Want to join in? Respond to our weekly writing prompts, open to everyone.
Want to join in? Respond to our weekly writing prompts, open to everyone.
from
SmarterArticles

The thing about walking down a street is that you have never had to ask permission to do it. You step out of your house, you turn onto the pavement, and you move through the world as one anonymous body among millions, your face an unremarkable fact that nobody records and nobody keeps. That assumption, ancient and quiet and almost never examined, is the thing a class-action lawsuit filed on 2 June 2026 says Amazon has quietly demolished. The complaint, lodged in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, does not concern a data breach or a leaked database or a rogue employee. It concerns a feature that works exactly as designed. And what it was designed to do, the lawsuit argues, is take a mathematical print of the face of every person who walks past a Ring camera, whether or not that person has ever heard of the feature, whether or not they consented, whether or not they will ever know it happened.
The feature is called Familiar Faces. Amazon's Ring subsidiary announced it in September 2025 and began rolling it out to doorbell owners across the United States on 9 December 2025. The pitch is the kind of mild convenience that has carried surveillance technology into the home for a decade: instead of a generic alert telling you that motion has been detected at your front door, your phone now tells you who is there. You tag the people who come and go, up to fifty of them, and the system learns to recognise them, greeting your partner, your neighbour, your regular delivery driver by name on the screen in your hand.
To do that, the system has to do something more consequential than its marketing suggests. To decide whether the person at the door is the person you tagged, it has to scan the face of everyone who appears in the camera's field of view, extract a faceprint from each one, and compare it against the saved set. As the Electronic Frontier Foundation explained in a November 2025 analysis written by its staff attorney Mario Trujillo, a faceprint is produced by “taking tiny measurements of your face and converting that into a series of numbers that is saved for later.” That string of numbers, derived from the geometry of a stranger's face, is processed and stored on Amazon's servers. Ring's own support materials describe a retention regime in which unnamed profiles are removed after thirty days without a further sighting and all facial-recognition information is deleted after a hundred and eighty days of no recognition. The lawsuit's contention is brutally simple: every person who walks into frame, the postal worker, the canvasser, the child selling biscuits, the neighbour cutting across the lawn, the stranger merely passing on the pavement, is scanned, measured and stored without ever being asked.
The man bringing the case is Charles Sigwalt, a Virginia resident who has never owned a Ring device. That detail is the entire architecture of the argument. Sigwalt is not a customer complaining about a product he bought. He is, on his own account, a passer-by, someone whose face was captured and stored while he visited friends and family whose doorbells happened to have Familiar Faces switched on. He represents a proposed nationwide class defined, in the complaint, as everyone in the United States whose facial-recognition data was collected, retained or used by the feature within the relevant statutory period, with a Virginia subclass for residents of his own state. The reporting on the filing describes a class that “could include thousands or millions of people,” and the complaint itself seeks damages exceeding the five-million-dollar threshold that anchors a federal class action of this kind.
The legal theories are an instructive patchwork, because they reveal how poorly the existing law fits the harm. Sigwalt's complaint leans on Virginia consumer-protection law, Virginia's appropriation statute, the Virginia Computer Crimes Act, the common-law tort of intrusion upon seclusion, negligence and unjust enrichment. It also invokes, by way of contrast, the biometric-privacy regimes of the three jurisdictions from which Amazon has conspicuously withheld the feature: Illinois, Texas and Portland, Oregon. That contrast is the rhetorical heart of the case. Familiar Faces is simply not available in those three places, and the complaint argues that this selective deployment proves Amazon “clearly has the ability to follow biometric privacy laws” and chooses, everywhere else, not to. As the filing puts it, the rest of the country does not get the same respect.
It is worth dwelling on how strange this is as a matter of corporate behaviour. A company that genuinely believed its feature was lawful and benign would not need to draw a map of the United States and carve three holes in it. Amazon drew exactly that map. The holes are not random. They correspond precisely to the places where collecting a stranger's faceprint without consent carries a defined, expensive and well-litigated legal penalty. Everywhere the penalty is uncertain, the scanning proceeds. The map is, in effect, a confession rendered in geography: a demonstration that the company knows precisely what consent-based biometric law requires, possesses the technical capacity to comply with it, and has decided that compliance is something it owes only to residents of jurisdictions that thought to legislate.
To understand the map, you have to understand the three laws that drew it, because each represents a different answer to the same question and together they form the entire functioning edifice of American biometric protection.
Illinois passed the Biometric Information Privacy Act in 2008. BIPA is, by some distance, the most consequential privacy statute in the United States, and it owes that status to a single design choice: it gives ordinary people a private right of action. Under BIPA, a private entity may not collect a person's biometric identifier, a faceprint emphatically included, without first informing them in writing, explaining the purpose and duration of the collection, and obtaining written consent. Crucially, an individual whose rights are violated can sue on their own behalf and recover statutory damages, between one thousand and five thousand dollars per violation, without having to prove they suffered any concrete downstream injury. That feature turned BIPA into a machine for accountability. It is why Facebook agreed in 2020 to pay six hundred and fifty million dollars to settle claims that its photo-tagging tool extracted faceprints from Illinois users without consent, a settlement approved by Judge James Donato in the Northern District of California in February 2021 and described at the time as one of the largest privacy settlements in history. Eligible class members received cheques averaging around three hundred and ninety-seven dollars. The number that mattered to every other company watching was the total.
Texas takes a different route to a similar end. Its Capture or Use of Biometric Identifier statute, known as CUBI, also prohibits capturing a person's biometric identifier for a commercial purpose without consent, but it reserves enforcement to the state attorney general rather than to individuals. For years that made CUBI look toothless, a law on the books that nobody enforced. Then the office of Attorney General Ken Paxton began to wield it, and the results were staggering. In May 2025, Texas announced a one-billion-three-hundred-and-seventy-five-million-dollar settlement with Google to resolve allegations that the company had unlawfully collected Texans' biometric data, including face geometry, through products such as Google Photos and the Nest line of cameras, capturing, as the EFF later put it, the face geometry of any Texan who happened to come into view, including non-users. Separately, Meta agreed to pay Texas one billion four hundred million dollars over comparable claims. These are not nuisance settlements. They are among the largest privacy recoveries any government has ever secured, and they were secured under a state law that simply says a company may not take your biometric identity without asking.
Portland, Oregon, supplies the third and most categorical model. In September 2020 the city council voted unanimously to pass what was then the first ordinance in the United States to ban private entities from using facial-recognition technology in places of public accommodation. The ban took effect on 1 January 2021. Portland did not bother with the consent framework at all. It concluded that, in the spaces where members of the public have no real choice about being present, the technology should simply not operate. The ordinance was animated explicitly by concerns about over-surveillance, opacity, and the gender and racial bias documented in facial-recognition systems, and it represents the position that some uses of the technology are not a matter for negotiated consent but a line that should not be crossed.
Three jurisdictions, three philosophies: a private right to sue, an empowered public enforcer, an outright prohibition. What they share is that each one attaches a real and predictable cost to scanning a non-consenting face. Familiar Faces stops at all three borders. Everywhere else in America, the cost is still being litigated, and Amazon has decided to keep scanning until a court tells it the price.
None of this is happening in a vacuum, and the institutional memory matters, because Ring is not a neutral newcomer stumbling into a privacy question for the first time. It is a company with a documented history of treating the cameras in people's homes as instruments whose reach exceeds their owners' understanding.
In May 2023 the Federal Trade Commission charged Ring with a litany of failures and extracted a settlement requiring it to pay five million eight hundred thousand dollars in consumer refunds. The agency's complaint was lurid. It alleged that Ring had given employees and hundreds of third-party contractors unfettered access to customers' private video feeds, including footage from cameras in bedrooms and children's bedrooms, with the ability to download, view and share those recordings at will. It alleged that lax security allowed hackers to seize control of more than fifty-five thousand US customers' accounts and cameras between early 2019 and 2020. The order forced Ring to build a privacy programme, impose multi-factor authentication, and submit to novel safeguards on human review of video. The episode established a pattern that the Familiar Faces dispute now echoes: a product sold as personal security, operating in practice as something with a far wider and less consensual gaze than its buyers imagined.
Ring's entanglement with policing deepens the picture. For years the company's Neighbors app and its earlier footage-request features functioned as a soft channel through which law-enforcement agencies could solicit video from a vast distributed network of private cameras, a quasi-public surveillance grid assembled from doorbells. In October 2025 Ring announced a partnership with Flock Safety that would let police request footage through Community Requests in the Neighbors app, integrating Ring's cameras into a network already controversial for its automated licence-plate readers. After a public backlash, Ring announced on 12 February 2026 that it was cancelling the Flock partnership following a comprehensive review, saying the integration would require more time and resources than anticipated. The reversal was a pattern in miniature: deploy an expansion of surveillance, weather the criticism, retreat only when the cost becomes visible. Familiar Faces is the same manoeuvre at the scale of the human face itself.
What distinguishes the Familiar Faces episode from an inadvertent overreach is that the objections were registered, loudly and specifically, before the feature ever shipped. This was not a case of a company surprised by an outcome nobody foresaw. The outcome was foreseen, in writing, by some of the most credible privacy voices in the country, and the feature launched anyway.
The EFF's November 2025 analysis was unambiguous. It walked through the mechanics of how a faceprint is taken and stored, identified the population of non-consenting bystanders the feature would inevitably sweep up, and named the legal precedents, the Google and Facebook settlements, that mapped the exposure with precision. Trujillo's warning went beyond the immediate function to the deeper structural danger: a system built to recognise a friend at the front door, he argued, can be repurposed tomorrow for mass surveillance, because the infrastructure, the cameras, the faceprints, the servers, the matching, is identical regardless of the use to which it is put. The capability is the risk. Once tens of millions of doorbells can extract and compare faceprints, the question of what that capability is pointed at becomes a matter of policy, configuration and corporate discretion rather than engineering.
The political warning was just as explicit. Senator Ed Markey of Massachusetts, a member of the Senate Commerce Committee with a long record of scrutinising Ring, wrote to Amazon's chief executive Andrew Jassy on 31 October 2025, demanding that the company abandon its plan to embed facial recognition in Ring doorbells. In response, Markey's office reported, Amazon revealed something telling: that Ring's privacy protections apply only to device owners, not to the members of the public who appear in front of the cameras. That admission is the whole problem stated in a single sentence. The protections run to the customer. The faces belong to everyone else. When a Super Bowl advertisement showcased the technology in early 2026, Markey wrote again, on 11 February 2026, repeating his call for Amazon to discontinue the feature. The company did not.
This is the sequence that gives the lawsuit its moral force. A regulator-adjacent senator warned. A leading civil-liberties organisation warned. The company's own response confirmed that non-users were unprotected. The relevant precedents were already measured in the billions. And the feature shipped to the rest of the country regardless, with three holes cut neatly out of the map where the law had teeth.
Strip away the legal machinery and what remains is a question about consent that the home-security industry has spent a decade avoiding. The Ring camera is bought, installed and configured by a homeowner for the homeowner's purposes. Every consent that exists in the transaction belongs to that one person. But the camera does not point inward at the person who consented. It points outward, at the street, at the pavement, at the approach to the door, at precisely the space through which other people, who consented to nothing, are obliged to pass.
This is the structural inversion at the centre of the Familiar Faces dispute, and it is what makes the ordinary frameworks of consumer privacy inadequate to it. In the standard model, a user agrees to a product's terms and accepts the trade-offs; if they dislike the bargain, they can decline the product. The delivery driver carrying a parcel up the path has no such option. They cannot read Amazon's terms of service. They cannot toggle a setting. They cannot decline to have their face measured, because declining would mean declining to do their job, or declining to visit their friend, or declining to walk down a public street. Their biometric identity is taken as a condition of their physical presence in the world, and there is no interface through which they could ever have said no.
The numbers turn this from a thought experiment into an infrastructure. Ring is the dominant brand in a market that has saturated American residential life; industry analyses place it at the top of the smart-doorbell category, with millions of active units across US households and smart cameras present in roughly a third of American internet homes. When a single company's outward-facing cameras number in the tens of millions and each one is capable of extracting faceprints, the aggregate is not a collection of private security decisions. It is a distributed biometric sensor network blanketing the residential landscape, assembled house by house, consent by individual consent, into a system that no individual consented to and that surveils, overwhelmingly, people who are not its customers. The lawsuit's phrase for the result, an involuntary biometric database of non-users, is not rhetorical excess. It is an accurate description of what tens of millions of consenting installations produce when their gaze is pooled.
The defenders of Familiar Faces will say, correctly, that the current use is narrow. The feature tells a homeowner who is at the door. The faceprints of strangers are, by Ring's account, discarded within months if they are not matched. Nobody is being tracked across the city. No central index of every passer-by is being compiled and sold. All of that is, for now, true. And all of it misses the point that the EFF and Markey were pressing, which is not about what the system does today but about what the existence of the system makes possible tomorrow.
Consider the components that Familiar Faces requires in order to function at all. It requires cameras at scale, which now exist. It requires the capacity to extract a faceprint from any face that appears, which is the core function. It requires servers that process and store those faceprints, which Amazon operates. It requires a matching engine that compares a new face against a stored set, which is the whole feature. Every one of these components is precisely what a mass-surveillance system needs. The only thing standing between a doorbell that greets your neighbour by name and a network that can locate a specific individual across tens of millions of cameras is a policy decision about how the matching is scoped, and policy decisions can change. They can change because a company updates its terms. They can change because a government compels access, as Ring's history of police entanglement makes far from hypothetical. They can change because a feature is quietly expanded, the way Familiar Faces itself was added to cameras that buyers had installed for an entirely different purpose.
The relevant precedent here is not a privacy abstraction but the recurring lesson of Ring's own conduct: capabilities built for a benign stated purpose tend to find broader application, and the public usually learns about the broader application after the fact. The cameras were sold for parcel theft and they became a police network. The footage was meant for owners and contractors in Ukraine were watching bedrooms. The faceprints are taken to recognise friends, and the question the lawsuit forces is what guarantees, if any, prevent them from one day being used to recognise anyone. The honest answer, under the current legal regime in forty-seven states and most cities, is almost none. There is no general federal biometric-privacy law. Outside Illinois, Texas, Portland and a handful of states with comprehensive privacy statutes, the meaningful limits on how a stranger's faceprint may be used, by whom, and for how long are whatever a company writes into a policy it can revise at will.
It is tempting to read the billion-dollar settlements as evidence that the system works, that companies which over-collect biometric data eventually pay, and that the prospect of paying will deter the next firm. The Familiar Faces case is the strongest available evidence that this reading is wrong, because Amazon launched the feature in full view of those very settlements. Google's one-billion-three-hundred-and-seventy-five-million-dollar payment to Texas and Facebook's six-hundred-and-fifty-million-dollar BIPA settlement were not obscure. They were the most prominent biometric-privacy outcomes in the country, and Amazon's own engineers and lawyers plainly knew them well enough to draw the exclusion map. The settlements did not deter the conduct. They merely defined the three zones in which the conduct would be too expensive to attempt.
This is the deep inadequacy of an enforcement model that operates only after the harm, and only where a legislature happened to act in advance. The settlements are vast, but they arrive years after the faceprints were taken, they reach only the jurisdictions with the right statute, and they treat the violation as a cost to be priced rather than a line not to be crossed. For the company, a settlement is a known business expense, payable from the revenue the feature generated in the interim, and discharged without any admission that the underlying conduct was wrong. Google paid Texas its one-and-a-third billion dollars without acknowledging any violation and without being required to change its products. A penalty that can be absorbed, that is confined to a few states, and that need not alter the behaviour going forward is not a constraint on surveillance. It is a tariff on it, and a tariff that most of the country does not even charge.
The reactive model also places the entire burden on the surveilled. To vindicate his rights, a person like Sigwalt must discover that his face was scanned, a thing he was specifically never told, retain lawyers, identify a viable legal theory among the patchwork of state torts and statutes, and litigate against one of the largest companies on earth, all to establish a principle that should never have required litigation: that you may not take a stranger's biometric identity without asking. The default is surveillance, and the only available remedy is an expensive, years-long, after-the-fact lawsuit to claw a fraction of dignity back. Reversing that default is the whole challenge, and it is not primarily a technical one.
The question the Familiar Faces case ultimately poses is the one its plaintiff's exclusion-map argument answers by implication: what would it take for the default to be consent rather than surveillance? The Illinois, Texas and Portland carve-outs prove that consent-by-default is achievable, because Amazon already achieves it for tens of millions of people. The task is to make the protection those residents enjoy the floor for everyone, and the components are visible, scattered across the very jurisdictions whose patchwork currently frustrates a coherent answer.
The first requirement is a private right of action grounded in personhood, not purchase. BIPA's defining feature is that the person whose face was taken can sue, and can recover statutory damages without proving a separate downstream loss. That single design choice is what gives the law its bite, because it does not ask the surveilled to quantify a harm that is inherently dignitary, the harm of having your biometric identity seized by a stranger. A federal biometric-privacy law built on that model would do what no settlement can: make the taking itself actionable everywhere, by the people it is taken from, rather than only in the three places that legislated first.
The second requirement is that consent must come from the person whose biometric data is collected, not from the person who bought the device. The entire conceptual error of the current arrangement is that it treats the homeowner's consent as covering the faces the homeowner's camera captures. It does not, and cannot, because those faces belong to other people. A meaningful framework would recognise that the relevant consenting party is the data subject, the person whose face is measured, and that no purchase, no terms of service and no household setting can supply consent on a stranger's behalf. Where obtaining that consent is impossible, as it is for a passer-by on a public pavement, the Portland answer, that the scanning simply should not happen, becomes not an extreme position but the only coherent one.
The third requirement is strict limits on retention and repurposing, written into law rather than policy. The danger of a faceprint database is not exhausted by its first use; it is latent in its existence. A framework adequate to the threat would mandate the minimum retention necessary for any consented function, prohibit the use of biometric data collected for one purpose in the service of another, and bar the kind of capability creep, from recognising a friend to locating a stranger, that the architecture makes trivially easy. It would also confront the policing question directly, foreclosing the quiet conversion of a private camera network into a public surveillance grid that Ring's own history shows is no abstraction.
The fourth requirement is that compliance must not be optional based on geography. The exclusion map is the lawsuit's smoking gun precisely because it demonstrates that selective compliance is a choice. A company able to switch a feature off at the Illinois and Texas borders is able to switch it off everywhere, and a legal regime worth the name would remove the incentive to draw such maps at all by making the strongest available protection national. The current arrangement effectively rewards the country for its legislative gaps, granting Amazon free rein everywhere a state failed to act. A federal floor would convert those gaps from commercial opportunities into the protections they should always have been.
There is a temptation, encountered in every privacy debate of the past two decades, to treat the loss as already complete and the resistance as quaint. The cameras are everywhere; the faceprints are already taken; the database, involuntary or not, already exists. Why fight a war that is over? The answer is that the war is not over, and the exclusion map is the proof. In Illinois, in Texas, in Portland, the war was fought before the technology arrived, and it was won, and the result is that the residents of those places walk past Ring cameras every day without having a faceprint extracted from them. They were not protected by accident. They were protected because a legislature decided, in advance, that a person's biometric identity is not a thing a company may take simply because its camera can see a face.
What the Familiar Faces lawsuit asks the rest of the country to decide is whether that protection is a regional privilege or a human baseline. The stakes are easy to understate, because the immediate harm is invisible. Nobody is arrested. Nobody is denied a loan. A faceprint is taken, stored, and in most cases deleted within months, and the person it was taken from feels nothing and knows nothing. But the absence of a felt injury is exactly what makes the precedent so corrosive. We are being asked to accept, quietly and without ever having been consulted, that the act of walking through public space now generates a biometric record held by a private company, and that the only people exempt are those whose local governments thought to forbid it. The default has shifted from anonymity to identification, and the shift happened not through legislation or public deliberation but through a software update pushed to cameras that people had bought for a different reason.
Charles Sigwalt's lawsuit may succeed or it may fail; the patchwork of Virginia torts it relies on is a fragile substitute for the clean biometric statute the rest of the country lacks. But its central insight does not depend on the verdict. Amazon has already told us, by where it declined to deploy, that consent-based biometric privacy is technically and commercially feasible, that the company can honour it when a law requires, and that it will withhold it wherever a law does not. The only remaining question is who deserves the protection that Illinois, Texas and Portland already guarantee. The honest answer is that a person's face should not be a thing that any company is entitled to measure and keep merely because that person had the temerity to walk down a street. Making that the default, everywhere and for everyone, is the unfinished work the doorbell has forced into view.

Tim Green UK-based Systems Theorist & Independent Technology Writer
Tim explores the intersections of artificial intelligence, decentralised cognition, and posthuman ethics. His work, published at smarterarticles.co.uk, challenges dominant narratives of technological progress while proposing interdisciplinary frameworks for collective intelligence and digital stewardship.
His writing has been featured on Ground News and shared by independent researchers across both academic and technological communities.
ORCID: 0009-0002-0156-9795 Email: tim@smarterarticles.co.uk
Listen to the free weekly SmarterArticles Podcast
from Nightjar
Each morning, Enid stepped outside onto her little weathered porch, greeted the dawn with the juncos, finches, and, on fortunate days, a flock of waxwings.
Enid's ample body bore marks: past addictions, a desperate need for approval, and a string of tragedies in her family that she and her sister called the Oser family curse. Those burdens had faded now. When she did laugh, it was because she was caught off guard by someone’s quip, and she would belly laugh, especially if it was absurd or dirty or mean. For example, when reading Annie Dillard’s Teaching a Stone to Talk, she laughed for a solid 10 minutes when she read what nineteenth century Arctic explorers brought with them on their expeditions: “With the two skeletons were some chocolate, some guns, some tea and a great deal of table silver.”
Enid also found solace in shedding things, as if each giveaway erased a little more. And though she had said goodbye to her physical beauty, she kept the holes in her ears for no other reason than she liked colorful stones. If Shakespeare had written about her, he would have said she was as civil as an orange. “The count is neither sad, nor sick, nor merry, nor well.”
Enid liked to walk her dogs on the steep hills of her hometown. It was a maze of nothing interesting, though she liked the changing landscape – mostly roses and sycamores and flowering plants. On a day she walked down a large steep street, she noticed the unusual architecture of a house midway down. Mid-century…or before? No, it must be Art Deco, its top floor curved around to the left, with opaque glass making the same path along the curve. She thought it pretty, and said so to the owner who was standing outside. His dress reminded her of Robin Williams in the movie Insomnia; pressed slacks, shirt, cardigan, like he had been dropped in from the 1950s, his gold-rimmed glasses the size of small apples. They chatted a bit, and he said next time she was around, he would show her inside. Ok, sounds good, she said, a slight horror rising from the hairs on her neck.
She returned days later without the dogs. She didn’t know if it was out of politeness, curiosity, or a strange compulsion – the house wasn’t all that interesting, but maybe there was some history in it. And though her spidey sense was heightened, a certain gullibility remained, an unfounded belief in the goodness of others, even when a familiar dread crept in. She likened this to Charlie Brown repeatedly trying to kick the football Lucy was holding, where hope met inevitable letdown. Like the other day a neighbor she had just met a few moments before asked her to pick up a package (would you be a doll?) that was arriving soon; they would be out of town. Two thoughts were there: that she couldn’t remember the last time she went somewhere, and why the hell was it ok for them to ask.
Enid entered his house and immediately sensed the colors. The home’s interior was painted in Hydrangea blue and a deep brown – stately – quite lovely in fact. The furniture was all curves and all angles and she was struck by the lack of personality in the room, almost as if it was staged. They didn’t talk much as she looked around. George – was it?
After they talked about the furniture, the weather, George asked if she wanted to see downstairs. Enid looked to her right and saw the narrowing staircase leading down and curving to the left. A basement? Immediately her mind went to the front door behind her. Did he lock it? She looked out his window, it was bright out but very dark in the room, the aura not unlike when one is day drinking in a bar.
Sure, lead the way. But instead he held out his left hand and offered to let her go ahead. This she knew was stupid and in a stroke of agency she said, no, I’ll follow you.
And then she thought about death, which she did most days. Death came to see her as the sun would begin to set, settling in her stomach like a tired but insistent weed. Death didn’t used to be there, but he started to land in her body after her brother hung himself from his garage just six years ago, his wife vomiting on the lawn, his son pulling him down, blinded by tears. No matter. This feeling, not the memory, was more interesting. It was just a jumping off point, like the chair.
They wound down the stairs, her marking how steep and narrow the passage was. Not many steps, but precarious.
And then she saw them. The dolls. They were all lined up above a low cabinet, and were the kind one’s aunt would collect – varying sizes of baby dolls, mostly girls. Nearly bald, bodies patchy, cracked and worn, they stared back at her. Why the dolls, she stuttered in what was less of a question and more of a disquieting utterance.
They were my mother’s.
The room got very small. Fog appeared on either side of her peripheral vision, her pupils, pinheads. If she ran up the stairs, he seemed strong enough to pull her back down. If he led the way again, and he got to some door, any door, he could lock it. She stared at the dolls, nearly resigned, then back at George.
There was something about the dolls. Their hair, it seemed wrong, somehow. In the dimly lit room, without her glasses, she thought they had human hair, placed clumsily on their hard plastic heads. And on one doll, the little Latina in a dress covered in cherries, the light was such that she imagined the red fruit was blood. But what struck her most was how unanimated they were, like her, frozen there.
She ran. Just a few steps to the first stair up and she expected him to be on her, but he didn’t make a move from his chair in the corner of the basement. Instead, as she bolted, he eventually rose and slowly followed behind. Calculating, as a lion, she thought in haste.
She reached the landing, tripped on the corner of the Marion Dorn rug, catching herself on flat palms. She leapt up, grabbed the front door knob – it was open. She ran down the small porch stairs and back up the steep street, grateful for how bright the sun shone.
#shortstory
from Nightjar
Townes wrote that a man once said to him “I want to be helped, but not at the cost of compulsory association with others seeking help. I know that to be thrown into unavoidable contact with those worse than myself would hopelessly degrade me. I should not be willing to risk that, no matter how much good the treatment might do me.”
As I started to take my addiction seriously, I joined multiple online support groups, attended a few in person, read the proverbial “quit lit.” Another brother, Brian, died when he was hit by a car, in 2002.
The sufferers, I concluded, didn’t want support, we wanted one of three things: someone to see us, a platform for our solipsism, and someone to fix us. Behind every heavy sigh in whatever flavor of group I signed up for there was an addiction to not doing the work, staying stuck. This took the form of either the male comedian, or the man who likes to tell stories about the worst thing they did while drunk, dominating the meeting with their war stories as other men puffed up their chests in solidarity.
Or, the women sat idly by and watched the show, unless they could find a women-only group. “Self-care” is the thru line there, and for those who can afford the higher end of these groups still get the same messaging, just packaged differently. Take care of yourself, set boundaries, keep coming back to this site, buy this book and if you need more support that will be extra. As of late, many doctors have got on board and partnered with these pop-up sites to prescribe Antabuse, Naltrexone, and the other opioid antagonists with little oversight. But if you don’t have access to what you really need, to be seen, understood, you’ll just stop taking the antagonists and keep drinking. Dennis Lehane writes in Shutter Island “…someday, we’ll medicate human experience right out of the human experience.”
The most helpful thing I ever learned would come years later when someone just simply said to me “you are the master of your own ship.” It flipped a switch for me.
But I drank for decades more. My last brother, David, died by hanging in 2019.
I always thought it would be my breasts that would defect first, but it was my heart. After days of abuse, my mouth would open as a hollow, and my heart, fierce but helpless, pumped like a fist against a locked door.
At the end of my suffering
there was a door.
…
You who do not remember
passage from the other world
I tell you I could speak again: whatever
returns from oblivion returns
to find a voice:
Louise Glück, from the poem “The Wild Iris”
#addictionessay
from Nightjar
The Tuesday before she rammed her mini cooper into a house in Mar Vista, California, the actor Anne Heche was co-hosting her podcast Better Together, and in the available (albeit probably bootlegged) recordings of the podcast, you can clearly hear that she is intoxicated and slurring her speech. Usually, I just move on to getting my dopamine hits in other bad news, but this one piqued my interest because she was my age.
I know all too well how days like this go: if you’ve been addicted for a long time, and if you start day-drinking on an empty stomach, you don’t stop at the end of the day. I, too, sans the vodka (my devils were beer and wine), would get started early and it would morph late into the evening, and then to maintain body and mind homeostasis the next day, I would drink to feel normal, and then ethanol’s addictiveness would cause me to drink more. Anne was probably in menopause at the time of her death, and that coupled with the PTSD she suffered from childhood trauma was a poorly mixed cocktail. The night sweats from hormonal changes, drinking, and her more than likely trying to stay relevant in an unforgiving occupation for the aging, would cause anyone to want to heavily dissociate. Ms. Heche more than likely didn’t learn how to self-regulate, and, as Holly Whitaker wrote in Quit Like a Woman, she had to “manage it with a jackhammer at the end of the day.” When she tore down that street, it was a race to get away from herself, knowing full-well she could no longer manage the endless work of being a woman.
The same year we scraped Craig off the tracks, I graduated university and went to Greece with my friend, Loreen. My relentless gym regiment had begun to wane, and I had dabbled a little in cocaine before the trip, but nothing full-blown yet. We had a stopover in England, then we traveled to Athens, ferried to San Torini, to Paros, then Mykonos. As we made our way up the Aegean, the riskier my behavior got. On Paros, I slept with an uncircumcised waiter. Drinking games after hours. Big, big moons. One night, Loreen got frustrated with me and walked back to our hotel in an island blackout. Selfish, I stayed behind and picked up a Greek man.
We walked out on a rocky pier…he tried to seduce me…it gets fuzzy from there. But I’ll never forget a base fear, like if I give in, I’ll be dead. He continued to plead. I stayed and listened. I knew I wouldn’t go with him, but it was at this point I was firmly entrenched in a kind of learned helplessness. I left him at the pier.
Why do we put ourselves in harm’s way?
In Alain de Botton’s May 2016 New York Times article “Why You Will Marry the Wrong Person,” he writes:
“What we really seek is familiarity — which may well complicate any plans we might have had for happiness. We are looking to recreate, within our adult relationships, the feelings we knew so well in childhood. The love most of us will have tasted early on was often confused with other, more destructive dynamics: feelings of wanting to help an adult who was out of control, of being deprived of a parent’s warmth or scared of his anger, of not feeling secure enough to communicate our wishes. How logical, then, that we should as grown-ups find ourselves rejecting certain candidates for marriage not because they are wrong but because they are too right — too balanced, mature, understanding, and reliable — given that in our hearts, such rightness feels foreign.”
Happily, buzzed, I walked toward that man because I wanted to connect. What started to build was a need to attach, an attachment to men who had…I mean…I wanted inside them. I wanted to be them. Women, too. I didn’t want to be like them, or take on their clothes or affects, it was more physically haunting, like when a bird sticks its beak in your ear and doesn’t bite, but trills. I settled on those who wanted me for use. Me as them, I think, is worth digging into, as I saw something in them that was me, that I wanted back. I lived alongside them, stared at them through mirrors or windows or all the untoward ways we intrude on others. But mostly I sat outside them, crazy to find my way back to anything that looked like me, something I had lost.
#addictionessay
from Nightjar
A half mile from home, up in a quiet neighborhood, I sat in my GTI with a bottle of white. It didn’t matter the brand, the complaint was that it was getting warm, and I had to put it down every time a car drove by. It was the first time I had felt the proverbial rock bottom, but my addiction would continue to escalate for another ten years. I had a full-time job, no debt, a clean house. I had ticked the boxes. Hey, Cs get degrees.
That bottle of white wasn’t my first vacation, and my amygdala wanted out before I did, tired of its job. Yet I had submerged a helpful part of me in quicksand and poured rocket fuel down the hole. If you do find yourself in quicksand, lean back, getting out takes a long time. It’s a lot of spiraling, one way or the other, until you loosen quicksand’s hold. The only danger is the incoming tide that never relents, and at its center is overwhelm.
House cleaning got more urgent the worse my habituation. After a multi-day binge, I would get out of bed like I was shot out of a cannon. I moved around the house like I was dodging bullets, running from one end of the house to the other like I was trying to hide. Every lick of clothing was washed and put away. Gone, temporarily, were the shame and night sweats from the sheets. Still legless, I walked the dog, holiday heart pounding and inflammation so extreme it crept into my lower back and strained my lungs. Then I would bathe, wax my upper lip, tear that dead toenail off. If I can just put my house in order, I’ll be in order, too. Exhausted, breathless, and bereft of meaning, I had to sit with myself.
Thomas Roethke writes in his poem “Prognosis,”
The scheme without purpose; pride in a furnished room; The mediocre busy at betraying Themselves, their parlors musty as a funeral home.
Charles B. Towns, who conducted experimentation with cures for alcoholism and drug addiction and drafted drug control legislation in the early 20th century, writes in his 1915 book Habits that Handicap: The Menace of Opium, Alcohol, and Tobacco, and the Remedy, “A far greater number of its victims than the offhand moralist is included to concede have admiral sturdiness of will and dogged persistence.” He continues: “They are alcoholics because with the help of stimulants they have habitually forced themselves to overwork, to bear burdens of responsibility beyond their normal strength, or to overcome physical obstacles, like poor health, eyestrain, and insufficient nourishment. The man who drinks is not necessarily depraved; but under the influence of [a] stimulant he is very likely to drift into associations and environments which will lower his standards until he becomes irresponsible, unadmirable, or even criminal.”
When my late mother was overwhelmed, she would go to a bar. Sometimes, she would abandon dogs we had adopted on the side of a road. Wanting responsibility to be no longer there, abandoning situations where you were always the responsible one, is tricky. You start out in loving service, then it defines you, and then it leads to a loss of self.
I’ve left my family out of this; they are all dead. Sure, there are a few stragglers: a leftover sister, a widowed sister-in-law and her spawn, a Mormon cousin – a love child of my uncle’s. Working through your past is not an archeological dig, nor is it linear, the chaos already in full swing before I got here. One fun tale involved my mother, at the time living in Alaska with five kids on a school bus, punching a middle school kid who was bullying my brother. My father spent his time shooting horse and playing cards with Jimmie Angel. Everyone drank, smoked pot, smoked. Died. I was born when everything had lost its color. I arrived at the wedding only to find out it was one long, drawn out wake.
In early 1994, my brother Craig stepped in front of a train. They say he was already on those tracks, walking his 10-speed, ZZ Top on 11. His pants, I’m sure, were far down below his waistline. As I write this, I see him walking away from me, gait like a quick upright duck. And I still imagine his mangled corpse, bike wrapped around his body in a metal hug, sweat and blood and dirt caking his full Irish beard. Around the train, the dirt is an oxidized orange, the manzanita is sparse. I only imagine this.
There was relief, as I had taught myself to stop loving long before. In 1990, my sister had been found down a mountain in Washington state, holes in her back, stuffed in a sleeping bag that by chance had held out its soft nylon to a tree branch so she could be found. I became addicted to exercise, sometimes spending an hour or more every day at the gym or on epic hikes in sweltering heat, my groin complaining with the arrival of the blue devil (depression).
How did I not see the hole? How long before I stopped seeing the horizon, any horizon? The exercise addiction was the first attempt to escape. My monkey then morphed into a brief love affair with cocaine. Combing for rocks in the shag and playing all-night Tetris in a basement at twenty-eight, I found out quite by accident that I could drink to get to sleep.
#addictionessay
from Nightjar
If you saw Patricia Highsmith, author of The Talented Mr. Ripley, or Susan Sontag, author of several essays and books, namely On Photography and Regarding the Pain of Others, interviewed side-by-side, you would be struck by how similar they look. Both had wild, thick black hair, and though Highsmith had grey eyes, sometimes described as purple, Sontag’s were dark brown and had a searching quality to them.
In most interviews Highsmith looks uncomfortable, arms crossed. She says interviews bore the author, make the whole thing vulgar. Her second-person use is telling, and though I can’t claim that all high minds speak in this way, keeping the conversation outside oneself is a way of keeping the world at bay, and the inner world protected. Having conversations in one’s head is safer; creativity is a way of dissociating.
With Sontag, her manner is incredulous towards her interviewers, unless it’s someone she respects, such as John Berger. In their sit-down on storytelling from 1983, she appears alert, beyond his equal, so her mannerism is one of playing against a competitor. But as Berger begins to speak, you realize this mannerism could be because he works at being clever, and she’s trying to track him like a cat. He’s obtuse; Sontag is clear.
Both women died in their seventies. Cancer. Long illness. The cost of being wound so tight. It’s not a protective experience – makes one perpetually freaked out, as if you’re going to crawl out of your skin. That monster, unable to express itself fully, makes you ill. You arise exhausted, then begin to quest again. This is a feeling of never being at home.
Do not trust anguish; it is without function. ~Thomas McGrath
#fragments
from The disconnect blog
This is a basic writeup on solar systems. First off I’d like to share my basic mentality on the subject. After the philosophical mentalities we’ll go into common terminology and some components. We’ll end with an example configuration with the majority of the needed components and prices at the time of this writing (2026). This is a reference and basic guide on ideas and principles I wish I knew before getting started. I’d recommend reading a book or three to get further understandings before you get going. If you don’t like reading too much, this document can get you started, but at least read the manuals to the components you buy and follow their instructions.
At this point it seems fairly silly to me to go “off-grid” and build a solar system if you do not want to change your lifestyle to some extent. Unless energy prices skyrocket, or you live in an area with very high prices, it does not seem worthwhile to build the massive solar panel arrays and the huge battery banks necessary to supply power to the typical household. The economy of it all just takes too long to pay off, in some cases it cannot pay for itself over time unless you stay tied to the grid as your primary battery bank – which is not off-grid and beyond the scope of this writeup. But if you can alter your lifestyle some and switch some things around you can go off-grid and save a lot of money. I recommend to people to go with 12 or 24 volt systems with 800-1600 watts or so in solar panels. If you can live with this, then you certainly should go off-grid and you will save a lot of money over time. It is so nice being able to produce your own energy with only a 5-20 year bill for new batteries vs a monthly bill to stream power from a third party company. To do such a thing with a relatively low upfront cost is a great thing.
The amount of wattage the solar panels generate depends on the time of day as the sun arcs through the sky, with midday being full strength. Our family is running on a 12V system with just over 1000 watts in solar panels, but our charge controller utilizes only 800 watts. This makes it so we get full strength wattage for more hours of the day which is nice. If you can go with 12V I highly recommend it. With 12V there are countless accessories to attach that are built for RV’s, boats, or cars since many of those run on 12V. With 24V there are also many RV and boat accessories as well, but not as many as you will find with 12V. Another option if you go with 24V is to get a DC-to-DC converter which can change the voltage to whatever you want (depending on the converter). So if you go 24V you can down drop to 12V for all of those neat low-priced attachments anyway, or if you are at 12V you can increase it to 24V or beyond. The converters are typically more efficient than an inverter bumping up to AC (alternate current, what a typical house uses for power) 120V and/or 240V. So consider this as an option if you want to build a very efficient system with minimal loss, which is pretty important with a smaller system like I’m recommending here.
It can still be worthwhile to go off-grid with a 48V system hitting something like 3200-5400 watts (give or take depending on charge controller capacity and your solar array). But your amortization will take quite a bit longer and in some instances it will not pay for itself over time. Today you can even get 72V systems, 600V systems, and beyond that but I do not recommend going this route and will not cover anything that helps you much in that direction. I also do not think it’s all that awesome to connect to the grid with a solar system. To me one of the primary points is to be more self reliant and discontinue your monthly bill. So I’d recommend going to other sources if your desire is to get a lot of panels and hook up to the grid as your battery, that isn’t a terrible idea in the city, but for rural folk I’d recommend pulling the grid plug. I had a friend who ended up spending well over $50,000 for their solar system and were still hooked up to the grid, but their monthly bill was very low, usually $0. This is a writeup to help people disconnect from the grid and live with less power overall to save money and be more self sufficient. Another smart option for those who stay connected to the grid is to just make a simple 12V side system. It will not run your whole house when the power is down but you could have an efficient chest freezer, charge batteries (laptops, power tools, phones, rechargeable lights etc.), run lighting, and more. This makes it so if the grid goes down for an extended time you aren’t completely incapacitated. Although this is not nearly as awesome as going off-grid in my view, it would be an intelligent thing to do for those who cannot take the leap away from the grid.
My wife and I are not experts in this. She mostly avoids it, but likes that I’ve dug in so we can utilize this tech and have some electricity in our life. We wanted to go off-grid for over a decade now but realized how challenging it would be. We had a house that had many high-power consumption appliances and it seemed almost impossible for us to afford the solar system needed to power that. So we started playing around with my father-in-law’s tool “Watts App Pro” to see what each appliance used for power. We started deciding what things we could get rid of and what we could keep. After analyzing all of it we calculated that it would take about an $8,000 to $12,000 system or so to get off-grid and stop our monthly bills. To do that we needed to replace some of the highest power draws. We were planning on getting rid of our electric water heater and switch to wood for winter and propane or oil for summer. We planned on swapping our electric stove for a propane one. Our refrigerator was already super efficient so that could stay. We were also thinking of getting rid of our big gaming computers and switch to laptops. As time went on we had an opportunity to move to a new place and build from scratch. This made it easier to plan from the ground up a more efficient setup. We now have a system that cost about $4,000 because we thought of it from the ground up, instead of adopting it to a house already built for us depending on electricity for so many things.
I’m no electrical expert. I was very nervous about this early on. I was almost ready to just opt into using one of those all-in-one systems that I wouldn’t have to think about. A solar panel, and a box of mystery that you plug the panel into and plug appliances into. But the problem with those is that it’s difficult to swap one component inside that box and they are way overpriced for what you get. Once the battery goes out you often need a new system – seems pretty silly. You may be able to swap batteries with some of them, but the ones I was looking at didn’t have that as an easy option. Note that the all-in-one systems I’m talking about here are not kits with all of the separate components needed. Sometimes those can be a good deal and worthwhile. I’d recommend, even if you are nervous like I was, to build a system from scratch. Don’t buy an all-in-one unit, you will spend more and have less control over it. Sure they are easy but you can figure this out. I did! And it was really a mystery to me until well after I built the system. It was actually running and working well before I learned all that much about it. I’d recommend reading a few books on the subject. I think you would be better off by doing so. I read the books listed at the bottom of this writeup after the system was up and running and I was pretty clueless. Point being, you can do this – but don’t do what I did – become a little more informed with this and read a book or three so you know what you are doing. Even with a 12V system you can hurt yourself or burn down a building. However, if you build the system following sound principles it is extremely safe. If you are going with a very large system it seems best to put the battery bank outside in a small insulated shed. This isn’t a terrible idea even if you go with a small system, so if the worst case happens it won’t burn your house down. I’m not saying this to scare you from switching to solar, just to be cautious. A little precaution can save you a lot of heartache. The grid burns down many houses as well, you aren’t safe just because you don’t go this route. Electricity can get hot and make fires especially when things short out. (Fuses and breakers help prevent this.)
To me the most important thing to those desiring to go off-grid is to prepare for a shift in lifestyle. This shift might be minor for some, and major for others. The most inefficient thing you can do with electricity is convert it into heat. Don’t think of your solar system as a heating system. The more you can avoid it as refrigeration and air conditioning the better as well. But it can do some of that if you find that a necessity. With a more robust solar system it might even be worthwhile to use it for heating and water heating for a dump to utilize excess wattage. But if you can go with a lower watt system you can save a lot of money and still have power to run many things. Our family has no refrigeration at this time. One of the main things I wanted early on was a solar system that can power a refrigerator and chest freezer, but after living without it for a while my wife and I agree those are totally overrated. We thought we had to have it for our cow’s milk, but it turns out that’s the worst thing you can do with raw milk for health benefits (read ‘Milk Into Cheese’ – by David Asher for details on this). We plan to make a root cellar (doubling as a cheese cave) and maybe an ice house someday if that isn’t enough. However right now we are doing fine so we’ll probably skip the ice house. We heat with wood and built with intelligent passive solar design to keep from needing air conditioning. A basic 12V ~800 watt system could easily run an efficient refrigerator, and window A/C unit if that is very important to you. However it could struggle if they aren’t very efficient. A larger 24V ~1600 watt system could run an efficient refrigerator, chest freezer, and a window air conditioner if that is what you care about. However if you can move away from refrigerators and freezers you can downsize your system and save a lot. We preserve a lot of our food with canning. That uses a burst of heat and some jars and then you are done – no more power needed. There are also cellars, fermentation, drying, salting, jellies, and other preservation methods available to store your foods. I think it very reasonable to have one efficient refrigerator for daily use and one efficient chest freezer for storing veggies and/or meats. You can also store a lot of meat through canning; it works especially well with ground meat – that is what we do.
If you can get away from using your solar system as a heat source you can get away with a much cheaper/smaller system. Get a wood, propane, or natural gas cookstove not electric. Skip the microwave (although even a basic 12V system could run one for short periods). Use wood or propane for space heating, not electric. Clothes dryers can use insane amounts of power, don’t bother with those. If you cannot live without one switch over to a propane version. You can dry clothes outside even in freezing winter temps, it just takes longer. I thought that was not true and insane when I first found out – so I tried it. Guess what, it works! My grandparents hung their clothes downstairs, air is an effective dryer and clothes last longer when they aren’t cooked in a dryer. Also consider getting rid of any old power hogs you may have around and upgrade to more efficient versions. Another option is to use a generator to supplement power for any big items you may use infrequently. This is a very common practice in the off-grid world, especially during cloudy weeks. You may want a generator to top off batteries mid winter with long overcast periods to keep your batteries healthy. We don’t need to because we have lowered our power use to a very low level, and you could to, but if you don’t that is an option.
Solar System Terminology With Some Basic Helpful Math Formulas
Ampere (amps): One ampere is equal to one coulomb of electrical charge per second. One coulomb is equal to about 6.241x1018 electrons passing through a single point in the circuit each second. If that is as abstract to you as it is to me then welcome to the party. The basic thing I understand is that amps are a measurement of current. It’s easier to me to think of it as flow. Even though it isn’t really a direct correlation it is similar or a metaphor thinking of it as the flow of water through a pipe (wires). If the pipe is huge a lot of water can flow through (current) even with low pressure (voltage), and it if it very narrow only a small amount can flow at a time. Realize this is not exactly what is going on because physics are very strange, but this concept can help you to make a functional system. The more amps going through the wire, the thicker that wire has to be. If your wire is too narrow it will heat up and can start a fire (larger wires and fuses can fix this potential problem). The higher the amps the shorter you want that wire to be. If you need a very long run of wire it is helpful to increase the voltage and decrease the amperage – that is why AC power became the norm in the economy of the world. With DC typically you have lower voltage and higher amps. With that it is very useful for small scale home and shop situations, but if you want to capitalize with maximum profits from central energy cartels you want to distribute power over long distances. To run long distance you want lower amps and higher volts which favors the AC systems. So when you build your solar system you want to keep the majority of your DC components, especially the high amp ones, as close as possible.
Volts: One volt is the potential difference between two points as one joule of energy is expended per one coulomb of charge moving between them… In other words it is the potential difference across a conductor carrying a constant current of one ampere that dissipates one watt of power… In other words pasture-raised sheep cheeseburgers are equal to the circumference of the yumminess contained outside the realm of possibilities when fluctuated flatulently into the multiverse multiplicated quantumly bounced from point to point and back again. Are you as lost as me? Don’t worry too much because Einstein was as well, and Copernicus never even came close. Functionally, although still more of a metaphor, I like to think of voltage as the pressure or force pushing the electricity through a circuit. If high amps require large pipes (wires) then you can think of the volts as the pump pushing the electricity through the pipes. Realize this is not truly the case, but thinking of it like this you can make your solar system function. The higher the volts the higher the pressure which will lower the amps. It’s sort of like a high pressure washer hose. You can have a lot of power going through a tiny little hose nozzle if the pressure is high enough. If you have a 2” pipe with 200 PSI you can pump about 600 gallons per minute through that. With 1 PSI it takes a 6” pipe to flow about the same amount of water through. Higher amp with lower volts is similar to the large pipe gushing water out with low pressure. Thinking of it like this is helpful in my mind. If you go with a 12V or 24V system you will want to do short runs with thick wires to gush your electricity around. Once you hit your inverter (high pressure pump), you can shrink the wires (although you need very large wires from your battery to your inverter) and use the tiny AC wires with high pressure to power your high 120V appliances. Hopefully that makes enough sense. And even if it doesn’t make sense then go eat a sheep cheeseburger, read your manuals, and you can likely make your solar system function. Or if you are vegan go eat a salad, read your manuals, and you can likely make your solar system function.
Wattage (watts): This is your electrical power, the combination of volts and amps. Watts measure the rate at which electrical energy is used, generated, or transferred per second. One watt is equal to one joule per second and is calculated by multiplying voltage by current (amps). Basically if you are trying to figure out watts you multiply amps and volts. A 12 volt 10 amp charger, appliance, or whatever will be using 120 watts (12 x 10). A 12 volt 2 amp charger or whatever will be using 24 watts (12 x 2). A 120 volt 1 amp charger or whatever will be using 120 watts (120 x 1). A 120 volt 10 amp charger or whatever will be using 1,200 watts (120 x 10). Many appliances, chargers, tools, solar panel and whatever will have a sticker showing either watts, volts, and/or amps used. This is a very important concept that can help you figure out what size of solar system you actually can live with. Related to this is kWh which is kilowatt-hour. This is how your electrical bill will be represented. What this means is 1,000 watts run for one hour. If you have 500 watts running for one hour you will be using 0.5 kWh and if you have 2,000 watts running for one hour you will be using 2 kWh. If you are using 100 watts over 24 hours you will have used 2.4 kWh. Realize that some appliances do not run non-stop. A refrigerator for example runs 20% to 30% of the time, so you would multiply your wattage use by about 0.25 and then multiply it by 24 (hours of the day) to get an estimate of a day’s use. Hope that all makes enough sense. In very hot conditions the refrigerator can run a lot more of the time, which is another thing to consider. Read the books referenced to get more details.
Amp Hour: Batteries for solar are typically labeled in amp hours. Some will be in kWh (Kilowatt hour) and some are labeled with both. To get the kWh from the amp hours simply multiply the voltage rating and the amp hours together. A 12V 200Ah battery can use 1 amp at 12V for 200 hours, or 10 amps at 12V for 20 hours, or 200 amps at 12V for 1 hour. Although your battery discharge rate may not be able to handle 200 amps, but you get the idea. Going with kWh can be easier in some regards because the voltage does not matter. And in a solar system often you will be running things at different voltages. With the above example you would have 2.4kWh (12V x 200Ah) or 2400 watts to use over an hour. So if your laptop used 150 watts and you had it plugged in for two hours you would use 300 watt hours or 0.3kWh bringing your battery bank down to 2.1kWh. In reality you get some loss through all of this, which is especially true when you go through an inverter. We’ll go over the losses in a little more detail later on.
Series: With any circuit you can run things in parallel and series. The most important thing for us to realize is what happens with solar panels and batteries. If you link the panels or batteries together in series you will be increasing the voltage but the amps stay the same. So if you link 6 solar panels together that are 25V and 10A you will have 150V and 10A coming out of that. If you linked together 4 batteries that are 12V and 100Ah you would have a 48V 100Ah battery bank. That battery bank would be a 4.8 kWh bank. In series all of the panels’ or batteries’ voltage will add up but the amps will stay the same. This setup is done by connecting the positive wires to the negative wires of the next panel or battery together in series.
Parallel: So now let’s pretend we went in parallel instead of series with the same system as above. With those 6 solar panels that are 25v and 10A you would have 25v and 60A coming out if linked in parallel. With the 4 batteries at 12V and 100Ah you would have 12V and 400Ah. The battery bank would still be a 4.8kWh bank. That is because your total wattage is still volts x amps which is still the same. In parallel all of the panels’ or batteries’ amperage will add up but the voltage will stay the same. This setup is done by connecting the positive wires to the positive wire/terminal and the negative wires to the negative wire/terminal of the next panel or battery together in parallel.
Solar String: If you connect four solar panels together in series (increasing the voltage) you are creating a “solar string.” Many systems will have multiple solar strings. They can be anything from 2 panels connected in series or many more.
Solar Array: The solar array is all of your solar panels connected together. Often this is multiple solar strings connected together. If you have two 400W panels connected together in series and then you connect four strings together you would have a 3200W array. The series connections would be increasing the voltage and the strings connected together in parallel would be increasing the amps. For easy math lets pretend those 400W panels are 40V 10A. Each string would be 80V 10A and when you combine all four strings you would have a 80V 40A solar array sitting at 3200W (400 x 8 panels or 80V x 40A = 3200W).
Battery Bank: You can have a solar system with zero or many batteries. Solar systems with no batteries are typically used for things like water pumps into cisterns and pond aerators. For a home or shop operation you would want at least one battery so your system runs smoothly when a cloud passes by and to have some function when the sun goes down. Our solar system only has one 12V 200Ah battery. You want to size the bank to your panels. If your battery bank is too large of a capacity for your solar array your batteries will never fully charge which will shorten the lifespan; lead acid batteries especially should be fully charged very regularly. Our battery bank is 2.4 kWh (12 x 200 = 2400) which tops off very quickly with our 800 watts of power coming from the solar panels. If our batteries were down to 50% it would take about 1.5 hours of direct sun to top them off. People often calculate that they have four to six hours of full sun to base their numbers off of. So we could have as much as a 4.8 kWh battery bank and our panels could top that off every sunny day. With a 1600 watt solar array you could double that to 9.6 kWh. With a 3200 watt solar array you could double that again up to 19.2 kWh battery bank. We’ll go over battery types and some details on them later on. Something for now is that with a lead acid battery bank you may want to double the capacity of what you think you’ll want. This is because you really ought to stay above 50% capacity always with lead acid type batteries. So 50% capacity means your useful kWh is cut in half. With Lithium Iron Phosphate batteries you can deplete down further, it’s recommended to stay above 20% to extend their lifespan but you can go down to 10% or even 0% with some brands without damaging them.
A battery bank can be wired in series which would be wiring positive terminals to negative terminals and negative terminals to positive. That will add your voltage together but your amp hours will stay the same. If you had two 6V 100Ah batteries you could link two of them together in series to give you a 12V system with 100Ah (total 1.2kWh). If you had four 12V 100Ah batteries you could link them all together in series to give you a 48V system with 100Ah (total 4.8kWh).
A battery bank can also be wired in parallel which would be wiring the positive terminals to the positive terminals and the negative terminals to the negative. This will increase the amp hours. So if you had two 6V 100Ah batteries and you linked them in parallel you would still have only 6V but the amp hours would increase to 200 (1.2kWh). This is not a typical voltage for solar home solar systems and wouldn’t work for most charge controllers so you would want to do series instead. If you had four 12V 100Ah batteries you could link them all together in parallel to give you a 12V system with 400Ah (total 4.8kWh). Notice that the kWh stays the same no matter the configuration of series or parallel. So if you have eight 12V 100Ah batteries connected in any configuration you will always end up with a 9.6kWh battery bank.
The solar array idea is also used with batteries. Let’s pretend you have eight total batteries running at 12V 200Ah in this system. Let’s say your charge controller can handle 3200 watts only if you run it at 48V, which is fairly common. So you have four batteries connected in series and all of them are doubled up in parallel. This would give you a 48V 400Ah battery bank with 19.2 kWh of use. If you had a 24V system with the same batteries you would have 24V 800Ah with the same 19.2kWh of battery use. If you had a 12V system with the same batteries you would have 12V 1600Ah with the same 19.2kWh of battery use.
Discharge Rate: Your batteries will have a discharge rate, which is the amount of amps that can continuously leave the battery. Some also have a “surge discharge rate” which can go higher for a short period of time – this helps to start large motors and such. This will either be rated in amps or labeled as the letter C and would be called the C discharge rate. A 200Ah battery that can discharge at 1C would be able to be powering 200amps continuously and be drained to 0 in one hour if used at that rate. If it were a 0.5C discharge rating it could use 100 amps continuously and be drained to 0 capacity in two hours. A 2C discharge rating could use 400 amps and be drained to 0 capacity in 30 minutes – you get the idea I hope. Our battery has a 2,000 five-second amp surge capacity and then 60 amp continuous capacity for discharging, which is decent (and equal to 0.3 C discharge rate). What that means is we can run at 720 watts (60 amps X 12 volts) continually. With many batteries you can double your discharge rate by putting two together in parallel. Check up on your battery details from the manufacturers writings, or sometimes the information is printed right on the battery. When our current battery dies we might switch to a higher discharge rate battery or put two together. It would be nice to have the capacity to run at ~1500 watts for longer durations. With our AGM battery from what I understand is that you physically can run continuously above 60 amps but the higher you go above that the more long term damage you are doing. So if we ran 2,000 watts from our inverter for longer than 5 seconds (the surge period) we would slowly start degrading our battery. If we did this often we would greatly reduce the lifespan. With some batteries it can be much more risky, so check with your battery manufacturer to understand the risks.
Charge Rate: The charge rate is similar but is to charge the battery not discharge it. To follow the same example as above if your 200Ah battery has a 1C charge rate you could charge it with 200 amps continuously and it would charge to 100% from zero in 1 hour. If it had a 0.5C charge rating you could use 100 amps to charge it up to 100% from zero in 2 hours. If it had a 2C charge rating you could use 400 amps and charge it up to 100% from zero in 30 minutes and that would be a very abnormal battery. We can charge our battery with 60 amps continuously which makes it a 0.3C (60 / 200) charge rating. It is pretty normal to have a lower charge rating than discharge rating in a battery, don’t assume they are the same.
Solar System Components
The basic components of most solar systems are these:
And often for a shop or home system you might want or need these:
The solar panels are the generator of the system. Basically the sun photons hit the panels and create a chemical reaction which starts the flow of electrons into the circuit. Then the charge controller will send that power from the panels in the correct voltage to the battery bank to keep it healthy increasing the lifespan. From there you can run all sorts of 12V or 24V appliances and do-dads depending on how you configure it. Connected to the battery can also be an inverter which will convert the voltage from 12V, 24V, or 48V into 120V and/or 240V (in the USA) to run any of your regular appliances. All of this requires wires to connect everything together which is a very important part of this system. And it is very intelligent to add some fuses in your system to decrease the risk of fire. There are also other components which may be needed or desired depending on how you build your system. I ended up using a combiner box to maximize our system and add breakers between the panels and charge controller. With the combiner box we were able to use three panels instead of two panels had we linked them in series. With the charge controller you need to stay within the parameters that the manufacture recommends. They will give you a voltage and amperage range, and with our system the voltage was too high with three panels. However the amperage was still fine with three. So we ran three single panels into a combiner box which boosted the amps, but not the volts keeping us within the charge controller ranges. This setup gives us breakers to protect the charge controller and maximizes the potential of our system running at 12V which is awesome. This charge controller can also run at 24V or 48V making it so we could add a lot more panels and batteries if we wanted to go this route. One of the benefits of going with higher voltage is your wire gauge can shrink. The lower the volts the higher the amps and the larger the wire needed. So if you go with 12V like we did, you really want to keep your primary components very close together. If you increase the voltage you can shrink the wires and have longer running wires. These are things to consider while building your system and is elaborated on in the recommended books.
Which type of panels should you get? At this time (2026) the most commonly used new installation uses monocrystalline solar panels. They have become a pretty solid choice for now with a good price point and efficiency of space used to watts produced. In the not too distant future keep your eyes out for perovskite solar panels. As they become more mainstream and the prices drop these might be the next most common panel with higher efficiencies. There are two other types used today which you may want to consider. The flexible panels (thin-film) are pretty good if you are mounting them on an RV or if you want them to be more sturdy against hail damage. However they typically are not built as well, have shorter lifespans, and shorter warranties. Many people have them die out within 10 years or so. So unless you really need it for some specific application I would not recommend them. Monocrystalline can last 30-40 years, and even longer – but the energy produced will slowly decline. The other viable option is the polycrystalline panels, they are a bit less efficient so you will take up more space for the same wattage output. I would only consider them if you get a very good deal, they are typically 15% to 18% efficient compared to 20%-25% with monocrystalline. Heterojunction cells (HJT) are also becoming more common, they are a type of monocrystalline n-type that is often hitting close to 25% efficiency. There are also PERC and solar tiles, search around on the internet for more info if interested. There are more but most of them have much lower efficiencies so they take up a lot of space, which is not too useful to the common DIY off-grid setup. There are other options and reasons to consider but we won’t go into them here.
Keep in mind, it isn’t the best idea to buy solar panels first without knowing your other components. It’s smart to at least theory build your system before buying parts. The charge controller might not function with some panels because of incorrect voltage or amp ranges. And you don’t want to get a battery bank too large where your panels cannot keep them charged up if you are going off-grid. If your battery bank is large enough that you likely cannot keep the batteries topped off during a bout of overcast, you will want a generator to top them off. It is smart to have your system built on paper before buying anything.
With solar panels shipping can really add up. It can potentially save you a good bit finding a good local seller and pick them up yourself. Or driving out to a warehouse if any are somewhat nearby that sell panels. Buying by the pallet can also save money in shipping. Just some things to consider. Also some extended warranties may only apply when installed by certified installers, something to look at when shopping around. There are many mid-range solar panels that can be pretty cheap and are still solid quality that will give you a long lifespan. There are a lot of people and companies that upgrade their solar every 10-15 years and you can buy used panels for very cheap sometimes. This isn’t a terrible idea, you can get 30-40 years or even more from a solar panel. So if you find the right deal just go check them out, if they are physically in good shape take a voltmeter to it and see if it reads close to what’s labeled on the back. It is smart to get all the same age, brand, and type of panel. If you see a stack of them with the top one exposed to the sun, that one is likely worn down more than the others behind it.
Here are a few websites to check out if you want reviews of some solar panel brands:
https://www.smartenergyusa.com/solar-panels/
https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/what-are-the-best-solar-panels-to-buy-for-your-home
online purchasing options:
www.solar-electric.com www.altestore.com www.santansolar.com
https://a1solarstore.com/ www.signaturesolar.com
Which type of solar mount should you get? Typically people do a roof mounting system or a ground mounting system. There is also wall mounting, which is most useful in apartments and such. This is one part of the solar system that people may want to hire out if they are not very strong or skilled with building things. You also need to consider your roof orientation and pitch. Ideal is pointing south (in the northern hemisphere) and angled about the same as your latitude. If you are at 30-degree latitude and you have a nice 30-degree roof pointing south you are in great shape. If your roof is pointing east/west you will lose about 15% efficiency pointing to the west and 20% pointing to the east. If your roof is 45 degrees pointing to the south you will have more solar gain in the winter and less in the summer. Do not put panels on the north side (shade side); it is not worthwhile. Those are some things to think about with roof mounting. You can also get a roof mount with an angle adjustment to get a better angle. We went with a ground pole mount system which cost roughly $1200 all things considered. If you have a lot of space I’d recommend ground mounting. I don’t like drilling holes in my roof! We did do a roof mount for our solar pump pulling water from a nearby spring, but I don’t mind drilling holes in a little garden shed. The roof mounting can be a bit cheaper and faster since the structure is already there. One big perk to me about ground mounting is how much easier it is to clean the panels. In the winter I brush snow off of them and all I need is a shop push broom. My neighbors’ setup is fairly dangerous, walking along an icy platform brushing snow off isn’t my cup of tea. In higher wind areas make sure you get a mounting system with good wind resistance. Our top-of-pole mount kit was rated for about 120 mph wind, which should be plenty. Also we put our system in front of our shop (on the south/sunny side) which protects it from the prevailing winds from the north.
Some mounting options:
https://signaturesolar.com/all-products/mounting-options-hardware/
https://www.solar-electric.com/residential/panel-mounts-trackers.html
Which type of charge controller should you get? There are two primary types available and I’d recommend going with the MPPT type, which stands for Maximum Power Point Tracking. You get about 20% less efficiency going with the older PWM type, which sands for Pulse Width Modulation. The MPPT type is somewhat more expensive but they will pay for themselves in power gained. I’d only recommend the old PWM types for very small systems, not for whole house or shop systems. Perhaps for a small shed that you use to pump water and charge power tool batteries it would be fine enough. But if you are making a more robust system that will be used for many applications I would highly recommend paying a little more for the MPPT type. Your charge controller is the brains of the operation. It will be taking the power flowing from the panels and sending that to your batteries. If you go with a very cheap charge controller you may end up paying more in the long run if it isn’t treating your batteries well. The battery bank is often the most expensive part of the solar system, so you want them to be charged correctly. A good charge controller will do that for you and most of them are very simple to install. Just plug the wires in and pick the settings for your battery type. Another thing with MPPT types is they are usually a lot more flexible with what voltage and amps come from your solar panels, with the PWM type you often have to make sure the panels’ voltage is close to what your battery bank voltage is. It is smart to settle on what charge controller you want to get and download the manual to be certain that all the other components you buy will be compatible.
Some of the top recommended brands would be MidNite, Morningstar, and Victron. We got the Morningstar TriStar MPPT-60 and are happy with it. Most people are happy with all three of these brands. You can find much cheaper charge controllers, but you may end up getting a lemon and if it’s too cheap you might really shorten the lifespan of your batteries which isn’t worth it in my view.
https://www.morningstarcorp.com/
https://www.victronenergy.com/
Which battery should you get? In my view there are two primary options, two secondary options, and two potential future options to keep an eye on. If you do not want to read much on batteries just read the first two types, those are what I would recommend with the options available right now. I’m going into a bit more detail here because what battery type you pick determines many other aspects of your system. You need to make sure your charge controller can charge the type of battery you pick. Also I think battery technology is pretty neat so I’ve read a lot on it and want to share some useful details with whoever reads this.
There are many brands for batteries out there, and you often get what you pay for. We got a mid-range Renogy AGM battery. I don’t expect it to last as long as the brands listed below. In each battery type I’ll link some solid brand choices for you to consider.
Top choices, I would recommend going with one of these first two primary options: AGM (Absorbent Glass Mat) – This is a sealed lead acid battery and the type of battery we went with.
PRO’s
CON’s
Solid brand options for AGM type batteries:
https://rollsbattery.com/catalog/
https://lifelinebatteries.com/agm-batteries/
https://www.trojanbattery.com/applications/solar-batteries
https://www.crownbattery.com/renewable-energy-storage
LiFePO4 (Lithium Iron Phosphate) – This type is becoming very popular for many reasons.
PRO’s
CON’s
Some budget to high end brands to consider:
https://www.eco-worthy.com/collections/12V-24V-batteries
https://www.epochbatteries.com/
https://eg4electronics.com/categories/batteries/eg4-ll-12V-400ah-lithium-iron-phosphate-battery/
Secondary choices, still worthwhile in some circumstances.
FLA (Flood Lead Acid) – This was the original standard for solar systems. Many people still go with this. I don’t really recommend this type because of the dangers and regular maintenance. However if you treat them well they will treat you well, there is a reason they are still fairly popular in the off-grid world.
PRO’s
CON’s
Solid brand options for lead acid type batteries:
https://rollsbattery.com/catalog/
https://www.trojanbattery.com/applications/solar-batteries
https://www.crownbattery.com/renewable-energy-storage
Gel Deep Cycle Marine – another type of sealed lead acid battery
PRO’s
CON’s
Solid brand options for gel type batteries:
https://rollsbattery.com/catalog/
https://www.victronenergy.com/batteries
These last two are on-the-horizon choices. The first one is available now but they are newer tech and not quite ready in my view. They have high potential to become a great choice if the kinks are worked out. One I won’t go into but is similar to sodium ion is lithium titanate (LTO). They also have some potential with a very long lifespan, but have similar drawbacks as sodium ion and will likely stay expensive. The last option I’ll dig a little into is likely not to be readily available for some time (after 2030). You will see them in EV’s (electric vehicles) first, it might be a while before they are easy to get and affordable for the off-grid systems. Both of these are something to keep an eye on.
Sodium Ion – There is a lot of hype around this battery and in time might become a winner, but I don’t think it’s quite there yet.
PRO’s
CON’s
I don’t know of any brands worth recommending, I think they will come soon enough though. Keep your eyes out for CATL, EVE Energy, Sunwoda, Gotion, and Haichen Storage sodium ion batteries; they all seem heavily invested in this technology. Gotion just made some breakthroughs and are partners with Volkswagen which should have batteries available before 2030.
Solid State Lithium Ion or Solid State Sodium Ion – These are actively being worked on but not available yet. Expect to see the solid state lithium ion batteries in EV’s by the year 2030 unless something prevents it. The sodium ion type will likely take a bit longer.
PRO’s
CON’s
What type of inverter should you get? There are two main types of AC inverters for solar systems, pure sine wave and modified sine wave. If you only get one for the whole house get a large pure sine wave type. We have one smaller 300 watt pure sine wave type, a larger 2800 watt pure sine wave plus a 2000 watt modified sine wave. If I did it over again I would have never bought the modified sine wave inverter. We don’t use it. I’ve dug in deeper to the information on these and I would not recommend using one. You will likely shorten the lifespan of most things you plug into a modified sine wave by 20-30%. Sometimes things just die the first time you power up. Things run hotter as well. It’s really not worth risking, it isn’t worth the small savings you get using the cheaper inverter. The grid provides a clean pure sine wave, so that is what most people are used to and what AC equipment is built for.
When you go through an inverter you get some loss in efficiency so in my view it’s ideal to use the inverter as little as possible. If you can put most of your things on a 12V DC circuit you don’t have to always be running your inverter or inverters. With a high quality pure sine wave you can get 85-95% efficiency, some are even higher but that’s not as common. With the modified sine wave inverter you can get 75-90% efficiencies. Our 300 watt pure sine wave inverter is probably closer to 95% efficiency, it doesn’t even have a fan and doesn’t produce much heat. We use the 300 watt inverter to charge laptops and batteries. We use a heavy duty (lower frequency) pure sine wave 12V 2800 watt inverter for power tools, laundry machine, and anything else that needs more than 300 watts. If you are running new equipment and smaller motors you would likely be fine getting a “high frequency” pure sine wave inverter. Those are the most common and work for most applications, they are also lighter weight (20 lbs-) and cost less. Sometimes they make more noise though and can have a shorter lifespan. If you are running large motors it is recommended to go with a “low frequency” inverter. They cost more and are heavy (40 lbs+) but they often last longer, are often quieter, and work better for a wide range of tools and appliances. Some of the larger heavy high frequency inverters function a little more like the low frequency ones and might do a great job on older larger motors and such. Another thing to understand is that with many quality inverters you can wire them together in parallel or series. Doing such will increase your amperage in parallel or voltage in series. This option can be very helpful in a situation where you might need high power output, like a large wood shop.
From your battery to your inverter keep your wire lengths short (under 4ft is ideal) and make sure you use a large gauge wire to the inverter. A 2000 watt inverter can run continuously at 166 amps. With that it’s recommended to have 0 or 00 gauge wires for this on a 12V system. You would also want a 200-250 amp fuse on the positive wire as a protection from fire. The easiest is a marine “bolt on” fuse (MRBF terminal fuse).
Some inverter brands worth looking at:
https://www.victronenergy.com/inverters
https://www.morningstarcorp.com/product_category/solar-inverters/
https://www.magnum-dimensions.com/renewable-energy-products/inverter-chargers
Wires and fuses: With 12V systems you will be dealing with large gauge wires and short runs. The lower the amps and higher the volts the thinner the wires and longer runs you can do. Typically you can have thinner longer wires going from your panels to your charge controller, then they will increase in size from charge controller to battery bank. From the battery bank you want large wires to all the components that are higher amps and fuses are highly recommended. Follow the manufacturers recommendation for wire sizes and fuses, if they aren’t included in the instructions you can find the information online for generic sizes for whatever amps and lengths you are doing. You can also use a fuse block to distribute DC power to various appliances or components. Fuses are very important in a solar system. They can protect equipment and prevent fires. If you end up with some faulty equipment or a short (negative and positive wires crossing) that takes place your wires themselves will act as a fuse, and they can heat up to the point of burning up and catching fire. A fuse has a built in weak point that has a lower melt or blow out point than the wire. That makes it so the fuse will melt or break in some way so the circuit will close (be interrupted). This is an essential component to protect everything. For example touching a metal item to both the positive and negative terminals will short your battery out. Do not do this. You can cover the terminal ends with plastic or rubber to help prevent this. If your toaster, or washing machine, or whatever else shorts out and fails in a bad way and you have a fuse in the line the fuse will burn out and prevent any further damage. If you don’t the wires can heat up to the point of sparking, melting, and starting things on fire.
See the chart below for some basics on sizing wires on a 12V system. For 24V and 48V look online for more details. The sizes can drop as the voltage increases because the amperage decreases for the same amount of total power/wattage. For more elaborate or higher wattage systems it can be necessary to increase the voltage of the system.

Chart taken from https://powmr.com/blogs/accessories/battery-cable-size-chart go there for more details.
Some optional components might be needed or not depending on different situations. We’ll briefly cover these parts, what they do and why you might want or need them. For convenience I’ll copy the list from above on the optional solar system parts.
It’s pretty smart to add a shunt and battery monitor to your system. The shunt combined with the battery monitor can give you all sorts of details on your batteries status. It can show you the voltage, the percent of charge, the amps being used, and more. For a super basic setup you may not care to have such information, but for a home or shop that is used regularly it seems pretty essential in my view. But it is optional, you can run a solar system without it and we did for a month or so before installing it.
A Combiner Box is very common and used in most home solar systems. I briefly mentioned above that we ended up using one even though we had a simple 3 panel system. What it does is create a parallel circuit with your solar panels, which will add (or combine) all of the amperage together. When this is done you will need higher gauge wires going out of the combiner box than what is going in. Often what people do is have multiple panels wired together in series increasing the voltage. Then all of those wires will go into the combiner box. With this component you can easily wire together many panels. For an example say you had twelve 300 watt panels in your array, for easy math let’s say they are 30V 10A. Say you wired them together in sets of three in each row in series, giving you 90V 10A. Then you took those four strings and wired them into your combiner box. Out of the combiner box you would have 90V 40A giving you a total of 3600W to wire into your charge controller.
A DC to DC converter is something I do not have but might get someday. They are very useful and sometimes are built into higher quality AC inverters. What it basically does is take your DC voltage and convert it to whatever voltage you want. So if you have a 48V system and you desire to run 12V or 24V components you can do such a thing. Or if you have a 12V system and you want to run a 90V motor you could do that. Some can do a wide range of voltage settings and some are built to only do a single step (such as 12V to 24V only). I’ve thought of many reasons to have one of these but I don’t really need it yet so I’ve put it off. Just want you to know it’s out there and might be useful for you.
You may need an AC Electrical Distribution Box (Breaker Box) for your inverter. Some inverters have outlets built into them, some you can wire directly to outlets and such, and others need a breaker panel of sorts – especially larger inverters. You can buy pre-wired distribution boxes at various online stores. If you are more skilled it doesn’t seem too bad to wire one yourself, but we went with a prebuilt one to make it easier and we aren’t putting in much wiring. If you need a lot of wiring, such as if you want outlets in every room of your house and many appliances you will likely want to build one from scratch or have an electrician do this step for you. If you only need 2-4 or so outlets a prebuilt box would be an easier path and potentially cheaper. This particular device I’ve had a hard time finding outside Ebay and Amazon.
Power Distribution Breaker Box 120V
To make all your wiring more neat and clean you can add a Bus Bar. This can be used on the positive side and the negative side of your battery wiring. Some are built with both positive and negative to the same bar. This is especially nice to have the more wiring you have. With elaborate wiring setups it becomes nearly impossible to put it all on your battery terminals. With this you will have your battery wire going to the busbar, and then you wire into the busbar instead of to the battery terminal. Even with smaller systems it is nice to have things more tidy with these contraptions. We have one for our grounding as well, it was getting very messy – these can also save in overall wire lengths.
Bus Bars – red – black – white
Fuse Block. There are many fuse blocks or fuse distribution boxes built for boats and RV’s that are nice for 12V and 24V systems. We have one for expansion with 6 fuses that can go up to 100 amps combined. This is nice for wiring lights, phone chargers, laptop chargers for cars, and much more.
Distribution blocks (I’d recommend one with fuses)
Another very useful tool is the Power Pole, SB50/SB90, XT60/XT90 connectors, Daier rocker switches, and more. These are a few systems built for boats, RV’s, robotics, RC’s, and car audio that are very useful for the home and shop. In my view people are limiting themselves somewhat by just thinking of a home solar system as a typical 120V/240V (USA) inverter driven system. There are so many things that can hook into a 12V or 24V system thanks to all those boat and RV folks out there. We have a power pole since it was gifted to us by a couple who used it in their RV years back. All you need to do is add the power pole adapters to the end of your wires, it’s fairly easy. It’s helpful to watch a video or look up tutorials on how to add the clip to your wires, but once you get it down it’s pretty simple. Once you have them attached you can plug them in and out onto your power pole box. With this simple device you can have many things that you can swap around or keep some of them permanently plugged in if you desire. Something nice about these is they have a built in fuse for each line as a nice protection. The SB50 (50amp), SB90 (90amp), XT60 (60amp) and XT90 (90amp) plugs are useful for quickly connecting and disconnecting different medium amp devices. The SB50/90 are easier to connect and disconnect so if you plan on swapping things around with those consider that. If you are dealing with moisture at all the XT60/90 connectors seem a bit tighter and might help with that. Daier builds various “rocker switch panels” that you can connect various DC powered items with little on/off switches on a single panel. As you look around you will find all sorts of innovative and useful tools for the DC side of your solar system.
How to install Powerpole connectors
Victron Lynx DC Distribution Systems
Example solar systems
Lastly I want to go over an example of a solar system you could do. Like mentioned above I’d recommend changing your lifestyle and decreasing your overall need for electricity so you can go with the more simple 12V or 24V system. The cost can get pretty high with a larger battery bank and 48V system. The more robust you go the less worthwhile it is to go off-grid. If you want to stay grid tied it isn’t a terrible idea to just make a basic 12V system with one or two batteries in your garage or shop as an emergency backup system. But it is much cooler to drop the power bill and get off-grid. We have zero monthly bills in our life right now and it is wonderful, join the party!
Note that with many of the components listed here you can find a good or even great deal on these gently used. I’d recommend going with solid name brand components and avoid the cheapest components out there if you want it to last. I will list what we have in our system here with a few alternate options as well. You can also look back at previous segments to think about more options.
Here is our 12V 800 watt system:
Solar Panels: Panels vary a bit in quality and price; we bought three 340 watt Suniva OPT340-72-4-100 panels for about $740 total locally. They aren’t great but good enough for the price. Expect to pay $600-$1,500 for similar or somewhat better panels.
Single Pole Mount: Mount kit, schedule 40 steel 4” and 3” poles, and cement all totaled ~$1,200
This is the mount brand we did https://tamaracksolar.com/products/pole-mounting-system/top-of-pole-portrait/
Here is the mount kit we went with https://www.ecodirect.com/Tamarack-Solar-UNI-PGRM-3P1-47-Top-of-Pole-Mount-p/tamarack-uni-pgrm-3p1-47.htm
There are many variations https://www.ecodirect.com/Tamarack-Solar-Top-of-Pole-Mounts-s/1008.htm
Combiner Box: we bought a mid-grade PowGrow 4 string combiner box ~$150
Charge Controller: Morningstar Tristar MPPT TS-60M ~$800
Battery: Renogy 200Ah AGM battery ~$400
https://www.renogy.com/pages/deep-cycle-agm-battery-12-volt-200ah-rng-batt-agm12-200-html
Battery monitor and shunt: Our charge controller came with this as a combo. You can buy one separate from various brands for ~$60-$200.
Powerpole: Ours came free from our neighbor, but they are roughly $80. You will want a distribution box or hub, connectors, and crimping tool. This is optional but useful.
Wires: Many of ours were salvaged from neighbors, if you buy them all new expect to pay roughly $600. The price can vary quite a bit depending on many factors. Napa Auto is a good place to buy large gauge wires with battery terminal ends attached and heat shrink wrapped made to whatever length you need. Keep your high amp wires as short as possible.
https://www.bougerv.com/products/mc4-crimping-tool-kit
MRBF battery terminal fuse block (bolt on): ~$70
Inverter #1: Morningstar 300 watt ~$300
https://www.morningstarcorp.com/products/suresine-classic/
Inverter #2: Outback Power VFXR2812A ~$600
https://outbackpower.com/product/fxr-vfxr-series/
Electrical Box: ~$120
Total system cost ~$5,000 – $6,500 (higher price is with two batteries and higher price on everything.)
If you look around for deals, wait for sales, buy some things gently used, buy discontinued items, scrounge around for some parts, and use only one battery like we do you can do this for closer to $4,000. There are countless extras you will likely be adding to your particular system. The cost can easily go up depending on what you do and what you add.
What you could expect to run with this: Laptops, recharging power tools, washing machine, propane dryer, efficient refrigerator or chest freezer, smaller efficient A/C unit, and many other things. If you were trying to run all of these things at once you will run into problems. You would need to prioritize and conserve with this system but it really can do a lot.
Concluding remarks on this system we use: We enjoy this solar system build and are very happy with it. Of course you can always use more power, but I think it very worthwhile to adapt to a modest system. If you had a very low power bill of only $65 a month it would only take about 8 years to pay this system off entirely with the price point of $6,500. The average household power bill in the USA is closer to $142. So if you could adjust your lifestyle and switch to something like this it would take less than 4 years to pay off. And that would shorten further if you’re system was closer to $5,000 or $4,000. If your power bill is the average $142 per month, you could spend about $17,000 on a solar system and if you went off-grid it would pay for itself in ten years – not too shabby. Another thing to consider with going small and modest with your system – we also save a lot more overall because we aren’t buying lots of things that use electricity. We don’t have a dishwasher, dryer, multiple refrigerators and freezers, air-conditioner, heat pump, television, and countless other electrical devises. So we save money on multiple fronts because of this lifestyle.
I hope you gained something from this writeup if you were able to get through it all. If this helps even one person go off-grid it was worth the time it took to put this together in my view.
And of course there are many more options out there. You certainly don’t have to go with the same brands and equipment I list here, just giving you a starting place with some decent equipment for you to consider on your journey to disconnect from the grid if that is your desire. Some of the newer systems are 72V or even much higher, but I’m not as interested in this personally so I won’t give you many of the details. I don’t care to try and teach what I don’t know or care to know. In my view I don’t see myself going beyond a 24V system for anything I’d care to do. For a group project with a community use workshop of sorts that needs higher power I’d prefer to stick with 48V or lower. If there were any tools or equipment that needed more than what this could provide and it was only run from time to time perhaps a generator could be used. If the costs get too high and the grid is nearby it might just be smarter to use that. But I believe most situations it can be cheaper to go solar for your electric needs. Switch to wood, propane, or diesel for the bulk of your heating and heavy burst mechanical needs.
The End
Download the PDF version of this write up by clicking on this sentence.
Additional resources:
Here are a few books I found helpful. They are in order of my favorite to least favorite, but I found them all helpful with useful information.
Mobile Solar Power Made Easy! – by William Prowse IV
Off Grid Solar Power Simplified – by Nick Seghers
Solar & 12 Volt Power for beginners – by George Eccleston
Here are a couple pretty interesting and fun books on related subjects but not about solar systems.
DIY Lithium Batteries: How To Build Your Own Battery Packs – by Micah Toll
The Ultimate Do-It-Yourself Ebike Guide – by Micah Toll
And here are multiple sources of solar panel and/or battery diagrams, just in case any link dies or different explanations resonate more than another:
https://www.altestore.com/pages/schematics-wiring-solar-panels-and-batteries-in-series-and-parallel
https://www.solarray.com/TechGuides/WireDiagrams_T.php
https://www.renogy.com/blogs/learn-center/learn-series-and-parallel
https://www.solartap.com/blogs/diy-solar/solar-panel-wiring-diagram
https://windandsolar.com/blogs/wiring-diagrams/parallel-wiring-for-battery-banks
https://windandsolar.com/blogs/wiring-diagrams/battery-wiring-diagrams
If you have questions or need help this forum is active and great. The community is mostly kind and there are many very knowledgeable people willing to help. If you are building your own system and want some tips or assistance this is a great resource.
Solar system components can be bought at many shops, of course Ebay and Amazon have many parts. However a lot of the kits and solar equipment in general from those sites are not that great. Another thing to consider is that Amazon doesn’t really need our business, they account for about 40% of all online retail sales. If we want to keep options available It might be smart to use some of the other suppliers out there. Here are some solar suppliers that seem worthwhile.
https://www.solarpanelstore.com/
from
Roscoe's Story
In Summary: * A pretty productive Sunday winds down. A fair amount of mowing, trimming, and hauling branches in the back yard, a side yard and the front yard. And two loads of laundry washed and dried. That laundry still needs to be folded and put away; I'll take care of that after I've showered my old self. Then all that remains is the night prayers before a good night's sleep.
Prayers, etc.: * I have a daily prayer regimen I try to follow throughout the day from early morning, as soon as I roll out of bed, until head hits pillow at night.
Health Metrics: * bw= 228.07 lbs. * bp= 132/79 (78)
Exercise: * morning stretches, balance exercises, kegel pelvic floor exercises, half squats, calf raises, wall push-ups, BP breathing exercises, pilates
Diet: * 06:10 – 1 ham & cheese sandwich * 09:00 – cookies and cold milk * 11:45 – 3 boiled eggs * 13:20 – 1 pb&j sandwich
Activities, Chores, etc.: * 04:40 – bank accounts activity monitored. * 04:50 – read, write, pray, follow news reports from various sources, surf the socials, nap * 12:00 – started following a full day of baseball on MLB Star Spangled Sunday. * 13:45 – start my weekly laundry * 17:50 – yard tools put away, two loads of launfry wahed and dried
Chess: * 18:10 – moved in all pending CC games
from
💚
Our Father Who art in Heaven Hallowed be Thy name Thy Kingdom come Thy will be done on Earth as it is in Heaven Give us this day our daily Bread And forgive us our trespasses As we forgive those who trespass against us And lead us not into temptation But deliver us from evil
from
💚
For beasts to and from Lines of paint for people Followed in peace To the Irving family Day by day And in face Liberal abandon And as we are,- The admonished France will forgive you For whatever it was But in focus And because we fly These are the Baptists of the Earth And never more For the Englishman Two nights of liberty be And to the list of probability Gives me jitters This Stalin clause And nights of carrefour To the sysyphean code That lights will abide And men do appear As we came and prayed And so the night went And so as we Men of high stand And history commend The eruptions of labour To vape on this land A custom sea But there was a buffer And in this bitter place We ceased unto view For ecriture and ivory And tailing refute That we had rights And offer the same to many And shores of the everman To provide sympathy and protect And happy on medication As we seize the medical dough And worry Of these devices And how they got lot But with modest emplore The Navy will make a few And fight right in For the impossible in me This is the realm Of sympathy hereafter Bright enough to pause Without poking the poor As Ron could unite And beginning to understand- forthwith Deems for Hashmatullah A prayer for my best friend And finishing first In this double-cathedral And plying favours For the infotube In rise to the altar Speak Chalice And change and courage And they day as our night The purgatory of souls When and life In the aftermath And Nirvana- which exists as it has But fighting to against The argyle in simple view A religious Catholic Studied and studying For the peace in respect Of our Maliseet code Riding nation to nation And back to our forest In time together, our home And Sundays they come To steal us our war Forever in Peter And peace And Christ between embers The empathy in fire And then to able for By respective abandon If only our debt And seeing you here Giving peace And dust of the aftermath And if reconciliation they come By the airfield of Rome And hugging her The Church in they And undone as your labour But Olivet And the Earth became The bitter sin Of the first word After man And caress And knowing remark Substitute For Heavengod He would say: I am And disgracing the known Married kids And processions For the deeply possessed But iron war And its people No peace- but the Sun And never shall walk To the symptoms- of AI And the aftermark With high regret As a substitution And conflagrations became To the loading booth And the nightsrest When labouring few In The Eucharist For life and our hand To the Cross and peruse That our glory in soul That Jesus is Lord Whether atoms emplore All the fires- that may be And become A sympathy in breath.
from An Open Letter
This is a little bit of a different post than usual I guess, mostly because I know that I kind of want to vent but I also think maybe I shouldn’t. Not because there’s anything wrong with venting, but maybe it’s a more value for me to try to just acknowledge and look at this thought for what it is. This topic was spurred on from several different things, but the most concrete example I have is thinking about a random relationship reel I saw about a girl having something go wrong in the kitchen and getting incredibly overwhelmed, and her partner stepped up and helped regulate her and take care of it. There was a relationship counselor talking about it, and a lot of the comments were praising his emotional intelligence and how supportive he was, and they pointed out how he started to try to solve the problem first by asking about what happened and then caught himself and started to emotionally listen first and support in that way. I think I’m good at this in the sense that I typically will emotionally reassure first, and it’s not a conscious thing. It’s an automatic incentive for me, and I am happy with that. But at the same time I felt a little bit of disgust towards her. And it’s not really towards her, but more towards the shutting down at something like that, and the partner being praised for emotionally regulating her in that instance. And no one was talking about how she should be able to regulate herself and handle situations like that without shutting down. And I understand that my frustration is not towards her, but rather towards the expectation that I have towards myself that I am supposed to be self-sufficient in those ways. It’s not OK for me to shut down in situations like that, because that relies on someone else to be able to take care of me in that situation, and let alone a relationship, it’s not like a person like that will always be there. And I wonder how you are supposed to survive like that, because what I have learned is you need to be able to take care of yourself. But at the same time I think about how no one was saying that stuff towards her. I think a separate topic to think about how it would’ve gone if it was a man in that situation, but I digress. I think a meaningful thing to recognize is I think the ability to trust and depend on someone else that is a pretty meaningful indicator of safety potentially. And I don’t know if I’m capable of that right now. It’s a terrifying thing too have some kind of a need or something like that where you rely on someone else, not in a like sigma male way, but rather I feel like that’s just a recipe for depending on a relationship which makes it a necessity rather than a choice. And I think that is a festering ground for unhealthy traits. But I can’t help but think about how maybe I should be able to let my guard down past what is natural sometimes. I think I’ve just put a lot of emphasis into being emotionally self-sufficient, with inclusion of my therapy of course. And then it kind of feels unfair, that I emotionally regulate someone else but it’s not something that they can necessarily provide to me. And it just feels unfair. And I hope things are equitable, but I struggle to think about things that I individually struggle with that I can realistically expect someone else to account for. And it sucks because I end up getting put in this situation where it feels like even if it is a net positive to my life, I might just be getting a bit of the short stick. And I think it’s hard to view it in this way, because it feels very much like suffering from success. And the issue with that is it’s not that I think I am so incredibly above “good”, but I’d rather think that a lot of people are not necessarily in a good spot in life. And so it benefits me to continue to improve myself in these ways, and I know that right now this is very much seeming like I’m saying I’m perfect or close to that, but I absolutely know that’s not at all true. If that was true, I wouldn’t be complaining so much. I also wouldn’t be benefiting as much as I do from therapy, which is an indication of the room that I have to grow. But I guess it’s just kind of scary, and I think dating apps are only going to exacerbate that which scares me, because I want to be happy. Shocker.
from
Notes I Won’t Reread
The day started exactly how you’d expect. badly. so todays topic is work, because thats all my life consists of nowadays. it was painfully boring. boring enough you would start counting random objects just to convince yourself time is actually moving. eventually i managed to get myself into a bit of trouble, and somehow it ended with my nose bleeding. nothing exciting or worth telling, just one more inconvenience to add to the collection. so yes, objectively speaking, today was awful, oddly enough. non of that is what im thinking about now, not work, not the blood or the headache. she texted me. well technically, she deleted a message of 3. for a few seconds, though, i saw it” “i miss you too.” then it disappeared before i could even process it, and maybe she didnt mean to send it or she changed her mind, or maybe it was a mistake, regretting it the second she pressed send, and well i dont know, i dont think i even care. for those few seconds, i was happier than ive been in a long time. its almost humiliating how four words from one person can completely erase an entire miserable day. i smiled like an idiot over a message that doesnt even exist anymore, it felt like being drugged. like someone switched my brain off and replaced it with pure relief. i dont think i’ve ever stopped to appreciate how terrifying that is. i didnt have the courage to say much afterwards. i replied dryly, as if i was not sitting there with a hundred different things running through my head. if im being honest, i always knew they were your favorite. the ponies. i wasnt trying to impress you when i sent them, i’ve been planning that for a while. they were supposed to be your fourth of july flowers. i have an entire note about every flower you love, and another one about every flower you dont. hydrangeas or peonies instead of tulips. it wasnt even difficult to remember. i forget what i ate yesterday. i forget conversations. ill probably forget half of what happened this week. but every single time i see peonies, lily of the valley, you’ll be the first thing that comes to mind. i dont think thats ever going away, ill walk past them twenty years from now and still think of you before i think of the flower itself.
I didn’t have the guts to tell her any of that, not because I don’t have the courage, but because i dont know if id be speaking to someone who still wants to hear it, so ill leave it here instead, where it cant make things awkward and nobody can interrupt me. words have to end up somewhere otherwise they stay inside your chest long enough to convince you they’re part of your lungs.
Sincerely, Ahmed
from Sprachabenteuer
Achtung – Infos zur Website: 3. Juli
Heute habe ich mit Imke kurz darüber gesprochen, dass nächste Woche für unser Team die letzte Arbeitswoche vor den Ferien sein wird. Das bedeutet natürlich, dass noch viele Dinge fertiggestellt werden müssen. Da ich in letzter Zeit so viel Zeit mit Schreiben, Reportagen und anderen gemeinsamen Aufgaben verbracht habe – und ehrlich gesagt auch, weil mir das einfach interessanter erschien –, habe ich die Webseiten unserer Partnertheater bisher viel zu wenig angeschaut. Wieder einmal eine Aufgabe, die ich vor mir hergeschoben habe! Jetzt müssen meine Kollegin und ich uns beeilen und bis nächste Woche alles vorbereiten. Dann haben wir nämlich einen Termin mit den Leuten, die die Website unseres Projekts gestalten.
Eigentlich macht es mich ein bisschen traurig, dass ich nach einer Woche alleine arbeiten muss, während meine Kolleginnen im Urlaub sind. Ich kann mir diese Zeit ohne sie noch gar nicht vorstellen! Worauf ich außerdem noch achten muss, ist unser Hotel. Das Internet ist dort wirklich sehr langsam. Darüber müssen wir unbedingt noch sprechen, denn wir müssen unsere Videos bearbeiten und dafür brauchen wir eine stabile Internetverbindung, um größere Dateien hoch- und herunterzuladen. Da ich das Testen von Webseiten ehrlich gesagt ziemlich langweilig finde, werde ich darüber heute nicht viele Details schreiben.
Stattdessen möchte ich noch eine wichtige kulinarische – und natürlich deutsche – Entdeckung vorstellen: Käsespätzle! Dieses Gericht habe ich in einem Restaurant neben dem Bahnhof Karlshorst entdeckt. Unser Freund erzählte uns, dass dort Menschen arbeiten, die aus unterschiedlichen Gründen Schwierigkeiten im Leben hatten oder haben.
Das Essen dort ist allerdings wirklich sehr lecker und gleichzeitig ziemlich günstig. Außerdem sind alle unglaublich freundlich und die Portionen sind mehr als großzügig. Mit Mindaugas wurde es natürlich wieder etwas kompliziert, denn er wollte unbedingt ein Schnitzel bestellen. Eigentlich waren wir schon einmal mit meinen Freunden dort. Damals haben allerdings sie alles für uns bestellt – und es gab überhaupt keine Schwierigkeiten. Diesmal musste ich das Schnitzel selbst bestellen. Der Kellner zählte mir bestimmt sieben oder acht Varianten auf – irgendetwas wie „Münchner“, „Hawaii“, „Berliner“, „scharf“, „klassisch“ und noch viele andere. Da ich keine Ahnung hatte, welche Variante Mindaugas beim letzten Mal gegessen hatte, entschied ich mich nach kurzem Überlegen einfach für die Münchner Variante. Für mich selbst bestellte ich natürlich Käsespätzle. Wie ich inzwischen herausgefunden habe, bekommt man dieses Gericht sogar in manchen Einkaufszentren. Offenbar gehört es wirklich zu den deutschen Lieblingsgerichten – und mir schmeckt es ebenfalls ausgezeichnet! Bevor ich nach Hause fahre, werde ich auf jeden Fall noch einmal Käsespätzle kaufen und mitnehmen.
Ich hoffe außerdem, dass ich sie irgendwann auch selbst kochen werde. Dafür brauche ich allerdings zuerst ein wirklich gutes Rezept. Ich glaube, dafür frage ich lieber meine deutschen Kolleginnen und Kollegen – schließlich soll das Rezept auch wirklich authentisch sein!
from Faucet Repair
5 July 2026
Airframe (working title): an opening coinciding with a slamming, a gust of fresh air and momentum, light clipping edges, more delimitation but with less information. In the body of work that is coming together—there are probably five or six paintings contending right now—this one is the most pared back (and maybe the most sure of itself as a result). But it's hard to know if I trust it or not yet. Which is usually a sign that it's doing something. Anyway, this one comes on the heels of seeing Picabia at Hauser & Wirth today, which was actually a bit underwhelming (curation kind of one-note) but nevertheless left me with swirling impressions of bold line and calculated overlay. Have also been on a Richard Hamilton kick, and his Five Tyres Remoulded (1971) portfolio seems to be stuck in my mind; a manual on spatial exploration and contradiction and somehow transcending intention while declaring it. And so I came to a painting of a funneling of action, a hollowing of a vessel, a tidal force bottlenecked into a tiny collision under an intimate architecture. Looking ahead, I now see a small square of a day that looms large, its origami structure gradually unfolding.
from Sprachabenteuer
In der Stadt: 2. Juli
Mit dem etwas kühleren Wetter kommen unsere Hunde wieder zurück ins Bett zum Schlafen. Das ist eigentlich gar nicht so angenehm. Natürlich haben wir vor dem Schlafengehen unsere kleine Tradition: ein paar liebevolle Streicheleinheiten und etwas gemeinsame Zeit. Trotzdem war ich eigentlich immer froh, wenn sie später auf den Boden gegangen sind, denn unser Bett ist nicht besonders groß. Und zusammen nehmen sie wirklich sehr viel Platz ein! Da die Nächte jetzt wieder etwas kühler sind, verbrachten meine beiden wunderschönen Assistenten die ganze Nacht direkt neben mir, ganz eng an mich gekuschelt. Deshalb fiel mir das Aufstehen heute Morgen besonders schwer.
Eigentlich stehe ich in Vilnius normalerweise sehr früh auf. Nicht nur wegen des Yogas (das ich hier in Berlin leider viel seltener mache), sondern einfach, weil dieser Rhythmus mir gut tut. Aber hier in Deutschland wache ich viel später auf. Heute war es besonders schwierig – nach einer Nacht mit zwei Hunden, die fast das ganze Bett besetzt hatten. Trotzdem beschlossen meine Kollegin und ich, heute im Homeoffice zu arbeiten, da meine Chefin heute nicht im Büro sein konnte. Ich musste sowieso noch viele Texte schreiben und Informationen im Internet recherchieren, deshalb schien das auch von unterwegs gut möglich zu sein.
Nach dem ersten Arbeitsteil im Hotel fuhren wir mittags wieder ins Einkaufszentrum in Schöneweide. Dort ging ich ins Nagelstudio, um meine Nägel ein bisschen zu verschönern. Ich wurde von einer Chinesin behandelt. Sie war wirklich sehr nett, aber ihr Deutsch war für mich ebenfalls ziemlich schwer zu verstehen. Als wir über die Farbe meiner Nägel sprachen, versuchte ich zu erklären, dass mir die Entscheidung schwerfällt. Ich wollte etwas Sommerliches haben. Dieses Wort kannte sie allerdings nicht. Am Ende einigten wir uns irgendwie auf „schön“, „hell“ und „Sommer“. Herausgekommen ist schließlich ein sehr helles Pink-Rot. Mindaugas meinte, dass die Farbe schön, aber ziemlich knallig sei. Na gut – für den Sommer passt das schon, dachte ich! An meinen Fingernägeln arbeitete sie allerdings zweimal. Nach mehreren Schichten Farbe entfernte sie plötzlich wieder alles und begann von vorne. Ich fragte: „Machen Sie alles noch einmal neu?“ Sie antwortete: „Ja.“ Meine nächste Frage: „Warum? Was ist passiert?“ ...blieb allerdings unbeantwortet.
Da ich dort mehr Zeit verbracht hatte als geplant, musste ich später noch länger im Auto an meinen Tagebucheinträgen und meinen Folien arbeiten. Für den Abend hatten wir allerdings wieder eine Einladung auf die kleine Terrasse unseres Freundes. Er machte sich vorher große Sorgen, ob Mindaugas überhaupt durch die schmale Tür kommen würde. Aber es wurde zwar knapp – trotzdem hat alles funktioniert.
Unser Freund – also der Mann meiner Freundin – ist Deutscher und kocht unglaublich gern. Außerdem ist er wirklich talentiert und alles schmeckt hervorragend. Diesmal hatte er Kartoffeln mit Quark vorbereitet. Das gehört für mich inzwischen zu meinen deutschen Lieblingsgerichten! Außerdem schauten wir gemeinsam Basketball, denn Litauen spielte im Rahmen der Qualifikation gegen Großbritannien. Zurzeit läuft die Qualifikation für die Basketball-Weltmeisterschaft. Am Sonntag wird Litauen dann gegen Italien spielen. Für uns ist Basketball natürlich viel wichtiger als die gerade stattfindende Fußball-Weltmeisterschaft. Trotzdem sehen wir einige Gemeinsamkeiten zwischen der litauischen Basketballnationalmannschaft und der deutschen Fußballnationalmannschaft. Beide Mannschaften haben großes Potenzial, beide Länder sind in ihrer jeweiligen Sportart sehr erfolgreich und bekannt. Aber in letzter Zeit enttäuschen leider beide ihre Fans etwas. Deutschland ist bei der Weltmeisterschaft schon sehr früh ausgeschieden, und Litauen hat ein enttäuschendes Freundschaftsspiel gespielt. Deshalb hatten wir ein bisschen Angst, dass sich dieses Szenario wiederholen könnte.
Gegen Großbritannien hat zum Glück alles gut geklappt. Jetzt freuen wir uns auf das Spiel am Sonntag!
Ich merke, dass sich unser Alltag hier inzwischen – in der dritten Woche – langsam eingespielt hat. Deshalb muss ich darüber auch gar nicht mehr so viel schreiben. Besonders dann, wenn außer der Arbeit, der täglichen Suche nach gutem Essen und dem Einkaufen eigentlich nichts Besonderes passiert. Übrigens wollte ich gestern mein Monatsticket kaufen. Das war allerdings nicht mehr möglich, weil der Monat bereits begonnen hatte! Jetzt muss ich dafür extra zur BVG gehen und das Ticket direkt dort kaufen. Ach ja... wieder einmal habe ich etwas zu lange aufgeschoben.
from Sprachabenteuer
Ein neuer Monat: 1. Juli
Schon die Hälfte des Monats ist vorbei! Ich kann kaum glauben, wie schnell die Zeit vergeht.
Meine ersten Anmerkungen: 1. Ich arbeite in einem sehr netten Team und bekomme immer freundliche Unterstützung. Das ist wirklich ein großes Glück!
Ich habe noch nie so viel auf Deutsch geschrieben. Eigentlich entdecke ich langsam sogar ein bisschen Spaß daran, obwohl es nicht immer einfach ist, die Gedanken gleichzeitig festzuhalten. Ich gehöre insgesamt zu den Menschen, die gerne schreiben. Bisher habe ich diese Freude aber nur beim Schreiben auf Litauisch und später auch auf Englisch erlebt. Deutsch zu schreiben war für mich immer so schwierig, so gezwungen und irgendwie mühsam. Bis zu diesem Jahr hatte ich eigentlich nie eine richtige Beziehung zur deutschen Sprache. Sie war für mich immer wie ein unvollendetes Bild, ein ungelesenes Buch oder ein Lied, das zwar angefangen, aber nie zu Ende gespielt wurde. Solche Projekte habe ich in meinem Leben öfter – ich beginne sie mit Begeisterung, aber irgendwann bleiben sie einfach liegen. Ich habe keine Ahnung, ob man mit einer Sprache überhaupt jemals das Gefühl haben kann, dass sie „fertig“ ist. Trotzdem würde ich mich sehr freuen, wenn ich mich irgendwann ohne Hindernisse und ohne ständige Korrekturen frei auf Deutsch ausdrücken könnte. Ich vermute, dass mir gerade dieses Schreiben ein großes Stück dieser gewünschten Freiheit schenkt.
Ich überlege immer öfter, dass ich eine zu kurze Zeit für mein Praktikum gewählt habe. Aber leider kann ich daran nichts mehr ändern.
Nach der ganz normalen Arbeit mit der Sprache und den alltäglichen Aufgaben im Büro fuhren wir mit Mindaugas in ein Einkaufszentrum in der Nähe. Es liegt im Bezirk unseres Büros. Ich war so hungrig, dass ich unmöglich bis zu unserem Tierpark warten konnte. Dieses Einkaufszentrum wollten wir sowieso irgendwann einmal besuchen. Natürlich gibt es dort zahlreiche Geschäfte, Restaurants und andere Dienstleistungen (zum Beispiel ein Nagelstudio, das ich unbedingt irgendwann besuchen muss). Die ersten Unterschiede zu litauischen Einkaufszentren: Parkplätze und Toiletten! Bei uns bezahlt man normalerweise nichts fürs Parken, wenn man zwei oder vier Stunden im Einkaufszentrum bleibt. Das finde ich eigentlich ganz logisch, schließlich kommen die Kunden ohnehin zum Einkaufen und geben dort Geld aus. Hier in Deutschland muss man dagegen sogar am Einkaufszentrum für den Parkplatz bezahlen. Hier kostete es vielleicht nur einen Euro pro Stunde, aber trotzdem – das war neu für mich. Auch die Toiletten waren kostenpflichtig. Wenn ihr in Litauen ein Einkaufszentrum besucht, müsst ihr normalerweise nichts bezahlen, um die Toilette zu benutzen. Wir bekamen allerdings eine Ausnahme, weil wir offensichtlich die barrierefreie Toilette benutzt haben. Und ehrlich gesagt verstehe ich diese Ermäßigung nicht ganz.
Einerseits bekommen Menschen mit Behinderung viele Vergünstigungen, weil ihr Alltag ohnehin komplizierter ist und die Umgebung oft noch nicht vollständig barrierefrei gestaltet ist. Zum Beispiel benutzen wir mit Mindaugas häufig unser eigenes Auto, weil der öffentliche Nahverkehr für uns nicht immer einfach oder vollständig barrierefrei ist. Überall gibt es Treppen, manche Aufzüge funktionieren nicht oder sind außer Betrieb. Dadurch kann Mindaugas nie hundertprozentig sicher sein, dass er seine Fahrt auch wirklich bis zum Ziel fortsetzen kann. Ich selbst bekomme außerdem viel weniger Informationen über meine Umgebung. Es ist einfach klar, dass es ohne Sehen schwieriger ist, sich selbstständig zu bewegen. Aber Toiletten? Wenn sie ohnehin barrierefrei eingerichtet sind – warum sollten wir dann kostenlosen Zugang bekommen? Im Theater oder anderen Kulturorganisationen verstehe ich eine Ermäßigung vollkommen. Meine Wahrnehmung bleibt selbst bei einer Vorstellung mit Audiodeskription eingeschränkt, und Mindaugas kann oft nur bestimmte Plätze erreichen. Aber hier? Das ist wirklich nur eine Kleinigkeit, aber heute musste ich darüber nachdenken: Wann sind Vergünstigungen tatsächlich sinnvoll – und wann vielleicht eher nicht?
Dann brachte uns mein “schönes” Deutsch wieder einmal in eine etwas komische Situation. Eigentlich bin ich in unserer Familie ständig die Dolmetscherin. Hier in Deutschland erledige ich alle Gespräche – beim Essen, beim Einkaufen und überall dort, wo wir etwas brauchen. Mein Mann spricht kein Deutsch, und das merkt man natürlich sofort. Er kümmert sich um Mobilität und Infrastruktur, ich ums Sprechen. Diesmal gingen wir in irgendeine italienische Trattoria zum Abendessen. Ich bestellte mir eine vegetarische Pizza, und für Mindaugas... na ja... da habe ich wohl nicht besonders gut aufgepasst. Er hatte mir etwas vorgelesen, das ungefähr unter „Vorspeisen“ stand. Da er nur etwas Kleines essen wollte, bestellte ich ihm einfach irgendeine Antipasti. Und dann... ...stellte ich plötzlich fest, dass ich eigentlich gar nicht verstanden hatte, worum es sich bei diesem Gericht überhaupt handelte. Während wir auf das Essen warteten, fragte Mindaugas mich noch einmal, was genau er bestellt habe. Und ich hatte ehrlich gesagt keine klare Antwort. Ich sagte nur: „Es müsste... Fleisch sein... oder vielleicht drei verschiedene Sachen... und etwas Gemüse...“ Offensichtlich war Mindaugas mit meiner Erklärung nicht besonders zufrieden und fragte ziemlich streng, ob ich mir wirklich sicher sei, was er gleich bekommen würde. Da musste ich zugeben: eher nicht. Darauf meinte er, dass er meinen Fähigkeiten inzwischen nicht mehr ganz vertraue – besonders weil ich während meiner Erklärung selbst ständig lachen musste. Am Ende war aber alles gut. Das Essen schmeckte ihm sogar ganz ordentlich. Hoffen wir also, dass ich meine Dolmetscherarbeit in einem Monat noch ein bisschen besser mache.
Eigentlich klappt es viel besser, wenn ich mich mit Deutschen unterhalte. Sie helfen oft dabei, etwas zu erklären oder anders zu formulieren. Im Restaurant war das allerdings schwieriger, weil der Italiener selbst nicht besonders gut Deutsch sprach. Und wenn ich in asiatische Restaurants gehe, wird es manchmal sogar noch komplizierter – denn dort sprechen die Mitarbeitenden oft kaum mehr Deutsch als ich!