Want to join in? Respond to our weekly writing prompts, open to everyone.
Want to join in? Respond to our weekly writing prompts, open to everyone.
from
Unattributed
I stated the other day that I was surprised my former web host emailed me asking for feedback after I'd closed out my account. No survey, or feedback form, just a straightforward email.
And now I am surprised again. Why? Yesterday morning I received a response to that email. Only nine or ten hours after I sent it. And, much to my pleasure, the representative largely understood what I was talking about. She had some interesting and relevant comments.
So, here I am, presenting part two of this email exchange. I plan to respond to her email to clear up a minor mis-perception I think she has, but otherwise I feel like she's really taking my feedback and handling it properly.
(And this is something I have to say… I have respect for all the people I worked with at this host. They were very professional, responsive, and good at resolving issues. This email is further indication of the customer service this hosting service provided.)
First of all, thank you for taking the time to share such thoughtful and detailed feedback. We genuinely appreciate the level of insight you provided, and I can tell this wasn’t a decision you made lightly.
I’m glad to hear that, overall, you found value in the infrastructure and services we built. At the same time, I completely understand the frustrations you experienced, especially with the recurring optimization issue and the feeling of having to repeatedly reapply fixes after updates. I can absolutely see how that would become frustrating over time, particularly when your setup was intentionally kept simple and close to the default WordPress experience.
Your comments regarding testing against default WordPress themes and preserving user-defined optimization settings are especially valuable, and I’ll be sure to pass that feedback along to the relevant team. Even though the underlying issue may have been more nuanced, the impact on your workflow was very real, and that matters.
I also appreciate your honesty about pricing and feature fit. It makes complete sense that a platform designed for agencies, developers, and more complex website management can feel excessive when your primary focus is writing rather than maintaining large-scale web infrastructure. Sometimes the best solution is the one that stays out of the way and lets you focus on the work you actually care about.
And regarding WordPress itself, while experiences and preferences naturally vary, I can certainly understand your perspective on how the platform has evolved over the years. For users whose priority is writing efficiency and simplicity, the shift toward block-based editing and increasingly visual workflows hasn’t always been a welcome change. It’s clear you’ve given a lot of thought to your workflow and the tools that best support it, and it sounds like you’ve found an approach that aligns much more closely with how you prefer to work.
It’s great to hear that you were able to migrate your sites successfully and settle into a solution that better fits both your workflow and your budget.
Thank you again for having been with us and for giving our platform a chance over the years. We truly appreciate your support, your candid feedback, and the professionalism with which you shared your experience.
Wishing you all the best with your writing and your new setup moving forward.
Categories: #Article, #Feature Tags: #Webhosting, #Customer-Service, #email, #rants
from Faucet Repair
23 June 2026
Saw Shao Fan's show Refrain | 复沓 at White Cube this morning—wonderful work. First time in a while that such large paintings have felt justified. Deep sensitivity in all aspects, a practice of looking and re-looking, and a lived engagement with antiquity that generates work with an intensity that truly honors his subjects both human and nonhuman. There are a few stunners, but Fruit 1924 (2024) and Rabbit Portrait 1025 (2025)—both large ink on rice paper works—are with me the most right now. Fruit has an almost paper-like two-dimensionality; it's an apple sliced in half to reveal a core that becomes a network of overlapping planes and openings. Starts to become a skull-like memento mori the longer you look at it. Rabbit manages to achieve an unflinchingly direct and confrontational quality through symmetry without locking itself off in any way (which is something that usually doesn't sit well with me)—the odd strands of hair/whiskers whimsically trail off beyond their defining limits, and certain elements like the white of the rabbit's ears remain true to the eye rather than an ideal, so my feeling is that the impressive balance comes more from an endearing emotional groundedness than a technical fastidiousness.
from Sprachabenteuer
Umziehen: 19. Juni
Heute ist der Tag des Umzugs und inhaltlich natürlich nicht besonders spannend. Aber nicht nur unsere Unterkunft verändert sich – auch das Wetter macht gerade große Schritte. Schon gestern war es hier sehr heiß, und ab jetzt steigt die Temperatur offenbar täglich weiter.
Ein bisschen traurig war es schon zu entdecken, dass unser neues Hotel keine Klimaanlage hat. Na gut – es gibt eben immer Raum für Verbesserungen. So ist auch der Mensch: Er findet immer etwas, worüber er sich beschweren kann. Wenn der Sommer kälter ist, warte ich auf wärmeres Wetter. Und jetzt, wo es heiß ist, beschwere ich mich wieder. Trotzdem versuche ich, diesen Teil von mir ein bisschen zu kontrollieren! Meine Freude über die neue Unterkunft kann das jedenfalls nicht so leicht mindern.
Ich kann übrigens auch feststellen, dass die Wäschereien in Berlin toll sind – wenn auch ein bisschen teuer. Umso praktischer ist es, in der Nähe meiner Freundin zu wohnen. Sie kann mir diesen Service nämlich kostenlos anbieten! Nur zur Information: Zwei Waschladungen (helle und dunkle Kleidung) und 30 Minuten Trocknen kosten hier 17 Euro.
Unser Apartment – oder sagen wir: zumindest kein Loch mehr – hat jetzt auch einen Teppich! Unsere Hunde sind daran nicht besonders gewöhnt. Hoffen wir also, dass sie den Sinn dieses Teppichs nicht falsch verstehen. Bei meiner früheren Arbeit dachte Begemotas zum Beispiel einmal, dass man auf einen Teppich ruhig kacken darf. Aber das war noch in seinen jüngeren Jahren.
Was außerdem anstrengend ist: Wir haben immer unglaublich viele Sachen und Gepäck dabei. Wir reisen also nicht besonders ökonomisch. Das liegt auch daran, dass wir uns unterwegs nicht so einfach alles Nötige besorgen können. In Zukunft möchte ich deshalb nicht nur meine Deutschkenntnisse verbessern, sondern auch meine Packfähigkeiten. Schließlich muss ich einen Teil dieser Sachen auch selbst tragen – und das dauert nicht nur, sondern macht mich auch müde.
Ich habe sogar ein Foto von der großen Menge an Taschen und Gepäck gemacht, aber ich weiß noch nicht, wie man auf dieser Seite Bilder hochladen kann.
Insgesamt kann ich sagen, dass mir dieses günstige Hotel wirklich sehr gut gefallen hat – abgesehen von dem kaputten Aufzug. Wenn also jemand eine preiswerte Unterkunft in Berlin sucht, darf man sich gern bei mir melden!
from spotidown.me
SpotiDown is an easy-to-use online platform that allows users to download Spotify music for offline listening. By simply pasting a Spotify track, album, or playlist link, users can quickly access downloadable audio files without installing any software. The service is compatible with desktops, tablets, and smartphones, making it a convenient solution for music lovers who want fast, browser-based access to their favorite songs anytime and anywhere. Visit our site: https://spotidown.me/en1
from spotidownme
spotidownme https://spotidown.me/en1 SpotiDown is an online Spotify downloader and converter. It is designed to process Spotify links and convert the associated content into downloadable audio files. Unlike traditional desktop applications, SpotiDown works directly within a web browser, meaning users do not need to install additional software.
The platform advertises itself as a free service capable of handling:
spotidown spotidownme spotidown.me spotidownloader spotifydownloader
from Libretica
Este artículo es parte de una práctica de la universidad que ya he entregado. En el ejercicio, teníamos que elegir una sala expositiva real e intentar pensar modos de intervención que ayudasen a las obras existentes a dialogar con otras obras nuevas.
IMPORTANTE: Todo lo descrito aquí es especulativo, no se ha hecho ni se ha expuesto al verdadero museo. Sólo he elegido la sala y museo por mi propio cariño al espacio y mi interés por Granada y Al-Andalus.
El museo seleccionado es el museo de la Alhambra, se trata de una serie de salas una detrás de otra que se encuentran a la derecha de la entrada principal del Palacio de CarlosV, junto a los Palacios Nazaríes. El museo, actualmente, presenta una colección principalmente arqueológica,mostrando elementos relacionados con la Alhambra y Granada, como leones originales del Patio de los leones, cerámicas andalusíes, alicatado y herramientas, entre otros objetos. Este museo se encuentra jutno al Museo de Bellas Artes (comparten edificio), con pinturas emblemáticas de la ciudad y sus artistas.
Se trata de siete salas una seguida detrás de otra, que recorren el Palacio en su costado derecho. Las temáticas de las salas son:
Sala I: La ciencia, la fe y la economía Sala II: Periodo emiral y califal Sala III: Decoración arquitectónica califal y arte taifa al nazarí Sala IV: Período nazarí, edificios públicos Sala V: Periodo nazarí. La Alhambra y otros palacios de la ciudad Sala VI: Periodo nazarí. La rauda, la cerámica de lujo Sala VII: Periodo nazarí. La decoración y el ajuar.
Aunque cualquier sala se presta a este ejercicio, he elegido la sala V, donde se encuentra una de las piezas fundamentales de la colección (el Jarrón de las Gacelas) y otras piezas seleccionadas. La sala actualmente gira (literalmente) alrededor del Jarrón, pero muestra obras de taracea, ejemplos de alicatado y carpintería nazarí. He visitado el museo recientemente (13 de junio) , aunque no sea la primera vez, y he podido observar cómo el jarrón es lo primero que atrapa al visitante, ya sea por la iluminación o por estar en el centro, también porque es muy grande y es lo primero que se avista desde la entrada a la sala. El resto de obras bailan alrededor y tienen una narrativa que honra a la artesanía. La sensación que da es de admiración.
He elegido esta sala por varios motivos. Por un lado, esa narrativa centrada en la artesanía girando entorno a una pieza creo que da juego a la hora de incluir artesanías contemporáneas inspiradas en el legado nazarí. Por otro lado, siento una atracción fuerte por el jarrón, desde que lo vi en una exhibición anterior sobre cerámica nazarí. Me gustó tanto que me regalaron el catálogo especial de la exposición poco después, y siendo la pieza central de la sala, esa atracción personal creo que es relevante. Quería, además, usar los contextos y artículos de la publicación para el desarrollo de la práctica. He hecho un plano y análisis de la sala actual en mi libreta, y será sobre lo que trabaje como boceto:

Como menciono en la sección anterior, la narrativa actual de la sala se centra en la artesanía nazarí, y destaca en el centro una pieza sorprendente, absorbiendo un claro protagonismo. El resto de piezas, que incluyen alicatado, las hojas de la puerta de cierre a la Qubba Mayor, los restos de solerías del Peinador de la Reina, Las puertas de alhacena del palacio de los Infantes, celosías, una colección de cerámica pintada con temas figurativos y de geometría, vidrios y otros (los he listado por posición en la libreta arriba).
Al entrar a la sala, esta está primero partida por un mueble-cristalera expositivo que funciona como pared. Pero una vez traspasada esta falsa pared, lo primero que destaca es el jarrón de las Gacelas.
El planteamiento curatorial sería una revisión de la artesanía contemporánea en cerámica y madera que se haya inspirado en las técnicas y la estética nazarí. Para ello, se incluirían displays con obras contemporáneas, también alrededor del jarrón. La idea es que las piezas dialoguen con los elementos actuales, y que su proximidad de indicios de relación, haciendo una selección que sea intuitiva para el visitante.
Aunque no sea una limitación estricta, me gustaría seleccionar artistas locales que dialoguen con las obras de una forma íntima, más allá de lo académico, a través de la proximidad y la ubicuidad de lo nazarí en el día a día. Esto no quiere decir que otras obras puedan encajar en la narrativa. Para empezar, en la entrada, junto a la puerta, colocaría un panel informativo.
La lista de artistas ha sido eliminada de este post, ya que no se ha pedido permiso, y he preferido dejarlo en el entorno académico, pero son dos pintores/dibujantes y una ceramista.
Además de les artistes seleccionades, dado que la narrativa de la sala gira entorno a la artesanía, he pensado en incluir detalles de alumnos de restauración y módulos de formación profesional relacionados con artesanías de granada, tales como los ciclos de alfarería, orfebrería y ornamentación islámica. El alumnado de restauración ha participado en diversas exhibiciones de Granada. Por ejemplo, en el Colegio Máximo, donde hay exposiciones itinerantes que comparten espacio con la facultad de documentación y comunicación, el alumnado de restauración ayudó a crear reproducciones de herramientas y objetos cotidianos de al-Andalus para una de las exhibiciones. Considero que incluir una vitrina con muestras e información de alumnado de este tipo, resalta la discusión acerca de la artesanía y el arte, sus divisiones y sus espacios comunes (Richard Sennet, El artesano; Larry Shiner, La invención del arte). En la sección siguiente incluyo detalles sobre este planteamiento.
Para encajar un aura diferente en la sala, utilizaría un tono musical específico, diferenciado, acompañado de una proyección geométrica. Una opción que podría encajar sería la generación de tonos de música basados en geometrías, por ejemplo en este caso se está utilizando un hexágono para general un tono musical con ayuda de un programa (no es IA), o hecho de cero por une artiste local a través de librerías disponibles de Python, BASH, etc (La Madraza, que coordina arte contemporáneo en Granada a través de la UGR, promociona el livecoding con artistas locales). Incluiría una placa con una nota al respecto cerca de alguna de las piezas de patrones geométricos de la colección.
He tomado algunas notas sobre el boceto original de la sala, y he seleccionado algunas fotos que ayuden a hacerse una idea de dónde y cómo se colocarían las modificaciones de la sala. Mi idea original es no interrumpir con las obras originales, si no crear un nuevo diálogo añadiendo objetos. Para ello, tomé algunas indicaciones previas para guiarme:
No recargar la sala: he eliminado de la selección final un par de artistas que había anotado inicialmente (un luthier y un dibujante). Como he decidido mantener las obras originales y sólo añadir, es fácil recargar la sala y generar una cacofonía visual, que es lo opuesto a lo que quiero. Por ello, tenía que comprobar la disponibilidad de la sala para modificar puntos clave dejando más o menos el mismo espacio disponible para la mirada al vacío y para moverse.
Iluminación y sonido: Utilizar recursos de ambiente para dejar claro que la sala es diferente a las demás, y dar espacio mental a los visitantes para hacerse a esa idea desde el comienzo.
Accesibilidad: Irrumpir lo menos posible en la accesibilidad, haciendo posible por ejemplo el paso de sillas de ruedas o espacio suficiente para personas con movilidad reducida. Antes de hacer este grado, realicé el grado de ingeniería informática, y como parte de unas prácticas realicé una aplicación de accesibilidad para un museo, para lo cual tuve que estudiar cuestiones de accesibilidad tanto motora como sensorial e intelectual. He “re-aprovechado” las notas que tomé entonces.
Narrativa: Teniendo en cuenta todo lo anterior, quería centrarme en destacar la artesanía, su relación con el “cubo blanco”, y su cercanía con las bellas artes.
Para empezar, para que los visitantes tengan el primer contacto, al entrar por la puerta colocaría una proyección sobre el suelo de la entrada, que acompañe a la música generada a través de algoritmos de geometría. Por ejemplo si usamos una melodía como esta, la proyección sería esa figura. De este modo, ya estamos “pausando” a las visitantes. Justo al lado de la puerta, colocaría un panel informativo sobre la exposición que pone en diálogo restos arqueológicos y artesanías/artes contemporáneas.
De este modo estamos dando una introducción con pistas visuales y sonoras (más el panel) de que algo es diferente, cambiando la predisposición de las visitantes, pero sin irrumpir con las piezas originalmente expuestas ni el espacio para moverse y acceder. A continuación, al entrar por la derecha para pasar tras la falsa pared-mueble expositivo, comenzamos a incluir las obras mencionadas. Mi propuesta sería, para empezar, colocar colgando de la barra donde están las luces led (pared izquierda), sobre los alicatados, Dibujos y pinturas. Las piezas originales tienen un QR al lado para explicar la pieza, creo que algo similar encajaría en este caso, además de una plaquita con el nombre de la pieza, la autora y autor y materiales+técnica.
Para continuar, la cerámica podría dialogar tanto con las cerámicas de la vitrina como con el jarrón de las gacelas, pero quiero evitar el efecto “comparación”. No querría que las visitantes tendieran a comparar ambas, si no que vieran la influencia y los lazos que las unen a través del tiempo. Por ello, se me ocurre colocar la pieza cerámica en la esquina que crea el mueble expositor (que en ese espacio no tiene nada, solo es madera) y en el suelo colocar unos vinilos con líneas y surcos de una infografía visual, como la utilizada por artistas para el estudio de sus proyectos. Estas líneas interactúan con los objetos de la sala, por ejemplo señalando al jarrón y con una nota de fuente tipo “escrito a mano” diciendo “estudia/investiga” y otra línea que se dirige a las cerámicas y alicatados con notas tipo “hereda de”, y otras notas a parte, incluyendo con las del alumnado de artesanías, que presento en breve.
Finalmente, el trabajo del alumnado de restauración y artesanías iría en una vitrina, donde está el panel informativo a la derecha de la sala. En lugar de sustituir el panel informativo, se colocaría una vitrina alargada + panel informativo actualizado donde venga parte de la información que ya hay (y un QR de “continuación”) además de información sobre estos estudios, las aportaciones a museos y notas sobre restauración, así como fotos. En la vitrina destacarían algunas obras, tanto acabadas como en proceso, de estos módulos y artesanos. Añadiría un QR justo en la zona de salida, también. El motivo es que muchas salas expositivas tienen entrada y salida por el mismo sitio, haciendo que las visitantes puedan hacer foto o recordar puntos clave al irse (a mi me pasa). Pero en este caso es una entre siete salas, así que la salida es diferente. De este modo, el QR sirve al mismo tiempo de “despedida” (indicando a las visitantes que pueden cambiar el “mood” de nuevo) y de recordatorio sobre información relacionada. Para ello habría que tener una web preparada.
Adicionalmente en el boceto he incluido cosas como que el estante para la cerámica tenga silica para mantener la pieza, y que incluyan la vidriera y ese mueble altavoces y braille.

Nota: no se ha usado I.A. en ninguna fase del proyecto. Las imágenes son bocetos y fotos mías o capturas de la web oficial.
from DrFox

from
Marshall Review
Is poor education to blame for the fact that so many native English speakers can’t use bring and take correctly? Or have we collectively lost the ability to imagine where we are standing at any given moment?
Last week I read a piece in the Irish Independent in which a prominent journalist wrote something along the lines of: “an injured person was brought to the hospital.”
Really? Brought?
Was the journalist personally accompanying the ambulance? Were they clinging to the back bumper with a notebook and a sense of duty? Of course not. They were at their desk, probably eating a sandwich.
The correct verb is taken. As in: “the injured person was taken to the hospital, while the reporter remained safely at their keyboard.”
Where was the sub‑editor? Possibly also at lunch, – perhaps nibbling on the other half of that sandwich.
But, bring and take aren’t decorative. They contain actual information about location – a concept that, judging by modern usage, is now considered optional – like ironing, or basic geography.
Take these two sentences:
- “I will bring my laptop from home to the office.”
Translation: I am currently at the office, and I am promising to arrive tomorrow with my laptop and, presumably, a sense of purpose.
- “I will take my laptop from home to the office.”
Translation: I am not at the office. I might be at home. I might be in a café. I might be in a field. But I am definitely not at the office.
Now consider:
“I’m going to bring my colleague to the airport” versus
“I’m going to take my colleague to the airport.”
If you say bring, you are speaking from the airport. Perhaps you live there now. Perhaps you’ve set up a small tent beside Departures? Perhaps I need to contact Focus Ireland on your behalf?
If you say take, you are somewhere else – anywhere else – but not at the airport.
This is not advanced linguistics. This is not quantum mechanics. This is kindergarten‑level spatial reasoning. And yet, somehow, it’s evaporating.
Maybe it’s laziness. Maybe it’s the collapse of editorial standards. Maybe we’ve all become so dependent on GPS that we no longer know where we are unless a mobile phone tells us.
But the distinction matters. Language loses something when we stop caring about perspective. And frankly, if we can’t manage bring and take, I fear for the future of lend and borrow.
“Borrow me your blue pencil, will you – the chief already has a lend of mine.”
from An Open Letter
Against my will I did my first group FaceTime call to resolve some of the tension around a situation I’ve been hearing about essentially through proxy. thankfully it didn’t go that bad, but it was a bit of an uncomfortable situation to essentially have to mediate and suggest boundaries between two friends that got crushes on each other when it is not appropriate. One of them is in a long-term committed relationship, and the other is just getting out of a long term codependent relationship. I’m happy with how I handled it though, and also to their credit they handled it pretty well.
from Interior Painting Schaumburg IL for Beautiful Homes
Der Verlust eines geliebten Menschen ist eine schwere Zeit. Ein Grabmal ist deshalb mehr als nur ein Stein. Es ist ein Ort der Erinnerung, der Liebe und des Respekts.
Bei der Auswahl von Grabmale Berlin suchen viele Familien nach Qualität, Haltbarkeit und einem individuellen Design. Ein sorgfältig gestaltetes Grabmal hilft dabei, die Erinnerung an Verstorbene auf würdevolle Weise zu bewahren.
In Berlin gibt es viele Möglichkeiten, ein passendes Grabmal zu finden. Dennoch ist es wichtig, einen erfahrenen Anbieter zu wählen. Denn nur hochwertige Materialien und präzise Handwerkskunst sorgen für langlebige Ergebnisse.
Ein Grabmal steht oft über viele Jahrzehnte auf einem Friedhof. Deshalb muss es verschiedenen Wetterbedingungen standhalten. Regen, Frost und starke Sonneneinstrahlung können minderwertige Materialien schnell beschädigen.
Hochwertiger Granit, Marmor oder Naturstein bieten hier klare Vorteile. Diese Materialien sind robust und gleichzeitig optisch ansprechend. Daher entscheiden sich viele Familien für Naturstein.
Außerdem trägt ein gut verarbeitetes Grabmal zur gepflegten Optik der Grabstätte bei. Es schafft einen würdevollen Ort für Besuche und stille Momente.
Jeder Mensch ist einzigartig. Daher sollte auch das Grabmal die Persönlichkeit des Verstorbenen widerspiegeln.
Viele Menschen wählen individuelle Gravuren, Symbole oder besondere Formen. Namen, Daten und persönliche Botschaften machen jedes Grabmal einzigartig. Zusätzlich können religiöse Symbole oder florale Motive integriert werden.
Dadurch entsteht ein Denkmal, das persönliche Geschichten erzählt.
Die Auswahl an Grabmalen ist groß. Deshalb lohnt es sich, die verschiedenen Optionen zu kennen.
Einzelgrabmale sind für eine einzelne Ruhestätte gedacht. Sie gehören zu den häufigsten Varianten in Berlin.
Diese Grabsteine können schlicht oder aufwendig gestaltet sein. Die Wahl hängt vom persönlichen Geschmack und den Friedhofsvorgaben ab.
Doppelgrabmale eignen sich für Familien- oder Partnergräber. Sie bieten mehr Platz für Inschriften und Dekorationen.
Außerdem wirken sie oft besonders harmonisch und repräsentativ.
Urnengrabmale sind meist kompakter. Dennoch bieten sie viele Gestaltungsmöglichkeiten.
Sie sind ideal für kleinere Grabflächen und moderne Bestattungsformen.
Die Materialwahl beeinflusst Optik, Haltbarkeit und Pflegeaufwand.
Granit ist besonders beliebt, weil er robust und pflegeleicht ist. Außerdem bleibt seine Oberfläche über viele Jahre schön.
Marmor wirkt elegant und edel. Allerdings benötigt er mehr Pflege, da er empfindlicher gegenüber Umwelteinflüssen ist.
Sandstein bietet eine natürliche, warme Optik. Jedoch ist er weniger widerstandsfähig als Granit.
Daher lohnt sich eine professionelle Beratung vor dem Kauf.
Beim Kauf eines Grabmals spielen mehrere Faktoren eine Rolle.
Zuerst sollten Sie die Friedhofsvorschriften prüfen. Viele Friedhöfe in Berlin haben feste Regeln für Größe, Material und Gestaltung.
Außerdem sollten Qualität und Verarbeitung sorgfältig geprüft werden. Saubere Gravuren und präzise Kanten sind wichtige Merkmale guter Handwerksarbeit.
Auch der Service des Anbieters ist entscheidend. Beratung, Planung und Montage sollten zuverlässig durchgeführt werden.
Wenn es um hochwertige Grabmale geht, überzeugt mjgranit durch Erfahrung, Präzision und Liebe zum Detail. Das Unternehmen verbindet traditionelle Steinmetzkunst mit moderner Gestaltung.
Mit hochwertigen Natursteinen, individueller Beratung und maßgeschneiderten Designs schafft mjgranit Grabmale, die Würde, Beständigkeit und persönliche Erinnerung perfekt vereinen.
Die Auswahl eines Grabmals sollte niemals überstürzt erfolgen. Nehmen Sie sich Zeit, verschiedene Designs und Materialien zu vergleichen.
Ein professioneller Anbieter hilft Ihnen dabei, die richtige Entscheidung zu treffen. Dadurch vermeiden Sie spätere Unzufriedenheit.
Außerdem kann eine gute Beratung helfen, das Budget sinnvoll einzusetzen, ohne Kompromisse bei der Qualität einzugehen.
Die Wahl des richtigen Grabmals ist eine wichtige Entscheidung. Ein hochwertiges Denkmal bewahrt Erinnerungen und schafft einen Ort der Verbundenheit.
Wer nach Grabmale Berlin sucht, sollte auf Qualität, Material und individuelle Gestaltung achten. Mit dem richtigen Partner entsteht ein Grabmal, das Respekt, Liebe und Erinnerung über viele Jahre hinweg sichtbar macht.
from DrFox

from Hiroaki Satou
The Illinois college students who once dissolved before becoming anyone have returned in 2026 — each living an ordinary life — to quietly step beyond the vessel of rock.
In 1999, in a corner of a college campus in Illinois, an album was quietly recorded. The budget was a mere two thousand dollars; the sessions lasted just four days. By the time recording began, the band had already entered dissolution mode — members were graduating, and the end was imminent. In the three years leading up to those studio sessions, they had played somewhere between fifteen and thirty live shows, most of them to a handful of people in half-empty rooms.
“Nobody cared about this band.”
As member Steve Holmes later recalled, their debut album — known colloquially as LP1 — was destined to be filed away in a drawer as a memento of youth, reaching no one, disappearing quietly alongside the close of their college years. What the underground scene of the time wanted was emo as punk: louder, more impulsive, more viscerally emotional.
[What is emo?] Short for “emotional hardcore,” emo emerged in the late 1980s as a branch of American hardcore punk. It retained the intensity of its parent genre while turning inward — breakups, loneliness, and identity crisis delivered with raw personal candor. By the 1990s, pop-inflected acts like Blink-182 and The Get Up Kids dominated the mainstream, but in the Chicago suburbs of Illinois — where American Football, Owen, and Cap'n Jazz all took shape — a subgenre called Midwest emo developed its own distinct character: complex guitar arpeggios, odd time signatures, an intellectual and introspective sensibility. The 2010s saw a global-scale reappraisal of these bands, widely referred to as the “emo revival” or the genre's third wave. American Football's sound — understated, quiet, labyrinthine — was entirely out of step with the spirit of its time.
Yet in the fourteen years of the band's absence, something strange happened in reverse. Through file-sharing software like LimeWire and early internet message boards, that green-house cover quietly became a cult scripture among serious music listeners, eventually circling back as a foundational “source text” for the emo revival bands of the 2010s.
When a reissue in 2014 prompted a reunion, what awaited them was a string of sold-out stages around the world. Nate Kinsella — cousin of Mike Kinsella — joined as bassist at this point, expanding the band from a trio to a quartet. The group that had dissolved in total obscurity returned to find itself a legend the world had been waiting for.
What makes this band truly singular is that even after their miraculous reunion, they never returned to being full-time musicians.
Member Steve Lamos teaches as an associate professor of writing and rhetoric at the University of Colorado Boulder; Holmes works for a software company; frontman Mike Kinsella raises children while maintaining his solo project Owen. They can manage twenty to thirty live shows a year at most — grounded, practical people leading grounded, practical lives, running American Football as a full-fledged side project.
That sense of astonishment you felt listening to LP2 — how could something with this level of completeness have been made on the side? — is, from a structural standpoint, a perfectly logical outcome.
Kinsella has spoken of the “many compromises” involved in writing lyrics in the margins of work and parenting, scrawled out on tour buses under punishing schedules. But it is precisely because they have no need for the hungry ego or commercial calculation that comes with making a living from music that they are able to maintain — alongside the rhythms of daily life — a grownup's stoicism in controlling studio reverb and sound pressure down to the millimeter. The alternate tunings and polyrhythms they played in college, filtered through seventeen years of lived experience, had been refined into a species of fully controlled, quietly obsessive craftsmanship.
It should be noted that Lamos left the band in 2021 before returning in 2023, and has been involved in the making of LP4.
And then, in 2026, LP4 arrived — their first new record in seven years — more beautiful than anything they had made before, and further from their earlier sound than they had ever ventured.
The first thing that strikes the ear is the dramatic shift in sonic texture. The fresh, vivid indie-rock feel that once rang out from a campus corner has stepped back; in its place, a rich and deep acoustic space spreads outward, edging toward modern classical, electronica, post-rock, and ambient drone. The band has aged as people, and the musical vocabulary absorbed along the way has matured correspondingly — that much seems clear from the boldness of this expansion.
Thematically, too, LP4 carries a weight incomparable to anything before it. Polyvinyl has described the album as “relentlessly heavy,” noting that subjects like suicide, shame, divorce, addiction, self-loathing, and recovery often coexist within a single song. The lyricism of LP1, which charted the tremors of youth, has deepened into the raw, unfiltered reality of middle age.
Yet peel back that new acoustic fog one layer, and at the structural core of these songs — holding everything up — you will find the same “obsessively repeated arpeggios in alternate tunings, woven between two guitars” as always.
The roots of their music lie not in the impulse of punk but in a minimalism directly descended from Steve Reich: short phrases repeated, emotional contour drawn from subtle phase shifts and harmonic variations. That equation has not wavered, regardless of how much the surrounding texture has changed. One clear expression of this is LP4's “Desdemona,” built around a sustained rhythmic pulse drawn from Reich's landmark Music for 18 Musicians (1978) — the band's long-declared admiration for Reich finally inscribed into the skeleton of the music itself. For listeners who fell in love with the indie-rock energy of earlier records, this fog-laden sound may feel like a departure into too-distant territory. But for the band, it may represent a liberation from the monument they erected with their first album.
Those small, darting guitar arpeggios — once the vessel for the pain and unsteadiness of youth — now resound in 2026 like a loop that says: daily life goes on, quietly, but without question.
The fact that American Football's influence is inscribed not in critical endorsement alone, but in the actual actions of both contemporary and younger musicians, speaks to the essential strength of their music.
The most striking evidence of this is the 25th-anniversary tribute album for LP1, released in 2024. Featuring contributions from Iron & Wine, Manchester Orchestra, Blondshell, and others, the release drew particular attention for Ethel Cain's cover of “For Sure.” One of the most representative artists in the current alternative scene, Ethel Cain reached out and volunteered to cover the track herself, expanding the original's three minutes and sixteen seconds into a piece approaching ten minutes. “It's the song that always stands out to me when I put on the record,” she said, “and I immediately knew how to translate it into my own sound.” She added that “American Football is a band that etched themselves so deeply into an era with their debut — their musical storytelling has continued to inspire me in countless ways,” and the depth of her devotion is evident even in the music video for her own song “American Teenager,” whose typography and layout consciously echoes the cover design of LP1.
On LP4, the roster of collaborators reads as a map of the band's reach. Brendan Yates of Turnstile — a band at the front lines of the hardcore scene — was invited to join “No Feeling” as one voice in a choral ensemble, but when he tried an impromptu high-register harmony in the studio, his vocal presence lifted the song into an entirely different dimension. Kinsella recalled the moment as “everyone in the studio's jaw dropping.” That two artists from apparently separate contexts — emo and hardcore — could generate this kind of natural chemistry is itself proof that American Football operates beyond the boundaries of any particular genre.
The collaboration with Paramore's Hayley Williams on LP3 (2019) is legible in the same terms. Williams — who operates at the mainstream of pop-rock — agreed to appear on “Uncomfortably Numb” because she had simply been a longtime fan of American Football. And on LP4, Caithlin De Marrais of Rainer Maria — a peer from the same 1990s emo scene — also appears. Artists from different generations, each drawn to this band for their own reasons: that fact alone testifies to the rare and powerful magnetic field that is American Football.
3rd album is as good as others
Why does American Football's music lodge itself so deeply even in listeners who do not ordinarily listen to emo? Not because they are a band that detonates emotion.
There is something here that connects to the sadcore atmosphere of Red House Painters and Sun Kiel Moon — a raw authenticity that seals heavy feeling inside stillness. The slowly unspooling arpeggios they share with slowcore may be part of it. But the deeper reason is that this emotional truth is designed with cold precision through a minimalist “structure” that could almost be called mathematical.
A project that should have died completely is deified through the underground waterways of the modern internet, then breathed back to life in the margins of the adult lives its members now lead. What the 2026 record proves — quietly, and overwhelmingly — is that as the landscape of their lives has shifted, they have kept weaving, at the tips of their fingers, the same “aesthetics of repetition” they have carried since 1999, unchanged.
from Hiroaki Satou
Reading the roles of Thom Yorke and Jonny Greenwood through Christopher O'Riley's transcriptions, and tracing the single thread that leads to their present-day solo work
In 2003, a strange wave of inquiries flooded NPR radio program From the Top. During a broadcast, listeners so moved by a piece the host-pianist had performed began writing in to ask: “Where can I find the beautiful music of this composer, 'Mr. Head'?”
“Mr. Head,” of course, was Radiohead.
The program's host, Christopher O'Riley, had been playing his own piano-solo arrangements of Radiohead songs — entirely unannounced, as if they were standard classical repertoire — in the same time slots he might otherwise fill with Debussy or Rachmaninoff miniatures. Classical listeners had assumed they were hearing music in the lineage of Bach or Debussy.
This “misidentification” is more than a charming anecdote. It stands as the most eloquent possible proof of the structural depth within Radiohead's music.
Christopher O'Riley is by no means an unknown amateur. He is a concert pianist who won prizes at all four of the world's premier competitions — Van Cliburn, Leeds, Busoni, and Montreal — and has performed with major orchestras including the New York Philharmonic, Los Angeles Philharmonic, and Philadelphia Orchestra. He began piano at age four, studied with Russell Sherman at the New England Conservatory, and has spent his career performing works of formidable technical demand: Prokofiev, Ravel, Shostakovich. That such a figure would turn his attention to Radiohead covers is itself remarkable.
O'Riley first encountered Radiohead in 1997, the year OK Computer was released. Stopped in his tracks by what he heard on the radio, he went on to devour not only official recordings but live bootlegs, B-sides, and unreleased material, eventually beginning to transcribe the music himself.
Consider for a moment what this actually entails. Radiohead is a five-piece band: Thom Yorke on vocals and guitar; Jonny Greenwood on guitar, ondes Martenot, string arrangements, and electronic processing; Ed O'Brien on effects guitar; Colin Greenwood on bass; Phil Selway on drums. From OK Computer onward, this is further layered with Mellotron, electronic sound processing, and sampling — in effect, a fusion of rock band, electronic music, and chamber ensemble operating in multiple simultaneous strata.
O'Riley compresses all of this into a piano solo. Two hands. One sustain pedal.
He has spoken frankly about the difficulty: “My Radiohead transcriptions are among the most difficult things in my repertoire — including Prokofiev's Piano Concerto No. 2.” He cited a particular two-bar passage in “There There”: “It's roughly equivalent to the hardest moment in the Prokofiev concerto. It just happens forty times in a row.”
So what, concretely, is O'Riley doing?
First, there is voice redistribution. In Radiohead's music, vocal melody, guitar countermelody, and bassline run simultaneously as independent voices. O'Riley redistributes these across the full range of the piano: the vocal line sings in the upper register of the right hand, while the left hand supports bass and rhythm, and the middle register weaves in the guitar's countermelody. The voice-separation techniques used in playing Bach inventions and fugues find direct application here.
Then there is the translation of electronic texture. The floating quality of Jonny Greenwood's ondes Martenot; the “fog” created by Ed O'Brien's delay pedal; the inhuman quality of Yorke's electronically processed vocals — none of these seem reproducible on a purely physical instrument like the piano. O'Riley creates resonance and tonal blending through meticulous sustain pedal control, and approximates the electronic “roughness” by strategically placing dissonant harmonies. Critics have described this technique as “a translation deploying Ravel's harmonic sensibility and Shostakovich's use of dissonance.”
Finally, there is rhythmic reconstruction. The polyrhythms and syncopations of Phil Selway's drumming are transplanted to the left hand — but a mere transplant would be flat. Through what critics have called a “rhythmically unstable left hand,” O'Riley conveys the groove of the drums through variations in touch and subtle fluctuations of tempo.
He has described what draws him to Radiohead's music this way:
“Not one member of Radiohead may be able to read music. But each of them brings a thread of a particular idea or motive to a song. It's very similar to the interplay of multiple voices in a Bach fugue or a Shostakovich fugue.”
This perception is precisely what separates his arrangements from mere covers. Rather than simply “reducing” five players' worth of sound, he preserves the essential contrapuntal structure and rebuilds it across eighty-eight keys. It is an act of deconstruction and reassembly — work that only becomes visible through classical training.
O'Riley also knew that not every song could be translated. When he told Yorke, “I can't imagine playing 'Pyramid Song' on piano unless you're singing it,” that was a judgment: without Yorke's vocal as a voice, the heart of the piece disappears. Deciding which songs to choose and which to leave alone was itself part of O'Riley's art as an arranger.
True Love Waits: Christopher O'Riley Plays Radiohead, released in 2003, earned four stars from Rolling Stone — a rating that, by all accounts, had effectively never before been awarded to a classical recording by that publication.
In the period around the album's release, O'Riley had the opportunity to speak directly with Thom Yorke. The record of that conversation illuminates both the nature of Radiohead's music and Yorke himself.
As O'Riley was preparing the cover album, mutual acquaintances warned him: “Don't be surprised if they hear your versions and say, 'Why would you bother covering us?'”
What O'Riley actually found when he met Yorke was a figure completely unlike his expectations.
When O'Riley mentioned, “I'm arranging a 1997 version of 'Lift' — I prefer the older version,” Yorke replied without hesitation: “Good. The new version is shit.” This unsparing self-criticism was entirely characteristic.
When O'Riley said he couldn't imagine playing “Pyramid Song” without Yorke singing it, Yorke shot back immediately: “Meaning it's only good if I ruin it?”
When O'Riley observed, “On its own, 'How to Disappear Completely' might just be guitar and vocals — ordinary, even. But the cloud of quarter-tone strings Jonny layered over it is what makes it unique,” Yorke fell quiet and smiled — barely, but unmistakably. It was the expression of someone who had just heard articulated something he himself had never put into words.
O'Riley later reflected: “He was an extraordinarily humble, self-deprecating person. We just spent the time talking about his wonderful music.”
O'Riley subsequently met the full band in Amsterdam, in a considerably more relaxed atmosphere. A kind of mutual respect had formed between the group working collectively and the pianist who engaged with their songs alone.
What this encounter reveals is that Yorke values his own music less than anyone else — not out of false modesty, but from the insatiable dissatisfaction with one's own work that perfectionism inevitably produces. The same impulse that drove him to push the rest of the band through the ordeal of Kid A in pursuit of a new direction.
The multi-voiced structure that O'Riley identified in Radiohead was not confined to OK Computer and the experimental work that followed. It was already present, in embryonic form, with The Bends.
The Bends was released in March 1995 and reached number four on the UK Albums Chart. Five singles were released from it: “High and Dry” peaked at UK number 17, “Fake Plastic Trees” at 20, “Just” at 19, and the final single “Street Spirit (Fade Out)” at number 5. “Street Spirit” outperformed the previous benchmark of “Creep,” demonstrating that Radiohead were no one-hit wonder. The album ultimately went four-times platinum in the UK and platinum in the US.
More significant than the chart numbers is the fact that The Bends established Radiohead's compositional mode as a band. On Pablo Honey, nearly every song had been written by Yorke alone; on The Bends, each member's voice began for the first time to act autonomously. The guitar part of “Just” was constructed by Jonny Greenwood deploying an octatonic scale across four octaves, with the solo pitch-shifted into the upper register via a DigiTech Whammy pedal — an entirely original approach. “(Nice Dream)” began with Yorke's simple four-chord skeleton, which O'Brien and Greenwood then fleshed out by adding their own parts. “Fake Plastic Trees” was completed by a reversed process: producer John Leckie recorded a solo take of Yorke playing acoustic guitar, and the band then built up sound over it. “Black Star” was recorded on a day when Leckie was absent, with an engineer then still relatively new to the band — Nigel Godrich — sitting at the controls. That session marked the beginning of a lifelong partnership: Godrich would go on to produce every subsequent Radiohead record.
This diversification of creative roles gave each song independent voices of its own. In the Britain of 1995, dominated by Britpop at its peak, The Bends pointed in an entirely different direction from the nostalgic rock of Oasis. Pitchfork would later describe the Yorke–Jonny Greenwood songwriting partnership of this period as “comparable to Lennon–McCartney or Jagger–Richards.” Garbage and R.E.M. began naming Radiohead as a favourite band; The Cure contacted them to ask about the sonic approach of the album, hoping to apply it to their own work.
That O'Riley actively covered The Bends material is consistent with this reading. The track listing of True Love Waits (2003) includes five songs from the album: “Fake Plastic Trees,” “Bulletproof... I Wish I Was,” “Black Star,” “Thinking About You,” and “You.” Choosing The Bends songs alongside the experimental material from OK Computer onward says something important about O'Riley's curatorial eye: in his view, Radiohead's musical depth did not spring into existence with OK Computer. The multi-voiced structure of The Bends already warranted translation to the piano in its own right.
AllMusic's critic wrote of O'Riley's covers of The Bends material: “Darker, quieter numbers like 'Bulletproof' and 'Motion Picture Soundtrack' translate particularly well to the piano.” The introspective stillness of those songs and their interlocking voices have a natural affinity with the instrument — which is itself evidence that, even at this stage, Radiohead was already writing music that did not depend solely on “the sound of a rock band.”
What, precisely, does O'Riley mean when he speaks of a “Bach-like structure”?
The essence of a Bach fugue is that multiple independent voices move simultaneously while organically interweaving. Each voice functions not as accompaniment but as an equal participant bearing its own subject. Radiohead's five members likewise each carried an irreplaceable “voice.”
Thom Yorke is the primary source of the songs' skeletal framework, lyrics, and melody. He writes the bones of a song at the piano and brings it to the band. His vocal functions as an independent melodic voice that contends with the instrumental ensemble on equal terms.
Jonny Greenwood is the figure who brought the sensibility of contemporary classical music into the band: guitar textures, string arrangements, ondes Martenot, electronic processing — he designed what might be called “the acoustic space around the song.” When O'Riley observed that “it's the cloud of quarter-tone strings Jonny layered over 'How to Disappear Completely' that makes it unique,” and Yorke responded with a faint smile, the significance of that voice was something Yorke understood better than anyone.
Ed O'Brien creates “fog” and “space” in the sound through effects and guitar texture. A single choice of delay pedal setting can transform the entire acoustic environment of a track.
Colin Greenwood's basslines function not as simple low-end support but as an independent melodic voice with its own movement. The bass on Kid A's “Dollars and Cents” originated as improvisation he played while listening to Alice Coltrane records.
Phil Selway's drumming carries a jazz-inflected flexibility; rather than merely marking time, it engages in dialogue with the other voices.
Crucially, this “fugal structure” was never a deliberate design. Most band members cannot read music. Yet the musical intuitions and experiences each brought to the table accidentally produced something closely approximating what Bach constructed as formal theory: counterpoint arrived at unconsciously.
That said, none of this was yet in place on Pablo Honey (1993), where Yorke wrote the songs and the band performed them — straightforward alternative rock under the influence of Pixies and Dinosaur Jr. The autonomous voices began to emerge on The Bends (1995) and fully flowered on OK Computer.
After the The Bends tour, Radiohead spent long stretches on the tour bus listening to Miles Davis's Bitches Brew (1970). Jonny recalled:
“In a sense we were arrogant. We'd listen to a record like Bitches Brew and want to do that — even though none of us owned a trumpet or had any desire to play one. There was an arrogance in thinking, 'Oh, we can do something like that.'”
Yorke explicitly named Bitches Brew's “unbelievably dense and terrifying sound” as the starting point for OK Computer. He also cited Ennio Morricone, the krautrock band Can, and DJ Shadow's sampling techniques as influences.
At this stage, the electronica influence is still germinal. The opening of “Airbag” had Phil Selway's drums recorded for sixteen minutes, then a few-second loop extracted and processed on a Macintosh to form the rhythmic core. The second half of “Karma Police” was rebuilt by Yorke and Godrich alone using samples and loops — a dry run for Kid A.
But OK Computer is fundamentally still collective work. Influences were shared; everyone was aligned on the direction.
After the global success of OK Computer, Yorke experienced a strange sense of loss. The emergence of Travis, Coldplay, and other bands imitating his sound provoked a visceral reaction; he stopped listening to rock entirely.
Walking the cliffs of Cornwall, what he listened to obsessively was Warp Records: Aphex Twin, Autechre, Boards of Canada. He would later describe Aphex Twin as having “opened another world to me — one that didn't need my electric guitar.”
The new material Yorke brought to sessions was incomplete: driven by sound and rhythm, often lacking lyrics or conventional structure. Jonny feared it would become “art for art's sake rock.” Colin couldn't warm to its coldness. Even producer Godrich was disoriented; other members seriously considered leaving. Yorke has acknowledged this directly:
“The other members couldn't figure out what to contribute. When you're working on synthesizers, you lose the sense of being in the same room as other people. I made it nearly impossible for everyone.”
Yet even here, the “accidental fugue” found a way to function. “Idioteque” began when Jonny handed Yorke a fifty-minute improvisation on modular synthesizer; Yorke found a forty-second fragment he felt was “absolute genius” and built the entire song around it. It was a moment where Yorke's electronic impulse and Jonny's acoustic design merged.
Kid A is the record made while the band was on the verge of collapse. And that experience prepared the ground for what came next.
After the Hail to the Thief (2003) tour, Radiohead entered a period of hiatus. During that time, Yorke sat alone with a laptop and began making music — music that became the 2006 solo album The Eraser.
This was not a rejection of Radiohead. Jonny said: “He needed to put this out. Everyone was glad he did.” Yorke himself repeatedly emphasised at the time of release: “I'd always wanted to do something like this. It came together easily and quickly. Radiohead is not breaking up.”
Most of the songs on The Eraser were pieces that had “not fit” within Radiohead — personal fragments of electronic music written in hotel rooms and on planes, material that couldn't be contained within the band's frame. The experience of pushing the rest of the band to their limits during Kid A had led to a simple resolution: the next electronic impulse would be followed alone, without bringing the band along.
Yorke went on to form the electronic band Atoms for Peace, and more recently launched The Smile with Jonny Greenwood. The Smile has been described as a freer and wilder project drawing more heavily on jazz, krautrock, and progressive rock.
A single line comes into focus.
Just as American Football's arpeggios, born on a midwestern night, drew inspiration from Steve Reich's minimalism. Just as O'Riley found Bach's fugues in Radiohead's music. Just as Yorke heard in Bitches Brew “something that accumulates while falling apart.”
Perhaps the depth of music lies in this: the same structural principle repeating across different eras, cultures, and forms, undeterred by the boundaries of genre. What O'Riley's piano demonstrated is the fact that Radiohead occupied a place beyond the frame of “rock band.”
from Hiroaki Satou
かつて何者にもなれずに解散したイリノイの大学生たちは、2026年、それぞれの「生活」の傍らで、ロックという器を静かに踏み越えた。
1999年、アメリカ・イリノイ州の大学キャンパスの片隅で、ひとつのアルバムがひっそりと録音された。予算はわずか2000ドル、期間はたったの4日間。メンバーの卒業に伴い、バンドはアルバムのリリースを待たずしてすでに解散モードに入っていた。スタジオに入るまでの3年間で行ったライブはわずか15本から30本。それも観客が数人の、閑散としたものだった。
「誰もこのバンドを気にしていなかった」
後にメンバーのSteve Holmesが振り返った通り、彼らの1stアルバム(通称『LP1』)は、誰に届くこともなく、青春の終わりとともに引き出しの奥へ片付けられた「思い出の品」になるはずだった。当時のアンダーグラウンド・シーンが求めていたのは、もっと激しく、衝動的に感情を叫ぶパンクとしての「エモ」だったからだ。
【エモとは】 “Emotional hardcore”を略した呼称で、1980年代後半にアメリカのハードコア・パンクから分岐して生まれたロックの一ジャンル。激しいサウンドを保ちながら、失恋・孤独・アイデンティティの揺らぎといった個人の内面を赤裸々に歌うことを特徴とする。90年代にはBlinkやGetup Kidsのようなポップ寄りのバンドが主流を形成する一方、American FootballやOwens、Cap'n Jazzが生まれたイリノイ州シカゴ近郊では「ミッドウェスト・エモ」と呼ばれるサブジャンルが育ち、複雑なギター・アルペジオや変拍子を取り入れた知的・内省的な様式を展開した。2010年代には当時のバンドが再評価され「エモ・リバイバル」と呼ばれる第三波が世界規模で起きている。地味で、静かで、複雑な彼らの音楽は、時代の空気感と完全に齟齬をきたしていた。
しかし、バンドが不在の14年間に、奇妙な逆流現象が起きる。ファイル共有ソフトLimewireやインターネットのメッセージボードを通じて、あの「緑の家」のジャケットは音楽マニアの間でカルト的な聖典として語り継がれ、2010年代のエモ・リバイバル世代のバンドたちによって「源流」として逆輸入されたのだ。
2014年、リイシュー盤の発売を機に再結成が実現したとき、彼らを待っていたのは世界中のソールドアウトのステージだった。このとき、Mike KinsellaのいとこであるNate Kinsellaがベーシストとして加入し、バンドはトリオからカルテットへと生まれ変わる。解散したときは誰にも知られていなかった彼らは、再結成したときには世界から求められる伝説になっていた。
このバンドの特異性は、奇跡的な再結成を遂げた後も、彼らが決して「専業ミュージシャン」に戻らなかったことにある。
メンバーのSteve Lamosはコロラド大学ボルダー校でライティング・レトリック学の准教授として教壇に立ち、Holmesはソフトウェア会社に勤め、フロントマンのMike Kinsellaは子育てをしながら自身のソロプロジェクト「Owen」を営む。彼らは年間20〜30本のライブが限界の、堅実な「生活者」であり、完全なる「副業」としてAmerican Footballを運営している。
あなたがLP2を聴いたときに覚えた「副業で作ったとは思えない完成度」への驚愕。それは、音楽構造的に正しい必然が生んだものだ。
Kinsellaは後に、仕事や子育ての合間、ツアーバスの中で歌詞を書き殴るような過酷なスケジュールの中で「多くの妥協があった」と語っている。しかし、音楽で飯を食うためのギラギラしたエゴや商業的打算が必要ないからこそ、彼らは日常の傍らで、スタジオの残響や音圧を1ミリ単位でコントロールする「大人のストイシズム」を貫くことができた。かつて大学時代に鳴らしていた変則チューニングやポリリズムは、17年間の人生経験を経て、完全にコントロールされた狂気的な職人技へと昇華されていたのだ。
なお、Lamosは2021年に一度バンドを離れているが、2023年に復帰。LP4の制作にも加わっている。
そして2026年、7年ぶりの新作として送り出したLP4は、これまでのどの作品よりも美しく、そして彼らの過去のサウンドからは最も遠い場所へと到達している。
一聴して耳を引くのは、そのドラスティックな音響の変化だ。かつてキャンパスの片隅で鳴っていた瑞々しいインディー・ロックのテクスチャーは一歩後退し、そこにはモダン・クラシカルやエレクトロニカ、さらにはポストロックやアンビエント・ドローンに近い、豊潤で深い音響空間が広がっている。生活者としての年齢を重ね、インプットされる音楽的語彙がさらに成熟したことが、この大胆な拡張を生んだのだろう。
テーマの面でも、LP4は過去作とは比べものにならない重さを持つ。Polyvinylはこのアルバムを「容赦なく重い」と評し、自殺、羞恥、離婚、依存症、自己嫌悪、そして再生といった主題が、しばしば1曲の中に同居すると説明している。青春の揺らぎを描いたLP1の叙情性は、中年の生々しいリアルへと深化している。
しかし、この新しい音響の霧を1枚めくったその中心で、楽曲を構造的に支えているのは、やはりあの「2本のギターが織りなす、執拗に繰り返される変則チューニングのアルペジオ」だ。
彼らの音楽のルーツには、パンクの衝動ではなく、スティーヴ・ライヒ直系のミニマリズムがある。短いフレーズを反復し、わずかな位相のズレや和声の変化で感情の起伏を描くという方程式は、周囲の環境(テクスチャー)がどれほど変わろうとも、一切揺らいでいない。その結実のひとつが、LP4収録の「Desdemona」だ。この曲はライヒの代表作『Music for 18 Musicians』(1978年)に着想を得た持続的なリズム・パルスを軸に構築されており、バンドが長年口にしてきたライヒへの傾倒が、ついに楽曲の骨格に刻み込まれた形となっている。インディー・ロックの衝動を愛したリスナーにとっては、この霧深い音響はあまりにも遠くへ行きすぎたように映るかもしれない。しかし彼らにとっては最初のアルバムの打ち立てた金字塔からの開放であるのかもしれない。
かつて青春の揺らぎや痛みを表現していたあの小刻みなギターのアルペジオは、2026年の今、まるで「淡々と、しかし確実に続いていく日常の営み」そのものを象徴するループのように響く。
American Footballの影響力が単なる「評論家のお墨付き」ではなく、同時代および次世代のミュージシャンたちの実際の行動に刻まれているという事実は、彼らの音楽の本質的な強さを物語っている。
その最も顕著な証左が、2024年に発表されたLP1の25周年記念カバーアルバムだ。Iron & Wine、Manchester Orchestra、Blondshellなど多彩なアーティストが参加したこの企画で、とりわけ注目を集めたのがEthel Cainによる「For Sure」のカバーだった。現在のオルタナティヴ・シーンを代表するアーティストの一人であるEthel Cainは、自らこの曲を選んでカバーを申し出、原曲の3分16秒を約10分の楽曲へと昇華させた。「私がレコードをかけるたびにいつも際立って聴こえる曲で、自分のサウンドにどう翻訳するかはすぐにわかった」と彼女は語っている。また「American Footballは、デビュー盤でひとつの時代にこれほど深く刻み込まれたバンドだ。その音楽的ストーリーテリングは、数えきれないほどの方法で私にインスピレーションを与え続けてきた」とも述べており、彼女の傾倒が表面的なものでないことは、楽曲「American Teenager」のMVがLP1のジャケットのフォント・レイアウトを意識的に模倣していることからも伝わってくる。
LP4においても、コラボレーションの顔ぶれがそのままバンドの影響力の地図となっている。ハードコア・シーンの最前線に立つTurnstileのBrendan Yatesが参加した「No Feeling」は、もともとコーラスの合唱パートの一員として招かれたものだったが、スタジオで即興的に高音ハーモニーを試みたところ、その声の個性が楽曲を別次元へと引き上げた。Kinsellaはその瞬間を「スタジオ全員の顎が落ちた」と振り返っている。エモとハードコアという一見異なる文脈に立つ二者が、こうして自然な化学反応を起こすこと自体、American Footballが特定のジャンルの枠を超えて機能していることの証明だろう。
LP3(2019年)でのParamoreのHayley Williamsとのコラボレーションも同様の文脈で理解できる。ポップ・ロックのメインストリームで活躍するWilliamsが「Uncomfortably Numb」への参加を承諾したのは、彼女がAmerican Footballの長年のファンだったからに他ならない。さらにLP4では、90年代のエモ・シーンで活動をともにした同時代人Rainer MariaのCaithlin De Marraisも名を連ねる。世代の異なるアーティストたちが、それぞれの理由でこのバンドに引き寄せられてくる—その事実そのものが、American Footballというバンドの稀有な磁場の強さを示している。
3rd album is as good as others
American Footballの音楽が、普段エモを聴かないリスナーの耳にすらこれほど深く刺さる理由。それは、彼らが感情を爆発させるバンドだからではない。
Red House PaintersやSun Kill Moonが持つ「静けさの中に重い感情を封じ込める」あのサッドコアの情景にも通じる、剥き出しの真正性。スロウコアとの共通のゆっくりと奏でられるアルペジオがそう感じさせるのかもしれない。それを、数学的とも言えるミニマリズムの「構造」によって冷徹に設計しているからだ。
一度は完璧に死んだはずのプロジェクトが、SNSという現代の地下水脈を通じて神格化され、大人になった彼らの「生活の余白」で再び息を吹き返す。2026年の最新作が証明しているのは、彼らが人生の景色を変えながらも、あの1999年から何も変わらない「反復の美学」を指先で編み続けているという、静かな、しかし圧倒的な事実なのだ。
from Hiroaki Satou
Christopher O'Rileyのトランスクリプションから読み解く、Thom YorkeとJonny Greenwoodの役割分担、そして現在のソロ活動へと続く一本の道筋
2003年、アメリカのNPRラジオ番組「From the Top」に奇妙な問い合わせが殺到した。番組の途中、ホストのピアニストが演奏した曲に感銘を受けたリスナーたちが、「この”Mr. Head”という作曲家の美しい音楽はどこで入手できますか」と尋ねてきたのだ。
「Mr. Head」とは、もちろんRadioheadのことだった。
番組ホストのChristopher O'Rileyは、DebussyやRachmaninoffの小品を弾く時間枠に、Radioheadの曲をピアノ独奏にアレンジしたものをクラシック曲のように無告知で演奏していた。クラシック音楽の聴衆は、それをバッハやドビュッシーの系譜に連なる音楽だと思って聴いていたのだ。
この「誤認」は、単なる面白いエピソードではない。Radioheadの音楽が持つ構造的な深さを、これ以上なく雄弁に証明している。
Christopher O'Rileyは、けっして無名のアマチュアではない。Van Cliburn、Leeds、Busoni、モントリオールという国際ピアノコンクールの最高峰すべてで受賞し、ニューヨーク・フィル、ロサンゼルス・フィル、フィラデルフィア管弦楽団など主要オーケストラと共演を重ねたコンサートピアニストだ。4歳からピアノを始め、ニューイングランド音楽院でRussell Shermanに師事した。プロコフィエフ、ラヴェル、ショスタコーヴィチという高度な技巧を要する作品を演奏し続けてきた人物が、Radioheadのカバーに向かったのだ。
彼がRadioheadを知ったのは1997年、OK Computer発売の年だった。ラジオで偶然耳にしたその音楽に打ちのめされたO'Rileyは、以来Radioheadの公式音源だけでなく、ライブブートレグ、B面曲、未発表音源まで聴き尽くし、みずから採譜を始めた。
ここで立ち止まって考えてほしい。Radioheadは5人組のバンドだ。Thom Yorkeのボーカルとギター、Jonny Greenwoodのギター・オンドマルトノ・弦楽アレンジ・電子処理、Ed O'Brienのエフェクトギター、Colin Greenwoodのベース、Phil Selwayのドラム。しかもOK Computer以降は、これらに加えてMellotron、電子音響処理、サンプリングが加わる。事実上、ロックバンドと電子音楽と室内楽が融合した多層構造だ。
O'Rileyはこれをピアノ独奏に圧縮する。右手と左手、そして足のペダル操作だけで。
O'Riley自身がこの困難さについて明言している。「自分のRadioheadのトランスクリプションはレパートリーの中で最も難しい部類に入る。プロコフィエフのピアノ協奏曲第2番も含めて」。彼は”There There”のある2小節を例に挙げ、「プロコフィエフ協奏曲の最難所とほぼ同じだ。それが40回続くだけだが」と語っている。
では具体的に、O'Rileyは何をしているのか。
まず声部の再配分だ。Radioheadの楽曲では、ボーカルメロディー、ギターの対旋律、ベースラインという複数の独立した声部が同時進行する。O'Rileyはこれらをピアノの音域全体に再配置する。ボーカルラインを右手の高音域で歌わせながら、左手でベースとリズムを支え、中音域でギターの対旋律を織り込む。バッハのインベンションやフーガを弾くときの声部分離技術が、ここで直接応用される。
次に電子的テクスチャーの変換だ。Jonny Greenwoodのオンドマルトノが生み出す浮遊感、Ed O'Brienのディレイペダルが作る「霧」、電子処理されたYorkeのボーカルが持つ非人間的な質感。これらはピアノという純粋に物理的な楽器では再現不可能に見える。O'Rileyはサステインペダルを精緻にコントロールすることで残響と音の溶け合いを作り出し、和声の不協和音を戦略的に配置することで電子的な「ざらつき」を模倣する。音楽評論家はこの技術を「ラヴェル的なハーモニー感覚とショスタコーヴィチ的な不協和音の使い方を駆使した翻訳」と表現している。
さらにリズムの再構築がある。Phil Selwayのドラムが刻むポリリズムやシンコペーションは、ピアノの左手に移植される。しかしただ移植するだけでは平板になる。O'Rileyは「リズム的に不安定な左手」と評されるアプローチで、ドラムのグルーヴ感をピアノのタッチの強弱と微妙なテンポの揺れで表現する。
彼はRadioheadの音楽の魅力についてこう説明している。
「Radioheadのメンバーの誰一人として譜面が読めないかもしれない。しかし、それぞれが特定のアイデアや動機という糸を曲に持ち込んでいる。それはバッハのフーガやショスタコーヴィチのフーガにおける複数の声部の絡み合いと、よく似ている」
この認識こそが、彼のアレンジをただのカバーと区別するものだ。5人分の音を単純に「減らす」のではなく、その声部構造の本質を保ちながら88鍵の上に再構築する。それは楽曲の解体と再組立であり、クラシック音楽の訓練なしには見えてこない作業だ。
ただしO'Riley自身も「すべての曲がピアノに翻訳できるわけではない」と知っていた。「”Pyramid Song”はあなたが歌わない限り、ピアノで弾こうとは思えない」とYorkeに伝えたとき、それはYorkeのボーカルという声部を失ったときに曲の核心が消えてしまうという判断だ。どの曲を選び、どの曲を避けるか。その編曲者としての眼力もまた、O'Rileyの技術の一部だった。
2003年にリリースされたTrue Love Waits: Christopher O'Riley Plays RadioheadはRolling Stone誌で4つ星を獲得した。クラシック作品としてRolling Stoneに4つ星をつけられたのは、事実上このアルバムだけだと言われている。
アルバムのリリース前後、O'RileyはThom Yorkeと直接言葉を交わす機会を得た。その会話の記録が、Radioheadという音楽の本質と、Yorkeという人物の両方を照らし出している。
O'Rileyがカバーアルバムを準備していた頃、Radioheadをよく知る友人たちは彼にこう警告したという。「彼らが君のバージョンを聴いて、”なんでわざわざ我々をカバーするんだ”と言っても驚かないほうがいい」。
実際にYorkeと対面したO'Rileyが発見したのは、想像とは全く異なる人物像だった。
O'Rileyが「1997年バージョンの”Lift”を編曲しています。古いバージョンのほうが好きで」と伝えると、Yorkeはこともなげに言い放った。「それは良かった、新しいバージョンはクソだから」。自分の曲に対するこの容赦ない自己評価が、Yorkeの一貫した姿勢だった。
さらにO'Rileyが「”Pyramid Song”はあなたが歌わない限り、ピアノで弾こうとは思えない」と言うと、Yorkeは間髪入れずに返した。「つまり、私が台無しにしなければいいんでしょ」。
O'Rileyが「”How to Disappear Completely”はギターとボーカルだけでは凡庸かもしれない。しかしJonnyが重ねた四分音のストリングスのクラウドがこの曲をユニークにしている」と語ったとき、Yorkeは黙ってわずかに微笑んだ。その微笑みには、自分では言語化しなかった何かを言い当てられた人間の表情があった。
O'Rileyはこの出会いをこう振り返っている。「非常に謙虚で自己卑下的な人物だった。ただ彼の素晴らしい音楽について話して過ごした」。
その後、O'RileyはアムステルダムでRadioheadのメンバー全員とも顔を合わせた。こちらはよりフレンドリーな雰囲気だったという。バンドとして活動する彼らと、一人でRadioheadの曲に向き合い続けるピアニストの間に、ある種の相互尊重が成立していた。
この出会いが示すのは、Yorkeが自分の音楽の価値を誰よりも低く見積もっているということだ。しかしその謙遜は、偽りの謙遜ではなく、完璧主義者が必然的に陥る「自作への飽くなき不満」から来ている。Kid Aで他のメンバーを困難に追い込んでまで方向を変えようとしたのも、その同じ衝動からだろう。
O'RileyがRadioheadに見出した多声部的な構造は、OK Computerやそれ以降の実験的な作品だけに宿っているわけではない。それはThe Bendsの時点で、すでに萌芽的に完成していた。
The Bendsは1995年3月にリリースされ、全英アルバムチャートで4位を記録した。シングルは5枚リリースされ、「High and Dry」が全英17位、「Fake Plastic Trees」が同20位、「Just」が同19位、そして最終シングル「Street Spirit (Fade Out)」が同5位を記録した。「Street Spirit」はそれまでの「Creep」を超えるチャート成績を収め、Radioheadが一発屋ではないことを証明した。アルバムは最終的に全英4倍プラチナ、全米プラチナを達成した。
チャートの数字よりも重要なのは、The BendsがRadioheadのバンドとしての作曲形態を確立した作品だということだ。Pablo Honeyではほぼ全曲をYorkeが書いていたのに対して、The Bendsでは各メンバーの声部が初めて自律し始めた。「Just」のギターパートはJonny Greenwoodが4オクターブにわたるオクタトニックスケールを駆使して作り上げ、DigiTech Whammyペダルでソロを高音域にピッチシフトするという独創的なアプローチを取った。「(Nice Dream)」はYorkeのシンプルな4コードの骨格に、O'BrienとGreenwoodがパートを追加して膨らませた。「Fake Plastic Trees」はYorkeが一人でギターを弾いたテイクをLeckieが録音し、そこにバンドが音を積み重ねるという逆転した方法で完成した。さらに「Black Star」はLeckieが席を外した日に、当時まだエンジニアだったNigel Godrichがバンドと録音した曲で、この日を起点にGodrichはRadioheadのすべての作品を手がける生涯のプロデューサーとなっていく。
こうした分業の多様化が、各曲に独立した声部を持たせる素地を作った。The BendsはBritpopが全盛を誇った1995年のイギリスにおいて、Oasisのような「懐古的なロック」とは全く異なる方向を向いていた。後にPitchforkはこの時期のYorkeとJonny Greenwoodのパートナーシップを「Lennon=McCartneyやJagger=Richardsに匹敵する」と評した。GarbageやR.E.M.がRadioheadを好きなバンドとして挙げ始め、The Cureはこのアルバムの音作りを自分たちの作品に応用したいと問い合わせてきたほどだ。
O'RileyがThe Bendsの曲を積極的にカバーしたことは、この見立てと一致している。True Love Waits(2003年)のトラックリストには、The Bendsから「Fake Plastic Trees」「Bulletproof...I Wish I Was」「Black Star」「Thinking About You」「You」が収録されている。OK Computer以降の実験的な楽曲と並べてThe Bendsの曲を選んだことは、O'Rileyの選曲眼が語ることとして重要だ。彼にとってRadioheadの音楽的深みはOK Computer以降に突然生まれたものではなく、The Bendsにおいてすでに十分にピアノ独奏へと翻訳するに値する多声部的構造を持っていた。
AllMusicの批評家はO'RileyのThe Bends曲のカバーについて「”Bulletproof”や”Motion Picture Soundtrack”のような暗くて落ち着いたナンバーは特にピアノへの翻訳がうまく機能している」と評した。これらの曲が持つ内省的な静けさと声部の絡み合いは、ピアノという楽器の特性と親和性が高い。逆にいえば、この時代のRadioheadがすでに「ロックバンドのサウンド」だけに依存しない音楽を書いていたことの証左でもある。
O'Rileyが指摘した「バッハ的構造」とは、具体的にどういうことか。
バッハのフーガの本質は、複数の独立した声部が同時進行しながら有機的に絡み合うことにある。各声部は「伴奏」ではなく、主題を持った対等な存在として機能する。Radioheadの5人もまた、それぞれが代替不可能な「声部」を担っていた。
Thom Yorkeは曲の骨格・歌詞・メロディーの主要な発信源だ。ピアノで曲の骨格を書きバンドに持ち込む。彼のボーカルは独立したメロディー声部として機能し、楽器群と拮抗する。
Jonny Greenwoodはクラシック現代音楽の素養を持ち込んだ存在だ。ギターのテクスチャー、弦楽アレンジ、オンドマルトノ、電子処理など「曲の外側の音響空間」を設計した。O'Rileyが「”How to Disappear Completely”はJonnyが重ねた四分音のストリングスのクラウドがこの曲をユニークにしている」と指摘したとき、Yorkeが微かに微笑んだことは先に述べた。その「声部」の重要性を、誰よりもYorke自身が知っていた。
Ed O'Brienはエフェクトとギターのテクスチャーで音の「霧」や「空間」を作る役割を担う。ディレイペダルの使い方一つで、楽曲全体の音響空間が変わる。
Colin Greenwoodのベースラインは単純な低音ではなく、独立したメロディー的な動きを持つ声部として機能する。Kid Aの「Dollars and Cents」のベースラインは、彼がAlice Coltraneのレコードをかけながら即興で弾いたものが原型だ。
Phil Selwayのドラムはジャズ的な柔軟性を持ち、拍を刻む以上に他の声部と対話する。
重要なのは、この「フーガ的構造」が意図的な設計ではなかったことだ。バンドメンバーの多くは譜面を読めない。しかしそれぞれが持ち寄る音楽的直感と経験が、偶然にもバッハが理論として構築した多声部音楽に近い何かを生み出した。「無意識に生まれた対位法」とでも呼ぶべき現象だ。
ただし、Pablo Honey(1993年)の段階ではそこまで至っていない。この時期はYorkeが書いた曲をバンドが演奏するという段階で、PixiesやDinosaur Jr.の影響下にある普通のオルタナロックだった。各メンバーの声部が自律し始めたのはThe Bends(1995年)から、そして完全に開花したのがOK Computerだった。
The Bendsのツアーを終えたRadioheadは、バスの中でMiles DavisのBitches Brew(1970年)を聴き続けていた。Jonnyはこう回想している。
「ある意味で僕らは傲慢だった。Bitches Brewのようなレコードを聴いて、それをやりたいと思った。誰もトランペットなど持っていないし弾きたくもないのに、”ああ、あれに近い何かができる”という傲慢さがあった」
YorkeはOK Computerの出発点を「Bitches Brewの信じられないほど密で恐ろしいサウンド」だと明言した。また、Ennio Morricone、クラウトロックバンドのCan、DJ Shadowのサンプリング技術も影響源として挙げた。
この段階ではエレクトロニカの影響はまだ萌芽的だ。「Airbag」の冒頭でPhil Selwayのドラムを16分間録音し、そこから数秒のループをMacintoshで加工してリズム構造の核にした。「Karma Police」の後半は、YorkeとGodrichが二人だけでサンプルとループを使って再構築した。これが後のKid Aへの「前哨戦」となった。
しかしOK Computerは根本的にはまだバンドの共同作業だ。影響を共有し、全員が「どこへ向かうか」に同意していた。
OK Computerの世界的成功のあと、Yorkeは奇妙な喪失感を経験した。Travis、Coldplayなどの後続バンドが自分たちのサウンドを模倣し始めたことに激しく反応し、ロックを聴くのを完全にやめた。
彼がコーンウォールの断崖を歩きながら聴き続けたのは、WarpレーベルのAphex Twin、Autechre、Boards of Canadaだった。後にAphex Twinを「自分のエレクトリックギターを必要としない別の世界を開いてくれた」と評している。
Yorkeが新曲を持ち込むとき、歌詞もなく、サウンドやリズムだけで構成された不完全なものばかりだった。Jonnyは「ただ芸術のための芸術的なロックになるのではないか」と恐れた。Colinはその「冷たさ」が好きになれなかった。プロデューサーのGodrichでさえ戸惑い、他のメンバーは脱退を真剣に考えた。Yorke自身も後に認めている。
「他のメンバーたちは何を貢献すればいいかわからなかった。シンセサイザーで作業していると、他の人と同じ部屋にいる感覚がなくなる。私は全員の人生をほぼ不可能にしてしまった」
しかしここにも「偶然のフーガ」が機能した瞬間がある。「Idioteque」はJonnyがモジュラーシンセサイザーで作った50分の即興演奏をYorkeに渡し、Yorkeがその中から40秒の断片を「絶対の天才だ」と感じて曲全体を構築したものだ。Yorkeの電子音楽的衝動とJonnyの音響的設計力が融合した瞬間だった。
Kid Aはバンドが崩壊しかけながらも生み出した作品だ。そしてその経験が、次の決断を準備した。
Hail to the Thief(2003年)のツアーを終えた後、Radioheadは休止期間に入った。Yorkeはその間に一人でラップトップと向き合い、音楽を作り始めた。それが2006年のソロアルバムThe Eraserになる。
これはRadioheadへの反発ではなかった。Jonnyは「彼がこれを出す必要があった。みんな喜んでいた」と語っている。Yorkeもリリース時に「ずっとこういうことをやってみたかった。楽しくてあっという間にできた。Radioheadは解散しない」と繰り返し強調した。
The Eraserの曲の多くは、Radioheadに「収まらなかった曲」だった。ホテルや飛行機の中で書かれた、バンドのフレームに入りきらない個人的な電子音楽の断片。Kid Aの制作でバンドを困難な状況に追い込んだ経験が、「次の電子音楽的衝動はバンドを巻き込まずに一人でやろう」という判断に繋がった。
その後YorkeはエレクトロニックバンドAtoms for Peaceを結成し、さらに近年はJonny GreenridgeとThe Smileを立ち上げた。The Smileはより多くのジャズ、クラウトロック、プログレッシブロックの影響を取り込んだ、より自由でワイルドなサウンドのプロジェクトだと評されている。
一本の線が浮かぶ。
中西部の夜に生まれたAmerican Footballのアルペジオが、Steve Reichのミニマリズムからインスピレーションを受けていたように。O'RileyがRadioheadの音楽にバッハのフーガを見出したように。YorkeがBitches Brewに「壊れながら積み上がる何か」を感じたように。
音楽の深さとは、ジャンルの垣根を超えて、同じ構造原理が異なる時代・文化・形式において反復されることかもしれない。O'Rileyのピアノが示したのは、Radioheadが「ロックバンド」という枠を超えた場所にいたという事実だ。
from Hiroaki Satou
When people think of Sigur Rós, they picture Jónsi's falsetto, the bowed guitar, the drift of meaningless syllables in Vonlenska. But behind that sound stands an American artist who arrived from outside Iceland. Alex Somers is not a member of the band, yet he was Jónsi's partner for over a decade — and since 2005 has been one of the most crucial figures in shaping the group's ambient depth.
Alex Somers was born in Baltimore, Maryland in 1984. At thirteen, alongside a guitar he received for Christmas, he acquired a Tascam four-track recorder and fell into a fascination with recording itself. “It wasn't about playing an instrument,” he recalled. “It was about controlling my own sonic environment.” He taped down keyboard keys with his brother, letting drones run for days. This analog experimentation became the root of everything that followed.
What matters here is that Somers went on to study at the Berklee College of Music in Boston, completing a double major in film scoring and music therapy — a full formal music education. Berklee's curriculum gave him a rigorous grounding in orchestration, music theory, and scoring technique, producing in Somers a rare duality: the instinctive experimenter and the structural designer who could build music on paper.
Sigur Rós, for all their musical grandeur, are a band whose language grew from intuition rather than academic training. Jónsi is a self-taught guitarist and the poet who invented Vonlenska; the band's entire vocabulary was shaped by feeling and experiment, not by the conservatoire. Somers's presence in that world is therefore strikingly singular: here was someone who could read and write orchestral scores, someone who could talk about arrangement as architecture — and he was standing closer to the band than almost anyone.
In 2002, while still at Berklee, Somers was introduced to Jónsi on the street outside the college when Sigur Rós came through Boston on tour. Jónsi is openly gay, and the two became a couple almost immediately. In the early months of the relationship, Jónsi would stay at Somers's Cambridge apartment between tours and recording sessions. Then in 2005, Somers made the decision to follow Jónsi to Reykjavík. The fact that a boy from Baltimore left his home country to live with his partner in Iceland is the origin point for everything that came after. In Reykjavík, Somers also enrolled at the Iceland Academy of the Arts (Listaháskóli Íslands) to study visual art. “Art school was far more musical than music school,” he later reflected. “Almost all my classmates were playing and experimenting. At music school, most people were just studying music.”
Living together in Reykjavík as a couple, music became inseparable from daily life. They recorded at home — the string quartet Amiina (longtime Sigur Rós collaborators) playing in the living room, the Kópavogsdætur Choir recorded in the same apartment. That handmade quality became embedded in the texture of the sound.
In February 2009, the pair retreated to a solar-powered raw-food commune in Hawaii to mix the tracks they had been recording intermittently over several years. Released that July as Riceboy Sleeps, under the name Jónsi & Alex, the album presented a world distinct from Sigur Rós's post-rock grandeur — more delicate, more ethereal, acoustic instruments and choir dissolving into one another.
Somers later recalled: “Before I opened a studio, music was always just in the house. It came from the walls. That felt very natural.” Riceboy Sleeps is that naturalness preserved in amber.
Somers's Berklee training works quietly in this album. Combining Amiina's string quartet with the Kópavogsdætur Choir, shaping each piece so that the whole functions as a structure of silence — that is not something made by instinct alone. It requires someone who understands the grammar of music as a language.
The Jónsi & Alex work All Animals has a different origin entirely from Riceboy Sleeps. It was commissioned by Thyssen-Bornemisza Art Contemporary (TBA21) for The Morning Line, a monumental public art structure designed by artist Matthew Ritchie. The piece was written and recorded in September 2008 in Reykjavík, using primarily acoustic instruments — piano, voice, and animal sounds.
The Morning Line itself was first unveiled at the 3rd Seville International Contemporary Art Biennial in 2008: a structure 8 metres high and 20 metres long, built from 17 tonnes of coated aluminium, conceived as a platform for exploring the intersections of art, architecture, music, mathematics, cosmology, and science. Jónsi & Alex were not the only composers commissioned — alongside them were Bryce Dessner, Mark Fell, Lee Ranaldo, Chris Watson, and others, each contributing works encoded for the installation's 47-channel spatial sound system.
All Animals was later included as a bonus CD in the limited-edition Riceboy Sleeps box set (3,500 numbered copies), first pressed on vinyl in 2017 in a run of 100 hand-painted copies, and repressed for Record Store Day 2018 in an edition of 1,000.
Immediately after Riceboy Sleeps, Sigur Rós began attempting a new album. They started recording in 2009 — ambient sketches, long drones — but lost their sense of direction and scrapped everything in 2010, entering an indefinite hiatus. The material existed. What the band had lost was the perspective to assemble it into something coherent.
In 2011 the band reconvened, this time at Somers's Reykjavík studio. He had been brought on to mix. But after a week spent deep in the material, he found something buried there. “I realized I was listening to an amazing collection of songs,” he said. “But the guys were at a stage where they were losing focus, and it was difficult to assemble everything and make sense of it all.”
What Somers did was concrete: he surveyed the scattered drones and sketches from above, then redesigned them — deciding what to add, what to cut, how to sequence. He added texture and focus to ambient drones, presented the band with a list of overdubs to record, and encouraged them to use Icelandic lyrics in place of Vonlenska. The intuition Berklee had sharpened — the ability to think of music as a whole rather than a collection of parts — was being applied directly to a Sigur Rós album for the first time. After six weeks of sessions, the fragments coalesced into Valtari (2012). The word means “steamroller” in Icelandic; Jónsi described it as “something large that slowly rolls over you.”
Drowned in Sound wrote: “In 2011, the band alongside Alex Somers started the painstaking forensic task of piecing together a cohesive and magical work from disparate constituent parts.” It was work only someone with an outsider's perspective, a deep insider's fluency, and the structural vocabulary of a trained musician could have done.
In 2018, Sigur Rós launched the ambient project Liminal, run jointly by Jónsi, Alex Somers, and producer Paul Corley. Corley is an American composer and producer known for his work with Oneohtrix Point Never and Tim Hecker, and a member of the Icelandic label Bedroom Community. He became Sigur Rós's live Music Director in 2016, and has since been the electronic and sonic anchor of the band's ambient work.
Liminal means “threshold” — the project draws listeners into the membrane between waking and sleep, neither here nor there. Crucially, Liminal was made by exactly the same team as 2016's Route One. NPR introduced Liminal's launch by noting it followed “last year's Route One” by “the same crew.” Route One and Liminal are not separate works; they are the first and second movements of a sustained ambient investigation by Jónsi, Somers, and Corley.
Of Liminal Sleep (2019), the centrepiece of the project, the three wrote: “We like the fact that sleep remains defiantly mysterious; something we all do — all need to do — but can't ever get fully inside. This playlist is a modest attempt to mirror the journey of a sleep cycle, with its curves, steady states and natural transitions.”
Somers here is not merely a collaborator but one of the project's architects — weaving the entirety of the Sigur Rós catalogue, solo work, film scores, and AI-generated music into what the project describes as “a multi-faceted perspective on the whole Sigur Rós creative universe.” His lifelong understanding of ambient music as environmental design is the skeleton holding this project upright.
Route One precedes Liminal by two years and represents the starting point of the same team's ambient exploration. On the longest day of summer 2016, Sigur Rós drove the entire 1,332-kilometre loop of Iceland's ring road, broadcasting the 24-hour journey live on YouTube while a soundtrack was generated in real time alongside it. This was the Slow TV ambient experiment Route One — and 2016 was also the year Paul Corley joined as live Music Director and co-produced the single “Óveður.” Route One was the first fruit of the moment Somers and Corley both arrived in the band's orbit.
The music was generated using BRONZE, a dedicated generative music platform developed in 2011 by Mike Grierson of Goldsmiths University and musician Gwilym Gold. The system's design principle: “every sound is subject to a set of laws, with a new and unique track generated in real time on every playback.” It is not random — the composer sets the rules — which places it philosophically in the same lineage as Max/MSP or Pure Data, the music programming environments taught in many music schools and universities.
Multi-track stems from “Óveður” were fed into BRONZE, which endlessly recombined them in real time. That is what made 24 hours — or over 25 in the full version — of continuous music possible. This is neither a remix nor an improvisation; it is algorithmic variation, directly analogous to Brian Eno's earliest ambient experiments with tape loops displaced slightly in phase.
There is no public record of Somers directly programming the BRONZE system, but Corley's deep background in electronics work — honed across years of collaboration with Oneohtrix Point Never and Tim Hecker — likely made him the bridge between the system and the band's musical intentions. Somers, trained at Berklee in an environment where music programming tools like Max are standard, was not far from this mode of thinking either. The record of their direct involvement may be incomplete; what Route One's achievement makes clear is how naturally this team connected to the idea of composing music as programmable law.
Each track takes its name from the GPS coordinates of a stop along the road: 63°32'43.7”N 19°43'46.3”W, 64°02'44.1”N 16°10'48.5”W, and so on — location data as title. The album was initially released at Iceland's Norður og Niður festival in hand-painted sleeves by artist Sigga Björg, then repressed for Record Store Day 2018.
As Treble Zine observed, Route One bridges the placid serenity of Valtari with the ice-burned sullenness of Kveikur, a continuation of the aesthetic universe the band has been building toward: pagan sea caves, volcanic glass, old Viking space. And Route One connects directly into Liminal: the three — Jónsi, Somers, Corley — pursued throughout both projects a single consistent thought: that music need not be a finished object, but a perpetually generated environment.
Sigur Rós's musical language grew from somewhere other than formal education. Jónsi is self-taught; the band's entire expression was shaped by instinct and experiment rather than the conservatoire. When the band began moving seriously toward orchestral collaboration, they always needed someone who could speak that language structurally. Alex Somers filled that gap.
His Berklee training in orchestration and film scoring gave him the practical ability to write specific musical instructions for strings, woodwind, brass, and choir. When he combined Amiina's quartet with the Kópavogsdætur Choir on Riceboy Sleeps, when he layered texture and focus onto Valtari's drones, when he designed the ensemble architecture of Liminal — all of it was work that requires a trained musician's ear.
At the Barbican in 2019, Jónsi and Somers performed Riceboy Sleeps in its entirety with the London Contemporary Orchestra — 25 players spanning strings, woodwind, horns, and percussion. “It's pretty amazing that we get to play the whole album in running order with an orchestra and choir,” Jónsi said. “It brings new meaning, new life, different shades and textures.”
Since the release of ÁTTA in 2023, Sigur Rós have established full orchestral accompaniment as their standard touring format — conductor Robert Ames leading local 41-piece orchestras (the Wordless Music Orchestra, the LCO, the Detroit Symphony Orchestra, and others) across Europe and North America. In 2025, at the Royal Albert Hall, they performed “Ára bátur” live for the first time with the LCO. The 2026 final tour leg has seen them collaborate with the Scottish Chamber Orchestra, the Bilbao Symphony Orchestra, and others city by city.
The foundation for all of this was laid over years: the string arrangements of Riceboy Sleeps, the layering on Valtari, the ensemble design of Liminal — work that only someone with formal musical training could have done. That Sigur Rós now stand in the world's great concert halls alongside full orchestras owes something, at least in part, to this accumulated groundwork.
In December 2025, Sigur Rós released Takk... (The Tape Variations): a full reworking of the 2005 classic by Sidney Satorsky, a Toronto-based producer. “Takk... has been one of my favourite albums since it was released 20 years ago,” Satorsky wrote. “When I was invited to collaborate, I wanted to explore creating alternate versions of the songs that felt at home somewhere between sleep and awake.”
Satorsky had already served as co-producer on Jónsi & Alex's Lost and Found (2019), placing him well inside this ambient creative orbit rather than as an unknown outsider.
A suggestive thread runs through the choice. Alex Somers has been manipulating tape since he was thirteen — layering recordings on a Tascam, building environments from sound. The official description of Lost and Found explicitly cites “tape experiments” as central to the work. In Satorsky, Somers may have found a collaborator who shared not just musical sensibility but a particular relationship to tape as material — the sense that recording is less about capture than transformation. Tape is, for Somers, the origin point of what it means to make music at all. That memory and aesthetic instinct may well have shaped the eye that selected the person to reinterpret a twenty-year-old masterpiece.
If Alex Somers's contribution must be summarised in a phrase, it is this: an ear that could speak the inside language from the outside. He was never a band member, but by living in Reykjavík with Jónsi as his partner, he came to understand Sigur Rós's musical grammar more deeply than almost anyone. The two separated in 2019, but their creative relationship has continued — Jónsi and Somers remain collaborators and friends.
His film-scoring training at Berklee, his immersion in visual art at the Iceland Academy of the Arts, his lifelong accumulation of tape experiments — all of these fed into a singular role in Sigur Rós's ambient deepening.
In Valtari, he sculpted material out of fog. In Liminal, he designed the border between sleep and music. In Route One, he helped set algorithm and Icelandic geography dissolving into one another. In Takk... (The Tape Variations), he passed a love of tape as material to the next collaborator in the circle. These are not separate events — they are expressions of a single coherent sensibility.
Sigur Rós remains Sigur Rós. But much of the ambient depth in their music may trace back to the moment a boy from Baltimore first put his hands on a Tascam four-track at the age of thirteen — and realized that sound was an environment you could control.