Want to join in? Respond to our weekly writing prompts, open to everyone.
Want to join in? Respond to our weekly writing prompts, open to everyone.
from
Rippple's Blog

Stay entertained thanks to our Weekly Tracker giving you next week's Anticipated Movies & Shows, Most Watched & Returning Favorites, and Shows Changes & Popular Trailers.
+1 War Machinenew Good Luck, Have Fun, Don't Die+7 Cold Storage-3 Shelter-1 The Housemaidnew Louis Theroux: Inside the Manosphere-4 Mercynew Crime 101-1 Zootopia 2-3 Marty Supreme= The Pitt= Paradise= The Rookie= Shrinkingnew ONE PIECE+2 High Potential+3 Marshals+1 Monarch: Legacy of Monstersnew Young Sherlocknew Star Trek: Starfleet AcademyHi, I'm Kevin 👋. I make apps and I love watching movies and TV shows. If you like what I'm doing, you can buy one of my apps, download and subscribe to Rippple for Trakt or just buy me a ko-fi ☕️.
from Lastige Gevallen in de Rede
Die onoplettende oppasser bij de kolkende lava poel de 2 walmende gebarsten kinderkopjes ten onder gaande in het opborrelend gewoel en zij dan panisch rennend om die almachtig hete brij Dat soort dingen die blijven je voor eeuwig bij
Dit soort schitterende herinneringen maak je aan door er met een draaiende camera bij te staan
De ouders die met gevoel voor drama meteen stapels nieuwe kinderen maken om zo doende door het smelten van de eersten niet van slag te raken de documentaire van hun juridische strijd om extreme gerechtigheid op het executie plein staat de hippe beul en wordt de au-pair nanny door zijn lieftallige assistentes naar het schavot podium begeleidt verderop staan mensen voor zeer hoog geprijsde executie verkoop tickets in een kilometers lange rij dat soort dingen die blijven je voor eeuwig bij
dit soort schitterende herinneringen maak je aan door er met een draaiende camera bij te staan
die beul zichzelf filmend op het vliegveld ontvangen door enthousiast gillend en zwaaiend publiek de beul zichzelf filmend in een grote wagen vol schaars geklede vrouwen, sponsor wijn en dito hip hop hoempa muziek de beul door zijn crew gefilmd bij de ingang van een zeer chique hotel die hem betaald om daar te liggen wippen en pitten de beul met het echtpaar voor zakelijk overleg in een glimmend schoon zeer riant hotel kantoor zitten daar samen de puntjes op ï en ä zetten voor de vertoning van de grote vlog massa media dood door schuld au-pair nanny executie show moord overleg eigenlijk niet voor de buitenwereld bedoeld in principe alleen zinvol voor 3 van de 4 betrokken partijen live te volgen vooral dankzij mij Dat soort dingen die blijven je voor eeuwig bij
dit soort schitterende herinneringen maak je aan door er met een draaiende camera bij te staan
De au-pair nanny per ongeluk terecht gekomen in een wereld van enkel goede schijn door een klein venstertje in haar hotel cel kijkt zij naar de drukte op het executie plein ze bedenkt een plan om aan het nadere einde van haar leven te ontkomen al slapende lukt het haar om in het lichaam van de beul te komen via een poort in hun beider dromen eenmaal daar duwt ze het wezen van de beul uit het eigen en in haar opgesloten lijf ze kan opgelucht beginnen aan haar enigste hoofdrol in het immens populaire beulse vlog bedrijf zonder sporen van een kater wakker geworden als beul van de beul heeft ze veel zin in haar eerste en laatste optreden terwijl de beul eenzaam en alleen ontwaakt met kater, droge bek, bloed neus en geslachtsziekte maar zonder camera en crew in heel ander o heden aan het eind van dag is hij dan voor een wild enthousiast publiek door toedoen van eigen lijf en dus hand rap overleden en met een paar klappen is ook de extreme juridische show strijd tussen het echtpaar en de au-pair gestreden al is dit stel na die show die avond alleen nog maar een keer vaag door een toeschouwer gezien in zeer dichte nabijheid van de kinder verzwelgende hete brij maar daar was ik zelf dus niet bij
dit is geen echte herinnering die ik met een doldraaiende camera aan kon maken als passend slot geprojecteerd in een groot zwart gat en of op een zeer strak getrokken groot wit laken
from Lastige Gevallen in de Rede
Ga er maar aan staan achteraan de rij in een lange moeizame loopbaan langzaam aan of stil maar net zoals het niet echt / echt niet wil ga er maar aan staan bij een lange tafel voor de stam en hun vrije omloopbaan jij tussen de oudsten in dienende rol langzaam aan van horen dol ga er maar aan staan zij elders en ik hier mijlen van hun daar vandaan anderen bezig in werkzaam heden en wij in moeilijk heden onze energie aan afstand besteden ga er maar aan staan gestuurd worden uit lommerrijke laan iedere dag om zeep geholpen bij de poets specialist tot je schone toekomst voor de middelen werd gewist ga er maar aan staan handje schudden na nimmer weer komen en gaan met rituelen wat is tot wezen wordt verdreven in de absurditeit van geestig leven ga er maar aan staan zo heikel het is in de periferie van de orkaan zo stil is het er binnen in zo zit ook het einde al in het begin . . . sta er maar niet aan blijf als het kan lang en gelukkig ver ver daar vandaan
from
Kroeber
Ainda no campo das metáforas nerd: com o impacto da mão, algumas peças do cubo 5x5x5 partiram-se. Outras perderam-se.
Soy la prueba de que hay vida en el espacio exterior. Esto lo vengo diciendo desde hace mucho tiempo.
A finales del siglo pasado conté varias veces mi historia a distintas revistas divulgativas y en dos entrevistas para la televisión. Algunos me creyeron, otros no.
Quiero destacar que en ese final de siglo se hicieron notar las personas incrédulas, que en pocos años fueron mayoría. Empezaron por no creer en los ovnis y terminaron vaciando las iglesias.
Al entrar a este nuevo siglo, muchas personalidades hablaron del nuevo milenio como algo esperanzador y romántico. Por eso intenté de nuevo contar mi historia: soy la prueba de que hay vida extraterrestre. No es que lo sé; es que lo soy.
Entonces descubrí lo peor. Si el fin del siglo anterior trajo una mayoría consolidada de incrédulos, en este nuevo siglo a la gente no le importa nada. Es decir, qué más da lo que alguien sea. Que siga su camino y, si puede, que no incordie.
from
Atmósferas
Digamos que hoy quisiera describir el presente: simplemente veo una pared tirando a gris, la puerta blanca, música de piano.
En segundo plano aprendo a establecer mi atención más allá del ruido, a sobrevir la conmoción.
A olvidar lo cerca que estamos de irnos al desastre, no porque lo digan, sino porque está en el aire.
Y en este presente mi corazón es más fuerte. Está lleno de amor por todos. Unos y otros, tan vulnerables, aunque lleven un misil a cuestas.
from An Open Letter
I received information against my will again today how E did indeed post kind of thirst trap pictures on her Instagram after we had broken up. And just the thought of it hurts, and I think it’s kind of because I feel a little bit possessive still? And it feels like she is so readily trying to give herself to someone else. All part of me also feels like this is directly meant to hurt me, even though I should not have known about it and I don’t think it’s necessarily reasonable to expect that either. I need to remind myself that her world does not revolve around me, and very likely she did that stuff just because she wanted to feel hot, and to get that external validation in some sense. And I can’t blame her at all for that. After a rough breakup, of course you want to feel wanted and attractive. I think I was just an unintentional crossfire in a way.
I think that’s something that kind of consistently happened through the relationship, where I would get hurt not because she tries to hurt me, but because she doesn’t understand how some of her actions or shortcomings end up putting me in very painful situations. And I mean to that point, I don’t think anyone ever really tries to hurt people, it’s just they act in what they think is their best interest. And I think in this case she just isn’t really aware enough about the world to understand a lot of the consequences of her actions. I do feel a renewed sense of peace being single in this way, I don’t need to worry about regulating another person‘s emotions, or trying to get them off of the train tracks as I see the train approaching that they want to ignore. There were a lot of nice moments of course, but there were a lot of moments where I remember feeling like wow I guess this is what love is supposed to be like, and it’s honestly a little bit disappointing. It felt like I was a caretaker a lot, and it felt like I was settling. I think for a relationship to be not as patronizing or rude to the other person, they should be someone where I feel like I was not settling for at all and that I am really lucky. And I think at the end of the day looking at what was brought to the table by both of us, I understand why she felt such volatility and why she had that constant dread and fear about me leaving. All of the questions about why I love her. Wanting to break up with me because she thought I was too good for her. And honestly I think she’s kind of right. I think she doesn’t have that full knowledge about me, and how I am loyal to a fault. I think she was often afraid that I would finally wake up or come to my senses and realize how I deserve better than her, and I would leave her. And I think that terrified her, because she did love me a lot. It’s like you have a duo that is much much better than you at the game, and you just know it’s a matter of time until they just play by themselves or play with someone closer to their rank, and leave you behind. And the worst part is I don’t think I would have. I think I would have wanted to spend my life with her, and I think I would’ve robbed myself of the happy relationship I always wanted. But I also do think from her perspective it must’ve been fucking terrifying constantly feeling like you’re not enough, partially because to be blunt she wasn’t. And I don’t mean that in a bad way, but the fact that we are in such different stages of life, the emotional gap, the intelligence gap, the differences in our social successes, and I think the list just continues. I kept telling myself that this was me suffering from success, but I think in reality this was more just a consequence of me not being strict enough on the filtering portion of dating, and not really understanding what love should look like. If you’ve been treated right, or raised well, you wouldn’t put up with a lot of stuff that feels natural to me. When she would get mad at me for me trying to advocate for myself, or when she minimize my feelings, I didn’t like it, but that is very similar to what my childhood was like. And maybe that’s just what the world is like you know? But how are you supposed to tell a kid that’s been starving their whole life that food is abundant and they won’t have to worry about a meal in the future. That’s such a foreign wish that can’t really be believed, and instead whenever you can get scraps of food, you graciously cling onto it.
In a way I feel cruel for what I did to her. I know that she did a lot of objectively bad things, and it’s not like I did shitty actions towards her, but I unknowingly threw her into the deep end. It’s like if a friend is new to a game and you throw them into a high rank game. She felt a lot of pressure constantly throughout the relationship, and I think those were because of how good of a partner I was. Or at least I would like to think that. Realistically a solid amount it was also because of her own insecurities. But at the end of the day, because there was such a gap in what we were able to provide to each other in terms of support, value, financial benefit, etc. She must have constantly felt like an imposter in a way. Like somehow she had tricked me into loving her and saying all of these right things even though she wasn’t coming close. And I think especially because she was used to bad partners in the past, suddenly having the shock of being the bad partner must have fucking hurt. I also think this might’ve been why she constantly would overexert herself or push herself past the point of what is sustainable to try to make me happy, even though I told her and I asked her not to do that. She would self sacrifice and constantly try to make me happy, often at her own cost. And the problem was when that debt would need to be collected, that was something that both of us paid. And I think all of the benefits that she would give from the self sacrifice would be wiped out by me covering the debts with interest. And I think that would only hurt her more. It’s a really rough cycle, and I almost don’t know what you can do about that if you’re in that situation. This isn’t one of those things where it’s just solely self-destructive, because at the end of the day I really do bring more to the table than she does. And I’m not saying that’s something that can’t change, but I of course financially am much better off, I am physically better off, emotionally I am better off, and these are all things that have taken me time and I’ve had to work on and maybe if I had met her when I was 20 it would’ve been a little bit closer? But she is someone that has a lot of adversity due to her genetic conditions, and is a late bloomer in life. I am very much the opposite, of a very early bloomer. And I kind of think it’s cruel that I engaged in this relationship with her, because no matter how much reassurance I give, there will always be the doubt in her head about how this is not fair and she cannot reciprocate what I give her. And it almost feels like the sword of Damocles, where she never knows when the hammer is going to drop. And it also sucks because she doesn’t have the self-awareness to be able to articulate these things or understand why she’s feeling this pressure. And it’s a really hard thing to work on a problem when you don’t even know what the problem is. And so it sucks because even if I do love her and even if she does love me, I don’t know if this relationship was just building resentment in me. Maybe at some point in the future, and it would’ve been way more painful to both of us, but maybe I would’ve then learned how I do want more from a partner. And how I do want someone that can reciprocate. It would’ve been terrible if I did end up meeting someone as a friend that was available and interested, and also someone who could reciprocate. That would’ve been horrible because it would’ve caused so much conflict with me, because obviously my desire is to be loyal to the person that I love. But it’s almost like you don’t know what you’re missing until you see it. Or maybe even just with enough time I would’ve eventually said that enough was enough and that I was done. And that would’ve fucking killed me if I was her. Imagine if you are so in love with someone so incredibly wonderful that you keep hurting, and the problem is they treat you nicer than you can treat them. You sometimes get angry or say things out of frustration, or don’t fully understand your emotions and speak in poor ways. But they don’t do the same to you, instead they consistently treat you with kindness and patience, things that you can’t really reciprocate because you’re never in that position with them. There’s someone that’s very attractive, they get along very well with your family, they’re incredibly successful and a perfect package and loves you very dearly. But you keep fucking up because you still have those wounds you haven’t worked on. And you keep hurting that person. And on one hand it hurts so badly to see the damage that you do to someone you care about so dearly, but on the other hand there’s the more selfish underlying thought of was this the final straw and have I really fucked it up for good now. And it doesn’t help that there were several moments where I felt like I didn’t know if I could keep taking it. And so that absolutely was a possibility to her. And that’s fucking terrifying. The feeling that this is a train slowly rolling out of control down a hill because you pushed it and you can’t really stop it, but you keep accidentally pushing it and every time you try to stop it it doesn’t really do enough and at some point it’s going to hit. And I think that’s why she needed to go so nuclear with the breakup. I think to her she felt like eventually this was going to catch up with her and it is something where if she is the one to finally take the punishment and end it, at least the constant not knowing is over, because that’s part of the worst portions of the whole thing. And so in a way I’m kind of thankful that it happened, because I don’t know which is a worse outcome. Me never breaking up, or me breaking up much later. I still love her as a person, and I am very thankful for the sheer amount of effort that she put in. But I do think that we are in much different stages of life, and I honestly don’t know how many times I can say that. And the same way that the most well-intentioned intern cannot work themselves into succeeding as a senior developer, she and I have differences that effort and love alone cannot change in a short amount of time. And I think I deserve to be with someone who has done that work and has shown that they are capable of that change and growth, rather than someone who put in blind effort, with no guarantees of where they will end up. Maybe if I was in that same position it would be OK, but I have put in a lot of work, and I also do have a lot of things going for me that have benefited me in a lot of ways. And because of that I think I would like to wait for someone where I feel like they can match me in that sense. I do believe that I am an exceptional person. And I don’t want to come off as vain, but I am very happy with the person that I’ve turned out to be. I think there’s been a lot of difficulty and a lot of growing pains along the way, and I think the end is not in sight either.
But ultimately I think I deserve a love that looks like the kind that I give. I think I deserve someone that listens to the gentle things unsaid, and that puts in all of this additional effort to really see me. I think I deserve someone that is gentle and can accommodate the scars that I have, by validating my feelings and being a safe person to talk to. I absolutely deserve someone that understands and respect my safety as much as their own. The same way that I would be excessively careful regarding her comfort and safety, if that would’ve been reciprocated I wouldn’t have had multiple people come into my house and gang up on me at my lowest. I deserve someone that can help stabilize me at times, the same way that I help stabilize them at times. And I deserve someone that is OK being without me, someone that has their own sense of self that is well developed and one that they love. Someone that can add value to my life and share passion and things of interest. Someone that can match me and challenge me in all of these different beautiful things the world has to offer.
I think waiting doesn’t have to drive you crazy.
from Patrimoine Médard bourgault
Ces documents sont issus d'un travail en cours d'archivage et de classement des enregistrements audio d'André Médard Bourgault, neveu de Médard Bourgault, sculpteur de Saint-Jean-Port-Joli.
André Médard a 85 ans. Il porte dans sa mémoire une connaissance intime et rare de Médard, de sa famille, de ses techniques, de son époque et de son territoire. Ces enregistrements ont été captés au fil de plusieurs rencontres, sur le domaine familial.
Les fichiers sont en cours de classement. Les résumés ci-dessous donnent un aperçu des sujets abordés dans chaque enregistrement. Les audio ne sont pas encore disponibles pour écoute publique.
Ces enregistrements ont été captés au Zoom H2 lors de rencontres informelles avec André Médard Bourgault, sur le domaine familial à Saint-Jean-Port-Joli. Les conversations n'étaient pas scriptées — André Médard parlait librement, guidé par les objets autour de lui, les pièces de la maison, le terrain. Les fichiers sont classés par lieu et par date d'enregistrement. Les résumés sont établis à l'écoute, minutage par minutage. Les approximations de dates sont signalées — André Médard lui-même reconnaissait que Médard n'était pas toujours fiable sur les années.
Les routes de terre
En 1932, les routes sont encore en terre. Un couple de Rivière-du-Loup arrive jusqu'à Saint-Jean-Port-Joli et veut acheter une sculpture. C'est la première vente de Médard Bourgault. Il en tire 2 piastres. Le Québec est en pleine crise économique. André Médard se souvient de ce que valait 2 piastres à cette époque-là.
Le village
Saint-Jean-Port-Joli dans les années 30 et 40 — les bœufs et les chevaux pour labourer, le forgeron Fortin, l'Auberge du Faubourg, les touristes américains qui arrivent l'été, Jean-Marie Gauvreau et d'autres personnages importants de l'époque. André Médard en parle comme si c'était hier.
Avant la Révolution tranquille
Dans le Québec d'avant 1960, le clergé avait son mot à dire sur tout — y compris sur la longueur du pagne des crucifix. Les fils de Médard vivaient des commandes religieuses. Médard, lui, sculptait des nus sur la grève en cachette. André Médard raconte cette tension — entre la liberté d'un père et le gagne-pain de ses fils.
Les écoles ménagères
Dans les années 30, les filles de Médard fréquentaient l'école ménagère. C'était une institution — on y apprenait à tenir une maison, à coudre, à cuisiner. André Médard raconte comment ça se passait, ce que ses sœurs y vivaient, ce que ça dit du Québec de cette époque.
Le Montcalm
Avant de sculpter, Médard était marin. Il naviguait sur le Montcalm — un brise-glace sur le Saint-Laurent — et a traversé l'Atlantique avec un équipage anglais. Ce voyage en Europe, cette vie sur le fleuve, cette façon de voir le monde — tout ça se retrouve dans son œuvre. André Médard raconte les années marines de son père.
Le clergé qui commande des sculptures religieuses aux fils pendant que le père cache ses nus sous un drap . Puis le clergé qui négocie la longueur du pagne sur les crucifix. Et finalement Médard qui arrête de cacher — il assume.
C'est toute une époque dans cette tension-là. Le Québec d'avant la Révolution tranquille raconté à travers un drap et un pagne trop court.
André Médard porte ça avec humour et affection. C'est ce qui rend ces enregistrements vivants.
Durée : 25 minutes
Son de l'horloge grand-mère — enregistrement sonore authentique de l'horloge dont André Médard parle en détail dans le fichier 27 octobre 2021.
Ambiance sonore — André Médard qui marche sur le terrain du domaine. Sons de pas.
Durée : ~7 minutes
Voici le document formaté pour write.as :
Voici le document formaté pour write.as :
Document en cours de mise à jour — Raphaël Bourgault, 2026
from
Talk to Fa
Air to my fire. Air completes the elements of nature: earth, water, wind, and fire. Air is formless. You can only feel it, yet it’s there, powerfully and unpredictably stirring and shifting things. Today, I felt the undeniable presence of a greater-than-life force through the big, big winds. They were alive. They were a message from the divine. I opened my suntanned arms and accepted the message. Thank you, I said.
from Pro327
I'm not an academic. I don't write from a library or a classroom. I write from the gut, and my gut still remembers June 25, 1996. That was the day a tanker truck packed with approximately 28,000 pounds of explosives was detonated outside the Khobar Towers housing complex in Saudi Arabia, killing 19 of my brothers in arms (13 from my unit) and wounding hundreds more. The blast was so massive it was felt 20 miles away in Bahrain. The official reports call it a terrorist attack; the survivors call it a day that “did not produce three” heroes, but thousands of victims living with the aftermath. This was the bloodiest attack on Americans between the Beirut barracks disaster and 9/11, a brutal wake-up call that our enemies were actively at war with us, even if we refused to acknowledge it.
The goal of the attackers, who claimed responsibility in the wake of a similar bombing in Riyadh, was simple: to force the United States Armed Forces to leave the region. They failed to break our military's spirit, but they succeeded in planting a seed of understanding in my mind that has grown ever since. This writing is the fruit of that understanding; a layman's look at the conquer and control ideology that fuels such attacks, and the suicidal denial of the West that invites them to our shores.
New York didn't forget 9/11, but it has been brainwashed. The city, like the rest of the West, has been duped by the mainstream press and a corrupt political class into believing Islam is a “religion of peace.” It's not. It's a conquer and control ideology, and the evidence is right in front of us.
Less than 25 years after 3,000 Americans were slaughtered in the name of Allah, the same city government is hosting official Ramadan iftars where “Allahu Akbar”, the battle cry of terrorists, is echoed through the halls of power. American flags stand by like mute bystanders to this act of surrender. This isn't inclusion; it's submission.
And it's happening in the context of a constant, undeniable threat. Just days before this official celebration, authorities arrested ISIS-inspired terrorists plotting to bomb an anti-Islam gathering right near Gracie Mansion. The enemy is literally at the gates, and our leaders are rolling out the welcome mat for the ideology that fuels them.
The reason this is happening is that we've been fed a historical lie our entire lives. We rarely hear about the centuries of Islamic atrocities in conquered countries. We're not taught about how Muslim armies conquered two-thirds of the Christian world through brutal warfare long before the Crusades were even thought of. All we hear about is how bad the Crusaders were, framed as some unprovoked act of Christian aggression when they were a delayed response to 450 years of Islamic expansion. When politicians like Clinton and Obama frame 9/11 as “blowback” for the Crusades, they're promoting a false narrative that ignores 1,400 years of Islamic expansion. The West didn't start this conflict, and it's time we stopped apologizing for defending ourselves.
The Quran commands this conquest. Sura 9:29 tells Muslims to fight non-believers “until they pay tribute out of hand and are utterly subdued.” This is a blueprint for permanent warfare until the world submits to Islamic rule. But it goes even deeper. The Quran promises rewards for those who die in conquest, with Sura 4:74 declaring: “Fight for the cause of [Allah]; whether they die or conquer, we shall richly reward them.” This spiritual incentive, combined with the promise of Paradise for martyrs, has historically motivated Islamic expansion.
What's particularly telling is how the Quran's teachings evolved. The earlier “Meccan” verses tend to be more peaceful, while the later “Medinan” verses, revealed after Muhammad gained military power are far more violent and expansionist. Muslim scholars developed the doctrine of “abrogation” to explain this, teaching that Allah's later revelations override earlier ones. This means the violent verses effectively cancel out the peaceful ones. The Quran even criticizes Muslims who are reluctant to fight, condemning “hypocrites” who question why warfare was ordained for them, essentially saying there’s no valid excuse not to engage in jihad.
While some modern Muslims argue these verses only apply to defensive warfare, the historical record and dominant Islamic scholarship show otherwise. The traditional view held that offensive warfare to expand “Dar Al-Islam” (the domain of Islam) was completely permissible. The early Islamic conquests weren't accidents, they were direct implementations of these Quranic commands. This is why Muslim armies rapidly conquered vast territories from Spain to India within just a century of Muhammad's death.
The media whitewashes all of this while exaggerating every Christian sin from a thousand years ago. They sell us a fantasy version of Islam while demanding we feel guilty for our own civilization's history of self-defense.
This isn't just a New York problem; it's a preview of what's coming to cities across America. Look at Minneapolis-St. Paul, where a massive Somali refugee population has created enclaves so dominated by Islamic culture that law enforcement admits they struggle to penetrate them. The area has become a known recruiting ground for foreign terror groups like al-Shabaab, sending dozens of fighters back to Africa to wage jihad. The city's response? Electing a pro-Sharia, anti-Israel congressman who embodies the “America last” ideology.
Or consider the case of Epic, Texas, a small town that is making headlines when it was effectively taken over by a Muslim community that established its own private Islamic school and governance structures, isolating itself from the broader community and American norms. This is the Islamic model: create autonomous zones, apply pressure on local institutions, and slowly erode the host culture from within until it becomes unrecognizable.
New York voters chose this path. They traded security and American traditions for the warm, fuzzy feeling of “multiculturalism” even if that very multiculturalism erodes the foundations of our nation.
Until the silent majority awakens from this politically correct stupor, expect more of the same. More official Islamic prayers in the halls that should be defending us, more terror plots thwarted by the hour, and more of our symbols and safety sacrificed on the altar of inclusion. What's happening in New York, Minneapolis, and small towns across America isn't an accident; it's an invasion. Wake up, America.
from
Florida Homeowners Association Terror

When your Homeowners Association reigns their terror upon you, maintaining employment may become [more] difficult. Once your HOA chooses you, you become a never ending target for various community violations (the same violations you see throughout the neighborhood so you know you’re not alone in that aspect). Email threats. Attorney threats through the mail. Then, judicial threats. All of these wreak havoc on the stability you once had. And losing your job is the last thing you need when most of your problems are monetary. Poverty is punishing…and so is your HOA.
According to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), more than one in four adults have disabilities. Many of those adults have invisible disabilities—meaning you cannot plainly see their disabilities like you may be able to see cerebral palsy, Down Syndrome, or limb amputations. Getting and maintaining employment with a disability can be complex, and some employers are less than friendly to people with certain disabilities because they do not understand them and their impact on employees. If you have a disability, the Department of Education Division of Vocational Rehabilitation (VR) may be of assistance.
VR helps people with disabilities find compatible jobs and seek accommodations. Many people learn about VR when they have children in special education in public schools. But you don’t have to be a child, have a child, or be or connected to any school. Grown people with grown people problems can get help. Apply today to find out the services they offer. VR has helped me changed my life on two separate occasions. And I am so thankful for them and what they have made possible for me at my lowest points.
See also:
Surviving the Homeowners Association: Food Assistance
Surviving the Homeowners Association: Unemployment Compensation
from
SmarterArticles

She is 25 years old, lives in Barcelona, has pink hair, and earns up to ten thousand euros a month from brand partnerships with companies including Amazon and Razer. She has never eaten a meal, never taken a breath, and never existed outside the rendering pipelines of a creative agency called The Clueless. Her name is Aitana Lopez, and she represents something that should unsettle anyone who makes a living by being themselves on the internet.
Aitana is not an anomaly. She is a data point on an exponential curve. The global virtual influencer market, valued at approximately 6.06 billion US dollars in 2024 according to Grand View Research, is projected to reach 45.88 billion dollars by 2030, growing at a compound annual growth rate of 40.8 per cent. Chief marketing officers are expected to allocate 30 per cent of their influencer marketing budgets to virtual influencers by 2026. The synthetic faces are arriving, and they are arriving fast.
But here is the question that the marketing projections do not answer, the one that sits at the uncomfortable intersection of technology, psychology, and economics: if AI can create perfect, tireless digital influencers that never make mistakes or demand higher pay, what happens to human creators and the authentic human connection that audiences seek from content creators?
The answer, it turns out, is considerably more complicated than the headlines suggest.
The modern virtual influencer industry traces its most visible origins to 2016, when a Los Angeles startup called Brud introduced Lil Miquela to Instagram. Presented as a 19-year-old Brazilian-American model and musician, Miquela accumulated millions of followers and secured brand partnerships with Prada, Calvin Klein, Samsung, and dozens of other companies. TIME magazine named her one of the 25 most influential people on the internet in 2018, alongside BTS and Rihanna. Her creators at Brud attracted approximately 30 million dollars in investment from firms including Sequoia Capital and Spark Capital, earning a valuation of approximately 125 million dollars before being acquired by Dapper Labs in 2021. By some estimates, Lil Miquela has generated over 10 million dollars in revenue, charging around 10,000 dollars per sponsored Instagram post.
Then came Noonoouri, the animated avatar created by Munich-based graphic designer Joerg Zuber in 2018. With her exaggerated doll-like features and impossibly large eyes, Noonoouri made no pretence of being human. Yet Dior trusted her enough to grant an Instagram takeover for their Cruise Makeup collection. She went on to partner with Versace, Marc Jacobs, Burberry, Balenciaga, and Kim Kardashian's beauty and fashion lines. The modelling agency IMG, which has represented Gigi Hadid and Bella Hadid, signed her to their roster. In 2023, Warner Music gave Noonoouri a record deal, making her the first strictly digital popstar signed to a major label.
The economics that drive this expansion are bluntly logical. Ruben Cruz, founder of The Clueless and creator of Aitana Lopez, explained his rationale to Euronews in 2024. “We started analysing how we were working and realised that many projects were being put on hold or cancelled due to problems beyond our control. Often it was the fault of the influencer or model and not due to design issues.” The solution, in his view, was to build an influencer who would never be late, never cause a scandal, and never renegotiate her fee.
This calculus appeals to brands for reasons that extend beyond mere cost savings. Virtual influencers offer what marketing professionals call “brand safety” in its purest form. They cannot be photographed at a competitor's event. They will not post an ill-considered political opinion at three in the morning. They will not age out of their target demographic, gain weight, or develop substance abuse problems. They are, in the language of corporate risk management, perfectly controllable assets.
And the data suggests that audiences are, at least superficially, responding. According to HypeAuditor, virtual influencers generate engagement rates approximately three times higher than their human counterparts, with an average of 2.84 per cent compared to 1.72 per cent for human influencers. Virtual influencer campaigns in 2023 achieved an average engagement rate of 5.9 per cent, triple the 1.9 per cent recorded for campaigns featuring real people.
Yet this headline figure conceals a crucial nuance. When it comes to sponsored content specifically, human influencers achieve 2.7 times more engagement than their AI counterparts. Lil Miquela's BMW campaign, for instance, generated an average engagement rate of just 0.6 per cent, compared to the 3.6 per cent delivered by human creators working with the same brand. The implication is that whilst virtual influencers may attract curiosity, human creators still hold a measurable advantage when the goal is to convert attention into commercial action.
For the estimated 50 million people worldwide who consider themselves professional content creators, these numbers are not merely interesting. They are existential.
The creator economy in 2025, valued at approximately 191 billion dollars and projected to grow to 528 billion dollars by 2030, is simultaneously booming and fracturing. The total market is expanding, but the share available to individual human creators is under unprecedented pressure. A 93 per cent year-over-year increase in the number of people creating user-generated content has intensified competition at every level. Among full-time creators, 52 per cent report a noticeable decline in consumer spending on affiliate-linked products. Among part-time creators, 40 per cent cite falling brand commissions and fewer sponsorship opportunities.
The threat is not limited to influencers in the traditional sense. A landmark study published in December 2024 by CISAC, the International Confederation of Societies of Authors and Composers representing over five million creators globally, provided the first comprehensive economic modelling of generative AI's impact on creative professions. Conducted by PMP Strategy, the study projected that music creators will see 24 per cent of their revenues at risk of loss by 2028, whilst audiovisual creators face a 21 per cent revenue risk over the same period. The cumulative financial impact amounts to an estimated 22 billion euros over five years: 10 billion euros in music and 12 billion euros in audiovisual production.
The study found that the market for AI-generated music and audiovisual content is expected to grow from approximately 3 billion euros to 64 billion euros by 2028. Generative AI music alone is projected to account for roughly 20 per cent of traditional music streaming platforms' revenues and around 60 per cent of music libraries' revenues by that date. Translators and adaptors for dubbing and subtitling face the most severe displacement, with 56 per cent of their revenue at risk, whilst screenwriters and directors could see their income cannibalised by 15 to 20 per cent.
Perhaps most strikingly, the CISAC study noted that not a single AI developer had signed a licensing agreement with any of the 225 collective management organisations that represent creators worldwide. The value transfer, in other words, is flowing in one direction: from human creators to the technology companies building the systems that will compete with them.
For content creators operating on platforms like Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube, the competitive dynamics are subtler but no less consequential. AI-generated content can be produced at a fraction of the cost and at a pace that no human can match. A virtual influencer does not need sleep, does not require a production crew, and can generate dozens of posts per day across multiple platforms simultaneously. The marginal cost of producing one more piece of content approaches zero. For a human creator who must plan, shoot, edit, and publish content whilst also managing brand relationships, responding to comments, and maintaining some semblance of a personal life, the asymmetry is stark.
The conventional wisdom holds that audiences will always prefer “authentic” human connection over synthetic perfection. The research suggests this is true, but with caveats that should concern anyone who relies on conventional wisdom for comfort.
A 2025 survey from the Influencer Marketing Factory found that only 15 per cent of consumers express high trust in AI influencers, whilst nearly half say they are less likely to trust content from a virtual influencer compared to a human one. In a study conducted by Baringa, 77 per cent of respondents said they would want to know if content had been created by AI, either wholly or partially. Only 12 per cent said they would not care.
The trust penalty for AI-generated content is measurable and consistent across studies. Research from the Nuremberg Institute for Market Decisions published in 2025 found that simply labelling an advertisement as AI-generated made consumers perceive it as less natural and less useful, which lowered both their attitudes towards the advertisement and their willingness to research or purchase the product. Approximately 62 per cent of consumers reported being less likely to engage with or trust social media content they knew was generated by AI.
And yet, the picture is not quite so simple. The same research ecosystem reveals contradictions that complicate the “authenticity always wins” narrative. A study of TikTok users in the Middle East published in Discover Sustainability found that AI influencers can establish meaningful emotional bonds and credibility, sometimes outperforming human influencers in generating community cohesion and network expansion. Research published in Psychology and Marketing found that followers respond to virtual influencers in ways that mirror their responses to human creators, with engagement rates and measures of trust and source credibility that rival those of their flesh-and-blood counterparts.
The generational divide is particularly telling. Virtual influencers appeal more to Gen Z consumers, who have grown up immersed in AI-enabled technologies and may not share older generations' preoccupation with the notion of authenticity as it has traditionally been understood. When the distinction between “real” and “constructed” has been blurred since childhood (by filters, by avatars, by curated social media personas that bear only passing resemblance to the people behind them), the arrival of an explicitly artificial influencer may feel less like a violation and more like an honest acknowledgement of what social media has always been.
There is a deeper irony here. The “authenticity” that human influencers claim as their competitive advantage has always been, to a significant degree, performative. The casual photograph that required forty takes. The “unfiltered” video that was carefully scripted. The “honest review” that was contractually obligated to include three positive talking points about the sponsoring brand. If authenticity is already a construction, does it matter whether the constructor is carbon-based or silicon-based?
The answer, according to the psychology of parasocial relationships, is more nuanced than a simple yes or no.
Parasocial relationships, the one-sided emotional connections that audiences form with media figures, have been studied by psychologists since Donald Horton and Richard Wohl first described the phenomenon in 1956. Originally applied to television presenters and film stars, the concept has found renewed relevance in the age of social media, where the perceived intimacy between creator and audience is amplified by direct messaging, live streaming, and the illusion of personal access.
The question of whether parasocial relationships can form with virtual influencers has been the subject of intense academic investigation. A preregistered experiment published in New Media and Society by Stein, Breves, and Anders in 2024 found that viewers' parasocial interactions did not differ significantly between a human influencer and a virtual one. However, the researchers identified what they called “opposing effects”: whilst a direct effect suggested stronger parasocial interactions with the virtual influencer, participants simultaneously attributed this persona with less mental human-likeness and less perceived similarity to themselves. These two forces partially cancelled each other out.
Research published in the Journal of Business Research by Liu and Wang in 2025 added another layer of complexity through the lens of the uncanny valley. Studying 826 Instagram users, they found that as virtual influencers become more humanlike, they often trigger psychological unease and eeriness. This discomfort intensifies when consumers deeply engage with virtual influencer content whilst remaining aware of its artificial nature, potentially diminishing the strength of parasocial relationships at precisely the moment when the technology becomes most convincing.
The implications are paradoxical. Virtual influencers that look obviously artificial (like Noonoouri, with her cartoonish proportions) may actually generate stronger parasocial bonds than those designed for photorealism, because they do not trigger the uncanny valley response. The more a virtual influencer tries to pass as human, the more its artificiality may repel the audience it seeks to attract.
But there is a counter-trend that complicates this analysis. Newer AI systems are becoming sophisticated enough to generate personalised responses, to adapt their communication styles based on audience feedback, and to create the impression of genuine emotional reciprocity. Research on AI influencer marketing has explored the potential of what scholars call “Dynamic Emotional Resonance” and “AI-Driven Attachment Styles,” whereby artificial systems learn to mirror the emotional patterns that foster deep parasocial bonds. If an AI influencer can respond to your comment in a way that feels personally meaningful, if it can remember your previous interactions and reference them naturally, if it can adapt its tone and content to your individual preferences, the distinction between “real” and “artificial” connection becomes increasingly difficult to maintain.
This is where the question stops being about marketing and starts being about something more fundamental. If the feeling of connection is indistinguishable from genuine connection, does the distinction matter? The answer depends entirely on what you believe connection is for.
The competitive landscape between human and AI creators is not shaped solely by audience preferences. It is shaped, to a significant degree, by the platforms themselves and the algorithms that determine what content gets seen.
Research from Cornell University by Brooke Erin Duffy and Colten Meisner, based on interviews with 30 creators across TikTok, Instagram, Twitch, YouTube, and Twitter, found that creators invest significant labour in understanding the algorithms that govern their visibility. Because many creators operate across multiple platforms, they must learn the hidden rules for each one and adapt their entire approach to content production accordingly. The algorithms are not neutral arbiters; they are designed to maximise engagement, and they reward content that keeps users on the platform regardless of whether that content was produced by a human being or a rendering engine.
TikTok's algorithm, in particular, is designed for what engineers call “cold start” optimisation: it tests new content with small groups of users and, if those users engage, pushes it to progressively larger audiences. This design theoretically levels the playing field between established creators and newcomers. But it also means that content which is optimised for algorithmic engagement (consistent posting frequency, precise timing, trending audio, specific visual patterns) has an inherent advantage over content that prioritises the messy, unpredictable qualities that make human creators distinctive.
AI-generated content, by its nature, can be optimised for algorithmic preference with a precision that human creators cannot match. It can be produced at the exact frequency, length, and format that the algorithm rewards. It can incorporate trending elements within minutes of their emergence. It can A/B test variations of the same content simultaneously, learning in real time which version generates the most engagement. The algorithm does not care whether the content was made by a person or a process. It cares about watch time, completion rates, shares, and comments.
This creates a structural disadvantage for human creators that exists independently of audience preferences. Even if audiences prefer human-created content when given a clear choice, they may never be given that choice if the algorithm surfaces AI-generated content more frequently because it performs better on the metrics that platforms optimise for.
The research on algorithmic bias adds another dimension. Marc Faddoul, an AI researcher at UC Berkeley's School of Information, demonstrated that TikTok's recommendation algorithm would suggest accounts with profile pictures matching the same race, age, and facial characteristics as accounts a user already followed. The algorithm creates feedback loops in which certain types of content (and certain types of faces) are amplified whilst others are suppressed. If AI-generated influencers are designed to embody the physical characteristics that algorithms have historically amplified (conventionally attractive, often white, always polished), they may receive a structural boost that compounds their other advantages.
Regulators are beginning to grapple with the implications, though the pace of regulatory development lags considerably behind the pace of technological deployment.
In the United States, the Federal Trade Commission updated its Endorsement Guides in June 2023 to explicitly cover virtual influencers and AI-generated content. The FTC's position is that AI-generated personas must follow the same disclosure rules as human endorsers. If a virtual influencer promotes a product, both the sponsorship and the involvement of AI must be disclosed. In June 2025, the FTC proposed rules recasting any marketing mention (including promotional codes, affiliate links, and brand tags) as paid endorsements requiring “clear and conspicuous” disclosure. The FTC put 670 companies on notice in 2023 alone, and enforcement actions in 2024 resulted in 337.3 million dollars being returned to consumers.
The European Union has gone further. Article 50 of the EU AI Act, now in phased enforcement, establishes what are arguably the world's most explicit transparency obligations for synthetic media. Providers and users of AI systems that generate or substantially manipulate images, audio, or video must ensure that such content is clearly identifiable as artificial. Violations can attract penalties of up to 15 million euros or 3 per cent of global annual turnover, whichever is higher. Full compliance is expected by August 2026.
In the United Kingdom, the Advertising Standards Authority issued guidance in May 2025 clarifying that AI use in advertising must be disclosed when it could mislead consumers about authenticity or performance. At the state level in the United States, California passed AB 2655 in 2024, requiring large online platforms to label or remove deceptive AI content, and AB 1836, which mandates disclosure and consent when AI recreates a person's image or voice for commercial use.
These regulatory frameworks address transparency but do not address the underlying competitive dynamics. Requiring disclosure that an influencer is AI-generated does not prevent that influencer from capturing market share from human creators. In fact, some research suggests that disclosure might have limited impact on purchasing behaviour. A study from the Influencer Marketing Factory found that 76 per cent of consumers trust AI influencers for product recommendations, even when they know the influencer is not human. The trust penalty, whilst real, may not be large enough to offset the cost and consistency advantages that AI influencers offer to brands.
There is also a growing concern about what happens when regulation cannot keep pace. The distinction between “AI-generated” and “AI-assisted” content is already blurring. If a human creator uses AI tools to write scripts, generate images, edit video, and optimise posting schedules, is the resulting content “human” or “AI”? Where is the line? And who draws it?
Despite the competitive pressures, there are reasons to believe that human creators will not be rendered obsolete. The research consistently identifies what might be called an “authenticity premium,” a measurable preference for human-created content that persists even as AI capabilities improve.
Getty Images reported in 2025 that nearly 90 per cent of consumers want transparency about whether images are AI-generated, and 98 per cent agree that authentic images and videos are pivotal in establishing trust. AI content that includes human strategic oversight performs 4.1 times better than fully automated output, according to industry benchmarking data. And 73 per cent of marketers who use AI employ a hybrid approach in which human editors polish AI-generated drafts rather than publishing them unmodified.
The share of consumers who view generative AI as a negative disruptor in the creator economy has nearly doubled since November 2023, jumping from 18 per cent to 32 per cent according to a July 2025 survey from Billion Dollar Boy and Censuswide. Half of surveyed consumers can now correctly identify AI-generated content, and when they do, approximately 52 per cent report reduced engagement. There is a further complication: despite growing confidence in their ability to spot AI content, consumers are remarkably poor at actually doing so. Research found that participants correctly identified AI-generated images only 31 per cent of the time in 2025, a figure worse than a coin toss, even as 43 per cent rated themselves as “very” or “fairly” confident in their detection abilities.
These numbers suggest that the market for genuine human connection is not disappearing. It may, however, be restructuring. The most likely outcome is not a binary replacement of human creators by AI counterparts, but rather a stratification. Premium human creators with distinctive voices, genuine expertise, and documented lived experience will command an authenticity premium that AI cannot replicate. Meanwhile, the vast middle tier of content creators producing generic lifestyle, beauty, fitness, and product review content will face the most severe competitive pressure from AI alternatives that can produce similar material at lower cost and higher volume.
This stratification carries uncomfortable implications for equity and access. The creator economy has been, for all its flaws, a pathway to economic independence for people who lacked access to traditional media gatekeepers. If AI competition pushes out the middle tier whilst preserving the top, it reinforces existing hierarchies rather than disrupting them. The creators most vulnerable to AI displacement are likely to be those who are already marginalised: creators in developing markets, creators from underrepresented communities, creators who lack the resources to invest in the production quality and personal branding required to compete at the premium tier.
Beyond economics, the rise of AI influencers raises cultural questions that resist quantification. What does it mean for a generation to form their deepest parasocial bonds with entities that have no inner life? What happens to our collective understanding of beauty when the most visible “people” on our screens are designed to embody algorithmically optimised physical ideals? What is lost when imperfection, the quality that makes human connection meaningful, is engineered out of the media landscape?
The criticism levelled at Aitana Lopez is instructive. Critics have noted that her hyper-polished body reinforces unrealistic beauty standards, particularly for young audiences. Others have pointed out that AI influencers risk displacing real creators, especially women who rely on appearance-based income. These concerns echo decades of feminist critique about media representation, but with a new dimension: the standards are now set not by retouched photographs of real people but by entirely fabricated beings who were never imperfect to begin with.
There is something philosophically disquieting about a media ecosystem in which the most influential voices belong to entities that have never experienced the conditions they discuss. An AI fitness influencer that has never felt the burn of a difficult workout. An AI travel influencer that has never been lost in a foreign city. An AI wellness influencer that has never struggled with mental health. The content may be technically competent, even engaging. But it is hollow in a way that matters, because the authority of a creator has always derived, at least in part, from the credibility of lived experience.
Checkr's 2025 consumer trust report captured a sentiment that may define the coming era. When asked what scares them most about AI-generated content, 39 per cent of Americans said their primary fear is simply not knowing what is real anymore, whether in news, photographs, or video. This concern outranked fears about financial scams, identity theft, and political manipulation. The erosion of shared reality is, for a significant portion of the population, the most troubling consequence of synthetic media's ascendance.
The future of the creator economy will not be determined by technology alone. It will be shaped by the choices that platforms, regulators, brands, and audiences make in the next several years.
Platforms could choose to label AI-generated content prominently and adjust their algorithms to ensure that human creators are not structurally disadvantaged. They could create separate categories for virtual and human influencers, giving audiences the information they need to make informed choices about the content they consume. Whether they will make these choices, given that AI content tends to drive higher engagement metrics, is another matter entirely.
Regulators could move beyond transparency requirements to establish substantive protections for human creators. The CISAC study's recommendation that policymakers act urgently to safeguard human creators, ensure they can exercise their legal rights, and demand transparency from AI services represents one possible direction. But regulation that restricts AI deployment risks being characterised as anti-innovation, and in the current political climate of many major markets, that is not a label that legislators are eager to attract.
Brands, for their part, will follow the data. If AI influencers deliver comparable or superior return on investment at lower cost, the economic logic of shifting budgets towards synthetic creators is compelling. The 52.8 per cent of marketers who believe virtual influencers will significantly shape the future of marketing are not making a prediction about technology. They are making a prediction about their own spending decisions.
And audiences, the supposed arbiters of authenticity, will continue to send mixed signals. They will say they prefer human creators whilst engaging enthusiastically with AI-generated content. They will demand transparency about AI involvement whilst following virtual influencers in growing numbers. They will express concern about the erosion of authenticity whilst applying filters to their own photographs and curating their own online personas with meticulous care.
The tension between human imperfection and synthetic perfection is not new. It is the latest iteration of a conflict that has accompanied every major media technology, from the airbrush to Photoshop to Instagram filters. What is new is the scale, the speed, and the degree to which the technology threatens not just to supplement human creators but to make certain categories of human creation economically unviable.
The creators who will thrive in this landscape are those who offer something that cannot be replicated by an algorithm: genuine vulnerability, hard-won expertise, the willingness to be wrong in public, the capacity to change their minds, the evidence of a life actually lived. These qualities have always been the foundation of the most compelling creative work. The arrival of AI influencers does not diminish their value. If anything, it clarifies it.
The question is whether the economic structures of the creator economy will continue to reward those qualities, or whether the relentless logic of cost optimisation, algorithmic preference, and synthetic perfection will squeeze them to the margins.
We are about to find out.
Grand View Research. “Virtual Influencer Market Size and Share, Industry Report, 2030.” Available at: https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/virtual-influencer-market-report
Straits Research. “Virtual Influencer Market Size, Growth and Demand Forecast by 2033.” Available at: https://straitsresearch.com/report/virtual-influencer-market
Euronews. “Meet the Spanish AI model earning up to 10,000 euros a month.” December 2024. Available at: https://www.euronews.com/next/2024/12/27/meet-the-first-spanish-ai-model-earning-up-to-10000-per-month
Supercar Blondie. “AI influencer Lil Miquela charges 10,000 dollars per Instagram post.” Available at: https://supercarblondie.com/ai-influencer-lil-miquela/
Virtual Humans. “Who is Miquela Sousa?” Available at: https://www.virtualhumans.org/human/miquela-sousa
Hypebeast. “Warner Music Signs Record Deal With AI-Generated Popstar, Noonoouri.” September 2023. Available at: https://hypebeast.com/2023/9/warner-music-signs-record-deal-ai-generated-popstar-noonoouri-artificial-intelligence
Virtual Humans. “Noonoouri: Fashion Icon Turned Pop Star.” Available at: https://www.virtualhumans.org/article/noonoouri-fashion-icon-turned-pop-star
CISAC. “Global economic study shows human creators' future at risk from generative AI.” December 2024. Available at: https://www.cisac.org/Newsroom/news-releases/global-economic-study-shows-human-creators-future-risk-generative-ai
Music Business Worldwide. “Market for Gen AI outputs to be worth over 16 billion euros annually by 2028.” December 2024. Available at: https://www.musicbusinessworldwide.com/market-for-gen-ai-outputs-to-be-worth-over-16bn-annually-by-2028-but-it-could-cannibalize-24-of-music-creators-revenues-cisac-predicts/
WebProNews. “2025 Creator Economy Booms to 191 Billion Amid AI Threats and Ethical Challenges.” Available at: https://www.webpronews.com/2025-creator-economy-booms-to-191b-amid-ai-threats-and-ethical-challenges/
Stein, J-P., Breves, P. L., and Anders, N. “Parasocial interactions with real and virtual influencers: The role of perceived similarity and human-likeness.” New Media and Society, 2024. Available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/14614448221102900
Liu and Wang. “Fostering Parasocial Relationships with Virtual Influencers in the Uncanny Valley: Anthropomorphism, Autonomy, and a Multigroup Comparison.” Journal of Business Research, 2025. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0148296324005289
Nuremberg Institute for Market Decisions. “Consumer attitudes toward AI-generated marketing content.” 2025. Available at: https://www.nim.org/en/publications/detail/transparency-without-trust
Baringa. “Trust: transparency earns trust.” 2025. Available at: https://www.baringa.com/en/insights/balancing-human-tech-ai/trust/
Influencer Marketing Factory. “Virtual Influencers Survey.” Available at: https://theinfluencermarketingfactory.com/virtual-influencers-survey-infographic/
The European Commission. “Code of Practice on marking and labelling of AI-generated content.” Available at: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/code-practice-ai-generated-content
FTC. “FTC Guidelines for Influencers.” Updated 2025. Available at: https://inbeat.agency/blog/ftc-guidelines-for-influencers
Checkr. “America's Consumer Trust Crisis in the AI Era.” 2025. Available at: https://checkr.com/resources/articles/the-great-untrust-consumer-report-2025
Getty Images. “Nearly 90 per cent of Consumers Want Transparency on AI Images.” 2025. Available at: https://newsroom.gettyimages.com/en/getty-images/nearly-90-of-consumers-want-transparency-on-ai-images-finds-getty-images-report
SmythOS. “The AI Content Trust Gap: Why 73 per cent of Consumers Can Spot and Reject AI-Generated Marketing.” Available at: https://smythos.com/thought-leadership/the-ai-content-trust-gap-why-73-of-consumers-can-spot-and-reject-ai-generated-marketing/
Hello Partner. “76 per cent of Consumers Trust AI Influencers for Products.” November 2025. Available at: https://hellopartner.com/2025/11/14/76-of-consumers-trust-ai-influencers-for-products-should-creators-be-worried/
Faddoul, M. UC Berkeley School of Information. Research on TikTok algorithmic bias. Available at: https://www.ischool.berkeley.edu/news/2020/alumnus-marc-faddoul-discovers-racial-biases-tiktoks-algorithm
Duffy, B. E. and Meisner, C. Cornell University. Research on creator experiences with platform algorithms. Referenced in MIT Technology Review, 2022. Available at: https://www.technologyreview.com/2022/07/14/1055906/tiktok-influencers-moderation-bias/
Emarketer. “Consumer skepticism of AI in the creator economy is surging.” 2025. Available at: https://www.emarketer.com/content/consumer-skepticism-of-ai-creator-economy-surging
Euronews. “A quarter of musician revenue to be lost to AI by 2028, new study finds.” December 2024. Available at: https://www.euronews.com/culture/2024/12/05/a-quarter-of-musician-revenue-to-be-lost-to-ai-by-2028-new-study-finds

Tim Green UK-based Systems Theorist & Independent Technology Writer
Tim explores the intersections of artificial intelligence, decentralised cognition, and posthuman ethics. His work, published at smarterarticles.co.uk, challenges dominant narratives of technological progress while proposing interdisciplinary frameworks for collective intelligence and digital stewardship.
His writing has been featured on Ground News and shared by independent researchers across both academic and technological communities.
ORCID: 0009-0002-0156-9795 Email: tim@smarterarticles.co.uk
from
Roscoe's Story
In Summary: * Currently watching “The LiUNA! NASCAR O'Reilly Auto Parts Series race (200 laps, 300 miles)” on CW. I came into this race very early in its 1st Stage shortly after finishing the Purdue / UCLA game, and am really enjoying it. It's being run at the Las Vegas Motor Speedway under beautiful weather. I'll probably stay with this race until it ends, then relax my way into an early bedtime.
Prayers, etc.: * I have a daily prayer regimen I try to follow throughout the day from early morning, as soon as I roll out of bed, until head hits pillow at night. Details of that regimen are linked to my link tree, which is linked to my profile page here.
Starting Ash Wednesday, 2026, I've added this daily prayer as part of the Prayer Crusade Preceding the 2026 SSPX Episcopal Consecrations.
Health Metrics: * bw= 228,62 lbs. * bp= 154/91 (64)
Exercise: * morning stretches, balance exercises, kegel pelvic floor exercises, half squats, calf raises, wall push-ups
Diet: * 08:40 – 1 banana * 09:40 – 1 cheese sandwich * 11:10 – 1 dozen pork tamales * 12:45 – 1 fresh apple
Activities, Chores, etc.: * 08:00 – bank accounts activity monitored * 08:30 – read, write, pray, follow news reports from various sources, surf the socials, and nap * 14:00 – tuned into pregame coverage provided by Purdeu's Sports Network for this afternoon's Purdue / UCLA Semi-Final Round Game of the Big Ten Conference Men's Basketball Tournament * 16:40 – and Purdue wins 73 to 66. * 16:45 – started following a NASCAR X-Finity Series Race, 200 laps on a track in Las Vegas, still very early in Stage 1
Chess: * 14:40 – moved in all pending CC games, joined a GameKnot mini-tournament.
from Golden Splendors
Mystery Wrestling 22 results from Aylmer, Quebec, Canada at Aylmer Thunder Dome on Saturday, March 14, 2026 live on YouTube and Twitch:
Evil Uno and Nug Nahrgang were the broadcast team.
Storm Ryder won a 4-Way Match over Cool Ref, Joe Jobber, and Prisoner Vikton by pinning Jobber after a clothesline in 12:10. Vikton ran out the door and down a street outside the venue late in the match so he couldn’t be taken back to jail by security. Stu Grayson came out after the match and caused a distraction so James Stone could attack him with a chair from behind. London Lightning (Ryder’s brother) made the late save. It will be MW Champion Grayson vs. Lightning in the main event.
Mystery Wrestling 23 will be live on Thursday, March 26, 2026 at 8pm ET.
Cecil Nyx pinned Kingsley after a kick in 14:43 but the actual wrestling didn’t start until about 13:49. Kingsley came out singing to her own theme music and sounded great. She also sung along to Nyx’s theme music when he came out. Nyx is always unlucky on these shows getting stuck in weird gimmick stipulation matches. He was begging here to be in just a regular match for once. The ring announcer told him that he got his wish. Nyx looked like a weight was lifted off of his shoulders. Kingsley then got on the mic and said she had a surprise. She said there would be a singing contest. Nyx told her that he expected she would pull something like this so he had everyone direct their attention to a keyboard player he brought with him in the corner of the venue. Nyx sang “Suddenly, Seymour” from the “Little Shop Of Horrors” movie and someone came from out of the crowd to do a duet with him. It was really great! Then he had a couple of other people come out from the crowd to sing other songs. It was Kingsley’s turn to sing again and she brought out three guys from the locker room to act as her backup dancers. She sang “Nutbush City Limits” made famous by Tina Turner and Ike Turner. She and her backup dancers did the Nutbush Dance while she sang. This was also really great! It went back to Nyx and his friends and they sang “Time Wrap” from The Rocky Horror Picture Show. As they were performing, Kingsley cradled Nyx from behind to try to get the pin but Nyx was able to slip away. Kingsley tried to apologize with a song but it didn’t work. Nyx gave her the kick to get the pin. If the Nutbush Dance seemed familiar, Kyle Fletcher, Toni Storm, and several other wrestlers did it in the ring to close one of those shows off camera when AEW was in Australia last month and there was fan footage of it.
Dreya Mitchell pinned Layla Wilde with a Fisherman’s Driver in 8:20.
Top Dog pinned Haddy in a Food Fight after a Bossman Slam into a pile of uncooked pasta in the ring in 6:59.
Intermission to clean up the ring.
Junior Benito, Macrae Martin, and Jason Exile defeated Jesse V, Mark Wheeler and Jimmy Townsend when Exile pinned Townsend after a big assist from his tag team partners in 9:20.
Psycho Mike pinned The Blade after two low blows in 10:15. Mike conned The Blade and got him all excited thinking that they were going to reunite as a tag team. As The Blade turned his back to celebrate facing the crowd, Mike gave him the first low blow and then put him down with a second low blow.
London Lightning pinned Mystery Wrestling All The Marbles Champion Stu Grayson (with James Stone) with a backslide to win the title in 22:57. Stone pulled the referee out when Grayson was about to get pinned earlier and then he knocked out other referees when they tried to take over. Cool Ref then ran in to finally have some authority. Grayson brought in a table or door and set it up in a corner of the ring. He was going to put Lightning through it but Cecil Nyx ran in and sacrificed himself by putting himself through it to break it. Lightning was able to slip off of Grayson into the backslide. Lightning’s nose and mouth was a bloody mess near the end of the match.

from Douglas Vandergraph
There are moments in life when the world slows down just enough for us to notice something sacred that had been speaking the whole time. Most days rush past us with noise, responsibilities, obligations, and the endless pressure of things that demand our attention, yet every once in a while, the rhythm of life pauses long enough for a quieter voice to rise above the chaos. One of those moments often arrives when the rain begins to fall outside a window. It may begin softly, almost unnoticed at first, like a gentle tapping on the glass, and before long the sky opens fully and the earth begins to drink. People usually describe rain as weather, something inconvenient that changes their plans, but if we slow down and truly listen, rain begins to feel like something else entirely. It carries a presence that feels older than we are, older than the houses we live in and the cities we build. When a person allows themselves to sit quietly and listen to it, rain begins to sound like a whisper that travels down from heaven to remind the soul of something it has forgotten. In those moments, it becomes clear that rain is not simply water falling from the sky but a living metaphor for the steady love of God that never stops pouring into the world.
Many people pass through their days carrying burdens that they rarely speak about out loud. Some are carrying the weight of regret from things they wish they had done differently. Others are carrying wounds left by people who should have loved them better. Some walk through life with quiet fears about the future, wondering whether they will have the strength to face whatever lies ahead. The human heart can become crowded with these things, and over time they build a kind of internal storm that feels heavy and exhausting. Yet the strange beauty of rain is that it invites us to stop fighting the storm for a moment and simply listen. When rain falls steadily outside a window, something in the human spirit begins to settle. The rhythm of the drops hitting the roof, the pavement, and the leaves outside becomes almost like a lullaby for the soul. It reminds us that the world continues to move in cycles far larger than our problems, and that the same God who sends rain to nourish the earth is still present in the quiet spaces of our lives. Rain has a way of telling the weary heart that it does not have to carry everything alone.
If a person sits quietly long enough during a storm, they may begin to notice something deeper happening within them. The sound of the rain creates a space where thoughts begin to slow down, and in that stillness people often become aware of the presence of God in ways they had not noticed before. Scripture tells us to be still and know that He is God, yet stillness is something modern life rarely allows. Our days are filled with voices, screens, conversations, and endless distractions that compete for our attention. Rain interrupts that noise in a way that feels almost holy. When the sky darkens and the rain begins to fall, the world seems to soften its pace. The streets quiet down, the air becomes cooler, and people instinctively move closer to windows, porches, and quiet rooms. It is in those moments that many discover that God often speaks most clearly not through thunderous declarations but through quiet invitations to listen.
There is something profoundly symbolic about the way rain falls drop by drop. No single drop seems powerful on its own, yet together they can transform an entire landscape. Over time rain fills rivers, nourishes forests, and allows fields to grow crops that sustain entire communities. In the same way, God’s grace often arrives in the small moments that seem insignificant when we first encounter them. A kind word from a stranger, a moment of unexpected peace during a difficult day, or a quiet realization that we are not as alone as we once believed can all become drops of grace that slowly restore the human spirit. Many people wait for dramatic miracles to convince them that God is present in their lives, yet the deeper truth is that God often works through a steady rain of small mercies that fall day after day. Each drop may seem small, but together they have the power to soften the hardest soil within the human heart.
One of the most beautiful things about rain is that it falls on everyone. It does not choose the fields that deserve water and avoid the ones that do not. Rain falls on farms, forests, cities, deserts, and quiet neighborhoods alike. In that way it reflects the nature of God’s love, which is not limited by human ideas of worthiness or perfection. Many people believe that they must somehow earn God’s attention before they can experience His love. They carry a quiet fear that their mistakes have placed them outside the reach of grace. Yet the rain outside the window tells a different story. It falls freely, generously, and without hesitation. In the same way, God’s love continues to pour into the world whether people feel deserving of it or not. The sky does not ask permission before it opens, and God does not wait for human perfection before offering grace.
There are evenings when rain arrives with a deeper emotional weight than usual. Perhaps the room is dimly lit, and the soft glow of a lamp reflects against the window while the storm moves through the sky. The world outside becomes blurred by streams of water sliding down the glass, and for a moment the outside world feels distant. Those are the moments when people often begin reflecting on their lives. Old memories return, some joyful and others painful. Regrets may surface, along with quiet questions about the path that led them to this particular moment. In those reflective spaces, the sound of rain can feel like God sitting beside us in silence, offering a presence that does not judge or condemn. Instead of demanding explanations, the rain simply continues falling, reminding us that grace continues whether we feel worthy of it or not.
The Bible is filled with imagery that connects water with renewal, cleansing, and life. In ancient times people depended on rain for survival in ways that modern societies often forget. A season without rain could mean famine, hardship, and suffering. When rain finally arrived, it was celebrated as a blessing that restored hope to entire communities. The prophets often spoke of God sending rain as a sign of His faithfulness and provision. In that sense, rain has always been more than a natural event; it has been a visible reminder that life itself depends on a source beyond human control. When rain falls today, it still carries that same quiet message. It reminds us that we live within a world sustained by a Creator who continues to provide what we need, even when we are too distracted to notice.
There is also a profound emotional honesty that rain seems to invite from the human heart. Many people find it easier to face their feelings when the sky is gray and the sound of rain fills the air. Perhaps it is because rain mirrors the emotional storms people experience inside themselves. Just as clouds gather before releasing their water, human hearts often gather unspoken emotions before releasing them in tears, prayer, or quiet reflection. When rain falls outside, it feels as though creation itself is acknowledging the reality of sorrow, healing, and renewal. The rain becomes a companion to the soul, reminding us that even storms have a purpose and that the release of what we carry can become the beginning of something new.
As the rain continues falling, the earth slowly begins to change. Dust settles, the air becomes cleaner, and the smell of wet soil rises gently from the ground. Leaves appear brighter, and the landscape takes on a renewed freshness that was not there before the storm began. That transformation mirrors the way God often works within the human spirit. Life’s storms may feel uncomfortable while they are happening, yet they often prepare the ground of our hearts for growth that could not have happened otherwise. Rain teaches us that storms are not always signs of destruction. Sometimes they are signs that something necessary is taking place beneath the surface, something that will allow new life to emerge when the clouds finally pass.
There is a quiet truth hidden in the rhythm of falling rain that many people overlook because life has trained them to move too quickly. Rain does not rush. It does not force the earth to change all at once. Instead it falls steadily, patiently, and persistently until the ground slowly begins to soften and receive it. This gentle persistence reveals something profound about the way God often works within the human soul. Many people want transformation to arrive instantly, hoping that a single moment of prayer or realization will immediately erase years of pain, doubt, and confusion. Yet the deeper pattern of spiritual restoration resembles rain more than lightning. God often chooses the slower path of healing, allowing grace to fall steadily into our lives until the hardest places within us gradually begin to soften. What once seemed impossible to change begins to shift, not through force but through the quiet patience of divine love that refuses to stop pouring itself into the world.
When a storm passes over a city at night, the sound of rain against rooftops and windows becomes a kind of universal language that every person understands. Somewhere in a small apartment a person may be sitting alone, staring out at the storm while reflecting on a difficult chapter of life. In another home a family may be gathered together listening to the same rain while sharing laughter and conversation. In yet another place someone may be praying quietly beside their bed, asking God for strength to face something they feel unprepared for. The same rain falls on each of these places without discrimination, and in that simple act it reveals a truth about God’s presence in the world. His love is not reserved for one kind of life or one kind of person. It flows toward every human story, touching moments of joy and moments of struggle alike. Rain reminds us that God’s compassion extends into every room, every street, and every quiet corner of human experience.
The longer a person listens to rain, the more it begins to feel like a conversation that does not rely on words. There is something profoundly calming about the steady pattern of drops striking the ground. It is not chaotic noise but a kind of natural music that carries a rhythm older than humanity itself. That rhythm can gently guide the mind into a place of reflection where deeper truths begin to surface. People who feel overwhelmed by the demands of life often discover that simply sitting quietly with the rain can help them breathe again. The storm becomes a teacher of stillness, reminding us that not every moment of life needs to be filled with effort and striving. Sometimes the most faithful response a person can offer to God is simply to be present, to sit in the quiet, and to allow the soul to listen.
There is also something deeply reassuring about the way rain eventually passes. Even the heaviest storm cannot continue forever. The clouds move on, the sky begins to brighten, and sunlight slowly returns to the world. This simple pattern reflects a truth that many people desperately need to hear during difficult seasons of life. Hard moments feel permanent while they are happening, yet history repeatedly shows that storms eventually give way to clearer skies. Rain teaches patience in the middle of hardship. It reminds us that the presence of clouds does not mean the sun has disappeared forever. In the same way, moments of uncertainty or pain do not mean that God has stepped away from our lives. Often the very storms we fear are part of the process through which God prepares our hearts for a new season of growth and understanding.
After the rain ends, the world looks different. Puddles reflect the sky, leaves glisten with droplets, and the air carries a freshness that was not there before the storm arrived. The earth seems to breathe again, as though the rain has washed away the dust of yesterday and made space for something new. This transformation offers a powerful image of the way God restores the human spirit. When grace falls steadily into our lives, it begins to cleanse the accumulated dust of regret, disappointment, and fear that settles over the heart. Slowly the soul begins to see the world differently. Hope returns in small but meaningful ways. Gratitude begins to replace bitterness. The future no longer feels like something to fear but something to walk toward with renewed trust.
Many people spend years searching for dramatic signs that prove God is present in their lives. They imagine that divine communication must arrive through spectacular events that leave no room for doubt. Yet the deeper truth is that God often speaks through moments that appear ordinary on the surface. Rain falling outside a window may not seem like a miracle at first glance, but when a person listens closely it begins to reveal a quiet message that carries immense spiritual weight. Each drop becomes a reminder that God’s care continues whether we notice it or not. The steady rhythm of falling water echoes the steady rhythm of grace that flows into the world every day. It is not dramatic, yet it is powerful enough to reshape entire lives.
There is a reason that people throughout history have found comfort in watching rain fall. Poets, writers, and spiritual teachers across centuries have recognized that rain invites reflection in a way few other natural experiences can. It softens the noise of the outside world and creates a sanctuary of sound where deeper thoughts can emerge. When someone sits by a window during a storm, they are participating in a moment that countless human beings have shared throughout history. Generations before us have watched rain fall and wondered about the mysteries of life, the presence of God, and the meaning of the journey each person walks. In those moments the boundaries of time feel thinner, as though the same rain that nourishes the earth today has been part of a story unfolding since the beginning of creation.
The spiritual beauty of rain also lies in its humility. Rain does not demand recognition. It does not announce its arrival with pride or expectation. It simply falls and accomplishes its purpose quietly. In that way it reflects the character of Christ, whose life revealed that true greatness is often expressed through humility and service. Jesus spoke about the rain falling on both the just and the unjust, illustrating that God’s generosity extends far beyond human calculations of fairness. Rain becomes a living symbol of grace that does not keep score or hold grudges. It pours itself out freely because love, by its very nature, cannot help but give.
As the evening storm slowly fades and the final drops fall from the edge of the roof, there is often a deep sense of calm that settles over the world. The air feels cooler, the night becomes quieter, and the sound of water dripping from leaves creates a peaceful rhythm that lingers long after the rain has passed. In those moments it becomes easier to understand the invitation contained within the words, “Be still, and know that He is God.” Stillness allows the heart to recognize that the same Creator who sends rain to nourish the earth is also tending to the hidden landscapes of our lives. God’s work often unfolds quietly beneath the surface, preparing growth that will only become visible in time.
When we begin to see rain this way, it stops feeling like an inconvenience and starts becoming a sacred reminder. Every storm becomes an opportunity to pause, breathe, and remember that grace continues to fall even when life feels uncertain. The clouds may gather and the sky may darken, but the rain they carry is not a punishment. It is nourishment for a world that constantly needs renewal. In the same way, God continues to pour His love into our lives whether we are aware of it or not. That love falls gently and persistently, touching wounded places within us and restoring strength where we thought nothing could grow again.
So the next time rain begins tapping softly against your window, resist the urge to rush past the moment. Sit down for a while and listen. Let the sound slow your thoughts and open a quiet space inside your heart. Imagine each drop as a reminder that God’s love is still falling into the world, steady and faithful, drop by drop. The storm outside may feel temporary, but the grace it represents is endless. Long after the clouds have passed, the truth carried by the rain will remain. God is still speaking, still healing, and still pouring out His love upon the earth.
Your friend, Douglas Vandergraph
Watch Douglas Vandergraph’s inspiring faith-based videos on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/@douglasvandergraph
Support the ministry by buying Douglas a coffee https://www.buymeacoffee.com/douglasvandergraph
Financial support to help keep this Ministry active daily can be mailed to:
Vandergraph Po Box 271154 Fort Collins, Colorado 80527
from folgepaula
Just to save your precious time
when someone tries to judge me most of the time I think: in a way I agree, but in a way I disagree cause there’s not that much of me one actually knows, neither the good nor the bad.
As a small public service announcement, I’ll take this chance to clarify: you could invite my biggest hater, my archenemy, the ex from my worst affair, I’d challenge them all. fist fight, round one: someone yet has to be born who can be as harsh with me as I already am to myself.
Good luck trying to make me feel guilty. you can call my mom, even consult my therapist it still won’t work. in ten minutes they’ll convince you the same way I convinced them and I’ve convinced myself: it took me 35 springs, a childhood pneumonia, thousands of full moons, the traumatic death of my turtles, the loss of four fishes, and my childhood dog, a pool drowning during vacations in 94, my parents' divorce, that time I was alone with my nana and she ended up in hospital, the winters in Austria, the MA35, a flight in which I nearly died alone in Nepal, the heartbreaking extinction of orangutans, the patriarchy, the down of the Down Jones, the high expectations from my grandparents, the Snow White birthday theme when all I wanted was The Beauty and the Beast, Helena from kindergarten bitting my arm every day, Germany 7x1 Brazil during the Worldcup 2014, and I wouldn't underestimate the effects from the last eclipse to make me precisely this way.
And whatever didn’t fit that story I simply don’t remember. because my memory is terrible, like for every hematoma on my knee there goes another oopsie, no idea where that came from.
So honestly, my mortal friends if you’re stressing to understand me, save yourself some precious time. There’s just as much in me to blame as there is to adore. Why not just surrender instead to the funniest ride?
/mar26