This is a deep dive into the anonymous claims that captivated the UFO community in 2023'

In April 2023, an anonymous poster appeared on 4chan's /x/ board with a simple opening line:

“I have intimate knowledge of what the US currently knows about UFOs minus the last two years.”

He claimed to be a former insider with access to UFO crash recoveries and classified programs, now undergoing chemotherapy for liver cancer. Facing the possibility of not having much time left, he chose the most chaotic confession booth imaginable: a 4chan thread.

Over the course of two lengthy sessions spanning nearly two weeks, this individual answered hundreds of questions with an unusual level of consistency and detail that set their posts apart from the typical “LARP” (Live Action Role Play) that plagues anonymous forums.

Whether genuine insider or elaborate fiction, these threads offer one of the most comprehensive, internally consistent accounts of alleged government UFO knowledge ever posted online. They have already become a notable node in modern UFO lore.

This is their story.

The Start

The first post arrived on April 24, 2023, with five core claims that would frame everything that followed:

1. UFOs are primarily unmanned drones

2. UFOs are built to specification each time they are deployed

3. UFOs are created by a mobile construction facility hiding in the ocean

4. This construction facility destroys anything that approaches it

5. The U.S. believes this facility has been active on Earth for at least 100 years, possibly much longer

These claims immediately distinguished the poster from typical UFO narratives. No talk of crashed saucers from Zeta Reticuli, no galactic federations, no channeled messages from Ashtar Command. Instead, the picture that emerged was almost industrial: a manufacturing operation, hidden beneath the waves, churning out specialized drones for specific missions before recycling them back into raw materials.

“Atlantis”: The Underwater UFO Factory

Perhaps the most striking element of the whistleblower's account is the construction facility itself, jokingly dubbed “Atlantis” by older team members. When asked what it looked like, the poster provided surprising detail.

Q: What does it look like?

A: Shaped like an extremely large UFO but more of a “burger” design. Almost never leaves the Atlantic Ocean, in fact it will sit through hurricanes. No visible weapons or “cockpit” from sat footage. It also does not use any lights. The main construction facility does not rust or deteriorate from what we can tell.

The method of tracking this facility raised eyebrows:

Q: How do you track it?

A: We rely mostly on detecting the gravity it produces. It normally doesn't produce heat outright. When it does we believe it's in the process of construction since a small heat buildup can be detected when a craft returns or exits.

But the most chilling detail concerned what happens when humans get too close:

Q: What happens when you approach it?

A: The last unit we saw approach the facility didn't even have time to communicate they were being attacked before it was over. At one point we deployed fighters and a sub with serious intent. Everything except the sub was lost. This weapon destroys the matter it hits entirely. It also shits on anything electronic in the vicinity.

When craft return to this facility, heat signatures suggest they're smelted back down into component parts. This recycling operation explains why so few intact craft are ever recovered:

Q: Do the UAPs return to the manufacturing unit?

A: Yes, some come in and leave the planet but very rarely. Based on heat signatures likely smelted back down into parts. It feels more like a carrier but with construction capability.

The poster also suspects this may not be the only facility. With increasing attention on polar regions, he believes other units might exist, including one in the Arctic.

The Craft Themselves

The whistleblower's description of the craft challenges some popular UFO imagery while confirming others.

On shapes:

Q: What shapes have you seen?

A: Things like triangles and hard-edged squares don't exist. Pill shapes are extremely sought after, some we think are “freighters.” Cigar shaped are very rare, we were told finding one would be career changing.

The materials presented unique challenges:

Q: What are they made of?

A: An alloy that we cannot reproduce but only repurpose. This alloy is kind of like a “film” that fits over the frame of the craft. One of the main problems when repurposing these alloys is getting them hot enough. They absorb heat very well.

On the power source, the poster confirmed a name familiar to anyone who has followed UFO lore:

Q: What powers them?

A: The power source is E115. It produces its own gravity field. Bob Lazar handled E115 which was already pulled out which is rare and weird. Protocol now is that only one person is allowed to handle E115. We still have trouble producing this shit too.

When someone pointed out that Element 115 decays in milliseconds under lab conditions, the response was blunt:

Q: Element 115 nuclei lasts for milliseconds before disintegrating under lab conditions.

A: Correct. Still a massive problem.

The interiors matched what you might expect from craft not designed for human proportions:

Q: What does the interior look like?

A: Always cramped and hard to stand fully upright in. For reference I'm 5'8. There is almost never a storage facility unless dedicated to something for the craft. Tools are not freely placed around and have dedicated placement.

On stealth capabilities:

Q: Do they have stealth capabilities?

A: Maybe 1 in 20 has stealth technology. These crafts are so rare we actually almost never see them crash because we can't track them.

Types of UFO Lights and What They Mean

One of the most practical revelations concerned the meaning of different light colors observed on UFOs:

Q: What about the lights on craft?

A: Orange is a mineral/bio-scanning mode. Since most people see orange up close you're likely being scouted/selected for an abduction. It can see your heart beating and even the valves pushing the blood inside. Red lights are defense mode, the craft wants to leave and has to keep an eye on you. Red also allows very accurate calculation of distance and can detect hostility based on facial expression. If a weapon is fired the “beam” is white.

This color-coding system, if accurate, provides witnesses with a framework for understanding what they're experiencing during an encounter. Orange means you're being studied. Red means they want out. White means something is being destroyed.

The Occupants: “Earth’s Zookeepers”

The beings operating these craft match the classic “Gray” description:

Q: Are “aliens” human or humanoid?

A: Humanoid, very humanoid. They are smaller than humans and look like your typical “Gray” aliens. Holes for ears and they can look at very bright objects without being blinded. I've never seen one move their mouth.

On the question of gender:

Q: Are they male or female?

A: We haven't seen any females. We think it's mainly a military operation or they just don't have them hence male only.

When asked if a human could win a physical confrontation:

Q: Could a human physically best them?

A: I'm not an expert but probably. Their size and frame are one reason they don't make it through crashes often.

But the most memorable exchange came when someone asked what they think of us:

Q: What do they think of us?

A: One of the officials in charge said something that stuck with me: “They act like keepers of a zoo uninterested in the daily life of wildlife until there's a problem.” They cut their losses when crashes are recovered, same with personnel. Zoo keepers aren't friends with the animals.

When pressed on why they don't recover their dead or crashed craft:

Q: Why don't they recover their dead or crashed craft?

A: No idea. They cut their losses. Have any retarded cousins that destroy everything they touch? When do you want to see them again?

Abductions

The thread's discussion of abduction tools paints a disturbing picture that strips away any New Age romanticism about “star family” contact:

Q: What about abduction tools?

A: There are tools that induce a child-like state or something akin to having a stroke. Tools designed to take objects the size of pills and push them deep into your tissue and stomach, these tools aren't friendly and don't account for extreme pain. There's also a tool that looks like a circular battery designed for keeping your eyes open when deployed. It also stops the eye from moving almost perfectly.

Selection criteria for abductees followed a disturbing pattern:

Q: Do we know why certain individuals are selected for abduction?

A: They like picking from remote areas exposed to radiation or disease. They have a distinct fascination with radiation. When Fukushima happened the construction facility deployed multiple UFOs to the location over multiple weeks.

On the “orbs” commonly reported by witnesses:

Q: What about the “orbs” people see?

A: There are tools shaped like “hammers.” They emit extremely bright light and are used as a sort of drone or scout. They are able to view almost 360 degrees and detect everything from minerals to bio.

The Crash Recovery Process

The whistleblower claimed to work on “Team 2” of crash recovery operations:

Q: Walk through the process of a crash recovery?

A: First team deals with occupants and initial discovery. We arrive and meet with an external member who can touch and examine parts we are not allowed to interact with. We never have to cut our way into the UFO. First order of business is checking for E115 then leaving the ship to send it away. We return and look for any tools and loose objects that can be extracted. We then strip any specialized components, sensory equipment or navigation. A third and fourth team arrive to remove the bulk of the craft.

One haunting detail emerged about living occupants:

Q: What about living occupants?

A: One example was shortly after I joined, one was downed but two occupants were alive. The first team couldn't get close without being attacked. Aliens never seem to recover their lost UFOs so they just waited a few days until they died then recovered the UFO.

Government Structure & Secrecy

The organizational picture that emerged is one of extreme compartmentalization:

Q: What is the main body of government collecting information on UFOs?

A: It doesn't officially exist and I won't use the internal name on here either.

Q: Is the USAF kept in the dark?

A: The USAF is kept in the dark. We operated above them. A close coworker wondered if even the president knew, namely Trump because we both thought he would just tell everyone. I heard the phrase “Fuck Bill Clinton” thrown around regarding access to information. I'm pretty sure he asked.

On Space Force's role:

Q: What role will Space Force play?

A: Openly stated to us: discovery for internal use and disinformation to the public.

When asked why keep it secret:

Q: Why keep it secret?

A: Because most governments think the local population is stupid. They're not wrong. I do think the initial panic would be really bad, especially for religious communities.

But the whistleblower offered a surprisingly candid assessment about the state of secrecy:

Q: How have they maintained secrecy?

A: They haven't been able to maintain secrecy. That's a major reason the previous management didn't mind us being so open with each other. Now you know why I find references to MJ12 funny. Secrecy is all but gone, now it's just about obfuscation and misinformation.

Reverse Engineering: Who Has What?

The global picture painted a competitive landscape:

Q: What about other countries?

A: We used to laugh at Russian and Chinese designs. We stopped laughing at China when they produced an operational (but buggy) version of their mining equipment. Still stumps most of our engineers. Countries listed above have flight-capable craft, just not very good ones. China still scares us.

On American reverse engineering efforts:

Q: Have we created our own craft?

A: Modifying them to fire human weapons is a big thing. Generally trying to test and research ways to reduce inertia. Yes, we've taken them out of atmosphere a lot.

Commercial applications have already filtered into everyday life:

Q: Is tech from these craft used commercially?

A: A lot of your stealth aircraft sport smoother designs. Learning to track them helped with targeting software. Laser technology comes to mind since it's a crippled version of what they use. Lasers, you see lasers everywhere even in retail.

The poster implied Lockheed Martin's involvement with characteristic sarcasm:

Q: Is Lockheed Martin involved?

A: Such a great company, aren't they? Definitely wouldn't be the type to try to leak things to the public.

Mining Operations

A consistent thread throughout the discussion: these beings mine Earth's resources.

Q: What are they mining?

A: They consistently mine gold. The last miner we looked at had a huge haul of gold, iron and silver. No dirt. Mining quite literally takes the resource out of the rock without leaving much dirt.

This mining operation provides a pragmatic answer to the “why are they here?” question that avoids both the messianic (they're here to save us) and the paranoid (they're here to harvest us). They're simply extracting resources while maintaining the planet's habitability. Zookeepers ensuring the enclosure remains functional.

2002: The Year Everything Changed

When asked about significant years, the whistleblower repeatedly emphasized 2002:

Q: Why was 2002 a big year?

A: A lot of activities and changes in operation both for them and us. A lot of secrecy issues surfaced that year as a result. Funding also jumped through the roof.

When pressed for specifics, they mentioned the Eric Davis memo (the alleged Wilson-Davis documents) and suggested the third page's date was “interesting.”

For UFO researchers, 2002 sits in an odd gap, after the initial post-9/11 chaos but before the modern UAP disclosure movement. What happened that year to cause such upheaval remains unexplained, but the whistleblower clearly considered it pivotal.

Nuclear Concerns

The beings' relationship with nuclear weapons emerged as a major theme:

Q: Has any form of communication been established?

A: Yes. They mostly want very little to do with us until we start to talk about war and nuclear options. It's one of the reasons why you see them so often at critical events. It's hard to get them to respond to us in general.

Q: Does this happen often with nukes?

A: About once every 10 years for the US. A higher-up joked months after the last one I saw that “The phone rings everywhere but the president's office.”

When asked why they didn't prevent Hiroshima and Nagasaki:

Q: If they interfere when there is a nuclear threat why didn't they prevent the WW2 nukes?

A: We never came to a solid conclusion other than they may not have realized our capability until we used them. They were interested in test sites but never actually stopped the ones we set off.

On their apparent objectives:

Q: What's their objective?

A: I agree they are here to observe and preserve. The idea was pitched that they are waiting for us to mature or perhaps something bigger to arrive and they don't want us to ruin the planet in the meantime.

Q: Why don't they just destroy us?

A: They could absolutely destroy us if they wanted to. They have started launch sequences before that we suspect were tests on “what they are dealing with.” My personal view is they have to stay out of our way but keep us from destroying ourselves.

The Interface Technology

One of the more science-fiction elements: the beings' computer technology.

Q: Are they aware of computer tech?

A: They know about ours yes. I doubt they could operate ours with our input devices though. Describing their version of a console/computer is really hard. It works by holding it and thinking about what you want. If you are distracted even slightly it goes to shit.

This thought-controlled interface suggests a level of technology that operates on principles entirely foreign to human computing, more akin to telepathy than programming.

Personal Revelations

Throughout both threads, the whistleblower shared personal details that either humanized them or (depending on your perspective) added to an elaborate character construction.

On motivation:

Q: Why are you doing this?

A: Yes, liver cancer sucks. I'm not going on national TV or radio. I'm on a 4chan board. Cancer makes you feel a little different.

On faith:

Q: Do you still believe in God?

A: Absolutely not.

On whether we might be their creation:

Q: Do you think we are their creation/experiment?

A: We both look very similar. It wouldn't surprise me and I'm inclined to think so.

On the dead man's switch:

Q: Is there a dead man's switch?

A: There is a lockbox that I've asked to be opened after my death. Hopefully part of that makes it to this board as I've instructed.

And in one of the thread's most human moments:

“It has a weird way of making you appreciate everything. I actually taste the water I drink now if that even makes sense. Appreciate it though, I'm pretty fucked.”

What They Wouldn't Answer

Equally telling is what the whistleblower refused to discuss:

• Specific department name
• Their educational background
• Facility locations
• Detailed reporting structure
• The Varginha, Brazil incident (“seems far out there”)
• Antarctica connections (mentioned briefly, then avoided)
• Highly specific technical questions (accused questioners of “samefagging”)

These omissions could indicate operational security concerns, holes in an invented story, or simple unfamiliarity with topics outside their claimed expertise.

Assessment: LARP or Leak?

Any honest analysis must acknowledge we cannot verify these claims. Anonymous posts on 4chan carry zero inherent credibility. The forum is famous for elaborate hoaxes, and “insider knowledge” threads appear regularly.

However, several elements distinguish this particular posting:

Factors suggesting authenticity:

• Unusual internal consistency across hundreds of questions
• Details that align with other alleged disclosures (Element 115, gravity propulsion, Gray descriptions)
• Pragmatic, almost boring explanations rather than sensationalist claims
• Acknowledged limitations of knowledge rather than claiming omniscience
• Willingness to say “I don't know” frequently
• Emotional elements (cancer, marriage strain) that humanize without melodrama
• Specific operational details about crash recovery protocols
• The “zookeeper” framing, original and consistent throughout

Factors suggesting fabrication:

• Anonymous forum with no verification possible
• Convenient inability to provide proof “yet”
• Some answers feel evasive or circular
• Terminal illness creates urgency that explains lack of documentation
• Sophisticated LARP creators can maintain consistency
• No subsequent verification of the “lockbox” claim

The threads are best understood as highly detailed modern UFO folklore. They may contain truth, distortion, deliberate disinformation, pure invention, or all of the above, mixed together in a way no one can untangle from the outside.

Why This Whistleblower Sticks

Despite the lack of proof, the 2023 4chan whistleblower has stuck in the collective UFO conversation for a few reasons:

1. It is comprehensive. It offers a full “model of reality”: drones, factories, grays, mining, nuclear oversight, reverse engineering, and geopolitical angles.

2. It meshes with existing lore. Element 115, gray aliens, UFOs around nukes, deep ocean mysteries, and a government above the Air Force all slot neatly into familiar narratives.

3. It feels grounded but not polished. The tone is closer to a tired coworker venting than a media-trained witness. That informality makes it feel more authentic to some readers.

4. The human angle lands. A dying insider dropping secrets to a dying imageboard has a certain grim symmetry, whether you believe him or not.

The Bigger Picture

Regardless of authenticity, these threads articulate a coherent worldview that differs from mainstream UFO mythology in important ways:

1. Industrial rather than mystical. No spiritual evolution, no galactic councils. Just manufacturing, mining, and monitoring.

2. Indifferent rather than interested. These beings aren't here to help humanity ascend or harvest our souls. They're maintaining an asset (Earth) and its resources (including us, perhaps).

3. Pragmatic rather than paranoid. Government secrecy isn't about preventing panic or protecting power. It's simply about managing something they don't fully understand while preventing adversaries from gaining advantages.

4. Continuous rather than episodic. Not crashed saucers from distant stars making occasional visits, but a permanent, industrial presence operating for centuries.

This framework feels almost disappointingly mundane, which may be precisely why some find it credible. The truth, if this is it, isn't dramatic. It's just... ongoing.

Where Are They Now?

The whistleblower stopped posting after approximately two weeks, citing the toll of chemotherapy and frustration with off-topic responses. They left with a promise: the lockbox, instructions, and potential future proof.

As of this writing, no such follow-up has emerged. Whether that means the poster survived longer than expected, decided against disclosure, was fabricating from the start, or simply hasn't died yet, we cannot know.

What remains is this: two archived threads, hundreds of questions, and one of the most detailed accounts of alleged UFO program involvement ever posted online. Too detailed to ignore, too unsupported to accept outright. Whether they eventually look like early disclosure, an elaborate roleplay, or something stranger, they have already done their work, reshaping how many people on the internet imagine the UFO problem.

Read the Original Threads

For those wanting to examine the primary sources:

• Thread 1 – April 24, 2023
• Thread 2 – May 4, 2023

---

What do you think? Genuine insider or elaborate larp?

Matthew 2 is not just a continuation of the Christmas story. It is not simply a chapter about wise men, a star, and a wicked king.

Matthew 2 is a revelation of what happens when heaven interrupts earth… when God’s plan advances… and when darkness realizes it is about to lose.

Every time God moves, two things occur at once:

Heaven opens. Hell panics.

And Matthew chapter 2 shows both realities playing out in real time.

This chapter is electric. It is prophetic. It is spiritually charged. And it contains some of the deepest lessons you and I need in this exact moment of our lives.

Because Matthew 2 is the story of what happens after God gives a promise.

It is the story of:

What tries to stop you. What tries to mislead you. What tries to intimidate you. And how God leads you through dangers you don’t even see.

It is the story of the battle over your destiny.

So today, we walk through Matthew 2 as a legacy reminder of how God protects, guides, speaks, warns, redirects, covers, shields, and fulfills His word in your life—even when the enemy is moving pieces behind the scenes to destroy the very thing God just began.

Let’s go slowly. Let’s go deeply. Let’s go with eyes wide open.

Because Matthew 2 is your story too.

──────────────────────────────────────── ────────────────────────────────────────

THE WISE MEN: WHEN GOD DRAWS PEOPLE FROM FAR AWAY TO FULFILL A PROPHECY

One of the most fascinating parts of Matthew 2 is that God does not start with religious leaders, priests, scribes, or people who “should” have recognized the signs.

He starts with Gentiles. Outsiders. Foreign astrologers. Men who didn’t grow up with the Scriptures.

Why?

Because God is not restricted by human expectations. He pulls people from anywhere, anytime, and any background to accomplish His purpose.

And sometimes the people closest to the truth refuse to see it… while the people farthest away humble themselves and follow the light God gives them.

These wise men—whatever their exact identities—were men who saw a sign and responded. And this is where legacy faith begins:

They moved at the first direction of God.

Consider that. God gave them only one piece of instruction: a star.

Not a map. Not an address. Not a Google pin. Not even a confirmation that they were interpreting it correctly.

Just a star.

And they followed.

This is what obedience looks like before the miracle. Not certainty. Not clarity. Not perfect understanding. Just obedience.

How many blessings in our lives have been delayed because we waited for every detail instead of following the single light God provided?

Matthew 2 teaches that God leads us in stages:

A star before the journey. A word before the direction. A warning before the danger. A dream before the next step.

God doesn’t reveal the whole story—because we would try to control it.

He reveals enough to move us.

The wise men traveled through deserts, terrains, kingdoms, and obstacles to worship a newborn King. Their persistence shows us something important:

When God calls you into something, there will be obstacles… but obstacles do not cancel the assignment.

Obedience is the bridge that carries you forward when the path isn’t easy.

──────────────────────────────────────── ────────────────────────────────────────

HEROD: THE SPIRIT OF OPPOSITION THAT ALWAYS AWAKENS WHEN DESTINY IS NEAR

As soon as the wise men ask, “Where is the one who has been born king of the Jews?”, the Scripture tells us:

Herod was disturbed—and all Jerusalem with him.

This is the moment spiritual warfare enters the narrative.

Because when Jesus shows up, false kings panic.

Herod’s throne wasn’t built on truth—it was built on insecurity, politics, paranoia, and fear. So when real authority appears, fake authority trembles.

And this is true in your life as well:

Every time God brings you closer to your purpose, something insecure will rise up in opposition.

Opposition is not a sign that you’re off track. Opposition is a sign that you’re carrying something that threatens the enemy.

Herod represents the spirit that tries to:

Manipulate you. Mislead you. Monitor you. Destroy you.

He pretends to honor the mission of God while planning to kill it.

That spirit still operates today. It will appear as support but secretly undermine you. It will appear as encouragement but secretly resent you. It will appear as interest but secretly track you.

Herod tells the wise men, “Go and search carefully… then report back to me.”

But spiritual discernment protects them from falling for the trap.

And spiritual discernment protects you too.

Every time you get closer to Jesus— You will need discernment to recognize who is truly with you and who is simply curious about your journey.

Not everyone who asks questions deserves answers.

Not everyone who acts interested deserves access.

Not everyone who smiles is safe.

Matthew 2 shows us that wisdom begins with worship… and continues with discernment.

──────────────────────────────────────── ────────────────────────────────────────

THE STAR RETURNS: GOD CONFIRMS WHAT HE STARTED

After Herod sends them out, the wise men leave, and the text says something breathtaking:

The star they had seen in the east went ahead of them.

This means the light disappeared for a season.

They saw it originally. They followed it. They obeyed it. Then it vanished.

And this is exactly how many believers feel:

“God, I stepped out… I followed You… I obeyed what You told me… but now the light is gone… and I don’t know where to go from here.”

But Matthew 2 answers that fear with a simple truth:

When you keep moving in obedience, the light returns.

The star reappeared only after they kept going.

The revelation is this:

God confirms direction for movers, not sitters.

He leads those who walk. He speaks to those who seek. He reveals next steps to those who refuse to stop at the last instruction.

The star stood still over the house, meaning God guides with precision, not guesswork.

And when they found Jesus, they did not worship the star—they worshiped the Savior.

Never mistake the sign for the source. Never worship the guidance more than the God who gave it. Never cling to the method—cling to the Messiah.

──────────────────────────────────────── ────────────────────────────────────────

THE GIFTS: PROPHETIC PROVISION BEFORE THE STORM

Gold. Frankincense. Myrrh.

These were not random gifts. They were prophetic symbols and financial provision.

Gold fit for a King. Frankincense fit for worship. Myrrh fit for burial.

This means that the wise men’s worship contained a prophetic sermon:

Jesus is King. Jesus is God. Jesus was born to die.

But here’s the part many believers miss:

These gifts funded the escape to Egypt.

God provided for the future before the danger arrived.

God sent provision before the attack. God sent resources before the need. God sent supply before the crisis.

This is how He works.

Some blessings in your life were not meant for the moment you received them—they were meant for the battles you couldn’t see yet.

Sometimes God gives you extra strength, extra help, extra finances, extra clarity, extra favor—and you wonder why.

Because He sees Herod before you do. He sees the threat before you sense it. He knows the escape you’re going to need long before you realize you're in danger.

Matthew 2 teaches this powerful truth:

Provision often arrives dressed as worship.

──────────────────────────────────────── ────────────────────────────────────────

THE WARNING: GOD SPEAKS IN MOMENTS OF GREAT DANGER

After the wise men worship, Scripture says:

Having been warned in a dream not to go back to Herod, they returned to their country by another route.

This is one of the most important spiritual insights in Matthew 2:

When the enemy is plotting against you, God warns you quietly.

He doesn’t always send the warning through thunder, lightning, earthquakes, or dramatic miracles.

Sometimes He simply disrupts your peace. Sometimes He whispers in your spirit. Sometimes He shifts your path in ways you didn't plan. Sometimes He closes a door that you desperately wanted open.

What you call disappointment may actually be divine protection.

What you call confusion may actually be rerouting.

What you call delay may be God preventing you from returning to a Herod that looks friendly but intends to kill you.

Every believer needs to learn this:

When God says “Go another way,” don’t argue—go.

Your survival is in His instruction. Your protection is in His timing. Your future is in His rerouting.

──────────────────────────────────────── ────────────────────────────────────────

JOSEPH: A MAN WHO SAVES JESUS BY LISTENING IMMEDIATELY

One of the greatest models of spiritual leadership in Scripture is Joseph—not because he preached… not because he performed miracles… not because he wrote books… but because he obeyed without hesitation.

An angel says, “Get up. Take the child. Go to Egypt.”

Joseph gets up that night and goes.

Most people would wait until morning. Many would ask questions. Some would hesitate. Some would need confirmation. Some would need a fleece, a sign, a second sign, and an opinion from two friends and a pastor.

Joseph packed in the dark.

This is what protecting destiny looks like.

This is what fatherhood looks like. This is what leadership looks like. This is what obedience looks like.

Not delayed obedience. Immediate obedience.

There are moments in your life where hesitation is dangerous. Delayed obedience becomes disobedience. And slow movement becomes an open door for the enemy.

Joseph shows us what it means to guard the presence of God in your home:

He listened. He acted. He moved.

Some of the greatest victories of your life will come not from what you say—but from how quickly you obey.

──────────────────────────────────────── ────────────────────────────────────────

EGYPT: THE PLACE YOU NEVER WANTED TO GO BUT GOD SENDS YOU ANYWAY

Imagine how strange this must have felt:

The Messiah—Israel’s promised King—being sent to Egypt, the land of Israel’s former slavery.

But God does this on purpose. Because God redeems every story He touches.

He brings His Son into the very place where His people once suffered. He turns the land of past bondage into a land of present protection.

This is the breathtaking wisdom of God:

The place the enemy used to break you becomes the place God uses to shield you.

The place that once hurt you becomes the place where healing begins.

The place that once represented trauma becomes the place that represents deliverance.

God wastes nothing.

Your Egypt may not be a geographical location. It may be a season you didn’t want, a job you didn’t choose, a challenge that wasn’t on your schedule, or a circumstance that forced you to trust God more deeply.

But here is the beauty of Matthew 2:

Your Egypt is temporary—but necessary.

Herod is temporary—but dangerous. The journey is temporary—but transformational. The escape is temporary—but life-saving.

God sends you into Egypt only long enough to protect what He planted inside you.

And once the danger has passed, He brings you home.

──────────────────────────────────────── ────────────────────────────────────────

HEROD’S RAGE: THE COST OF BEING A THREAT TO DARKNESS

When Herod realizes he has been outwitted, Scripture says he became furious.

Why?

Because darkness always panics when it cannot stop the move of God.

Herod then orders the massacre of innocent children. This is one of the most heartbreaking passages in all of Scripture.

But it reveals the pattern of spiritual warfare:

When the enemy cannot find the blessing, he tries to destroy everything around it. When he cannot stop the promise, he tries to create collateral damage. When he cannot block God’s plan, he increases intimidation.

But Herod’s rage only fulfills prophecy—not destiny.

The enemy can cause pain, but he cannot rewrite God’s plan.

And this is where Matthew 2 gives you strength:

If hell cannot stop Jesus as a newborn child, then hell cannot stop what God is doing in your life now.

──────────────────────────────────────── ────────────────────────────────────────

RETURNING HOME: GOD BRINGS YOU BACK DIFFERENT THAN WHEN YOU LEFT

After Herod dies, an angel appears again to Joseph in a dream:

“Go back. The ones who wanted to kill the child are dead.”

Victory doesn’t always come loudly. Sometimes the threat simply loses its power. Sometimes the enemy simply runs out of time. Sometimes God removes the obstacle without you even seeing it happen.

God brings Joseph, Mary, and Jesus back to Israel— but not to Bethlehem. To Nazareth.

Why?

Because the safest place for someone with a divine calling is not the place that looks prestigious— it is the place God chooses.

Nazareth was small, unimpressive, looked down upon, and considered insignificant.

And yet, it became the home of the Savior.

This teaches an important truth:

God hides greatness in places people overlook.

He places the extraordinary inside the ordinary. He plants world-changing purpose inside unremarkable settings.

If your life feels small, unseen, or overlooked— you are exactly where God does His greatest work.

──────────────────────────────────────── ────────────────────────────────────────

THE LEGACY MESSAGE OF MATTHEW 2

Matthew 2 is not just a chapter in the Christmas story. It is a blueprint for your spiritual journey.

You see:

Like the wise men, you are being guided. Like Joseph, you are being warned and protected. Like Jesus, your destiny is being fought over. Like Mary, you are carrying something heaven gave you. Like Israel, you are being called out of Egypt. Like Nazareth, your humble beginnings will not prevent God’s greatest work.

Matthew 2 reveals seven timeless truths:

1. God leads before He explains.

2. Obedience is the doorway to revelation.

3. Opposition increases near destiny.

4. Provision often comes before the crisis.

5. God warns His people of hidden danger.

6. Temporary detours protect eternal assignments.

7. God fulfills every promise He speaks.

Your life is not random. Your journey is not chaotic. Your battles are not meaningless. Your reroutes are not mistakes.

Every step is guided. Every threat is seen. Every danger is accounted for. Every provision is intentional. Every prophecy is unfolding.

And Matthew 2 is heaven’s reminder:

Nothing can stop a move of God that begins with Jesus.

Not Herod. Not fear. Not opposition. Not circumstances. Not danger. Not evil.

What God sets in motion, hell cannot undo.

And the same is true for you.

Watch Douglas Vandergraph’s inspiring faith-based videos on YouTube

Support the ministry by buying Douglas a coffee

Douglas Vandergraph

#faith #Jesus #BibleStudy #ChristianInspiration #Hope #Encouragement #Matthew2 #Purpose #SpiritualGrowth #GodIsWithYou

GO HOOSIERS!

Tonight I have an NCAA women's basketball game to follow. The Western Michigan Broncos will come down to Bloomington's Assembly Hall to play the Indiana Hoosiers. Opening tip is scheduled for 17:00 local time. I've already tuned into The Home for IU Women's Basketball where I intend to follow the radio call of the game.

And the adventure does continue.

Sometimes the most powerful moments in Scripture are the ones we rush past. Matthew 1 is one of those chapters people skim, skip, or slide over because they think it’s “just a genealogy.” A long list of names. A family tree. A chapter that seems more like an ancestry website than a divine revelation. Yet when you slow down long enough to breathe it in, you realize Matthew 1 is not a list of names…

It is the blueprint of redemption.

It is the evidence that God never improvises.

It is the reminder that heaven writes history with precision, intentionality, mercy, and unshakeable promise.

It is the announcement that Jesus Christ did not appear out of nowhere—He arrived through the wreckage and the beauty of real human lives, real brokenness, and real grace.

Matthew 1 is not the beginning of Jesus’ story.

It is the revelation that His story began long before the world noticed Him.

This chapter invites us into the quiet, holy realization that God was already working on your story long before anyone believed He was paying attention.

And that truth alone can set someone free today.

---

THE GENEALOGY IS NOT BORING — IT IS PROOF THAT GOD NEVER GIVES UP ON ANYONE

Matthew opens his Gospel like a lawyer presenting evidence. He lays out a record—an unbroken line of generations—because he wants readers to know two things:

1. Jesus is the fulfillment of every promise God ever made, and

2. God intentionally worked through imperfect people to bring the perfect Savior into the world.

This is why the genealogy matters. It is God saying:

“I know exactly what I’m doing.”

Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, David—names that echo throughout Scripture. But Matthew doesn’t stop there. He doesn’t sanitize the list or bleach out the scandals. He includes the names people would rather forget.

Because grace lives in the places we try to hide.

Look at the stories embedded in this genealogy:

• Tamar — a woman whose story is filled with dysfunction, loss, and a moment of desperation. • Rahab — a prostitute who chose faith over fear. • Ruth — a Moabite widow who had every reason to quit but refused to let go of hope. • Bathsheba — a woman pulled into a king’s sin and swept into God’s redemption.

What kind of God writes a story like this?

A God who is not ashamed of your past.

A God who is not intimidated by your mistakes.

A God who doesn’t choose people based on résumé but on willingness.

A God who transforms the unqualified into the undeniable.

A God who builds a lineage of salvation not out of flawless saints but out of bruised, hurting, real human beings—people who had been through things, carried things, survived things, and still kept moving.

The genealogy is the announcement that Jesus came through brokenness so He could redeem brokenness.

If God can weave together the lives in Matthew 1 into the birth of the Messiah, what makes you think He can’t take the pieces of your life and produce something extraordinary?

God has never needed perfection—He only needs surrender.

---

THE HIDDEN MESSAGE OF MATTHEW 1: GRACE IS ALWAYS WORKING BEHIND THE SCENES

Every generation listed in Matthew 1 carries its own story, its own failures, its own miracles. And yet Matthew groups them into three sets of fourteen generations—not because he is trying to be poetic, but because he wants to show something deeper:

Nothing in your life is ever random. God organizes what you think is chaotic.

When Matthew organizes the genealogy into these three movements—Abraham to David, David to exile, exile to Christ—he reveals the rhythm of God’s work:

• Promise • Pain • Restoration

That rhythm appears again and again in our own lives.

There is the moment God speaks something over you.

Then comes the season where you are stretched, tested, pushed, and sometimes wounded.

And then comes the restoration, where God fulfills the promise in a way that brings Him glory and transforms you into someone you never imagined you could become.

Matthew is telling you that your pain doesn’t cancel your promise. It prepares you for your restoration.

God never wastes a season—not even the ones you wish had never happened.

---

WHY JESUS’ FAMILY LINE MATTERS TODAY

If God had wanted, He could have sent Jesus into the world with trumpets, angels, and blinding glory. But instead He sent Him through a family line filled with people who were:

• Broken • Flawed • Rumored about • Looked down on • Undervalued • Imperfect • Human

Why?

Because Jesus didn’t come for the polished. He came for the desperate. He came for the overlooked. He came for the people who feel like their story is too messy, their past too complicated, their history too heavy.

Matthew 1 screams a truth the enemy hopes you never see:

You are not disqualified from being used by God.

If anything, your story makes you a candidate.

Your scars make you relatable.

Your tears make your compassion real.

Your failures make your faith credible.

Your redemption makes your message unstoppable.

Jesus came from a line of people God redeemed. And now Jesus comes to redeem your line.

This is not just ancestry.

This is prophecy.

This is purpose.

This is God whispering over your life, “I can work with this.”

---

THE BIRTH OF JESUS: GOD STEPPING INTO HUMANITY IN THE MOST HUMBLE WAY POSSIBLE

Matthew transitions from the genealogy into the moment that changed history:

“Now the birth of Jesus Christ took place in this way…”

And just like the genealogy, the birth is not wrapped in glamour—it's wrapped in humility.

Mary is young. Joseph is misunderstood. The situation is scandalous. The timing is inconvenient. The world is unprepared. The location is simple. The circumstances are quiet. And yet the miracle is unstoppable.

This is the pattern of God:

He does His greatest work in the places people overlook.

The Savior of the world enters quietly, not violently. He arrives in vulnerability, not dominance. He steps into human limitation, not human acclaim.

Why?

Because the kingdom of God does not come the way kingdoms of men do.

The world celebrates power.

God celebrates obedience.

The world celebrates status.

God celebrates surrender.

The world celebrates prestige.

God celebrates purity of heart.

Everything about Matthew 1 reveals the heart of heaven: God chooses what the world ignores and lifts up what the world tramples on.

---

JOSEPH — THE MAN WHO OBEYED GOD WHEN IT COST HIM EVERYTHING

Many people read Matthew 1 and focus solely on Mary, but Joseph’s obedience is a theological earthquake.

Think about his position:

He is betrothed to Mary, meaning they are legally bound even though the marriage has not yet been finalized.

Suddenly, she is pregnant.

And Joseph knows it is not his child.

In that culture, this situation could destroy his reputation, his dignity, his future, and her life.

Joseph is described as “a just man,” meaning he wants to do what is right. But being just in Scripture doesn’t simply mean “following the rules.” It means aligning your heart with God’s heart. So Joseph decides to break off the engagement quietly—not to protect himself, but to protect Mary.

Then heaven steps in.

An angel appears to him and says:

“Joseph, son of David, do not be afraid…”

And with those words, God reaches into Joseph’s fear, insecurity, confusion, and heartbreak, and gives him purpose:

“Take Mary as your wife… for what is conceived in her is from the Holy Spirit.”

Joseph had a choice.

He could obey God and lose his reputation.

Or disobey God and keep the approval of people.

He chose obedience.

He chose purpose over perception.

He chose calling over comfort.

He chose faith over fear.

Joseph teaches us that the obedience that costs you the most often leads to the greatest move of God in your life.

Your calling will not always make sense. Your instructions from God will not always impress anyone else. Your obedience may confuse people. It may provoke judgment. It may cost you relationships. It may invite criticism.

But obedience always leads you closer to the heart of Christ.

---

THE MIRACLE OF EMMANUEL — GOD WITH US

Matthew quotes the prophecy from Isaiah:

“Behold, the virgin shall conceive and bear a son, and they shall call his name Emmanuel,” which means “God with us.”

This is not poetic language. This is not symbolic language. This is literal, world-changing truth:

God came near.

Not as a vision. Not as an idea. Not as a distant deity. Not as a concept to be debated.

But as a person.

Jesus is the touch of God. Jesus is the voice of God. Jesus is the presence of God. Jesus is the nearness of God.

“God with us” means you are never abandoned. “God with us” means heaven stepped into your struggle. “God with us” means you are never unseen. “God with us” means every battle is fought with divine strength on your side. “God with us” means you never walk alone—ever.

Emmanuel is not an idea. Emmanuel is a promise. A presence. A person.

And He has never left your side.

---

MATTHEW 1 TEACHES THREE LIFE-CHANGING TRUTHS YOU CANNOT MISS

1. Your past does not disqualify you.

Jesus came from a lineage filled with grace. That means your lineage, your story, your past, your missteps, your tears—none of it can stop God from doing something extraordinary in your life.

2. Obedience creates miracles.

Joseph obeyed quietly, faithfully, humbly. And through his obedience, the Savior of the world was protected and raised.

Obedience is not glamorous. Obedience is not loud. But obedience is always powerful.

3. God is with you—literally with you.

Emmanuel is the banner over Matthew 1. God stepping into the human condition. God entering the timeline of humanity. God becoming touchable, reachable, and knowable.

If Matthew 1 tells you anything, it’s this:

God keeps His word. God fulfills His promises. God finishes what He starts. God works through imperfect people to bring about perfect redemption.

And if He did it then, He will do it now.

---

THE LEGACY OF MATTHEW 1 — GOD CAN WRITE A NEW BEGINNING FOR YOU

Matthew 1 is not just genealogy. It is not just narrative. It is not just historical context.

It is proof that God is a generational architect.

He is not just working in your life—He is working through your life into future generations.

He is shaping your children’s spiritual inheritance. He is writing redemption into your family line. He is bending broken branches back toward healing.

Some people think God writes stories chapter by chapter. Matthew 1 reveals that He writes them generation by generation.

You are part of a bigger story than you realize. Your obedience today becomes someone else’s testimony tomorrow. Your surrender today becomes someone else’s freedom tomorrow. Your faith today becomes someone else’s foundation tomorrow.

Matthew 1 is a reminder that even if your beginning was messy, God is capable of giving you a holy ending.

And if you are willing—if you surrender your life, your pain, your decisions, your past, your future—God can take your story and weave it into something that carries His fingerprints far beyond your lifetime.

You are not too late. You are not too broken. You are not too far gone. You are not forgotten. You are not overlooked.

If Matthew 1 proves anything, it is that God can redeem anything.

Your family line is not bound by your past. Your story is not limited by your mistakes. Your future is not determined by what others think of you.

Matthew 1 is the announcement that Jesus enters through the unexpected—and He still does today.

Let this chapter speak over your life:

“You are part of a divine story, and God is still writing.”

---

CONCLUSION — THE BEGINNING OF JESUS IS THE BEGINNING OF YOUR HOPE

Matthew 1 is the doorway into the Gospel, and it opens with a message that has the power to restore any heart:

God finishes what He starts.

He finished His promise to Abraham. He finished His covenant with David. He finished the long centuries of waiting. He finished the plan of redemption He spoke through the prophets. And through Jesus—He finished the distance between heaven and humanity.

There is nothing in your life too broken for God to redeem. Nothing too old for God to renew. Nothing too wounded for God to heal. Nothing too chaotic for God to organize.

The same God who handcrafted every generation that led to Jesus is the same God who is shaping every chapter that leads to your destiny.

Your life is not random. Your story is not meaningless. Your beginning does not define your ending.

If Matthew 1 teaches you anything, it is this:

God has been working on your story long before you realized you were part of His plan.

And He will not stop now.

---

Watch Douglas Vandergraph’s inspiring faith-based videos on YouTube

Support the ministry by buying Douglas a coffee

— Douglas Vandergraph

#Jesus #BibleStudy #Faith #ChristianInspiration #GospelOfMatthew #Hope #Encouragement #DailyFaith #SpiritualGrowth #WalkWithGod

Here will be horse racing

test test test

Our Father Who art in heaven Hallowed be Thy name Thy Kingdom come Thy will be done on Earth as it is in heaven Give us this day our daily Bread And forgive us our trespasses As we forgive those who trespass against us And lead us not into temptation But deliver us from evil

Amen

Jesus is Lord! Come Lord Jesus!

Come Lord Jesus! Christ is Lord!

Raise The Sun

I am capital worth and growing Six times the debt of a Moroccan day An effortless one Dedication in life Strange minds are collectively dean of courage Ossler on the slopes And evening sound of vestigial eyes Fortunes for tar Impromptu battles for the dream In any year, I am you The apostles will carry your burdens of day Over the reaches of any sum The pestilence is no longer We are the past And we are the telephone Now is worth the wait Hello.

📱

Plus and a Half

For distant seeking of all of these seeds These peptides, these rulers, The Sun We are expected to be the smallest And half paid But the vertigo of one person Is anathema

For minutes to soak up the Sun, I am minutes to one person, and one half, and one Sun

Ecstasy in view And the blinds we paid for I am hand-picked, and laying, best for later

To be images of the Sun, and languishing, To be early-led, and the landscape, I use imminent draw And feel poorly when in power, And I am no-one, but the Sun

Fri-5-DK 🇩🇰

To the copy of a day Spilling Dan to the bed and Thornton when It speaks to eleven, the board of the unredeemed Too many errors of that, The interconvertible and conscience Possibly Euro posting to explain The weary hand of just one tithe, one person; one problem To be past Pearson and the Emory dew Explaining the impath, soreness in veil Fortunes to forget Nothing to be on a Scotland Day Nosing by Summer and earnest Norway Packages of cloth and bits of scare-paper Worthy London is eager to amend- All faith is equal, says empathy Lightning redemption in Christ is yours

A continuación se presenta un resumen de la declaración emitida por diversas organizaciones latinoamericanas que se centran en la intersección entre la tecnología y el medio ambiente, y que participaron en la reciente COP celebrada en Belém, Brasil. La versión completa de la declaración se puede consultar aquí.

Aunque la inteligencia artificial (IA) ya se había tenido en cuenta en COP anteriores, la COP30, celebrada en Belém (Brasil) en noviembre de 2025, marcó una significativa nueva fase en los debates sobre el clima. Por primera vez, la IA se incluyó sistemáticamente en la Agenda de Acción de la COP como tema estratégico.

Sin embargo, a pesar del gran entusiasmo que suscitó en la COP30 la promesa de la IA de ayudar a combatir el cambio climático, se prestó muy poca atención a la otra cara del ecosistema de la IA: su impacto medioambiental. Solo unos pocos eventos paralelos y conferencias de prensa llamaron la atención sobre cómo los modelos de IA y las infraestructuras que los alimentan son responsables de emitir altos niveles de CO₂ a la atmósfera y también han provocado un aumento de la demanda de minerales, agua y energía.

Al término de la COP30 y en el contexto de los debates políticos que deben seguir desarrollándose en futuras ediciones de la COP, queremos expresar las siguientes preocupaciones en relación con el discurso público sobre la IA en el contexto de la crisis climática y ecológica:

1. La inteligencia artificial no es una solución tecnológica a la crisis climática y ecológica; es más, la IA aumenta el uso de combustibles fósiles, eleva las emisiones de gases de efecto invernadero y, por lo tanto, pone en peligro los objetivos climáticos de los países con mayor concentración de centros de datos de IA, como China, Estados Unidos y la Unión Europea. Las políticas climáticas de la COP no pueden basarse en el discurso de marketing, el cabildeo o el pensamiento mágico promovido por las empresas tecnológicas, sino en las pruebas científicas independientes actuales.

2. La inteligencia artificial no es solo otro recurso natural o una fuerza inevitable. Su uso, adopción y comercialización en todos los aspectos de la vida política, social y económica está impulsado por sus propietarios, un puñado de grandes y poderosas empresas tecnológicas (concentradas principalmente en dos países, Estados Unidos y China) cuyo incentivo es expandir su capital, no mitigar la crisis climática y ecológica. Las políticas climáticas de la COP no pueden diseñarse para servir al bienestar económico de este puñado de poderosas empresas: esto fomenta la concentración de poder y refuerza peligrosamente su papel, especialmente en otros países de bajos ingresos y en desarrollo.

3. La IA genera impactos socioambientales que van mucho más allá de las emisiones de CO₂. Como muestran múltiples informes internacionales basados en pruebas científicas, la IA es una industria que requiere numerosos minerales, grandes cantidades de tierra y enormes cantidades de agua dulce y energía, lo que está causando una serie de impactos socioambientales en todo el mundo que van más allá de las emisiones de CO₂ de alcance 1, y que también exigen una contabilidad seria del alcance 3, la categoría que expone los impactos del ciclo de vida completo en la minería, las cadenas de suministro, la fabricación y el fin de la vida útil. Sin embargo, los resultados de la COP30 no incorporaron de manera significativa estos impactos, lo que dejó una gran brecha en la forma en que los países evalúan y reportan la huella climática de la infraestructura digital. De cara al futuro, es esencial que los compromisos climáticos nacionales (Contribuciones Determinadas a Nivel Nacional, NDC) incluyan explícitamente las emisiones y el uso de recursos asociados con los centros de datos y las cadenas de suministro de IA, garantizando la transparencia y la rendición de cuentas en un sector cuyo impacto climático se está expandiendo rápidamente. Nos preocupa que los responsables de la toma de decisiones crean que estos impactos pueden resolverse milagrosamente solo con la innovación tecnológica, lo que la evidencia descarta, por ejemplo, dada la paradoja de Jevons en la IA.

4. El apetito energético de la IA amenaza una transición energética justa. Como una de las industrias más intensivas en energía del siglo XXI, el interés genuino de las empresas que están detrás de la IA en la COP es garantizar el acceso a los combustibles fósiles a corto plazo y a las energías renovables a medio plazo, considerándose estas últimas una solución tecnológica a sus emisiones de CO₂, ignorando los costes sociales, económicos y medioambientales que conlleva actualmente la producción de energía renovable, especialmente en comunidades que no han causado la crisis climática y ecológica. El apetito de la IA por las energías renovables es tal que, sin una mediación política y democrática, denunciamos que la transición energética, especialmente en los países en desarrollo, se diseñará para satisfacer las necesidades de un puñado de empresas tecnológicas extranjeras en lugar de las comunidades e industrias locales.

5. Los gobiernos deben proteger a su población y a sus ecosistemas, no los intereses de la industria. Instamos a los responsables de la toma de decisiones en los gobiernos nacionales, en particular en los países en desarrollo que participan en la COP, a que reafirmen su compromiso con las pruebas científicas y el bienestar de sus comunidades, la biodiversidad y las industrias locales. Es esencial no adoptar la IA de forma acrítica. Nos encontramos en un momento crítico para abordar la crisis climática y ecológica, y cualquier mejora de la IA sin los debidos controles normativos, socioambientales y éticos, sólo reforzará el poder de las empresas tecnológicas mundiales, lo que en última instancia socavará las ambiciones climáticas en todo el mundo.

Firmado por:

• El Instituto Lationoamerica de Terraformación
• Law and Technology Research Institute of Recife (IP.rec)
• Coding Rights
• Laboratory of Public Policy and Internet – LAPIN
• Brazilian Institute for Consumer Protection – Idec
• Heinrich Böll Foundation

#Español

---

下面是中文的文本。

Note: English below.

Pet časova auto-škole za serigrafiju A3 formata.

Vikend čuvanja bake u zamenu za video-instalaciju.

Šest litara domaće rakije i tura zimnice za keramičku skulpturu.

Pomoć u renoviranju stana u zamenu za svetleći objekat.

Serija onlajn psihološke terapije za ulje na platnu.

Aranžman cveća za stan u zamenu za umetničku fotografiju.

Aukciju umetničkih radova organizujemo u Boru od 9. do 26. decembra. Možete da ponudite nešto svoje zauzvrat za umetničko delo koje vam zapadne za oko – može i za novac, ali cenimo i dobru ideju, znanje, materijal, uslugu ili bilo šta drugo što već možete da date.

Pored svakog rada biće ostavljen prostor za vašu ponudu – upišite šta dajete zauzvrat. Možete ostaviti i više predloga. Umetnici će nakon zatvaranja aukcije razmotriti sve ponude i odlučiti šta prihvataju – a mi ćemo vas pozvati da se dogovorimo i razmenimo.

Kao Zadruga vizuelnih umetnika, okupljeni smo oko ideje da umetnički rad izvučemo iz tržišnih i institucionalnih stega i da ga vratimo u svakodnevni život, među ljude, u razmenu. Verujemo da umetnost ne mora da bude privilegija, već prostor za susret, razmenu i međusobnu podršku.

Ova aukcija je samo jedan mali pokušaj u tom pravcu, i radujemo se da ga podelimo s vama.

Pridružite nam se na otvaranju izložbe i početku aukcije, 9. decembra u 18h u Galeriji Narodne biblioteke Bor.

—

提供、交换、带走——第二届合作社艺术品拍卖会！

五节汽车驾驶课可换取一幅 A3 丝网版画。

一个周末照顾奶奶，可换取一件视频装置作品。

六升自家烧酒和一份腌制冬储菜，可换取一件陶瓷雕塑。

帮助装修房子，可换取一个发光装置。

一系列线上心理治疗课程，可换取一幅油画。

一套居家花艺布置，可换取一张艺术摄影作品。

艺术品拍卖会将于 12 月 9 日至 26 日在博尔举行。对于你心仪的艺术作品，你可以提出自己的交换方式——也可以用金钱，但我们同样重视好的想法、技能、材料、服务，或任何你能够提供的东西。

每件作品旁都会留有一块空白区域，供你写下自己的报价——你可以提出多个建议。拍卖结束后，艺术家会考虑所有提议并做出选择——我们随后会联系你，协商并完成交换。

作为视觉艺术家合作社，我们致力于将艺术作品从市场与制度的束缚中解放出来，使其回到日常生活之中，回到人们之间，回到互助的交换关系里。我们相信，艺术不必是一种特权，而可以成为相遇、互换与彼此支持的空间。

这次拍卖会只是朝这个方向迈出的一个小小尝试，我们期待与你一同分享。

欢迎于 12 月 9 日 18 点前来博尔国家图书馆画廊参加展览开幕与拍卖启动。

—

Offer, Exchange, Take Away – the second cooperative art auction!

Five hours of driving school in exchange for an A3 silk-screen print.

A weekend of taking care of someone’s grandmother in exchange for a video installation.

Six liters of homemade rakija and a batch of winter preserves for a ceramic sculpture.

Help with renovating an apartment in exchange for a light object.

A series of online psychotherapy sessions for an oil painting.

A flower arrangement for someone’s home in exchange for an art photograph.

We are organizing the art auction in Bor from December 9 to 26. You can offer something of your own in return for a work of art that catches your eye – you can offer money, but we also value good ideas, skills, materials, services, or anything else you are able to give.

Next to each artwork there will be a space for your offer – write down what you are willing to give in return. You may leave several proposals. After the auction closes, the artists will review all the offers and decide which ones they accept – and then we will contact you to arrange the exchange.

As a Cooperative of Visual Artists, we gather around the idea of freeing artistic work from market and institutional constraints and returning it to everyday life, to people, to exchange. We believe that art does not have to be a privilege, but can be a space for encounter, exchange, and mutual support.

This auction is just a small attempt in that direction, and we are excited to share it with you.

Join us for the exhibition opening and the start of the auction on December 9 at 6 p.m. at the Gallery of the National Library of Bor.

Eben hatte ich nach Wochen endlich wieder Psychotherapie. Klar habe ich gemerkt, wie mir die Gespräche mit ihr fehlen. Dennoch bin ich überrascht, wie sehr die Termine entlasten.

Ich habe wie ein Wasserfall gequasselt. Sie hat verstanden, warum $Dinge mich belasten. Und statt mich gaslighten, wie gut ich doch alles mache und wie stark ich bin, hatte sie konkrete Vorschläge. Zum Ausprobieren und nicht „das ist gut für Sie, machen Sie das, sonst sind Sie halt nicht compliment!“.

Es gibt eine Sache, die ich nicht mit anderen, auch anderen Unterstützer*innen nicht teilen mag. Seit meiner Borderline Diagnose habe ich oft Angst zu manipulieren, oder den Eindruck zu vermitteln, ich manipuliere. Ihr konnte ich das sagen. Wir haben in Ruhe darüber gesprochen, auch über meine Angst manipulativ zu sein, oder zu wirken.

Es ist echt krass, wie sehr ich ihr vertraue.

(und ebenso krass, wie wenig ich mir traue! Im laufe der Therapie wollen wir auch darüber sprechen, was Manipulation genau ist, wie ich dysfuntionales Verhalten und funktionales Verhalten unterscheiden kann)

BTW habe ich im Gespräch bemerkt, wie schwer es mir fällt Erwartungen nicht zu entsprechen, die aus Sicht des Gegenübers sinnvoll, für mich erreichbar scheinen. Damit.

#borderline #histrionisch #adhs

By Dunja Stanojević

Each workshop within the Shared Visions project has built on the previous one, gradually expanding discussions about how artists and collectives can share resources, make decisions together, and sustain collaboration over time. Radionica #1 introduced sustainability practices and resource-sharing at individual and organisational levels, while Radionica #2 focused on networks, collaborations, and hands-on exchange. Radionica #3 (LuckyLandCoop/Mutuogenesis) focused on practical experiments with collective decision-making, governance tools, and co-ownership models. Following this path, Radionica #4 explored barter and exchange practices as alternative ways of organising collaborative work.

Earlier workshops explored questions of fairness, collaboration, and community-driven practices, but mostly in discussion. Radionica #5 offered a chance to put these ideas into practice, using interactive tools to experiment with new ways of making decisions or sharing resources. In that sense, it was both a continuation and a step forward: building on what had already been learned while creating new opportunities for practical use and contemplation.

The participating practices included the five selected initiatives from an open call: Club Podzemljica, KC Radionica, Oaze 2.0 /Artist in the Local Community, Urban Sketchers Novi Sad, and Vishni Residency. The call invited collectives and artists from the Balkan region to take part in a workshop that explored how open calls themselves might be rethought. Unlike typical open calls, which demand polished proposals and often leave most people with nothing, this one was different: it invited artists and collectives to bring ideas in their early stages that could later grow within the cooperative itself. The goal was to explore how sharing, learning, and working together could shape creative projects, replacing the typical competitive format with one rooted in collaboration and mutual growth.

The workshop opened with short presentations from the participating practices, each showing how they work within their own contexts. For instance, the Urban Sketchers Novi Sad spoke about their gatherings in the city’s streets and parks, sketching everyday life as a way to observe and celebrate the urban landscape. Another initiative, Oaze 2.0, reflected on how something as simple as a shared bench can become a meeting point, sparking dialogue and collaboration in both cities and villages. From a different angle, situated in Kragujevac, Club Podzemljica brought in the DIY energy of zine-making, screen printing, and poetry; showing how small, collective publishing can keep culture accessible and participatory. KC Radionica, a Belgrade-based cultural space founded by an artist whose practice centres on performance, presented its multifaceted program that includes exhibitions, concerts, and community gatherings, in a space that acts as a home for experimental work and collective activities. And from across the border, the Vishni Residency described their work in a small North Macedonian village, where artists live and create side by side with locals, blending artistic practice with everyday life.  Each practice revealed a different path toward collective making: the Urban Sketchers’ open and inclusive gatherings, the poetic simplicity of community furniture, Podzemljica’s blend of art and publishing as activism, the vulnerability and presence explored through performance, and Vishni’s model of living-artistic coexistence. Together, they painted a picture of art as something deeply social. Something that grows through collaboration rather than competition.

These projects served as a reminder that art doesn’t always have to culminate in an exhibition, or any other traditionally anticipated outcome – it can exist in a workshop, a printed zine, a public bench, or a collective meal. Meeting these practices was a refreshing perspective on different ways of working. Many operate in open, collaborative, and community-centred ways, experimenting with processes that extend beyond traditional exhibitions or projects. With trust in institutions eroding and public support for independent culture shrinking, artist-led collectives have become some of the few spaces where genuine collaboration still happens. They fill the gaps left by unstable systems by creating their own frameworks for care, visibility, and collaboration where none previously existed. They prove that creative work can still thrive, even if formal systems fail to provide it. After the events of the past year – the Novi Sad train station canopy collapse and the student protests and strikes that followed, there is an obvious shift in the local scene. A shift that, in many ways, has reshaped trust and relationships within the local community – leaving people more open to exploring cooperative, community-driven, and sustainable approaches to making and sharing work.

And then, of course, someone had to mention blockchain. 💔 However, the introductory blockchain session with Alessandro Y. Longo didn’t come out of nowhere – it picked up on threads that have been woven through Shared Visions from the very beginning. Concepts like Circles UBI, Crypto Commons, and other decentralised tools have already shaped how we imagine shared structures and alternative economies. Circles UBI, for instance, was a cooperative basic income pilot in Berlin using blockchain technology, which treated currency as a network of mutual trust rather than a pure transaction, tying social relationships to technological protocols. Alessandro, as one of the pilot’s drivers, brought that perspective into the session. His presentation, framed as a “radical tech lexicon”, offered an introduction to the jargon and mindset behind these terms – DAOs, commons, cooperative infrastructures, community currencies, etc. (Alessandro also built on the lessons from our reading group, which he wrote about here, on our blog.) It helped unpack how such tools are being used to rethink ownership, governance, and distribution in self-organised creative spaces: where trust can be encoded, resources shared more transparently, and collective action supported without relying on centralised institutions.

The notion of a “majority” often passes unquestioned, as if to insinuate that fairness was exact and measurable. The familiar and most common principle of “one person – one vote” carries its own limitations; it’s a structure that simplifies complex intent into countable choices. It begs the questions – What does it mean to agree, to differ, or to withhold in collective settings? And how did this particular logic come to stand as the default expression of democracy? Maybe experimenting with different forms of decision-making is less about efficiency and more about sensitivity – learning to adapt to the coherence of a group, where consensus might emerge in ways that numbers can’t quite capture.

This line of thinking set the stage for an experiment involving quadratic voting (QV) – a voting system which allows people to express not only what they prefer, but how strongly they feel about it, offering a more nuanced alternative to a simple yes-or-no majority. Here’s how it worked: Each participant received a limited number of voting credits (99 in this case), which they could distribute across the five projects. The “cost” of each additional vote increased quadratically (one vote cost one credit, two votes cost four, and so on), encouraging participants to think strategically about their strongest preferences. The voting took place anonymously through the RadicalxChange platform, with everyone (both the organising team of the Radionica and participants) voting on how to allocate the open call funds.

Segment from the presentation on QV

The overall budget of €2,500 acted as an example of how collective allocation could function in reality. Although the outcomes revealed varying degrees of support (with Podzemljica gaining the highest number of votes), the group ultimately agreed to distribute the total equally. This was not a contradiction but a deliberate choice – the voting was never intended to foster competition, but to engage in and contemplate collaborative decision-making itself. In that regard, the voting was not focused on efficiency or results; it was centered on gaining knowledge and the practical implementation of shared governance.

Screenshot showing QV results

Within collective decision-making, the experiment with quadratic voting opened space for reflection on fairness, participation, and redistribution. Participants could also redistribute their votes across different projects, change their preferences, and see the proportional impact of their choices visualised in real time. The visual interface, where each additional vote is represented as a square, made the outcomes feel transparent and easy to interpret. The feedback from the participants indicated that this method could become even more engaging with a larger number of projects, where collective preference would become more apparent. One of the few challenges noted was the occasional difficulty participants felt when they were left with unused voting credits. This happens because each additional vote “costs” exponentially more, making it almost impossible to always spend the exact total amount of available credits. We talked about how, beyond funding decisions, quadratic voting can also be used to explore different dimensions of cooperation, from setting priorities in collective work to reflecting on how fair or transparent distribution of resources could work beyond the workshop (in real-life collaborations, organisations, or co-op structures).

So, instead of the old “jury making decisions behind closed doors” approach, the workshop turned the process into a shared experience. Each person received a limited number of credits to distribute across the projects they cared about most, and tested how personal priorities shape collective outcomes. The idea was to see whether decision-making, usually framed as competition, could become a tool for mutual support and learning instead.

Overall, Radionica #5 wasn’t about tidy conclusions or predetermined outcomes. It was about trying things out together, seeing what works, and how small choices and interactions can ripple through a group. Participants explored ways of working that are less scripted and more responsive, noticing how decisions unfold when everyone has a role in shaping them. It showed that cooperation isn’t an abstract value; it’s something you live, test, and experience. It’s something fluid, constantly shifting with every hand that shapes it; something that remembers and changes with everyone who touches it.