Testing Day! :)

I've installed the app on a real device and tested everything. Most of the bugs I've found were keyboard related. If I had enabled the keyboard on the simulator, maybe there would have been fewer bugs. Or, should I call them bugs? When the keyboard is enabled, I just can see some inputs or buttons. I'm so happy that I did not find any critical bugs.

I've written all the bugs down and will fix them in the coming days. There were also some feature ideas I have written down. Possibly I will implement them as well in the coming days.

One feature I already implemented will be hidden behind a feature flag. Using the username as a login name is perhaps not the best idea, or maybe the implementation. Because on sign-up or username change, you can try multiple usernames and see which ones are already used. Which I think is a security risk. So this feature needs to be checked again on the drawing board.

👋

---

81 of #100DaysToOffload
#log #AdventOfProgress
Thoughts?

1. Dec 2, 2025: Performed a standard content refresh on 5 Leaders Who Actually Inspire Their Employees on Social Media. Updated examples, refreshed references, and aligned the piece with current executive social media norms.

2. Dec 3, 2025: Completed a standard refresh of Reed Hastings’ 5 Tips for Radically Disrupting an Industry. Modernized language, clarified strategic framing, and improved scan-ability.

3. Dec 3, 2025: Refreshed Five Business Leaders Crushing It Right Now on TikTok. Updated platform references, adjusted examples to reflect current creator norms, and improved SEO alignment.

4. Dec 5, 2025: Performed a standard refresh on Complete Guide to Social Media for CEOs. Updated platform guidance, tightened structure, and refreshed statistics.

5. Dec 5, 2025: Refreshed Five Strategies Daniel Ek Used to Grow Spotify into the World’s Largest Streaming Service. Clarified growth narrative, updated market context, and improved internal consistency.

6. Dec 6, 2025: Completed a standard refresh of Scott Hawthorn of Native Shoes on Bringing Personal Development into Business. Refined positioning, updated phrasing, and improved readability.

7. Dec 6, 2025: Performed a standard refresh on Leadership Exit Strategies. Clarified conceptual framing, improved structure, and aligned terminology with current leadership literature.

8. Dec 6, 2025: Refreshed Everything to Know About Twitter/X Ghostwriting. Updated for platform naming, posting norms, and executive usage patterns.

9. Dec 6, 2025: Completed a standard refresh of How Do You Ghostwrite for a CEO?. Updated workflow descriptions, modernized language, and clarified best practices.

10. Dec 6, 2025: Refreshed CEOs in Movies: Lessons for Everyday Leaders from Hollywood Blockbusters. Updated examples, improved transitions, and tightened narrative flow.

11. Dec 12, 2025: Performed a standard refresh on Enov8’s Your Essential Test Environment Management Checklist. Updated terminology, clarified checklist structure, and aligned with current testing practices.

12. Dec 19, 2025: Delivered a standard content refresh for Enov8’s Enterprise Release Management: Bridging Corporate Strategy and DevOps. Updated definitions, refined examples, and aligned the post with current enterprise release management practices.

Deux réussites et un échec.

• Le document de règles pour la Roue du Temps fait maintenant presque 40 pages, en incluant des pnjs communs (ce qui me manque pour le moment avec Zombiology) et l’équipement (oui, l’arc des deux-rivières est un peu cheaté, mais je me suis basé sur la version d20), et les méthodes du Ténébreux. Je m’étonne moi-même du résultat en si peu de temps : laisser tomber l’ambiance et se concentrer sur la technique a été efficace.
• La relecture du document pour Ecryme a bien avancé aujourd’hui.
• J’ai réfléchi à beaucoup de solutions pour illustrer ma visual novel “ils étaient dix” dans l’univers de Zombiology, malheureusement je ne vois pas comment faire pour que le jeu rende bien sans dépenser des milliers d’euros, que je ne mettrai pas dans un projet détente. J’hésite par conséquent à garder la forme d’un jeu vidéo, mais je me suis habitué à imaginer sa diffusion sous cette forme. Il suffirait qu’un artiste se prenne d’affect pour l’histoire et décide de l’illustrer pour que le projet éclose…

Les vacances m’ont permis d’avancer à bon rythme, malheureusement d’heure en heure les microbes de ma fille m’ont rattrapé. Joyeux noël microbien !

Day 1 out of 160

The first 8 months of 2025 were full of pain and loneliness.

I gained 7 kilograms, broke up with the man I wanted to marry, spent 3 months of my summer working on projects I couldn't care less about. I became complete enemies with my university flatmates, lost discipline, and went through internal darkness deeper than I thought was possible for me to experience. . . . . . The last 4 months of 2025 were full of progress and discovery.

I finally regained the long-forgotten skill of asking for help, inviting people to hang out, and just enjoying life without drowning the pain inside with academics.

A short romance, and then a longer one.

Travelling, gaining clarity, having experiences, feeling loved and appreciated. Learning guitar, starting personal training. . . . . . Primarily, I would like to document the journey back to myself. The things which are holding me back / I need to work through:

• Weight. By the 1st of June, I commit to going back to 60kg. Don't worry, given my height, this is a healthy weight, and one at which I was happy a few years ago. I remember how it feels to feel beautiful every second of existing, and I want that back.

• Academics. With all the stress, anxiety, feeling lost, etc., I forgot what it's like to spend hours every day truly using my brain, solving problems by myself, doing homework without the aid of AI. Satisfaction from academic stimulation is a feeling I aim to experience every other day.

• Personal projects. I would like to work more on programming projects, writing and guitar. I want more creative work and art in my life. This will be achieved at the cost of social media time, and amen to that.

• Mentorship. I don't really have older people to look to for guidance. I feel quite lost and alone the majority of the time. In the dark hours, I wish I had a supportive, wise grandparent who would stroke my hair and tell me some wise words to heal the wounds. I'm learning to reach out to older friends for at least part of this.

Where I'm at right now: I set up a study buddy. I have a PT, but am struggling with nutrition when outside of home (which I am 70% of the time). Hopefully will have access to another PT and nutritionist at the company I'm part-timing for right now. I have lots of ideas (including this blog!) and am trying to have a low bar for executing on them. I'm in a new relationship, which can either be my biggest obstacle or my biggest support. Let's hope for the latter.

Today is the 23rd of December, 2025. My life is good. But I know it can be much better. 2026 will be the year of progress, fulfilling work and beautiful life. I'm building the momentum now.

Join me.

Ephesians 1 is one of those chapters that quietly rearranges the furniture of a person’s faith if they let it. It doesn’t shout. It doesn’t argue. It simply states reality as if it has always been obvious, and the only reason it feels startling is because we’ve been living as though something else were true. This chapter does not begin with instructions, warnings, or moral corrections. It begins with identity. Not the identity we assemble, defend, or improve, but the identity that already existed before we ever took our first breath. That is what makes Ephesians 1 both comforting and unsettling. Comforting, because it removes the exhausting burden of self-construction. Unsettling, because it leaves no room for the illusion that we are self-made.

Most people approach God as though they are initiating something. They believe faith begins the moment they decide to take God seriously. They believe their story with God starts when they pray sincerely, repent earnestly, or finally get their life together enough to feel worthy of divine attention. Ephesians 1 quietly dismantles that entire framework. It insists that the story did not begin with your awareness of God. It began with God’s awareness of you. And not awareness in a passive sense, but intention. Choice. Purpose. Before you were conscious, before you were moral, before you were capable of belief or doubt, God had already made decisions about you.

Paul opens the letter by grounding everything in blessing, but not the kind of blessing most people chase. This is not situational blessing, circumstantial blessing, or emotional blessing. This is spiritual blessing, which operates independently of your current condition. Paul says we have been blessed with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly realms in Christ. Not some. Not future blessings contingent on performance. Every spiritual blessing. Already. That single sentence challenges the way most believers live. Many spend their lives pleading for what Scripture says has already been given. They pray from lack rather than from inheritance. They ask God to do what God has already declared done.

The reason this is difficult to accept is because spiritual blessings do not announce themselves through external evidence. They do not always translate into comfort, success, or visible progress. They exist at a deeper level, one that shapes reality rather than reacting to it. Ephesians 1 insists that what is most true about you cannot be measured by your circumstances. It is located in God’s eternal intention, not your present experience. This is why so many sincere believers feel perpetually behind, anxious, or uncertain. They are trying to earn what was never meant to be earned.

Paul then moves immediately to the language that makes people uncomfortable: chosen, predestined, adopted. These words have been debated, dissected, defended, and feared for centuries. But Paul does not introduce them as abstract theological concepts. He introduces them as personal assurances. He says we were chosen in Christ before the foundation of the world, not because of anything we would later do, but so that we would be holy and blameless in love. The goal of choosing was not exclusion or elitism. It was transformation rooted in love.

The problem is that many people read “chosen” through the lens of human power dynamics. In human systems, being chosen usually means someone else was rejected. In human systems, choice is often arbitrary, competitive, or unjust. But Paul is not describing a human election. He is describing divine intention. God’s choosing is not reactive. It is creative. It does not respond to human worth; it creates it. You are not chosen because you were impressive. You are impressive because you were chosen.

When Paul says we were predestined for adoption, he is not describing a cold decree written in a cosmic ledger. He is describing relational commitment. Adoption in the ancient world was not sentimental; it was legal, intentional, and irreversible. To adopt someone was to give them your name, your inheritance, and your future. Paul is saying God did not merely tolerate humanity or make room for it. God decided, ahead of time, to bring people into His family with full status, not probationary membership.

This matters because so many believers live like spiritual orphans. They believe God loves them in theory but keeps them at arm’s length in practice. They believe grace covers their past but does not fully secure their future. They believe acceptance is fragile and belonging must be continually proven. Ephesians 1 says none of that is true. Adoption does not depend on performance after the fact. It depends on the will of the one who adopts. Paul explicitly says this was done according to God’s pleasure and will, not ours.

There is a quiet freedom in realizing that God’s pleasure came before your obedience. Not after it. Not because of it. Before it. That means obedience is no longer a desperate attempt to secure love; it becomes a response to love already secured. Many people burn out spiritually because they are trying to maintain a relationship that was never meant to be maintained by effort. Ephesians 1 reframes the entire relationship. God is not waiting to see if you qualify. God already decided to include you.

Paul then ties all of this to grace, not as a vague concept but as a concrete action. He says God freely bestowed grace on us in the Beloved. Grace is not merely forgiveness after failure. Grace is God’s proactive generosity. It is God deciding to give before being asked. Grace is not God lowering standards; it is God absorbing the cost. This grace is not thin or reluctant. Paul says it was lavished on us. Poured out without restraint. Given in abundance.

The idea of lavish grace challenges the scarcity mindset that dominates so much of religious life. Many people believe God gives grace cautiously, worried that too much will make people careless. But Paul says the opposite. God gives grace generously because grace is not fragile. It is powerful. It does not weaken holiness; it produces it. It does not excuse sin; it heals what sin breaks. The problem is not too much grace. The problem is too little understanding of what grace actually does.

Paul then introduces redemption, not as an abstract spiritual term but as a lived reality. He says we have redemption through Christ’s blood, the forgiveness of sins. Redemption means release at a cost. It means freedom purchased, not earned. Forgiveness here is not God deciding to overlook wrongdoing. It is God dealing with it fully. The blood language reminds the reader that reconciliation was not cheap. It was costly. But the cost was paid by God, not demanded from humanity.

This is where many people get stuck. They believe in forgiveness but continue to live as though debt remains. They believe Christ died for sin but still carry shame as if payment is pending. Ephesians 1 insists that forgiveness is not partial. It is complete. If forgiveness is real, then condemnation has no legal standing. If redemption is true, then bondage no longer defines reality. The issue is not whether God has forgiven. The issue is whether we are willing to live as forgiven people.

Paul then says something remarkable. He says God made known to us the mystery of His will. A mystery is not something unknowable; it is something once hidden and now revealed. God’s will is not locked behind esoteric knowledge or spiritual elitism. It has been disclosed. Revealed. Made accessible. And the mystery is this: God intends to bring everything together in Christ, things in heaven and things on earth.

This statement quietly reorients the entire universe. It means history is not random. It means suffering is not meaningless. It means fragmentation is temporary. God’s purpose is integration. Restoration. Reconciliation. The world feels fractured because it is fractured, but Ephesians 1 insists that fragmentation is not the final word. Christ is not merely a personal savior; Christ is the focal point of cosmic restoration.

This matters because many people reduce faith to private spirituality. They believe Christianity is primarily about personal morality or internal peace. Ephesians 1 refuses to shrink the scope. God’s plan is not just to fix individuals. It is to heal creation. To reunite what has been torn apart. To bring coherence where there has been chaos. When you place your faith in Christ, you are not opting out of the world. You are aligning yourself with God’s plan to restore it.

Paul then brings this cosmic vision back to the personal level. He says that in Christ we have obtained an inheritance, having been predestined according to the purpose of the One who works all things according to the counsel of His will. That sentence carries weight. It says God is not improvising. God is not reacting. God is not surprised by history. God is working all things, not some things, toward His purpose.

This does not mean everything that happens is good. It means God is capable of bringing good out of what happens. It means no pain is wasted. No failure is final. No detour is beyond redemption. Many people hear “God’s will” and imagine rigidity or control. Paul presents it as assurance. God’s purpose is steady even when life is not. God’s intention is not fragile, and it does not depend on human consistency.

Paul says we were included in Christ when we heard the message of truth and believed. Inclusion comes through trust, not perfection. Faith here is not intellectual certainty. It is relational reliance. It is saying yes to what God has already done. Belief does not create inclusion; it receives it. And when we believe, Paul says we are sealed with the promised Holy Spirit.

A seal in the ancient world was a mark of ownership, authenticity, and security. It meant something belonged to someone and was protected by their authority. Paul is saying the Spirit is not just a comforting presence. The Spirit is a guarantee. A down payment. Evidence that what God has started will be finished. The Spirit does not enter temporarily, waiting to see how you perform. The Spirit marks you as belonging to God.

This has enormous implications for how people understand spiritual growth. Growth is not about earning God’s continued presence. It is about learning to live in alignment with a presence that is already there. The Spirit is not a reward for maturity; the Spirit is the source of it. Many people wait to feel worthy before trusting God fully. Ephesians 1 says God trusted you with His Spirit before you ever felt worthy.

Paul ends the chapter by explaining how he prays for believers. He does not pray that their circumstances improve. He does not pray that they become more impressive. He prays that they receive wisdom and revelation so they may know God better. He prays that the eyes of their hearts may be enlightened so they can understand the hope of their calling, the riches of their inheritance, and the greatness of God’s power toward those who believe.

This prayer reveals the real problem most believers face. It is not a lack of resources. It is a lack of perception. They do not need more from God; they need to see what they already have. They live beneath their inheritance because they are unaware of it. Paul is asking God to open their inner eyes so reality becomes visible.

He then describes God’s power, not in abstract terms but through resurrection. The same power that raised Christ from the dead is at work in believers. That is not metaphorical. It is not poetic exaggeration. It is a statement of spiritual reality. Resurrection power is not only for the afterlife. It is active now. It is the power that brings life where death has dominated. Hope where despair has settled. Renewal where exhaustion has taken root.

Paul says Christ is seated far above every authority and power, not only in this age but the age to come. That means no system, no ideology, no force ultimately outranks Christ. The chaos of the world is real, but it is not sovereign. Christ is. And God has placed all things under Christ’s feet and appointed Him as head over everything for the church.

This final phrase is easy to miss, but it is stunning. Christ’s authority is exercised for the sake of the church. That does not mean the church controls Christ. It means Christ’s rule benefits those who belong to Him. The church is not an afterthought. It is central to God’s plan. And the church, Paul says, is Christ’s body, the fullness of Him who fills everything in every way.

That sentence deserves more attention than it usually receives. The church is described as the fullness of Christ. Not because the church replaces Christ, but because Christ chooses to express Himself through people. Imperfect people. Fragile people. Ordinary people. God’s plan is not to bypass humanity but to work through it. That means your life matters in ways you may not yet understand.

Ephesians 1 does not ask you to do anything. It asks you to see something. To realize that before you were aware of God, God was already aware of you. Before you were seeking, you were chosen. Before you were obedient, you were adopted. Before you were forgiven, redemption was secured. Before you were strong, power was at work. The chapter does not end with pressure. It ends with assurance.

And assurance changes everything.

What Ephesians 1 ultimately confronts is not bad behavior, weak discipline, or shallow devotion. It confronts misunderstanding. Most spiritual instability is not caused by rebellion but by misalignment. People are trying to live from a place God never asked them to live from. They are striving to become what God already declared them to be. Ephesians 1 gently but firmly pulls the foundation out from under that entire way of thinking.

When Paul speaks about the eyes of the heart being enlightened, he is acknowledging something uncomfortable but true: people can be sincere and still spiritually blind. Not blind to God’s existence, but blind to their position. Blind to what has already been established. Blind to the scale of what God has done. You can believe in Christ and still live as though the verdict is undecided. You can love God and still function as though acceptance is temporary. Paul’s prayer is not for stronger willpower but for clearer vision.

The heart, in biblical language, is the center of perception, not just emotion. It is how a person interprets reality. When the heart’s eyes are dim, everything becomes distorted. Grace feels fragile. Identity feels unstable. God feels distant. But when the heart is enlightened, the same circumstances take on a different meaning. Struggle does not disappear, but it no longer defines you. Failure still hurts, but it no longer condemns you. Waiting still stretches you, but it no longer feels like abandonment.

Paul specifically prays that believers would understand three things: the hope of their calling, the riches of their inheritance, and the greatness of God’s power toward them. Those three areas correspond directly to the three places where most believers struggle the most: the future, their worth, and their ability to endure.

Hope of calling addresses the future. Many people fear the future not because they lack faith, but because they lack clarity. They worry they will miss God’s will, fall behind, or fail permanently. Ephesians 1 reframes calling as something rooted in God’s initiative, not human precision. Your calling is not a fragile path you must perfectly navigate. It is a purpose anchored in God’s intention. You do not have to guess whether God intends to work through your life. That question was settled before you were born.

The riches of inheritance address worth. Paul does not say a modest inheritance, or a conditional inheritance. He says riches. Wealth. Abundance. This inheritance is not measured in material terms, but in belonging, access, and identity. It means you are not a tolerated outsider. You are not a spiritual renter. You are an heir. Many people treat God’s love like a loan they must keep qualifying for. Paul insists it is an inheritance, secured by relationship, not performance.

The greatness of God’s power addresses endurance. People often underestimate what drains them. Life wears people down. Disappointment accumulates. Prayers seem unanswered. Energy fades. Faith becomes quieter, not because it is gone, but because it is tired. Paul does not respond by telling people to try harder. He points them to resurrection power. The same power that raised Christ is not reserved for dramatic miracles; it is available for daily faithfulness.

Resurrection power is not only about life after death. It is about life after loss. Life after failure. Life after disappointment. It is the power that brings movement where things feel stuck. Perspective where things feel confusing. Strength where things feel depleted. Many people believe resurrection power is something they must access through spiritual intensity. Ephesians 1 presents it as something already at work.

This is why Paul emphasizes Christ’s position above every authority and power. He is not trying to impress readers with cosmic hierarchy. He is anchoring their confidence. Whatever feels dominant in your life is not ultimate. Fear is not ultimate. Shame is not ultimate. Systems, trends, cultures, and forces that feel overwhelming are not ultimate. Christ is. And Christ’s authority is not distant. It is exercised on behalf of those who belong to Him.

When Paul says Christ is head over everything for the church, he is saying that Christ’s rule is not abstract. It is relational. The authority that governs the universe is invested in the well-being of Christ’s body. That does not mean believers are immune from hardship. It means hardship does not have the final say. The story is still moving, and Christ is still directing it.

The idea that the church is the fullness of Christ challenges both arrogance and insecurity. It dismantles arrogance by reminding believers they are not the source of power. Christ is. But it dismantles insecurity by reminding them they are not irrelevant. Christ chooses to express Himself through people. Through community. Through imperfect, developing, sometimes struggling believers.

This means your faith matters even when it feels small. Your obedience matters even when it feels unnoticed. Your presence matters even when it feels ordinary. You are not filling time while God does the real work somewhere else. You are part of how God is at work in the world. That does not place pressure on you to be extraordinary. It places meaning on your faithfulness.

Ephesians 1 does not invite you to manufacture confidence. It invites you to rest in clarity. Confidence grows naturally when you understand what is already true. When you know you are chosen, you stop auditioning. When you know you are adopted, you stop hiding. When you know you are redeemed, you stop rehearsing shame. When you know you are sealed, you stop living as though everything is temporary.

This chapter quietly shifts the center of gravity in a person’s faith. God is no longer someone you chase anxiously. God becomes the One who has already acted decisively. Faith becomes less about proving sincerity and more about trusting reality. Obedience becomes less about fear and more about alignment. Growth becomes less about pressure and more about response.

Ephesians 1 teaches you how to locate yourself correctly in the story. You are not at the beginning, hoping God will engage. You are in the middle of a plan that began long before you and will continue long after you. Your role is not to secure God’s favor. Your role is to live in light of it.

That realization does not make faith passive. It makes it grounded. It gives you a place to stand when emotions fluctuate. It gives you language when doubts surface. It gives you stability when circumstances shift. You may not always feel chosen, but you are. You may not always feel powerful, but resurrection power is at work. You may not always feel close to God, but you are sealed by His Spirit.

Before you were ever aware of God, God was already aware of you. Before you were capable of belief, God had already decided to bless. Before you ever asked for forgiveness, redemption was already paid for. Before you ever felt strong enough, power was already moving.

Ephesians 1 does not end with commands because identity comes before instruction. Once you see who you are, the rest of the letter makes sense. Everything Paul will later ask believers to do flows out of what he has already declared to be true. This chapter is the foundation. And foundations are not built to impress; they are built to hold.

If you let it, Ephesians 1 will hold you steady.

Not because life gets easier.

But because you finally understand where you stand.

Watch Douglas Vandergraph’s inspiring faith-based videos on YouTube

Support the ministry by buying Douglas a coffee

Your friend, Douglas Vandergraph

#Ephesians #BibleStudy #ChristianFaith #Grace #IdentityInChrist #Chosen #Redemption #Hope #Scripture #FaithJourney

Slept through most of the day. Apparently that’s what people do when reality feels optional.

Woke up just enough to read manga horror, of course. The Human Chair. A man hiding inside furniture, watching people live inches away from him. Which, honestly, is a solid concept. Quiet. Patient. Disgusting in a very polite way.

I liked it. Not because it’s scary but because it understands something. That you don’t have to be loud to be disturbing. You just have to stay long enough.

Nothing else happened today. And somehow, the chair felt more present than most people I know.

If tomorrow asks what I did, I’ll say “rested.” That’s technically true.

Sincerely, Ahmed

The Cost of Transactional Power: Short-Term “Wins,” Long-Term Weakness

There is a particular comfort that comes with immediate results.

Gas prices dip.

Markets steady.

A deal is announced.

The headlines suggest progress.

Relief follows—and relief matters. No serious observer denies that short-term outcomes have real effects on real people. Stability is not an illusion. Negotiation is not weakness. Results are not irrelevant.

But relief is not the same thing as strength.

Strength is what remains after the moment passes—when attention moves on and the terms of the exchange are tested by time. And it is here, after the optics fade, that the deeper costs of how power is exercised begin to surface.

The Difference Between Trade and Surrender

Not every exchange is equal.

A trade preserves leverage.

A surrender depletes it.

Some assets are renewable. Others are not.

Soybeans can be replanted.

Credibility cannot.

Energy shipments can be rerouted.

Trust cannot.

Markets fluctuate and recover.

Precedent accumulates.

The danger is not negotiation itself, but negotiation that treats long-term sources of power as disposable—bargaining chips rather than foundations. When exchanges are made without regard for reversibility, what looks like pragmatism in the moment quietly becomes concession.

This distinction matters because power does not operate in isolation. It is observed, interpreted, and remembered.

A Concrete Example: When Leverage Moves Sideways

Consider a recent, largely unexamined exchange.

The United States committed roughly $40 billion in taxpayer-backed support to stabilize Argentina’s economy—an action framed as necessary for regional stability and global market confidence.

Shortly thereafter, Argentina eased restrictions on soybean exports to China.

The result was predictable.

Chinese purchases shifted.

American soybean farmers lost revenue.

U.S. agricultural producers—already bearing the cost of trade friction—received approximately $12 billion in bailout assistance to offset losses tied to reduced Chinese demand.

The numbers matter, but the sequence matters more.

American public funds stabilized a foreign economy.

That economy then adjusted its trade posture to favor a strategic competitor.

American producers absorbed the loss, partially offset by domestic relief.

This was not an illegal exchange.

It was not a conspiracy.

It was transactional power operating exactly as designed.

And it reveals the problem.

The United States absorbed long-term leverage loss in exchange for short-term stabilization optics—while competitors benefited indirectly, and domestic producers bore the downstream cost.

Some assets were treated as renewable.

Others were not treated as assets at all.

Transactional Power vs. Durable Power

There are two ways power tends to function.

Transactional power is immediate, personalized, and optics-driven. It rewards speed. It values visibility. It produces outcomes that can be announced quickly—and revised just as quickly.

Durable power is slower and less dramatic. It is institutional rather than personal. It depends on predictability, consistency, and credibility over time. Its benefits rarely make headlines, but they compound.

The problem arises when transactional power begins to displace durable power—when visibility is mistaken for leverage, and decisiveness for strength.

When power is personalized, alliances become provisional.

When rules appear flexible, patience becomes a strategy.

When restraint is treated as optional, others learn to wait.

What Others Actually Hear

Power never speaks only to its own people.

What matters is not just what is said, but what is heard.

When deals are framed as wins regardless of cost, the message received is not efficiency—it is volatility. When long-standing norms are treated as negotiable, the signal sent is not realism—it is impermanence.

Adversaries do not need to be named aggressively to be listening. Allies do not need to be insulted to feel uncertainty. Precedent travels faster than policy, and interpretation outlasts intention.

A nation that treats its leverage as transactional teaches others to do the same.

The Illusion of Strength

There is a temptation to equate strength with dominance, volume, or the ability to extract immediate concessions. But strength is not proven by how much can be taken—it is proven by how much does not need to be taken.

True strength is restraint that does not require constant performance.

It is credibility that survives leadership changes.

It is influence that does not depend on spectacle.

Power that must announce itself repeatedly is already being tested.

The Question That Matters

This moment does not require outrage or allegiance.

It requires clarity.

The question is not whether a deal was made.

The question is what it cost us to make it.

What we give away quietly determines what we lose later.

And what endures—trust, legitimacy, credibility—cannot be regained on demand.

Strength is not what satisfies the moment.

Strength is what remains when the moment passes.

© SilentSentinel, 2025. All rights reserved.

---

El costo del poder transaccional: “victorias” a corto plazo, debilidad a largo plazo

Existe un consuelo particular en los resultados inmediatos.

Bajan los precios del gas. Los mercados se estabilizan. Se anuncia un acuerdo. Los titulares sugieren progreso.

Llega el alivio —y el alivio importa. Ningún observador serio niega que los resultados a corto plazo tengan efectos reales sobre personas reales. La estabilidad no es una ilusión. Negociar no es debilidad. Los resultados no son irrelevantes.

Pero el alivio no es lo mismo que la fortaleza.

La fortaleza es lo que permanece cuando el momento pasa —cuando la atención se desplaza y los términos del intercambio son puestos a prueba por el tiempo. Y es ahí, cuando se desvanece la óptica, donde comienzan a aflorar los costos más profundos de cómo se ejerce el poder.

La diferencia entre intercambio y rendición

No todo intercambio es igual.

Un intercambio preserva el apalancamiento. Una rendición lo agota.

Algunos activos son renovables. Otros no lo son.

La soya puede volver a sembrarse. La credibilidad no.

Los envíos de energía pueden redirigirse. La confianza no.

Los mercados fluctúan y se recuperan. El precedente se acumula.

El peligro no es la negociación en sí, sino la negociación que trata las fuentes de poder a largo plazo como desechables —fichas de cambio en lugar de cimientos. Cuando los intercambios se realizan sin considerar su reversibilidad, lo que parece pragmatismo en el momento se convierte silenciosamente en concesión.

Esta distinción importa porque el poder no opera en aislamiento. Es observado, interpretado y recordado.

Un ejemplo concreto: cuando el apalancamiento se desplaza de lado

Consideremos un intercambio reciente, en gran medida poco examinado.

Estados Unidos comprometió aproximadamente 40 mil millones de dólares en respaldo con fondos de los contribuyentes para estabilizar la economía de Argentina —una acción presentada como necesaria para la estabilidad regional y la confianza de los mercados globales.

Poco después, Argentina relajó las restricciones a las exportaciones de soya hacia China.

El resultado fue predecible.

Las compras chinas se desplazaron. Los productores estadounidenses de soya perdieron ingresos.

Los agricultores de EE. UU. —ya cargando con el costo de fricciones comerciales— recibieron aproximadamente 12 mil millones de dólares en asistencia para compensar pérdidas vinculadas a la reducción de la demanda china.

Las cifras importan, pero la secuencia importa más.

Fondos públicos estadounidenses estabilizaron una economía extranjera. Esa economía ajustó luego su postura comercial para favorecer a un competidor estratégico. Los productores estadounidenses absorbieron la pérdida, parcialmente compensada con alivio interno.

Esto no fue un intercambio ilegal.

No fue una conspiración. Fue poder transaccional operando exactamente como fue diseñado.

Y revela el problema.

Estados Unidos absorbió una pérdida de apalancamiento a largo plazo a cambio de una estabilización de corto plazo y buenos titulares —mientras competidores se beneficiaron indirectamente y los productores nacionales cargaron con el costo posterior.

Algunos activos fueron tratados como renovables. Otros ni siquiera fueron tratados como activos.

Poder transaccional vs. poder duradero

Hay dos formas en que el poder suele funcionar.

El poder transaccional es inmediato, personalizado y guiado por la óptica. Premia la velocidad. Valora la visibilidad. Produce resultados que pueden anunciarse rápidamente —y revisarse con la misma rapidez.

El poder duradero es más lento y menos dramático. Es institucional más que personal. Depende de la previsibilidad, la coherencia y la credibilidad a lo largo del tiempo. Sus beneficios rara vez hacen titulares, pero se acumulan.

El problema surge cuando el poder transaccional empieza a desplazar al poder duradero —cuando la visibilidad se confunde con apalancamiento y la decisión con fortaleza.

Cuando el poder se personaliza, las alianzas se vuelven provisionales. Cuando las reglas parecen flexibles, la paciencia se convierte en estrategia. Cuando la contención se trata como opcional, otros aprenden a esperar.

Lo que realmente escuchan los demás

El poder nunca habla solo a su propia gente.

Lo que importa no es solo lo que se dice, sino lo que se escucha.

Cuando los acuerdos se enmarcan como victorias sin importar el costo, el mensaje recibido no es eficiencia —es volatilidad. Cuando normas de larga data se tratan como negociables, la señal enviada no es realismo —es impermanencia.

No hace falta nombrar agresivamente a los adversarios para que estén escuchando. No hace falta insultar a los aliados para que sientan incertidumbre. El precedente viaja más rápido que la política, y la interpretación perdura más que la intención.

Una nación que trata su apalancamiento como transaccional enseña a otros a hacer lo mismo.

La ilusión de la fortaleza

Existe la tentación de equiparar la fortaleza con la dominación, el volumen o la capacidad de extraer concesiones inmediatas. Pero la fortaleza no se prueba por cuánto se puede tomar —se prueba por cuánto no es necesario tomar.

La verdadera fortaleza es la contención que no requiere una actuación constante. Es la credibilidad que sobrevive a los cambios de liderazgo. Es la influencia que no depende del espectáculo.

El poder que necesita anunciarse repetidamente ya está siendo puesto a prueba.

La pregunta que importa

Este momento no requiere indignación ni alineamiento ciego. Requiere claridad.

La pregunta no es si se hizo un acuerdo. La pregunta es qué nos costó hacerlo.

Lo que entregamos en silencio determina lo que perdemos después.

Y lo que perdura —confianza, legitimidad, credibilidad— no puede recuperarse a demanda.

La fortaleza no es lo que satisface el momento. La fortaleza es lo que permanece cuando el momento pasa.

© SilentSentinel, 2025. Todos los derechos reservados.

The year behind us, marked by the International Year of Cooperatives, symbolically coincided with the moment when, after years of work as an informal and widely dispersed network, we officially began the process of building the first international cooperative of visual artists headquartered in Belgrade. This step did not come out of nowhere, but as the result of years of collective work by artists, researchers, curators, cultural workers, activists, and Web3 specialists from different contexts, brought together by the need to organize artistic labour differently, through solidarity, democracy, and long-term sustainability.

Throughout 2025, the work was intensive, structured, and distinctly collective. We held more than 40 project team meetings dedicated to planning and monitoring the work of the international Shared Visions collective in building the cooperative. In parallel, we carried out 39 sessions devoted to drafting and refining the cooperative’s bylaws, through which we collectively reflected on models of governance, membership, and the distribution of resources. A particular focus was placed on understanding the context in which we operate, which is why we organized 27 working sessions dedicated to planning market research on the visual arts in the Western Balkans, including 8 focus groups and a series of interviews with artists, gallerists, collectors, and other actors on the ground. At the same time, the digital infrastructure team held 22 working meetings devoted to developing Web3 solutions, from an online gallery to systems for digital voting and cooperative governance, as well as the development of a cooperative digital currency that will enable easier collaboration among artist-members in international conditions, the socialization of resources, and the creation of cooperative ownership. We also delivered a series of workshops, public discussions, and exhibitions/ auctions in various local and international contexts, through which we tested the principles of a solidarity economy in practice and opened space for the exchange of knowledge and experience, and for a deeper understanding of the position of artists in society.

None of these processes were ends in themselves, but part of a broader effort to build a cooperative model that responds to the real conditions of artistic labour today, especially in regions that sit outside the main currents of cultural and capitalist centres. In June 2026, we plan to officially establish the cooperative, marking a new phase for Shared Visions, one in which we invite all interested artists and cultural workers to join us, contribute, and take part in shaping this structure together.

In this spirit, we enter the new year with a clear awareness of the work already invested, and with the conviction that collective effort, solidarity, and democratic self-governance can be transformed into lasting infrastructure for artistic labour and mutual support.

To everyone who has been and who continues to be part of this process, we extend our gratitude for your trust, solidarity, and contributions, and to all those who will join us in the future, we offer a warm welcome. We wish you a happy, cooperative, and creative 2026!

3 December 2025

Looking at a lot of Dürer this week. It's amazing how fresh and contemporary the work he did five hundred years ago feels to my eyes. The depth of his attention is evergreen. Seeing beyond seeing. Thought of his Christ as the Man of Sorrows (1492) while walking through Heathrow Terminal 3 when I passed by what I assume is an advertisement for Rio de Janeiro/Brazil tourism: a long, horizontal, textless image of the top half of Christ the Redeemer (1931) stretched across a cloudless blue sky. In Dürer's painting, the Christ figure is leaning on a foregrounded ledge, the plane between subject and viewer both established and broken. In the airport, the vinyl advertisement isn't bordered by any frame or support and fits quite seamlessly into the cold, glossy environment around it. Gliding by it on a moving walkway made for a strange sensation where each arm seemed to extend from the wall one at a time as I passed. This melding of perceptual planes via a figure actively stretching the confines of its medium is something I'm holding as I sit down to sketch what I'm seeing.

At the Oxfam in Monmouth on Saturday they had several flamenco LPs, of which I bought two: Flamenco Guitar and Flamenco Guitar vol. 2 by Ricardo Baliardo aka Manitas de Plata ('little silver hands'). These were 1966 releases in mono on the Philips label. The recordings had been made in Arles, France, in '63, and first issued in the U.S. in '65. The guitarist had not, before then, authorised any commercial release of his playing. As well as his guitar one hears Manitas' voice on a few of the tracks, as well as the voices of his cousin José Reyes and son Manero Baliardo. These additions have tripled my flamenco collection, which previously only included a single Paco de Lucia LP.

---

Sunday evening I enjoyed my first raclette-based meal, with the cheese melted at the table in a special-purpose raclette grill. To my mind this was a better means of distributing molten Alpine cheeses than a fondue.

Raclette, good as it was, has to share cheese of the week honours with the piece of Montgomery's Mature Cheddar I picked up from the Marches Deli in Monmouth (who have done remarkably well to re-open so soon after the damaging floods there last month). This is a dense, dry, richly savoury cheddar with mellow fruit and nut notes. My slice was also adorned with a few veins of blue mould, imparting some further complexity to its flavour.

---

I finished reading Arturo Pérez-Reverte's first novel The Fencing Master yesterday (in Margaret Jull Costa's translation), and felt well entertained by it. Had I not found it so engaging its flaws might have bothered me: the characters are all more or less stereotypical; the story takes some time to build momentum; there was one turn of the plot that struck me as highly implausible. On the plus side, it was well-written and commendably concise. Moreover its setting (Madrid in 1868) was well-realised; and the tangled political background underlying the book's events was neatly and unobtrusively sketched. It's a tale in which the titular fencing master, an old-fashioned, upright (and uptight) man in his later fifties has his world upended when an enigmatic young woman asks him for a course of lessons, thereby unwittingly drawing him in to a dangerous web of intrigue and betrayal.

Deployed on the back of my second-hand copy is a blurb calling Pérez-Reverte “The thinking man's Robert Ludlum”: were there any would-be readers actually flattered by that line? It led me to wonder, who, if anyone, might nowadays be styled the thinking man's Dan Brown? The thinking woman's Colleen Hoover?

---

Having forgotten a few items on Saturday I returned to the supermarket early this morning: it was alarmingly busy even at 06:45. My condolences to those who had to visit later.

Galatians 6 is one of those chapters that doesn’t shout. It doesn’t thunder like Sinai or soar like Romans 8. It speaks quietly, deliberately, almost pastorally, as if Paul has pulled a chair close, lowered his voice, and decided to talk about the kind of faith that shows up when no one is watching. This chapter is not about winning arguments. It’s about carrying weight. It’s about what happens after belief has settled into bones and habits and daily choices. Galatians 6 is Christianity lived at ground level.

By the time Paul reaches this chapter, he has already dismantled legalism, confronted hypocrisy, defended freedom, and insisted that salvation is not earned. But now he turns his attention to something just as difficult: what freedom actually looks like when it has to live inside real people, real relationships, and real weariness. Freedom sounds exhilarating in theory. In practice, it requires responsibility, restraint, and a kind of love that costs something.

Galatians 6 opens not with a command to correct the world, but with a command to restore one another gently. That word matters. Gently. Paul does not say aggressively. He does not say publicly. He does not say triumphantly. He assumes failure will happen among believers, and instead of panic or punishment, he prescribes restoration. This alone dismantles so much religious theater. We live in an age where exposure is rewarded, outrage is monetized, and correction is often indistinguishable from humiliation. Paul moves in the opposite direction. He insists that spiritual maturity reveals itself not in how loudly we condemn, but in how carefully we lift.

The image behind restoration is not courtroom language; it’s medical. It’s the setting of a bone. Anyone who has ever had a bone set knows that force can do damage. Precision, patience, and care matter. Paul is saying that when someone stumbles, the goal is not to prove you were right. The goal is to make them whole again. And even then, he issues a warning to the one doing the restoring: watch yourself. Not because you’re superior, but because you’re vulnerable too. This is not a hierarchy of holiness. It’s a shared weakness under grace.

Then comes one of the most misunderstood tensions in Scripture. Paul says, “Carry one another’s burdens,” and just a few verses later, he says, “Each one should carry their own load.” At first glance, that sounds contradictory. But Paul is too careful a thinker for that. The words he uses matter. A burden is something crushing, something you cannot carry alone. A load is the normal weight of responsibility assigned to a person. In other words, Christianity does not erase personal responsibility, but it refuses to let people be crushed in isolation.

This distinction is desperately needed today. We live in a culture that swings wildly between extremes. On one side, radical individualism tells people they are on their own, that needing help is weakness, and that everyone must manage their own pain privately. On the other side, there is a tendency to offload responsibility entirely, to make every struggle someone else’s fault or problem. Paul refuses both distortions. He says, in effect, “You are responsible for your walk, but you are not meant to walk alone.”

Galatians 6 insists that real community is not theoretical. It’s practical. It costs time, attention, emotional energy, and sometimes inconvenience. Bearing burdens means entering into another person’s pain without trying to fix it too quickly or explain it away spiritually. It means listening without preparing a sermon. It means showing up even when you don’t know what to say. Paul is not describing a church that merely agrees on doctrine. He is describing a church that shares weight.

Then Paul turns his attention inward, toward the subtle ways pride corrodes spiritual life. “If anyone thinks they are something when they are not,” he says, “they deceive themselves.” This is not an attack on confidence. It is an exposure of self-deception. Spiritual pride is particularly dangerous because it disguises itself as maturity. It compares itself favorably to others. It keeps score. It quietly needs someone else to fail in order to feel secure.

Paul dismantles this by removing comparison altogether. He says each person should test their own work, not against others, but against the calling God has placed on them. Comparison always distorts vision. It either inflates ego or breeds despair. Both outcomes poison obedience. Paul redirects attention away from the crowd and back toward faithfulness. Did you do what God asked you to do? Did you walk in step with the Spirit you were given? That is the only measure that holds weight here.

This leads naturally into Paul’s teaching on sowing and reaping, one of the most quoted and least patiently understood principles in Scripture. “Do not be deceived,” he says. “God is not mocked. A person reaps what they sow.” This is not a threat. It is a reality. Paul is describing the moral structure of the universe, not laying out a vending machine theology. Sowing and reaping is slow. It is cumulative. It is often invisible until suddenly it isn’t.

We live in a culture addicted to immediacy. We want instant results, overnight transformations, viral success. Paul’s worldview is agricultural. He assumes time. He assumes seasons. He assumes faithfulness that looks boring before it looks beautiful. When he talks about sowing to the flesh versus sowing to the Spirit, he is not talking about isolated actions. He is talking about patterns. What you consistently feed grows. What you consistently neglect withers.

Sowing to the flesh does not always look scandalous. Often it looks respectable. It can look like resentment carefully justified. It can look like bitterness rehearsed privately. It can look like ego fed by subtle superiority. The flesh thrives on small permissions granted repeatedly. Sowing to the Spirit, on the other hand, often looks unimpressive at first. It looks like obedience when no applause follows. It looks like kindness when it is not returned. It looks like restraint when indulgence would be easier.

Paul knows how discouraging this can feel, which is why he adds one of the most compassionate exhortations in the entire letter: “Let us not become weary in doing good, for at the proper time we will reap a harvest if we do not give up.” That phrase assumes weariness. It does not shame it. It names it. Paul understands that doing good can exhaust you, especially when results are delayed and recognition is absent.

Weariness is one of the great spiritual battlegrounds. Most people do not abandon faith because they are suddenly convinced it is false. They drift because they are tired. Tired of forgiving. Tired of trying. Tired of hoping. Galatians 6 does not scold the weary; it speaks directly to them. It says timing belongs to God. Harvests are real, but they are not rushed by anxiety or secured by quitting.

Paul then narrows the focus even further: “As we have opportunity, let us do good to all people, especially to those who belong to the family of believers.” This is not favoritism; it is realism. Love has concentric circles. Compassion radiates outward, but it starts somewhere specific. The church is meant to be a training ground for love, not a showroom for perfection. If kindness cannot survive inside the family, it will not sustain itself outside.

Toward the end of the chapter, Paul takes the pen into his own hand. He draws attention to his large letters, not to impress, but to emphasize sincerity. He contrasts those who boast in outward markers with the one thing he will boast in: the cross. Not as a symbol, not as a slogan, but as the place where the old self died. Paul has no interest in religious performance that avoids death. The cross dismantles ego. It silences comparison. It levels every hierarchy built on achievement.

When Paul says, “Neither circumcision nor uncircumcision means anything; what counts is the new creation,” he is not dismissing obedience. He is redefining significance. External markers without inner transformation are hollow. The gospel does not produce better badges; it produces new people. New creation language is not about minor improvement. It is about fundamental reorientation. New loves. New loyalties. New reflexes over time.

Galatians 6 ends with a blessing, not a command. Grace, Paul reminds them, is not a starting line you leave behind. It is the atmosphere in which the entire Christian life is lived. Grace does not excuse passivity, but it does empower perseverance. It is what allows a person to carry both responsibility and compassion without collapsing under the weight.

This chapter leaves us with a quiet but demanding vision of faith. Not flashy. Not loud. Faith that restores gently. Faith that carries burdens wisely. Faith that resists comparison. Faith that sows patiently. Faith that does not quit when tired. Faith that boasts only in the cross because it knows everything else is fragile.

Galatians 6 is not about how to look spiritual. It is about how to live faithful over time. It is for people who are still walking, still carrying, still planting seeds they may never personally see fully grown. It is for those who suspect that holiness is less about dramatic moments and more about sustained love in ordinary days.

And perhaps that is the quiet weight Paul wants us to carry: not the pressure to impress God, but the invitation to live as people who have already been changed, already been freed, and are now learning, slowly and imperfectly, how to love like it matters.

If Galatians 6 has a pulse, it beats strongest in its insistence that faith must endure. Not perform. Not posture. Endure. Paul is writing to people who have already been burned once by religious pressure, people who were told they needed more, needed proof, needed external validation to be truly accepted. And now, instead of giving them a new list, he gives them something far more demanding and far more freeing: a way of life shaped by patience.

One of the hardest truths in Galatians 6 is that spiritual fruit does not ripen on our timeline. Paul does not promise quick returns. He promises eventual harvest. That distinction matters. A harvest delayed can feel like a harvest denied, especially when you are doing the right things and still seeing little outward change. Many believers quietly assume that obedience should produce visible results quickly. When it doesn’t, discouragement sets in, followed by doubt, followed by exhaustion.

Paul knows this pattern. That is why he anchors encouragement not in outcomes, but in faithfulness. “At the proper time,” he says. Not your time. Not the time you would choose. The proper time. That phrase requires trust. It assumes that God sees the whole field, not just the patch you are standing in. It assumes that growth is happening underground long before it ever breaks the surface.

This is where modern faith often breaks down. We live in a metrics-driven world. Numbers, engagement, results, validation. Even spiritual life can quietly absorb this logic. We start measuring our faith by visible success, emotional highs, or public impact. Galatians 6 gently but firmly dismantles that framework. Paul measures faith by persistence. By continued obedience when applause fades. By love that keeps showing up long after novelty wears off.

There is also something deeply countercultural in Paul’s insistence that doing good will make you tired. He does not spiritualize away fatigue. He does not accuse the weary of lacking faith. He names weariness as part of the cost. That honesty matters because many believers feel shame for being tired, as if exhaustion itself were evidence of spiritual failure. Paul says the opposite. Weariness often means you have been faithful for a long time.

But he also draws a line. Weariness is acknowledged; quitting is challenged. “Let us not give up.” That phrase is not harsh. It is steady. Paul is not shouting from a distance. He is walking alongside them, using “us,” including himself in the struggle. This is not the language of a detached theologian. It is the voice of someone who knows what it means to be worn down by doing good in a resistant world.

Galatians 6 also confronts the temptation to narrow compassion when energy runs low. “Let us do good to all people,” Paul says. That word all is expansive. It refuses the instinct to ration kindness only to those who deserve it, agree with us, or repay us. Yet Paul is realistic. He knows we are finite. So he adds, “especially to those who belong to the family of believers.” This is not exclusion; it is prioritization.

The church, in Paul’s vision, is meant to be the safest place to practice sacrificial love. Not because everyone gets it right, but because everyone is learning together. If believers cannot extend grace within the family, they will struggle to sustain it outside. Galatians 6 assumes the church will be messy. That is why restoration, burden-bearing, patience, and humility are not optional extras. They are survival skills.

As the chapter moves toward its conclusion, Paul does something unusual. He draws attention to his handwriting. Scholars debate the exact reason, but the effect is clear. Paul wants them to know this matters deeply to him. This is not abstract theology. This is personal. He contrasts himself with those who pressure others into outward conformity for the sake of appearances. These people, Paul says, want to avoid persecution. They want approval without cost.

Paul refuses that path. His only boast is the cross. Not because it is inspiring in the sentimental sense, but because it is devastating to human pride. The cross leaves no room for self-congratulation. It exposes the bankruptcy of religious performance and the futility of earning righteousness. To boast in the cross is to admit that everything essential has already been done for you, and that your role now is response, not achievement.

When Paul says the world has been crucified to him and he to the world, he is not retreating from society. He is declaring independence from its value system. The cross reorders what matters. Status, recognition, comparison, religious superiority—all of it loses its grip. What remains is a new creation, a life no longer defined by external markers but by internal transformation.

That phrase—new creation—is easy to gloss over because it is familiar. But it is radical. Paul is not talking about self-improvement. He is not talking about religious refinement. He is talking about re-creation. A new orientation of desire. A new center of gravity. A life reshaped from the inside out over time. This is not instantaneous perfection. It is sustained change.

Galatians 6 closes with peace and mercy pronounced over those who walk by this rule. Not those who master it. Not those who never stumble. Those who walk by it. Walking assumes movement, missteps, correction, continuation. Grace, Paul reminds them one last time, is not something you graduate from. It is what makes walking possible at all.

This chapter leaves us with a sobering but hopeful truth. Faith is not proven in moments of intensity alone. It is revealed in endurance. In the quiet decision to keep planting seeds when no one is watching. In the choice to restore instead of shame. To carry burdens without abandoning responsibility. To resist comparison. To trust timing you cannot control.

Galatians 6 is not flashy. It will not trend easily. But it forms people who last. People whose lives are shaped not by urgency, but by faithfulness. People who understand that obedience is often slow, unseen, and deeply meaningful precisely because of that.

In a world obsessed with speed, Galatians 6 teaches us the long obedience of love. And in doing so, it reminds us that the harvest is real—even if it comes later than we hoped—and that grace is still enough to carry us there.

Your friend, Douglas Vandergraph

Watch Douglas Vandergraph’s inspiring faith-based videos on YouTube

Support the ministry by buying Douglas a coffee

#Faith #ChristianLiving #Galatians6 #BiblicalReflection #Grace #Perseverance #SpiritualGrowth #ChristianEncouragement

1 December 2025

Finding ways to stay in motion is becoming helpful toward honing my focal endurance. I savor what I see when I may never see it again, and there's something about the impossibility of parsing each day's avalanche of visual stimuli that makes trying to do so a creatively fertile place to start work from. Because the digestion is happening regardless—someone at the open studio asked if I had seen One Battle After Another before I painted On diversion, and indeed I had (it appears the hilly car chase scene got in there). The effect of here it comes and there it goes, again and again, each oscillation distinct from the last and yet sequenced.

A rehearsal studio somewhere in England. 1978.

Enter Roger Waters.

RW: Right, lads, remember when I spit on that bloke at one of our shows?

David Gilmour: Bang out of order, that was.

RW: I know! So it’s got me thinking about the barrier between performer and audience! And I’ve figured out what to do!

Nick Mason: Leave our stately homes and go down the pub, listen to the punters, get in touch with the common man?

DG: Play some shows in some small venues? Stripped down, initmate?

RW: SILENCE! I have a vision! Double concept album! Enormous stage show! Custom animations projected on screens! Gigantic puppets!

NM: And this is supposed to bring us closer to the audience?

DG: (nudges Nick) Shhh. You know you can’t interrupt him when he’s like this.

RW: I shall call it: The Wall!

NM: (quietly, to Gilmour) The Bin, more like.

DG: Shh! I told you, we only have to put up with him for 2 more albums.

NM: He says this one’s a double. Does that count as two?

DG: No.

NM: Bloody hell.

A rehearsal studio in Laurel Canyon. 1978

Lindsey Buckingham: Okay, guys, so I’ve been thinking about how we follow up the biggest album of all time. So I’ve been listening to what the kids are into, and I’ve gotten inspired!

Stevie Nicks: I thought I was your inspiration.

LB: I mean, we can only break up so many times…

SN: (Angrily lights incense, twirls, chants in a pre-modern Celtic tongue)

LB: So, anyway, my inspiration for the new project? Punk Rock.

Mick Fleetwood. (Stubs out a joint, pulls a Scarface-sized tray of coke in front of him) So. Playing fast, is that it?

LB: No, it’s not the sound of punk I’m interested in. It’s the energy, the immediacy! I was thinking we could—

Christine McVie: Record live in the studio?

LB: NO! We will each lay down our respective tracks over and over again until it sounds perfect!

John McVie: I’m in this band, you know. Have been from the beginning.

MF: Course you have, John. There’s a good lad.

CM: So what, we’re going to play some clubs, work out songs in front of an audience instead of disappearing up our aresholes in the studio for—

LB: SILENCE! We will do everything as we always have! Our production will be so perfect we’ll make Steely Dan weep with envy!

CM: So what’s the—

LB: Marching band! What says punk rock louder than a marching band?

CM: I…just about anything, I suppose.

SN: (stops twirling) I’ve got a song about having sex with a sixteen year old boy.

(Silence)

MF: Right, we’re doing Lindsey’s thing.

To be loved is to be seen.

I've been out nightswimming and trying not to breathe, but nature called and I couldn't resist the little things that pull you under—filling life with joy and wonder.

I've been reading dancing and writing in the sanskrit of dreams.

So I’ll end this the way I hope you end your days— quietly, without needing to explain yourself to anyone. If the night feels heavy, let it be. If the water is cold, step in anyway. There is no prize for holding your breath longer than you should.

Standing here at the edge of existence, basking in the gossamer filaments of being alive and feeling it all.

I see you.

Not the version you offer the world, but the one who moves slowly when no one is watching, who listens with her whole body, who knows exactly how much to give.

A visage un-shrouded—a blossom in bloom.

I love you in that private way— the way that doesn’t reach, doesn’t take, but stays close enough to feel the heat.

Thank you for the music.

For the nights that linger on my skin. For trusting me with what you don’t say out loud.

When you follow the river, think of me standing at the edge, bathed with light, seamless and present, heart very much awake— wanting nothing more than for you to feel held, exactly as you are.

Words of power wash over and down, Then through you.

And I witness as respiration freezes, Tension of breath held— Energy stayed, learning the shape and presense Of us both. Felt, but unseen.

Unreleased.

Remember to breathe—the air already thin at this altitude, will supercharge your heart.

Galatians 5 is one of those chapters that sounds familiar enough to be dangerous. Many people can quote pieces of it. “It is for freedom that Christ has set us free.” “The fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace…” These lines show up on mugs, wall art, social media posts, and sermons so often that we can forget how disruptive they actually are. This chapter is not gentle. It is not trying to soothe anyone who wants to stay comfortable. Galatians 5 is a declaration of independence from every system—religious or cultural—that tries to manage people through fear, guilt, or control. And if we read it honestly, it will unsettle us before it ever comforts us.

Paul is not writing abstract theology here. He is fighting for real people who are being slowly pulled back into spiritual bondage, not by obvious evil, but by something that looks respectable, disciplined, and even holy. The Galatian believers had started with grace. They encountered Christ freely. They experienced transformation without being managed. But then, little by little, voices crept in telling them that freedom was incomplete without rules. That faith needed reinforcement through external markers. That belonging to God required conformity to religious expectations. Paul sees exactly where this road leads, and he does not soften his words.

Galatians 5 begins with a sentence that should stop us in our tracks if we take it seriously. “It is for freedom that Christ has set us free. Stand firm, then, and do not let yourselves be burdened again by a yoke of slavery.” That line assumes something many of us do not like to admit: freedom can be lost. Not stolen by force, but surrendered voluntarily. You can be free in Christ and still choose chains because they feel familiar. You can prefer structure over trust. You can trade relationship for regulation because rules feel safer than reliance on the Spirit.

Paul’s concern is not merely theological correctness. His concern is what happens to the human soul when it begins to measure its worth through performance again. The moment faith becomes a system of maintenance instead of a life of dependence, something breaks. The moment righteousness becomes something you manage instead of something you receive, anxiety returns. Comparison returns. Fear returns. And eventually, control replaces love as the dominant motivator.

What makes Galatians 5 so uncomfortable is that Paul does not aim his warning at obvious legalists alone. He aims it at believers who genuinely want to honor God but are being convinced that grace is insufficient by itself. That is where the danger lives. Rarely does spiritual bondage announce itself as bondage. It presents itself as maturity, discipline, responsibility, or “going deeper.” Paul cuts through that illusion by saying something radical: if you add requirements to Christ, you lose Christ. Not partially. Completely.

He tells them plainly that if they let themselves be circumcised as a requirement for belonging, Christ will be of no value to them at all. That sentence is shocking, and many readers try to soften it. But Paul does not soften it. He means exactly what he says. The issue is not the physical act; it is the spiritual logic behind it. The moment you accept one requirement as necessary for righteousness, you obligate yourself to the entire system. Grace cannot coexist with performance as co-saviors. One will always cancel the other.

This is where Galatians 5 begins to expose our modern equivalents. Most of us are not being pressured into circumcision. But we are constantly being pressured into measurable spirituality. Quiet times that prove devotion. Behavior checklists that signal maturity. Cultural stances that mark belonging. Language cues that identify insiders. Political alignments that masquerade as righteousness. None of these things are inherently evil, but the moment they become conditions for acceptance, the gospel is no longer the gospel.

Paul’s language becomes even sharper when he says that those who are trying to be justified by the law have been alienated from Christ and have fallen away from grace. That phrase, “fallen away from grace,” is often misunderstood. Paul is not saying they committed a moral failure. He is saying they changed operating systems. They moved from grace as their foundation to self-effort as their framework. Grace did not leave them; they left grace.

This is where Galatians 5 becomes deeply personal. Many believers do not reject grace outright. They simply treat it as an entry point instead of a way of life. Grace gets you saved, but effort keeps you acceptable. Grace forgives, but discipline earns favor. Grace covers the past, but rules secure the future. Paul dismantles that entire structure. He insists that the same grace that saved you is the grace that sustains you, shapes you, and produces fruit in you.

And that leads to one of the most misunderstood tensions in this chapter: freedom versus self-indulgence. Paul knows exactly how his message could be twisted. If there is no law keeping us in line, then what stops chaos? If righteousness is not enforced externally, then what prevents moral collapse? Paul answers this not with new rules, but with a deeper trust in transformation. He says that freedom is not an invitation to gratify the flesh, but an invitation to serve one another humbly in love.

That line reveals something profound. True freedom does not remove responsibility; it relocates it. Instead of being controlled by external commands, the believer is now guided by love. Instead of asking, “What is allowed?” the question becomes, “What builds others up?” Love becomes the governing force, not fear of punishment or desire for reward.

Paul summarizes the entire law with one command: love your neighbor as yourself. This is not a downgrade from complexity to simplicity. It is a move from surface obedience to internal transformation. Rules can regulate behavior, but love reshapes motivation. And that is why Paul warns that when communities abandon love, they inevitably turn on each other. “If you bite and devour each other,” he says, “watch out or you will be destroyed by each other.” Legalism always produces hostility because it thrives on comparison. Someone must always be doing better or worse for the system to function.

Then Paul introduces the concept that anchors the rest of the chapter: walking by the Spirit. This is not mystical language meant to confuse. It is relational language meant to liberate. Walking implies movement, attentiveness, and trust. You do not walk by memorizing rules. You walk by responding to presence. The Spirit is not a checklist; the Spirit is a guide.

Paul describes an internal conflict that every honest believer recognizes. The flesh desires what is contrary to the Spirit, and the Spirit desires what is contrary to the flesh. This is not an excuse for failure; it is an explanation of tension. Christianity does not eliminate struggle. It redefines the battlefield. The struggle is no longer about earning acceptance but about choosing which voice to follow.

What matters here is Paul’s conclusion: if you are led by the Spirit, you are not under the law. That does not mean moral anarchy. It means a different source of authority. The law tells you what to do from the outside. The Spirit transforms your desires from the inside. One restrains behavior; the other renews the heart.

Paul then lists the acts of the flesh, and many readers focus on this section as if it is the main point. It is not. The list is descriptive, not prescriptive. Paul is not handing down a new law code. He is showing what happens when desire is disconnected from love and guided by self. The list spans obvious moral failures and socially acceptable sins alike. Sexual immorality sits next to jealousy. Drunkenness appears alongside selfish ambition. This alone dismantles our habit of ranking sins to protect our image.

What is striking is Paul’s warning that those who live like this will not inherit the kingdom of God. He is not talking about isolated failures or moments of weakness. He is talking about a way of life that resists transformation. A life consistently oriented around self rather than love is incompatible with the kingdom because the kingdom itself is built on self-giving love.

But Paul does not leave us in warning. He moves us toward hope. And that hope arrives not as a command but as fruit.

The fruit of the Spirit is not something you manufacture. Fruit grows when conditions are right. You do not strain to produce fruit; you remain connected to the source. Love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control are not personality traits reserved for a few. They are evidence of a life rooted in the Spirit.

This is where many believers feel tension. We read this list and immediately start evaluating ourselves. How loving am I? How patient was I this week? Do I have enough self-control? But Paul never intended this list to become another measuring stick. Fruit is not a performance metric. It is a sign of life. The question is not, “Am I producing enough?” The question is, “What am I rooted in?”

Paul ends this section by saying that against such things there is no law. That line is easy to overlook, but it is powerful. Where the Spirit is producing fruit, rules become unnecessary. You do not need a law to command kindness when kindness flows naturally. You do not need a regulation against envy when contentment has taken root.

Those who belong to Christ, Paul says, have crucified the flesh with its passions and desires. This does not mean desire disappears. It means desire is no longer in control. The old self that demanded satisfaction at any cost has lost its authority. A new life has begun, not one driven by repression, but one guided by transformation.

Paul’s final exhortation in this chapter is simple and demanding: since we live by the Spirit, let us keep in step with the Spirit. That phrase suggests alignment, not anxiety. You can be alive in the Spirit and still walk out of rhythm. Keeping in step requires attention, humility, and responsiveness. It requires letting go of comparison and competition, which Paul names explicitly. Conceit, provocation, and envy are signs that we have slipped back into performance mode.

Galatians 5 leaves us with a choice that feels both freeing and frightening. We can live managed lives, where righteousness is measured, enforced, and displayed. Or we can live led lives, where righteousness is formed quietly, deeply, and relationally. One offers control. The other requires trust.

This chapter is not calling us to try harder. It is calling us to surrender deeper. Not to abandon holiness, but to stop outsourcing holiness to systems that cannot produce life. Freedom in Christ is not the absence of direction. It is the presence of the Spirit.

And that raises a question we cannot avoid: are we willing to live unprotected by rules if it means being fully dependent on grace?

Galatians 5 does not end with fireworks or flourish. It ends quietly, almost dangerously quietly, with a call to alignment. “Since we live by the Spirit, let us keep in step with the Spirit.” That sentence sounds gentle, but it dismantles an entire way of approaching faith. It assumes that the Christian life is not primarily about achieving milestones or maintaining appearances, but about learning to listen, adjust, and respond in real time. It assumes that God is present, active, and communicative, not distant and procedural. And for many believers, that assumption is more unsettling than any list of commands.

Because rules create distance. They give us space to hide. If righteousness is defined externally, then obedience can be mechanical. You can comply without being transformed. You can perform without being known. Walking by the Spirit removes that buffer. It means God is not merely evaluating outcomes; He is shaping desires. It means the work of holiness happens in places no one else sees—intentions, reactions, impulses, internal narratives. And that level of intimacy cannot be managed through religious systems alone.

This is why Galatians 5 is not a chapter about moral improvement. It is a chapter about identity. Paul is not trying to produce better-behaved people. He is fighting to preserve a way of life where identity flows from relationship, not regulation. Everything in this chapter hinges on who defines you. If your identity is anchored in Christ, then freedom makes sense. If your identity is anchored in performance, then freedom feels reckless.

Paul understands that humans are drawn to systems because systems feel secure. They offer predictability. They tell you where you stand. They provide measurable progress. But they also subtly replace trust with transaction. If I do this, then I am accepted. If I avoid that, then I belong. Over time, the heart learns to negotiate with God instead of resting in Him.

Galatians 5 exposes how fragile that arrangement is. Because the moment you fail—and everyone eventually does—the system turns on you. Shame enters. Fear returns. And instead of running toward grace, people either double down on effort or quietly withdraw. Neither response produces life. Paul knows this. That is why he insists that freedom is not optional in the gospel. It is essential.

One of the most overlooked aspects of Galatians 5 is how communal it is. This chapter is not written to isolated individuals trying to be spiritually impressive. It is written to a community being torn apart by competing definitions of righteousness. When freedom is replaced with performance, comparison becomes inevitable. People begin to measure themselves against one another. Spiritual pride grows. Judgment hardens. And love erodes.

Paul’s warning about biting and devouring one another is not hyperbole. Communities built on performance always fracture. Someone will always feel superior, and someone will always feel excluded. But communities rooted in the Spirit grow differently. Fruit is not compared; it is shared. Love does not compete. Joy does not diminish when others experience it. Peace is not threatened by difference.

This is where the fruit of the Spirit becomes more than a personal checklist. It becomes a communal vision. Imagine a community where love governs disagreement, where patience shapes conversations, where gentleness is not mistaken for weakness, and where self-control restrains ego rather than desire alone. That kind of community cannot be engineered. It cannot be mandated. It can only be cultivated through shared dependence on the Spirit.

Paul’s emphasis on crucifying the flesh is often misunderstood as harsh self-denial. But in the context of Galatians 5, it is not about suppressing humanity; it is about dethroning it. The flesh Paul describes is not the body itself but the self-centered orientation that insists on control. Crucifying the flesh means releasing the need to be right, to be superior, to be validated through comparison. It means letting go of the false self that thrives on applause and certainty.

What replaces it is not emptiness, but life. “Since we live by the Spirit…” Paul does not say “since we are trying to live” or “since we hope to live.” He states it as a present reality. Life has already been given. The question is whether we will live in alignment with that life or resist it by clinging to familiar patterns.

Keeping in step with the Spirit implies attentiveness. It implies humility. You cannot keep in step if you are always rushing ahead to prove something or lagging behind out of fear. You keep in step by paying attention. By noticing when love is being replaced with irritation. By recognizing when freedom is being traded for control. By listening when the Spirit nudges you toward generosity, restraint, courage, or compassion.

This kind of life does not photograph well. It does not always look impressive. It often looks ordinary. But it is deeply transformative. Over time, fruit grows. Not because you are striving to be spiritual, but because you are remaining connected to the source of life.

Galatians 5 ultimately asks us to trust something deeper than our ability to manage ourselves. It asks us to trust that God is capable of producing righteousness in us through relationship rather than regulation. That the Spirit can do what rules never could. That freedom, rightly understood, does not lead away from holiness but straight into it.

The tragedy Paul is trying to prevent is not moral failure. It is spiritual amnesia. Forgetting how you began. Forgetting who set you free. Forgetting that grace was never meant to be replaced, only lived out. The moment faith becomes about maintaining status instead of abiding in love, the gospel has been reduced to a system it was meant to dismantle.

Galatians 5 does not give us more to do. It gives us more to trust. It invites us to stop asking whether we are allowed and start asking whether we are aligned. It calls us away from fear-based obedience and toward love-shaped freedom. And it reminds us that the Christian life is not about proving anything to God, but about walking with Him.

Freedom does not need permission. It only needs courage.

Your friend, Douglas Vandergraph

Watch Douglas Vandergraph’s inspiring faith-based videos on YouTube.

Support the ministry by buying Douglas a coffee.

Today has been a good day! I was with my sister in law in her electric car, drinking vanilla latte with her young son sleeping in the backseat.

She was shopping for groceries and in my mind, I was thinking about Celine Dion; about how her singing voice speaks (no: sings) directly to my heart. There’s nothing about her which I don’t love. A voice of an angel although now her duet with R-Kelly (I’m you angel) leaves a bitter aftertaste.

I am feeling pretty ok although I speak slowly. I think it’s cause I think slowly too, like my brain wasn’t in my head, but rather maybe in India, having a laggy SSH or Remote desktop or maybe KVM session which then comes with increased latency or even packet loss.

But it’s good. The coffee tastes good. Being able to help just by sitting there, watching her little cute child, it feels good. And just like the right amount of responsibility for me right now.

Just feels OK