Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Mauris commodo felis ipsum, eget venenatis turpis elementum dapibus. Donec ullamcorper, odio vitae egestas gravida, augue nunc sodales ante, dictum elementum tortor sem a est. Interdum et malesuada fames ac ante ipsum primis in faucibus. Aliquam vestibulum pulvinar sem, ac semper libero rhoncus at. Morbi condimentum vulputate tortor non blandit. Nullam ante nisi, iaculis sagittis ornare et, molestie eu ipsum. Nulla eget sapien ac nisi mattis finibus eu ut nulla. Nullam scelerisque ex ac consequat tristique. Aliquam erat volutpat. Praesent elit nisi, feugiat vel est sit amet, varius fermentum erat. Aenean lacinia quam lacus, eu tincidunt nulla pharetra a. Cras ultricies, risus vel malesuada molestie, lectus lorem tempor enim, feugiat gravida orci odio non augue. Nunc pretium maximus mauris feugiat tempor. Etiam eget mollis nisl. Morbi vel mauris augue.

Cras in molestie eros, sit amet tristique risus. Vivamus quis orci hendrerit, ultricies mauris eu, varius urna. Sed quis sapien nec diam tincidunt ultricies. Fusce eget vehicula diam, vel semper nisl. Quisque at orci sit amet sem sodales scelerisque. Class aptent taciti sociosqu ad litora torquent per conubia nostra, per inceptos himenaeos. Etiam a erat ullamcorper, mattis sem in, commodo enim. Etiam id nibh sed urna venenatis varius. Aliquam sagittis lorem est, eu interdum purus ultrices et. Vestibulum tortor eros, elementum vitae arcu non, sollicitudin eleifend massa. Etiam tincidunt turpis sed pretium volutpat. Ut non urna sem. Integer dapibus faucibus libero, ut vestibulum enim placerat vitae. Suspendisse luctus magna nulla.

Aliquam sit amet tincidunt nunc. Donec pulvinar sit amet arcu vitae aliquet. Donec placerat facilisis pharetra. Sed id vestibulum lacus, ut faucibus risus. Donec quis erat aliquam, faucibus ligula sed, vulputate mauris. Morbi vitae justo ac augue fermentum blandit. Donec at egestas augue, auctor pretium nulla. Fusce egestas nulla a iaculis convallis. Integer pretium malesuada porta. Maecenas interdum molestie egestas. Quisque vitae ligula vel lectus lobortis vehicula. Vestibulum faucibus risus ut dictum suscipit.

Vivamus posuere ipsum sit amet magna vestibulum lacinia eget eu neque. Sed fermentum sit amet quam ac tempor. Cras eget pellentesque lectus. Fusce euismod odio vel ornare eleifend. Sed ultricies vehicula tellus, vel bibendum nibh facilisis id. Suspendisse potenti. Aliquam hendrerit magna quis gravida tempor. Etiam consectetur sodales sem, vitae imperdiet sapien consectetur eget. In commodo elit bibendum gravida porta. Phasellus sit amet iaculis orci. Curabitur eget ultricies libero.

Nulla hendrerit est et rutrum ultrices. Aliquam hendrerit leo eu velit porttitor vestibulum. Integer sit amet tortor ut leo sagittis fermentum. Nunc eget libero et purus efficitur molestie nec a augue. Sed nulla urna, dictum sit amet metus sit amet, ullamcorper consectetur dui. Praesent feugiat, nisl non mollis porttitor, mauris augue pellentesque lorem, eget ultrices felis sapien a enim. Vivamus magna ligula, faucibus et eros et, finibus fermentum urna. Suspendisse rutrum laoreet risus, quis ultrices metus malesuada vel. Nulla nec sapien id risus tempor consequat nec vitae ipsum. Curabitur purus diam, pulvinar vel posuere vitae, viverra hendrerit nisl. Nulla rutrum ex a ipsum maximus viverra. Nunc venenatis nec leo in viverra. Nullam quis dapibus nisi.

Chers amis,

 

Ce qui va suivre ne sera que digressions, mais j’ai besoin d’écrire tout cela, n’en déplaise à certains.

Depuis près de deux ans, je me fais de plus en plus discret sur les réseaux et « dans le milieu » en général. Beaucoup d’entre vous ne s’en étaient d’ailleurs pas aperçus, ce qui démontre l’intérêt tout relatif de mon action et me conduit à beaucoup d’humilité. Je suis fatigué par ce que j’observe en boucle sur les réseaux sociaux, intarissable source d’énervement, de commentaires réactionnels et de sentiment d’impuissance. Progressivement, j’en ai eu marre de participer à nourrir ce flux constant de mauvaises nouvelles et de leurs commentaires, souvent justes, mais qui n’apporte plus grand-chose au débat d’idée. Je l’ai fait pendant de nombreuses années, car pendant longtemps, aucun grand média ne parlait du réel ailleurs que sur les réseaux. C’est nettement moins le cas aujourd’hui.

Par ailleurs, j’estime avoir fait ma part du travail pour populariser nos idées en ayant été, depuis 2012, une modeste, mais active, voix de la « dissidence » numérique. J’ai fait un peu de politique, beaucoup de militantisme, j’ai été chroniqueur et journaliste, conduit des interviews de personnalités de notre camp et des produits des matinales en direct. J‘ai créé deux médias, dont un média papier. L’ensemble de mon travail a cumulé plus de cent millions de vues. J’ai aussi théorisé quelques concepts, dont certains ont été repris par un illustre écrivain, ce qui fait ma fierté, écrit quelques livres, comme tant d’autres. J’ai toujours refusé, néanmoins, de verser dans le buzz provocateur, grossier et facile qui attire l’attention des grands médias et vous emmène rapidement sur des plateaux télé, chose que je n’ai jamais souhaité faire. Il faut des gens pour porter nos idées, mais nous assistons à une sorte de dérive qui consiste en la commentairisation continue de la vie politique française, ne laissant presque aucune place à l’analyse profonde et encore moins à l’action. Nos idées ont enfin l’accès aux grands médias et on ne peut que s’en réjouir, mais il faut prendre garde à ce que le piège médiatique ne se referme pas contre nous en faisant des porteurs de nos idées un épouvantail que le camp idéologique adverse utilisera comme tremplin pour se maintenir au pouvoir, avec l’aide des médias, comme toujours.  

Aujourd’hui, le constat de la situation de la France, de l’Europe et du monde Blanc est largement dressé et partagé par un nombre croissant de personnes et de personnalités. On peut désormais entendre sur des chaînes de grande écoute ce qui m’a valu d’être banni, comme d’autres, plusieurs fois des réseaux sociaux ou de concours littéraires. Mais j’ai besoin de passer à autre chose que de constater la réalité ou commenter l’actualité. Je veux agir concrètement pour participer à construire demain. Je ne sais pas encore comment ni avec quels moyens, mais j’y travaille discrètement, intensément.

Par ailleurs, j’observe avec un certain détachement, voire une certaine gêne, la starification, voire l’instagramification, de nouvelles égéries de la droite identitaire ou « patriote », omniprésente sur les plateaux télé, dans des émissions sur YouTube ou sur d’autres plateformes qui font des millions de vues. Ce sont eux qui représentent nos idées auprès du grand public et quelques-uns le font très bien, Dieu merci. Mais je déplore cette dérive générale de la promotion de l’ego au détriment de la cause. La nature humaine est ainsi faite. Les gens préféreront toujours le buzz sale à l’analyse profonde, la légèreté à la gravité, le paraître à l’être. Mais quand je parcours mes réseaux sociaux, c’est trop souvent pour y découvrir des gens de notre camp se (nous) ridiculiser par des postures sportives vulgaires et maladroites, des photos d’instaputes patriotes ou de publications de Saint-sauveur-des-Français pleines d’autosatisfaction. D’autres font de l’argent en surjouant le patriotisme saucisson-pinard auprès de la frange bourgeoise parisienne qui y découvre le pâté de foie. Enfin, certains réseaux comme Facebook sont truffés de comptes patribeauf préférant jouer la carte « patriote, mais anti-raciste » imposée par le logiciel gauchiste, les amenant à nier férocement les effets des grand et petit remplacements.

En faisant ce constat, je me dis par ailleurs que je suis heureux d’avoir toujours été une sorte d’électron libre dans ce milieu où l’entregent et le copinage ne font pas moins de ravages qu’ailleurs. Les cercles y sont très fermés et on n’y entre que par asservissement moral, intérêt matériel mutuel ou culte de la personnalité pour celui ou celle qui les tient. Comme partout ailleurs, les relations sincères et amicales y sont rares : l’« Influenceur » fait tout pour rester au centre de l’attention et quand il donne, c’est pour mieux recevoir ou pour affirmer que l’on devient son débiteur. Il ne partage la couverture médiatique avec un « concurrent » que s’il y trouve un intérêt direct, immédiat ou stratégique. Je reproche à beaucoup de ces « influenceurs » (qui d’ailleurs n’en sont pas, ce sont plutôt des catalyseurs d’émotions) de n’exister qu’à travers leurs abonnés, tant médiatiquement, moralement que financièrement. Et c’est la grande faiblesse de leur modèle économique, certes contraint par un système qui nous marginalise encore trop. Combien peuvent vraiment se targuer d’être indépendants et d’avoir une vie en dehors de leur activité militante sur les réseaux ? Il n’existe pas de liberté de parole sans véritable indépendance financière. Nous sommes tous contraints par cette réalité, moi y compris, mais lorsque 100 % de vos revenus proviennent d’un parti politique, d’une entité idéologique ou d’une solide base d’abonnés-souscripteurs, vous êtes tenus, à un moment ou à un autre, d’adapter votre discours à votre base militante et/ou à vos mécènes. Les exceptions sont rares. Je pense notamment à des gens comme Daniel Conversano qui n’a jamais travesti ses pensées ni son discours pour plaire à un auditoire. C’est d’ailleurs le paradoxe dans lequel certains « infuenceurs » sont piégés : ils n’accèdent à un auditoire plus large que s’ils acceptent d’adapter leur discours et de renoncer à certains aspects de leur idéologie. C’est le prix à payer pour accéder aux grands médias, mais à quoi bon si c’est pour y tenir des discours tièdes et déjà servis par d’autres ? Le dissident authentique est condamné à le rester. C’est pour cette raison que j’ai un intérêt soutenu pour certains comptes au faible nombre d’abonnés sur X, souvent anonymes, dont la force des analyses et des commentaires dépasse souvent la meilleure de mes publications. Pourquoi ? Parce qu’ils sont pertinents, intelligents, clairs, directs et surtout LIBRES ET INDÉPENDANTS dans leur expression.

J’ai souvent eu l’occasion de participer à quelques évènements et soirées avec les personnes les plus en vue de notre milieu. Toujours en recherche d’échanges sincères et désintéressés, j’ai trop souvent pu observer le bal des faux-culs, comme toujours dans ce genre d’évènement. Notre milieu n’échappe pas à la règle. Oh bien sûr, j’y ai fait des rencontres mémorables avec des gens plus ou moins connus, très sympathiques, simples et sincères (coucou Peno). Mais rares sont ceux qui affichent ces trois qualités. La majorité d’entre eux vous parle avec de plus en plus de détachement à mesure que leur popularité dépasse la vôtre (ce qui arrive très vite dans mon cas mdr). Je me souviens d’une personne qui, connaissant un succès modeste, mais grandissant, sur les réseaux, me demandait régulièrement des conseils ou mon avis sur telle ou telle de ses publications ou sur une action qu’elle envisageait pour s’assurer de faire le buzz. Son succès devenant assez fulgurant, elle a fini par m’accorder un simple hochement de tête, discret, alors qu’elle écoutait attentivement ses nouveaux admirateurs la féliciter pour sa dernière prestation sur un plateau de télévision. Dans notre milieu, je l’ai déjà souligné, il existe beaucoup de clans et d’individualités qui se connaissent très peu, voire pas du tout, ne se parle presque pas, certainement par peur de se faire bouffer ses followers par son « concurrent », puisque beaucoup voient les choses ainsi. Cela dit, des groupes se forment, plus souvent par intérêt que par affinités, mais logique reste clanique. On intègre aussi facilement un clan que l’on peut en être répudié.

J’ai également assisté de l’intérieur à un phénomène intéressant, celui de la sororité militante avec tout ce qu’elle a de plus hypocrite et artificiel derrière les beaux discours sous exposition médiatique. J’y ai observé à cette occasion l’avènement de deux repenties de l’ultra-gauchisme venues nous servir de la soupe identitaire et nous apprendre la vie comme si on les avait attendues. Pis, on offre à ces parvenues une tribune dorée, alors qu’elles nous crachaient dessus hier encore, nous ayant laissé prendre tous les coups, dont les leurs, pour venir ensuite surfer sur la nouvelle vague identitaire à moindre risque, une fois que nous avons fait le travail contre vents et marées. Comment croire en la sincérité de ces apostats du pire des gauchismes, du féminisme le plus crade ? Et quand bien même ce couple d’improbables femellistes serait-il absolument sincère dans sa démarche, comment expliquer que les médias de notre camp leur offre davantage de crédit et de tribune, sur leur simple déclaration de repentance, qu’à des gens comme Julien Rochedy dont le discours est très audible et la sincérité militante n’est plus à démontrer ? On aime ou pas sa personnalité, mais son discours est souvent impeccable et on peut s’interroger sur son absence des plateaux télé ou radio où il serait un chroniqueur qui remonte sérieusement le niveau. Mais Rochedy conserve et entretient les codes des hommes de l’Ancien Monde, le monde digne et moral, celui que le monde médiatique exècre, lui préférant des influenceuses au franc-parler de poissonnière ou des pseudo-intellectuels servant de la soupe prêt-à-penser sur leur plateau.

Ne vous y trompez pas, je ne suis fâché avec personne. J’exprime simplement un sentiment de retenue et de détachement vis-à-vis d’un milieu dans lequel je ne me reconnais pas toujours et auquel on m’associe parfois.

Je suis libre et n’appartiens à aucun clan, aucune chapelle. Mon parti, c’est l’avenir de notre civilisation, de nos enfants au sein de cette civilisation.

Hello metal heads!!

Problems: it’s ok to let go of them for a while, to go on an adventurous journey. They’ll be there when I get back, that’s for certain.

Of course I’m open to aroma therapy, ethereal oils or whatever, it’s just I have no sense of smell most days.

That’s too bad, may I feel sorry for myself for having had no sense of smell, for example? — I think not.

I think not.

But why? Realistically, I ought to be able to complain about stuff, even if I’m not the elephant man!

It SUCKS to have no smell!

There.

That feels good to get out of my system! I wonder what I’ll complain about next?

Thing is I’ve been having this small devil on my shoulder, advising me.

I’ll start listening to this devil more, because I believe it’s in my own self interest.

See you in hell, then!

Thing is that it isn’t even a devil, but rather some awesome force to be reckoned with, beyond good or evil.

But if i listen to this voice more, people will like me less!

Good riddance!

como el pájaro de la luz en el ghetto por el jargon de las sombras así de algunos lugares cuesta salir como la sombra lo intenta abrazada a la extraña claridad

The days of springing out of bed and getting right to it are long behind me. I now require about 30-60 minutes of coffee-consumption in complete silence while staring out into nothing first thing in the morning. I then get about 30-60 minutes of exercise before breakfast, a 30-minute tidy up, and a shower. That's 3-4 hours first thing in the morning gone towards nothing of major significance.

Which is why I set my alarm clock to 6am every morning now. I'm hoping a couple weeks in and my internal clock will be adjusted enough to do away with the alarm altogether.

I loathe waking up to an alarm.

#journal

I did nothing today. Not even the gym. I honestly feel pretty ashamed and bad.

My name is W1tN3ss (code for Witness). I have mostly observed in my life and stated in a non-boastful manner -I am a good observer.

I notice.

I notice everything.

I notice micro-reactions.

I have been this way since I was a pre-teen (now in my 50’s). As a pre teen, I once watched my neighbor repair his car from my bedroom window. I had a notepad and pen in hand, jotting my observations. I just absorbed the moment to see what details I could gather. I own a ton of journals and books, writing was always a part of me.

I am of South Asian Indian decent but born and raised in the United States. This particular community was heavily influenced by Christianity; specifically going back to when St Thomas arrived to India. This form of Christianity was strict, more notably connected to Pentecostal Christianity. The franchise was transferred to the US. I had a difficult time with the US franchise version of this religion. It was suffocating.

Most of the youth in this church felt the same way.

what made it difficult?

• I wasn’t allowed to speak to the other female parishioners -not even in a friendly manner.

• there was no practical approaches to everyday matters outside of

“Pray About It” & “Read the Bible”

• I was verbally abused. One cultural aspect of being Indian was that we respected our elders and to a fault. Accepting their opinions, albeit in many cases, were not ill intended.

Praying was meditation and the Bible had many great learning lessons, but this and the whole experience had me yearning for more in my life.

#christianity #malayalee #india #kerala

It’s already a bit late, and I've been sitting on this for a while now. No idea why, but here it is. 🏆

Every New Year's resolution I had over the past years never worked out. So I stopped having them and thought about something manageable I could achieve. Which was also not working out because every time I try to work on a side project with a deadline, something occurs and moves my attention.

With this in mind, I started to make a wishlist for the new year. A list of things that were nice to achieve but not mandatory.

As a developer, for example, I want to release my newly created app, which I worked on in December (#AdventOfProgress). Then, use this app as a template and create a new app with a different topic, where I can reuse 75% of the code I already have. :) If this gets done this year, it would be nice to also have a small React Native app for #pelletyze. This could also be done in a small focused sprint because I only need the frontend; the backend is already working.

Fast forward; writing the above was in the past, and the pattern continued. I’ve created an entirely different app without finishing the first one. 😂 On which is now focus all my spare time. It is a little kids game. More of this in the next post.

Having a wishlist with maybe some milestones is a nice thing, I think. For example, having something done on my birthday. Or achieving X until summer and Y until autumn and so on. :)

Besides all the projects, there is still the private life, where I have to achieve things that are not fully in my control. Here, I stopped entirely having wishes. Here is the mantra: it’s done when it’s done. 😂😂

---

85 of #100DaysToOffload
#log
Thoughts?

Hello again. I hope you are well and will enjoy the football this weekend.

Six plaintiffs appealed to the Federal District Court to issue an injunction to stop ICE and other federal officers from violating their First and Fourth Amendment rights by stopping, arresting and beating protesters. These plaintiffs have submitted enough information to the court to convince the judge that they had a reasonable chance of winning their case.

The federal attorneys, in their response, provided the court with no believable information that would convince the court that the ICE officers acted appropriately in detaining, arresting and jailing protestors and could win the suit.

You can read the incredibly detailed and rational review of the two positions at https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2026/01/16/us/minn-injunction-aclu.html. While I rarely cite any sources here, I think it is important for you to see what is going on in Minnesota as claimed by both the protestors and their opponents. Please read the decision.

POTUS Roaster

Thank you for reading these posts. If you like what I write, please tell your family and friends. To read other posts in this series, go to write.as/potusroaster/archive

There is a strange and holy tension that runs through Revelation 19, a tension that many people feel but rarely articulate. We long for justice, yet we are afraid of what justice might look like if it finally arrives. We cry out for evil to end, yet we hesitate when Scripture shows us what the end of evil actually requires. Revelation 19 does not soothe those fears by softening the picture. It confronts them directly, and then it does something unexpected: it reveals that the One who brings final justice is not driven by rage, revenge, or loss of control, but by truth, faithfulness, and a righteousness that never corrupts itself.

This chapter does not begin with a battlefield. It begins with worship. Before a single sword is raised, before a single enemy falls, heaven erupts in praise. This order matters. Revelation 19 insists that judgment flows from worship, not the other way around. Justice is not God losing His temper. Justice is God remaining true to Himself.

The sound that opens the chapter is described as a great multitude, loud like rushing waters and mighty thunder, crying out “Alleluia.” That word has been domesticated in modern faith culture. We put it on coffee mugs and greeting cards. But here, it is not a gentle word. It is a word shouted after the fall of Babylon, after systems of exploitation, deception, and spiritual adultery finally collapse under their own weight. Heaven rejoices not because people are destroyed, but because lies no longer rule.

That distinction is crucial. Revelation 19 does not celebrate suffering. It celebrates truth winning.

Babylon, throughout Revelation, represents far more than a single city or empire. It is the accumulated weight of human systems that profit from injustice, seduce the vulnerable, and mock holiness while wearing religious language. Babylon is every economy that thrives on dehumanization. Every culture that rewards corruption. Every spiritual structure that promises life while quietly feeding on souls. When Babylon falls, heaven does not whisper. Heaven sings.

Yet even in that song, there is restraint. The praise is directed to God’s judgments because they are “true and righteous.” Not efficient. Not overwhelming. True and righteous. That phrase tells us something essential about God’s character. God does not win by becoming like what He opposes. He does not defeat deception by lying. He does not conquer violence by indulging in cruelty. His judgments are an extension of who He already is.

This is where Revelation 19 begins to reframe how we understand power.

On earth, power often reveals itself through dominance. The ability to crush opposition. The ability to silence critics. The ability to impose one’s will without consequence. Revelation 19 introduces a different kind of power, one that does not need to prove itself by spectacle. Before Christ ever appears riding the white horse, heaven has already declared who He is. He is faithful. He is true. He judges and makes war in righteousness.

Those words deserve to be lingered over. Faithful means He does not change allegiances. He does not abandon His promises. He does not betray His own nature to achieve results. True means He is reality itself, not merely accurate but dependable. When He speaks, the world aligns to His word rather than His word adjusting to the world.

This is why Revelation 19 unsettles people who prefer a gentle, non-confrontational Jesus. The problem is not that this Jesus is too harsh. The problem is that He refuses to be controlled.

When heaven opens and the Rider appears, He does not come as a negotiator. He comes as a King. Yet even here, the imagery subverts expectations. His robe is dipped in blood before the battle begins. This detail has puzzled readers for centuries. If the battle has not yet been fought, whose blood stains His garment?

The answer is uncomfortable and beautiful at the same time. The blood is His own.

Revelation does not introduce a new Jesus in chapter 19. It reveals the same Jesus in a different role. The Lamb who was slain is now the Rider who judges. The One who absorbed violence is the One who ends it. He does not arrive bloodless because He has already paid the cost of redemption. Judgment does not erase the cross. Judgment flows from it.

This is one of the most misunderstood aspects of Revelation. Many people imagine the final judgment as God abandoning mercy. In reality, it is mercy’s final boundary. Mercy extended endlessly without response becomes permission for abuse. Love that never confronts evil ceases to be love. Revelation 19 shows us a Jesus who has exhausted every invitation and now closes the door not out of bitterness, but out of faithfulness to truth.

The Rider’s eyes are described as a flame of fire. This is not a symbol of anger. It is a symbol of vision. Fire sees what darkness hides. Fire reveals what shadows conceal. There is no performance that survives that gaze. No reputation. No spiritual résumé. No carefully curated image. Revelation 19 reminds us that the final judgment is not based on how convincing we appear, but on who we actually are.

On His head are many crowns, a deliberate contrast to the beast earlier in Revelation who wore counterfeit authority. These crowns do not represent tyranny. They represent rightful ownership. Every domain that claimed independence from God is shown to have been borrowing authority it never possessed. The Rider does not steal power. He reclaims it.

Then comes one of the most striking details: He has a name written that no one knows but Himself. This single line dismantles our desire to reduce God into manageable categories. Even at the climax of history, even as He reveals Himself in glory, there remains an aspect of God that is not accessible, not explainable, not usable. He is not a tool for our causes. He is not a mascot for our movements. He is Lord.

This unknown name is not a flaw in revelation. It is a safeguard. It reminds us that no theology, no doctrine, no sermon ever exhausts God. We can know Him truly without knowing Him completely. Revelation 19 humbles every system that claims full ownership of God’s will.

When the armies of heaven follow Him, they are clothed in fine linen, white and clean. They carry no weapons. This detail is often overlooked. The power does not come from the army. It comes from the Rider. The saints do not fight the battle. They witness it. Victory is not achieved by human effort amplified by divine assistance. It is achieved by divine authority expressed in perfect alignment with truth.

The sword comes from His mouth.

Again, Revelation refuses to play by earthly rules. This is not a weapon forged by human hands. It is the Word. The same Word that created the universe now ends the rebellion against it. Lies collapse when confronted by unfiltered truth. Systems built on deception cannot survive reality forever. Revelation 19 does not portray Jesus swinging wildly in rage. It portrays Him speaking, and reality rearranging itself accordingly.

This is terrifying if you love illusion. It is liberating if you love truth.

The chapter moves inexorably toward confrontation, but the tone never shifts into chaos. Everything is measured. Everything is deliberate. The beast and the false prophet are captured, not chased. Their end is swift, not dramatic. Revelation 19 refuses to glorify evil even in its destruction. There is no long monologue. No heroic struggle. Evil is exposed, judged, and removed.

This is important for those who fear that God’s justice will mirror human cruelty. It does not. God does not savor punishment. He concludes it.

For believers, Revelation 19 is not meant to incite fear but to produce clarity. It asks uncomfortable questions. What systems do we benefit from that resemble Babylon more than the Kingdom? What compromises have we baptized as wisdom? What lies have we learned to live with because confronting them would cost too much?

Revelation 19 does not allow neutrality. It insists that history is moving somewhere, and that the end will not be negotiated by opinion polls or softened by sentimentality. Yet it also reassures us that the One guiding history is not unstable, not impulsive, not cruel. He is faithful and true.

Perhaps the most overlooked moment in the chapter is the marriage supper of the Lamb. Amid judgment, there is celebration. Amid the fall of corrupt systems, there is intimacy. God does not end history to stand alone. He ends history to dwell with His people fully, without distortion, without interference, without rival powers constantly poisoning the relationship.

The bride is clothed in fine linen, which is explained as the righteous acts of the saints. This is not self-righteousness. It is faith lived out. Obedience that mattered. Love that endured. Choices that aligned with truth even when it was costly. Revelation 19 affirms that our lives are not forgotten footnotes. They are woven into the final story.

The chapter closes not with uncertainty, but with finality. Evil does not escape. Truth does not retreat. Jesus does not abdicate. The Rider remains on the horse, history completed beneath Him, authority undisputed.

Revelation 19 does not invite us to speculate about timelines or obsess over symbols. It invites us to decide where we stand now. Not politically. Not culturally. Spiritually. Are we aligned with truth, or merely comfortable? Are we faithful, or merely familiar with faith language? Are we waiting for the Rider, or hoping He delays because His arrival would expose too much?

This chapter reminds us that Jesus is not returning as a spiritual concept or a moral example. He is returning as King. The same King who washed feet. The same King who bore wounds. The same King who forgave enemies. But also the King who will no longer allow lies to masquerade as life.

Revelation 19 is not the end of the story for believers. It is the end of the struggle between truth and deception. It is the moment when faith becomes sight, when hope becomes reality, and when love finally operates without resistance.

History does not end in fire because God is angry. It ends in truth because God is faithful.

And that is why heaven sings before the battle even begins.

The continuation of Revelation 19 presses us deeper into a reality most people instinctively avoid: the certainty that truth, once fully revealed, leaves no room for partial allegiance. This is not because God is intolerant, but because truth by its very nature refuses to coexist with lies indefinitely. Revelation 19 is not a threat dangling over humanity; it is a resolution. It is the end of ambiguity.

One of the most important shifts that happens in this chapter is the transfer of attention away from humanity’s response and onto God’s character. Much religious anxiety is rooted in the fear that judgment is arbitrary, emotional, or inconsistent. Revelation 19 dismantles that fear by anchoring every action in who Christ already is. He does not become judge because circumstances demand it. He judges because faithfulness requires it. He does not act to defend His ego. He acts to defend reality itself.

The title written on Him, “King of kings and Lord of lords,” is not merely a declaration of rank. It is a declaration of legitimacy. Every power structure that claimed final authority is revealed as provisional. Every throne that demanded ultimate loyalty is exposed as temporary. Revelation 19 does not deny that other powers existed. It denies that they were ever sovereign.

This matters deeply for those who feel crushed by forces larger than themselves. Political systems. Economic pressures. Cultural expectations. Religious institutions that drifted from truth. Revelation 19 does not tell believers to escape these systems prematurely, but it does promise that none of them get the last word. History does not belong to whoever controls the most resources. It belongs to the One who is faithful and true.

There is also a sobering message here for those who confuse moral passion with righteousness. The Rider does not share His authority. No one rides beside Him as an equal. This is not because God refuses partnership, but because final judgment cannot be crowdsourced. Human justice systems fail precisely because they are influenced by fear, favoritism, exhaustion, and self-interest. Revelation 19 insists that ultimate judgment must remain in hands that cannot be corrupted.

This does not make believers passive. It makes them faithful.

The saints follow the Rider not to fight, but to witness. That distinction reframes what it means to live faithfully now. We are not called to bring the Kingdom by force. We are called to live in alignment with it so clearly that when it arrives, we are already facing the right direction.

One of the most uncomfortable truths Revelation 19 reveals is that evil does not collapse gradually into goodness. It ends decisively. The beast and false prophet are not rehabilitated. They are removed. This is not cruelty. It is clarity. There are forms of deception that cannot be reformed because their entire existence depends on distortion. Revelation 19 does not portray God as unwilling to forgive; it portrays Him as unwilling to preserve systems that exist solely to destroy.

This confronts a modern tendency to believe that everything can be redeemed if given enough time. Scripture is more nuanced. People can repent. Systems built on lies cannot. Babylon does not need therapy. It needs to fall.

For believers reading Revelation 19 today, the question is not whether we agree with the imagery. The question is whether our lives reflect trust in a future where God’s justice actually arrives. Many people live as though injustice is permanent and evil inevitable. Revelation 19 declares that both are temporary.

That declaration carries responsibility. If we believe truth will ultimately prevail, then our present compromises become harder to justify. If we believe Christ will reign visibly, then living as though He is optional now becomes inconsistent. Revelation 19 does not pressure us to perform righteousness. It invites us to live coherently.

Perhaps the most profound comfort in this chapter is that the final victory does not depend on human endurance. Many believers are tired. Tired of resisting cultural pressure. Tired of explaining their faith. Tired of watching lies spread faster than truth. Revelation 19 does not scold that fatigue. It answers it. It says, in effect, you are not holding history together. You are being held by the One who is.

The Rider does not ask the saints to finish the work. He finishes it Himself.

This changes how we understand perseverance. We are not persevering to make God’s plan succeed. We are persevering because it already will. Faithfulness is not anxiety-driven effort. It is trust expressed over time.

Revelation 19 also exposes a subtle but dangerous temptation: the desire to see judgment fall on others while assuming exemption for ourselves. The chapter offers no such comfort. The same fire that reveals deception reveals everything. The same truth that dismantles Babylon examines the bride. The difference is not that believers are flawless. It is that they are clothed. Covered. Aligned with the Lamb who was slain.

This returns us again to the blood-stained robe. Judgment and mercy are not opposing forces here. They are inseparable. The One who judges does so as the One who died. This ensures that justice is never disconnected from love. The cross remains the lens through which judgment operates. God does not forget Calvary when He confronts rebellion. He remembers it.

Revelation 19 therefore invites a deeper kind of hope. Not optimism that things will improve gradually, but confidence that truth is undefeated even when temporarily obscured. Hope that does not depend on trends or outcomes or public approval. Hope anchored in a King whose authority does not fluctuate.

As the chapter concludes, Scripture does not linger on the aftermath. It does not describe celebrations in detail. It does not catalog rewards. It simply establishes that the opposition is gone. The noise that dominated history has ceased. What remains is order, presence, and peace grounded in truth.

That restraint is intentional. Revelation is not interested in spectacle for its own sake. It is interested in alignment. The final image is not chaos resolved, but authority settled.

For those who read Revelation 19 and feel fear, the invitation is not to turn away, but to look closer. Fear often comes from imagining judgment divorced from love. Revelation 19 refuses that separation. The Rider who ends deception is the same One who invited sinners to His table. The King who dismantles false power is the same One who refused to call down angels when mocked.

The question Revelation 19 leaves us with is simple, though not easy: do we trust that kind of King?

Not a king who flatters us. Not a king who validates every desire. But a King who tells the truth even when it costs Him, and who ends lies even when they are popular.

Revelation 19 assures us that such a King reigns, rides, and returns.

And because He is faithful and true, history does not end in confusion.

It ends in truth.

Watch Douglas Vandergraph’s inspiring faith-based videos on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@douglasvandergraph

Support the ministry by buying Douglas a coffee: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/douglasvandergraph

Your friend, Douglas Vandergraph

#Revelation19 #FaithAndTruth #ChristTheKing #BiblicalHope #EndOfDeception #KingOfKings

I am not an iOS developer, though I do a lot of dabbling with various languages, frameworks, etc. This week, I shipped my first app — PetPilot — to the App Store using Claude Code, and have two more that I'll hopefully share soon.

PetPilot is a free (no, like actually free: no in-app purchases, no ads) app to coordinate pet care in your household.

For the last two years my wife and I have been using an app to track care tasks for our golden retrievers, Pierogi and Pickle. The app we were using is “free”, but has ads and feels pretty dated/hasn't been well maintained. I decided to build my own version that optimizes for what we care about: low friction/one touch logging of things like feeding and potty breaks. (Instead of a screenshot of my app, I'm paying the cute dog tax on this post.)

I've never built an iOS app before and I barely know a lick of Swift, but this was a great experiment in using Claude to build something real. I originally started this project in July, but hit a major roadblock: a key feature is iCloud syncing/sharing so you can see each other's updates, but Opus 4.1 couldn't seem to get the cloud sync features to work after many attempts (and again, I am a very novice iOS dev.)

However, after Opus 4.5 came out I picked the project back up and in just a few hours everything was working great. It's almost a cliche at this point, but things are evolving quickly in the AI coding space.

If you're interested, you can download PetPilot here.

I hope if you decide to check it out that you find it useful.

There is something haunting about Revelation 18 that lingers long after you close the page. It is not the beasts or the judgments or even the fire. It is the silence. The chapter does not merely describe destruction; it describes the end of a sound. The end of music, commerce, celebration, routine, and confidence. It describes a world that assumed it was permanent suddenly discovering that it was fragile all along.

Revelation 18 is not written to scare believers into submission. It is written to wake them up. This chapter is not about curiosity concerning the end of the world; it is about clarity concerning the world we are already living in. It forces an uncomfortable question to the surface: what happens when everything people trusted collapses at once?

John is shown the fall of Babylon, but Babylon is not just a city. Babylon is a system. Babylon is an arrangement of values. Babylon is the belief that wealth can replace righteousness, that pleasure can replace purpose, that power can replace God. Babylon is what happens when human ambition organizes itself without humility and then convinces itself that it is untouchable.

The language of Revelation 18 is intentional and poetic. It is not rushed. It slows the reader down and makes them sit with the consequences. Babylon does not fall quietly. It falls publicly. Kings see it. Merchants weep over it. Shipmasters stand at a distance and mourn it. And heaven, shockingly, rejoices over it.

That contrast alone should make us pause. The same event produces grief on earth and joy in heaven. That tells us something vital: heaven and earth do not measure success the same way.

Babylon is described as wealthy beyond imagination. Gold, silver, precious stones, fine linen, purple, silk, scarlet, scented wood, ivory, bronze, iron, marble. The list is long and almost exhausting. It reads like an inventory report, because that is exactly the point. Babylon reduced human worth to market value. Everything was for sale, even souls.

That line should stop anyone in their tracks. “The souls of men.” Not just labor. Not just products. Souls. Identity. Dignity. Conscience. Everything had a price tag. This is not ancient history. This is not symbolic fluff. This is a mirror.

Revelation 18 is confronting a world where success is measured by acquisition, where influence is measured by visibility, where morality is flexible as long as profit is high. Babylon thrives in environments where people stop asking whether something is right and only ask whether it works.

The reason Babylon’s fall is so devastating is because it was trusted. Kings partnered with it. Merchants depended on it. People built their futures on it. And that is the danger. Babylon does not announce itself as evil. It presents itself as necessary. It becomes normal. It becomes the air people breathe.

That is why God’s command in the middle of this chapter is so striking: “Come out of her, my people.” Not run when she falls. Not hide when she burns. Come out before it happens.

This tells us something deeply personal. Revelation 18 is not just about judgment on systems; it is about separation of hearts. God is not only dismantling Babylon; He is rescuing people from being crushed beneath it.

The chapter makes clear that Babylon’s sins reached heaven. That phrase matters. It means corruption was not isolated. It was layered. Compounded. Normalized. What began as compromise grew into a culture. What began as convenience grew into captivity.

And when judgment comes, it comes “in one hour.” That phrase is repeated. One hour. Not gradually. Not slowly enough to adjust portfolios or rewrite narratives. One hour. This is the great shock of the chapter. Babylon did not see it coming because Babylon assumed continuity.

This is the lie every empire tells itself. We have always been here. We will always be here. Our systems are too big to fail. Our influence is too widespread to collapse. Our wealth is too diversified to vanish.

Revelation 18 says otherwise.

The merchants weep not because people are starving, but because no one buys their cargo anymore. That detail is intentional. Their grief is not humanitarian. It is financial. Their sorrow is not moral. It is economic. The system trained them to value profit over people, and when the system dies, so does their sense of meaning.

There is something chilling about how the chapter describes their mourning. They stand at a distance. They do not rush to help. They do not attempt to rebuild. They watch and lament what they have lost. Babylon taught them to observe pain, not alleviate it.

Then comes the silence. No more music. No more craftsmen. No more mills. No more lamps. No more weddings. The ordinary rhythms of life disappear. This is not just destruction; it is desolation. The very things that made life feel alive are gone.

Babylon promised fullness but delivered emptiness. It promised abundance but produced absence. It promised joy but ended in silence.

And then heaven speaks. Rejoice. Rejoice over her, thou heaven, and ye holy apostles and prophets. This is one of the most misunderstood moments in Revelation. Heaven is not celebrating suffering. Heaven is celebrating justice. Heaven is celebrating the end of exploitation. Heaven is celebrating the collapse of a system that devoured the vulnerable.

This is where Revelation 18 becomes deeply personal for believers today. We are not called to fear Babylon’s fall. We are called to examine our attachments to it.

What systems do we trust more than God? What identities are we building on things that cannot last? What comforts are we defending that quietly shape our conscience?

Babylon is not just “out there.” Babylon is any arrangement that rewards compromise and punishes faithfulness. Babylon is any culture that demands silence in exchange for security. Babylon is any system that thrives on distraction so people never stop to ask who they are becoming.

God’s call is not isolation from the world, but disentanglement from its idolatry. “Come out of her” does not mean physical withdrawal; it means spiritual clarity. It means refusing to let temporary power define eternal values.

Revelation 18 exposes the difference between wealth and worth. Wealth accumulates. Worth is given. Wealth can vanish in an hour. Worth is anchored in God.

Babylon believed it was a queen and would see no sorrow. That line reveals the heart of pride. Self-sufficiency always assumes immunity. It believes consequences are for others. It believes collapse happens elsewhere.

Scripture consistently warns against this posture, not because God is anti-success, but because pride blinds. Pride anesthetizes the conscience. Pride convinces people they are secure when they are actually standing on sand.

The chapter ends with a stone thrown into the sea, symbolizing finality. Babylon will not rise again. There is no reboot. No rebrand. No comeback story. This is not a temporary downturn; it is a permanent end.

That should sober us. Not because we fear loss, but because we must choose where we invest our lives.

Revelation 18 is not calling believers to panic. It is calling them to freedom. Freedom from systems that demand allegiance. Freedom from values that hollow out the soul. Freedom from identities that cannot survive eternity.

This chapter whispers a truth that becomes louder with every generation: what dazzles the world often disappears first. What seems unshakable is often already cracked. What feels permanent is usually temporary.

The question is not whether Babylon will fall. Scripture is clear. The question is whether we will still be standing when it does.

This is where we must go deeper, because Revelation 18 is not finished with us yet. It still has more to expose, more to challenge, and more to redeem.

The fall of Babylon is not the end of the story. It is the clearing of the ground.

And what God builds next stands forever.

Revelation 18 does not merely describe the collapse of Babylon as an external event; it presses inward, forcing a reckoning with how deeply Babylon embeds itself into human imagination. The chapter lingers not on fire alone, but on attachment. It shows us how people loved Babylon, relied on Babylon, defended Babylon, and defined themselves through Babylon. That is what makes the fall so catastrophic. When Babylon collapses, it is not just buildings that burn; identities unravel.

One of the most sobering elements of Revelation 18 is how normal everything felt right up until the moment it ended. People were buying, selling, trading, marrying, creating, singing. Life went on. Babylon did not collapse during chaos. It collapsed during routine. That detail matters because it reveals how deception works. Rarely does it announce itself with alarms. More often, it lulls people into thinking tomorrow will look just like today.

This is why Scripture consistently warns against loving the world. Not because creation is evil, but because systems built on pride train the heart to expect continuity where none is guaranteed. Babylon convinced people that stability was self-generated, that prosperity was self-sustaining, that influence was self-justifying. Revelation 18 tears that illusion apart.

The kings of the earth weep because their power was tied to Babylon’s prosperity. Their authority was not rooted in justice or truth; it was rooted in access. When the system collapsed, their significance collapsed with it. This is one of the great exposures of the chapter: power that depends on corrupt systems cannot survive their removal.

The merchants weep because their wealth had no redundancy. Their entire sense of success was transactional. When the market died, meaning died. That is why their grief sounds hollow. They mourn loss, not repentance. They mourn revenue, not wrongdoing.

And the shipmasters weep because they stood at a distance their entire lives. They benefited without proximity. They transported goods but never examined the cost. Babylon trained people to profit from harm without ever touching it. Revelation 18 removes that buffer. Distance no longer protects anyone from consequence.

Then comes the most chilling phrase in the chapter: “in her was found the blood of prophets, and of saints, and of all that were slain upon the earth.” Babylon was not neutral. It was violent. It silenced truth-tellers. It crushed dissent. It rewarded compliance. And it did so quietly enough that many never noticed.

This is where Revelation 18 becomes impossible to keep abstract. Every generation must ask where truth is being suppressed for convenience, where conscience is being traded for comfort, where silence is rewarded more than courage. Babylon thrives wherever truth becomes negotiable.

God’s judgment is described as righteous because Babylon was warned. Light was given. Truth was available. But Babylon chose indulgence over repentance. That is why the call to “come out of her” is mercy, not condemnation. It is God saying, you do not have to go down with this.

This call is not about geography. It is about allegiance. You can live within a system without belonging to it. You can function in the world without absorbing its values. That tension is the daily work of faith.

Revelation 18 confronts believers with a quiet but piercing question: if everything you rely on vanished overnight, what would still remain of you? Not your bank account. Not your reputation. Not your network. You.

And more importantly, your relationship with God.

Babylon collapses because it was built without reverence. It had no fear of God. It believed itself self-originating and self-sustaining. Scripture consistently shows that when societies remove God from the center, something else rushes in to take His place. Usually wealth. Usually power. Usually pleasure.

Those substitutes can function for a time, but they cannot hold weight forever. Revelation 18 is the moment when they buckle.

The silence described at the end of the chapter is not only physical. It is spiritual. When false gods fall, they leave no voice behind. They cannot comfort. They cannot restore. They cannot explain suffering. They simply disappear.

This is why heaven rejoices. Not because people suffer, but because lies end. Because oppression stops. Because the long manipulation of souls finally ceases. Heaven celebrates the truth being restored to its rightful place.

For believers, Revelation 18 is both a warning and a promise. The warning is clear: do not anchor your life to systems that cannot survive eternity. The promise is equally clear: God sees. God remembers. God judges rightly. And God rescues His people before destruction comes.

This chapter also prepares us emotionally for what follows in Revelation. The fall of Babylon makes room for the arrival of something better. God does not tear down without rebuilding. He does not remove false security without offering true refuge.

Revelation 18 clears the ground so Revelation 19 can introduce the marriage supper of the Lamb. Silence makes room for worship. Ashes make room for glory. Loss makes room for restoration.

That is the deeper hope woven into this chapter. Babylon falls, but God remains. Systems collapse, but the Kingdom stands. What was counterfeit fades so what is eternal can finally be seen.

If Revelation 18 unsettles you, it is doing its job. It is meant to loosen your grip on what cannot last and strengthen your hold on what will. It is meant to pull your gaze upward when the world insists you look around. It is meant to remind you that no matter how loud Babylon becomes, its music will eventually stop.

And when it does, only what was built on truth will still be standing.

That is not something to fear.

That is something to prepare for.

Watch Douglas Vandergraph’s inspiring faith-based videos on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@douglasvandergraph

Support the ministry by buying Douglas a coffee: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/douglasvandergraph

Your friend, Douglas Vandergraph

#Revelation #Faith #BibleStudy #ChristianReflection #EndTimes #SpiritualTruth #BiblicalWisdom #HopeInChrist #KingdomOfGod

Somewhere in a data centre, a pipeline is failing. Not with a dramatic explosion or a cascade of red alerts, but with the quiet malevolence of a null value slipping through validation checks, corrupting records, and propagating errors downstream before anyone notices. By the time engineers trace the problem back to its source, hours have passed, dashboards have gone dark, and business decisions have been made on fundamentally broken data.

This scenario plays out thousands of times daily across enterprises worldwide. According to Gartner research, poor data quality costs organisations an average of $12.9 million to $15 million annually, with 20 to 30 per cent of enterprise revenue lost due to data inefficiencies. The culprit behind many of these failures is deceptively simple: malformed JSON, unexpected null values, and schema drift that silently breaks the assumptions upon which entire systems depend.

Yet the tools and patterns to prevent these catastrophes exist. They have existed for years. The question is not whether organisations can protect their content ingestion pipelines from null and malformed JSON, but whether they will adopt the defensive programming patterns, open-source validation libraries, and observability practices that can reduce downstream incidents by orders of magnitude.

The economic stakes are staggering. Production defects cost enterprises $1.7 trillion globally each year, with individual critical bugs averaging $5.6 million in business impact. Schema drift incidents alone carry an estimated average cost of $35,000 per incident. For data-intensive organisations, these are not abstract figures but line items that directly impact profitability and competitive position.

The Anatomy of Pipeline Failure

Content ingestion pipelines are the circulatory system of modern data infrastructure. They consume data from APIs, message queues, file uploads, and third-party integrations, transforming and routing information to databases, analytics systems, and downstream applications. When they work, they are invisible. When they fail, the consequences ripple outward in ways that can take weeks to fully understand.

The fundamental challenge is that JSON, despite its ubiquity as a data interchange format, provides no guarantees about structure. A field that contained a string yesterday might contain null today. An array that once held objects might arrive empty. A required field might simply vanish when an upstream team refactors their API without updating downstream consumers. The lightweight flexibility that made JSON popular is precisely what makes it dangerous in production systems that depend on consistent structure.

Schema drift, as this phenomenon is known, occurs when changes to a data model in one system are not synchronised across connected systems. According to industry analysis, the average cost per schema drift incident is estimated at $35,000, with undetected drift sometimes requiring complete system remapping that costs millions. One analysis suggests schema drift silently breaks enterprise data architecture at a cost of up to $2.1 million annually in broken processes, failed initiatives, and compliance risk.

The problem compounds because JSON parsing failures often do not fail loudly. A missing field might be coerced to null, which then propagates through transformations, appearing as zeros in financial calculations or blank entries in customer records. By the time the corrupted data surfaces in a quarterly report or customer complaint, the original cause is buried under layers of subsequent processing.

The hidden operational costs accumulate gradually. Most data pipeline issues do not manifest as major failures. They build slowly through missed updates, manual report fixes, and dashboards that run behind schedule. Engineers stay busy keeping things stable rather than making improvements, and decisions that should be simple start taking longer than necessary.

Defensive Programming and Null Value Handling

The first line of defence against malformed JSON is a philosophy that treats every piece of incoming data as potentially hostile. Defensive programming assumes that any piece of functionality can only be used explicitly for its intended purpose and that every input might be a malicious attempt to break the system.

In practical terms, defensive programming means expecting the worst possible outcome with every user input. Rather than trusting that upstream systems will always send well-formed data, defensive pipelines validate everything at the point of ingestion. This approach is easier to implement than it might seem, because lifting overly strict validation rules is simpler than compensating for corrupted data by adding rules after the fact.

The MITRE organisation lists null pointer dereference as one of the most commonly exploited software weaknesses. When code attempts to access a property on a null value, the result ranges from silent corruption to complete system crashes. Errors such as buffer overflows, null pointer dereferences, and memory leaks can lead to catastrophic failures, making defensive programming essential for mitigating these risks through strict checks and balances.

Key strategies for handling null values defensively include validating all inputs before processing, avoiding returning null from methods when possible, returning empty collections or default objects rather than null, and using static analysis tools to detect potential null pointer issues before deployment. Static analysis tools such as Splint detect null pointer dereferences by analysing pointers at procedure interface boundaries, enabling teams to catch problems before code reaches production.

The trade-off of defensive programming is worth considering. While users no longer see the programme crash, neither does the test or quality assurance department. The programme might now silently fail despite programming errors in the caller. This is why defensive programming must be paired with observability: catching problems silently is only useful if those problems are logged and monitored effectively.

JSON Schema as a Validation Standard

JSON Schema has emerged as the primary standard for defining the structure and constraints of JSON documents. By specifying the expected data types, formats, and constraints that data should adhere to, schemas make it possible to catch errors early in the processing pipeline, ensuring that only valid data reaches downstream systems.

The current stable version, draft 2020-12, introduced significant improvements including redesigned array and tuple keywords, dynamic references, and better handling of unevaluated properties. The items and additionalItems keywords were replaced by prefixItems and items, providing cleaner semantics for array validation. The format vocabulary was divided into format-annotation and format-assertion, providing clearer semantics for format validation.

JSON Schema validation reportedly prevents 60 per cent of API integration failures and ensures data consistency across distributed systems. When schemas are enforced at ingestion boundaries, invalid data is rejected immediately rather than allowed to propagate. This fail-fast approach transforms debugging from an archaeological expedition through logs and databases into a simple matter of reading validation error messages.

The specification handles null values explicitly. When a schema specifies a type of null, it has only one acceptable value: null itself. Importantly, null in JSON is not equivalent to something being absent, a distinction that catches many developers off guard. To handle nullable fields, schemas define types as arrays that include both the expected type and null.

Community discussions emphasise that schema validation errors affect user experience profoundly, requiring clear and actionable error messages rather than technical implementation details. The goal is not merely to reject invalid data but to communicate why data was rejected in terms that enable rapid correction.

Validation Libraries for Production Systems

Implementing JSON Schema validation requires libraries that can parse schemas and apply them to incoming data. Several open-source options have emerged as industry standards, each with different strengths for different use cases.

Ajv (Another JSON Validator) has become the dominant choice in the JavaScript and Node.js ecosystem. According to benchmarks, Ajv is currently the fastest JSON schema validator available, running 50 per cent faster than the second-place option and 20 to 190 per cent faster in the jsck benchmark. The library generates code that turns JSON schemas into optimised validation functions, achieving performance that makes runtime validation practical even for high-throughput pipelines.

The library's production credentials are substantial. ESLint, the JavaScript linting tool used by millions of developers, relies on Ajv for validating its complex configuration files. The ESLint team has noted that Ajv has proven reliable over years of use, donating $100 monthly to support the project's continued development. Ajv has also been used in production to validate requests for a federated undiagnosed genetic disease programme that has led to new scientific discoveries.

Beyond raw speed, Ajv provides security guarantees that matter for production deployments. Version 7 was rebuilt with secure code generation as a primary objective, providing type-level guarantees against remote code execution even when processing untrusted schemas. The best performance is achieved when using compiled functions returned by the compile or getSchema methods, with applications compiling schemas only once and reusing compiled validation functions throughout their lifecycle.

For TypeScript applications, Zod has gained significant traction as a schema validation library that bridges compile-time type safety and runtime validation. TypeScript only exists during coding; the moment code compiles to JavaScript, type checks vanish, leaving applications vulnerable to external APIs, user inputs, and unexpected null values. Zod addresses this gap by allowing developers to declare a validator once while automatically inferring the corresponding TypeScript type.

The goal of Zod is to eliminate duplicative type declarations. Developers declare a validator once and Zod automatically infers the static TypeScript type, making it easy to compose simpler types into complex data structures. When validation fails, the parse method throws a ZodError instance with granular information about validation issues.

For binary serialisation in streaming data pipelines, Apache Avro and Protocol Buffers provide schema-based validation with additional benefits. Avro's handling of schema evolution is particularly sophisticated. The Avro parser can accept two different schemas, using resolution rules to translate data from the writer schema into the reader schema. This capability is extremely valuable in production systems because it allows different components to be updated independently without worrying about compatibility.

Protocol Buffers use .proto files where each field receives a unique numeric tag as its identifier. Fields can be added, deprecated, or removed, but never reused. This approach is particularly well-suited to microservices architectures where performance and interoperability are paramount.

Centralised Schema Management with Registries

As systems grow more complex, managing schemas across dozens of services becomes its own challenge. Schema registries provide centralised repositories for storing, versioning, and validating schemas, ensuring that producers and consumers agree on data formats before messages are exchanged.

Confluent Schema Registry has become the standard for Apache Kafka deployments. The registry provides a RESTful interface for storing and retrieving Avro, JSON Schema, and Protobuf schemas, maintaining a versioned history based on configurable subject name strategies. It enforces compatibility rules that prevent breaking changes and enables governance workflows where teams negotiate schema changes safely.

The architecture is designed for production resilience. Schema Registry uses Kafka itself as a commit log to store all registered schemas durably, maintaining in-memory indices for fast lookups. A single registry instance can handle approximately 10,000 unique schemas, covering most enterprise deployments. The registry has no disk-resident data; the only disk usage comes from storing log files.

For larger organisations, multi-datacenter deployments synchronise data across sites, protect against data loss, and reduce latency. Schema Registry is designed to work as a distributed service using single primary architecture, where at most one instance is the primary at any moment. Durability configurations should set min.insync.replicas on the schemas topic higher than one, ensuring schema registration is durable across multiple replicas.

Alternative options include AWS Glue Schema Registry for organisations invested in the AWS ecosystem and Karapace as an open-source alternative to Confluent's offering. Regardless of the specific tool, the pattern remains consistent: centralise schema management to prevent drift and enforce compatibility.

Contract Testing for Microservices Integration

While schema validation catches structural problems with individual messages, contract testing addresses a different challenge: ensuring that services can actually communicate with each other successfully. In microservices architectures where different teams manage different services, assumptions about API behaviour can diverge in subtle ways that schema validation alone cannot detect.

Pact has emerged as the leading open-source framework for consumer-driven contract testing. Unlike schemas or specifications that describe all possible states of a resource, a Pact contract is enforced by executing test cases that describe concrete request and response pairs. This approach is effectively contract by example, validating actual integration behaviour rather than theoretical structure.

The consumer-driven aspect of Pact places the consumers of services at the centre of the design process. Consumers define their expectations for provider APIs, and these expectations are captured as contracts that providers must satisfy. This inversion ensures that APIs actually meet the needs of their callers rather than making assumptions about how consumers will use them.

Contract testing bridges gaps among different testing methodologies. It is a technique for testing integration points by isolating each microservice and checking whether the HTTP requests and responses conform to a shared understanding documented in a contract. Pact enables identification of mismatches between consumer and provider early in the development process, reducing the likelihood of integration failures during later stages.

The Pact Broker provides infrastructure for sharing contracts and verification results across teams. By integrating with CI/CD pipelines, the broker enables automated detection of breaking changes before they reach production. Teams can rapidly increase test coverage across system integration points by reusing existing tests on both sides of an integration.

For Pact to work effectively, both consumer and provider teams must agree on adopting the contract testing approach. When one side does not commit to the process, the framework loses its value. While Pact excels at testing HTTP-based services, support for other protocols like gRPC or Kafka requires additional plugins.

The return on investment for contract testing can be substantial. Analysis suggests that implementing contract testing delivers positive returns, with cumulative savings exceeding cumulative investments by the end of the second year. A conservative estimate places complete recovery of initial investment within three to four years for a single team, with benefits amplifying as more teams adopt the practice.

Observability for Data Pipeline Health

Validation and contract testing provide preventive controls, but production systems also require visibility into what is actually happening. Observability enables teams to detect and diagnose problems that slip past preventive measures.

OpenTelemetry has become the primary open-source standard for collecting and processing telemetry data. The OpenTelemetry Collector acts as a neutral intermediary for collecting, processing, and forwarding traces, metrics, and logs to observability backends. This architecture simplifies observability setups by eliminating the need for multiple agents for different telemetry types, consolidating everything into a unified collection point.

For data pipelines specifically, observability must extend beyond traditional application monitoring. Data quality issues often manifest as subtle anomalies rather than outright failures. A pipeline might continue running successfully while producing incorrect results because an upstream schema change caused fields to be misinterpreted. Without observability into data characteristics, these problems remain invisible until their effects surface in business processes.

OpenTelemetry Weaver, introduced in 2025, addresses schema validation challenges by providing design-time validation that can run as part of CI/CD pipelines. The tool enables schema definition through semantic conventions, validation of telemetry against defined schemas, and type-safe code generation for client SDKs. By catching observability issues in CI/CD rather than production, Weaver shifts the detection of problems earlier in the development lifecycle.

The impact of observability on incident response is well-documented. According to research from New Relic, organisations with mature observability practices experience 34 per cent less downtime annually compared to those without. Those achieving full-stack observability are 18 per cent more likely to resolve high-business-impact outages in 30 minutes or less. Organisations with five or more observability capabilities deployed are 42 per cent more likely to achieve this rapid resolution.

Observability adoption materially improves mean time to recovery. In North America, 67 per cent of organisations reported 50 per cent or greater improvement in mean time to recovery after adopting observability practices. Integrating real-time monitoring tools with alerting systems can reduce incident response times by an average of 30 per cent.

For data engineering specifically, the statistics are sobering. Data teams reported an average of 67 incidents per month in 2023, up from 59 in 2022, signalling growing data-source sprawl and schema volatility. Mean time to resolve climbed to 15 hours, a 166 per cent year-over-year increase. Without observability tooling, 68 per cent of teams need four or more hours just to detect issues.

Shift-Left Testing for Early Defect Detection

The economics of defect detection are brutally clear: the earlier a problem is found, the cheaper it is to fix. This principle, known as shift-left testing, advocates for moving testing activities earlier in the development lifecycle rather than treating testing as a phase that occurs after development is complete.

Shift-left testing is a proactive approach that involves performing testing activities earlier in the software development lifecycle. Unlike traditional testing, the shift-left approach starts testing from the very beginning, during requirements gathering, design, or even planning stages. This helps identify defects, ambiguities, or performance bottlenecks early, when they are cheaper and easier to fix.

In data engineering, shift-left testing means moving data quality checks earlier in the pipeline. Instead of focusing monitoring efforts at the data warehouse stage, shift-left testing ensures that issues are detected as soon as data enters the pipeline. A shift-left approach catches problems like schema changes, data anomalies, and inconsistencies before they propagate, preventing costly fixes and bad business decisions.

Key data pipeline monitors include data diff tools that detect unexpected changes in output, schema change detection that alerts on structural modifications, metrics monitoring that tracks data quality indicators over time, and data tests that validate business rules and constraints. Real-time anomaly detection is absolutely critical. By setting up real-time alerts for issues like data freshness or schema changes, data teams can respond to problems as they arise.

Automated testing within CI/CD pipelines forms the foundation of shift-left practices. Running unit, integration, and smoke tests automatically on every commit catches problems before they merge into main branches. Having developers run one automated test locally before any commit catches roughly 40 per cent more issues upfront than traditional approaches.

The benefits of shift-left testing are measurable. A strategic approach can deliver 50 per cent faster releases and 40 per cent fewer production escapes, directly impacting revenue and reducing downtime costs. Enterprises that transition from manual to automated API testing approaches reduce their critical defect escape rate by an average of 85 per cent within the first 12 months.

Economic Returns from Schema-First Development

The business case for schema-first ingestion and automated contract validation extends beyond preventing incidents. By establishing clear contracts between systems, organisations reduce coordination costs, accelerate development, and enable teams to work independently without fear of breaking integrations.

The direct financial impact of data quality issues is substantial. Production defects cost enterprises $1.7 trillion globally each year, with individual critical bugs averaging $5.6 million in business impact. Nearly 60 per cent of organisations do not measure the annual financial cost of poor quality data. Failing to measure this impact results in reactive responses to data quality issues, missed business growth opportunities, increased risks, and lower return on investment.

Beyond direct costs, poor data quality undermines digital initiatives, weakens competitive standing, and erodes customer trust. The hidden costs accumulate through missed business growth opportunities, increased risks, and lower return on investment across data initiatives. In addition to immediate negative effects on revenue, the long-term effects of poor quality data increase the complexity of data ecosystems and lead to poor decision making.

The return on investment for implementing proper validation and testing can be dramatic. One financial institution achieved a 200 per cent return on investment within the first 12 months of implementing automated contract testing, preventing over 2,500 bugs from entering production while lowering testing cost and effort by 75 per cent and 85 per cent respectively. Another Fortune 500 organisation achieved a 10-fold increase in test case coverage with a 40 per cent increase in test execution speed.

Time and resources saved through implementing proper validation can be redirected toward innovation and development of new features. Contract testing facilitates clearer interactions between components, significantly reducing dependencies and potential blocking situations between teams. Teams who have implemented contract testing experience benefits such as the ability to test single integrations at a time, no need to create and manage dedicated test environments, and fast, reliable feedback on developer machines.

Building Layered Defence in Depth

Implementing effective protection against null and malformed JSON requires a layered approach that combines multiple techniques. No single tool or pattern provides complete protection; instead, organisations must build defence in depth.

At the ingestion boundary, JSON Schema validation should reject malformed data immediately. Schemas should be strict enough to catch problems but loose enough to accommodate legitimate variation. Defining nullable fields explicitly rather than allowing any field to be null prevents accidental acceptance of missing data. Validation errors should produce clear, actionable messages that enable rapid diagnosis and correction by upstream systems.

For inter-service communication, contract testing ensures that services agree on API behaviour beyond just data structure. Consumer-driven contracts place the focus on actual usage rather than theoretical capabilities. Integration with CI/CD pipelines catches breaking changes before deployment.

Schema registries provide governance for evolving data formats. Compatibility rules prevent breaking changes from being registered. Versioning enables gradual migration between schema versions. Centralised management prevents drift across distributed systems.

Observability provides visibility into production behaviour. OpenTelemetry provides vendor-neutral telemetry collection. Data quality metrics track validation failures, null rates, and schema violations. Alerting notifies teams when anomalies occur. Distributed tracing enables rapid root cause analysis.

Schema evolution in streaming data pipelines is not a nice-to-have but a non-negotiable requirement for production-grade real-time systems. By combining schema registries, compatible schema design, and resilient processing logic, teams can build pipelines that evolve alongside the business.

Organisational Culture and Data Ownership

Tools and patterns are necessary but not sufficient. Successful adoption of schema-first development requires cultural changes that treat data interfaces with the same rigour as application interfaces.

Treating data interfaces like APIs means formalising them with data contracts. Schema definitions using Avro, Protobuf, or JSON Schema validate incoming data at the point of ingestion. Automatic validation checks run within streaming pipelines or ingestion gateways. Breaking changes trigger build failures or alerts rather than silently propagating.

One of the most common causes of broken pipelines is schema drift, when upstream producers change the shape of data without warning, breaking downstream consumers. The fix is to treat data interfaces like APIs and formalise them with data contracts. A data contract defines the expected structure, types, and semantics of ingested data.

Teams must own the quality of data they produce, not just the functionality of their services. This ownership means understanding downstream consumers, communicating schema changes proactively, and treating breaking changes with the same gravity as breaking API changes.

Organisations conducting post-incident reviews see a 20 per cent reduction in repeat incidents. Those adopting blameless post-incident reviews see a 40 per cent reduction. Learning from failures and improving processes requires psychological safety that encourages disclosure of problems rather than concealment.

Implementing distributed tracing can lead to a 25 per cent decrease in troubleshooting time, particularly in complex architectures. Research indicates that 65 per cent of organisations find centralised logging improves incident recovery times. These capabilities require cultural investment beyond merely deploying tools.

Investing in Data Quality Infrastructure

The challenges of null and malformed JSON in content ingestion pipelines are not going away. As data volumes grow and systems become more interconnected, the potential for schema drift and data quality issues only increases. Data teams already report an average of 67 incidents per month, up from 59 the previous year.

The good news is that the tools and patterns for addressing these challenges have matured significantly. JSON Schema draft 2020-12 provides comprehensive vocabulary for structural validation. Ajv delivers validation performance that enables runtime checking even in high-throughput systems. Pact offers battle-tested contract testing for HTTP-based services. OpenTelemetry provides vendor-neutral observability. Schema registries enable centralised governance.

The organisations that thrive will be those that adopt these practices comprehensively rather than reactively. Schema-first development is not merely a technical practice but an organisational capability that reduces coordination costs, accelerates development, and prevents the cascade failures that turn minor data issues into major business problems.

The pipeline that fails silently today, corrupting data before anyone notices, represents an avoidable cost. The question is not whether organisations can afford to implement proper validation and observability. Given the documented costs of poor data quality, the question is whether they can afford not to.

---

References and Sources

1. Gartner. “Data Quality: Why It Matters and How to Achieve It.” Gartner Research. https://www.gartner.com/en/data-analytics/topics/data-quality

2. JSON Schema Organisation. “JSON Schema Validation: A Vocabulary for Structural Validation of JSON.” Draft 2020-12. https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/json-schema-validation

3. Ajv JSON Schema Validator. Official Documentation. https://ajv.js.org/

4. ESLint. “Supporting ESLint's Dependencies.” ESLint Blog, September 2020. https://eslint.org/blog/2020/09/supporting-eslint-dependencies/

5. GitHub. “json-schema-benchmark: Benchmarks for Node.js JSON-schema validators.” https://github.com/ebdrup/json-schema-benchmark

6. Pact Documentation. “Writing Consumer Tests.” https://docs.pact.io/consumer

7. OpenTelemetry. “Observability by Design: Unlocking Consistency with OpenTelemetry Weaver.” https://opentelemetry.io/blog/2025/otel-weaver/

8. Confluent. “Schema Registry for Confluent Platform.” Confluent Documentation. https://docs.confluent.io/platform/current/schema-registry/index.html

9. New Relic. “Service-Level Metric Benchmarks.” Observability Forecast 2023. https://newrelic.com/resources/report/observability-forecast/2023/state-of-observability/service-level-metrics

10. Zod. “TypeScript-first schema validation with static type inference.” https://zod.dev/

11. GitHub. “colinhacks/zod: TypeScript-first schema validation with static type inference.” https://github.com/colinhacks/zod

12. Integrate.io. “What is Schema-Drift Incident Count for ETL Data Pipelines.” https://www.integrate.io/blog/what-is-schema-drift-incident-count/

13. Syncari. “The $2.1M Schema Drift Problem.” https://syncari.com/blog/the-2-1m-schema-drift-problem-why-enterprise-leaders-cant-ignore-this-hidden-data-destroyer/

14. Contentful. “Defensive Design and Content Model Validation.” https://www.contentful.com/blog/defensive-design-and-content-model-validation/

15. DataHen. “Ensuring Data Quality with JSON Schema Validation in Data Processing Pipelines.” https://www.datahen.com/blog/ensuring-data-quality-with-json-schema-validation-in-data-processing-pipelines/

16. Shaped. “10 Best Practices in Data Ingestion: A Scalable Framework for Real-Time, Reliable Pipelines.” https://www.shaped.ai/blog/10-best-practices-in-data-ingestion

17. Sngular. “Understanding the ROI for Contract Testing.” https://www.sngular.com/insights/299/understanding-the-roi-for-contract-testing

18. Datafold. “Data Pipeline Monitoring: Implementing Proactive Data Quality Testing.” https://www.datafold.com/blog/what-is-data-pipeline-monitoring

19. Kleppmann, Martin. “Schema evolution in Avro, Protocol Buffers and Thrift.” December 2012. https://martin.kleppmann.com/2012/12/05/schema-evolution-in-avro-protocol-buffers-thrift.html

20. Datadog. “Best Practices for Shift-Left Testing.” https://www.datadoghq.com/blog/shift-left-testing-best-practices/

21. Datadog. “Use OpenTelemetry with Observability Pipelines.” https://www.datadoghq.com/blog/observability-pipelines-otel-cost-control/

22. Parasoft. “API ROI: Maximize the ROI of API Testing.” https://www.parasoft.com/blog/maximize-the-roi-of-automated-api-testing-solutions/

23. Pactflow. “What is Contract Testing & How is it Used?” https://pactflow.io/blog/what-is-contract-testing/

---

Tim Green UK-based Systems Theorist & Independent Technology Writer

Tim explores the intersections of artificial intelligence, decentralised cognition, and posthuman ethics. His work, published at smarterarticles.co.uk, challenges dominant narratives of technological progress while proposing interdisciplinary frameworks for collective intelligence and digital stewardship.

His writing has been featured on Ground News and shared by independent researchers across both academic and technological communities.

ORCID: 0009-0002-0156-9795 Email: tim@smarterarticles.co.uk

I’ve spent weeks disgusted with myself for allowing my iPhone 13 Mini to force an upgrade from iOS 18.6 to iOS 26. I can’t even look at you anymore, phone! Last July the e-ink Mudita Kompakt phone started officially supporting sideloaded APKs, so when my iPhone gets too slow to function I will start to look in that direction.

“The whole point is that the new U.I. has pointless animations,” I’d explained to my best friend, of iOS 26. That’s the idea, to eat battery and memory and other resources. I hate to abandon my iPhone Mini so soon after I’d finally had its lemon of a battery replaced, but this is technological coercion: an abusive relationship, with diminishing returns for the consumer.

Speaking as a person with diagnosed ME/CFS (“chronic fatigue”), I’m extra offended by iOS’s new “Liquid Glass” veneer. At a certain point you’re just like, “Listen, this is the amount of battery I have to work with. I am performant when I’m not trying to do it all with extra flourishes. This additional cognitive load is silly.” I’m irked because iMessage is animated now, with text bubbles blooping into existence. Cool. It looks great. You can't turn it off. What the fuck? This doesn’t justify a bigger, hotter lithium battery.

---

Digital Rights Management

I was recently explaining to a Gen Z’er that it has become, by design, more and more difficult to strip D.R.M. from a Kindle purchase. In the era of digital media, it had really started with Apple successfully locking music purchases to iPods and iTunes. I explained the antitrust lawsuit against Microsoft, and I’d gone into detail: Bill Gates was one of the first people to have a smarthome himself. He’d envisioned, for the rest of us, a type of always-on, always-connected computer—really, a home server—and there wouldn’t be any meaningful difference between locally-stored files and remotely-stored files.

“That’s kind of what we have now?” the Gen Z’er asked me. “The cloud.”

“Exactly,” I said. So that had been Gates’s big idea, hence the blurring of the distinction between the G.U.I. ‘Windows Explorer’ and the web browser ‘Internet Explorer’. But a court of law had determined this was a violation of consumers’ free will, and that the end-user ought to be able to use Netscape Navigator if so desired.

“When you eliminate true choice,” I warned the twentysomething, “you end up with billionaires.”

Some billionaires are apparently hellbent on making the Apple iPhone the last luxury good. I mean, it was already a luxury good, but at the same time people do need phones. I’m already over it.

I don’t have the spending money for an overpriced e-ink Android, though, so I’ve been trying to make it work with my iPhone 13 Mini. I used Nugget to mostly reflatten/unslick my U.I.; then I fussed with Blank Spaces until I’d achieved a look I can live with. (There’s a constant, perceptible border on widgets now, and you can no longer ‘hide’ the dock using wallpaper tricks, so my launcher is still messier-looking than I’d like.)

My best friend thinks my launcher screen is unexpectedly pretty, with its dual competing background wallpapers—I couldn’t get the one wallpaper perfectly lined up, so the widgets are now backed by an entirely different wallpaper—and I agree with her assessment.

The Gen Z’er, conversely, stared at my home screen in confusion, remarked that it is “depressing” (“Desolate?” I suggested, and she nodded fervently), and then said something about worrying about my mental health. I laughed and promised her that I do like color, just not on my phone.

I guess winter can be tough on everyone. Right now, outside, the fields are blanched with hoarfrost, so that they match the opaque white sky. It looks like a big blank slate, which seems to really get under people’s skin sometimes.

---

User Friction

I have been struggling to recover the feeling of 2005 for myself; blessedly, I’ve enlisted allies in my battle against my smartphone. For Christmas I received an inexpensive digital audio player, the FiiO Snowsky Echo Mini, which replaces my much older FiiO. I also received a Garmin for the car, plus a Kodak PixPro C1 (I happily gave away my CampSnap to a nearby child). As always, I’m still running around with my old Game Boy Micro in my purse, but for the past couple of years I’ve used an EverDrive cartridge with it. Last year I replaced the Micro’s battery, so it is good to go for maybe another decade or so. Rounding out everything are a few e-readers (I have a problem): I am so close to escaping iOS and never looking back.

Another thing I was gifted was a gen 2 Original Tamagotchi. Eventually I returned to the store and picked up a contemporary Tamagotchi Paradise. This thing is great. It’s the ultimate fidget; you could really get away from your smartphone using something like this. It’s crammed with mini-games, but a lot of them are time/progress-gated, “like Animal Crossing,” I explained to my best friend, “preventing you from playing everything all in one day.” This is the kind of friction we need.

The whole concept of “positive” technological friction is so interesting to me. U.X. designers have mostly eliminated it in favor of slick glossy surfaces because people hate to feel like their precious time is being wasted. But time is a slippery thing! If you don’t have gates and dams and a lot of texture and grit—if you don’t intentionally create friction—then time slips off, and you glance up from Candy Crush (or whatever infinitely-scrolling dopamine drip you prefer) and you stare at the clock like “huh?”

With that, it’s almost time for me to post an EDC selfie to the r/dumbphones subreddit. Admittedly, posting a picture of an iPhone there is just begging for a dogpile (“this place is getting to be as bad as r/veganism,” someone recently commented, of the subreddit’s purity tests), but I’m very proud of how small all my devices are, including my vape.

“But Jenn, that’s still so unwieldy. That’s so much stuff to carry in a bag. All those tools are already available on your full-featured smartphone.” Sure.

But I remember lugging all this stuff around in 2005: the stuff that mattered to me. It mattered, so it occupied space in a physical way. (This thought relates to Julio Torres’s idea that more ‘important’ apps should have icons that grow larger and larger with continued use, or his subsequent suggestion that, once a smartphone is laden with apps, it could become physically heavier—that each app might have corresponding weight and heft. This is whimsical, but this is also U.X. design.)

“You can’t do the job if you don’t have the right tools,” my landlord said to me in 2005, in a charming Croatian accent. He was proud of me for bringing him a toolbox—but no need, because he’d already brought his own tools. (He also once told me, very benevolently, “My compliments for having the correct-size television.” Not too big, not too small, appropriate for the room. He was impressed with the way I’d nested in his beloved building and, more specifically, with the fact that all the furnishings in my apartment were scaled appropriately. I loved him.)

When every tool or instrument is frictionlessly available on a phone, your priorities, the things you value, get flattened: everything ends up mattering the same amount, which is to say, nothing matters.

This very sense of ‘flattening’ was pretty directly evoked by the 2024 iPad “Crush!” commercial, which sent people through the roof because it’d so clearly illustrated the feeling of turning everything into a stupid app. At the time, some marketing dude named Michael Miraflor tweeted that the Apple commercial “[a]chieves the opposite of their legendary 1984 spot. It’s not even that it’s boring or banal. It makes me feel… bad? Bummed out?”

Here Miraflor was attempting to articulate an ineffable sense of desolation, a blanched cultural doomscape, an icy Tartarus. Feels bad, man.

---

Link Roundup

Last year I wrote about how much I liked the browser Arc; I ended up ragequitting over some poorly-implemented A.I. features, however, and shortly thereafter Arc’s own developers bailed on the project themselves. I ended up going back to Vivaldi, and eventually back to Brave. (I talked about using the Chrome extension The RSS Aggregator with Brave here.)

Much more recently, my friend Jason was screensharing his web browser over FaceTime. “Is that Arc? Are you using Arc as your browser?” I asked them. Nope, it was Zen! I was astonished and delighted. Now I am using Zen full-time on my Mac. I imported my feeds to the Firefox extension Sage-Like, a nimble feedreader that works well with Zen (unlike Feedbro).

Here are some links, most of which I collected before Christmas. Hopefully you can still enjoy them in 2026:

• Wikipedia – Corrupted Blood incident: Something I did not know about until today (thanks, TikTok) was an accidental, simulated pandemic in World of Warcraft in 2005, when—after a boss battle—players’ animal companions could remain ‘infected’ by a debuff. Introducing these still-infected pets in densely-populated cities could spread the debuff, even to nearby NPCs; ‘catching’ the contagion would kill a maxxed player-character within 30 seconds. “Epidemiologists [...] took interest in how MMORPGs, unlike mathematical models, could capture individual human responses to disease outbreaks rather than generating assumptions about behavior.”
• Pajiba – The Cruelty Is the Best Part of ‘Beast Games,’ Actually: Let’s talk about game theory!!
• The Guardian – The real Lord of the Flies: what happened when six boys were shipwrecked for 15 months: Here’s some happier news about human behavior. The Lord of the Flies is a book that messed me up as a teen; I have remained actively messed up by it, and I recently said so aloud. I lamented that, in times of crisis, if you try to impose any order, someone will sneak up and bonk you over the head. My best friend told me she had an article for me to read. Apparently, Rutger Bregman, the author of this book excerpt, was also disturbed by The Lord of the Flies. But instead of stalling out, as I had, he began to question William Golding’s nihilistic outlook. Bregman sought out and found the amazing true story of six Catholic school students who’d survived on a desert island for 15 months—and how they successfully, cooperatively accomplished it. “It’s time we told a different kind of story,” Bregman writes.
• Neal.fun – Size of Life via waxy.org links: A slideshow of living things, from smallest to biggest. “Each illustration was painted by hand and took five months to complete.” A handy “Compare to...” button lets you see scale illustrations side-by-side.
• WBUR Cognoscenti – Is the humble pigeon a mascot for our time?: I was thinking about this, too, just two nights ago as I drove under an overpass. It’s probably common knowledge by now that we domesticated pigeons for their utility and then abandoned them. “We became convinced they didn't belong,” writes Tove Danovich. But people everywhere are reevaluating the humble pigeon. File under “pizza rat.”
• Open Culture – “The Matilda Effect”: How Pioneering Women Scientists Have Been Written Out of Science History: Nice to know that the systematic discrediting and erasure of female scientists has a proper name, I guess? The fact that women’s contributions to humankind have to regularly be ‘excavated’ and ‘unearthed’ really drives home how and why a person can feel like a long-dead ghost of an ancient Babylonian well before they actually croak.
• Bloomberg – Meta Is Killing Off Its Only Good Virtual Reality App: I used to joke that the collective idea of V.R. was this dystopian nightmare vision of everyone braindead and drooling, either corpulent or withering away, jacked into the hypnomachine—and then it turned out that actually people enjoy dancing and punching and lunging their way to cardiovascular health. Even with a big clunky neck-breaking weight strapped to their heads!! Every platform dreams of having a killer app like Supernatural. Dumb, dumb, dumb. Leanne Pedante, I’d follow you to the ends of the Earth.
• BBC – Why do Gen Z have a growing appetite for retro tech?: The majority of people on the r/dumbphones subreddit are college students in their late teens or early twenties: that is, young people for whom it is imperative to recover focus. But also, young adults recognize things weren’t always like this, and their outright rejection of ‘the way things are’ is refreshing. It’s Liquid Glass all over again: we’ve lost control of our own devices, paralleling our very real lack of bodily and financial autonomy. Offline devices aren’t just about privacy or ‘opting out’; they’re about authoring your own destiny.
• The Baffler – The World’s Memory of the World: I’m embarrassed to admit I've never played the video game Disco Elysium, but that is slated to change. “It also eases your way into Elysium using a hoary old video game trick: amnesia. Gaming is full of amnesiac player characters,” writes Gabriel Winslow-Yost, “because they offer a tidy solution to the problem of controlling a person who knows things the player doesn’t. If by some plot device the character has forgotten all those things, they have a reason to ask for information about the setting or even about themselves, and the player has more narrative leeway to define their personality.” Elsewhere, on my own personal blog, I recently wrote about the social deduction game Spyfall. When you’re cast as the ‘spy,’ you’ve effectively been thrust into a story with no clearly defined role or setting—you're lacking a script that everyone else has been equipped with—which might function as a serviceable analogy for being neurodivergent. There in that blog entry, I’d compared this feeling to that of being “an amnesiac protagonist”: disoriented, disenfranchised. What if that isn’t a weakness at all, but a strength?
• Current Affairs – Why Fascists Always Come for the Socialists First: “This anti-egalitarianism can assume a conservative form where those on the right seek to uphold existing hierarchical authorities they regard as, by and large, legitimate. But it can also assume revolutionary and even utopian forms, where the radical right will fantasize about restoring or creating utopian kinds of society where the true ‘organic’ hierarchy will express itself.”
• McSweeney’s Internet Tendency – An Open Letter to the Soft Millennial Man Facing Extinction: Stay tender, tender boy. We need you now more than ever.

Finally, here is one more link that I only saw (thanks again, TikTok) after hitting ‘publish’ on this here newsletter/blog entry. I’ve updated the blog to include it:

• NYMag’s The Cut – In 2026, We Are Friction-Maxxing: This piece veers a bit into finger-wagging—I know, I know, I’m one to talk—but it also functions as a clarion call. Everything around us is designed to steal our attention. That isn’t any individual’s fault, but maybe it’s time to take more drastic measures against it. The author talks a lot about “building up tolerance for ‘inconvenience’” in this piece. There’s a book called The Comfort Crisis which focuses on this very topic; I’ve never read it, but maybe the author of the linked piece did. I do think the books Dopamine Nation and Soberish are both pretty good reading when it comes to forgiving yourself for having a normal brain, even as they’re both about finding strategies to outwit said brain.

---

A Word

This newsletter/blog entry has gone on longer than most of my other updates—because I spent over a month writing it—so I’d like to leave you, dear reader, with a word of unsolicited advice. Maybe think of it as Drew Carey, echoing his predecessor Bob Barker, concluding each episode of Price Is Right by begging his viewers to spay and neuter their pets.

Here is my word of advice: Please fully dry your laundry.

To make a long story short, I wasn’t able to put away an enormous load of clean laundry, so I left it festering at the foot of my bed. Over the next few days I noticed a number of skin eruptions on my face and neck, which I eventually identified as hives. Then I uncovered the pile of clothing and realized it smelled rank. It had never fully dried! According to the Internet, that foul mildew odor is a product of the VOCs from mold spores. I learned this only after frantically gulping down Benadryl because my periorbital sockets and lips had swelled up. Now my bags of laundry and bedding (six! six trash bags!) are in the garage, and I am doing them one at a time, and the window is open in the dead of winter, and I have to completely disinfect my bedroom. Please fully dry your laundry.

Blessings, Jenn

It was never about you— not in a universe of stars, not in the march of empires, not in the turning of ages— until God made it about you.

Until the infinite stepped into the finite. Until the Holy clothed Himself in flesh. Until the Father sent His only begotten Son—not to condemn the world, but to save it.

It wasn’t about you until Jesus fell to His knees in a garden, sweating blood beneath the weight of what love would cost. Until betrayal kissed His cheek. Until nails pierced His hands and feet. Until a crown of thorns pressed into the brow of mercy itself.

And even then— even while the hammer rang, even while the crowd mocked, even while the sky darkened— He made it about you.

From the cross He prayed, “Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do.”

Not anger. Not revenge. Forgiveness.

It wasn’t about you until God wrote the Everlasting Gospel— the greatest story ever told— and wrote your name into it with blood.

A story about saving you. About reaching you. About loving you all the way to death—and beyond it.

You were not worthy. You were not clean. You were not searching for Him.

And still— while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us.

That’s when it became about you.