab,

mal senkt sich Nebel über die Landschaft

und lässt sie vollständig darin versinken.

Mal brandet das Meer wild und laut,

mal ruht es still wie ein See. 

Im Kreislauf der Natur.

Tag für Tag.

Aufs Gleiche.

Immer aufs Neue.

Zeit-Los.

Die Zeit zwischen den Jahren beginnt damit, dass ich Zahlen an Kalenderblättern abschneide. Im Frühling habe ich mir einen Kunstkalender gekauft, den es im örtlichen Buchladen zu einem reduzierten Preis gab. 

Die Kunst ist zeitlos.

Während ich die abgeschnittene Kunst zum Gemälde von Edvard Munch “Inger am Strand” über meinem Schreibplatz hänge, sodass sich meine Schreibstube in eine kleine Galerie verwandelt, denke ich an eine Praktikantin, mit der ich vor einer Weile zusammen gearbeitet habe: eine junge Frau mit diversen Piercings und Gothic-Kleidung, die darüber nachdachte, sich eine Ratte für die Schulter anzuschaffen. 

Sie las Rilke.

Und hatte mir damit einiges voraus.

Seit meiner Reise ins Künstlerdorf #Worpswede tue ich es auch.

Sie war für mich eine Influencerin.

Was ich an Rilke mag, ist seine Vielseitigkeit. Er war ein Kosmopolit. Er ist in Prag geboren, hat Russland bereist und in Paris gelebt. Er hat zahlreiche Briefe geschrieben und sich zu Politik, Dichtung und Kunst im Allgemeinen geäussert. Er schrieb Briefe mit Ellen Key, einer skandinavischen Reformpädagogin, die durch ihr Werk “Das Jahrhundert des Kindes“ bekannt geworden ist: „Briefwechsel mit Ellen Key“. Er äusserte sich in zahlreichen Briefen zur Politik.

Wenn ich auf meine kleine Kunst-Galerie über dem Schreibplatz schaue, frage ich mich, wie es sein kann, dass diese Künstler:innen, die um die Wende des 20. Jahrhunderts einzuordnen sind, Dichter:innen und Denker:innen wie Rilke, die Frauen von Worpswede und Reformpädagoginnen wie Ellen Key, noch zu modern für unsere Zeit sein können.

Immer noch gerne Piano-Anfängerin.

Laut meiner Habit-Tracker-App, einer dieser kleinen hübschen Technologien, die mein Leben bereichern, habe ich in diesem Jahr an 322 Tagen Klavier gespielt.

Kopf und Finger sollen zusammenwirken, einen Klang erzeugen, besser noch: harmonische Klänge. Und bestenfalls sollen diese Känge Musik sein. 

Auch wenn es Tage gibt, an denen mir der Kopf raucht und die Finger einfach nicht so wollen, wie sie sollen, ist die tägliche Klavierstunde eine schöne Zeit.

Wenn ich Klavier spiele, erlebe ich mich selbst als Anfängerin. Es ist verheißungsvoll. Ein Abenteuer. So wie das neue Jahr, das nun beginnt.

Hören & Lesen.

Während Virginia Woolf am Silvestertag in ihr Tagebuch schreibt:

„Morgen ist ein neues Jahr, und ich empfinde diesen sonderbaren, lieblichen Gedanken des Neubeginns.“

erlebt Svea in Ich will dies, das und dich, dass ihre Vorsatzliste für das neue Jahr in falsche Hände gerät, was zu einer amüsanten Liebesgeschichte führt, die bei Libby zu finden ist.

Auf dem Bücherstapel liegt noch eine Reihe von Büchern, die ich in diesem Jahr nicht ausgelesen habe: Roger Fry von Virginia Woolf, Amerika Tag und Nacht von Simone de Beauvoir, neu: die Tagebücher von Rudi Dutschke.

In diesem Jahr habe ich mir angewöhnt, mehr Blogs und weniger Nachrichten zu lesen. Blogs, die ich in diesem Jahr gerne gelesen habe:

• Gedanken der Öcherin
  
• Buddenbohm & Söhne
• fortlaufend
• LandLebenBlog
• Pressepfarrerin
• Schreiblehrling
• sinnundverstand

Und die ultimative Silvester-Playlist ist in diesem Jahr:

• Auld Lang Syne
• Alt wie ein Baum (Puhdys)
• America (Simone & Garfunkel)
• Shake it off (Taylor Swift)
• Mensch (Herbert Grönemeyer)
• Am Strande (Clara Schumann & Heinrich Heine)
• Leuchtturm (Nena)
• Imagine (John Lennon)
• Freude schöner Götterfunken (Ludwig van Beethoven)
• Was keiner wagt (Konstantin Wecker & Hannes Wader)
• People have the power (Patti Smith)
• Wenn Träume sterben (Puhdys)
• Ostseelied (Hildegard Knef)
• Auf das, was da noch kommt (Lotte & Max Giesinger)

I have been doing some practice this morning. My White Crane and Fut Gar. Creating explosions from my lower dantian and weaving buzz saw energy from my arms as I drift through all distances.

Kick, punch, knee, elbow takedown. Grounding my body into the earth and generating power from that. I feel the fascia in my belly tightening like a drum.

I want to know what my highest passion is in this current moment?

como un toro raspado se fue quedando y sin ganas hasta que una tarde / furioso comprendió que las puertas que de verdad importan se abren sólo a golpe de corazón

I get to see E in just 2 more days. It’s been almost a month away from her and I miss her so much, I miss the feeling of hugging her, seeing her smile, the smell of her, her hair tickling my face and getting in my mouth, I miss picking her up and so much more. God I just want her in my arms so badly.

Graphene has now become an exceptionally revolutionary material of the 21st century, with potential to revolutionize all types of industries such as electronics and energy, automotive and high-performance coatings. As the demand grows across the globe, India is soon becoming a major center of graphene development. Graphene manufacturers in India and high-tech nanomaterial manufacturers are becoming international brands today as to their quality, scalability and manufacturing driven by research. ARMI®, a well-known brand of the BTcorp Generique Nano Pvt. Ltd. is one of such innovators which has established its brand as a reliable supplier of high performance solutions using graphene in industries and business applications.

The Rise of Graphene Manufacturing in India

India’s growing focus on nanotechnology, Make in India initiatives, and advanced material research has fueled the growth of graphene manufacturers in India. The ecosystem has developed swiftly since the beginning of academic research laboratories all the way to large-scaled production units. The contemporary manufacturers in India also make various derivatives of graphene such as: powdered graphene and powdered graphene oxide, which are customized to be used in applications like: Anticorrosion and ceramic coating. Carmotive and aerospace parts. Energy storage systems Electronics and electrical materials. This development has transformed India into a destination to both local and international consumers in which they can count on to source graphene.

ARMI®: Redefining Quality in Graphene Solutions

ARMI® is an invention of BTcorp Generique Nano Pvt. Ltd. that leads this change. The brand is also concerned with high-accuracy graphene products that satisfy the performance requirements of the world at affordable prices. As one of the emerging top, ARMI® emphasizes: Consistent material purity Microscopic-level particle size distribution. Application-specific formulations Product development Supported by research. They have sophisticated production capacity to serve all the industries that need reliable and scalable graphene solutions.

Expertise in Graphene Oxide Manufacturing

Graphene oxide is one of the rapidly expanding segments of the nanomaterials with good dispersibility and chemical activity. The graphene oxide producers in India are also providing this product in increasing quantities as a coating, composite, and research material. The graphene oxide powder provided by ARMI® is designed to provide: High surface area Great performance in both water and solvents dispersion. Good adhesive qualities to coating and composite products. This is especially applicable in next-generation protective coating, corrosive resistance applications and advanced material studies.

Why ARMI® Is a Trusted Graphene Supplier

With a strong manufacturing backbone and a commitment to innovation, ARMI® has positioned itself among reliable graphene suppliers in India. The brand strategy extends beyond manufacturing, it is about the knowledge of the actual realities in the industrial world, and how it can provide graphene solutions that would enhance durability, efficiency, and performance.

Key strengths include: Internal research and development, quality assurance. Massive manufacturing of large orders and customized ones. Application development technical support. Adherence to international standards of quality. All these aspects makeARMI® a choice of companies that would like to have long-term solutions regarding the supply of graphene.

India’s Future as a Global Graphene Hub

As demand continues to rise, the role of top graphene manufacturers in India will become even more critical in shaping the global materials landscape. Brands like ARMI® are not only contributing to domestic innovation but are also helping India compete on an international scale. With ongoing advancements in graphene powder and graphene oxide powder production, India is set to become a global center for high-performance nanomaterials.

Conclusion

The growth of graphene technology in India marks a significant shift in advanced materials manufacturing. Among the many graphene manufacturers in India, ARMI® by BTcorp Generique Nano Pvt. Ltd. stands out for its quality-driven approach, innovation, and application-focused solutions. As industries continue to adopt graphene-based technologies, ARMI® remains committed to delivering reliable, high-performance materials that drive the next wave of industrial innovation.

Graphene has now become an exceptionally revolutionary material of the 21st century, with potential to revolutionize all types of industries such as electronics and energy, automotive and high-performance coatings. As the demand grows across the globe, India is soon becoming a major center of graphene development. Graphene manufacturers in India and high-tech nanomaterial manufacturers are becoming international brands today as to their quality, scalability and manufacturing driven by research. ARMI, a well-known brand of the BTcorp Generique Nano Pvt. Ltd. is one of such innovators which has established its brand as a reliable supplier of high performance solutions using graphene in industries and business applications.

The Rise of Graphene Manufacturing in India

India’s growing focus on nanotechnology, Make in India initiatives, and advanced material research has fueled the growth of graphene manufacturers in India. The ecosystem has developed swiftly since the beginning of academic research laboratories all the way to large-scaled production units. The contemporary manufacturers in India also make various derivatives of graphene such as: powdered graphene and powdered graphene oxide, which are customized to be used in applications like: Anticorrosion and ceramic coating. Carmotive and aerospace parts. Energy storage systems Electronics and electrical materials. This development has transformed India into a destination to both local and international consumers in which they can count on to source graphene.

ARMI: Redefining Quality in Graphene Solutions

ARMI is an invention of BTcorp Generique Nano Pvt. Ltd. that leads this change. The brand is also concerned with high-accuracy graphene products that satisfy the performance requirements of the world at affordable prices. As one of the emerging top graphene manufacturers in India, ARMI emphasizes: Consistent material purity Microscopic-level particle size distribution. Application-specific formulations Product development Supported by research. They have sophisticated production capacity to serve all the industries that need reliable and scalable graphene solutions.

Expertise in Graphene Oxide Manufacturing

Graphene oxide is one of the rapidly expanding segments of the nanomaterials with good dispersibility and chemical activity. The graphene oxide producers in India are also providing this product in increasing quantities as a coating, composite, and research material. The graphene oxide powder provided by ARMI is designed to provide: High surface area Great performance in both water and solvents dispersion. Good adhesive qualities to coating and composite products. This is especially applicable in next-generation protective coating, corrosive resistance applications and advanced material studies.

Why ARMI Is a Trusted Graphene Supplier

With a strong manufacturing backbone and a commitment to innovation, ARMI has positioned itself among reliable graphene suppliers in India. The brand strategy extends beyond manufacturing, it is about the knowledge of the actual realities in the industrial world, and how it can provide graphene solutions that would enhance durability, efficiency, and performance. Key strengths include: Internal research and development, quality assurance. Massive manufacturing of large orders and customized ones. Application development technical support. Adherence to international standards of quality. All these aspects make ARMI a choice of companies that would like to have long-term solutions regarding the supply of graphene.

India’s Future as a Global Graphene Hub

As demand continues to rise, the role of top graphene manufacturers in India will become even more critical in shaping the global materials landscape. Brands like ARMI are not only contributing to domestic innovation but are also helping India compete on an international scale. With ongoing advancements in graphene powder and graphene oxide powder production, India is set to become a global center for high-performance nanomaterials.

Conclusion

The growth of graphene technology in India marks a significant shift in advanced materials manufacturing. Among the many graphene manufacturers in India, ARMI by BTcorp Generique Nano Pvt. Ltd. stands out for its quality-driven approach, innovation, and application-focused solutions. As industries continue to adopt graphene-based technologies, ARMI remains committed to delivering reliable, high-performance materials that drive the next wave of industrial innovation.

The difference between the British and Americans is like the difference between tea and coffee. I mean, let’s not talk about the Boston Tea Party. Let’s not talk about how the king was taxing them over 10% of their wages, and they, the early colonizers, became gruff and spilled all the king’s tea into the Boston Harbor. Can you imagine if that happened today? First of all, we’re taxed 20%, at least, of our wages.

Then the money that’s already been taxed is taxed again at the grocery store. It’s taxed again when you buy a car, buy a house. It’s taxed when you’re brought into this world, because you pay taxes on top of the pediatricians and gynecologists and everybody who brings a baby out of the womb into the world and slaps its little butt. But you’re also taxed at death. If those Boston Tea Party members was around today, I hate to think what would happen.

But let’s get back to the metaphor, shall we? The difference between the British and Americans is the difference between tea and coffee. Tea is something you sip slowly and it makes you feel good, especially green tea, or chamomile right before bed. The British have this thing called tea time. Americans don’t have coffee time. They might have coffee with their breakfast. They might go out and eat breakfast with some friends and have coffee.

But there is a complete difference. Coffee is like a nuclear explosion of wakefulness. Americans don’t have time for pitter-patter, for chitter-chatter. Americans don’t have time for tea time. Americans just wanna get blasted with wakefulness so they can go and do their grind. They got a hustle to do. They gotta wake up. They gotta be alert. They ain’t got time to trip into work and be sleepy and yawning.

No, they need something to hit the veins with caffeine-laced wakefulness, and get out of my way, and road rage all the way to work, and road rage all the way home. “How was your day, honey?” “Uh, I didn’t have enough coffee so it was kinda slow, until Sam made a pot of that thick, black ichor where the spoon stood up straight.” But in Britain, they have tea time. They go to their garden, which is their backyard or their front yard.

You know, even if it doesn’t have any plants, they call it a garden, because the implication is you’re gonna grow something in your garden. And you’re gonna sit down and you’re gonna relax with some friends and sip tea, and talk about the meaning of life, or Jesus Christ, or hell, or the Parliament, or who did what. And there’s just this fellowship thing going on. And time seems to stand still during tea time.

Well, tea time is over. Gotta get going. But not Americans. Americans are having a barbecue. They’re roasting ribs and drinking beer, and them British are slowing time down with tea time. That’s how the British and Americans are different. Americans are brash, like John Smith, killing people in the early colonized nation of America, fighting Indians when he has to, making up stories when he has to, marketing himself as something greater than himself, the next big thing, get me another cup of coffee.

The British are into the king and royalty, and tea time. And not mysticism per se, but antiquity. When I was running an online magazine, it became apparent to me that stories that came from England and South Africa were much, much better edited than stories that came from Americans. Why? Because the British had tea time. They could slow time down and zero in on their story and sip some tea and relax and concentrate and focus.

But Americans, they drink that cup of coffee, then they drink another, and then the pot of coffee was in ‘em, and they are, “I ain’t got time for this.” And they’d rush through their editing with a caffeine haze. That’s the way I see it. And I’m drinking lemon chamomile tea, two pouches, to try to get myself back into a sleep schedule that is healthy. So tonight, I’m British. I’m focused. I’m concentrating on philosophical meanderings and I’m writing it down in this blog.

Tomorrow, I will wake up an American and I will drink my mushroom coffee mixed in with instant coffee, and it will be like legal crack cocaine in my bloodstream, and I will be rushing like a bull getting Vinnie to St. Jude where he’ll get his chemotherapy. But tomorrow night, I will become British again. I will slow down. I’ll make some lemon chamomile tea, take some melatonin with some L-theanine… and slip away into British dreamland.

Goodnight.

• Tress of the Emerald Sea (Secret Projects #1) by Brandon Sanderson, 442p: This book has fascinating world building with a sea made of deadly spores, instead of water. I liked the whimsical, fairy tale tone and the independent female character. It plays with the trope of the damsel-in-distress trope by flipping it: the male protagonist is imprisoned and needs to be saved by the woman. I had some issues with the narrative voice. It was fine at the beginning, even with the forth-wall-breaking bits, but it felt strange that the narrator (Hoid, a character who appears in other Cosmere books) seems omnipresent even during events he couldn't have witnessed, and then recounts them anyway. That bothered me. Also, his mismatched-clothing jokes get old pretty fast. The villains (including the dragon) were weak overall. I think the best “villain” in the book is the sea spores themselves, they are terrifying! The plot twist was cool! It was a light read and fun read, but I wasn't very invested in the characters.

• Komarr (Vorkosigan Saga (Publication Order) #11) by Lois McMaster Bujold, 384p: This is the first book with Miles Vorkosigan fully steps into his role as Imperial Auditor. We get to see this other planet, Komarr, with its domes and an ongoing terraforming project. It's an investigative procedural that builds toward bigger political implications for the next book in the series. This one is the book where Miles starts to fall in love. Some new characters are introduced!

• A Civil Campaign (Vorkosigan Saga (Publication Order) #12) by Lois McMaster Bujold, 534p: What an amazing read! This book happens around the time of Emperor Gregor's wedding, and there is a lot going on. It's full of juicy political intrigue and romance shenanigans. It's a great reunion of characters on Barrayar: we get Miles, Ivan, Aral and Cordelia, Koudelkas, Ilyan, Mark, Kareen, the whole gang. It's super fun! I laughed out loud several times while reading this one. There are engineered bugs for the food industry, but also gardening, multiple romantic entanglements, internal politics and an awesome transgender man who defies all traditional Barrayaran beliefs. In summary, fantastic! This series doesn't stop to get better.

#readinglist #books #reading

Tuesday

In Summary: * I love this Season! College Bowl Game Season! Today I've been following 3 Bowl Games: the first two of my day were very exciting and entertaining: the Independence Bowl won by Louisiana Tech, and the Music City Bowl won by Illinois. My third of the day, the Alamo Bowl, has just started and I'm gonna do my best to stay awake for the whole game, though I fully expect to do a fair amount of dozing while listening to the call of the game over my Bose Radio. Not a bad way to end a good day.

Prayers, etc.: * My daily prayers

Health Metrics: * bw= 220.02 lbs. * bp= 135/81 (68)

Exercise: * kegel pelvic floor exercise, half squats, calf raises, wall push-ups

Diet: * 06:40 – 1 banana, 1 peanut butter sandwich * 10:45 – pork belly, whole kernel corn, mashed potatoes * 15:48 – steak burgers with mushroom gravy

Activities, Chores, etc.: * 05:00 – listen to local news talk radio * 06:30 – read, pray, follow news reports from various sources, surf the socials, nap * 07:45 – bank accounts activity monitored * 13:00 – listening to the Reliance Technologies Independence Bowl, Coastal Carolina Chanticleers vs Louisiana Tech Bulldogs * 16:50 –... and Louisiana Tech wins, final score 23 to 14. * 17:00 – tuning now into the Liberty Mutual Music City Bowl, Tennessee Volunters vs Illinois Fightin' Illini, the game already in progess with Tennessee now leading 7 to 0 in the First Quarter. * 20:00 – ... and the Illini win one VERY Exciting game! 30 to 28 * 20:04 – now switching over to the Valero Alamo Bowl: USC Trojans vs. TCU Horned Frogs

Chess: * 14:50 – moved in most (all but 4 games, and in each of those remaining I have 4 days reflection time still on my clock, plenty of time cushion, no pressure) pending CC games

The robots are taking over Wall Street, but this time they're not just working for the big players. Retail investors, armed with smartphones and a healthy dose of optimism, are increasingly turning to artificial intelligence to guide their investment decisions. According to recent research from eToro, the use of AI-powered investment solutions amongst retail investors jumped by 46% in 2025, with nearly one in five now utilising these tools to manage their portfolios. It's a digital gold rush, powered by algorithms that promise to level the playing field between Main Street and Wall Street.

But here's the trillion-dollar question: Are these AI-generated market insights actually improving retail investor decision-making, or are they simply amplifying noise in an already chaotic marketplace? As these systems become more sophisticated and ubiquitous, the financial world faces a reckoning. The platforms serving these insights must grapple with thorny questions about transparency, accountability, and the very real risk of market manipulation.

The Rise of the Robot Advisors

The numbers tell a compelling story. Assets under management in the robo-advisors market reached $1.8 trillion in 2024, with the United States leading at $1.46 trillion. The global robo-advisory market was valued at $8.39 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to $69.32 billion by 2032, exhibiting a compound annual growth rate of 30.3%. The broader AI trading platform market is expected to increase from $11.26 billion in 2024 to $69.95 billion by 2034.

This isn't just institutional money quietly flowing into algorithmic strategies. Retail investors are leading the charge, with the retail segment expected to expand at the fastest rate. Why? Increased accessibility of AI-powered tools, user-friendly interfaces, and the democratising effect of these technologies. AI platforms offer automated investment tools and educational resources, making it easier for individuals with limited experience to participate in the market.

The platforms themselves have evolved considerably. Leading robo-advisors like Betterment and Wealthfront both use AI for investing, automatic portfolio rebalancing, and tax-loss harvesting. They reinvest dividends automatically and invest money in exchange-traded funds rather than individual stocks. Betterment charges 0.25% annually for its Basic plan, whilst Wealthfront employs Modern Portfolio Theory and provides advanced features including direct indexing for larger accounts.

Generational shifts drive this adoption. According to the World Economic Forum's survey of 13,000 investors across 13 countries, investors are increasingly heterogeneous across generations. Millennials are now the most likely to use AI tools at 72% compared to 61% a year ago, surpassing Gen Z at 69%. Even more telling: 40% of Gen Z investors are using AI chatbots for financial coaching or advice, compared with only 8% of baby boomers.

Overcoming Human Biases

The case for AI in retail investing rests on a compelling premise: humans are terrible at making rational investment decisions. We're emotional, impulsive, prone to recency bias, and easily swayed by fear and greed. Research from Deutsche Bank in 2025 highlights that whilst human traders remain susceptible to recent events and easily available information, AI systems maintain composure during market swings.

During market volatility in April 2025, AI platforms like dbLumina recognised widespread investor excitement as a signal to buy, even as many individuals responded with fear and hesitation. This capacity to override emotional decision-making represents one of AI's most significant advantages.

Research focusing on AI-driven financial robo-advisors examined how these systems influence retail investors' loss aversion and overconfidence biases. Using data from 461 retail investors analysed through structural equation modelling, results indicate that robo-advisors' perceived personalisation, interactivity, autonomy, and algorithm transparency substantially mitigated investors' overconfidence and loss-aversion biases.

The Ontario Securities Commission released a comprehensive report on artificial intelligence in supporting retail investor decision-making. The experiment consisted of an online investment simulation testing how closely Canadians followed suggestions for investing a hypothetical $20,000. Participants were told suggestions came from a human financial services provider, an AI tool, or a blended approach.

Notably, there was no discernible difference in adherence to investment suggestions provided by a human or AI tool, indicating Canadian investors may be receptive to AI advice. More significantly, 29% of Canadians are already using AI to access financial information, with 90% of those using it to inform their financial decisions to at least a moderate extent.

The Deloitte Center for Financial Services predicts that generative AI-enabled applications will likely become the leader in advice mind-space for retail investors, growing from its current nascent stage to 78% usage in 2028, and could become the leading source of retail investment advice in 2027.

Black Boxes and Algorithmic Opacity

But here's where things get murky. Unlike rule-based bots, AI systems adapt their strategies based on market behaviour, meaning even developers may not fully predict each action. This “black box” nature makes transparency difficult. Regulators demand audit-ready procedures, yet many AI systems operate as black boxes, making it difficult to explain why a particular trade was made. This lack of explainability risks undermining trust amongst regulators and clients.

Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) represents an attempt to solve this problem. XAI allows human users to comprehend and trust results created by machine learning algorithms. Unlike traditional AI models that function as black boxes, explainable AI strives to make reasoning accessible and understandable.

In finance, where decisions affect millions of lives and billions of dollars, explainability isn't just desirable; it's often a regulatory and ethical requirement. Customers and regulators need to trust these decisions, which means understanding why and how they were made.

Some platforms are attempting to address this deficit. Tickeron assigns a “Confidence Level” to each prediction and allows users to review the AI's past accuracy on that specific pattern and stock. TrendSpider consolidates advanced charting, market scanning, strategy backtesting, and automated execution, providing retail traders with institutional-grade capabilities.

However, these represent exceptions rather than the rule. The lack of transparency in many AI trading systems makes it difficult for stakeholders to understand how decisions are being made, raising concerns about fairness.

The Flash Crash Warning

If you need a cautionary tale about what happens when algorithms run amok, look no further than May 6, 2010. The “Flash Crash” remains one of the most significant examples of how algorithmic trading can contribute to extreme market volatility. The Dow Jones Industrial Average plummeted nearly 1,000 points (about 9%) within minutes before rebounding almost as quickly. Although the market indices partially rebounded the same day, the flash crash erased almost $1 trillion in market value.

What triggered it? At 2:32 pm EDT, against a backdrop of unusually high volatility and thinning liquidity, a large fundamental trader (Waddell & Reed Financial Inc.) initiated a sell programme for 75,000 E-Mini S&P contracts (valued at approximately $4.1 billion). The computer algorithm was set to target an execution rate of 9% of the trading volume calculated over the previous minute, but without regard to price or time.

High-frequency traders quickly bought and then resold contracts to each other, generating a “hot potato” volume effect. In 14 seconds, high-frequency traders traded over 27,000 contracts, accounting for about 49% of total trading volume, whilst buying only about 200 additional contracts net.

One example that sums up the volatile afternoon: Accenture fell from nearly $40 to one cent and recovered all of its value within seconds. Over 20,000 trades representing 5.5 million shares were executed at prices more than 60% away from their 2:40 pm value, and these trades were subsequently cancelled.

The flash crash demonstrated how unrelated trading algorithms activated across different parts of the financial marketplace can cascade into a systemic event. By reacting to rapidly changing market signals immediately, multiple algorithms generate sharp price swings that lead to short-term volatility. The speed of the crash, largely driven by an algorithm, led agencies like the SEC to enact new “circuit breakers” and mechanisms to halt runaway market crashes. The Limit Up-Limit Down mechanism, implemented in 2012, now prevents trades in National Market System securities from occurring outside of specified price bands.

The Herding Problem

Here's an uncomfortable truth about AI-powered trading: if everyone's algorithm is reading the same data and using similar strategies, we risk creating a massive herding problem. Research examining algorithmic trading and herding behaviour breaks new ground by investigating how algorithmic trading influences stock markets. The findings carry critical implications as researchers uncover dual behaviours of algorithmic trading-induced herding and anti-herding in varying market conditions.

Research has observed that the correlation between asset prices has risen, suggesting that AI systems might encourage herding behaviour amongst traders. As a result, market movements could be intensified, leading to greater volatility. Herd behaviour can emerge because different trading systems adopt similar investment strategies using the same raw data points.

The GameStop and AMC trading frenzy of 2021 offered a different kind of cautionary tale. In early 2021, GameStop experienced a “short squeeze”, with a price surge of almost 1,625% within a week. This financial operation was attributed to activity from Reddit's WallStreetBets subreddit. On January 28, 2021, GameStop stock reached an astonishing intraday high of $483, a meteoric rise from its price of under $20 at the beginning of the year.

Using Reddit, retail investors came together to act “collectively” on certain stocks. According to data firm S3 Partners, by 27 January short sellers had accumulated losses of more than $5 billion in 2021.

As Guy Warren, CEO of FinTech ITRS Group noted, “Until now, retail trading activity has never been able to move the market one way or another. However, following the successful coordination by a large group of traders, the power dynamic has shifted; exposing the vulnerability of the market as well as the weaknesses in firms' trading systems.”

Whilst GameStop represented social media-driven herding rather than algorithm-driven herding, it demonstrates the systemic risks when large numbers of retail investors coordinate their behaviour, whether through Reddit threads or similar AI recommendations. The risk models of certain hedge funds and institutional investors proved themselves inadequate in a situation like the one that unfolded in January. As such an event had never happened before, risk models were subsequently not equipped to manage them.

The Manipulation Question

Multiple major regulatory bodies have raised concerns about AI in financial markets, including the Bank of England, the European Central Bank, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets, the International Organization of Securities Commissions, and the Financial Stability Board. Regulatory authorities are concerned about the potential for deep and reinforcement learning-based trading algorithms to engage in or facilitate market abuse. As the Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets has noted, naively programmed reinforcement learning algorithms could inadvertently learn to manipulate markets.

Research from Wharton professors confirms concerns about AI-driven market manipulation, emphasising the risk of AI collusion. Their research reveals the mechanisms behind AI collusion and demonstrates which mechanism dominates under different trading environments. Despite AI's perceived ability to enhance efficiency, recent research demonstrates the ever-present risk of AI-powered market manipulation through collusive trading, despite AI having no intention of collusion.

CFTC Commissioner Kristin Johnson expressed deep concern about the potential for abuse of AI technologies to facilitate fraud in markets, calling for heightened penalties for those who intentionally use AI technologies to engage in fraud, market manipulation, or the evasion of regulations.

The SEC's concerns are equally serious. Techniques such as deepfakes on social media to artificially inflate stock prices or disseminate false information pose substantial risks. The SEC has prioritised combating these activities, leveraging its in-house AI expertise to monitor the market for malicious conduct.

In March 2024, the SEC announced that San Francisco-based Global Predictions, along with Toronto-based Delphia, would pay a combined $400,000 in fines for falsely claiming to use artificial intelligence. SEC Chair Gensler has warned businesses against “AI washing”, making misleading AI-related claims similar to greenwashing. Within the past year, the SEC commenced four enforcement actions against registrants for misrepresentation of AI's purported capability, scope, and usage.

Scholars argue that during market turmoil, AI accelerates volatility faster than traditional market forces. AI operates like “black-boxes”, leaving human programmers unable to understand why AI makes trading decisions as the technology learns on its own. Traditional corporate and securities laws struggle to police AI because black-box algorithms make autonomous decisions without a culpable mental state.

The Bias Trap

AI ethics in finance is about ensuring that AI-driven decisions uphold fairness, transparency, and accountability. When AI models inherit biases from flawed data or poorly designed algorithms, they can unintentionally discriminate, restricting access to financial services and triggering compliance penalties.

AI models can learn and propagate biases if training data represents past discrimination, such as redlining, which systematically denied home loans to racial minorities. Machine learning models trained on historical mortgage data may deny loans at higher rates to applicants from historically marginalised neighbourhoods simply because their profile matches past biased decisions.

The proprietary nature of algorithms and their complexity allow discrimination to hide behind supposed objectivity. These “black box” algorithms can produce life-altering outputs with little knowledge of their inner workings. “Explainability” is a core tenet of fair lending systems. Lenders are required to tell consumers why they were denied, providing a paper trail for accountability.

This creates what AI ethics researchers call the “fairness paradox”: we can't directly measure bias against protected categories if we don't collect data about those categories, yet collecting such data raises concerns about potential misuse.

In December 2024, the Financial Conduct Authority announced an initiative to undertake research into AI bias to inform public discussion and published its first research note on bias in supervised machine learning. The FCA will regulate “critical third parties” (providers of critical technologies, including AI, to authorised financial services entities) under the Financial Services Markets Act 2023.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau announced that it will expand the definition of “unfair” within the UDAAP regulatory framework to include conduct that is discriminatory, and plans to review “models, algorithms and decision-making processes used in connection with consumer financial products and services.”

The Guardrails Being Built

The regulatory landscape is evolving rapidly, though not always coherently. A challenge emerges from the divergence between regulatory approaches. The FCA largely sees its existing regulatory regime as fit for purpose, with enforcement action in AI-related matters likely to be taken under the Senior Managers and Certification Regime and the new Consumer Duty. Meanwhile, the SEC has proposed specific new rules targeting AI conflicts of interest. This regulatory fragmentation creates compliance challenges for firms operating across multiple jurisdictions.

On December 5, 2024, the CFTC released a nonbinding staff advisory addressing the use of AI by CFTC-regulated entities in derivatives markets, describing it as a “measured first step” to engage with the marketplace. The CFTC undertook a series of initiatives in 2024 to address CFTC registrants' and other industry participants' use and application of AI technologies. Whilst these actions do not constitute formal rulemaking or adoption of new regulations, they underscore CFTC's continued awareness of and attention to the potential benefits and risks of AI on financial markets.

The SEC has proposed Predictive Analytics Rules that would require broker-dealers and registered investment advisers to eliminate or neutralise conflicts of interest associated with their use of AI and other technologies. SEC Chair Gensler stated firms are “obligated to eliminate or otherwise address any conflicts of interest and not put their own interests ahead of their investors' interests.”

FINRA has identified several regulatory risks for member firms associated with AI use that warrant heightened attention, including recordkeeping, customer information protection, risk management, and compliance with Regulation Best Interest. On June 27, 2024, FINRA issued a regulatory notice reminding member firms of their obligations.

In Europe, the Financial Conduct Authority publicly recognises the potential benefits of AI in financial services, running an AI sandbox for firms to test innovations. In October 2024, the FCA launched its AI lab, which includes initiatives such as the Supercharged Sandbox, AI Live Testing, AI Spotlight, AI Sprint, and the AI Input Zone.

In May 2024, the European Securities and Markets Authority issued guidance to firms using AI technologies when providing investment services to retail clients. ESMA expects firms to comply with relevant MiFID II requirements, particularly regarding organisational aspects, conduct of business, and acting in clients' best interests. ESMA notes that whilst AI diffusion is still in its initial phase, the potential impact on retail investor protection is likely to be significant. Firms' decisions remain the responsibility of management bodies, irrespective of whether those decisions are taken by people or AI-based tools.

The EU's Artificial Intelligence Act kicked in on August 1, 2024, ranking AI systems by risk levels: unacceptable, high, limited, or minimal/no risk.

What Guardrails and Disclaimers Are Actually Needed?

So what does effective oversight actually look like? Based on regulatory guidance and industry best practices, several key elements emerge.

Disclosure requirements must be comprehensive. Investment firms using AI and machine learning models should abide by basic disclosures with clients. The SEC's proposal addresses conflicts of interest arising from AI use, requiring firms to evaluate and mitigate conflicts associated with their use of AI and predictive data analytics.

SEC Chair Gary Gensler emphasised that “Investor protection requires that the humans who deploy a model put in place appropriate guardrails” and “If you deploy a model, you've got to make sure that it complies with the law.” This human accountability remains crucial, even as systems become more autonomous.

The SEC, the North American Securities Administrators Association, and FINRA jointly warned that bad actors are using the growing popularity and complexity of AI to lure victims into scams. Investors should remember that securities laws generally require securities firms, professionals, exchanges, and other investment platforms to be registered. Red flags include high-pressure sales tactics by unregistered individuals, promises of quick profits, or claims of guaranteed returns with little or no risk.

Beyond regulatory requirements, platforms need practical safeguards. Firms like Morgan Stanley are implementing guardrails by limiting GPT-4 tools to internal use with proprietary data only, keeping risk low and compliance high.

Specific guardrails and disclaimers that should be standard include:

Clear Performance Disclaimers: AI-generated insights should carry explicit warnings that past performance does not guarantee future results, and that AI models can fail during unprecedented market conditions.

Confidence Interval Disclosure: Platforms should disclose confidence levels or uncertainty ranges associated with AI predictions, as Tickeron does with its Confidence Level system.

Data Source Transparency: Investors should know what data sources feed the AI models and how recent that data is, particularly important given how quickly market conditions change.

Limitation Acknowledgements: Clear statements about what the AI cannot do, such as predict black swan events, account for geopolitical shocks, or guarantee returns.

Human Oversight Indicators: Disclosure of whether human experts review AI recommendations and under what circumstances human intervention occurs.

Conflict of Interest Statements: Explicit disclosure if the platform benefits from directing users toward certain investments or products.

Algorithmic Audit Trails: Platforms should maintain comprehensive logs of how recommendations were generated to satisfy regulatory demands.

Education Resources: Rather than simply providing AI-generated recommendations, platforms should offer educational content to help users understand the reasoning and evaluate recommendations critically.

AI Literacy as a Prerequisite

Here's a fundamental problem: retail investors are adopting AI tools faster than they're developing AI literacy. According to the World Economic Forum's findings, 42% of people “learn by doing” when it comes to investing, 28% don't invest because they don't know how or find it confusing, and 70% of investors surveyed said they would invest more if they had more opportunities to learn.

Research highlights the importance of generative AI literacy along with climate and financial literacy in shaping investor outcomes. Research findings reveal disparities in current adoption and anticipated future use of generative AI across age groups, suggesting opportunities for targeted education.

The financial literacy of individual investors has a significant impact on stock market investment decisions. A large-scale randomised controlled trial with over 28,000 investors at a major Chinese brokerage firm found that GenAI-powered robo-advisors significantly improve financial literacy and shift investor behaviour toward more diversified, cost-efficient, and risk-aware investment choices.

This suggests a virtuous cycle: properly designed AI tools can actually enhance financial literacy whilst simultaneously providing investment guidance. But this only works if the tools are designed with education as a primary goal, not just maximising assets under management or trading volume.

AI is the leading topic that retail investors plan to learn more about over the next year (23%), followed by cryptoassets and blockchain technology (22%), tax rules (18%), and ETFs (17%), according to eToro research. This demonstrates investor awareness of the knowledge gap, but platforms and regulators must ensure educational resources are readily available and comprehensible.

The Double-Edged Sword

For investors, AI-synthesised alternative data can offer an information edge, enabling them to analyse and predict consumer behaviour to gain insight ahead of company earnings announcements. According to Michael Finnegan, CEO of Eagle Alpha, there were just 100 alternative data providers in the 2010s; now there are 2,000. In 2023, Deloitte predicted that the global market for alternative data would reach $137 billion by 2030, increasing at a compound annual growth rate of 53%.

But alternative data introduces transparency challenges. How was the data collected? Is it representative? Has it been verified? When AI models train on alternative data sources like satellite imagery of parking lots, credit card transaction data, or social media sentiment, the quality and reliability of insights depend entirely on the underlying data quality.

Adobe observed that between November 1 and December 31, 2024, traffic from generative AI sources to U.S. retail sites increased by 1,300 percent compared to the same period in 2023. This demonstrates how quickly AI is being integrated into consumer behaviour, but it also means AI models analysing retail trends are increasingly analysing other AI-generated traffic, creating potential feedback loops.

Combining Human and Machine Intelligence

Perhaps the most promising path forward isn't choosing between human and artificial intelligence, but thoughtfully combining them. The Ontario Securities Commission research found no discernible difference in adherence to investment suggestions provided by a human or AI tool, but the “blended” approach showed promise.

The likely trajectory points toward configurable, focused AI modules, explainable systems designed to satisfy regulators, and new user interfaces where investors interact with AI advisors through voice, chat, or immersive environments. What will matter most is not raw technological horsepower, but the ability to integrate machine insights with human oversight in a way that builds durable trust.

The future of automated trading will be shaped by demands for greater transparency and user empowerment. As traders become more educated and tech-savvy, they will expect full control and visibility over the tools they use. We are likely to see more platforms offering open-source strategy libraries, real-time risk dashboards, and community-driven AI training models.

Research examining volatility shows that market volatility triggers opposing trading behaviours: as volatility increases, Buy-side Algorithmic Traders retreat whilst High-Frequency Traders intensify trading, possibly driven by opposing hedging and speculative motives, respectively. This suggests that different types of AI systems serve different purposes and should be matched to different investor needs and risk tolerances.

Making the Verdict

So are AI-generated market insights improving retail investor decision-making or merely amplifying noise? The honest answer is both, depending on the implementation, regulation, and education surrounding these tools.

The evidence suggests AI can genuinely help. Research shows that properly designed robo-advisors reduce behavioural biases, improve diversification, and enhance financial literacy. The Ontario Securities Commission found that 90% of Canadians using AI for financial information are using it to inform their decisions to at least a moderate extent. AI maintains composure during market volatility when human traders panic.

But the risks are equally real. Black-box algorithms lack transparency. Herding behaviour can amplify market movements. Market manipulation becomes more sophisticated. Bias in training data perpetuates discrimination. Flash crashes demonstrate how algorithmic cascades can spiral out of control. The widespread adoption of similar AI strategies could create systemic fragility.

The platforms serving these insights must ensure transparency and model accountability through several mechanisms:

Mandatory Explainability: Regulators should require AI platforms to provide explanations comprehensible to retail investors, not just data scientists. XAI techniques need to be deployed as standard features, not optional add-ons.

Independent Auditing: Third-party audits of AI models should become standard practice, examining both performance and bias, with results publicly available in summary form.

Stress Testing: AI models should be stress-tested against historical market crises to understand how they would have performed during the 2008 financial crisis, the 2010 Flash Crash, or the 2020 pandemic crash.

Confidence Calibration: AI predictions should include properly calibrated confidence intervals, and platforms should track whether their stated confidence levels match actual outcomes over time.

Human Oversight Requirements: For retail investors, particularly those with limited experience, AI recommendations above certain risk thresholds should trigger human review or additional warnings.

Education Integration: Platforms should be required to provide educational content explaining how their AI works, what it can and cannot do, and how investors should evaluate its recommendations.

Bias Testing and Reporting: Regular testing for bias across demographic groups, with public reporting of results and remediation efforts.

Incident Reporting: When AI systems make significant errors or contribute to losses, platforms should be required to report these incidents to regulators and communicate them to affected users.

Interoperability and Portability: To prevent lock-in effects and enable informed comparison shopping, standards should enable investors to compare AI platform performance and move their data between platforms.

The fundamental challenge is that AI is neither inherently good nor inherently bad for retail investors. It's a powerful tool that can be used well or poorly, transparently or opaquely, in investors' interests or platforms' interests.

The widespread use of AI widens the gap between institutional investors and retail traders. Whilst large firms have access to advanced algorithms and capital, individual investors often lack such resources, creating an uneven playing field. AI has the potential to narrow this gap by democratising access to sophisticated analysis, but only if the platforms, regulators, and investors themselves commit to transparency and accountability.

As AI becomes the dominant force in retail investing, we need guardrails robust enough to prevent manipulation and protect investors, but flexible enough to allow innovation and genuine improvements in decision-making. We need disclaimers honest about both capabilities and limitations, not legal boilerplate designed to shield platforms from liability. We need education that empowers investors to use these tools critically, not marketing that encourages blind faith in algorithmic superiority.

The algorithm will see you now. The question is whether it's working for you or whether you're working for it. And the answer to that question depends on the choices we make today about transparency, accountability, and the kind of financial system we want to build.

---

References & Sources

1. eToro. (2025). Retail investors flock to AI tools, with usage up 46% in one year

2. Statista. (2024). Global: robo-advisors AUM 2019-2028

3. Fortune Business Insights. (2024). Robo Advisory Market Size, Share, Trends | Growth Report, 2032

4. Precedence Research. (2024). AI Trading Platform Market Size and Forecast 2025 to 2034

5. NerdWallet. (2024). Betterment vs. Wealthfront: 2024 Comparison

6. World Economic Forum. (2025). 2024 Global Retail Investor Outlook

7. Deutsche Bank. (2025). AI platforms and investor behaviour during market volatility. [Referenced in search results]

8. Taylor & Francis Online. (2025). The role of robo-advisors in behavioural finance, shaping investment decisions

9. Ontario Securities Commission. (2024). Artificial Intelligence and Retail Investing: Use Cases and Experimental Research

10. Deloitte. (2024). Retail investors may soon rely on generative AI tools for financial investment advice

11. uTrade Algos. (2024). Why Transparency Matters in Algorithmic Trading

12. Finance Magnates. (2024). Secret Agent: Deploying AI for Traders at Scale

13. CFA Institute. (2025). Explainable AI in Finance: Addressing the Needs of Diverse Stakeholders

14. IBM. (n.d.). What is Explainable AI (XAI)?

15. Springer. (2024). Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in finance: a systematic literature review

16. Wikipedia. (2024). 2010 flash crash

17. CFTC. (2010). The Flash Crash: The Impact of High Frequency Trading on an Electronic Market

18. Corporate Finance Institute. (n.d.). 2010 Flash Crash – Overview, Main Events, Investigation

19. Nature. (2025). The dynamics of the Reddit collective action leading to the GameStop short squeeze

20. Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance. (2022). GameStop and the Reemergence of the Retail Investor

21. Roll Call. (2021). Social media offered lessons, rally point for GameStop trading

22. Nature. (2025). Research on the impact of algorithmic trading on market volatility

23. Wiley Online Library. (2024). Does Algorithmic Trading Induce Herding?

24. Sidley Austin. (2024). Artificial Intelligence in Financial Markets: Systemic Risk and Market Abuse Concerns

25. Wharton School. (2024). AI-Powered Collusion in Financial Markets

26. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. (2024). SEC enforcement actions regarding AI misrepresentation.

27. Brookings Institution. (2024). Reducing bias in AI-based financial services

28. EY. (2024). AI discrimination and bias in financial services

29. Proskauer Rose LLP. (2024). A Tale of Two Regulators: The SEC and FCA Address AI Regulation for Private Funds

30. Financial Conduct Authority. (2024). FCA AI lab launch and bias research initiative.

31. Sidley Austin. (2025). Artificial Intelligence: U.S. Securities and Commodities Guidelines for Responsible Use

32. FINRA. (2024). Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Investment Fraud

33. ESMA. (2024). ESMA provides guidance to firms using artificial intelligence in investment services

34. Deloitte. (2023). Alternative data market predictions.

35. Eagle Alpha. (2024). Growth of alternative data providers.

36. Adobe. (2024). Generative AI traffic to retail sites analysis.

---

Tim Green UK-based Systems Theorist & Independent Technology Writer

Tim explores the intersections of artificial intelligence, decentralised cognition, and posthuman ethics. His work, published at smarterarticles.co.uk, challenges dominant narratives of technological progress while proposing interdisciplinary frameworks for collective intelligence and digital stewardship.

His writing has been featured on Ground News and shared by independent researchers across both academic and technological communities.

ORCID: 0009-0002-0156-9795 Email: tim@smarterarticles.co.uk

See all #Larrys2025Faves

Music presents a dilemma, both timeless and immediate. I listen to a lot of albums spanning almost 100 years, multiple media, and in varied social settings. But it also has an immediacy: new releases, critical buzz, and the excitement of NOW! A year-end best-of tells a partial listening story, but alas:

2025 Superlatives

Best Album: Ryan Davis & the Roadhouse Band – New Threats from the Soul  Best Single & Video: Elderberry Wine by Wednesday Best Debut: Annie DiRusso – Super Pedestrian  Best Comeback: The Lemonheads – Lovechant Best Concert: TIE Ryan Davis & the Roadhouse Band/Snocaps – Bowery Ballroom, Manhattan Kacey Musgraves – Barclays Center, Brooklyn

Fourteen 2025 releases on heavy rotation, in no particular order:

• Snocaps - 'Snocaps' (Anti-): Twins Sisters Powers Reactivate

• Jeff Tweedy - 'Twilight Override' (dBpm Records): A box set of new material? Jeff writes a lot of songs

• Wednesday - 'Bleeds' (Dead Oceans): I slept on this band before Bleeds, awake now

• Ryan Davis & the Roadhouse Band – 'New Threats from the Soul' (Sophomore Lounge): Can't stop listening  The Larry’s100 review

• Kurt Vile/Luke Roberts - 'Classic Love EP' (Verve): Played almost as much as Ryan Davis The Larry’s100 review

• Lemonheads - 'Love Chant' (Fire Records): Cell Phone Blues was almost my song of the year  The Larry’s100 review

• Kathleen Edwards - 'Billionaire' (Dualtone Records): A full-throated and tuneful platter of rugged individualism

• The Bug Club – 'Very Human Features' (Sub Pop): Second great album in 3 years

• Rose City Band - 'Sol y Sombra' (Thrill Jockey): Meditations with steel pedal

• Annie DiRusso - 'Super Pedestrian' (Summer Soup Songs): Punchy, energetic first record. Her Tiny Desk is a must-watch

• Dean Wareham - 'That's the Price of Loving Me' (Carpark Records): Crazy, this is his first solo album

• Superchunk - 'Songs in the Key of Yikes' (Merge): On one of the best post-hiatus runs in indie rock history

• Neil Young - 'Ocean Side/Country Side' (Neil Young Archives): Never before released, even though you know all the songs. Great to hear them, as it was originally conceived and tracked

• Kacey Musgraves - 'Deeper Into The Well' (MCA Nashville): Seven new tracks!

#music #albums #2025BestOf #MusicReviews #BestOfMusic #Larrys2025FavesMusic #NewMusic #NowPlaying #100WordReview #Larrys100 #100DaysToOffload #Larrys2025Faves

Acts 6 is one of those chapters that quietly exposes a truth many people don’t expect: sometimes the greatest threats to a growing, God-led movement don’t come from persecution on the outside, but from pressure, misunderstanding, and neglect on the inside. What makes this chapter so powerful is that it doesn’t sanitize the early church. It doesn’t pretend everyone got along perfectly or that spiritual passion automatically erased human limitations. Instead, Acts 6 shows us what happens when faith grows faster than structure—and how God responds not by shrinking the mission, but by expanding leadership.

By the time we reach this moment in Acts, the church is exploding. Not gradually. Not carefully. Explosively. Thousands of new believers. Daily growth. Diverse backgrounds. Different languages. Different expectations. And suddenly, the apostles are faced with a problem that prayer alone, at least in the way they had been practicing it, cannot fix. Widows are being overlooked. Needs are going unmet. Complaints are being voiced. And for the first time, the church must decide whether it will react defensively or respond wisely.

This chapter matters because it speaks directly to anyone who has ever tried to build something meaningful—whether that’s a ministry, a family, a business, or even a personal spiritual life. Growth always reveals weaknesses. Expansion always exposes cracks. And Acts 6 teaches us that God is not threatened by those cracks. He uses them.

The issue begins with a complaint, and that detail is important. The text tells us that the Hellenistic Jews raised concerns against the Hebraic Jews because their widows were being overlooked in the daily distribution of food. This isn’t a theological disagreement. This isn’t heresy. This is logistics. This is administration. This is fairness. And it’s deeply human. Widows in the ancient world were among the most vulnerable people imaginable. Missing a daily distribution wasn’t an inconvenience—it was dangerous.

What makes the situation more delicate is that this complaint crosses cultural lines. Language differences. Cultural identity. Social perception. These are the kinds of tensions that can quietly fracture a community if left unresolved. And the early church doesn’t dismiss the concern as petty or unspiritual. They don’t tell the widows to pray harder. They don’t accuse the complainers of lacking faith. They acknowledge the problem.

This is the first lesson Acts 6 teaches us: spiritual maturity does not mean pretending problems don’t exist. It means facing them honestly.

The apostles respond with discernment, not defensiveness. They gather the full group of disciples and make a statement that has been misunderstood for centuries. They say it would not be right for them to neglect the ministry of the word of God in order to wait on tables. That line has been misused to create false hierarchies between “spiritual” work and “practical” work. But that’s not what’s happening here. The apostles are not devaluing service. They are recognizing calling.

They understand something critical: if they try to do everything, they will eventually do nothing well. Their role is prayer and the ministry of the word. That isn’t arrogance—it’s responsibility. And rather than hoarding authority, they create space for others to step into leadership.

This is where Acts 6 becomes revolutionary.

The solution isn’t to work harder. It’s to multiply leadership.

They instruct the community to choose seven men who are known to be full of the Spirit and wisdom. That detail matters. These aren’t simply volunteers with availability. They are spiritually grounded, trusted individuals. The early church doesn’t separate character from competence. They don’t say, “This is just food distribution, so anyone will do.” They recognize that serving the vulnerable requires spiritual depth.

This is where modern thinking often gets it backwards. We tend to reserve spiritual qualifications for visible roles—teaching, preaching, leading worship—while treating service roles as secondary. Acts 6 obliterates that distinction. The men chosen to oversee this responsibility are held to high spiritual standards because the work itself is sacred.

And look at what happens next. The apostles pray and lay hands on them. This is commissioning. This is affirmation. This is public recognition that service is not beneath leadership—it is leadership.

Then comes one of the most understated yet powerful lines in the chapter: “So the word of God spread.” Not because the apostles worked harder. Not because the complaints stopped. But because leadership was aligned correctly. When roles matched calling, growth resumed.

This moment is a turning point. It shows us that healthy growth requires structure, humility, and trust. The apostles trusted others to carry responsibility. The community trusted the process. And God honored that trust by continuing to expand the movement.

But Acts 6 doesn’t stop there. It introduces us to Stephen.

Stephen is one of the seven chosen, and the text immediately highlights him. He is described as a man full of God’s grace and power, performing great wonders and signs among the people. This is significant. Stephen’s assignment begins with serving tables, but his impact extends far beyond logistics. He is not limited by his role. His faith overflows into bold witness.

This is another quiet lesson of Acts 6: God often reveals our deeper calling while we are faithfully serving in what seems like a supporting role.

Stephen doesn’t seek prominence. He doesn’t demand a platform. He simply walks in obedience—and God entrusts him with influence. His wisdom and power attract attention, and not all of it is positive. Opposition arises. Arguments are made. False accusations follow. And suddenly, Stephen is at the center of conflict.

Notice the pattern. As soon as structure brings health to the church, spiritual opposition intensifies. This is not coincidence. Growth invites resistance. Faithfulness draws scrutiny. And Stephen becomes a target not because he is weak, but because he is effective.

Those who oppose him cannot stand against the wisdom the Spirit gives him. So they resort to distortion. They stir up false witnesses. They twist his words. They accuse him of blasphemy. This is the same tactic used against Jesus. When truth cannot be refuted, it is often attacked.

And yet, even in accusation, something extraordinary happens. As Stephen stands before the council, the text says his face was like the face of an angel. That is not poetic exaggeration. It is spiritual reality. In the moment of greatest pressure, Stephen reflects peace, clarity, and divine presence.

This is not the look of someone panicking. This is the look of someone anchored.

Acts 6 shows us that spiritual authority is not measured by position, but by posture. Stephen has no title beyond his assignment, yet he stands with more spiritual confidence than the religious leaders judging him. His strength doesn’t come from control. It comes from surrender.

For anyone reading this who feels overlooked, underestimated, or confined to a role that seems small, Acts 6 speaks directly to you. God sees faithfulness long before He elevates influence. He tests character in service. He refines courage in obscurity. And when the moment comes, He reveals what He has been building all along.

This chapter also challenges leaders to ask hard questions. Are we trying to do too much ourselves? Are we creating bottlenecks instead of pathways? Are we trusting others with responsibility, or are we clinging to control under the guise of faithfulness?

The apostles didn’t lose authority by delegating. They strengthened it. They didn’t weaken the church by empowering others. They stabilized it. Acts 6 is proof that shared leadership doesn’t dilute vision—it protects it.

And there is something deeply human here as well. The apostles admit limitation. They acknowledge that even good intentions can lead to neglect if structure is absent. That kind of humility is rare. But it is essential. God’s work does not require our exhaustion. It requires our obedience.

Acts 6 also reframes how we think about conflict. The complaint about the widows could have been the beginning of division. Instead, it became the birthplace of new leadership. The church didn’t collapse under pressure. It adapted under guidance. That is what healthy communities do.

Conflict is not always a sign of failure. Sometimes it is evidence of growth. The question is not whether tension will arise, but whether we will respond with wisdom or pride.

Stephen’s story reminds us that obedience does not guarantee safety, but it does guarantee purpose. He is faithful in service. He is bold in witness. And he is calm in accusation. He embodies a kind of courage that doesn’t shout. It stands.

As Acts 6 closes, the stage is set for what comes next. Stephen’s defense, his martyrdom, and the scattering of believers that will spread the gospel even further. None of that happens without this chapter. None of it happens without the decision to face internal tension honestly and respond with Spirit-led wisdom.

Acts 6 is not about food distribution. It is about alignment. It is about calling. It is about leadership that multiplies rather than controls. And it is about a God who turns logistical problems into spiritual breakthroughs.

If you are in a season where growth feels messy, where responsibilities are overwhelming, or where your faithfulness feels unnoticed, Acts 6 is speaking to you. God is not confused by complexity. He is preparing expansion.

And often, the very pressure you’re experiencing is evidence that something is about to multiply.

Acts 6 continues to speak because it refuses to separate spiritual depth from practical responsibility. The early church does not spiritualize away real needs, nor does it allow practical demands to eclipse spiritual focus. Instead, it holds both together in tension and lets wisdom determine balance. That balance is not accidental. It is cultivated. And it is costly.

One of the quiet dangers in any faith community is confusing visibility with importance. Acts 6 dismantles that illusion. The apostles are visible, but the work entrusted to the seven is just as essential. Food distribution to widows may not sound dramatic, but in God’s economy, it is sacred. It is worship expressed through consistency. It is love made tangible. And it is precisely this kind of faithfulness that God often uses as a proving ground.

The men chosen are not named for their efficiency first. They are named for their character. Full of the Spirit. Full of wisdom. Known by the community. This tells us something important: God cares deeply about who carries responsibility, not just whether responsibility gets carried. Skill can be developed. Integrity must be discerned.

In a world obsessed with credentials, Acts 6 reminds us that spiritual credibility comes from fruit, not résumé. These men were already living faithful lives before they were formally recognized. Leadership did not create their character. It revealed it.

Stephen, especially, embodies this truth. His spiritual authority is not conferred by position but confirmed by presence. When opposition arises, it is not because he is abrasive or reckless. It is because truth disrupts comfort. His wisdom exposes hollow arguments. His Spirit-filled life makes religious pretense uncomfortable.

This is one of the most sobering realities of faithful living: when truth is lived out clearly, it does not always produce admiration. Sometimes it produces resistance. Sometimes it provokes fear. And sometimes it leads to false accusations.

Stephen’s opponents do not debate him honestly. They manipulate perception. They stir emotion. They weaponize lies. This is not new. It is as old as righteousness itself. When integrity cannot be undermined, character is often attacked.

Yet Stephen’s response is not retaliation. It is composure. The description of his face like that of an angel is more than imagery. It signals something deeply spiritual. Peace is not the absence of conflict. It is the presence of God in the midst of it. Stephen stands accused, yet unshaken. Surrounded by hostility, yet inwardly secure.

This is the kind of strength that cannot be manufactured. It is formed over time through obedience, prayer, and surrender. It is cultivated in unseen moments long before it is tested in public ones.

Acts 6 also exposes a truth many leaders struggle to accept: no one calling is meant to carry everything. The apostles did not abandon service; they elevated it by entrusting it to others. They did not step back because the work was beneath them; they stepped back because the mission was bigger than any one role.

There is wisdom here for anyone who feels stretched thin, burned out, or quietly resentful. Sometimes exhaustion is not a sign of faithfulness. Sometimes it is a sign of misalignment. God does not ask us to carry what He intends to multiply through others.

Delegation in Acts 6 is not a leadership trend. It is spiritual obedience. It requires humility to admit limitation. It requires trust to release control. And it requires faith to believe that God works through others just as powerfully as He works through us.

The result of this obedience is unmistakable. The word of God continues to spread. The number of disciples increases rapidly. Even priests begin to obey the faith. This growth is not coincidental. It flows directly from alignment. When the body functions as intended, the mission advances naturally.

This chapter also reframes how we understand success in God’s work. Success is not the absence of problems. It is the faithful response to them. The early church does not avoid tension. It addresses it honestly. It does not suppress complaints. It listens to them. It does not react impulsively. It responds prayerfully.

That pattern is desperately needed today.

Acts 6 challenges modern faith communities to ask uncomfortable but necessary questions. Are we attentive to the vulnerable among us, or do they quietly fall through the cracks? Are we empowering Spirit-filled people to serve, or are we concentrating responsibility in too few hands? Are we valuing character as much as charisma?

Stephen’s story reminds us that obedience does not always lead to comfort, but it always leads to purpose. His faithfulness in a practical role becomes the platform for one of the most powerful testimonies in Scripture. His courage in Acts 6 sets the stage for the gospel’s expansion beyond Jerusalem.

And there is something deeply personal here as well. Many people wait for a “bigger calling” while neglecting the one in front of them. Acts 6 tells us that God often reveals greater purpose through faithful service in ordinary places. Stephen did not climb a ladder. He answered a need.

The chapter closes not with resolution, but with anticipation. Stephen stands before the council, radiant with God’s presence. The conflict is not over. In fact, it is just beginning. But the foundation has been laid. The church has learned how to respond to growth with wisdom. Leadership has been multiplied. Faithfulness has been recognized.

Acts 6 teaches us that God is not intimidated by complexity. He is glorified through order. He is not threatened by complaints. He is honored by humility. And He is not limited by human weakness. He uses it as the very means by which His work expands.

If you are navigating tension, responsibility, or unseen service, this chapter is for you. God sees what others overlook. He honors faithfulness long before He reveals fruit. And He is always doing more beneath the surface than we realize.

Growth may create tension.

But God creates leaders.

And He is doing it still.

Watch Douglas Vandergraph’s inspiring faith-based videos on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/@douglasvandergraph

Support the ministry by buying Douglas a coffee https://www.buymeacoffee.com/douglasvandergraph

Your friend, Douglas Vandergraph

#Acts6 #FaithfulLeadership #BiblicalReflection #ChristianGrowth #ServantLeadership #NewTestament #SpiritualWisdom #FaithInAction

Acts 5 is one of the most unsettling chapters in the New Testament, not because it introduces something foreign to the message of Jesus, but because it removes every comfortable illusion we try to place between ourselves and God. This chapter does not let us hide behind good intentions, religious language, or outward generosity. It confronts the reader with a reality most people would rather avoid: God is not impressed by appearances, and spiritual hypocrisy is not a minor flaw—it is a dangerous fracture at the center of the soul.

By the time we arrive at Acts 5, the early church is growing rapidly. Miracles are happening openly. People are being healed simply by coming near Peter. The community is marked by generosity, unity, and an intense awareness of God’s presence. This is not a casual spiritual movement. It is not a loosely organized group of people who happen to believe similar things. This is a living body animated by the Spirit of God, and everyone involved knows it.

That context matters deeply, because Acts 5 begins with a story that shocks modern readers precisely because we often read it without fully grasping the spiritual environment in which it occurs. Ananias and Sapphira do not step into an ordinary gathering. They step into a moment of extraordinary holiness, where God’s presence is not theoretical but tangible. In such an environment, pretense becomes deadly.

Ananias and Sapphira sell a piece of property. On the surface, their action mirrors the generosity we see celebrated at the end of Acts 4. Barnabas, for example, sells land and gives the proceeds to the apostles, earning trust and honor within the community. But Ananias and Sapphira are not motivated by the same heart. They want the reputation of sacrifice without the reality of surrender. They want to appear fully committed while quietly reserving control for themselves.

It is critical to understand what their sin is not. Their sin is not withholding part of the money. Peter explicitly states that the property was theirs and the proceeds were theirs to use as they wished. God never demanded total financial liquidation from every believer. The issue is not money. The issue is deception—specifically, deception aimed at God while pretending it is devotion.

When Ananias brings the partial amount and presents it as the whole, Peter does not accuse him of lying to the apostles or to the community. He accuses him of lying to the Holy Spirit. That distinction matters. This is not about violating church norms. This is about violating truth in the presence of God.

Ananias falls dead. Later, Sapphira repeats the lie, and she too dies. The response of the church is fear—great fear. Not confusion. Not debate. Fear. The kind of fear that comes when people realize they are dealing with a holy God, not a mascot for their spiritual ambitions.

Many modern readers struggle with this story because we have learned to domesticate God. We prefer a version of faith that affirms our intentions while overlooking our duplicity. Acts 5 refuses to cooperate with that version of Christianity. It declares, without apology, that God cares deeply about truth in the inner life of believers.

What makes this episode even more sobering is that it occurs within the church, not outside it. Ananias and Sapphira are not hostile outsiders mocking the faith. They are participants. They are insiders. Their sin is not rebellion but performance. And that is precisely why it is so dangerous.

Hypocrisy is not merely moral inconsistency. It is an attempt to manipulate spiritual reality by presenting a false self. In doing so, it treats God as someone who can be managed, deceived, or impressed. Acts 5 shatters that illusion. God is not fooled by religious theater. He sees the heart, and when the heart is divided, the consequences are severe.

After this moment, the chapter does not slow down or soften. Instead, it accelerates. The apostles continue performing signs and wonders among the people. Crowds grow. The sick are healed. The presence of God is undeniable. Ironically, the fear that follows the deaths of Ananias and Sapphira does not drive people away—it clarifies the boundaries of belonging.

Acts 5 tells us that believers are added to the Lord in increasing numbers, but it also notes that no one else dared join them casually. That tension is important. This is not a movement fueled by hype or emotional manipulation. It is a movement that demands sincerity. The cost of entry is not perfection, but honesty.

The apostles are arrested again. This time, the response from the authorities is more intense. They are imprisoned overnight, but an angel of the Lord opens the doors and commands them to go back to the temple and speak all the words of this life. That phrase—“all the words of this life”—is remarkable. It suggests that the gospel is not merely a message to be believed but a way of existence to be embodied.

When the apostles are brought before the council, Peter delivers one of the most defining lines in the book of Acts: “We must obey God rather than men.” This is not defiance for the sake of rebellion. It is clarity about authority. The apostles are not anarchists. They are not hostile to order. They are simply unwilling to place human approval above divine command.

The council is furious. They consider killing the apostles. At this point, Gamaliel—a respected Pharisee and teacher of the law—intervenes. His counsel is pragmatic but insightful. He reminds the council of previous movements that rose and fell. His argument is simple: if this work is of human origin, it will fail. If it is of God, opposing it is not only futile but dangerous.

Gamaliel’s words function as a mirror to the entire chapter. Acts 5 repeatedly confronts the question of origin. Are actions rooted in God or in self? Are movements driven by truth or by appearance? Are sacrifices genuine or performative? The difference determines everything.

The apostles are beaten and released, ordered once again not to speak in the name of Jesus. Their response is astonishing. They rejoice that they were counted worthy to suffer dishonor for the Name. This is not masochism. It is alignment. Their identity is so deeply rooted in obedience to God that suffering becomes confirmation, not deterrence.

Every day, in the temple and from house to house, they do not cease teaching and preaching that Jesus is the Christ. Acts 5 ends not with resolution but with momentum. The pressure increases, the cost rises, and the commitment deepens.

What emerges from this chapter is a portrait of a faith that cannot coexist with pretense. Acts 5 does not invite us to admire the early church from a safe distance. It invites us to examine our own hearts with uncomfortable honesty. It asks whether our devotion is real or staged, whether our obedience is selective or surrendered, whether we want God or merely the benefits of appearing close to Him.

This chapter draws a line—not between believers and non-believers, but between authenticity and performance. It declares that God’s presence is not neutral territory. When truth is honored, it heals, empowers, and multiplies. When truth is violated, it exposes and judges.

Acts 5 leaves us with a sobering but hopeful truth: God is not looking for flawless people, but He is uncompromising about integrity. He will not build His church on lies, even well-intentioned ones. The question it presses into every reader is not whether we are generous, faithful, or active, but whether we are honest—fully, deeply, and without reserve—before a holy God.

Acts 5 does not allow the reader to retreat into abstraction. It insists on personal application, not by issuing a checklist of behaviors, but by forcing a confrontation with motive. This chapter exposes a truth that many prefer to keep buried: the most dangerous spiritual failures are not loud rebellions but quiet compromises that wear the costume of faithfulness. What Ananias and Sapphira reveal is not greed alone, but a divided heart attempting to exist comfortably in the presence of a holy God.

The fear that falls upon the church after their deaths is often misunderstood. It is not the fear of a tyrant God waiting to strike people down for small mistakes. It is the fear that comes when people realize God is real, present, and not manageable. It is reverence restored. Awe recalibrated. The early church does not scatter in terror; it steadies itself in truth. Fear becomes a purifier, not a destroyer.

That distinction matters deeply for anyone trying to understand Acts 5 honestly. Scripture is not presenting a warning against generosity or initiative. It is issuing a warning against false selves. The problem was never that Ananias and Sapphira gave too little. The problem was that they pretended to give everything while holding something back. They attempted to stand before God with a curated version of their devotion.

That impulse did not die with them. It is alive in every era of faith. It appears whenever people speak spiritual language without spiritual surrender, whenever reputation matters more than repentance, whenever religious identity becomes a shield instead of a confession. Acts 5 does not condemn weakness; it condemns pretense. Weakness can be healed. Pretense blocks healing entirely.

As the chapter unfolds, the contrast becomes sharper. On one side, we see God working powerfully through the apostles. The sick are healed. Evil spirits are cast out. The community grows. On the other side, we see religious leaders increasingly threatened, not by disorder, but by truth. The apostles are not inciting riots or undermining society. They are simply proclaiming Jesus, and that proclamation exposes the emptiness of power structures built on control rather than truth.

The arrest of the apostles underscores another key theme in Acts 5: obedience is not theoretical. When the angel releases them from prison, he does not tell them to hide or retreat. He tells them to return to the temple and speak all the words of this life. Obedience is public. It is costly. It invites resistance. Yet it is the very thing that sustains the life of the church.

Peter’s declaration—“We must obey God rather than men”—is often quoted, but rarely absorbed in full. This is not a slogan. It is a confession that reshapes priorities, relationships, and outcomes. Obedience to God places the apostles in direct conflict with human authority, but it also places them squarely within God’s protection and purpose. The line is clear, and they do not hesitate.

The council’s rage reveals something crucial: truth threatens systems built on control. The leaders are not angry because the apostles are wrong. They are angry because the apostles are right—and because that truth exposes their role in Jesus’ death. Peter does not soften the message. He speaks plainly. God raised Jesus, whom they killed. God exalted Him. Forgiveness is available, but denial will not erase responsibility.

In the midst of this volatile moment, Gamaliel’s counsel emerges as a rare voice of restraint. His argument is not grounded in faith in Jesus, but in respect for God’s sovereignty. He recognizes a pattern: human movements collapse under their own weight. Divine movements endure despite opposition. His warning is subtle but profound—resisting God is far more dangerous than tolerating uncertainty.

This perspective reinforces the central tension of Acts 5. God cannot be manipulated, controlled, or outmaneuvered. Those who attempt to perform righteousness rather than live it are exposed. Those who attempt to suppress truth rather than submit to it are frustrated. And those who align themselves with obedience, even at great cost, find themselves sustained by something stronger than fear.

The beating of the apostles is not portrayed as a tragic failure. It is presented as a strange kind of honor. They rejoice, not because pain is good, but because suffering confirms their participation in something real. They are no longer spectators or admirers of Jesus’ message; they are participants in His mission. Their suffering places them in continuity with Christ Himself.

This reaction stands in stark contrast to modern assumptions about faith and comfort. Acts 5 dismantles the idea that obedience guarantees ease. Instead, it suggests that obedience guarantees meaning. The apostles are not protected from hardship, but they are preserved through it. Their joy is not circumstantial; it is rooted in alignment with God’s will.

Day after day, they continue teaching and preaching. Not selectively. Not cautiously. Not in secret. The phrase “they did not cease” is one of the most important summaries in the chapter. Faithfulness is not episodic. It is persistent. Acts 5 shows us a church that understands momentum does not come from clever strategy but from consistent obedience.

When read as a whole, Acts 5 forces an uncomfortable but necessary question: What kind of faith are we practicing? Is it a faith that seeks admiration, or a faith that seeks truth? Is it a faith that manages appearances, or one that surrenders control? The chapter does not invite superficial reflection. It demands self-examination.

God’s holiness in Acts 5 is not cruel; it is clarifying. It draws boundaries not to exclude people, but to preserve the integrity of what He is building. The church is not sustained by image or performance. It is sustained by truth, obedience, and reverent awareness of God’s presence.

Acts 5 does not end with resolution because faith itself does not end in comfort. It continues in tension, growth, and costly obedience. The chapter leaves us with a vision of a church that refuses to dilute truth for safety or trade obedience for approval. It is a church marked by fear of God, power of the Spirit, and courage to live honestly before both.

The warning embedded in this chapter is not meant to paralyze believers with anxiety, but to liberate them from performance. God does not require flawless devotion, but He does require real devotion. He does not demand perfection, but He does demand truth. Anything less builds a foundation that cannot hold.

Acts 5 reminds us that pretending to be holy is far more dangerous than admitting brokenness. God can work with confession. He cannot work with deception. The invitation of this chapter is not to fear God as an executioner, but to fear Him as the living, present, holy One who cannot be fooled and will not be used.

And in that fear—rightly understood—the church finds its strength, its clarity, and its unstoppable momentum.

**Your friend, Douglas Vandergraph

Watch Douglas Vandergraph’s inspiring faith-based videos on YouTube** https://www.youtube.com/@douglasvandergraph

Support the ministry by buying Douglas a coffee https://www.buymeacoffee.com/douglasvandergraph

50300-0 Gehmann diopter 0.0x, this thing works. The Monocle did not work well.

Looking forward to the new year. The team will start weekly practice. It looks like we will have some good shooters.

Today my wife and a I took a romantic trip in the red Volvo to buy groceries for new years.

It will be a celebration of the world, with Wiener nougat from Finland and French island dip mix from Sweden.

And antipasto, possibly from Italy

From the whole world

Avocado and oranges from far away

What was remarkable is that I’ve been looking for the Wiener Nougat several consecutive Christmases, but luck has eluded me; nobody likes this anymore, and I think of this guy in ”no country for old men” who doesn’t recognise the world anymore; suddenly it seems populated by green haired people with bones in their noses.

today, however, there was a single box left.

Just the one.

And I know this for a good omen.

I’ll use it to ensure the coming of a good new year.

While I celebrate the end of this one.

And that all of this were from the same little store in the middle of nowhere, it’s not lost on me

The significance.

Larry's Faves: A year of books

See all #Larrys2025Faves

I fell short of my goal of 35 books, petering out at 26. Maybe reading goals are dumb. I wrote more, listened to more music, and grew fatigued by the counting. I had a plan to finish nine more in December, then thought, 'What am I doing here?' Rethinking for 2026, maybe genre challenges? Read Beowulf?

2025 Superlatives

Best Read: Death of the Author – Nnedi Okorafor 

Runner Up: Playground – Richard Powers 

Note: Both have similar plot twists and themes 

Best Debut: Brooklyn Motto – Alex Johnson 

Best Non-Fiction: The Harder I Fight the More I Love You: A Memoir – Neko Case

For books, I don't restrict to 2025 releases; this is a list of all books consumed, in random order:

1. Red Sonja: Consumed - Gail Simone: Red Sonja done right Larry’s 100 review

2. Death of the Author - Nnedi Okorafor: Wow Larry’s 100 review

3. I Wouldn't Say It If It Wasn't True: A Memoir of Life, Music, and the Dream Syndicate - Steve Wynn: Not the casino owner

4. Where the Deer and the Antelope Play: The Pastoral Observations of One Ignorant American Who Loves to Walk Outside - Nick Offerman: Clowning on Jeff Tweedy was the highlight

5. Oathbreakers: The War of Brothers That Shattered an Empire and Made Medieval Europe - David M. Perry, Matthew Gabriele: Proving elites have always been annoying Larry’s 10 Review

6. River Kings: A New History of the Vikings from Scandinavia to the Silk Road - Cat Jarman: Academic but approachable history

7. Between Two Fires - Christopher Buehlman: Macabre historical fiction

8. The Sirens' Call: How Attention Became the World's Most Endangered Resource - Chris Hayes: Well researched and compelling, if a little obvious

9. Brooklyn Motto - Alex Johnson: Pre cell phone wonderland Larry’s 100 review

10. Careless People: A Cautionary Tale of Power, Greed, and Lost Idealism – Sarah Wynn-Williams: Dishy dystopia origin story

11. The Harder I Fight the More I Love You: A Memoir - Neko Case: Stark but resilient Larry’s 100 review

12. The Blacktongue Thief - Christopher Buehlman: My fave author discovery of 2025 Larry’s 100 review

13. Blind Owl Blues: The Mysterious Life and Death of Blues Legend Alan Wilson - Rebecca Davis: Sad ending to a fascinating Blues Rock introvert

14. Playground - Richard Powers: There and back again through the AI funhouse mirror

15. Comedy Samurai: Forty Years of Blood, Guts, and Laughter - Larry Charles: Soul searching for laughs through some TV/Movies biggest comedies

16. William Blake vs the World – John Higgs: Diary of a madman

17. The Great Courses: The Viking Age: New Perspectives on History and Culture - Jennifer Paxton: Paxton is my fave public lecturer, Folk singing Dad Tom must be proud

18. Tomorrow, and Tomorrow, and Tomorrow - Gabrielle Zevin: Twee, emo and overrated

19. The Hard Stuff: Dope, Crime, the MC5, and My Life of Impossibilities - Wayne Kramer: Ghost listen Larry’s 100 review

20. A Kiss Before Dying - Ira Levin: I am going to read a Levin a year

21. The Uncool: A Memoir - Cameron Crowe: Almost Famous: The Writer's Cut Larry’s 100 review 

22. The Conan Chronicles #1: The People of The Black Circle - Robert E. Howard: Hail Crom

23. Rumors of My Demise - Evan Dando: He can talk, and he told us Larry’s 100 review 

24. The Bloodsworn Saga #1: The Shadow of the Gods - John Gwynne: Viking X-Men

25. The Bloodsworn Saga #2: The Hunger of the Gods - John Gwynne: High gore content

26. The Bloodsworn Saga #3: The Fury of the Gods - John Gwynne: A heck of a yarn

#books #reading #2025BestOf #BookReviews #BestOfBooks #Larrys2025FavesBooks #BookRecommendations #AmReading #100WordReview #Larrys100 #100DaysToOffload #Larrys2025Faves