VVA miniserie Therapeutische Stukjes

(Deel 1 van 1)

Nog geen week geleden begon dit hele proces. Ik had iets gehoord over een stand van zaken, omstandigheden iets voor een reactie maar ik zat daar, dronk mijn oplos koffie en pas toen ik op zoek ging naar een homp koek drong het door 'Ik vind er niets van' Ik schrok behoorlijk want ik vind overal iets van. Dat is voor ons type als de natte neus van een hond, blijft dit effect na een oorzaak en een gevolg uit dan is er iets goed mis.

Meteen zat ik en zak en as, mijn leven was van een nieuwe hardcover voor de volle prijs gekocht in een echte boekenwinkel veranderd in een beduimeld exemplaar bij een kringloop winkel voor alles en ook wel eens een boekje. Het boek was qua inhoud hetzelfde maar toch helemaal anders. “Vreselijk!” citeerde ik de auteur Hubert Schimmelpenninck, onterecht onbekend gebleven, hiermee uitdrukking gevend hoe ik me op dat moment voelde. Het besef drong meteen diep door, ik zag het zelfs in de spiegel van de ziel van anderen, in hun pupillen, het klonk door in het timbre van elke stem, ik was niet langer de beste versie van mezelf nu ik zomaar op eens ergens niks van vond.

Ik had dringend hulp nodig. Ik sloeg de gouden gids open op zoek naar kennis uit het verleden en heden over mijn soort onthutsend gedrag, aanstootgevend was het zowaar ik u brom. In de gids vond ik diverse kenners op alle gebieden waaronder ook Helers gespecialiseerd in tijdelijke onverschilligheid [aanbevolen] Ik zocht naar sterren, tekens der beoordeling des waardige tijds, zodat ik de beste heler uit de reeks kon inhuren. In de papieren versie stond niks maar eenmaal aangelijnd waren er meer dan voldoende meningen over deze categorie helers te vinden. Het waren allemaal prima mensen, vak lui, met een zekere staat van dienst, dat zag ik zo, niks dan lof, zelfs al waren ze dat niet, of minder goed dan uitstekend, de nood was inmiddels zo hoog dat ik een bijna vier sterretjes therapeut gewoon wel moest accepteren. Gelukkig kon ik terecht bij iemand met bijna 5 sterren, de laatste ster was net niet tot de rand toe gevuld.

Een uur daarna had ik een afspraak voor de dag daarna, De van alles wat iets wetende man had de ernst van de situatie ingezien en alle andere afspraken naar achteren geschoven. Ergens niets van vinden is in ons reactief leven vergelijkbaar met een zwaar ongeval op de weg voor de EHBO, hele hoge nood.

DE dag daarop zat ik tegen over de therapeut, Hein, een broodmagere man, een afgetrainde duurloper waarschijnlijk en deed mijn verhaal. Hein luisterde aandachtig. Ik vertelde dat ik de radio aan had gezet en er een bericht was over een situatie in een regio op een bepaald vakgebied en dat ik amper luisterde en enkel genoot van mijn bakje oploskoffie, mijn stem brak toen ik de boodschap overbracht. De therapeut keek verschrikt, zuchtte diep, daarna deed hij snel zijn hand voor de mond, een heler mag dergelijke emoties nooit tonen aan een cliënt maar soms is het te erg. Ik kon ook zien dat Hein eigenlijk onbedaarlijk wou huilen in plaats daarvan ging hij op de vloer liggen en ademde een paar minuten diep in en uit tot kalmte was herwonnen.

Hij zei “Mijn excuses, ik had gehoopt op een minder moeilijke situatie, eentje waar ik geen nachtje over moet slapen, helaas.” Ik bood daarop mijn excuses aan en hij accepteerde deze schoorvoetend. Hij trok zijn vlinderdasje recht, rechte zijn schouders met een waterpas en sprak op gemaakt lijzige toon “U moet weten dat ik altijd mijn uiterste best doe om mensen te helpen maar ik doe geen belofte aan niemand niet, ik weet niet zeker of ik kan zorgen dat u na deze kuur nooit weer tegen iets aan loopt waar u niets van vindt echter in de meeste gevallen slaag ik er in om dit voor een zeer lange periode te voorkomen” Ik vond dit geruststellend en zei dat ook. Hein knikte waarmee hij aangaf dat ik werd gehoord. Dat deed me goed, zo vaak komt dat niet voor. Ik besloot daar gebruik van te maken door nog iets te zeggen “De crisis situatie bij Ajax gaat me na aan het hart!” Ook dit veroorzaakte een duidelijke reactie, hij drong er echter op aan om hem de ruimte te geven zijn werkplan voor mijn euvel te vertellen, uitleggen wat ik en hij allemaal moesten doen om voor op het goden gouden paadje over de tienbaans snelweg rijden zo snel mogelijk weg van OZ en zijn miniseries, het omroepland van onverschillige zaken. Nu was het mijn beurt om te knikken, en ik besloot meteen mijn kwek te houden over Ajax.

Hein liep naar een digitaal bord aangesloten op zijn mobiele telefoon. Hij liet een punt zien op een heel wit vlak en sprak “Dit is waar u zich bevindt” vervolgens liet hij een kaart van Smægmå zien en zei dit is waar we zo snel als mogelijk terug naar toe gaan. “Goden zij dank” citeerde ik weer Hubert Schimmelpenninck, mijn favoriete auteur voor citeren, zijn taal is altijd zo helder en eenvoudig, echt iemand die bij de essentie blijft en niet voortdurend afdwalen naar regionen die niks te maken hebben met hele verhaal, gewoon taal om taal te maken, daar vind ik namelijk ook niks aan.

“U bent vorige week in het nergens terecht gekomen. Het is aan mij om te ontdekken waarom maar we moeten eerst en vooral denken aan de toekomst. Het vinden van de oorzaak is niet per c noodzakelijk om het euvel in de nabije toekomst te voorkomen. Het is echter mijn taak om alles tot de bodem uit te zoek, de onderste steen van het fundament boven halen en als dat eenmaal klaar is een ander meer opleverend bouwwerk neerzetten.” Ik knikte heel erg. Hein ging voort. Op het grote scherm liet hij al pratende en wijzende zijn plan voor mij zien en vertelde daarover. “U gaat van A naar Beter, laat u niet van de wijs brengen door alle afleidingen en afslagen, gaat vermetel voort naar u doel, daar waar de rivier der eeuwige verschilligheid, betrokkenheid stroomt als een wilde en alle mensen meesleept naar het intens grote geluk der voortdurende communicatie, discussie en oproer. Het paradijs waar u sinds vorige week uit bent verstoten.” Nou ik stond op uit mijn grote luie stoel en gaf Hein een daverend ovatie, ik was om, tot nu toe dacht ik dat mijn probleem zelfs te groot was voor een zo goed als vijf sterren therapeut. Niks is minder waar.

Om daar te komen moeten we iedere week samen een paar uur doorbrengen, uw verplichte verzekering betaalt mij, eveneens verplicht, en ik praat dan tegen u, toon u het goede beeld onder andere op dit scherm en dat net zolang u het zich kunt veroorloven en tevens tot u weer 'daar' bent, wederom verscheen de kaart van Smægmå op het scherm. Ik was blij verheugd dat ik iemand had gevonden die dit voor mij over had, die iedere week een paar uur met mij door wou brengen en praten over dingen die mij nu niet bezig houden in verband met die kwalijke onverschilligheid maar er dan weer toe doen en dat we dit allemaal samen doen met mijn verzekeraar en zo zij hij dat is in feite iedereen daar, weer wijzend op de land kaart en vooral op alle bewoonde gebieden. De rest voegt verdomd weinig toe aan de staatskas en dergelijke. Al die bomen, grassen, dat water en die lucht, daar heb je verder helemaal niks aan. Hein vond overal het zijne van, dat was goed om te horen en zien, een heerlijke uitgesproken persoonlijkheid, een man van het woord met oordelen over alles uit zijn mond naar voren gebracht met alle woorden in zijn hersenen aanwezig, geweldige ervaring. Zo wou ik ook weer zijn. Ik zag ook dat het geluk bij hem er van af straalde.

Na anderhalf uur zo aanhoren wat ik allemaal moest doen en wanneer moest ik weer naar huis. Ik was een beetje huiverig dat ik daar zo meteen waarschijnlijk een moment van de dag weer op een stoel of bank zou zitten, iets zien en horen en daar dan niks vinden. Het kon altijd ooit op ieder moment van een etmaal waarheid worden, een rilling liep over en of door mijn lijf door die gedachte of misschien ook wel door de kou terwijl ik door de kou fietste van stad terug naar het dorp. Thuis gekomen volgde ik het advies van Hein en deed er alles aan om te voorkomen dat ik ergens niets van kon vinden. Ik zag een plant met een dor blaadje en zei 'Daar maak ik notitie van', ik keek naar de muur, en zei 'mooi, mooi, lekker dicht' en zo voort alsmaar bevestigend dat het er was en dat ik daar was om er iets van te vinden net zo lang alles weer normaal was op de wereld. Ieder uur deed ik digitaal verslag van mijn vorderingen op de Hein Verbeter je Wereld Applicatie, zodat hij de data die ik aanmaakte kon analyseren en we deze volgende week konden gaan bespreken. Heerlijk, al die vorderingen zei ik tegen de App, ik gaf het een 8 op een lijn van 10, dat zou de nodige gespreksstoffen opleveren, dat weet ik zeker.

Sindsdien weet ik dat ik aan mezelf moet blijven werken zodat ik een beter mens ben dan ik was en nu nog ben, opdat de wereld zich aan mij zal tonen en eenmaal daar dit dan blijft doen. Echt daar vind ik wat van en zo hoort dat.

V Dědolesu bydlel dědek jménem Prdelojza Mezera. Byl to obyčejný dědek. Měl prdel, pantofle, světničku a strach ze sov. Ne z normálních sov. Z prdelatých sov, těch, co lítají nízko, funí a dělají podivné zvuky mezi prdelí a píšťalou.

Prdelojza si byl jistý, že jednou v noci přiletí. A samozřejmě měla pravdu jeho prdel – vždycky to poznala první.

---

🌙 Noc, kdy začalo šustění

Jednou večer seděl Prdelojza u stolu, pil si čaj a snažil se ignorovat prdel, která ho varovala tichým plop. Vítr nefoukal. Vesnice spala. Ale u okna se ozvalo šššš… šššš… jako když se sova snaží být nenápadná, i když váží jako menší kozel.

Prdelojza se přikrčil. „To nic nebude,“ šeptal si. Prdel mu odpověděla hlubokým brrrrp. Varování.

A pak to přišlo.

—

Najednou se na okenici objevila obří prdel. Chlupatá, kulatá, přimáčklá na sklo jako mokrý chleba.

Sova funěla, tlačila půlkami na okno a dělala zvuk, který připomínal křížence mezi hřměním a dědkem na záchodě. Prdelojza vytřeštil oči a snažil se nevydat ani hlásek. Vlezl si tiše pod postel a ani nedutal. Vzpomněl si, že okno úplně pevně nedovřel.

Pak sova zaprděla.

Sklo zamlželo. Rámečky zaskřípaly. A Prdelojzovi došlo, že pokud něco okamžitě neudělá, ta sova se protlačí dovnitř jak teplý rohlík do kapes. Ale strach ho přimrazil prdelí k podlaze pod postelí.

---

😱 Sova vtrhne dovnitř

Okenice povolily.

Sova prolétla světničkou prdelí napřed, srazila hrnek, převrátila lavici a přistála na peřině. Působila jako zlo v peří. Svítila očima, funěla a její prdel vydávala nízké dunění, které slibovalo, že tohle neskončí dobře.

Prdelojza zařval. Prdel mu málem spadla strachy.

A pak… se ozvalo zpoza dveří nenápadné šustnutí.

---

🦡 Vstupuje jezevec

Do světničky nakráčel jezevec od sousední nory. Žádný mýtus, žádný hrdina — prostě obyčejný jezevec, co spal, dokud ho neprobudil soví smrad.

Postavil se, zavrčel… a rozběhl se přímo proti sově.

Zahryzl se jí rovnou do prdele. Sova zařvala, vyletěla vzhůru, narazila do stropu, pak do kredence a nakonec oknem pryč, nechávajíc po sobě jen peří a trauma.

Jezevec si odfrkl, otočil se na Prdelojzu a pohledem mu jasně sdělil: „Zavři si příště okno, idiote.“

A zmizel zpět do nory.

---

💤 Po boji

Prdelojza celou noc nezamhouřil oko. Světnička smrděla sovím strachem a kousancem jezevce.

Ale byl vděčný. Sově, že odešla. Jezevci, že přišel. A prdeli, že ho varovala.

Od té noci spal s okny zavřenými. A pod stolem nechával mísek s pamlskem, kdyby se jezevec rozhodl zase jednou zachránit situaci.

---

Poučení:

Když ti prdel řekne, že přiletí sova, tak přiletí. Neignoruj vlastní zadek.

cuando empezó a comer esa fruta pulposa / blanca se dió cuenta que no sabía exactamente si era chirimoya anona o guanábana pero lo que dejó fue simple / un semillero en el plato

---

Since 2012, Pat McCarthy , an Irishman, has supported over 25,000 rural Chinese students and encourages overseas Chinese to support their roots through educational giving.

As an Irish philanthropist living in China, my journey here began not in boardrooms or conference halls, but in villages, in modest classrooms, and in the quiet determination of children sitting at worn wooden desks, dreaming of a future they could barely imagine.

Through the work of the Ireland Sino Institute (爱尔兰中国研究院), a registered non-profit organisation dedicated to education, charity, cultural exchange, and community upliftment, I have had the honour of serving more than 25,000 rural students across China over the past decade. Many of these children had never spoken to a foreigner, never owned an English book, never stepped outside their county — yet inside them I saw the same spark, the same intelligence, the same dreams that live in children everywhere.

I have also met many Chinese who now live overseas — in Ireland, Europe, North America, Australia, and beyond. You are business owners, doctors, engineers, artists, academics, entrepreneurs, parents, and community leaders. You have carried China with you in your language, your values, your work ethic, and in your hearts.

But distance is a powerful thing. Life becomes busy. The connection to home grows quieter. Roots that once felt strong can begin to fade into memory.

Pictured above is Zhang Chang, the wife of Pat McCarthy, teaching rural Chinese students in Liaoning Province, China.

Today, I offer a gentle invitation.

Remember where you came from. Remember the teachers who guided you, the grandparents who sacrificed for you, the villages and cities that shaped your first identity. And if you can, in whatever way is possible for you — give back.

Giving back is not only about money. It can be as simple as helping one rural student continue their education. It can be a donation of books to a small school, a sponsored scholarship for a child whose parents work far from home, a video call to encourage a classroom, or the sharing of your professional knowledge with young people who long for guidance. Even a small gesture, given with sincerity, can change the direction of a life.

Through the Ireland Sino Institute, we have built libraries, supported teachers, provided learning materials, organised speech festivals, created cultural exchange opportunities, and stood beside communities when they needed it most. I have seen children’s eyes light up as they realise that someone, somewhere in the world, believes in them.

China’s rise has inspired the world, but in some quieter corners of the country, there are still children whose potential is waiting for someone to believe in them. That outstretched hand can also carry the spirit of overseas Chinese who never forgot where they came from.

By giving back, you are not just supporting China’s future — you are honouring your own story. You are strengthening an invisible bridge between the person you once were and the person you have become. You are showing the next generation that success is measured not only in wealth or status, but in compassion, responsibility, and remembrance.

If there is even a small voice inside you calling you back to your roots, I invite you to listen to it. Reach out. Ask questions. Reconnect. Together, we can create lasting, meaningful change.

Our non-profit school in China, registered as I Love Learning Education Centre, was created to bring hope, confidence, and opportunity to children in rural communities who would otherwise be left behind. For many of these children, access to English means access to the wider world — to jobs, scholarships, and a future that once felt out of reach.

Today, that mission continues — but it depends on the kindness of those who believe in the power of education and the importance of staying connected to one’s roots.

If you feel that connection, I invite you to stand with us.

👉 Support our campaign, “Give 1,000 Rural Children an English Education” on GlobalGiving and become part of a movement that is transforming lives, one child at a time.

© 2025 All About China News Team

Currently I thought I will have more time to write. But it looks like, that my brain is so occupied with stuff that each day I forget to write a post the previous day.

I forgot to count but it is the third fourth fifth attempt to write the post. 🙈 Hell, I also forget to pay some bills or answer some letters which are important.

I don’t know what’s happening at the moment. I’m focused on a topic but I’m so lost on other important ones and forget about them constantly.

---

56 of #100DaysToOffload
#log
Thoughts?

I went skydiving and got a couples massage with E. Today was good. Time to drive to SJ tmrw morning!

In a celebration of language, learning, and connection, the Ireland Speech Festival lit up the headquarters of the Ireland Sino Institute in Liaoning Province on November 13th and 14th, 2025. What began as a simple idea—to encourage Chinese students to explore Ireland through speech—blossomed into a heartwarming event filled with curiosity, courage, and cross-cultural friendship.

Ireland ranks first in the OECD for reading literacy and is recognized as the most highly educated countries in the world. Through initiatives like the Ireland Speech Festival, the Ireland Sino Institute proudly shares this spirit of educational excellence in China, fostering opportunities for young people to learn, express themselves, and build bridges of understanding between the two nations.

Hundreds of Chinese students delivered speeches on the theme “Exploring Ireland.” Participants first researched Ireland and wrote their speeches, then submitted audio recordings for review. Experts at the Institute provided personalized feedback before the final presentations at the festival.

Speech in Full — Ireland Speech Festival Participant

The speeches were deeply inspiring—each word carrying the warmth, sincerity, and determination of youth. What made them even more remarkable was the journey behind them. Many students travelled from remote villages around Changtu, some setting out before dawn in the bitter cold, determined to stand on that stage and share their voices. For them, this was more than a competition—it was a moment of courage, hope, and pride.

Proud Moments: Ireland Speech Festival Participants Receive Certificates of Achievement

Recognizing Excellence — Certificates of Achievement Awarded at the Ireland Speech Festival

Several participants shared that taking part was not only a personal achievement but also a source of immense joy and honor for their families and entire communities, who watched with pride as their children represented the bridge of friendship and learning between China and Ireland.

The event also welcomed participants from as far as Shenyang and even Hubei Province, further enriching the festival’s strong spirit of unity, learning, and cultural exchange.

A scholar from Hubei Normal University delivered an impassioned speech on Ireland–China cultural relations via live video link.

A true friend of Ireland who drove from Shenyang to Changtu to take part in the festival.

Participants also received Irish souvenirs as a symbol of friendship and connection between the two nations. Each item—carefully chosen to reflect Ireland’s rich culture and heritage—served as a reminder of the spirit of learning and exchange that defines the Ireland Speech Festival.

A token of friendship — Irish souvenirs gifted to celebrate cultural exchange and mutual appreciation.

For many students, these small tokens carried deep meaning, representing not only their personal achievement but also a lasting link to Ireland and the values of curiosity, creativity, and cross-cultural understanding that the event celebrates.

Pat McCarthy, Chair of the Ireland Sino Institute, was deeply honoured to explicate and recite Seamus Heaney’s poem “Scaffolding.”

Scaffolding by Seamus Heaney Explication

Pat McCarthy reflected that Heaney’s clever use of irony in this poem invites us to see familiar things in a new way and encourages critical thinking. A wall, which often symbolizes separation, is here transformed into a symbol of strength, unity, and friendship.

He noted that the poem reminds us that strong relationships are not built overnight—they take time, patience, and small acts of trust and care that accumulate over the years. In this way, the poem beautifully mirrors the friendship between Ireland and China, a relationship that has grown steadily over the past 45 years into a strong partnership capable of withstanding global challenges.

Recitation of Scaffolding

Masons, when they start upon a building, Are careful to test out the scaffolding; Make sure that planks won’t slip at busy points, Secure all ladders, tighten bolted joints.

And yet all this comes down when the job’s done, Showing off walls of sure and solid stone. So if, my dear, there sometimes seem to be Old bridges breaking between you and me,

Never fear. We may let the scaffolds fall, Confident that we have built our wall.

The renowned and talented Erhu player, Setanta McCarthy, who recently performed at the Beijing Intangible Cultural Heritage Festival, also gave a special performance at the Ireland Speech Festival. The young Irish musician played the beloved Irish melody “Danny Boy” on the traditional Chinese Erhu, creating a truly moving moment that beautifully symbolized the harmony between Irish and Chinese culture.

An unforgettable cross-cultural moment — Setanta McCarthy plays “Danny Boy” on the Chinese Erhu.

https://youtu.be/a868bzSrMFA?si=qACS_twN_8d_u30d

The Ireland Sino Institute, recognized by the China State Council, the Ministry of Education, and the Ministry of Civil Affairs, is honored to have the opportunity to contribute to rural development in China.

Since 2012, the Institute, through its philanthropic work, has provided quality education to more than 25,000 rural Chinese students and remains committed to doing even more.

Moving forward, it will continue to promote China to the world and further strengthen the cultural and economic ties between Ireland, Europe, and China.

You too can also help the children of rural China by supporting our ‘Give 1000 Rural Chinese Children a quality education’ campaign on Global Campaign.

© 2025 Pat McCarthy

Rumors of My Demise Evan Dando Audiobook read by author (2025)

Note: Part of my ongoing #AudioMemoir series reviewing author-read memoirs. Previous: Neko Case, Cameron Crowe. Coming: Wayne Kramer, Larry Charles.

The 100 Word Review of The Lemonheads' new album, Love Chant

Funny, honest, and soulful, Dando takes an unflinching look at his life as a teen punk of privilege, alterna-hunk, and dope fiend.

Examining his Boston upbringing, 120 Minutes indie rock era, and the burdens of being hot, Dando ambles through life dedicated to art and deconstruction. Stories of Gibby Haynes, Courtney Love, Keith Richards, and others intermingle with harrowing tales of the House of Shock crack den and breakdowns in Australia. 

He owns it all. No big sobriety arc or 12-step apology tour. He knows he’s hurt people and wasted time, but his warmth and talent shine.

Listen to it.

#AudioMemoir #100WordReview #Larrys100 #100DaysToOffload #EvanDando

I’ve settled into a truth I think I always knew: there’s a veil beyond this world—something I can feel, even if I can’t see it. And yet, despite that sense of something greater, I spent so much of my life feeling… lonely.

High school was especially hard. We moved away from everything and everyone I knew, straight into the countryside of the South. Everyone there had grown up together, shared roots, shared memories. And me? I was the outsider. Add puberty on top of that and you get a perfect recipe for struggle.

And LORD, it was hard to get a girl to even look my way. I took all of it personally. I internalized every rejection, every awkward moment, until my self-talk turned razor sharp and cruel. At my lowest, I wanted to end my life—until, as I’ve said before, I heard the voice of God redirect me.

I still remember prom. We paid for the limo, the tux, even the girl’s dress… and she didn’t acknowledge me the entire night. I sat in the corner—hurt, embarrassed, and broken. And it’s wild how even now, when I share that story with a friend whose daughter is going through the same thing, I still find a tear to shed. That was the cost of being “different.” Socially awkward, not that handsome in others eyes... charisma questionable but had this depth to my spirit that I couldnt find anyone to relate with. I mean in HS it's hard but when you're 15, you don't see it that way..

But here’s the light in all of this: graduating and going to college changed everything. That’s when “different” stopped feeling like a curse and started turning into something powerful—being unique.

That story… is for next time.

Prov

Dreams

I dreamed vivid dreams all my life. Dreams of heaven, dreams of the afterlife. Dreams of past lives and the future. This supported me understanding that I was “different” even more.

Scariest dream:

I believe I may have been seeing myself in a past life or living out someone else's life. But I was a woman. Brunette with short hair. Possibly 5'5 and white. In this dream I was abducted by 2 men in the woods. Just writing I can still; feel the coolness of the night air, the feeling of anxiety and distress, the tan colored car with its high beams on. I was taken out of the trunk in a trash bag tied up with zip ties. I recalled whoever these men were trying bury me. I woke up from this dream in a gasp. To this day I question when and who this was.

Happiest dream:

I went to the afterlife and felt this overwhelming sense of love all around me. All the colors and divinity was just breathtaking. Even today I still feel the warmth of this place and look forward to going back.

Prov

Why Your MSP Needs an MSP Digital Marketing Agency to Compete and Win

MSP digital marketing agency support is no longer optional for managed service providers that want to stand out in a crowded market. Buyers have changed. They research quietly, compare online, and evaluate credibility long before scheduling a call. Because of this shift, MSPs must simultaneously build trust, authority, and differentiation across multiple digital channels. Doing so consistently is challenging, especially with limited time and internal resources.

This is where a specialized partner makes the difference. A general marketing firm may understand branding, design, or SEO. However, they rarely understand co-managed IT, MDR, compliance frameworks, cybersecurity stacks, or the MSP sales cycle. That gap leads to wasted effort, weak messaging, and campaigns that fail to convert.

Equilibrium Consulting, an experienced MSP marketing agency, solves that problem by aligning messaging, brand clarity, digital strategy, and pipeline development specifically for managed service providers and IT channel organizations.

Why MSP Digital Marketing Is Different Marketing for an MSP is not the same as traditional B2B marketing. MSP buyers have complex concerns:

Business continuity

Cyber risk exposure

Compliance requirements

Financial impact of downtime

Long-term IT strategy

They are not looking for a vendor. They are looking for a partner who can reduce uncertainty and increase stability.

However, many MSPs attempt to communicate value using technical language. That approach confuses non-technical decision-makers and fails to demonstrate business outcomes. Conversely, overly simplistic messaging can turn off technical evaluators.

A specialized MSP digital marketing agency balances both audiences by translating capabilities into outcomes. This approach ensures clarity for business leaders and credibility for technical reviewers.

Why Equilibrium Consulting Is Built for MSPs

Equilibrium has spent years inside the MSP and IT channel ecosystem. The firm understands vendor programs, partner incentives, pricing shifts, cybersecurity mandates, and the evolution of managed services. Because of that, Equilibrium brings insight that general marketing agencies simply cannot match.

Equilibrium approaches marketing for MSPs through four core disciplines:

1. Strategic Positioning and Story Your MSP must answer: Why you? Why now? Equilibrium helps articulate a clear, compelling narrative that differentiates you from competitors selling similar services.

2. Website and Digital Presence Foundation A modern MSP website must guide visitors through a story. It must communicate pain points, services, trust signals, and next-step calls to action. Equilibrium structures, writes, and designs websites that convert.

3. Content That Builds Trust and Authority Consistent content signals stability and expertise. Equilibrium produces blogs, case studies, landing pages, service pages, and social content tailored specifically for MSP buyers.

4. Pipeline and Lead Development Marketing must support sales, not operate separately from them. Equilibrium builds campaigns that generate qualified conversations, not just web traffic.

The MSP Buyer Journey Has Changed

Buyers now perform 70%+ of the research before engaging with sales. Therefore, your digital footprint must address each stage of the buyer journey:

Stage Buyer Question Marketing Needed Awareness “Do I have a risk or issue?” Educational blogs, webinars, and social content Consideration “How do MSPs solve this?” Service pages, frameworks, comparison guides Decision “Why this MSP?” Case studies, testimonials, pricing philosophy Commitment “How will onboarding go?” Onboarding guides, FAQ pages, maturity frameworks

A specialized MSP marketing agency ensures no stage is overlooked.

What Happens When MSPs Try to Do This Alone

Many MSPs attempt to handle marketing internally. However, obstacles appear quickly:

No consistent brand message

Sporadic or inconsistent content publishing

Website messaging written by technical staff

No clear campaign sequencing

No measurement or lead tracking

Marketing starts and stops depending on workload

This on/off pattern creates pipeline volatility, in turn leading to revenue instability.

Marketing is not a seasonal project.

It is a system that, when run consistently, creates a predictable flow of opportunities.

A MSP digital marketing agency like Equilibrium provides that system.

What Makes Equilibrium Different

Many agencies sell deliverables.

Equilibrium sells clarity, alignment, and execution.

They don’t guess your buyer.

They map your Ideal Client Profile and personas.

They don’t produce content that sounds generic.

They capture your tone and point of view.

They don’t simply send traffic to your site.

They guide traffic into structured next steps.

Equilibrium treats marketing as a growth engine, not a task list.

The Competitive Advantage: Trust

The MSPs winning today are not always the cheapest, fastest, or most technically advanced.

They are the ones who communicate trust the most clearly. Trust is built through:

Consistent brand messaging

Professional digital presence

Case studies and customer stories

A proven onboarding experience

Market visibility and thought leadership

Equilibrium helps MSPs demonstrate these qualities in a way that resonates with decision-makers.

Final Thought

The MSP market will not get less competitive.

Automation, AI, cybersecurity consolidation, and national providers are reshaping the landscape.

To stay competitive, MSPs must differentiate through brand clarity, consistent presence, and message discipline.

Partnering with an MSP digital marketing agency like Equilibrium empowers MSPs to build authority, generate pipeline, and grow consistently—without sacrificing internal bandwidth.

Want to see how your current marketing stacks up? Schedule a no-cost ContentRX™ Review and get recommendations you can use immediately.

Visit: equilibriumconsult.com/content-rx

This artist and this song needs more views and more likes. It's so good! Love how he's keeping those emo flames alive as well.

We burn the map, we miss the turn We made every mistake you'd think we'd learn But somehow it still feels like home Even when we're lost and broke

These late night drives, the empty streets The promises we swore we'd keep I'll raise a glass to every wrong 'Cause that's the reason we belong

And maybe one day we'll forget But tonight we're not done yet

Here's to the mess we made To every plan that we betrayed To broken hearts and wasted time To knowing we'll be just fine Here's to the nights we can't replace The scars that we still wear with grace We'll scream until there's nothing left Here's to the mess, it's all we've got left

We cut our teeth on gasoline We lit the match, we chased the dream We never thought we'd make it here But chaos got us through the years So don't look back, just sing along We're not the kids we were but we're still strong We'll carry all these stupid scars Like trophies from a battle star

And maybe we'll grow up someday But for now, we'll stay this way

Here's to the mess we made To every plan that we betrayed To broken hearts and wasted time To knowing we'll be just fine Here's to the nights we can't replace The scars that we still wear with grace We'll scream until there's nothing left Here's to the mess, it's all we've got left It's all we've got left

If life's a joke, then let it play We'll laugh until it fades away And when it's gone, at least we'll know We left it all inside the show

Here's to the mess we made To every risk we weren't afraid To all the tears and all the fights To turning darkness into light Here's to the nights that built our bones The friends we found, the love we've known We'll scream until there's nothing left Here's to the mess, our beautiful mess

#skinnyfeelings #MusicVideo #EmoIsNotDead

Reason why I’m doing this

So most of this stuff doesn’t actually relate to why I started reading Daniel in the first place. It’s mostly about the crazy visions that Daniel has about the near future of regional geopolitics and the end times.

But there are still many things to be taken from the text in relation to the topic – “How can I live as a slave to Christ?”

Consistency

First off, Daniel is nothing if not consistent. His life, all the way up to the end of his life, is dedicated towards God, and everything else is secondary. God never rebukes Daniel for the sin in his life (at least in the Bible), and God continually saves Him. I’m not saying Daniel is sinless, but clearly, he never let up in his relentless pursuit of God. He practices spiritual discipline daily. He prays 3 times a day, even in the face of death for prayer.

“Now when Daniel learned that the decree had been published, he went home to his upstairs room where the windows opened toward Jerusalem. Three times a day he got down on his knees and prayed, giving thanks to his God, just as he had done before.” (Daniel 6:10)

What’s notable about this is that it mentions that he gives thanks to God daily. This is incomprehensible without a transcendental trust in God, and an attitude of abandon towards his own life. Daniel’s life was rife with political intrigue, and there are likely many more plots against him that didn’t make it into the Bible. But it doesn’t seem like they swayed his heart at all. His trust towards God did not falter, and his faith stood the test.

This cannot be explained but by the grace of God. For who can live like this with their own strength? I need to ask God for grace, that I may be as consistent and unrelenting in my pursuit for God as Daniel.

Lives a Life Blameless Before Others

Second, Daniel’s life is blameless before others. King Darius’s administrators and satraps tried to dispose of Daniel, and investigated every nook and cranny of his life as a public servant. But they could not find a single charge against him in corruption, negligence, or lack of excellence in work. He was easily the best amongst all of them. So much that King Darius put him on a fast track for promotion.

I make so many mistakes at work, some due to my own negligence. I’m also inexperienced, and have a lot to learn. I need to step it up. I’m not representing myself, I’m representing God. But for this too, I must ask for God’s grace. For who can gain ability on their own if God does not allow it?

Trusts God

Third, Daniel is distinguished in his trust towards God.

“The king was overjoyed and gave orders to lift Daniel out of the den. And when Daniel was lifted from the den, no wound was found on him, because he had trusted in his God.” (Daniel 6:23)

I’m not sure if it was intended to be interpreted in this manner, but in the English NIV translation, the verse seems to imply that Daniel was saved because he had trusted in God. So does that mean that if Daniel did not trust in God, he would not have been saved? Not necessarily, because that logical relation does not mean that he would not have been saved for another reason. But still, this trust seems to be important.

Daniel’s life is full of obstacles. God places before him various trials the moment he arrives to Babylon, and they only increase in difficulty. At each obstacle, God seems to be asking, “No matter if I save save you or not, will you still follow me? Do you still trust in my goodness? Do you love me more than you love life itself?” For us reading the Bible, and for us familiar with Daniel’s story, it seems so obvious that God had a plan, and God would continually save Daniel, proving his faithfulness. But Daniel had no idea. At every trial he faced, there was no guarantee that God would save him yet again. After all, God allows even faithful people of God to die.

Would I be able to say yes to God even when staring down the barrel? My little unfounded theory is that God doesn’t just present trials out of the blue to a believer. It doesn’t mean that trials will never not jump in difficulty and only linearly increase in difficulty, it’s just that God gives us opportunities, even small ones, every single day, to say “yes” to Him. He builds us up in faith and character using these small opportunities, and uses us accordingly. If only we say “yes” to all the small things, I have hope that He will use even the smallest things to give us the strength to say “yes” to him when the stakes become higher. This thinking is based on the following verse.

“Whoever can be trusted with very little can also be trusted with much, and whoever is dishonest with very little will also be dishonest with much” (Luke 16:10)

Every little small thing God has entrusted in my life I need to give my utmost attention to. So what are the things in my life that God has entrusted to me?

Largely,

• a job
• my church
• friends
• family
• my extra time
• my intellect
• an Internet connection
• etc.

So God has given me each of the following things for a reason, and entrusted me with them. Without Him in the picture, these are all good things that I wouldn’t know what to do with. But with Him in the picture, I now know that He has entrusted me with each of these things for a reason, and I need to understand that reason, and in joy, prayer, and petition, fulfill God’s plan in each of these areas, as a child uses a crayon to fill in the outlines given by a coloring book.

Even when reading through Daniel, I am resoundingly sure of the fact that I have not even understood 1% of the significance of this book, and of Daniel’s life. But I hope that God will use this insignificant effort of mine to understand what it means to live for Him in a great way. I look forward to the day when God shows me how He used this time spent before Him.

#slave2christ

I learn stuff from being involved with others in real life, and I value that. As rewarding as that is, I like coming home to myself at the end of the day. Some people exhaust me.

Hello and I hope you will have a Great Thanksgiving

While our military are protecting us around the world, our ignorant POTUS is too stupid to know that all military are allowed to ignore any illegal order no matter who it comes from. Perhaps it is because he never served a day in the military. Oh, those debilitating bone spurs!!! Ignoring illegal orders is not only the right of every soldier, it is their duty. Thus says the Uniform Code of Military Justice. It is not treason as POTUS thinks.

We have a government run by people who have no real experience in running a military. True it has some current members of the government that have had limited experience in the military. None have the experience to keep the nation safe, not even the secretary of defense.

Blowing up small boats and threatening Venezuela because POTUS doesn't like their head of government will never give him the experience needed to keep us safe. It will only make us more and more vulnerable. Thanks POTUS!!!

POTUS Roaster

Thanks for reading my posts. If you want to see the rest of them, please go to write.as/potusroaster/archive/

To email us send it too potusroaster@gmail.com

Please tell your family, friends and neighbors about the posts.

When the Leica M11-P camera launched in October 2023, it carried a feature that seemed almost quaint in its ambition: the ability to prove that photographs taken with it were real. The €8,500 camera embedded cryptographic signatures directly into each image at the moment of capture, creating what the company called an immutable record of authenticity. In an era when generative AI can conjure photorealistic images from text prompts in seconds, Leica's gambit represented something more profound than a marketing ploy. It was an acknowledgement that we've entered a reality crisis, and the industry knows it.

The proliferation of AI-generated content has created an authenticity vacuum. Text, images, video, and audio can now be synthesised with such fidelity that distinguishing human creation from machine output requires forensic analysis. Dataset provenance (the lineage of training data used to build AI models) remains a black box for most commercial systems. The consequences extend beyond philosophical debates about authorship into the realm of misinformation, copyright infringement, and the erosion of epistemic trust.

Three technical approaches have emerged as the most promising solutions to this crisis: cryptographic signatures embedded in content metadata, robust watermarking that survives editing and compression, and dataset registries that track the provenance of AI training data. Each approach offers distinct advantages, faces unique challenges, and requires solving thorny problems of governance and user experience before achieving the cross-platform adoption necessary to restore trust in digital content.

The Cryptographic Signature Approach

The Coalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity (C2PA) represents the most comprehensive effort to create an industry-wide standard for proving content origins. Formed in February 2021 by Adobe, Microsoft, Truepic, Arm, Intel, and the BBC, C2PA builds upon earlier initiatives including Adobe's Content Authenticity Initiative and the BBC and Microsoft's Project Origin. The coalition has grown to include over 4,500 members across industries, with Google joining the steering committee in 2024 and Meta following in September 2024.

The technical foundation of C2PA relies on cryptographically signed metadata called Content Credentials, which function like a nutrition label for digital content. When a creator produces an image, video, or audio file, the system embeds a manifest containing information about the content's origin, the tools used to create it, any edits made, and the chain of custody from creation to publication. This manifest is then cryptographically signed using digital signatures similar to those used to authenticate software or encrypted messages.

The cryptographic signing process makes C2PA fundamentally different from traditional metadata, which can be easily altered or stripped from files. Each manifest includes a cryptographic hash of the content, binding the provenance data to the file itself. If anyone modifies the content without properly updating and re-signing the manifest, the signature becomes invalid, revealing that tampering has occurred. This creates what practitioners call a tamper-evident chain of custody.

Truepic, a founding member of C2PA, implements this approach using SignServer to create verifiable cryptographic seals for every image. The company deploys EJBCA (Enterprise JavaBeans Certificate Authority) for certificate provisioning and management. The system uses cryptographic hashing (referred to in C2PA terminology as a hard binding) to ensure that both the asset and the C2PA structure can be verified later to confirm the file hasn't changed. Claim generators connect to a timestamping authority, which provides a secure signature timestamp proving that the file was signed whilst the signing certificate remained valid.

The release of C2PA version 2.1 introduced support for durable credentials through soft bindings such as invisible watermarking or fingerprinting. These soft bindings can help rediscover associated Content Credentials even if they're removed from the file, addressing one of the major weaknesses of metadata-only approaches. By combining digital watermark technology with cryptographic signatures, content credentials can now survive publication to websites and social media platforms whilst resisting common modifications such as cropping, rotation, and resizing.

Camera manufacturers have begun integrating C2PA directly into hardware. Following Leica's pioneering M11-P, the company launched the SL3-S in 2024, the first full-frame mirrorless camera with Content Credentials technology built-in and available for purchase. The cameras sign both JPG and DNG format photos using a C2PA-compliant algorithm with certificates and private keys stored in a secure chipset. Sony planned C2PA authentication for release via firmware update in the Alpha 9 III, Alpha 1, and Alpha 7S III in spring 2024, following successful field testing with the Associated Press. Nikon announced in October 2024 that it would deploy C2PA content credentials to the Z6 III camera by mid-2025.

In the news industry, adoption is accelerating. The IPTC launched Phase 1 of the Verified News Publishers List at IBC in September 2024, using C2PA technology to enable verified provenance for news media. The BBC, CBC/Radio Canada, and German broadcaster WDR currently have certificates on the list. France Télévisions completed operational adoption of C2PA in 2025, though the broadcaster required six months of development work to integrate the protocol into existing production flows.

Microsoft has embedded Content Credentials in all AI-generated images created with Bing Image Creator, whilst LinkedIn displays Content Credentials when generative AI is used, indicating the date and tools employed. Meta leverages C2PA's Content Credentials to inform the labelling of AI images across Facebook, Instagram, and Threads, providing transparency about AI-generated content. Videos created with OpenAI's Sora are embedded with C2PA metadata, providing an industry standard signature denoting a video's origin.

Yet despite this momentum, adoption remains frustratingly low. As of 2025, very little internet content uses C2PA. The path to operational and global adoption faces substantial technical and operational challenges. Typical signing tools don't verify the accuracy of metadata, so users can't rely on provenance data unless they trust that the signer properly verified it. C2PA specifications implementation is left to organisations, opening avenues for faulty implementations and leading to bugs and incompatibilities. Making C2PA compliant with every standard across all media types presents significant challenges, and media format conversion creates additional complications.

Invisible Signatures That Persist

If cryptographic signatures are the padlock on content's front door, watermarking is the invisible ink that survives even when someone tears the door off. Whilst cryptographic signatures provide strong verification when content credentials remain attached to files, they face a fundamental weakness: metadata can be stripped. Social media platforms routinely remove metadata when users upload content. Screenshots eliminate it entirely. This reality has driven the development of robust watermarking techniques that embed imperceptible signals directly into the content itself, signals designed to survive editing, compression, and transformation.

Google DeepMind's SynthID represents the most technically sophisticated implementation of this approach. Released in 2024 and made open source in October of that year, SynthID watermarks AI-generated images, audio, text, and video by embedding digital watermarks directly into the content at generation time. The system operates differently for each modality, but the underlying principle remains consistent: modify the generation process itself to introduce imperceptible patterns that trained detection models can identify.

For text generation, SynthID uses a pseudo-random function called a g-function to augment the output of large language models. When an LLM generates text one token at a time, each potential next word receives a probability score. SynthID adjusts these probability scores to create a watermark pattern without compromising the quality, accuracy, creativity, or speed of text generation. The final pattern of the model's word choices combined with the adjusted probability scores constitutes the watermark.

The system's robustness stems from its integration into the generation process rather than being applied after the fact. Detection can use either a simple Weighted Mean detector requiring no training or a more powerful Bayesian detector that does require training. The watermark survives cropping, modification of a few words, and mild paraphrasing. However, Google acknowledges significant limitations: watermark application is less effective on factual responses, and detector confidence scores decline substantially when AI-generated text is thoroughly rewritten or translated to another language.

The ngram_len parameter in SynthID Text balances robustness and detectability. Larger values make the watermark more detectable but more brittle to changes, with a length of five serving as a good default. Importantly, no additional training is required to generate watermarked text; only a watermarking configuration passed to the model. Each configuration produces unique watermarks based on keys where the length corresponds to the number of layers in the watermarking or detection models.

For audio, SynthID introduces watermarks that remain robust to many common modifications including noise additions, MP3 compression, and speed alterations. For images, the watermark can survive typical image transformations whilst remaining imperceptible to human observers.

Research presented at CRYPTO 2024 by Miranda Christ and Sam Gunn articulated a new framework for watermarks providing robustness, quality preservation, and undetectability simultaneously. These watermarks aim to provide rigorous mathematical guarantees of quality preservation and robustness to content modification, advancing beyond earlier approaches that struggled to balance these competing requirements.

Yet watermarking faces its own set of challenges. Research published in 2023 demonstrated that an attacker can post-process a watermarked image by adding a small, human-imperceptible perturbation such that the processed image evades detection whilst maintaining visual quality. Relative to other approaches for identifying AI-generated content, watermarks prove accurate and more robust to erasure and forgery, but they are not foolproof. A motivated actor can degrade watermarks through adversarial attacks and transformation techniques.

Watermarking also suffers from interoperability problems. Proprietary decoders controlled by single entities are often required to access embedded information, potentially allowing manipulation by bad actors whilst restricting broader transparency efforts. The lack of industry-wide standards makes interoperability difficult and slows broader adoption, with different watermarking implementations unable to detect each other's signatures.

The EU AI Act, which came into force in 2024 with full labelling requirements taking effect in August 2026, mandates that providers design AI systems so synthetic audio, video, text, and image content is marked in a machine-readable format and detectable as artificially generated or manipulated. A valid compliance strategy could adopt the C2PA standard combined with robust digital watermarks, but the regulatory framework doesn't mandate specific technical approaches, creating potential fragmentation as different providers select different solutions.

Tracking AI's Training Foundations

Cryptographic signatures and watermarks solve half the authenticity puzzle by tagging outputs, but they leave a critical question unanswered: where did the AI learn to create this content in the first place? Whilst C2PA and watermarking address content provenance, they don't solve the problem of dataset provenance: documenting the origins, licencing, and lineage of the training data used to build AI models. This gap has created significant legal and ethical risks. Without transparency into training data lineage, AI practitioners may find themselves out of compliance with emerging regulations like the European Union's AI Act or exposed to copyright infringement claims.

The Data Provenance Initiative, a multidisciplinary effort between legal and machine learning experts, has systematically audited and traced more than 1,800 text datasets, developing tools and standards to track the lineage of these datasets including their source, creators, licences, and subsequent use. The audit revealed a crisis in dataset documentation: licencing omission rates exceeded 70%, and error rates surpassed 50%, highlighting frequent miscategorisation of licences on popular dataset hosting sites.

The initiative released the Data Provenance Explorer at www.dataprovenance.org, a user-friendly tool that generates summaries of a dataset's creators, sources, licences, and allowable uses. Practitioners can trace and filter data provenance for popular finetuning data collections, bringing much-needed transparency to a previously opaque domain. The work represents the first large-scale systematic effort to document AI training data provenance, and the findings underscore how poorly AI training datasets are currently documented and understood.

In parallel, the Data & Trust Alliance announced eight standards in 2024 to bring transparency to dataset origins for data and AI applications. These standards cover metadata on source, legal rights, privacy, generation date, data type, method, intended use, restrictions, and lineage, including a unique metadata ID for tracking. OASIS is advancing these Data Provenance Standards through a Technical Committee developing a standardised metadata framework for tracking data origins, transformations, and compliance to ensure interoperability.

The AI and Multimedia Authenticity Standards Collaboration (AMAS), led by the World Standards Cooperation, launched papers in July 2025 to guide governance of AI and combat misinformation, recognising that interoperable standards are essential for creating a healthier information ecosystem.

Beyond text datasets, machine learning operations practitioners have developed model registries and provenance tracking systems. A model registry functions as a centralised repository managing the lifecycle of machine learning models. The process of collecting and organising model versions preserves data provenance and lineage information, providing a clear history of model development. Systems exist to extract, store, and manage metadata and provenance information of common artefacts in machine learning experiments: datasets, models, predictions, evaluations, and training runs.

Tools like DVC Studio and JFrog provide ML model management with provenance tracking. Workflow management systems such as Kepler, Galaxy, Taverna, and VisTrails embed provenance information directly into experimental workflows. The PROV-MODEL specifications and RO-Crate specifications offer standardised approaches for capturing provenance of workflow runs, enabling researchers to document not just what data was used but how it was processed and transformed.

Yet registries face adoption challenges. Achieving repeatability and comparability of ML experiments requires understanding the metadata and provenance of artefacts produced in ML workloads, but many practitioners lack incentives to meticulously document their datasets and models. Corporate AI labs guard training data details as competitive secrets. Open-source projects often lack resources for comprehensive documentation. The decentralised nature of dataset creation and distribution makes centralised registry approaches difficult to enforce.

Without widespread adoption of registry standards, achieving comprehensive dataset provenance remains an aspirational goal rather than an operational reality.

The Interoperability Impasse

Technical excellence alone cannot solve the provenance crisis. The governance challenges surrounding cross-platform adoption may prove more difficult than the technical ones. Creating an effective provenance ecosystem requires coordination across competing companies, harmonisation across different regulatory frameworks, and the development of trust infrastructures that span organisational boundaries.

Interoperability stands as the central governance challenge. C2PA specifications leave implementation details to organisations, creating opportunities for divergent approaches that undermine the standard's promise of universal compatibility. Different platforms may interpret the specifications differently, leading to bugs and incompatibilities. Media format conversion introduces additional complications, as transforming content from one format to another whilst preserving cryptographically signed metadata requires careful technical coordination.

Watermarking suffers even more acutely from interoperability problems. Proprietary decoders controlled by single entities restrict broader transparency efforts. A watermark embedded by Google's SynthID cannot be detected by a competing system, and vice versa. This creates a balancing act: companies want proprietary advantages from their watermarking technologies, but universal adoption requires open standards that competitors can implement.

The fragmentary regulatory landscape compounds these challenges. The EU AI Act mandates labelling of AI-generated content but doesn't prescribe specific technical approaches. Each statute references provenance standards such as C2PA or IPTC's metadata framework, potentially turning compliance support into a primary purchase criterion for content creation tools. However, compliance requirements vary across jurisdictions. What satisfies European regulators may differ from requirements emerging in other regions, forcing companies to implement multiple provenance systems or develop hybrid approaches.

Establishing and signalling content provenance remains complex, with considerations varying based on the product or service. There's no silver bullet solution for all content online. Working with others in the industry is critical to create sustainable and interoperable solutions. Partnering is essential to increase overall transparency as content travels between platforms, yet competitive dynamics often discourage the cooperation necessary for true interoperability.

For C2PA to reach its full potential, widespread ecosystem adoption must become the norm rather than the exception. This requires not just technical standardisation but also cultural and organisational shifts. News organisations must consistently use C2PA-enabled tools and adhere to provenance standards. Social media platforms must preserve and display Content Credentials rather than stripping metadata. Content creators must adopt new workflows that prioritise provenance documentation.

France Télévisions' experience illustrates the operational challenges of adoption. Despite strong institutional commitment, the broadcaster required six months of development work to integrate C2PA into existing production flows. Similar challenges await every organisation attempting to implement provenance standards, creating a collective action problem: the benefits of provenance systems accrue primarily when most participants adopt them, but each individual organisation faces upfront costs and workflow disruptions.

The governance challenges extend beyond technical interoperability into questions of authority and trust. Who certifies that a signer properly verified metadata before creating a Content Credential? Who resolves disputes when provenance claims conflict? What happens when cryptographic keys are compromised or certificates expire? These questions require governance structures, dispute resolution mechanisms, and trust infrastructures that currently don't exist at the necessary scale.

Integration of different data sources, adoption of standard formats for provenance information, and protection of sensitive metadata from unauthorised access present additional governance hurdles. Challenges include balancing transparency (necessary for provenance verification) against privacy (necessary for protecting individuals and competitive secrets). A comprehensive provenance system for journalistic content might reveal confidential sources or investigative techniques. A dataset registry might expose proprietary AI training approaches.

Governments and organisations worldwide recognise that interoperable standards like those proposed by C2PA are essential for creating a healthier information ecosystem, but recognition alone doesn't solve the coordination problems inherent in building that ecosystem. Standards to verify authenticity and provenance will provide policymakers with technical tools essential to cohesive action, yet political will and regulatory harmonisation remain uncertain.

The User Experience Dilemma

Even if governance challenges were solved tomorrow, widespread adoption would still face a fundamental user experience problem: effective authentication creates friction, and users hate friction. The tension between security and usability has plagued authentication systems since the dawn of computing, and provenance systems inherit these challenges whilst introducing new complications.

Two-factor authentication adds friction to the login experience but improves security. The key is implementing friction intentionally, balancing security requirements against user tolerance. An online banking app should have more friction in the authentication experience than a social media app. Yet determining the appropriate friction level for content provenance systems remains an unsolved design challenge.

For content creators, provenance systems introduce multiple friction points. Photographers must ensure their cameras are properly configured to embed Content Credentials. Graphic designers must navigate new menus and options in photo editing software to maintain provenance chains. Video producers must adopt new rendering workflows that preserve cryptographic signatures. Each friction point creates an opportunity for users to take shortcuts, and shortcuts undermine the system's effectiveness.

The strategic use of friction becomes critical. Some friction is necessary and even desirable: it signals to users that authentication is happening, building trust in the system. Passwordless authentication removes login friction by eliminating the need to recall and type passwords, yet it introduces friction elsewhere such as setting up biometric authentication and managing trusted devices. The challenge is placing friction where it provides security value without creating abandonment.

Poor user experience can lead to security risks. Users taking shortcuts and finding workarounds can compromise security by creating entry points for bad actors. Most security vulnerabilities tied to passwords are human: people reuse weak passwords, write them down, store them in spreadsheets, and share them in insecure ways because remembering and managing passwords is frustrating and cognitively demanding. Similar dynamics could emerge with provenance systems if the UX proves too burdensome.

For content consumers, the friction operates differently. Verifying content provenance should be effortless, yet most implementations require active investigation. Users must know that Content Credentials exist, know how to access them, understand what the credentials indicate, and trust the verification process. Each step introduces cognitive friction that most users won't tolerate for most content.

Adobe's Content Authenticity app, launched in 2025, attempts to address this by providing a consumer-facing tool for examining Content Credentials. However, asking users to download a separate app and manually check each piece of content creates substantial friction. Some propose browser extensions that automatically display provenance information, but these require installation and may slow browsing performance.

The 2025 Accelerator project proposed by the BBC, ITN, and Media Cluster Norway aims to create an open-source tool to stamp news content at publication and a consumer-facing decoder to accelerate C2PA uptake. The success of such initiatives depends on reducing friction to near-zero for consumers whilst maintaining the security guarantees that make provenance verification meaningful.

Balancing user experience and security involves predicting which transactions come from legitimate users. If systems can predict with reasonable accuracy that a user is legitimate, they can remove friction from their path. Machine learning can identify anomalous behaviour suggesting manipulation whilst allowing normal use to proceed without interference. However, this introduces new dependencies: the ML models themselves require training data, provenance tracking for their datasets, and ongoing maintenance.

The fundamental UX challenge is that provenance systems invert the normal security model. Traditional authentication protects access to resources: you prove your identity to gain access. Provenance systems protect the identity of resources: the content proves its identity to you. Users have decades of experience with the former and virtually none with the latter. Building intuitive interfaces for a fundamentally new interaction paradigm requires extensive user research, iterative design, and patience for user adoption.

Barriers to Scaling

The technical sophistication of C2PA, watermarking, and dataset registries contrasts sharply with their minimal real-world deployment. Understanding the barriers preventing these solutions from scaling reveals structural challenges that technical refinements alone cannot overcome.

Cost represents an immediate barrier. Implementing C2PA requires investment in new software tools, hardware upgrades for cameras and other capture devices, workflow redesign, staff training, and ongoing maintenance. For large media organisations, these costs may be manageable, but for independent creators, small publishers, and organisations in developing regions, they present significant obstacles. Leica's M11-P costs €8,500; professional news organisations can absorb such expenses, but citizen journalists cannot.

The software infrastructure necessary for provenance systems remains incomplete. Whilst Adobe's Creative Cloud applications support Content Credentials, many other creative tools do not. Social media platforms must modify their upload and display systems to preserve and show provenance information. Content management systems must be updated to handle cryptographic signatures. Each modification requires engineering resources and introduces potential bugs.

The chicken-and-egg problem looms large: content creators won't adopt provenance systems until platforms support them, whilst platforms won't prioritise support until substantial content includes provenance data. Breaking this deadlock requires coordinated action, but coordinating across competitive commercial entities proves difficult without regulatory mandates or strong market incentives.

Regulatory pressure may provide the catalyst. The EU AI Act's requirement that AI-generated content be labelled by August 2026, with penalties reaching €15 million or 3% of global annual turnover, creates strong incentives for compliance. However, the regulation doesn't mandate specific technical approaches, potentially fragmenting the market across multiple incompatible solutions. Companies might implement minimal compliance rather than comprehensive provenance systems, satisfying the letter of the law whilst missing the spirit.

Technical limitations constrain scaling. Watermarks, whilst robust to many transformations, can be degraded or removed through adversarial attacks. No watermarking system achieves perfect robustness, and the arms race between watermark creators and attackers continues to escalate. Cryptographic signatures, whilst strong when intact, offer no protection once metadata is stripped. Dataset registries face the challenge of documenting millions of datasets created across distributed systems without centralised coordination.

The metadata verification problem presents another barrier. C2PA signs metadata but doesn't verify its accuracy. A malicious actor could create false Content Credentials claiming an AI-generated image was captured by a camera. Whilst cryptographic signatures prove the credentials weren't tampered with after creation, they don't prove the initial claims were truthful. Building verification systems that check metadata accuracy before signing requires trusted certification authorities, introducing new centralisation and governance challenges.

Platform resistance constitutes perhaps the most significant barrier. Social media platforms profit from engagement, and misinformation often drives engagement. Whilst platforms publicly support authenticity initiatives, their business incentives may not align with aggressive provenance enforcement. Stripping metadata during upload simplifies technical systems and reduces storage costs. Displaying provenance information adds interface complexity. Platforms join industry coalitions to gain positive publicity whilst dragging their feet on implementation.

Content Credentials were selected by Time magazine as one of their Best Inventions of 2024, generating positive press for participating companies. Yet awards don't translate directly into deployment. The gap between announcement and implementation can span years, during which the provenance crisis deepens.

Cultural barriers compound technical and economic ones. Many content creators view provenance tracking as surveillance or bureaucratic overhead. Artists value creative freedom and resist systems that document their processes. Whistleblowers and activists require anonymity that provenance systems might compromise. Building cultural acceptance requires demonstrating clear benefits that outweigh perceived costs, a challenge when the primary beneficiaries differ from those bearing implementation costs.

The scaling challenge ultimately reflects a tragedy of the commons. Everyone benefits from a trustworthy information ecosystem, but each individual actor faces costs and frictions from contributing to that ecosystem. Without strong coordination mechanisms such as regulatory mandates, market incentives, or social norms, the equilibrium trends towards under-provision of provenance infrastructure.

Incremental Progress in a Fragmented Landscape

Despite formidable challenges, progress continues. Each new camera model with built-in Content Credentials represents a small victory. Each news organisation adopting C2PA establishes precedent. Each dataset added to registries improves transparency. The transformation won't arrive through a single breakthrough but through accumulated incremental improvements.

Near-term opportunities lie in high-stakes domains where provenance value exceeds implementation costs. Photojournalism, legal evidence, medical imaging, and financial documentation all involve contexts where authenticity carries premium value. Focusing initial deployment on these domains builds infrastructure and expertise that can later expand to general-purpose content.

The IPTC Verified News Publishers List exemplifies this approach. By concentrating on news organisations with strong incentives for authenticity, the initiative creates a foundation that can grow as tools mature and costs decline. Similarly, scientific publishers requiring provenance documentation for research datasets could accelerate registry adoption within academic communities before broader rollout.

Technical improvements continue to enhance feasibility. Google's decision to open-source SynthID in October 2024 enables broader experimentation and community development. Adobe's release of open-source tools for Content Credentials in 2022 empowered third-party developers to build provenance features into their applications. Open-source development accelerates innovation whilst reducing costs and vendor lock-in concerns.

Standardisation efforts through organisations like OASIS and the World Standards Cooperation provide crucial coordination infrastructure. The AI and Multimedia Authenticity Standards Collaboration brings together stakeholders across industries and regions to develop harmonised approaches. Whilst standardisation processes move slowly, they build consensus essential for interoperability.

Regulatory frameworks like the EU AI Act create accountability that market forces alone might not generate. As implementation deadlines approach, companies will invest in compliance infrastructure that can serve broader provenance goals. Regulatory fragmentation poses challenges, but regulatory existence beats regulatory absence when addressing collective action problems.

The hybrid approach combining cryptographic signatures, watermarking, and fingerprinting into durable Content Credentials represents technical evolution beyond early single-method solutions. This layered defence acknowledges that no single approach provides complete protection, but multiple complementary methods create robustness. As these hybrid systems mature and user interfaces improve, adoption friction should decline.

Education and awareness campaigns can build demand for provenance features. When consumers actively seek verified content and question unverified sources, market incentives shift. News literacy programmes, media criticism, and transparent communication about AI capabilities contribute to cultural change that enables technical deployment.

The question isn't whether comprehensive provenance systems are possible (they demonstrably are) but whether sufficient political will, market incentives, and social pressure will accumulate to drive adoption before the authenticity crisis deepens beyond repair. The technical pieces exist. The governance frameworks are emerging. The pilot projects demonstrate feasibility. What remains uncertain is whether the coordination required to scale these solutions globally will materialise in time.

We stand at an inflection point. The next few years will determine whether cryptographic signatures, watermarking, and dataset registries become foundational infrastructure for a trustworthy digital ecosystem or remain niche tools used by specialists whilst synthetic content floods an increasingly sceptical public sphere. Leica's €8,500 camera that proves photos are real may seem like an extravagant solution to a philosophical problem, but it represents something more: a bet that authenticity still matters, that reality can be defended, and that the effort to distinguish human creation from machine synthesis is worth the cost.

The outcome depends not on technology alone but on choices: regulatory choices about mandates and standards, corporate choices about investment and cooperation, and individual choices about which tools to use and which content to trust. The race to prove what's real has begun. Whether we win remains to be seen.

---

Sources and References

C2PA and Content Credentials: – Coalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity (C2PA) official specifications and documentation at c2pa.org – Content Authenticity Initiative documentation at contentauthenticity.org – Digimarc. “C2PA 2.1: Strengthening Content Credentials with Digital Watermarks.” Corporate blog, 2024. – France Télévisions C2PA operational adoption case study, EBU Technology & Innovation, August 2025

Watermarking Technologies: – Google DeepMind. “SynthID: Watermarking AI-Generated Content.” Official documentation, 2024. – Google DeepMind. “SynthID Text” GitHub repository, October 2024. – Christ, Miranda and Gunn, Sam. “Provable Robust Watermarking for AI-Generated Text.” Presented at CRYPTO 2024. – Brookings Institution. “Detecting AI Fingerprints: A Guide to Watermarking and Beyond.” 2024.

Dataset Provenance: – The Data Provenance Initiative. Data Provenance Explorer. Available at dataprovenance.org – MIT Media Lab. “A Large-Scale Audit of Dataset Licensing & Attribution in AI.” Published in Nature Machine Intelligence, 2024. – Data & Trust Alliance. “Data Provenance Standards v1.0.0.” 2024. – OASIS Open. “Data Provenance Standards Technical Committee.” 2025.

Regulatory Framework: – European Union. Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (EU AI Act). Official Journal of the European Union. – European Parliament. “Generative AI and Watermarking.” EPRS Briefing, 2023.

Industry Implementations: – BBC Research & Development. “Project Origin” documentation at originproject.info – Microsoft Research. “Project Origin” technical documentation. – Adobe Blog. Various announcements regarding Content Authenticity Initiative partnerships, 2022-2024. – Meta Platforms. “Meta Joins C2PA Steering Committee.” Press release, September 2024. – Truepic. “Content Integrity: Ensuring Media Authenticity.” Technical blog, 2024.

Camera Manufacturers: – Leica Camera AG. M11-P and SL3-S Content Credentials implementation documentation, 2023-2024. – Sony Corporation. Alpha series C2PA implementation announcements and Associated Press field testing results, 2024. – Nikon Corporation. Z6 III Content Credentials firmware update announcement, Adobe MAX, October 2024.

News Industry: – IPTC. “Verified News Publishers List Phase 1.” September 2024. – Time Magazine. “Best Inventions of 2024” (Content Credentials recognition).

Standards Bodies: – AI and Multimedia Authenticity Standards Collaboration (AMAS), World Standards Cooperation, July 2025. – IPTC Media Provenance standards documentation.

---

Tim Green UK-based Systems Theorist & Independent Technology Writer

Tim explores the intersections of artificial intelligence, decentralised cognition, and posthuman ethics. His work, published at smarterarticles.co.uk, challenges dominant narratives of technological progress while proposing interdisciplinary frameworks for collective intelligence and digital stewardship.

His writing has been featured on Ground News and shared by independent researchers across both academic and technological communities.

ORCID: 0009-0002-0156-9795 Email: tim@smarterarticles.co.uk