Our Father Who art in Heaven Hallowed be Thy name Thy Kingdom come Thy will be done on Earth as it is in Heaven Give us this day our daily Bread And forgive us our trespasses As we forgive those who trespass against us And lead us not into temptation But deliver us from evil

Amen

Jesus is Lord! Come Lord Jesus!

Come Lord Jesus! Christ is Lord!

Water In The Distance

Far to winning floes The living have a dream And here this night we ran And saw stupor in its frame The chance of our affair To yesterday the whole of place in pond And distance from our rest In time forgive and known unto Place to be far and shore And occupant of still These duly soldiers walk in pain But willing on in peace and at this year We bless and blame the star of our accord Might and force to these seams we are at head Made to strife and current stop reune The place at night is war,- at staccato effect we earn and seasontide our press- who stand for shoals and making some unblame The showstop in her way as clock to distance on the march,- and to get wet this morning at the chill we know of Heaven And in our last benediction came ruin And vices then and for the distance Ruin and ruin of dengue with the specious drop of turns in blood And as it was November,- we stayed and wept at war and for the wretched Seeding home and curve to know our end of nights This year of us in mourning to our sons and crystal babes- denied as children in our grasp to light the dawn and let us rise The hearts unbeared to see This happenstance of then And when we walk to her, this spring of chance We’ll walk away the water until it burns,- and we will pass like many River making never and proud at touch of presence God in Heaven, refill this aquifer in Jesus Christ,- and let us borrow one more crutch- Waiting for the crops til Winter void and beings hush so far among your grace Favours for unto to let all things be relief and knowing pain together,- wonder war and good pursuit to sell us rain Thoughts of Heaven and before This God of Water aching to our being Tide to never rising But at once a soul as this- greatest storm from Holy strength And I object to Never as that flight at one that tried to burn us all- and rather Sun to our better day This tiny ditch, Apostles’ Creek And we’ll imbibe forever to the distance, hanging near And empty hands will falter Jettison this funeral, Distance May Our need for free esteem and to that well, our new obsession- One hundred percent and to our laws this tiny poem for best ahead- and neighbours feeling fine And all who dressed to Bethlehem We have spoken to the dark and sky of rain Our path will show the ruin for God to see And all our prayers renew- Our victim souls.

HIV

Into the scrape of death,- I sorted things to see And what went into, hiding This understudy and moral ratchet The year of pestilence untidy And who and wonder and her The day of prayer in socket And life as sober, ending well The sky pressed into my hand And heart and please The shoal of weapons, sky Inpostuous ruin and little things Like a day without her to remind In bearing Bread and life beautiful- as much as a husband provides And in this day for reasoning and sense,- I pocketed two of Rome For in there lives a body within To the beautiful and greatest I know And sunset no, for her problem And this difficult repeat for its place Tectonic to nine and moral bits to be home There was nothing left but surrender And to this day of Andrew and knowing where- But what of my esteem am I friending To seasons betold and maybe betrayed I was poor or maybe then not For four duly nights distracted I wished imperil for all for two seconds And knowing the whole of us to muster in truth The days of abandon are done.

Mangrove

To the forest I saw the deep Afraid at Kingdom night These special hearts would glow Fifteen years and sparkle gem Afraid to know Time’s repeating right The missing in St. Pattern to call mine Dust in gravity And what a cube is for Water lively says Come in A hold for just a minute Time away from keeps in our bateau Somebody has seen us Our right and left to dip Hands sliding and our go To beautiful and best The years of now forever The current, every star Dip in remand and shaking,- With purpose, we hide our breath These trees across to line the East In musted deep We sobbed at wild grasses And nurtured within our best Days of in this wall and fitting gently Under the forest Fire as our light But at sleep and so due The timeless match, our Water And I met, anew A simple and organic- Fed to the original- Our guess Beknighting future This our way of war To us lay henge And putting back for Heaven The road and only Communion in our hand And facing West,- we know Philosophy is lost And we will fly Dates of year and one Christmas and alone But see the Earth and why Crescent cherished Moon Spike our glow and let us in Purchased all corrections And silent to God Made for giving This chapter of You, Father Giving us back our time- and water of life Made for shepherd-breathing Finding forever Christ in our path And way to make His room A mangrove flow- free and hope to all men And to yours.

Tonight I choose to listen to a MLB Game: my Texas Rangers vs the KC Royals. The game is scheduled to start at 6:40 PM CDT. I'll tune into 105.3 The Fan, DFW's #1 Sports station, early to listen to pregame coverage, and I'll stay with this station for the radio call of the game.

And the adventure continues

Having had interesting conversations with various friends has made me in a great mood as i lie here atop the bed in my underwear with my dogs nearby

I had my picture taken today for the access card. When I saw the lunatic grinning back at me — from a red and bloated face with a wild beard and asymmetrical nose which has a tint of red just like the beard — on the screen

The lady asked me if I was happy with the picture, I just shrugged and said well I look like that

I used to be handsome and now I look like a that,

it’s my face

It looks like that

I like it, it’s mine

And I have been speaking about stuff from deep within with my friends, I showed them the kintsugi vase I am making of myself, and thus vulnerable, they help me put the pieces back together

Again

Because I value my kindness and have opted to try to keep this side of myself

Because without it, I am not sure who I would be

But still, this time it’ll be darker

There’s no helping it

And the temperature is mild, the dogs are mild, and the moon is somewhere up there in the sky

I am the luckiest man I know

Today didn’t follow anything I planned, but that’s becoming normal. The day came in loud, someone entering like they owned the air in the room, uncalled for, calling my name too sharply for how early it felt. I don’t even remember what they needed. Just the disruption of it stayed behind. That noise stuck in my head. Disgusting. After that, everything felt slightly off rhythm. Like I was responding to things a second too late, but still getting them right enough that nobody noticed.

I thought I’d bake when I got home. Something simple to keep my misery away. I didn’t. Not the chef of today’s episode. Walked away. I’m not as drained as I used to be, which is strange. I feel steady. And I’m not going to apologize for not writing for a few days, it’s my notes. And I’ll disappear whenever I do. Just things have changed now. There was a time not long ago when nights ended differently. When the silence felt heavier, and numbing it seemed like the only way to keep it from echoing. Alcohol, cigarettes used to sit somewhere in that space, not as a solution, just as something that blurred the edges enough to get through. But that isn’t where things are now. Something changed the direction of that pattern before it could repeat itself. It feels like an interruption (not really). almost like a presence that steps in right when everything starts leaning toward disappearing into my old habits again, just enough to pull me back into the room. Like an angel, if I let myself use that word without overthinking it. Not something dramatic, just something that arrives at the moment things start slipping and doesn’t let them fall all the way.

Just. in the way something can appear right on time and make me pause before I disappear into an old habit again. And maybe that’s enough. For now, I just notice that I’m still here, and the night doesn’t feel like something I need to escape from.

P.S. I wrote that earlier this day, its past midnight. I might be an overthinker a fool. part of me still thinks this is a trap or some delayed consequence finally catching up to me in a prettier form. angel, maybe I am being used, maybe i am being fooled, maybe one day i'll find out i understood everything completely wrong. but even so. None of those thoughts seems strong enough to stop it. my heart keeps returning anyway. it yearns. and yearns. completely uninterested in whatever concerns my brain keeps raising. im afraid im the fool one in this new story of mine.

Sincerely, A fool losing every argument with his own thoughts.

Ahmed

I’m a bike commuter, and I think ghost bikes are counterproductive.

Most of you will probably not know what a ghost bike is, so here goes: when someone is killed on their bike, bike advocates will often paint a bike white and lock it to something at the scene of the crash to memorialize the dead and to draw attention to the shortage of good bike infrastructure.

Most people, as I said, have no idea what ghost bikes are about, so if the intent is to make a statement to the wider community, I don’t think it’s succeeding. But also—I don’t think the presence of a ghost bike helps change the behavior of car drivers. In the unlikely event that they know what it means, they’ll doubtless think the bike had it coming because that’s how it’s always reported when people in cars kill people on bikes.

But of course we don’t have ghost people at the site of pedestrian fatalities (at least not ones we can see) nor ghost cars where fatal car crashes have happened. So the presence of ghost bikes gives the impression that biking is a uniquely dangerous mode of transportation. This, of course, isn’t true, but also it discourages people from biking, and the more people who bike, the safer it is to bike.

So, yeah, like I said. Counterproductive.

Also? Waste of a good bike.

Викторија Стојовска – Биографија

Викторија Стојовска е македонска авторка, поетеса и блогерка од Кичево. Активно твори повеќе години, градејќи препознатлив литературен израз кој се одликува со искреност, емотивна длабочина и силна поврзаност со човечките чувства.

Нејзиното творештво опфаќа поезија, проза, кратки приказни, колумни и новели. Во своите дела ги истражува темите на љубовта, загубата, надежта, личното созревање, внатрешните борби и потрагата по сопствениот идентитет. Нејзините текстови се инспирирани од реални животни искуства, лични емоции и приказни кои оставаат трага во човековата душа.

Активен член е на Литературниот клуб „Китка“ од Кичево и учесник на бројни литературни манифестации, конкурси и културни настани, каде има освоено повеќе награди и признанија за своето творештво.

Во 2020 година го отвора својот литературен блог, преку кој редовно ја споделува својата поезија и проза со читателите, создавајќи препознатлива читателска публика.

Нејзина прва објавена книга е „Парчиња од себеси“, дело составено од кратки приказни, прозни записи и дијалози инспирирани од реалноста и човечките емоции. Книгата е дел од едицијата „Книжевни меридијани“ во рамките на современата македонска книжевност и е добитник на наградата „Душата на чаршијата“.

По неа следуваат делата „Своја“ и „Куклата од театарот“, книги во кои авторката продолжува да ги истражува најдлабоките човечки чувства, љубовта, загубата, женската сила и процесот на лична трансформација.

Она што ја издвојува Викторија Стојовска е нејзиниот препознатлив стил директен, искрен и емотивен. Нејзините текстови допираат до читателот преку едноставноста на изразот и длабочината на чувствата, оставајќи простор секој да пронајде дел од сопствената приказна во нејзините зборови.

Издадени дела: • „Парчиња од себеси“ • „Своја“ • „Куклата од театарот“

Е- книги • „Нејзините чувства “

„Пишувам за она што боли, лекува, останува и живее во нас долго откако ќе помине.“

Hello again. I hope your week is going well.

After POTUS declared that he didn't care about the financial struggles of the American people, he has now declared “I love the inflation.” POTUS doesn't care about the country he is responsible for. As long as a problem doesn't touch him personally, he doesn't care who is having problems, and he doesn't care how badly those problems affect the people.

Again and again POTUS has proven that he is unfit for the office he holds. He needs to be removed from office as soon as possible. The people need to let congress know they must do their job and get rid of this incompetent person. It is the only way to save the nation from further problems.

POTUS Roaster

Thanks for reading my posts. If you want to see the rest of them, please go to write.as/potusroaster/archive/

To email us send it too potusroaster@gmail.com

Please tell your family, friends and neighbors about the posts.

The broken system we have to endure only continues to stagger on because the majority of people have yet to withdraw their consent. That sounds like I'm going to condemn the majority for continuing to go along with a system that doesn’t reflect our desire for a better, more meaningful existence doesn't it? Well, I'm not going to condemn people for appearing to go along with a dysfunctional, increasingly dystopian system because that's not my style.

With the way things have been set up, the vast majority of people are too busy slogging their guts out trying to make ends meet to build whatever life they can manage in a failing system. After an exhausting week, understandably all they want to do with whatever downtime they may have is to try and chill out as far as possible between all of the life admin and other crap that's part and parcel of modern life. What gets me is those people who claim to have 'woken up' calling out everyone else for being so called 'sheep' and ‘normies’. That's the kind of elitist crap that gets me riled up.

In the years since the Covid 'crisis' broke, a decent number of people have become more alert to what's being done to them in the name of the 'Great Reset' and why it's being done to them. Not all of them saw through things at the outset. It took me a few months before the pieces started to fall into place and I could start to see through the narrative I was being fed. Some are only just realising now what was actually done to us. People will come to see things at different paces and in different ways. Those who claimed to see through the narrative from day one and who roundly condemned those who didn't, need to take a long hard look at themselves.

One of the reasons why this is the case is that what some dubbed the 'freedom' or 'truth' movement was never really a cohesive enterprise. If anything it was an uneasy coalition of convenience for a fairly wide range of people. One that was never destined to last. So, it shouldn't come as any surprise that the messaging from those of us opposing what has been done to us over the last few years wasn’t exactly clear or consistent. Such is life. It's down to those of us with a platform to work out how we can communicate the need for the crumbling system we have to be replaced from the grassroots upwards with something that meets our needs on our terms. It's also important to do so without hectoring or preaching. This is not an easy task!

If you talk to most people in depth, they'll most likely admit they know things are falling apart at the seams and that it's harder to trust those in authority to look after their interests. What they don't feel confident about is how to set about making a challenge and start to build something better. Given the daunting scale of the task, it's understandable that most people feel that all they can do is keep their heads down and hope for the best.

I haven't got a blueprint for how society could look after any radical change. Anyone coming along with a blueprint and a ready made plan for change needs to be treated with the utmost suspicion. All I have are some tentative suggestions and principles, based on an understanding that most ordinary people can be trusted to do the right thing. This is a work in progress and I don't claim to have a magic formula when it comes to succinctly communicating an idea that will make people stop and think, and then start to ask some awkward questions.

One thing I’m doing my level best to do is to encourage people to start quietly withdrawing their consent for the system to carry on functioning as it is. I recognise that most people's circumstances mean that they can't fully opt out and go off to live in a self sufficient community of like minded people. That's how things have been set up to ensure that we remain trapped in their shitshow of a system. That's what they want to think anyway...

Quietly withdrawing consent can involve a pretty wide range of actions, each of which has the potential to throw a small spanner in the works. When taken cumulatively, they can end up throwing a massive spanner in the works. It starts with getting out of the cycle of constantly upgrading and instead, making stuff last longer with an emphasis on repairing rather than replacing. Questioning whether you actually need all of the stuff that surrounds you is is next step. That involves reassessing priorities. Rather than sitting isolated at home glued to a screen, get together with friends and neighbours for face to face interaction and analogue amusements:) Taking control of at least some of your food supply by growing and processing it yourself is another way of breaking out from the system. Again, it's another endeavour that's better done in tandem with others as it will build strong, independent grassroots networks.

There's also growing resistance to the digitisation of ever more aspects of our lives from buying train tickets to the attempts to get us to abandon cash and pay for everything using so called smartphones. So, what to do? There are no easy answers to this. The bastards are digitising many aspects of our lives, making it harder and harder to live without an Internet connection, let alone a smartphone. A smartphone in our pockets that acts as a tether to what’s becoming a digital prison. If we ditch the smartphone and the Internet connection, the bastards have made damn sure that our lives will be very difficult indeed, if not impossible. They’ve engineered it like that so we find it harder and harder to escape the control grid they’re herding us into. Getting people addicted to the social media available on their smartphones is a part of the plan. This is something that as a self confessed, seventy year old Luddite, I feel strongly about and intend to explore in some depth in future pieces.

Then there’s the news agenda, or what passes for 'news' in the age of nudging, fear porn, divide and rule and full on psy-ops. It's an agenda designed to keep us in fear, hoping the authorities will come up with a solution to the hassle and shite of everyday life. When a fair number of those problems appear to be designed to generate a strong reaction followed up by a 'solution' from the authorities that will suit the interests of the powers that be while further diminishing our agency and freedom, it's time to withdraw our consent.

It's simply a case of refusing to view their crap while at the same time, seeking out independent reportage and commentary that’s concerned with the truth and open debate rather than garnering a massive amount of views and keeping us fearful and at each other's throats. Sadly, it needs to be noted that there are charlatans and massive egos circulating in alternative media circles so, discretion and critical thinking do need to be applied to ensure that you can trust what you’re reading.

As already stated, this is not a comprehensive list of ways people can start to quietly withdraw their consent from a toxic system. To come up with such a list would be arrogant. All I want to do with this piece is offer some pointers and get people to start the process of thinking how they can circumvent and undermine a system that's geared up to serve the elites and actively works against our hopes and aspirations. The more creative people can get with this, the better...

I’m alone in the half renovated apartment

The dogs were happy to see me and are now waiting for food.

We went out for a walk just before a whole rainy day’s worth of water fell down, I could see it and hear it through the window

A type of weather associated with doomsdays but now again the sun is shining

Just like that, a fit of rage from up above or something, then it’s like nothing happened, 

But the ground is wet

And i’m making food also for myself; I’m about to eat some stuff i’ve found in the freezer; an assortment of random food from all over the world

And I’ve got some tzatziki still

I ate for lunch too

I bet I smelt of garlic for my new colleagues

This amuses me somewhat

I did not think today would actually ever come. I thought the situation would change and the “last day” could be avoided. It feels weird not having control of the circumstances. I can’t tell if I feel relief or nervousness about potentially having to start over…

I have not thought about what to tell people when they ask why I am not working. I am sure I will come up with something vague, but I actually have to pack up my things now. That feels odd. I don’t feel like I am finished here, maybe I can come back once things clear up, but I am also curious about trying something new. I have so many ideas but I struggle with bringing them to fruition.

I definitely need to refocus on my health. My sleeping and eating habits are not good and are affecting me in more ways than just feeling tired or hungry. I have regained weight I had already lost and I am positive my cortisol levels have shot high. I need to take care of myself so that will be my first task.

I may not know what the next few weeks will bring, but at least I know what I can do in the meantime.

China's remarkable economic transformation over the past four decades is well documented. Less discussed, but equally important, is the role that education — and specifically English education — plays in the country's ongoing development strategy.

English proficiency is not a niche skill in modern China. It is embedded in the national education system as a core subject from primary school through university. It is a required component of the Gaokao, the national university entrance examination. It is valued by employers across virtually every sector of the economy. And it is recognised by policymakers as essential for China's continued integration with global markets, scientific communities, and diplomatic networks.

The Chinese government has invested significantly in expanding educational access in rural areas. School construction, teacher training, and technology deployment have all been priorities. Yet the gap between rural and urban English education remains substantial, reflecting deeper structural challenges: the difficulty of recruiting and retaining qualified English teachers in remote areas, the lack of English-language environments outside the classroom, and the economic pressures that force rural families to prioritise immediate income over long-term educational investment.

The I Love Learning Education and Training Centre in Changtu County complements these national efforts by providing targeted, community-based English instruction that addresses the specific needs of rural learners. Its phonics-based approach, international teaching staff, and scholarship programme represent a model of how non-governmental organisations can work constructively within China's educational framework to reach underserved populations.

The Centre's work aligns with broader national priorities: reducing poverty through education, narrowing the urban-rural development gap, and preparing the next generation for participation in an increasingly interconnected global economy.

A donation of £19 provides a one-month scholarship. Support a model that advances national goals while transforming individual lives.

Support education that serves China's future

The Short Version

Most plant diagnosis tools show you a confidence number. Confidence tells you how strongly the model picked an answer – not whether you should act on it. Those are different questions, and on a hard photo they get different answers: a model can be very confident and flat wrong. If you're feeding a diagnosis into an automation – a Home Assistant flow, a grow-room controller, a dashboard alert – the signal you actually want is reliability: how trustworthy is this answer, on this specific image? PlantLab returns both. Here's how to use each, and why automation should gate on reliability, not confidence.

---

The failure mode nobody warns you about

Here's the trap. You wire a plant diagnosis API into an automation. When the model says “magnesium deficiency” with 0.9 confidence, you trigger an action – a notification, a nutrient-dosing routine, a log entry. It works in testing. The clear photos you tested with all return high confidence and correct answers.

Then a real photo arrives: backlit, half in shadow, two plants in frame, taken at midnight because something looked off. The model returns “magnesium deficiency” at 0.9 confidence again. Except this time it's wrong, because that confidence number was never a promise about correctness. It was a statement about how strongly the model leaned toward one class. On an ambiguous image, the model can lean hard in the wrong direction and report a high number while doing it.

A confidence score that's only trustworthy on easy photos isn't a trust signal. It's a confidence display. And the cases where you most need to know whether to trust an answer are exactly the cases where raw confidence is least informative.

This isn't hypothetical. A wave of consumer photo-diagnosis apps has shipped in the last year, and most of them do the same thing: wrap a general-purpose vision model and print a “confidence” percentage next to the answer. The problem is that a general-purpose model handed a plant photo will produce a confident-looking number whether or not it has any real basis for the call – the percentage reflects how hard the model leaned, not how often it's right when it leans that hard. A confidence figure with nothing calibrating it against actual outcomes is decoration. It looks like a trust signal and behaves like one right up until the photo gets hard, which is the moment you needed it most.

---

Three different questions

The fix is to stop treating “confidence” as one signal and recognize that an automated diagnosis is really answering three separate questions.

Signal	The question it answers	Where it lives
Per-class confidence	“How strongly did the model pick each condition?”	confidence on each item in conditions[]
Reliability	“Should this whole diagnosis be acted on, on this image?”	reliability_score on the response
Policy threshold	“What does my system do at each trust level?”	Your code

Per-class confidence is the model's strength of preference for a specific condition. It's useful when you want to know what the model saw and how it ranked the possibilities. It is not a verdict on whether the overall answer is safe to act on.

Reliability is a single number from 0 to 1 that estimates how trustworthy the entire diagnosis is on this particular image. It's the signal that stays informative on the hard cases – the ambiguous, badly-lit, multi-plant photos where you most need to know whether to trust the result. Higher is better. Low means “something about this image makes the answer shaky, double-check before acting.”

The policy threshold is yours. The API gives you a number; your system decides what to do at each level. That decision is a product choice, not a model output, and it's where the actual safety lives.

---

Wiring automation to the right signal

The practical rule for any automation: branch on reliability, then use per-class confidence for the details.

A reasonable starting policy, which you should tune to your own tolerance for false actions:

• High reliability (say, above 0.7): safe to act automatically. Update the dashboard, log the plant state, trigger the routine. This is the band where automating saves you work without costing you trust.
• Middle reliability (roughly 0.3 to 0.7): don't act blind. This is the band to ask for a second photo, queue the case for a human glance, or surface a “check this one” flag instead of firing an action.
• Low reliability (below 0.3): do not automate. Show the result as informational at most. Acting on a low-reliability diagnosis is how an automation does the wrong thing confidently.

The reason this ordering matters: per-class confidence will happily hand you a high number in all three bands. Reliability is what separates them. If you gate automation on confidence alone, you'll take action on the 2 AM backlit photo. If you gate on reliability, that photo lands in the “ask for another shot” band where it belongs.

For an integrator, this also means you don't have to build your own uncertainty handling from scratch. The hard part – estimating whether an answer holds up on a given image – is in the response. Your job is to pick the cutoffs that match what your automation does when it's wrong.

---

Why PlantLab returns a single reliability number

PlantLab used to return rule-based trust fields derived from the model's confidences. Those were removed in favor of a single learned reliability signal, and the API schema was bumped to make the change loud rather than silent. The full migration writeup is linked below.

The short version of why: a trust signal assembled from a handful of rules works on easy cases and falls apart on hard ones, which is the opposite of what you want. A trust signal is only earning its keep on the ambiguous cases – the ones where the answer genuinely might be wrong. So PlantLab consolidated to one number, on one contract: a 0-to-1 reliability score, present whenever the API returns a condition diagnosis, designed to stay honest on the cases that matter.

One implementation note worth knowing: reliability is omitted when there's no condition diagnosis to score – for a non-cannabis photo, or a healthy plant. Treat a missing score as “no score available,” not as a low score. Your automation logic should handle absence explicitly rather than defaulting it to zero.

---

The product principle underneath

A diagnosis API that always answers, always confidently, is easy to build and dangerous to automate against. The harder thing – and the one I think actually matters – is an API that knows when to slow you down, that can say, in effect, “I have an answer, but this image is the kind where I'm often wrong, so don't wire a pump to this one.”

That's what the confidence-versus-reliability distinction is really about. Confidence is the model talking about itself. Reliability is the system telling you whether to listen. For anything beyond a human reading a single result on a screen – and especially for automation that acts without a person in the loop – reliability is the number to build on.

---

PlantLab is free to try at plantlab.ai. Three diagnoses a day, results in milliseconds. Every diagnosis returns a reliability score; the full API documentation lives at plantlab.ai/docs.

---

FAQ

What's the difference between confidence and reliability?

Per-class confidence is how strongly the model picked a specific condition. Reliability is how trustworthy the whole diagnosis is on this particular image. A model can be highly confident in a wrong answer on an ambiguous photo – which is exactly why you want a separate reliability signal for automation decisions.

Which signal should I use to trigger an automation?

Reliability. Gate the automation on the reliability score (act high, verify middle, don't automate low), then use per-class confidence for the details of what to display or log. Gating on confidence alone will take action on hard photos where confidence is high but the answer isn't trustworthy.

What thresholds should I use?

A reasonable starting point is above 0.7 for automatic action, 0.3 to 0.7 for “ask for another photo or a human check,” and below 0.3 for “don't automate.” These are starting values – tune them to how costly a wrong action is in your setup.

What if the reliability score is missing?

It's omitted when there's no condition diagnosis to score – a non-cannabis photo or a healthy plant. Treat absence as “no score available,” not as a low score, and handle it explicitly in your code.

Does a high confidence number mean the diagnosis is correct?

No. Confidence reflects how strongly the model leaned toward an answer, not whether the answer is right. On clear photos the two usually agree; on ambiguous ones they can diverge, which is the whole reason reliability exists as a separate signal.

---

Related reading: – How PlantLab Knows When It Might Be Wrong: The reliability_score Field – The schema change and one-line migration – How PlantLab's AI Diagnoses 31 Cannabis Plant Problems in 18 Milliseconds – The pipeline behind the API – Build an Autonomous Plant Health Monitor with AI + Home Assistant – Where reliability thresholds earn their keep