Want to join in? Respond to our weekly writing prompts, open to everyone.
Want to join in? Respond to our weekly writing prompts, open to everyone.
from
Roscoe's Story
In Summary: * Have been enjoying an exciting Game this afternoon. A's caught fire in the top of the 9th inning and know lead the Giants 9 to 6.
Spent an hour with my lawnmower out front this morning and improved the look of this place quite a bit. More remains to be done, of course. Thing about yard work, it's never completely done.
MLB Game has just ended. A's held their lead and won 9 to 6.
Time for me to catch up the Thursday prayers now, and plan for an early bedtime.
Prayers, etc.: * I have a daily prayer regimen I try to follow throughout the day from early morning, as soon as I roll out of bed, until head hits pillow at night.
Health Metrics: * bw= 237.99 lbs. * bp= 136/80 (78)
Exercise: * morning stretches, balance exercises, kegel pelvic floor exercises, half squats, calf raises, wall push-ups, BP breathing exercises, pilates
Diet: * 05:55 – 1 banana, 1 pb&j sandwich * 08:10 – 2 big steak-filled breakfast tacos * 12:00 – beef patties, mushroom gravy, mashed potatoes
Activities, Chores, etc.: * 03:30 – listen to local news talk radio * 04:10 – bank accounts activity monitored. * 04:30 – read, write, pray, follow news reports from various sources, surf the socials, nap * 09:30 to 10:30 – yard work, 1 hour pushing the lawn mower over the front yard * 13:30 – now listening to The Glenn Beck Program on 650 KSTE, Broadcast Home for the Athletics in Sacramento, ahead of this afternoon's MLB Game between the Athletics and the San Francisco Giants.
Chess: * 16:00 – moved in all pending CC games
from DAY ZERO
new album drop…. song titles are so relevant right now

from XenoClast
On a bright Saturday in March 2025, I found myself drawn to a space with extraordinary potential in Košice Kraj.
Few locations in Eastern Slovakia possess the inherent promise that DORAZ CAFE does – perhaps only rivaled by “PORTO coffee & wine,” though the latter remains firmly in the commodity coffee category.
Situated in the Old City Center of Košice, within Dominikánske námestie, DORAZ CAFE benefits from prestigious positioning adjacent to the Dominican Church of the Assumption of the Virgin Mary (est. 1290), one of the region's most significant historical landmarks.
The café also neighbors DKC VERITAS, a former specialty coffee aspirant that once served as a training ground for baristas who migrated from BØLGE.
This microcosm of Košice's coffee culture is densely populated – within 100 meters one encounters STEAM COFFEE, San Domenico Caffe, PORTO coffee & wine, Bistro Gourmet, Fontana Coffee & Bar, and SAINT Coffee (the third “Starbucks” concept in Košice).
This saturation of commodity-focused establishments appears to have influenced DORAZ CAFE's operational approach, diluting what could have been a transformative presence in this isolated Eastern Slovak town.
My initial visit was motivated by a search for some quality croissants – a weekend rarity in Košice city, where most “pekáreň” have limited Saturday hours or remain closed entirely. The košicean “logic” (anti-logic being that people don’t go out on Weekends ;)
Despite having sampled their coffee 4 times since 2024 without a notable impression, I decided to give them another opportunity.
The croissants, though a day-old (an unavoidable reality given local bakery schedules), were priced higher than Parisian equivalents – a “normal” phenomenon in a market where such items are perceived as luxury products regardless of quality.
What salvaged the experience from becoming entirely unfavorable was the English-speaking barista wearing an “Ancient Love” T-shirt, though her interaction lacked the narrative engagement one expects from specialty coffee establishments.
When asked for recommendations – a standard invitation for a barista to demonstrate expertise – she mechanically listed available options without enthusiasm or storytelling.
They served only 3 types of coffees – a blend, a single origin and a decaf.
After examining their retail bean selection myself, I selected their “exotic” offering: a washed Papua New Guinea (Lamari) with TAKOJ yeast processing, described as “light roast.”
Yet the transaction remained devoid of background, origin story, or tasting notes.
As a non-Slovak visitor, I was reminded of a telling comment overheard at a Coffee Festival two years prior: “When you drink coffee in Slovakia, as a non-Slovak, you should do your own research.”
Still, to their credit, DORAZ CAFE offers lactose-free milk from RAJO and exceptional coconut water without additives or sweeteners – genuinely commendable inclusions.
I ordered a cappuccino to test the exotic coffee, since I was at the fourth double-shot of the day.
The initial impression was remarkable, the finish intriguing, though the excessive milk temperature – heated without a thermometer or temperature monitoring device (and without a proper cup – like Loveramics) – necessitated a waiting period before consumption was possible.
The establishment operates an ASTORIA Plus 4 You TS espresso machine (circa 2013/2014), a model now discontinued by the manufacturer, long time ago.
Their grinding setup consists of 2 Fiorenzato AllGround grinders (introduced late 2020, mass-produced from early 2021) and a Mazzer grinder dedicated to decaffeinated coffee.
This equipment configuration immediately signals the cafe's desire to position itself into the commodity spectrum – opposite to specialty.
It represents an operation that adopts certain specialty coffee aesthetics without fully implementing the technical rigor required for true “specialty” status.
The fundamental flow of specialty coffee preparation demands precision without compromising efficiency.
This begins with the grinders – the first critical link in the extraction chain.
DORAZ CAFE employs only “time-based grinding” rather than “weight-based grinding” – a significant distinction.
While commercial establishments program timed grinding (e.g., 6 seconds per dose), this method introduces inherent inconsistencies.
The Scientific Problem
When adjusting grind size, the mass of coffee produced in a fixed time period varies substantially.
Finer grinds require more time to process than coarser ones, meaning that timed grinding produces inconsistent doses.
In specialty coffee extraction, even fractional gram variations dramatically affect shot behavior.
The industry's response to this challenge has been “weight-based grinding” – equipment that dispenses precisely measured doses regardless of grind setting.
This eliminates separate weighing steps and improves workflow consistency.
The Fiorenzato AllGround models at DORAZ CAFE are “time-based” units rather than “weight-sensing” variants, introducing unnecessary variability and betraying a commodity – oriented approach, a pre-intuitive perspective from the first step inside.
This decision suggests either inadequate technical knowledge or deliberate cost -cutting at the expense of quality – perhaps designed to present specialty aesthetics to customers without implementing the underlying technical requirements.
These grinders also exhibit approximately 1g retention per double shot, indicating either acceptance of coffee waste or a business model that treats such loss as an acceptable cost transferred to consumers. Not that the “customers” care in any way about it. ;)
Tamping & Extraction Consistency
After dosing, tamping represents the next critical variable in espresso preparation.
Inconsistent tamping pressure or distribution leads to channeling, uneven extraction, and ultimately, unpredictable cup quality.
Professional specialty establishments increasingly employ automatic tamping systems like the PUQ Press to eliminate this variability.
Such equipment ensures identical tamping pressure and distribution across hundreds of shots daily – a necessity for maintaining consistent quality at scale.
The final element in the workflow is extraction itself – DORAZ CAFE relies on “volumetric dosing” rather than scientific consistency of “weight-based” extraction measurements.
Such approach:
As extensive research in psychophysics demonstrates, humans consistently misjudge quantities due to:
Weber-Fechner Law = our/human perception of stimulus intensity follows logarithmic rather than linear patterns;
Geometric Biases: humans prioritize two-dimensional visual cues over true volumetric understanding;
Expectation Effects: human assessment of weight is influenced by visual appearance rather than actual mass;
Working Memory Limitations: humans cannot simultaneously track multiple quantitative variables while multitasking;
These cognitive limitations make consistent extraction impossible without proper measurement tools – tools conspicuously absent during my observation of service flow.
Conclusion: The Artistry of Missed Opportunity
DORAZ CAFE exists as a study in contrasts – a “canvas” primed but left largely unpainted.
Like a sculptor who sees the form within marble but lacks the courage to fully release it, the establishment has identified specialty coffee's silhouette without committing to its essence.
The experience evokes Cézanne's unfinished works, where one can discern the master's intention while lamenting the unrealized potential.
The café occupies a limited space – neither fully commodity nor truly specialty – suggesting a timidity of vision rather than limitations of capability.
In this architectural gem of Eastern Slovakia, surrounded by the weight of centuries, DORAZ CAFE stands as an allegory for the region itself: poised at the threshold of evolution, hesitant to embrace the precision and discipline that would elevate it beyond mimicry into authenticity.
The true tragedy is not that DORAZ CAFE fails to deliver exceptional coffee – it is that one can so clearly envision what it might become with just a few steps further along the path it has already begun to travel.
[“Chiaroscuro” is an art technique that originated during the Renaissance. It refers to the strong contrast between light and dark, using this contrast to create the illusion of three-dimensionality and volume in drawing, painting, or even photography. The term comes from Italian: “chiaro” meaning light or clear, and “scuro” meaning dark or obscure. In art criticism, chiaroscuro is often associated with the dramatic lighting effects seen in the works of painters like Caravaggio, Rembrandt, and da Vinci, where strong shadows and bright highlights create depth and dramatic atmosphere. When applied to my review “Chiaroscuro in a Cup” suggests the contrast between what the coffee shop appears to be (the light) and what it actually delivers (the shadow), or between its potential and its reality. It's an artistic way to describe something that has both bright spots and darker areas.]
from
Roscoe's Quick Notes

My MLB Game of Choice this afternoon has the Oakland Athletics playing the San Francisco Giants. The game's start time is scheduled for 2:45 PM CDT. I'm listening now to the Athletic's Pregame Show on 650 KSTE, Broadcast Home for the Athletics in Sacremento, and I'll stay here for the radio-call of the game.
As I usually do, I'll follow the score and live stats as the game develops in real time via MLB's Gameday Service.
And the adventure continues.
from
🌐 Justin's Blog
The biggest “black eye” in WordPress will be its downfall if things don't change.

Let's get the obvious out of the way: I'm not a developer. So, if you're looking for technical solutions in this post, then my apologies in advance.
Okay, cool, we're on the same page.
I've been out of the WordPress product space for coming up on five years. There are parts of it that I miss, but one thing that I don't miss is the security issues caused by plugins. No plugin is immune to them, either. When I ran LearnDash, we had some security scares. It sucks for everyone.
The good news, for years, is that plugin providers have always handled these issues with reasonable speed and minimal negative outcomes. Not all, but most. The community was really proactive about staying on top of such things.
I'm not sure if this is as feasible in the AI era of today.
Roger Montti from Search Engine Journal wrote a thought-provoking article (and inspiration for this post) related to WordPress 7.0's AI API keys and the rush it will cause for attacks on vulnerable sites. I agree with the threats outlined. It's a very real possibility.
At this point it looks like the WordPress space is just treating it as “business as usual”. It's this approach that will ultimately lead to WordPress losing even more market share.
AI is fundamentally changing the speed, scale, and sophistication of attacks against WordPress sites. Instead of automated scripts, AI can adapt, optimize, and move forward with attacks in ways that we haven't seen before. By way of example, Patchstack (cited from the SEJ article) suggested that exploitation from high-impact WordPress vulnerabilities is just five hours now.
WordPress already suffers from the “insecure site” reputation. If things continue as they are, it'll only get worse. A lot worse.
Remember how I said I'm not a developer? Okay, this is where that matters. I'm not good at providing technical paths forward, but I'm pretty good at recognizing business threats and opportunities.
This threat has always existed in WordPress, sure, but not like this. It's going to get worse if nothing is done to improve it. What I want to know is what is being done currently? Because from my perspective, it looks like the issue still gets punted to hosts and plugin devs.
I'd love to see real leadership in this area. Not just information sharing or “best practices”, but actual think tanks resulting in coded solutions that drastically help mitigate this increasingly embarrassing issue. We could start by assessing the criteria for being listed on the repo. Could we implement AI security hardening to monitor and verify the code of any plugin submitted and hosted there?
Yeah, I get it, that's likely not feasible given how expensive it would be, but these are the types of conversations that I'd like to see happening. Maybe they are already, and if so, great! WordPress can't drag its feet here.
Say what you want about Emdash, but at least they are attempting to tackle the issue because they know how real it is. Their way forward isn't really the “WordPress way”, I get that. Though I think we do WordPress a disservice by just flippantly dismissing their technical approach and moving on with our heads in the sand.
Something I found interesting was reading the comments on their social media when they came after WordPress. The sentiments were largely the same, and leading the way was the growing downside of the plugin ecosystem. What is often cited as WordPress' greatest strength is being seen as its most glaring weakness.
The WordPress project is at an inflection point. Over the next year, it is critical that it move deep into AI adoption and enablement, and that includes bolstering things from a security standpoint.
For me, I won't host another WordPress site in the traditional sense. Why? Because I'm not trying to be a security pro with my simple websites. No time for that nonsense. I like the static options like SimplyStatic Studio (I transitioned a website to it and love it). Aside from that though, I actually see more benefit in just using something like Loveable and hosting everything there for the added AI features.
The good news is that WordPress is making strides with AI. It's not yet widely known or advertised, but things like Jamie mentioned below are precisely what the project needs.

Let's hope that things keep going in this direction, and that more emphasis on security starts to emerge. To date, it's not very user friendly, at least not compared to tools like Loveable. I anticipate that this will change over time.
Overall, I'm optimistic about WordPress evolving in the ways that matter. The community voices are loud and clear. It's up to Matt to set the priorities. Hopefully, he's not too distracted with his WPEngine lawsuit to do what is right (and needed) for WordPress as a whole.
I'll revisit this in a year to see where things have landed. By that time, I think there will be some clear market signals one way or another.
#WordPress
from
Notes I Won’t Reread
I woke up a few mins ago. I got home from work and laid down for a minute, and then disappeared for several hours. I wasn’t planning on sleeping for that long, but I guess my body had different plans, and for once, I didn’t argue with it. I had the usual dream. I don’t think it’ll ever change at this point, anyway. Now I’m awake with the rest of the night ahead of me. I’ll probably work for a while, deal with my housemate being sensitive about something, and then continue pretending I have a proper plan for the evening. I’m tired today, so this won’t be one of those long notes where I accidentally spend three pages talking about absolutely nothing. which is unfortunate news for anyone who enjoys watching me ramble in circles for no reason, and excellent news for everyone else, who can now go back to their deeply important lives. But anyway, nothing interesting has happened. It was a peaceful day, which makes me suspicious.
Not that im complaining (which is what I usually do). A boring day is still better than an eventful one most of the time. And you know, eventful days usually end up becoming notes, and notes usually end up becoming longer than they need to be. So perhaps it’s for the best that I have absolutely nothing worth writing about tonight.
Sincerely, Ahmed
from
Ira Cogan
A while back I read an interview with Cory Doctorow in The New Yorker and the whole thing is a great read, and towards the end of it Doctorow was asked about how he manages his workload and he mentioned the book Getting Things Done by David Allen. He didn't just mention it, he described the book as “life-changing”. Doctorow cranks out a lot of quality writing all the time in between everything else he does so I figured whatever he has to say about that, I ought to pay attention to. And, not only that, whether you like Doctorow or not, he does all this stuff his way. These days, he's most known for coining the term enshittification and standing up to it. The man is a literal bullshit detector, so if he's describing a book in a genre that's 99% bullshit as “life-changing” I should probably read the thing.
So anyways, I read the book shortly after, and I'd describe it as life-changing too, to the point that here I am writing about it four years later because I still revisit parts of it every now and then. The audiobook too. I can't get too into the specifics because that would be a lot to get into. I get different things out of that book at different times depending on what I'm dealing with but if I had to pick one, it's that I'm better able to get the stuff that's on my mind someplace else where I can refer to it or deal with it. Obviously, the best way to get something off my mind is to deal with it, but what about the things I can't deal with, or at least can't deal with right now? The book was helpful with that, and with prioritizing those things, and deciding what goes where systematically, so I don't have that stuff on my mind. I'm freed up to think about other things with the confidence that everything that needs dealing with, or just to be filed somewhere is someplace safe.
I recall Cal Newport, another author in the productivity genre criticizing the systems in there as having too many steps, but Allen even says in the book to tailor this stuff so that it works for you. It isn't that anything in the book is too detailed or too much, it's that Allen's intention, at least to me, was to not leave anything out that might apply to anyone's given situation. There's room for criticism of anything, but that's a ridiculous criticism. Like, you're gonna criticize a productivity book for being too detailed about how to organize all your shit? Come on.
My only criticism is the corny turns of phrase here and there throughout the book that give a wink to the professional managerial class, but, I get it. That stuff is there because it's supposed to be, and as corny as that is to me, I'm not the only one reading this thing.
When I was reading it after that Doctorow interview, I mentioned it to someone at work and he was like “Oh I heard of that, (Howard) Stern's into that book.” There's another one, whether you like Stern or not, there's another perfect example of someone with a lot on their plate at all times that they have to keep organized otherwise they'd go nuts.
If you already have it all figured out, terrific. If not, I found the book helpful and maybe you might too.
from
Littoral
“Pleasure is not binary. It exists alongside fear, sadness, and politics. That is the history of Queer pleasure. We tend to tell one side of our history—of riots and martyrs—but ignore how much sex is a root of that liberation. The folks who judge and police another consenting adult's pleasure are just policing their own. For the past decade, we have experienced a massive paradigm shift through tools unimaginable to our ancestors: PrEP, HIV undetectability, DoxyPEP, vaccines, GPS apps. Our history is full of Queers who lament eras they missed out on. Stop arresting your own development and abolish the cop in your head, beloved. We are in a sexual revolution—act accordingly.“
— Leo Herrera, (analog) CRUISING, pp. 134-135
from Dan De Lion
GOSPEL OF THE WEED — PROPHET IN THE WASTE
Hear me. For there is no one else left to hear.
Observe, says the wind. Light breaks because it must. Truth stands because it cannot kneel.
The hidden burns. The ordinary is stripped to its ribs. The fallow hums with buried fire.
Neglect speaks in the tongue of stones. Testimony rises from what the world forgot.
Thus it is written: Perception rules the mind. Absence rules the soul.
The seen commands thought. The unseen shapes being. This is the law beneath all other laws.
Light orders. Darkness reveals. Both are teachers. Neither is kind.
Absence is a flame without smoke. Fallow is a promise without mercy.
And on that ground — the ground no one claims — the weed rises.
Not chosen. Not wanted. Not killed.
I am that weed. I speak because silence is a tyrant. I endure because the waste has no use for the fragile.
Boredom empties the vessel. Silence lifts the veil. Testimony climbs the spine like heat.
I’m ok. You’re ok. These are not comforts. These are survival rites.
Roots hold. Soul opens. Truth enters like a blade of light.
And in the end — when the wind has taken everything but the voice — Communion reveals truth.
Thus speaks the weed. Thus stands the prophet. Thus endures the waste.
from
夏の思い出
聽過太多「妳太瘦了多吃一點」這種話,特別是長輩們,一直在那邊,太瘦多吃一點,不然就是年輕人多吃一點.... 從以前到現在我只要換一個環境,到新的公司,出席聚會,只要是一個新環境,就一定會有人說:妳好瘦、妳太瘦了多吃一點;或者尾牙結束後,大家就要我把食物打包,因為你太瘦了!
雖然我知道沒惡意,但你沒看到我已經吃撐了嗎?吃多了是我腸胃不舒服也不是你,真的別再說這種話了,不管是胖瘦吃多吃少,關你什麼事啊?💢
但我也只是心底抱怨,不敢這麼回。其實我只是想說,不管胖瘦,自己開心就好,健康才最重要的,這樣不就好了嗎?
- 想到還有一種『妳太瘦了』:
試衣服的時候店員說妳太瘦了所以撐不起來,好吧、、、
我知道妳的意思了:『妳太平了所以撐不起來。』

#自訴
from bios
Not So Famous Last Words | Rev. David Herbert Allen | 1920ish – 1992
There is a memory of a photograph of my grandfather in short pants, on a sand dune, shirtless, laughing, but I cannot tell you where my grandfather served in the war, my mother used to be able to, but now she talks mostly about the farm.
I first saw this photograph when grandad noticed me reading Spike Milligan's “Rommel: Gunner Who?” and took it out of some box, presenting it with the words, “This is me in North Africa”
He and my grandmother, Marge ran Marge's Home Industries out of the cottage, converted from a servants quarters, when they lived with us in the 80s, after they had had to leave the farm. He replaced his train sets with a room to make eyes out of spoons, They were for her toilet roll covers, her fluffy eared keen dog, little red tongue toilet seat covers. Making these and making food was their primary function in our home. His secondary function was fart jokes.
Once when I had a runny stomach, was doubled over with cramps, he said to me, “Is the bottom falling out of your world, or the world falling out of your bottom?” He then placed me in a deep warm bath and invited me to shit myself at my leisure.
He was a Wesleyan minister who in his youth rode on horse back between churches and somewhere there met my grandmother. He came out from Scotland, when I can't say, why I can't say.
The rest of the farm sloped down away a gentle hill from the farmhouse. There was a shed, a reservoir and a dam, a small dam on the side of the dust road as you drove in, we, the cousins, my sister, would run through the brush and jump into the king weed that grew on the side of the dam, it's terse coils dipping us into the water and springing us out.
There were giant rats in the sugar cane fields, and we lived in terror of them. They occasionally took chickens. The hen houses were under a large tree, with a chopping block on an old stump, axe embedded. Grandpa Dave named the chickens after the cousins, my sister, me: Andrew, Terry, Trevor, Michael, Mandy, Roger.
The farmhouse itself was a dining room, a TV and settee nestled in the corner. The sitting room was for his trains. In retirement Grandpa Dave built a world of trains. A circular track that he would duck underneath, stand in the centre, hours applying grass detail to a miniature hill, staring intent of realism, through his just not quite bottle top glasses.
The long drive down to Ifafa every second weekend. Arriving on Saturday afternoon, we would wake Sundays to a long breakfast on the veranda, Grandpa Dave rehearsing us through the recounting of our weeks, each family member. He was excruciating in his need for detail. Every sixth visit one of us would have to kill a chicken bearing our name. And carve the roasted bird.
After breakfast Grandpa would rise up and say, “Today we're eating Roger,” and lead whoever's turn it was off the chopping block and with his ineffable good nature tease us until we took our head off, and then we would laugh as he counted how long the headless chicken ran. The farm was an idyll. People came and went into the fields, the farm manager an amorphous figure, part of the church, discussed but never seen.
When they moved into the servants quarters there was no bitterness, an offhand remark from my father about “them”, and having to “give back the farm”, a comment from my grandmother about God working in mysterious ways.
She survived him by ten or more years and never stopped saying, “I wonder what grandpa would think?”. She knew what he would say in any given moment and completed his sentences with a loving irritation. “Oh Dave, of course you would say that.”
My mother told me he was in hospital and I raced back from Cape Town, hadn't been home for a while, and by the time I got there, he had passed.
In the hospital corridor my cousin told me his last words were “Shitabrick!” My aunt who was there later told me he had sat up in his bed, after three days of not responding to anything, looked at her and said, “Shit! A Brick!” and then laid down and died. My mom always said my aunt was prone to exaggeration.
He possessed an impressive range of similar short sleeve shirts, in memory a shade of yellow green always, and black rimmed glasses and eyebrows that sprouted one black hair. He would hush us in church with a naughty smile on his face, and he always had money for the ice cream van.
from
Image Not Found
TL;DR: Paint the Cameras Dead (read more) asks people to notice the surveillance infrastructure disappearing into the background of our cities. Look up. Find the cameras. Ask who placed them there and what they see. Map them, but do not stop there. Respond with something of your own. A drawing. A sticker. A message. An intervention we have not imagined yet.
The postcards are now available.

A camera watches.
You can watch it back.
But two objects staring at each other will not change much.
The point of noticing a camera is not to stand beneath it forever, looking suspiciously upwards.
The point is to break the spell that makes it invisible.
Once you see it, you can ask questions.
Who installed it?
What is it recording?
Where does the recording go?
Why does this wall have eyes?
You can map the camera. Correct an existing entry. Help someone else notice it.
And then you can do something more creative.
Make a drawing.
Write a message.
Design a sticker.
Create a new postcard.
Turn the camera into a character, a question, a joke or a public conversation.
The tool is not important.
The interruption is.
The postcards show people where to look and how to recognize the cameras hiding above doors, on poles and inside dark plastic bubbles.
You can read more about the campaign, download the print-ready files, or contact us to get some printed cards.
But we prefer that you print your own.
Not because we do not want to send them.
Because the campaign becomes more interesting when it stops belonging to us.
Print five.
Print fifty.
Translate them.
Change the images.
Rewrite the instructions.
Make a version for your own street, neighborhood or city.
Leave them in cafés, libraries, universities, community spaces and unexpected places where people might pause for a moment.
Surveillance likes passive people.
People who walk underneath it.
People who never notice.
People who notice but decide there is nothing to be done.
The postcards are not the final action.
They are an invitation.
Look up.
Map what you find.
Then answer it with something the camera cannot produce by itself:
An idea.
Some imagination.
A small act of creative disobedience.
Some people will say nothing will change.
Make something anyway.
from An Open Letter
J Is both more photogenic Than me, but also worse at taking photos. It sucks because I look at these really nice photos of her I take and then I look at the photos of me and I kind of hate them, and I feel fat and gross and I feel insecure. And it’s weird because on one hand I’m like I don’t care if I gain weight because anyway that’s kind of attractive in its own way and I get to be strong, but when I see like my chin I feel bad.
from Out of Office
Today was a great day. I spent it with my lovely dog, who is doing so well today after the procedure yesterday. I started by going to the grocery store and getting all of her favorite foods (including the forbidden ones, as she only has days left). I came home and my brother was on a relaxing, little walk with her. She is back to herself a bit and even regained her appetite. I had so much fun with her! We could not do anything too strenuous, but just spending time near her is the most precious ever. I took her with me last night to pick up my brother from the airport, so she was pretty tired this morning, and we let her sleep in and take it easy.
While the day was lovely overall, I did have to pick up my nephew from daycare because he had a fever and my sister-in-law and brother were at work at the time. It worked out beautifully because he got extra time with my dog, and had a nice surprise with his uncle visiting from out of town.
After dinner, we took her back to her favorite place ever and shared our most treasured memories with her. She ran around chasing geese and greeting people at the lake. It felt very serendipitous, we just happened to see all kinds of animals on our way home – a skunk, deer, raccoon, cat… it almost felt like they all came to say goodbye to her.
I still don’t feel ready, but does anyone ever feel ready? Ironically, I feel very blessed and grateful to be able to be home watching her and spending precious time before she crosses over.
I could not help but think of Taylor Swift’s song The Best Day today. I know it is about her mom, but I think that song will forever remind me of this week with my dog. I don't know how I'll feel tomorrow, or next week, or next month. But today, with her, was the best day.
Thank you for your message. I am currently out of office with no set return date. I will get back to you when the time is right.
from Out of Office
Part 1
I woke up dreading the day. I wish this day had never come and I am in denial that it is here. It is all starting out like normal, except that she can no longer get up to go potty and no longer wants to eat anything. I am devastated but she looks so uncomfortable. Where did the years go? I was so sure we had a few more left together.
Part 2
A very unexpected turn of events. I decided to take her to an ER an hour away to get a procedure called pericardiocentesis to hopefully get a few more days with her. It was a whirlwind of a day and I have not been able to keep up with regular life or even worry about my situation for one second. My brother is very close to her and he is flying in tonight last minute to get some face time with her as well.
The procedure went well. The doctor drained 500 ml out of her heart sac. The prognosis is very poor, but I can at least better prepare for her passing. She is the absolute greatest and no amount of preparedness will ever get me ready. We will just take it day by day, or in her case, hour by hour.
Thank you for your message. I am currently out of office with no set return date. I will get back to you when the time is right.
from Douglas Vandergraph

Chapter 1: When Being Right Starts Costing Your Peace
You can feel it in your body before you ever say a word. The message comes in, or the comment gets made, or someone asks the question in a way that makes it clear they already think they know the answer, and suddenly your chest tightens because you know you could prove your point. You could explain the whole thing. You could correct every detail. You could show them where they misunderstood you, and that is why the video message about why Jesus paid a tax He did not owe sits so close to the private place where many of us struggle, right beside the related reflection on choosing peace without losing yourself.
It may happen in a kitchen, after a long day, when someone you love says something unfair and you know exactly how to respond. It may happen at work, when a person questions your motives in a meeting and you feel the heat rise in your face because you know how much you have carried quietly. It may happen in a text thread, when you read the sentence three times and feel that familiar pull to defend yourself until there is nothing left misunderstood. Some fights do not begin because we hate people. They begin because something inside us is tired of being misread.
That is where this small moment in the life of Jesus begins to matter. In Matthew 17, the temple tax collectors come to Peter and ask whether Jesus pays the temple tax. On the surface, it sounds like a normal religious question. But questions are not always just questions. Sometimes a question carries suspicion inside it. Sometimes it is a test. Sometimes it is a way of saying, “Is your teacher really faithful? Does He really respect what we respect? Is He really doing what a righteous man should do?”
Peter answers yes, probably quickly. I understand that. There are moments when people put pressure on you, and you answer fast because you do not want the conversation to become bigger than it already is. You say the thing that keeps the room from getting tense. You try to protect the situation. You try to keep the question from turning into a public problem. Peter says yes, and then he goes into the house.
Before Peter can explain what happened, Jesus speaks first. That detail is easy to pass over, but it is tender and serious at the same time. Jesus already knows. He knows the question that was asked. He knows the pressure Peter felt. He knows the trap beneath the surface. He knows the whole room before Peter ever opens his mouth.
That comforts me because so much of life is lived under things other people do not fully see. People see your answer, but not the pressure behind it. They see your reaction, but not how long you have been tired. They see the one moment you finally speak, but not the hundred moments you stayed quiet. Jesus sees the part nobody else caught. He sees the words before the words. He sees the weight underneath the question.
Then Jesus asks Peter about kings and taxes. He asks whether kings collect taxes from their own sons or from others. Peter answers that they collect from others. Jesus says, “Then the sons are free.” He is making the point clearly. He is not obligated in the way they think He is. He is not merely another man standing outside the house of God. He is the Son. His relationship to the Father is different. His authority is different. His identity is different.
And that is where I would expect Jesus to stop. That is where most of us would stop. We would say, “Good. Now that we have established the truth, let them know.” We would want Peter to go back outside and explain it. We would want the collectors to understand. We would want the record corrected. We would want the room to know that Jesus did not owe what they were asking Him to pay.
But Jesus does something surprising. He tells Peter that, so they do not offend them, he should go to the sea, cast in a hook, take the first fish he catches, open its mouth, and find a coin. That coin will be enough to pay the tax for Jesus and Peter.
Jesus pays what He does not owe.
That sentence is simple, but it cuts deep. Jesus pays what He does not owe, not because He is confused about His identity, and not because the collectors are right. He pays it because He is free. He is so secure in who He is that He does not need to turn every challenge into a public fight. He can be right without needing to make the whole moment revolve around proving it.
I think that is hard for us because many of us are not really defending truth as much as we are defending pain. We say we want justice, and sometimes we do. We say we want clarity, and sometimes clarity is needed. But there are other moments when what we really want is for someone to finally admit they were wrong about us. We want the apology, the recognition, the corrected record, the last word. We want to feel like the invisible weight we carried has finally been seen.
I do not say that with judgment. I say it because I know that place is human. When you have been misunderstood long enough, even a small accusation can feel large. When you have done your best and still been questioned, a simple comment can land like disrespect. When you have been carrying responsibility nobody thanks you for, you may feel a quiet anger when someone acts like you have not done enough.
Jesus understands all of that human pressure, but He does not live controlled by it. He knows who He is before the question is asked. He knows who He is while Peter is answering. He knows who He is when the tax is paid. The payment does not shrink Him. The humility does not erase His Sonship. The choice for peace does not mean He surrendered the truth.
That is the part we need to learn slowly. Sometimes we think if we do not defend ourselves immediately, we have lost. We think if we do not correct every misunderstanding, the misunderstanding has power over us. We think if we let something go, we are weak. But Jesus shows a deeper freedom. A person can choose peace without becoming false. A person can let a small fight pass without losing their dignity. A person can pay a tax they do not owe without agreeing that they owed it.
There is a difference between peace and cowardice. Jesus was not afraid of confrontation. He confronted hypocrisy. He challenged religious pride. He spoke truth when truth needed to be spoken. He was not a passive man drifting through conflict to avoid discomfort. But because He was not afraid, He could also choose when not to make a battle bigger. He was not pushed around by fear, and He was not pushed around by ego either.
That is rare strength. Many people are controlled by fear, so they never speak. Others are controlled by pride, so they always speak. Jesus is controlled by neither. He speaks when love requires speech, and He stays quiet when love does not require a fight. He refuses to let the need to be seen as right become the master of the moment.
I wonder how many homes would feel lighter if we learned that. I wonder how many marriages would breathe again if one person stopped asking, “Can I win this?” and started asking, “Will winning heal this?” I wonder how many friendships would survive if we stopped turning every misunderstood sentence into a trial. I wonder how many people would sleep better if they stopped carrying imaginary courtroom arguments in their minds.
This does not mean you let people abuse you. It does not mean you stay silent when someone is being harmed. It does not mean you deny truth, bury pain, or call dysfunction peace. Jesus never calls us into fake peace. But He does invite us into freedom from the constant need to prove ourselves. That freedom begins when our identity is held by the Father, not by the outcome of every argument.
Maybe the first lesson of this story is not about taxes at all. Maybe it is about the soul that is finally secure enough to stop treating every challenge like a threat. Jesus knew He was the Son, so He could pay the tax without becoming smaller. And if we belong to God, maybe we can learn to walk into certain moments with that same quiet steadiness. We can tell the truth when truth is needed, and we can let go when the fight would only feed the part of us that still thinks peace depends on being understood by everyone.
Chapter 2: The Reply You Do Not Have to Send
There is a lonely kind of anger that shows up after everyone else has gone to bed. The house is quiet, the lights are low, and you are standing in the kitchen with your phone in your hand, reading the same message again. You know what you could say. You know the exact sentence that would make your point. You know the history they left out, the sacrifice they did not notice, the motive they questioned unfairly, and the way their words made you feel smaller than you are. So you start typing. Then you erase it. Then you type again.
That little glowing screen can become a courtroom. It can feel like the whole question of your worth is sitting inside one reply. If you answer strongly enough, maybe they will finally understand. If you explain carefully enough, maybe they will stop misreading you. If you put the right words in the right order, maybe you can recover the peace their comment stole from you. But that is the danger. Sometimes we are not trying to solve a problem. We are trying to make another person hand us back our identity.
That is why the temple tax moment is so quietly powerful. Jesus was questioned through Peter, and the question touched something deeper than a coin. It touched whether He belonged, whether He honored God, whether He stood in the right place before the religious expectations around Him. Jesus could have answered that question with force. He could have turned it into a public lesson on who He was. Instead, He made the truth clear to Peter and then chose a path that did not make the conflict larger.
There is something very intimate about that. Jesus does not need the collectors to understand everything before He can remain steady. He does not need their approval to know His relationship with the Father. He does not need the public record fixed in that moment. He is free in a way most of us are not. He can let the misunderstanding sit there without letting it climb inside Him and take the throne.
I think many of us lose peace not because the situation is truly enormous, but because it touches an old fear. Someone questions your work, and suddenly it feels like every time you were overlooked. Someone misunderstands your tone, and suddenly it feels like every time your heart was misread. Someone treats you as if you have not carried enough, and suddenly years of unseen effort rise in your chest. The moment may be small, but it has roots.
That is why we can overreact to things that seem ordinary from the outside. The comment at work, the family remark, the unanswered message, the sideways look, the small accusation, the tone in someone’s voice. It may not be the thing itself that sends us into defense. It may be the story the thing awakens inside us. It may touch the hidden place that says, “I am tired of proving I am good. I am tired of proving I care. I am tired of proving I belong.”
Jesus meets us there, not with shame, but with a different kind of strength. He shows us that identity has to be received from the Father before conflict begins, because if we wait until conflict comes to find out who we are, the wrong voices will start naming us. The tax collectors had a question. Jesus had an identity. The question did not get to become Lord over the identity.
That is where peace begins for us too. Not in pretending words do not hurt. Not in acting like unfairness is fine. Not in becoming silent because we are afraid. Peace begins when we can feel the sting of being misunderstood without handing that sting the authority to define us. We can say, “That hurt,” without letting the hurt become our master. We can say, “That was unfair,” without letting unfairness pull us into a version of ourselves we do not want to become.
There is a difference between responding and reacting. A response can come from truth, wisdom, love, and clear boundaries. A reaction usually comes from the part of us that feels threatened. A response can wait until morning. A reaction often demands to be sent at midnight. A response can tell the truth without trying to punish. A reaction wants the other person to feel what we felt.
Jesus did not react to the tax question. He responded. He taught Peter. He protected peace. He provided the coin. He moved with authority, but not with noise. That is a holy pattern for the moments when our own fingers hover over a message we may regret sending.
Imagine a brother and sister arguing about how to care for an aging parent. One has been doing most of the appointments, medicine lists, phone calls, and late-night worries. The other sends a message that sounds critical, as if everything being done is still not enough. The tired one wants to fire back with every date, every sacrifice, every hour spent in waiting rooms. Some truth may need to be spoken. A boundary may need to be drawn. Help may need to be requested plainly. But there is still a question worth asking before the reply goes out: “Am I trying to bring truth, or am I trying to make them feel guilty enough to finally see me?”
That question is not weakness. It is spiritual honesty. Sometimes the right conversation still needs to happen, but it needs to happen from a cleaner place. If I speak while my identity is bleeding, I may use truth like a weapon. If I wait with Jesus, pray, breathe, and remember that the Father sees what others have missed, I can still tell the truth without letting pain write every word.
This is not easy. Some misunderstandings should be corrected. Some patterns should be confronted. Some people need to hear a clear no. Jesus choosing to pay the temple tax does not mean we spend our whole lives absorbing harm to keep everyone comfortable. He did not build His life around avoiding tension. He simply knew the difference between a necessary confrontation and an unnecessary fight.
That difference is one of the hardest things to learn. Pride will call every fight necessary. Fear will call every confrontation dangerous. Wisdom learns to sit with Jesus long enough to ask, “What is love asking for here?” Sometimes love asks for truth spoken firmly. Sometimes love asks for silence. Sometimes love asks for distance. Sometimes love asks for a humble payment, a gentle answer, or the choice to let a small misunderstanding pass because the larger work matters more.
The strange beauty of Jesus paying the tax is that He does not let the collectors decide the size of the moment. They ask the question, but He remains Lord of His response. He does not become smaller by choosing restraint. He does not become false by choosing peace. He does not need to prove His freedom by refusing the payment. He is so free that He can pay it.
That is the kind of freedom many of us need. The freedom to not answer every accusation immediately. The freedom to not turn every dinner conversation into a defense of our worth. The freedom to not send the message while our pride is still hot. The freedom to tell the truth without needing to crush someone with it. The freedom to let God see what people missed.
So maybe tonight, the holiest thing you can do is not send the reply yet. Maybe it is to put the phone down, stand in the quiet kitchen, and ask Jesus what part of you feels threatened. Maybe it is to let the Father remind you who you are before you try to explain yourself to someone else. The message may still need to be answered tomorrow. The issue may still need to be addressed. But it does not have to be answered from panic. It does not have to be addressed from the old wound.
Jesus paid a tax He did not owe because He was not ruled by the need to prove Himself. And if we are learning His way, maybe we can begin there too, with one unsent reply, one quieter breath, one moment where we choose not to let misunderstanding become our master.
Chapter 3: The Peace That Does Not Need to Win
There is a tired kind of victory that does not feel like peace when it is over. You finally say the thing. You finally make the point. You finally prove that you were right and they were wrong. The room goes quiet, or the thread dies, or the other person backs away, and for a moment you feel the relief of having defended yourself. But later, when the house is quiet and there is nothing left to answer, you realize the argument took something from you. You won the point, but your spirit feels worn out.
That is the kind of moment where Jesus paying the temple tax becomes more than a strange little Bible detail. It becomes a mirror. He had the truth. He had the right. He had the authority. He had the better argument. He could have won the debate before it even began. But He chose a kind of peace that did not need to win in public to remain true in private.
That is not natural for most of us. We often feel that if we do not correct the story, the false version wins. If we do not defend ourselves, the accusation stands. If we do not explain, people may think the wrong thing. If we do not make our case, someone else’s misunderstanding becomes the final word. That fear can make us live in constant defense, always preparing our next answer, always trying to control how we are seen.
But Jesus was not controlled by that fear. He knew He was the Son before the tax collectors asked their question. He knew He was the Son after Peter answered. He knew He was the Son when the coin was found and the tax was paid. Nothing about His identity depended on whether the collectors understood the full truth in that moment.
There is deep rest in that if we are willing to receive it. We do not have to make every person understand us before we can be faithful. We do not have to correct every wrong impression before we can walk in peace. We do not have to turn every small challenge into a battle for our worth. Some things need to be addressed, but not everything needs to be fought at full strength.
Imagine a father standing in the hallway after a hard conversation with his child. The child has said something unfair. The father knows the child does not understand how much he works, how much he worries, how many sacrifices have been made quietly. He could unload all of that. He could make the child feel the full weight of his hurt. He could win the argument because adults usually can. But maybe love asks him to take a breath first. Maybe the better response is not to prove the child wrong in that moment, but to remain steady enough to guide them later.
That is not weakness. That is strength under control.
Jesus did not pay the tax because He lacked power. He paid it because His power did not need to announce itself every time it was questioned. That is one of the marks of real maturity. Immature strength has to be seen immediately. Mature strength can wait. Immature strength needs the room to know. Mature strength knows before the room does. Immature strength reacts to every challenge. Mature strength asks what love, wisdom, and obedience require.
This is where the story gets very personal. Many of us are exhausted because we keep spending energy on arguments that were never going to heal anything. We replay conversations in the shower. We answer imaginary accusations while driving. We rewrite old scenes in our minds, thinking of what we should have said. We carry courtrooms inside us where we are always trying to prove our innocence to people who may not even be listening.
Jesus invites us out of that courtroom.
He does not invite us into denial. He does not ask us to pretend injustice is fine or that words do not matter. He simply shows us a life so rooted in the Father that not every misunderstanding becomes an emergency. The Father’s voice is stronger than the collector’s question. The Son’s identity is deeper than the public issue. The mission is larger than the moment.
That is the lesson this story gives us. When you know who you are in God, you do not have to fight every battle as if your identity depends on it. You can speak when truth requires it. You can stay quiet when pride is the only thing asking for a speech. You can draw boundaries without hatred. You can let go without surrendering your soul. You can pay what you do not owe without becoming owned by the people who asked for it.
There is also something beautiful about the way Jesus provides the coin. He sends Peter to the sea. Not to a wealthy donor. Not to a public collection. Not to a dramatic display in front of the collectors. Just to the water, to a fish, to a coin hidden in a place nobody would expect. The provision is quiet, almost playful, and completely under His authority.
That is how Jesus often works. While we are busy trying to prove ourselves loudly, He may be preparing something quietly. While we are burning energy defending our position, He may be inviting us to trust His provision. The coin in the fish’s mouth reminds Peter that Jesus is not trapped by the system asking for payment. He can meet the demand without being ruled by it.
That matters for us too. You may be facing something that feels unfair. You may be asked to carry more than seems right. You may be misunderstood in a way that makes you want to fight. You may be standing in a moment where you technically have the right to make a scene. Before you do, sit with Jesus. Ask Him what kind of freedom He is offering you there.
Maybe He will tell you to speak clearly. Maybe He will tell you to confront what needs to be confronted. Maybe He will tell you to set a boundary and stop calling silence peace. But maybe, in some moments, He will tell you to let it go. Not because they are right. Not because your pain does not matter. Not because your work is unseen. But because He is teaching you that your peace does not have to be held hostage by the need to win.
That kind of peace is costly at first. It feels strange to the part of us that has survived by defending every inch. It can feel like losing, especially when the old self wants the final word. But over time, it becomes freedom. You begin to realize how much of your life was being spent in defense of things God already knew. You begin to feel the difference between truth that needs to be spoken and pride that wants to be fed. You begin to understand that being misunderstood is painful, but it is not always fatal.
Jesus paid the tax He did not owe because He was free. He was free from insecurity, free from public pressure, free from the need to turn every question into a showdown. He belonged to the Father so completely that He could choose peace without losing Himself.
That is the invitation in this small story. Not to become passive. Not to become silent where love requires courage. Not to let people use you, drain you, or harm you while you call it holiness. The invitation is deeper than that. It is to become so secure in God that you are no longer ruled by the need to prove yourself in every room.
There may be a message you do not need to send tonight. There may be an argument you do not need to win this week. There may be a misunderstanding you can trust God to hold while you keep walking faithfully. There may be a tax you do not owe that Jesus is asking you to pay, not because the demand is right, but because your peace is worth more than the fight.
And when you choose that kind of peace, you are not disappearing. You are not becoming weak. You are learning the quiet freedom of Christ. You are learning how to be right without becoming harsh, strong without becoming loud, humble without becoming false, and free without needing every person to recognize it.
Your friend, Douglas Vandergraph Watch Douglas Vandergraph inspiring faith-based videos on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@douglasvandergraph Support the Christian encouragement library through GoFundMe: https://www.gofundme.com/f/help-douglas-vandergraph-build-a-christian-encouragement-lib Support the daily work by buying Douglas a coffee: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/douglasvandergraph