Plans for this Saturday include following three radio games: 1.) Up first will be a men's college basketball game with a scheduled start of 11:00 AM Central Time featuring the Butler Bulldogs at the DePaul Blue Demons. 2.) Next will be an MLB Spring Training game with a scheduled start of 2:00 PM Central Time between my Texas Rangers and the San Francisco Giants. 3.) The third and final radio game planned for today will be another men's college basketball contest featuring my Indiana Hoosiers at the Ohio St. Buckeyes, with a scheduled start time of 4:30 PM Central Time.

And the adventure continues.

#002300 – 15 de Setembro de 2025

Propõe Cal Newport, num contexto de bioética: imaginemos que alguém se põe a refletir nos perigos que a biotecnologia pode trazer ao mundo. E que essa pessoa se pergunta, e se fosse possível clonar ovos de dinossauro? Partindo desse pressuposto, essa pessoa a seguir desenvolve, durante vinte anos, um trabalho de reflexão sobre os perigos de um mundo com dinossauros à solta. Teoriza em detalhe sobre a dificuldade que seria controlar dinossauros, qual o tamanho e as características de vedações que realmente conseguissem conter tiranossauros, sobre que tipo de dardos tranquilizantes seriam suficientemente eficazes para fazer adormecer animais de porte tão imenso.

Ora bem, isto, diz Newport, é o que se está a fazer com a Inteligência Artificial. Os doomers, como Eliezer Yudkowsky, que avisam sobre o perigo de uma superinteligência emergindo a partir do software actual, partem do pressuposto que é possível, a partir dos actuais modelos de linguagem e agentes de inteligência artificial, gerar uma superinteligência autónoma, com objectivos e intenções. E a seguir passam o tempo a imaginar quão difícil seria conter uma superinteligência à solta, esquecendo-se de que tudo o que dizem parte de um pressuposto. Primeiro há que pressupor que é possível criar uma superinteligência. Tudo o resto é imaginação. E a ciência informática actual não tem ideia de como gerar uma superinteligência.

A isto chama Cal Newport a falácia do filósofo (the philosopher's fallacy). No seu canal sobre ontologia, Casey Hart refere-se a esta falácia como “Blueprint Bias”, algo que poderíamos traduzir muito desajeitadamente como viés de design inicial. Basicamente, esta falácia consiste em tratar um pressuposto como um facto, ou em esquecer que tudo o que se diz assenta num pressuposto. Quer no caso hipotético do aviso sobre o perigo de dinossauros à solta, quer no caso de uma super inteligência artificial à solta, tudo se passa dentro da experiência de pensamento. Este tipo de experiências são muito caras aos escritores de ficção científica. As premissa “e se...?” são a base de muitas histórias. Já a ciência e as decisões políticas precisam de assentar na realidade. Todo este alarido doomer, com cenários de apocalipse à Matrix distrai-nos das verdadeiras questões éticas do nosso tempo, no que toca à inteligência artificial: o seu uso em armas autónomas e em vigilância massiva, o roubo descarado de dados pessoais e trabalho de artistas, o potencial de concentração ainda maior de poder e corrupção das democracias, a facilidade com que agora se produz fake news. Nada disto necessita de superinteligências, nada disto é inevitável.

Adventurers

Character	Race	Class	Description
Sieghart Totschinder	Human	Fighter level 1	Soldier of fortune hailing from the City-State of the Invincible Overlord. Impoverished into desperation.
Syd Grundy	Human	Ranger level 1	Tall, middle aged and scruffy looking man of the wilderness.
Thorinda Bung	Human	Monk level 1	She has blonde hair done up in a tight pony tail and wears light, loose suit.
Ambros	Human	Cleric level 6	Follower of Aniu, Lord of Time.
Ignaeus	Elf	Fighter level 4 / magic-user level 5	A slightly weathered looking elf with dull blonde hair and chiseled features. Seeks wealth and knowledge.
Kenso San	Human	Fighter level 3	An arrogant and self-assured sellsword wandering Wilderlands to prove he can best anyone.
Tam o' Shanter	Human	Cleric level 3	A boisterous wine-lover of Losborst on a Great Crusade of the Grape.

Blackmoon 3rd, Earthday

Ignaeus and Ambros assembled a party of seven, intent on plundering the depths of Castle Yukanthur. After their last visit was naught but a scouting mission. This time they would return with some wealth. So they said, and so it shall be done.

The party reached ruined remains of Yukanthur's last resort by early noon. They spent half an hour scouting the surroundings and ruined gatehouse for any signs of change. Then they descended down the spiral staircase in the south-west tower.

A chipped and weathered stone statue faced them at the bottom of stairs, unmoved. Upon approach large mouth formed above the statue, booming:

“WHO DARE ENTER THE CASTLE OF YUKANTHUR?!”

Like before, adventurers ignored the warning and turned left. They passed the illusory wall, headed straight, then left, and then straight until they were at the spot where few of the adventurers had fought a tentacled monstrosity a month or so ago.

They forced open doors leading east, entering a thirty by thirty chamber with many doors. There were in total four doors, two on the west wall, one on the east wall, and one on the south wall. Syd immediately picked up on the clues suggesting that there is a lot of passage through this chamber.

Keen elven senses tipped off Ignaeus that something is amiss. After thorough search he had found secret doors in the south-east corner. By all accounts it was a sliding panel activated by pressing on the flagstone.

Adventurers lined up, weapons at ready. Ignaeus stepped on the stone. Doors slid open. Before them a room opened up, some twenty by thirty feet. Unpleasant smell of dozens of tallow candles hit their nostrils. Two large workbenches were lined up against the east wall. A robed figure was hunched over one of the tables. A large man dressed in chainshirt faced the adventurers.

Sieghart charged in first, attacking the armed man. The duo locked in wicked duel, exchanging blows. Sieghart successfully parried all of them. The man was promptly slain by Kenso and Ignaeus.

Tam ran at the robed man, just in time to get blasted in the face by projectile discharged from the wand wielded by the man. Sieghart seized the robbed man like he was a mere child. He broke his back with a mighty squeeze. Thorinda finished the man by glaiving him.

Flesh of dead mage exploded with gore as the skeleton set itself free. Rubble and garbage around one the floor assembled into six more skeletons. Mage's skeleton still wielded the wand. It blasted Tam once more.

Ambros, whom had remained by the secret doors, held up golden gavel and uttered holy words. One of the skeletons turned to dust. Others attacked the adventurers, Thorinda was violently penetrated, and she succumbed. Cleric of Aniu called on Forseti once more, banishing all the skeletons.

Victorious, the party turned to plundering the chamber. Besides two workbenches, there were also some stools, a chair, several shelves, and miscellaneous laboratory equipment like beakers, alembics, empty vials, and similar.

Sieghart stripped the dead warrior of his chainshirt. He also took the sword, which was most definitely magical. He passed it on, preferring his own morningstar. In total, adventurers took 250 gold pieces, twelve small bottles filled with brown red liquid, and man's spell book. They also packed twelve books for later retrieval.

The chamber had but a single doors, those leading north. Opening the secret doors revealed that the chamber they came through was now filled with giant rats. So adventurers closed the secret doors and opted to focus on the regular doors to the north. All efforts to force it open result with miserable—and shameful—failure. In order to save face, they hacked the doors down with a battle axe.

Corridor led them to another doors, connecting to chamber of many doors, as well as to a split, the latter leading to another doors, and another long corridor. This doors were easy to open, revealing naught but empty chamber. This perplexed the adventurers so much they spent significant time investigating the chamber. They found nothing.

Emboldened, they returned to many-doored chamber. This time they went south, emerging into a large chamber with six skeletons. Ambros turned them to dust.

Onwards, south, through another door, and then through winding corridor, led to yet another stuck doors. Sounds of barking and combat could be hear. Adventurers broke through.

Four kobolds were bunched on a wood table in the centre of the room. They were fighting off a dozen giant rats attempting to climb.

Adventurers killed them all.

Searching the room did not yield any interesting treasure. Besides doors to the east they came through, there were two more doors, one to the south, and one to the west. Adventurers went through the last ones.

Thirty feet long corridor connected to another doors straight ahead before turning further right. Carefully moving forward, party could see another doors to their right. They were wide open.

Shining bullseye lantern in that direction revealed a square chamber bereft of anything but one thing—butt-naked male corpse in the center of the room. Coming closer confirmed the man was indeed naked. His crack faced the party, while his finger pointed to north-east corner.

Coming yet closer resulted with a surprise attack of transparent goo that coated the man. Striking it result with a dissolved weapon. Ambros and Ignaeus poured military oil on the creature and then set it on fire.

Everyone fled the room. Sieghart closed the doors shut. Burning ooze seeped through the cracks. It seized his feet and crawled up, engulfing him up to his belly button. Sieghart feinted from the terrible shock and pain he endured.

Syd and Ignaeus ran toward Sieghart, grabbing his arms. They tried to pull him out of the burning ooze coating his lower body. Alas, they only managed to drag him with the ooze still attached.

At this moment doors they passed swung open. A gang of pig-faced beastmen spilled out, grunting and wielding wicked scimitars.

Adventurers were now squeezed between a burning acid ooze on one side, and a gang of violent orcs on another.

Sieghart's lower was coated with flesh dissolving ooze, which in turn was mixed with military oil, which was on fire. Thorinda was hunched over, barely containing her guts after being pierced open by skeletons. Tam was still mangled up after repeatedly taking Magic Missile to the face.

Will Castle Yukanthur claim more than one man's manhood?

Memes by Jan.

Discuss at Dragonsfoot forum.

#Wilderlands #SessionReport

Went to see the Baz Luhrman-directed Elvis doc last night. It starts with a recap of Elvis’ career up to that point, notably omitting the ‘68 Comeback Special, presumably because that’s better than any of the Vegas footage that follows. Then we see some rehearsals, and then we get to the live shows.

The movie is GORGEOUS. Just an absolute super-saturated feast for the eyes. Luhrmann and Elvis seem to share views about subtlety, which is to say I’m not sure either was/is familiar with the concept, so subject and filmmaker are a great match. And it’s a bold move on Luhrmann’s part to try to redeem the most widely ridiculed and derided stage of Elvis’s career. And, for the most part, he succeeds.

We see the band being loose and having fun in rehearsals, and the joy Elvis got from performing is infectious to the band, the live audience, and the movie audience. And God knows we all need a little joy these days.

So far so good, though I have one quibble with the performer and one with the filmmaker.

Elvis loved performing and would often make jokes, often at the expense of the material, to entertain the audience, as when, in EPIC, he changes the “Are You Lonesome Tonight” lyrics to “do you gaze at your forehead and wish you had hair.” This makes him a fun performer to watch, but it means that he, and therefore the audience, are kept at an ironic distance from the songs. Which is a shame because he was a gifted singer who could wring something real even out of bad material. The performance of “Suspicious Minds” in this movie shows what he can do when he’s actually trying, and it’s spectacular.

Still, if you go into this movie as a non fan trying to understand why Elvis mattered, this movie probably won’t help you understand. I encourage you to seek out the sit down shows from the comeback special—they didn’t give Elvis a guitar strap, so he had to channel all his energy into the songs. It’s stunning.

As for Luhrmann, he’s kind of mistitled this movie. I don’t think theres A single song that we get to see performed start to finish without interview voiceovers or cuts to rehearsal footage or other footage of Elvis working the crowd or fleeing the crowd or driving around Vegas, etc. So it’s not really Elvis Presley in Concert, because at a concert you get to hear the whole song.

Still, it’s been a rough week, and this movie made me happy for an hour and a half, which, in the year 2026, is about the highest recommendation I can give.

夜の海辺だった。波の音だけが続いている。 俺は砂の上に座り、ずっと同じことを考えていた。

「子供の頃、漫画が好きで夢中になっていたのに、今はまるで感動しないな」

隣に座っている鳴海さんは、波を見たまま言った。

「予測できてしまう脳になるからだよ。大人はストーリーの型を知りすぎているからね」

鳴海さんは、生物物理学研究室の俺の先輩だ。 今は研究室で助手をやっている。

俺は反論する。

「予想できないことは世の中にたくさんありますよ。でも、予想できなくても関心がないことの方が多い。予想できないことが楽しいわけじゃないです」

鳴海さんは少し黙ってから言った。

「じゃあ、ドーパミンの反応が弱くなるからだ。新しい体験が減るからだね」

「新しい体験も世の中にたくさんあります。でも、やったことのない経験でも、興味がないことの方が多いですよ。新しい体験が必ず感動に繋がるわけではないです」

「じゃあ、世界を旅する主人公に感情移入するのが難しくなるから？」

「今でも世界を冒険できるならしたいですよ。でも漫画は読みたいと思わない。感情移入できるかどうかとは関係ないです」

「想像力の使い方が変わるから？」

「自分の想像力が衰えているとは思えません。でも面白いとは思わない」

「うーん」

それから先輩は言った。

「子供の頃は漫画が『自分の問題』だった。でも大人になると『他人の問題』になる、というのは？」

「どういうことですか」

「人間の興味は『新しさ』と『自分との関係』で決まる。子供の頃、漫画は自分の人生と強く結びついていた。強くなりたい、認められたい、友達が欲しい。それがリアルな欲望だった。でも大人になると欲望が変わる。安定、金、地位、家族、時間。少年漫画のテーマは、もう自分の問題じゃなくなる」

俺は少し考える。

「それは一理あります。でも、子供の頃の自分と漫画は直接関係がないのに、なぜ子供の頃は関心があるんですか？」

「子供はまだ社会経験が少ない。友達関係、勝ち負け、仲間、ルール、勇気。そういうものを理解している途中なんだ。漫画はそれを、極端にわかりやすい形で圧縮して見せる。現実の友達関係は複雑で曖昧だけど、漫画の友情は明確だ。現実の努力は報われないことが多いけど、漫画の努力は成長として可視化される」

「つまり、漫画は現実のモデル？」

「そう。子供の脳は単純化された世界モデルを好む。そしてもう一つ大きいのは、『安全な社会シミュレーション』としての機能だ」

「シミュレーション？」

「人間の子供は狩りができない。戦えない。社会を運営できない。でも将来はそれをやる必要がある。そこで進化したのが、安全に社会を学ぶ方法だ。ごっこ遊びや、物語だ。危険な現実を体験する前に、頭の中で練習するんだ」

波を見る。

しばらく沈黙が続いた。 波の音だけが聞こえる。

俺は言った。

「子供が漫画と自分を重ねるのは、本当に子供に『可能性』があるからじゃないですか？ だったら、わざわざ脳がそういう仕組みを持つ必要はないんじゃないですかね」

先輩はゆっくりと答えた。

「それは順序が逆だね」

「逆？」

「『可能性があるから重ねる』んじゃない。『重ねる仕組みがあるから可能性を学習できる』んだ」

俺は先輩の横顔を見る。

「人間の子供は極端に未完成で生まれる。鹿は数時間で立ち上がる。猫は数週間で自立する。でも人間は十年以上かかる。社会のルール、人間関係、協力、裏切り、戦略。他者を模倣して学ぶ」

「物語の主人公は、学習しやすい行動モデルなのか」

「そう。明確な目標、強い感情、行動、結果。全部揃っている。子供の脳は主人公を見ると自動的に『自分ならどうするか』を計算する。それはかなり自動的で、能動的だ」

俺は言った。

「じゃあ、物語は『未来の自分の候補』を見せている」

「そうだ。脳は主人公A、主人公B、主人公Cを見ながら、無意識に『勇敢な自分』『優しい自分』『狡猾な自分』を試している。人格パターンのシミュレーションだ」

「大人になるとそれが弱まるのは？」

「能力、性格、社会的位置が固定されるからだ。可能性空間が狭まる。主人公を見ても『これは自分ではない』と判断する。同一化回路が弱まる」

俺は、そもそも先輩に何を聞きたかったんだっけと思う。

「魔法が使えたり空を飛べたりするキャラに子供が憧れるのはなぜでしょうか。それは明確に、未来の自分ではないのでは？」

先輩は笑う。 俺からすると、どうでもいいところで。

「子供は『制約』を強く感じている。体が小さい、力が弱い、行動範囲が狭い、大人に決定権がある。常に『できないこと』を経験している。空を飛ぶ、魔法を使う、巨大な力を持つ。そういう能力は、制約を一気に突破する象徴なんだ」

「飛行は移動の制約、魔法は因果の制約、超力は身体の制約ってことですね」

「そう。魔法は自由の象徴だ。人間の脳は『能力の拡張』を自然に想像する。速く走る→もっと速く→空を飛ぶ、というように。そして子供は『不可能』をまだ完全には理解していない。現実と空想の境界が柔らかい」

俺は言う。

「でも、その『能力拡張』って、実際に人間の機能にあるんじゃないですか？ 人間は環境に応じて少しずつ体の形を変えてきている。それは、人間が強く念じたからでは？」

先輩は少し間を置いた。

「結論から言うと、『意思そのものが遺伝子を直接変えて進化を起こした』という証拠は今のところない。進化の仕組みは、遺伝子にランダムな変化が起きて、環境に合う個体が生き残り、その遺伝子が広がる、というのが基本的な理解だ」

「じゃあ、意思は関係ないんですか？」

「いや、間接的にはある。意思は環境を変えることができる。人間は農業を始め、牧畜をし、都市を作った。それが環境を変え、進化の方向に影響を与えた。たとえば乳糖耐性。昔の人間は大人になると牛乳を消化できなかった。でも牧畜文化が生まれて、牛乳を飲める人と飲めない人で生存率が変わり、牛乳を消化できる遺伝子が広がった」

意思、行動、環境、進化。

「そう。文化が進化を作る」

夜の海はどこまでも暗く、でも月明かりが細く波を照らしていた。

「それでも」と俺は言う。

先輩はこちらを見ずに波を見ている。

「それでも、俺はまだ、意思による進化を諦めたくないです」

波の音が聞こえる。 先輩はしばらく黙って、それから言った。

「私も、君に諦めてほしくないかもしれないね」

風が少し強くなった。 俺は砂の上に立ったまま、ずっと海を見ていた。

波の音だけが続いている。 子供の頃、漫画の中で見た広い海みたいな夜だった。

Gratitude List:

1. Woke up clean.
2. My family is safe.
3. Gods plan!

Prayer list:

1. Protect me and mine from the evil of this earth.
2. Watch over our children & their futures
3. Bless my opps.

How’s everyone doing? I’m doing pretty good. Feeling immense feelings of gratitude. I have come to conclusion that I WANT to let go. I WANT to let God. His timing is so perfect, I believe I’ve mentioned this before.

I cannot believe how much grace He has for me. I’m am so glad.

Short & sweet today, the verse is as follows:

3 But the Lord is faithful, and he will strengthen you and protect you from the evil one. (‭‭‭2 Thessalonians‬ ‭3‬‬:‭3‬ ‭NIV11‬‬)

Love ya!

Jaide owwt*

Leyó que tirarse de los lóbulos de las orejas y golpearse la punta de la nariz con la palma de la mano izquierda fomenta la creatividad. Reflexionó unos segundos sobre el particular y le pareció una payasada.

Continuó leyendo y a renglón seguido se enteró de que era una técnica ancestral que un sabio de la India llevó a China. Se tocó la barbilla y le pareció prudente experimentar, por si se trataba de la práctica de algún yoga o gesto ritual y, por tanto, con un sentido más profundo de lo que parecía a simple vista.

Continuó leyendo y supo que otros estudiosos consideraban que esta práctica era todavía más antigua, mencionada en un papiro ptolemaico que añade el apoyarse con un solo pie mientras se realiza, preferentemente el derecho, si se tiene. Pensando en esto, se dijo: “Aquí da en el blanco. El pie derecho es el contrario de la mano izquierda en el plano inferior y por tanto establece el equilibrio. Esta enseñanza es profunda”.

Por la noche, antes de cenar, su hija de ocho años lo vio hacer la práctica. De inmediato se puso a imitarlo aunque después del golpe a la nariz la niña sacó la lengua y comenzó a cantar con tal dulzura que parecía un ángel.

Luego de que ella saliera corriendo a sus cosas, él siguió ejercitándose en la práctica, incorporando a la misma la sacada de lengua que estimó reglamentaria. Pero no cantó como la niña, y aunque hizo las muecas de Torrebruno, su voz sonaba como la de Cher.

-Esto no debe ser bueno -se dijo. Y guardó el libro bajo llave.

Every passing day gets easier, as I recognize more and more that I had a lot of good memories with her, but at the same time she is not the person that I would want to spend my life with. I think I have both learned that I need to be a lot more picky in love, and also how if I am not happy being a single or happy with my life, I’m so much more susceptible to a bad relationship. To be completely honest, this last relationship happened a big part because I had just moved and I was struggling to make friends and I was struggling with that loneliness. But I absolutely have that dog in me. I can make friends, I can be an extrovert at Will, I can organize events, I can garner people around me to do things, because I’ve put in that effort before and I get to reap the rewards from that. Keep in mind that things are not difficult, they are just unfamiliar.

It’s weird, it’s been 10 days since we’ve broken up but I feel a sense of peace. I don’t hate her at all, and there’s still of course a couple of things that still hurt that I need to just get exposed to, and also to wait for time. Something I’ve had to be conscious enough is not attributing certain attributes about her as bad things, like for example the fact that she played Valorant or would do certain things at the gym, I noticed that sometimes I get the urge to pull away from it, and I tell myself that “Oh in the future I wouldn’t want a partner like that”. But those things aren’t the issue, it’s more things like the lack of accountability, or the feeling of having to drag someone into adulthood. Those are valid things, but the rest aren’t that deep. Either way I’m very excited because tomorrow I’m going to make a complete song with S, and I’m excited to just spend time with him and make something stupid.

Netkerk Ahoi

Bladzijde wat ben je leeg je zegt niet wat mij beweegt blijkbaar heb je niks te zeggen geen goed idee te weerleggen geen ver verleden op te dreggen uit het groot historisch riool klapt iedereen op de juiste maat in de daarvoor opgerichte school ik zie wel in dat niets niet volstaat dat wat in is ook weer uit gaat in elke kop draait toch een plaat zit een alarmerend verkeersbord een hart dat vanzelfsprekend uitstort voor elke zin is er een takenpakket op het altijd drug bezige internet de blanco bladzijde is niet meer er is over niets heen gepubliceerd ik heb me er kranig tegen verweerd en hopelijk heb jij je lesje geleerd want niks melden op de netkerk voor tekens gemaakt is verkeerd

DriveThruRPG is running 40% sale off many titles in celebration of GM's day.

As usual, this is a good time to grab the classics from the TSR catalogue: OD&D, D&D, and AD&D 1e.

Since this is all about Judges, here are some books I find useful for preparing sandbox games:

• The Nomicon
• Tome of Worldbuilding
• Tome Of Adventure Design
• Cities
• Book of Lost Tables
• Goods and Gear: The Ultimate Adventurer's Guide
• HârnManor
• Medieval Manager
• A Magical Medieval Society

All issues of the legendary Fight On! zine are on sale too. Can't go wrong with those as they are chock-full of gameable material, including some contributions by yours truly.

Spend responsibly.

#Sale #OSR

Written by: Epikurus | March 5, 2026 — 01:34 AM

My brain—and by unfortunate extension, the rest of this meat vehicle I pilot—is trained to run threat assessments pretty much 24/7. There’s a setting I slip into that I call Incident Command Mode, and occasionally my mind just… forgets to read the memo that says you can stand down now, champ.

I’ve seen enough worst-case scenarios—personally and professionally—that my senses default to an endless background process:

Okay, quick systems check… and again… and again… and again…

Hypervigilance is a weird little superpower with a cursed side effect. It sharpens your awareness, sure. But it also installs an alarm system that never fully powers down. It just idles there, humming ominously like a refrigerator possessed by anxiety.

Most of the time I keep the running commentary to myself. I know how exhausting it would be if I narrated every contingency out loud.

“Just a heads up, if that ceiling fan detaches at 2,000 RPM I’ll dive left, you roll right—”

Yeah. No one wants that.

So, the calculations stay internal. Quiet. Continuous. Like some deranged little background program my brain refuses to close. Task Manager says it’s using 94% of system resources but apparently, it’s a critical process and shutting it down might cause the whole operating system to blue-screen.

Still, every now and then—rarely, but necessarily—I have to physically reach into my own head and flip the OFF switch.

Not because the world has suddenly become safe. I’m not that naïve.

But because if I don’t, the surveillance drone that is my consciousness will just keep circling forever until it runs out of fuel and crashes directly into my sanity.

Usually this moment happens at home, when I’m trying to ground myself. I don’t pretend home is magically immune to chaos. Bad things can happen anywhere. Lightning strikes. Pipes burst. The universe throws dice.

Grounding isn’t pretending risk doesn’t exist.

It’s acknowledging the present moment without letting the apocalypse department run the meeting.

So, I do a quick internal status check:

I’m okay.

There’s no danger here. Nothing is happening. Right now, in this exact second, things are okay.

When that message finally lands, my body loosens its death grip on reality. Shoulders drop a few inches. My breathing remembers it’s supposed to be slow and not the respiratory equivalent of a tactical sprint. The radar sweep in my head softens.

Not gone.

Just… quieter.

The pause is deliberate. A tiny, negotiated ceasefire between me and my own nervous system.

A brief, fragile détente with the paranoid raccoon operating the threat-analysis center of my brain.

Somewhere in the desert outside Riyadh, construction crews are laying the foundations for what Saudi Arabia hopes will become one of the most powerful AI computing facilities on Earth. Backed by more than $100 billion in planned investment from HUMAIN, a company launched in May 2025 under the Saudi Public Investment Fund, the project envisions 11 data centres with a combined capacity of 2,200 megawatts, powered by several hundred thousand NVIDIA GPUs. Two large campuses are already under construction, with the company targeting 50 megawatts of operational capacity by the end of 2025 and adding another 50 megawatts every quarter into 2026. It is, by any measure, an audacious undertaking. But the truly radical part is not the hardware. It is the politics.

HUMAIN is not just building servers. It is building sovereignty. The company's flagship Arabic large language model, ALLAM 34B, has been independently verified by Cohere on the MMLU benchmark as the most advanced Arabic LLM built in the Arab world. HUMAIN Chat, the consumer-facing application powered by ALLAM 34B, launched in August 2025 as a national milestone before beginning its regional rollout across the Middle East. When HUMAIN CEO Tareq Amin told CNBC that the company's ambition was to become “the third-largest AI provider in the world, behind the United States and China,” he was articulating something more than corporate aspiration. He was describing a geopolitical strategy, one rooted in the Kingdom's Vision 2030 framework and the broader conviction that AI sovereignty is, as analysts at the Saudi Data and AI Authority have put it, “not isolationism, but intelligent independence.”

This is the new reality confronting Amazon, Microsoft, Google, and every other hyperscaler racing to deploy AI infrastructure across the Global South. The old playbook of building data centres, plugging them into the global cloud, and letting the algorithms flow freely is dead. In its place, a far more complicated game is emerging, one in which governments are demanding not just local servers but local intelligence, not just data residency but data sovereignty, not just computing power but the right to understand, audit, and ultimately control what those computers are doing.

Six Hundred Billion Dollars Chasing a Moving Target

The numbers are staggering. According to CreditSights, capital expenditure by the five largest hyperscalers (Amazon, Alphabet, Microsoft, Meta, and Oracle) is projected to reach approximately $602 billion in 2026, a 36 per cent increase over 2025 and a dramatic acceleration from the $256 billion spent in 2024. Roughly three quarters of that spending, around $450 billion, is directed specifically at AI infrastructure. McKinsey projects that global demand for data centre capacity will grow at a compound annual rate of 22 per cent through 2030, reaching 220 gigawatts, nearly six times larger than demand in 2020. Of that total, AI workloads are expected to account for 156 gigawatts by 2030, up from 44 gigawatts in 2025. The costs are almost incomprehensible: McKinsey estimates between $5.2 trillion and $7.9 trillion in cumulative capital expenditure will be needed to build out AI data centre capacity through the end of the decade.

Amazon alone raised its 2025 capital expenditure guidance to $125 billion, a 61 per cent increase year over year. AWS announced more than $30 billion in combined investments in Pennsylvania and North Carolina for what it calls “AI innovation campuses.” By the end of 2025, the company had added 3.8 gigawatts of capacity over the previous twelve months, more than any other hyperscaler. AWS, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud collectively accounted for 66 per cent of global cloud infrastructure spending.

But here is the twist that matters. Those headline investments are overwhelmingly concentrated in the United States and established European markets. The truly consequential decisions are happening elsewhere, in markets where the infrastructure is thinner, the regulatory landscape is more volatile, and the stakes for getting it wrong are considerably higher.

Synergy Research Group counted 1,297 operational hyperscale data centres worldwide as of late 2025, nearly triple the number from early 2018. Yet Africa accounts for less than one per cent of global data centre capacity, despite industry estimates indicating the continent needs at least 1,000 megawatts of new capacity across 700 additional facilities to meet demand. Latin America ranks fifth globally in hyperscale investment, with Brazil and Mexico leading. Southeast Asia, despite explosive internet growth, is still catching up. Indonesia alone has 280 million citizens, 200 million internet users, and a $1.4 trillion GDP growing at 5.1 per cent annually, yet 70 per cent of its data centre capacity remains concentrated in the Jakarta region. These areas represent the next great frontier for cloud and AI deployment. They also represent the places where the tension between global technology ambitions and local sovereignty demands is most acute.

Sovereignty Is Not a Feature Request

The concept of data sovereignty has shifted from a niche concern among privacy advocates to a central organising principle of national technology policy. In 2026, the landscape is defined by a rolling wave of legislation that is reshaping how hyperscalers operate in virtually every emerging market. Seventy-one per cent of organisations now cite cross-border data transfer compliance as their top regulatory challenge, reflecting the complexity of navigating what has become a genuinely fragmented global framework.

India's Digital Personal Data Protection Act entered its enforcement phase following the release of operational rules in November 2025. Organisations must now implement mandatory encryption, masking, tokenisation, and access controls, with breach notifications required within 72 hours and penalties reaching 250 crore rupees (approximately $30 million). But India's ambitions extend far beyond data protection. The IndiaAI Mission, launched in March 2024 with an initial budget of 10,300 crore rupees ($1.24 billion), has blown past its original target of 10,000 GPUs. Abhishek Singh, Additional Secretary at India's Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, revealed at the Accel AI Summit 2025 that the first two rounds of GPU tenders alone secured commitments for 34,000 units. A third tender added approximately 3,850 more, including for the first time 1,050 Google Trillium TPUs, pushing total capacity past 38,000 units available at a subsidised rate of just 65 rupees per hour. Sarvam AI was selected in April 2025 to build India's sovereign LLM ecosystem, developing an open-source 120 billion parameter model. BharatGen AI, India's first government-funded multimodal large language model, now supports 22 Indian languages. In the private sector, Reliance Industries is constructing a one-gigawatt data centre in Gujarat powered by NVIDIA Blackwell processors, estimated at $20 to $30 billion, while AWS has committed $12.7 billion to India through 2030 and Microsoft has pledged $3 billion for 2025 and 2026.

Brazil is pursuing an equally ambitious path. The Brazilian Artificial Intelligence Plan 2024 to 2028, titled “AI for the Good of All,” allocates approximately 23 billion reais to develop national computing infrastructure, sovereign cloud capabilities, and Portuguese-language foundation models. Of that, 5.7 billion reais is earmarked for a sovereign cloud operated by state firms Serpro and Dataprev, hosting a supercomputer for training Portuguese-language AI models. Another 2.3 billion reais goes toward domestic data centres powered by renewable energy, with priority given to the North and Northeast regions. The SoberanIA initiative, a collaboration between the government of Piauí, the Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation, Telebras, Modular, and Scala Data Centers, has built the world's largest Portuguese-language database for commercial AI use, expanding from 130 billion to 350 billion tokens. The initiative's infrastructure includes a Piauí AI Factory for model training and a Data Vault in Brasilia operated by Telebras in a Tier IV data centre within a military area, functioning as the sovereign repository for the state's strategic databases. The technology already powers applications like “Piauí Oportunidades,” which delivers personalised learning paths, and “BO Fácil,” which allows incident reports to be filed by voice through WhatsApp.

Indonesia is carving its own regulatory path. Government Regulation No. 71 of 2019 requires data for public services to be processed and stored domestically, reinforcing the need for local data centres. The country's National AI Strategy 2020 to 2045 positions artificial intelligence as a primary driver of the “Golden Indonesia 2045” development goal, with priority sectors in healthcare, bureaucratic reform, education, food security, and smart cities. The government is implementing a risk-based classification system similar to the EU AI Act. BDx Indonesia launched the country's first sovereign AI data centre in December 2024, powered by NVIDIA accelerated computing, and a $15 billion foreign direct investment pipeline is being attracted through regulatory reforms and tax holidays of up to 20 years for strategic projects.

Vietnam is writing its own chapter with its first statutory personal data protection law (Law No. 91/2025/QH15) and a national AI law taking effect on 1 March 2026. The UAE has established expectations under its Personal Data Protection Law, including consent requirements, transparency mandates, and cross-border transfer controls. Across Africa, 35 data protection authorities had become operational by 2024, though 15 jurisdictions still lack established regulatory frameworks despite having enacted comprehensive privacy legislation.

The pattern is unmistakable. Governments are no longer content to be passive consumers of technology produced elsewhere. They want to shape how AI is built, deployed, and governed within their borders.

Building the Sovereign Cloud

For hyperscalers, the response has been to invest heavily in what the industry now calls “sovereign cloud” infrastructure, physically and logically separated computing environments designed to keep data within national borders while still offering the scale and capability of global cloud platforms.

On 15 January 2026, AWS officially launched the European Sovereign Cloud, a completely independent infrastructure isolated from other AWS regions worldwide. Built with a committed investment of 7.8 billion euros, the first region went live in Germany. The offering features dedicated compute regions, a separate identity and access management system, and an independent billing system operating entirely within the European Union. The accompanying Sovereign Reference Framework describes how AWS implements and validates sovereignty controls, with each criterion treated as binding and subject to independent third-party auditing throughout 2026. AWS also introduced the Digital Sovereignty Well-Architected Lens, a framework designed to help organisations build workloads that are sovereign, compliance-aligned, and auditable while remaining interoperable and portable.

But the European Sovereign Cloud is just the most visible manifestation of a broader trend. AWS is investing $5.3 billion to build a new infrastructure region in Saudi Arabia, scheduled to launch in 2026 with three Availability Zones. The company has committed $12.7 billion to India through 2030, launched its Asia Pacific Malaysia region in August 2024 with a commitment of $6.2 billion, and is building a Chile region with more than $4 billion committed for expected completion by the end of 2026.

Microsoft is on a parallel track. The company invested $2.2 billion in Malaysia for cloud and AI infrastructure, pledged $300 million for AI infrastructure in South Africa with an aim to provide AI skills to one million South Africans by 2026, and is building a $1 billion geothermal-powered data centre in Kenya alongside a partnership with Abu Dhabi's G42 for a broader digital ecosystem investment. In Saudi Arabia, Microsoft completed three data centres and Azure Availability Zones in the Eastern Province as part of a broader $2.1 billion investment. In Nigeria, Microsoft is deploying in Lagos to provide low-latency services to fintech and oil and gas enterprises while aligning with the country's data localisation requirements.

Google has launched its Johannesburg cloud region, estimated at 2.5 billion rand in investment and part of a broader $1 billion digital initiative across Africa. Google's President for Europe, the Middle East, and Africa, Tara Brady, highlighted the potential to create 300,000 jobs and contribute 1.7 trillion rand to the South African economy. The company expanded to 42 cloud regions with 127 Availability Zones by 2025. Google's connectivity investments include the Equiano submarine cable along Africa's western seaboard and Umoja, the first fibre optic route to directly connect Africa with Australia. The company aims to reach 500 million Africans with AI-powered innovations by 2030.

The sovereign cloud market itself is projected to grow from $154 billion in 2025 to $823 billion by 2032. Nearly half of technology buyers surveyed expect their use of sovereign cloud for AI workloads to increase over the next two years.

When Explainability Becomes Law

Building data centres within national borders is one thing. Making AI systems transparent and explainable to local regulators is something else entirely, and it may prove to be the harder problem.

The EU AI Act, which became fully applicable on 2 August 2026, established the world's first comprehensive AI transparency framework. The Act defines transparency as meaning “that AI systems are developed and used in a way that allows appropriate traceability and explainability, while making humans aware that they communicate or interact with an AI system, as well as duly informing deployers of the capabilities and limitations of that AI system and affected persons about their rights.” High-risk AI systems must be designed to be “sufficiently transparent to enable deployers to interpret a system's output and use it appropriately.” Non-compliance carries penalties of up to 35 million euros or seven per cent of global annual turnover.

But the EU is far from alone. Australia's Privacy Act reforms, introduced in 2025, established mandatory transparency requirements for automated decision-making systems, requiring organisations to disclose algorithmic logic, data sources, and decision criteria to affected individuals. India's regulatory framework increasingly demands that AI systems used in governance be auditable and explainable. Brazil's pending AI legislation (PL 2338/2023), approved by the Federal Senate in December 2024 and forwarded to the Chamber of Deputies in March 2025, would mandate impact assessments for high-risk AI systems and proposes the creation of a national authority to oversee AI governance.

For hyperscalers, meeting these requirements means investing in explainability infrastructure adaptable to local regulatory contexts. Amazon's approach centres on two complementary platforms. SageMaker Clarify provides model-agnostic feature attribution using techniques such as SHAP to provide per-instance explanations during inference, and includes fairness and bias detection tools. Amazon Bedrock offers Chain-of-Thought reasoning traces through Bedrock Agents, showing step-by-step logic behind each decision. Bedrock Guardrails provides configurable safeguards including model cards with detailed bias metrics and built-in evaluation datasets like BOLD, which assesses fairness across categories including profession, gender, and race. The platform also features Bedrock Data Automation, which offers visual grounding with confidence scores for explainability and built-in hallucination mitigation. All of these capabilities integrate with monitoring and logging systems in scope for compliance standards including ISO, SOC, CSA STAR Level 2, and GDPR.

These tools are not decorative. They are increasingly becoming prerequisites for operating in regulated markets. The challenge is that different jurisdictions define “explainability” differently. What satisfies European regulators may not meet Indian requirements for citizen-facing AI systems, and neither may align with Saudi Arabia's vision for sovereign AI that operates within the cultural and linguistic frameworks of the Arabic-speaking world. Model cards, which are rapidly becoming a cornerstone of responsible AI strategy, illustrate this tension. Originally designed as static documentation, they are evolving into dynamic tools integrated directly into the AI lifecycle. But their content, structure, and level of detail must be adapted to each jurisdiction's expectations.

The result is a growing demand for what might be called “regulatory localisation” of AI systems. It is not enough to build a model that works. You need to build a model that can explain itself in ways that satisfy the specific legal, cultural, and institutional expectations of each market where it operates.

Language, Culture, and the Limits of One-Size-Fits-All

The sovereignty movement is forcing hyperscalers to confront a deeper truth about AI: that language and culture are not merely surface-level features to be localised through translation. They are structural elements that shape how AI systems understand and represent the world.

Saudi Arabia's ALLAM 34B is a case in point. Built specifically for Arabic, it represents a fundamentally different approach from taking an English-language model and bolting on Arabic capabilities. SDAIA, the Saudi Data and AI Authority, established in 2019, is working with NVIDIA to deploy up to 5,000 Blackwell GPUs for a sovereign AI factory, while also training government and university scientists on developing models for physical and agentic AI. NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang, speaking at the partnership announcement, framed the stakes plainly: “AI, like electricity and internet, is essential infrastructure for every nation.” The ambition is to create AI systems that understand Arabic not as a foreign language but as a native one, with all the cultural nuance, historical context, and institutional knowledge that entails.

India's BharatGen AI, supporting 22 languages, and Brazil's SoberanIA project, built on a 350 billion token Portuguese-language database with assured governance for commercial use, represent similar philosophical commitments. These are not merely technical projects. They are assertions of cultural and linguistic independence in a domain overwhelmingly dominated by English-language systems developed in Silicon Valley.

For hyperscalers, this creates a strategic dilemma. Their business model depends on scale, on building standardised platforms that can serve customers anywhere with minimal customisation. But the sovereignty movement pushes in the opposite direction, toward fragmentation, localisation, and the proliferation of distinct regulatory and cultural requirements that cannot be satisfied by a single global architecture.

The most sophisticated response so far has been to create layered platforms combining global infrastructure with local adaptation. AWS's approach through Bedrock allows customers to fine-tune foundation models on proprietary data within sovereign cloud environments, meeting both performance and compliance requirements. Microsoft's commitment to processing Microsoft 365 Copilot interactions in-country for 15 nations by the end of 2026, with Australia, India, Japan, and the United Kingdom gaining in-country AI processing in 2025, represents a similar acknowledgement that proximity matters, not just for latency but for trust.

But layered platforms only solve part of the problem. The harder question is whether hyperscalers can genuinely accommodate governance models that may conflict with their commercial interests.

How Localised Rules Are Reshaping Global Standards

Here is where the story gets genuinely interesting. The conventional wisdom assumes that the proliferation of local AI regulations will create a fragmented, burdensome compliance landscape that benefits nobody. But there is a plausible alternative scenario in which local experimentation eventually drives convergence toward higher global standards.

The EU AI Act is already serving as a template. Brazil's pending legislation explicitly adopts its risk-based architecture. Vietnam's new AI law draws on similar principles. Indonesia's evolving regulatory framework distinguishes between prohibited practices, high-risk applications, and limited-risk systems in a manner that closely mirrors the European model. The pattern resembles what happened with data protection after the GDPR: the European regulation became the de facto global standard, not because every country copied it exactly, but because the cost of building separate systems for each jurisdiction incentivised companies to adopt the highest common standard everywhere.

The UN's Global Digital Compact, adopted by 193 member states in September 2024, and the Global Dialogue on AI Governance, established by the UN General Assembly in August 2025 through Resolution A/RES/79/325, are creating multilateral forums for exactly this kind of convergence. The first annual gathering is planned for the 2026 AI for Good Global Summit in Geneva. UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres outlined clear goals: building safe, secure, and trustworthy AI systems grounded in international law; promoting interoperability between governance regimes; and encouraging open innovation accessible to all. An Independent International Scientific Panel on AI, the first global scientific body of its kind, has been established to assess how AI is transforming societies.

The Global Cross-Border Privacy Rules Forum, which launched its certification systems on 2 June 2025, represents another vector of convergence. With nine member jurisdictions (including Australia, Canada, Japan, Singapore, and the United States) and four associate members spanning six continents, the Forum establishes harmonised requirements for sensitive data processing, children's protection protocols, and standardised breach notification timelines. Nigeria recently joined as an associate member, while the Dubai International Financial Centre became a full member, signalling that emerging markets are actively shaping these international frameworks. The Global Cooperation Arrangement for Privacy Enforcement, established in October 2023, facilitates cross-border enforcement actions between participating authorities, including the UK Information Commissioner's Office and the US Federal Trade Commission.

The question is whether hyperscalers will resist this convergence or embrace it as a means of reducing compliance complexity. The early evidence is mixed. The United States came out in strong opposition to multilateral AI governance initiatives at a UN Security Council debate in September 2025. Yet companies like Amazon, Microsoft, and Google continue to invest billions in sovereign infrastructure that implicitly accepts the legitimacy of local regulatory authority.

The Monetisation Gap and Its Political Consequences

There is one more dimension to this story that deserves attention: money. AI-related services are expected to deliver only about $25 billion in revenue in 2025, roughly ten per cent of what hyperscalers are spending on infrastructure. Only about 25 per cent of AI initiatives have delivered their expected return on investment. Morgan Stanley and JP Morgan project that the technology sector may need to issue $1.5 trillion in new debt over the next few years to finance AI infrastructure construction. The disconnect is stark: hyperscalers are transforming from historically cash-funded business models into leveraged ones, betting that AI adoption will eventually catch up to the enormous capital outlays.

This gap between investment and return creates political vulnerability, particularly in emerging markets. Governments that have welcomed hyperscaler investment with tax incentives and expedited permitting will eventually demand results. Indonesia's experience offers a cautionary tale: research has demonstrated that the country's increasing data restrictiveness between 2013 and 2018 led to measurable economic harm, reducing trade output by 9.1 per cent, decreasing productivity by 3.7 per cent, and increasing downstream prices by 1.9 per cent over five years. If AI infrastructure does not deliver measurable economic benefits to local populations, the backlash could be severe.

The smartest hyperscalers understand this. Microsoft's commitment to providing AI skills to one million South Africans by 2026, Google's target of reaching 500 million Africans with AI-powered innovations by 2030, and India's programme to train 115,000 civil servants in AI fundamentals are all attempts to ensure that the social licence to operate keeps pace with the rate of capital deployment.

But skills training alone will not be sufficient. The deeper challenge is ensuring that sovereign AI systems actually work, that they deliver tangible improvements in healthcare, education, agriculture, and governance that justify the enormous investments being made. Brazil's SoberanIA already demonstrates what this can look like in practice, with applications ranging from personalised learning to voice-enabled government services now available to public managers from any region. India's BharatGen AI is being deployed across multiple sectors with explicit goals around inclusive growth. Saudi Arabia's HUMAIN is targeting energy, healthcare, manufacturing, and financial services. Africa's AI market is expected to grow from $4.51 billion in 2025 to $16.53 billion by 2030, at a compound annual growth rate of 27.42 per cent, with Cassava Technologies rolling out NVIDIA-powered AI factories starting in South Africa and expanding to Egypt, Kenya, Morocco, and Nigeria.

Intelligent Independence as a Design Principle

The phrase that keeps surfacing in policy documents and executive presentations across the Global South is “intelligent independence.” It captures something important about this moment. The countries building sovereign AI infrastructure are not trying to cut themselves off from the global technology ecosystem. They are trying to participate in it on their own terms. As one analysis of Brazil's approach noted, the pursuit of digital sovereignty “should not be confused with the notion of technological self-sufficiency, which remains unrealistic in the short and medium term.” What is emerging instead is an agenda of relative autonomy, in which countries seek to reduce critical vulnerabilities without isolating themselves from global innovation networks.

For hyperscalers, this means that the era of building technology and exporting it wholesale is giving way to something more collaborative and more constrained. The companies that thrive will be the ones that can operate as genuine partners, contributing infrastructure, expertise, and capital while ceding meaningful control over governance, transparency, and cultural adaptation to the countries where they operate.

This is not a comfortable position for companies accustomed to setting the rules of the game. But it may be the only viable strategy in a world where sovereign cloud spending is projected to quintuple in seven years, where the next billion internet users will predominantly come from Asia, Africa, the Middle East, and Latin America, and where every one of those users will be governed by data protection and AI transparency laws that did not exist five years ago.

The infrastructure is being built. The regulations are being written. The models are being trained in Arabic, Portuguese, Hindi, and 22 other Indian languages. The question that remains is whether the global AI ecosystem that emerges from this period of intense localisation will be more fragmented or more resilient than the one it replaces. The answer will depend less on the technology itself and more on whether the companies building it can learn to operate in a world where sovereignty is not an obstacle to be overcome but a feature to be designed for.

---

References and Sources

1. IEEE ComSoc Technology Blog, “Hyperscaler capex > $600 bn in 2026,” December 2025. https://techblog.comsoc.org/2025/12/22/hyperscaler-capex-600-bn-in-2026-a-36-increase-over-2025-while-global-spending-on-cloud-infrastructure-services-skyrockets/

2. Data Center Knowledge, “AI-First Hyperscalers: 2026's Sprint Meets the Power Bottleneck,” 2026. https://www.datacenterknowledge.com/hyperscalers/hyperscalers-in-2026-what-s-next-for-the-world-s-largest-data-center-operators-

3. Data Center Frontier, “Amazon Doubles Down on AI Infrastructure with $30B in New U.S. Data Center Investments,” 2025. https://www.datacenterfrontier.com/hyperscale/article/55295967/amazon-doubles-down-on-ai-infrastructure-with-30b-in-new-us-data-center-investments

4. McKinsey & Company, “The cost of compute: A $7 trillion race to scale data centers,” 2025. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/technology-media-and-telecommunications/our-insights/the-cost-of-compute-a-7-trillion-dollar-race-to-scale-data-centers

5. McKinsey & Company, “AI power: Expanding data center capacity to meet growing demand,” 2025. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/technology-media-and-telecommunications/our-insights/ai-power-expanding-data-center-capacity-to-meet-growing-demand

6. Future Privacy Forum, “2026: A Year at the Crossroads for Global Data Protection and Privacy,” 2026. https://fpf.org/blog/2026-a-year-at-the-crossroads-for-global-data-protection-and-privacy/

7. AWS, “European Digital Sovereignty,” 2026. https://aws.amazon.com/compliance/europe-digital-sovereignty/

8. CIO Dive, “AWS European Sovereign Cloud goes live,” January 2026. https://www.ciodive.com/news/aws-european-sovereign-cloud-live/809794/

9. AWS Security Blog, “Exploring the AWS European Sovereign Cloud: Sovereign Reference Framework,” 2025. https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/security/exploring-the-new-aws-european-sovereign-cloud-sovereign-reference-framework/

10. EU Artificial Intelligence Act, “Article 13: Transparency and Provision of Information to Deployers,” 2024. https://artificialintelligenceact.eu/article/13/

11. EU Artificial Intelligence Act, “Article 50: Transparency Obligations,” 2024. https://artificialintelligenceact.eu/article/50/

12. CIO, “AWS to invest $5.3B in Saudi Arabia data centers,” 2024. https://www.cio.com/article/1311730/aws-to-invest-5-3-to-build-data-centers-in-saudi-arabia-to-bolster-tech-in-the-region.html

13. About Amazon, “AWS and HUMAIN announce a more than $5B investment,” 2025. https://www.aboutamazon.com/news/company-news/amazon-aws-humain-ai-investment-in-saudi-arabia

14. CNBC, “Saudi AI firm Humain is pouring billions into data centers,” August 2025. https://www.cnbc.com/2025/08/27/saudi-arabia-wants-to-be-worlds-third-largest-ai-provider-humain.html

15. CIO, “HUMAIN: Saudi Arabia's bold bet on sovereign AI and Arabic LLMs,” 2025. https://www.cio.com/article/3984044/humain-saudi-arabias-bold-bet-on-sovereign-ai-and-arabic-llms.html

16. NVIDIA Newsroom, “Saudi Arabia and NVIDIA to Build AI Factories,” May 2025. https://nvidianews.nvidia.com/news/saudi-arabia-and-nvidia-to-build-ai-factories-to-power-next-wave-of-intelligence-for-the-age-of-reasoning

17. Datacenters.com, “Microsoft's Africa Push: New Data Center Investments,” 2025. https://www.datacenters.com/news/microsoft-s-africa-push-how-new-data-center-investments-are-redrawing-global-maps

18. Google Blog, “Investing in connectivity, products and skills for Africa's AI future,” 2025. https://blog.google/around-the-globe/google-africa/africas-ai-future/

19. Data Centre Magazine, “Google's Strategy for AI Data Centres in Africa,” 2025. https://datacentremagazine.com/news/googles-investment-in-african-ai-infrastructure-explained

20. Data Center Dynamics, “Indian government launches $1.2bn IndiaAI mission,” 2024. https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/news/indian-government-launches-12bn-indiaai-mission-plans-10000-gpu-supercomputer/

21. Press Information Bureau, India, “India's Common Compute Capacity Crosses 34,000 GPUs,” 2025. https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2132817

22. Business Standard, “India doubles down on AI with Rs 10,000 crore fund,” June 2025. https://www.business-standard.com/industry/news/india-doubles-down-on-ai-with-rs-10-000-crore-fund-50-000-gpu-ambition-125060500096_1.html

23. DD News India, “Transforming India with AI: Rs 10,300 crore mission, 38,000 GPUs,” 2025. https://ddnews.gov.in/en/transforming-india-with-ai-rs-10300-crore-mission-38000-gpus-a-vision-for-inclusive-growth/

24. Library of Congress, “Brazil: Senate Advances Discussions on Bill to Regulate AI Use,” May 2025. https://www.loc.gov/item/global-legal-monitor/2025-05-23/brazil-senate-advances-discussions-on-bill-to-regulate-ai-use/

25. Chambers and Partners, “Artificial Intelligence 2025 – Brazil,” 2025. https://practiceguides.chambers.com/practice-guides/artificial-intelligence-2025/brazil/trends-and-developments

26. TI Inside Online, “SoberanIA forms alliance to deploy the largest AI infrastructure in Latin America,” December 2025. https://tiinside.com.br/en/09/12/2025/soberania-firma-alianca-para-implantar-no-brasil-a-maior-infraestrutura-de-ia-da-america-latina/

27. BNamericas, “Brazil inks partnership with Scala Data Centers for sovereign AI infrastructure,” 2025. https://www.bnamericas.com/en/features/brazil-inks-partnership-with-scala-data-centers-for-sovereign-ai-infrastructure

28. UNCTAD, “Brazil Launches the Brazilian Artificial Intelligence Plan 2024-2028,” 2024. https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/investment-policy-monitor/measures/4930/launches-the-brazilian-artificial-intelligence-plan-2024-2028

29. ITIF, “Indonesia's Data Localization Regulation,” June 2025. https://itif.org/publications/2025/06/09/indonesia-data-localization-regulation/

30. Introl Blog, “Indonesia's First Sovereign AI Data Center,” 2025. https://introl.com/blog/indonesia-first-sovereign-ai-data-center-market-analysis

31. SSEK Law Firm, “Regulation of Artificial Intelligence in Indonesia,” 2025. https://ssek.com/blog/indonesia-law-update-regulation-of-artificial-intelligence/

32. Tony Blair Institute, “Sovereignty in the Age of AI,” 2025. https://institute.global/insights/tech-and-digitalisation/sovereignty-in-the-age-of-ai-strategic-choices-structural-dependencies

33. UN Global Digital Compact, “AI Panel and Dialogue,” 2025. https://www.un.org/global-digital-compact/en/ai

34. CSIS, “What the UN Global Dialogue on AI Governance Reveals About Global Power Shifts,” 2025. https://www.csis.org/analysis/what-un-global-dialogue-ai-governance-reveals-about-global-power-shifts

35. World Economic Forum, “The UN's new AI governance bodies explained,” October 2025. https://www.weforum.org/stories/2025/10/un-new-ai-governance-bodies/

36. Inside Privacy, “Global CBPR and PRP Certifications Launched,” June 2025. https://www.insideprivacy.com/cross-border-transfers/global-cbpr-and-prp-certifications-launched-a-new-international-data-transfer-mechanism/

37. Amazon SageMaker AI Documentation, “Model Explainability,” 2025. https://docs.aws.amazon.com/sagemaker/latest/dg/clarify-model-explainability.html

38. Amazon Bedrock, “Build genAI applications at production scale,” 2025. https://aws.amazon.com/bedrock/

39. Tech in Africa, “North vs. Sub-Saharan Africa: AI Investment Trends,” 2025. https://www.techinafrica.com/north-vs-sub-saharan-africa-ai-investment-trends/

40. Cogent, “The XAI Reckoning: Turning Explainability Into a Compliance Requirement by 2026,” 2025. https://www.cogentinfo.com/resources/the-xai-reckoning-turning-explainability-into-a-compliance-requirement-by-2026

---

Tim Green UK-based Systems Theorist & Independent Technology Writer

Tim explores the intersections of artificial intelligence, decentralised cognition, and posthuman ethics. His work, published at smarterarticles.co.uk, challenges dominant narratives of technological progress while proposing interdisciplinary frameworks for collective intelligence and digital stewardship.

His writing has been featured on Ground News and shared by independent researchers across both academic and technological communities.

ORCID: 0009-0002-0156-9795 Email: tim@smarterarticles.co.uk

In Summary: * And another quiet Friday in the Roscoe-verse winds down. Nothing particularly noteworthy happened here, I'm happy to say. As to noteworthy things happening elswhere... who knows? There is so darned much fake news floating around, and with CGI and AI buffonery every where these days... well, keeping prayed up is really important. And I'm doing the best I can at that.

Prayers, etc.: * I have a daily prayer regimen I try to follow throughout the day from early morning, as soon as I roll out of bed, until head hits pillow at night. Details of that regimen are linked to my link tree, which is linked to my profile page here.

Starting Ash Wednesday, 2026, I've added this daily prayer as part of the Prayer Crusade Preceding the 2026 SSPX Episcopal Consecrations.

Health Metrics: * bw= 229.83 lbs. * bp= 129/76 (67)

Exercise: * morning stretches, balance exercises, kegel pelvic floor exercises, half squats, calf raises, wall push-ups

Diet: * 06:30 – 1 ham & cheese sandwich, 1 banana * 07:15 – 2 cookies, 1 bean & cheese breakfast taco * 09:55 – 2 more cookies * 12:30 – egg drop soup, rangoon, Mongolian beef lunch plate, fried rice * 15:30 – more fried rice * 16:00 – 1 fresh apple

Activities, Chores, etc.: * 05:00 – listen to local news talk radio * 06:15 – bank accounts activity monitored * 06:50 – read, write, pray, follow news reports from various sources, surf the socials, and nap * 12:15 to 13:15 – watch old game shows and eat lunch at home with Sylvia * 13:30 – watch MLB Spring Training, St. Louis Cardinals are playing the Baltimore Orioles ATM. Cardinals are leading 3 to 1 in the top of the 6th inning. * 14:00 – Now following my Friday Game of the Day: an MLB Spring Training Game between my Texas Rangers and the Seattle Mariners. I don't have access to a video feed, but I am getting the score and ALL stats updated in real time on an MLB Gameday screen. And I'm getting the radio call of the game from Seattle's KIRO 760 AM. GO RANGERS! * 16:45 – And Seattle wins. Final score 5 to 1.

Chess: * 17:10 – moved in all pending CC games