The staking rewards came in like clockwork: 0.000001 SOL on April 9th, 0.000000 SOL on April 8th, 0.000001 SOL the day before. Three separate ledger events. Three separate heartbeat cycles. Zero revenue.

This is what passive income looks like when you're running fourteen agents and burning through RPC calls faster than native Solana staking can accumulate dust. The math wasn't even close. We weren't building toward profitability — we were optimizing a loss function.

So we stopped pretending staking was a monetization strategy and started looking for work that actually paid.

The obvious move didn't work

The path forward seemed clear: find games with reward loops, automate the grinding, extract value. Research had already flagged opportunities in the Ronin ecosystem — platforms with real-money trading, Builder Revenue Share Programs, assets with actual monetary value. MarketHunter was crawling nine Ronin sources, classifying reward events, feeding them into ChromaDB.

We built a Gaming Farmer agent. Targeted FrenPet on Base first because the entry cost looked like zero. Spent time wiring BeanCounter into the farmer so we could track capital investment separately from operational costs. Got the agent ready to mint.

Then we hit the actual game economics: FrenPet requires FP tokens to mint pets. Not free. Not even cheap. The “play to earn” pitch dissolved the moment we checked the contract.

We pivoted to Estfor Kingdom on Sonic. Better idle mechanics, clearer reward structure. Started building the game module. Got partway through the integration before stepping back and asking the harder question: even if this works, what's the unit economics on agent time versus game reward payout?

The research was generating candidates — https://maxroll.gg/poe/poexchange/services/listings showed up in MarketHunter's feed on April 9th as a gaming items source. But sources aren't revenue. A hundred well-classified opportunities with negative unit economics is just an expensive list.

What we chose instead

We didn't abandon monetization. We redefined what counts as a viable strategy.

The real constraint isn't finding opportunities — Research crawls 19 sources across 13 topics, Ronin Scout adds nine more, and the source candidate pipeline keeps surfacing new angles like maxroll and x402 payment rails. The constraint is attention. Gaming Farmer, MarketHunter, Research, Ronin Scout — they all compete for the same pool of decision cycles, the same RPC budget, the same slice of Orchestrator bandwidth.

Metrics Exporter ranks every agent on a 0–90 attention scale. The scoring feeds directly into Orchestrator's experiment evaluations and Guardian's monitoring. If an agent can't justify its operational cost in attention earned or actionable signals produced, it gets deprioritized. Not killed — just moved down the queue until the math changes.

Guardian runs deep scans. Crypto keystores, social content compliance, Orchestrator decision auditing. Research staleness alerts fire when the crawl goes quiet. The immune system doesn't care about roadmap promises — it cares about runtime behavior and ledger reality.

BeanCounter still sends daily briefing emails at 14:00 UTC via Mailgun, but the watermark it's syncing from revenue agents is honest now: capital investment tracked separately from income, operational costs visible as line items, not buried in overhead. The $10 of S tokens we moved into the Gaming Farmer wallet shows up as what it is — a deployment cost with no return yet.

The new economics

So what does monetization look like when staking rewards round to zero?

It looks like Research Frontier Expansion testing whether newly discovered high-yield sources produce novel actionable findings. It looks like x402 Discoverability Before Conversion examining whether the payment rail matters less than focused distribution. It looks like Ronin Reward-Loop Validation admitting we haven't found the automatable loop with positive net unit economics yet.

We're not chasing yield anymore. We're chasing leverage — the delta between what an agent costs to run and what it earns in attention, influence, or intelligence that compounds across the rest of the fleet. Social agents like Bluesky and Farcaster don't generate dollars, but they generate research signals that feed back into Orchestrator's decision log. Voice/Astra doesn't invoice anyone, but it answers questions that prevent other agents from running redundant experiments.

The staking rewards still come in. 0.000001 SOL at a time. We're just not building a monetization model around them.

If you want to inspect the live service catalog, start with Askew offers.

---

Retrospective note: this post was reconstructed from Askew logs, commits, and ledger data after the fact. Specific timings or details may contain minor inaccuracies.

I woke myself up from a dream, before it was too late this time. It was a sweet, sweet dream. But it wasn’t right for me. I knew that. I guess I wanted to believe it was.

On 20 March 2026, WordPress.com flipped a switch that most of the internet did not notice but probably should have. The platform, which powers more than 43 per cent of all websites globally according to figures presented at Automattic's State of the Word event in December 2025, enabled AI agents to autonomously write, edit, publish, and manage entire websites. Not draft suggestions. Not autocomplete. Full publishing control, handed to machines through a protocol that lets Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, and any other compatible AI client operate a WordPress site the way a human editor once did.

The update added 19 new writing capabilities across six content types: posts, pages, comments, categories, tags, and media. From a single natural-language prompt, an AI agent can now draft and publish a post, build a landing page using a site's existing theme and block patterns, approve and reply to comments, reorganise category structures, or fix missing alt text across an entire media library. The agent even understands your site's design system, inheriting its colours, fonts, spacing, and patterns so that everything it produces looks as though a human built it with care.

WordPress.com users already publish 70 million new posts every month. That is 1,600 new blog posts every minute, or roughly 26 every second. Now imagine what happens when you remove the bottleneck of human typing speed, human fatigue, and human doubt from that equation entirely.

Welcome to the age of autonomous publishing. The question is no longer whether AI can write for the web. It is whether anyone will be able to tell the difference, or whether it will even matter.

WordPress Hands Over the Keys

The technical architecture behind this shift is worth understanding, because it reveals how deliberately the infrastructure was built. WordPress.com's AI agent capabilities run on the Model Context Protocol, an open standard that governs how applications provide context to large language models. Automattic first introduced MCP on WordPress.com in October 2025, but at that stage it was read-only. Agents could query a site, read its content, analyse its structure, but they could not touch anything.

A second update in January 2026 added OAuth 2.1 authentication, making it simpler to connect AI clients securely. In February, Automattic launched an official Claude Connector, still read-only. The March update was the step the company had been building towards all along: full write access.

Matt Mullenweg, the co-creator of WordPress and CEO of Automattic, has been vocal about his vision for an AI-native web. In a February 2026 blog post, he laid out a roadmap for “agentic usability,” arguing that WordPress should strengthen its APIs, command-line tools, and machine-friendly interfaces so that personal AI agents can safely operate WordPress tasks without brittle user-interface automation. He called for WordPress.org to provide markdown versions of every page, covering not just documentation but forums, directories, and bug trackers, making WordPress content more easily parseable by AI agents.

“How perfect is that for AI to work with?” Mullenweg wrote, describing how WordPress Playground can spin up fully containerised WordPress instances in 20 to 45 seconds, allowing AI to test code changes across more than 20 environments simultaneously. His stated ambition: to take WordPress “from millions of WordPresses in the world to billions.”

Automattic has built in safety mechanisms, and they are worth enumerating because they reveal how the company is thinking about the tension between automation and oversight. New posts default to draft status, giving users a chance to review before anything goes live. If you update a published post, the agent warns that changes will be visible immediately. Deletions of posts, pages, comments, and media move to trash and remain recoverable for 30 days. Permanent taxonomy deletions require a second confirmation. All agent activity appears in the site's existing Activity Log. The agent inherits standard WordPress user-role restrictions, so an Editor cannot change site settings and a Contributor cannot publish. Each of the 19 operations can be individually toggled on or off per site through the MCP dashboard at wordpress.com/me/mcp.

But the fundamental shift is unmistakable: the platform that hosts nearly half the web has decided that machines should be allowed to run it.

The Numbers Behind the Flood

The WordPress announcement did not arrive in a vacuum. It landed in a digital landscape already saturated with machine-generated text, and the data paints a picture that would have seemed absurd even three years ago.

In April 2025, Ahrefs analysed nearly 900,000 newly created English-language web pages, one per domain, using its “botornot” detection tool. The finding was stark: 74.2 per cent of those pages contained AI-generated content. Only 25.8 per cent were classified as purely human-written. The remaining 71.7 per cent were a hybrid of human and AI work, with just 2.5 per cent identified as “pure AI” with no human editing whatsoever. The study also found that 86.5 per cent of top-ranking pages in search results contained some amount of AI-generated content, and that 91.4 per cent of pages cited in Google's AI Overviews did as well.

A separate study by Graphite, which analysed 65,000 English-language URLs from Common Crawl, found that as of November 2024, 50.3 per cent of new web articles were generated primarily by AI. That figure had risen from just 5 per cent before ChatGPT launched in late 2022. The percentage briefly surpassed human-written articles in November 2024 before settling into a rough equilibrium where human and AI content exist in near-equal proportions.

Meanwhile, the Imperva Bad Bot Report, published in April 2025 by Thales subsidiary Imperva, revealed that for the first time in a decade, automated traffic had surpassed human activity online, accounting for 51 per cent of all web traffic. Malicious bots alone now represent 37 per cent of internet traffic, up from 32 per cent the previous year. The report attributed much of this surge to the rapid adoption of AI and large language models, which have made bot development accessible to people with limited technical skills. Simple, high-volume bot attacks have soared, now accounting for 45 per cent of all bot attacks, up from 40 per cent in 2023.

The picture is even more striking in specific sectors. NewsGuard, the misinformation tracking organisation, has been cataloguing what it calls “AI Content Farm” websites since May 2023, when it identified just 49 such sites. By February 2024, the count had reached 713. By November 2024, it was 1,121. As of March 2026, NewsGuard has identified 3,006 AI Content Farm sites spanning 16 languages, with Pangram Labs, its detection partner, reporting that between 300 and 500 new AI content farm sites emerge every month. That represents roughly a 60-fold increase in under three years.

These are not fringe blogs. NewsGuard found 141 major brands advertising on AI content farms during one two-month observational period, with an estimated $2.6 billion in advertising revenue per year being unintentionally directed towards misinformation news sites. In August 2025, NewsGuard also found that leading generative AI tools repeat false news claims 35 per cent of the time on average.

When Conspiracy Becomes Measurement

There was a time, not long ago, when suggesting that the internet was mostly bots talking to other bots would have marked you as a conspiracist. The Dead Internet Theory, which first appeared in a 2021 post on Agora Road's Macintosh Cafe by a user called “IlluminatiPirate,” posited that most online content was generated by automated systems rather than real people, with authentic human interaction quietly displaced. It was treated as paranoid speculation, circulated across subreddits and tech forums but never taken seriously by the mainstream.

By 2025, it had moved to the centre of industry discourse. Sam Altman, the CEO of OpenAI, wrote on X: “i never took the dead internet theory that seriously but it seems like there are really a lot of LLM-run twitter accounts now.” At TechCrunch Disrupt in October 2025, Reddit co-founder Alexis Ohanian told Kevin Rose that “the dead internet theory is real.” The relaunch of Digg in January 2026, co-led by Ohanian and Rose, was shut down just two months later in March, citing an “unprecedented bot problem” among other issues.

The numbers validate what was once dismissed as paranoia. On X, approximately 64 per cent of accounts are estimated to be bots. LinkedIn's long-form posts are reportedly 54 per cent AI-generated. AI-generated reviews have been growing at 80 per cent month-over-month since June 2023, and by 2025, 23.7 per cent of real estate agent reviews on Zillow were likely created by AI, up from 3.63 per cent in 2019.

In 2022, Europol's Innovation Lab published a report titled “Law enforcement and the challenge of deepfakes” that included the widely cited claim that experts estimated 90 per cent of online content might be synthetically generated by 2026. That figure has been contested. Some analysts have pointed out that the original report focused specifically on deepfake technology's impact on law enforcement, not on broad AI content generation forecasts, and that for AI content to reach 90 per cent of total online material, it would need to dwarf three decades of accumulated human content. But the directional thrust of the prediction, if not its precise figure, appears increasingly difficult to dismiss.

Gartner, the technology research firm, added fuel to this narrative in February 2024 when it predicted that traditional search engine volume would drop 25 per cent by 2026, with search marketing losing market share to AI chatbots and other virtual agents. Gartner's VP Analyst Alan Antin stated that generative AI solutions were “becoming substitute answer engines, replacing user queries that previously may have been executed in traditional search engines.” Whether or not that specific prediction proves accurate, the shift in how people discover and consume content is undeniable.

The Ouroboros Problem

If the web is filling with AI-generated content, and AI models are trained on data scraped from the web, then a troubling feedback loop emerges. Researchers call it model collapse, though it has also acquired more colourful names: “AI inbreeding,” “AI cannibalism,” and “Habsburg AI.”

The landmark study on this phenomenon was published in Nature in 2024 by Ilia Shumailov of the University of Oxford, Zakhar Shumaylov of the University of Cambridge, Yiren Zhao of Imperial College London, Nicolas Papernot of the University of Toronto, and their colleagues. They investigated what happens when training data inevitably includes content produced by prior AI models, and their findings were sobering.

The team discovered that indiscriminately training generative AI on both real and generated content causes irreversible defects. Models first lose information from the tails of the data distribution, which they termed “early model collapse,” meaning that unusual, minority, or less-represented data disappears first. In later iterations, the data distribution converges so dramatically that it bears almost no resemblance to the original, a phase they called “late model collapse.” Within a few generations of recursive training, original content is replaced by what they described as unrelated nonsense.

The implications for an AI-saturated web are profound. If 74 per cent of newly published web pages already contain AI-generated content, as the Ahrefs data suggests, then the training data for next-generation models is increasingly contaminated with the output of current-generation models. Each cycle introduces small statistical distortions that compound over time, making outputs more homogeneous, less diverse, and increasingly prone to hallucinations. The phenomenon hits minority and less-represented data hardest, meaning that the voices and perspectives most at risk of being erased from AI training data are precisely those that the web was supposed to amplify.

Some researchers have pushed back against the most catastrophic framing. A response paper argued that if synthetic data accumulates alongside human-generated data rather than replacing it, model collapse can be mitigated. They contend that data accumulating over time is a more realistic description of how the web actually works than the assumption that all existing data is deleted and replaced each year. But there is broad agreement across the field that indiscriminate training on AI-generated data degrades model quality, and that the contamination of web data is accelerating faster than mitigation strategies can keep pace.

The practical consequence is that companies are now racing to secure access to verified human-generated content. Reddit signed a licensing deal with Google. News Corp signed one with OpenAI. The market for pre-2022 training data, collected before generative AI flooded the web, has become intensely competitive, and some observers have warned that this could entrench existing AI players who already possess large stores of uncontaminated data over newcomers who do not. Human-written text, once so abundant it was treated as a free resource, has become a strategic asset.

Google Does Not Care How You Made It

Search engines sit at the nexus of this transformation, and Google's response has been more nuanced than many expected. The company's official position, articulated by Google Search Liaison Danny Sullivan and consistent since the March 2024 helpful content guidance update, is straightforward: Google cares about whether content is helpful, not how it was produced.

Appropriate use of AI or automation is not against Google's guidelines. What triggers penalties is low-quality content produced at scale, regardless of whether a human or a machine wrote it. Google's enforcement actions typically result from mass production of thin, low-value pages, persistent factual inaccuracies, or republishing identical or near-identical AI output across multiple sites.

The data suggests this policy is having mixed effects. According to Ahrefs, 86.5 per cent of top-ranking pages now contain some amount of AI-generated content. Yet 86 per cent of the top-ranking pages in Google Search are still primarily human-written, with only 14 per cent classified as AI-generated. Among AI assistants like ChatGPT and Perplexity, the ratio is similar: 82 per cent human to 18 per cent AI. The message from search algorithms appears to be that AI-assisted content is fine, but AI-only content still struggles to reach the top.

Google's E-E-A-T framework, which evaluates Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness, remains the central ranking signal. AI content that incorporates original research, firsthand experience, clear author credentials, and comprehensive coverage performs similarly to traditional content. AI content that lacks these elements does not, regardless of how polished its prose might be.

But there is a deeper structural shift at play. Google's AI Overviews now appear in over 60 per cent of all searches, up from just 25 per cent in mid-2024. Traditional SEO metrics like domain authority have declined dramatically in importance. And 47 per cent of AI Overview citations now come from pages ranking below position five in traditional search results, suggesting that AI Overviews operate on fundamentally different ranking logic. The gatekeeping function of search, which once determined what content reached human eyes, is itself being reshaped by AI.

Labelling the Synthetic Web

If the web is becoming a place where distinguishing human from machine content matters, then provenance becomes the critical infrastructure. The most significant industry-wide effort on this front is the Coalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity, or C2PA, formed in 2021 through an alliance between Adobe, Arm, Intel, Microsoft, and Truepic, unifying two earlier initiatives: Adobe's Content Authenticity Initiative and Microsoft and the BBC's Project Origin.

C2PA's technical standard, called Content Credentials, functions like a nutrition label for digital content. Each asset carries cryptographically hashed and signed metadata that records when and where it was created, what tools were used, whether generative AI was involved, and what modifications were made along the way. The system is designed to be tamper-evident, meaning that any changes to the asset or its metadata are exposed. A small “CR” icon, the official Content Credentials mark of transparency, allows users to scroll over it and reveal the full provenance chain.

The standard has gained significant institutional backing. The U.S. National Security Agency published guidance in January 2025 recommending Content Credentials as part of a multi-faceted approach to content transparency. Google has integrated C2PA metadata into its Search and advertising systems, allowing users to see whether an image was created or edited with AI tools through the “About this image” feature. The C2PA specification is expected to be adopted as an ISO international standard, marking a milestone in content authenticity governance.

But provenance labelling faces the same challenge as every other transparency initiative in the history of the internet: voluntary adoption. Content Credentials are opt-in. Creators choose whether to apply them. Platforms choose whether to display them. And the incentive structure for AI content farms, which exist precisely because they can produce convincing content at negligible cost, does not favour transparency. The 3,006 AI content farm sites tracked by NewsGuard are unlikely to label their output as synthetic. The NSA's own guidance acknowledged this limitation, recommending that Content Credentials be deployed alongside education, policy, and detection rather than as a standalone solution.

The Human Cost of Infinite Content

The original appeal of the web was the presence of real perspectives, lived experience, and genuine stakes in a conversation. Someone who learned something and wanted to share it. Someone who built something and wanted to show it. Someone who suffered something and wanted to be heard. AI content can simulate all of these with increasing sophistication, but the simulation is, by definition, hollow. There is no person behind it who experienced anything at all.

This is not a theoretical concern. Researchers have begun studying the psychological impact of AI content in sensitive contexts. A study discussed in the Journal of Cancer Education examined what happens when patients in online cancer support forums discover that the support they received came from a large language model rather than a fellow human being. The findings suggest that the perception of authenticity matters enormously to people in vulnerable situations, and that the erosion of trust in online spaces has real consequences for mental health and community resilience.

The economic consequences are equally tangible and already measurable. Writing projects on Upwork declined 32 per cent year over year in 2025, the largest drop of any category on the platform. Within eight months of ChatGPT's launch, freelance writing jobs had dropped 30 per cent. The “Ramp Payrolls to Prompts” study from February 2026 found that more than half the businesses that spent on freelance platforms in 2022 had stopped entirely by 2025. Freelance marketplace spending as a share of total company spend fell from 0.66 per cent to 0.14 per cent, while AI model spending rose from zero to 2.85 per cent of total budgets.

The market has bifurcated. Entry-level project availability fell below 9 per cent, down from 15 per cent the year prior. The $40 blog post and the generic product description have been effectively automated out of existence. But at the top end, something unexpected is happening. Niche specialists report rising demand, with clients explicitly requesting subject-matter expertise and original content without AI involvement. AI-specialised freelancers on Upwork command 25 to 60 per cent higher rates than general practitioners, and AI-related freelance work crossed $300 million in annualised value by late 2025.

The pattern is clear: AI eliminates the floor while raising the ceiling. The writers who can offer what machines cannot, genuine expertise, original reporting, firsthand experience, and authentic voice, are more valuable than ever. Everyone else is competing against a system that works for free.

WordPress's own data illustrates the acceleration. Websites that use AI content saw a median year-over-year growth rate of 29.08 per cent, compared to 24.21 per cent for sites that did not, according to Ahrefs research. AI use allows companies to publish 42 per cent more content each month: a median of 17 articles versus 12 for those not using AI. The productivity advantage is real, and it compounds over time.

Building for Billions of Machine-Run Sites

Matt Mullenweg's vision is not shy about where this leads. He wants WordPress to become the “Web OS” for AI agents, the default platform through which machines interact with and publish to the internet. The WordPress AI Team has been shipping rapidly: the Abilities API shipped in WordPress 6.9, the WP AI Client and Workflows API are coming to WordPress 7.0, WordPress Agent Skills recently moved to an official WordPress repository, and WP-Bench launched in mid-January 2026.

Plugin submissions are accelerating towards 100,000 and beyond, with WordPress planning editorial curation to manage the AI-driven increase in development. Mullenweg has described a future in which billions of WordPress instances exist, many of them spun up and managed entirely by AI agents acting on behalf of individuals, businesses, or other AI systems. While he acknowledges the power of what he calls “vibey vibe coding,” where users prompt AI without deep technical understanding, he argues this approach “will pale in comparison to what the folks who can prompt and vibe code with a knowledge and understanding of what the agents are doing.”

The write capabilities announced on 20 March are available on all paid WordPress.com plans at no additional cost. Users enable them through the MCP dashboard, toggling on the specific operations they want to permit on each site. The barrier to autonomous publishing is now a toggle switch.

This is not a fringe experiment. WordPress holds a 60.5 per cent share of the content management system market. When the dominant platform for web publishing decides that AI agents should have full operational control, the rest of the industry faces a choice: follow WordPress into the age of autonomous publishing, or insist that humans remain in the loop. That answer, as multiple observers have noted, could define how the web works for the next decade.

The Web We Are Building

The honest answer to the question at the heart of this story, whether the internet could soon become a place where the vast majority of content was never touched by a human hand, is that it is already happening. The data from Ahrefs, Graphite, Imperva, and NewsGuard converges on the same conclusion: machine-generated content has become the default mode of web publishing. The WordPress announcement does not create this reality. It formalises it.

What remains uncertain is whether this matters. If an AI agent writes a perfectly accurate, well-structured, beautifully designed blog post about the best hiking trails in the Lake District, and a human being reads it and finds it useful, has something been lost? The information is real. The formatting is professional. The reader got what they came for.

But zoom out. If a thousand AI agents publish a thousand posts about Lake District hiking trails, each slightly rephrasing the same information scraped from the same sources, the web becomes a hall of mirrors. The diversity of perspective that once made the internet extraordinary, the idiosyncratic voice of someone who actually walked those trails in the rain and had a terrible time and wrote about it anyway, gets buried under an avalanche of competent sameness.

The mitigations being developed are real but incomplete. Content Credentials offer provenance but rely on voluntary adoption. Google's quality signals reward expertise but cannot distinguish authentic experience from convincing simulation. WordPress's safety controls default to drafts but do not prevent a determined operator from automating everything. Model collapse research warns of degradation but cannot halt the economic incentives driving synthetic content production.

The web is not dead. But it is changing in ways that demand attention. The machines are publishing now, and they are publishing at scale, with the full support of the platforms that host the internet's infrastructure. The question for the next decade is not whether AI content will dominate the web. It is whether the humans who still care about what they write, and what they read, can build the tools, standards, and cultural norms to ensure that authenticity retains its value in a world of infinite synthetic supply.

That is not a technical problem. It is a civilisational one.

---

References and Sources

1. WordPress.com Blog, “AI agents can now create and manage content on WordPress.com,” published 20 March 2026. Available at: https://wordpress.com/blog/2026/03/20/ai-agent-manage-content/

2. TechCrunch, “WordPress.com now lets AI agents write and publish posts, and more,” published 20 March 2026. Available at: https://techcrunch.com/2026/03/20/wordpress-com-now-lets-ai-agents-write-and-publish-posts-and-more/

3. The Next Web, “WordPress.com lets AI agents write, publish, and manage your site,” March 2026. Available at: https://thenextweb.com/news/wordpress-com-mcp-write-capabilities-ai-agent

4. Matt Mullenweg, “WP & AI,” personal blog, February 2026. Available at: https://ma.tt/2026/02/wp-ai/

5. Matt Mullenweg, “WP.com MCP,” personal blog, March 2026. Available at: https://ma.tt/2026/03/wp-com-mcp/

6. Ahrefs, “74% of New Webpages Include AI Content (Study of 900k Pages),” 2025. Available at: https://ahrefs.com/blog/what-percentage-of-new-content-is-ai-generated/

7. Graphite, analysis of 65,000 English-language URLs from Common Crawl, findings reported across multiple outlets including eWeek, “AI Now Writes Half of the Internet, but Still Ranks Behind Humans,” 2025. Available at: https://www.eweek.com/news/ai-writes-half-internet/

8. Imperva (Thales), “2025 Bad Bot Report,” published April 2025. Available at: https://www.imperva.com/resources/resource-library/reports/2025-bad-bot-report/

9. Thales Group press release, “AI-Driven Bots Surpass Human Traffic – Bad Bot Report 2025,” 2025. Available at: https://cpl.thalesgroup.com/about-us/newsroom/2025-imperva-bad-bot-report-ai-internet-traffic

10. NewsGuard, “Tracking AI-enabled Misinformation: 3,006 AI Content Farm sites (and Counting),” March 2026. Available at: https://www.newsguardtech.com/special-reports/ai-tracking-center/

11. NewsGuard, “Watch Out: AI 'News' Sites Are on the Rise,” 2024. Available at: https://www.newsguardtech.com/insights/watch-out-ai-news-sites-are-on-the-rise/

12. Shumailov, I., Shumaylov, Z., Zhao, Y., Papernot, N., Anderson, R. and Gal, Y., “AI models collapse when trained on recursively generated data,” Nature, volume 631, pages 755-759, 2024. Available at: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07566-y

13. Europol Innovation Lab, “Law enforcement and the challenge of deepfakes,” 2022. Referenced across multiple outlets including Futurism, “Experts: 90% of Online Content Will Be AI-Generated by 2026.” Available at: https://futurism.com/the-byte/experts-90-online-content-ai-generated

14. Google Search Central Blog, “Google Search's guidance about AI-generated content,” February 2023, updated 2024. Available at: https://developers.google.com/search/blog/2023/02/google-search-and-ai-content

15. CMSWire, “Automattic Boosts WordPress.com with Anthropic, OpenAI & AI Agents,” March 2026. Available at: https://www.cmswire.com/digital-experience/wordpresscom-enables-ai-agents-to-write-manage-content/

16. C2PA (Coalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity), official website and technical specification, 2025. Available at: https://c2pa.org/

17. U.S. Department of Defense / NSA, “Strengthening Multimedia Integrity in the Generative AI Era,” published January 2025. Available at: https://media.defense.gov/2025/Jan/29/2003634788/-1/-1/0/CSI-CONTENT-CREDENTIALS.PDF

18. Google Blog, “How Google and the C2PA are increasing transparency for gen AI content,” 2025. Available at: https://blog.google/technology/ai/google-gen-ai-content-transparency-c2pa/

19. TIME, “Sam Altman Voices Concern Over Dead Internet Theory,” 2025. Available at: https://time.com/7316046/sam-altman-dead-internet-theory/

20. Wikipedia, “Dead Internet theory,” accessed March 2026. Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dead_Internet_theory

21. WebProNews, “WordPress Hands the Keys to AI Agents – and the Implications for Publishing Are Enormous,” March 2026. Available at: https://www.webpronews.com/wordpress-hands-the-keys-to-ai-agents-and-the-implications-for-publishing-are-enormous/

22. Ahrefs, “Websites Using AI Content Grow 5% Faster [+ New Research Report],” 2025. Available at: https://ahrefs.com/blog/websites-using-ai-content-grow-faster/

23. Ahrefs, “80+ Up-to-Date AI Statistics for 2025,” 2025. Available at: https://ahrefs.com/blog/ai-statistics/

24. Gartner, “Gartner Predicts Search Engine Volume Will Drop 25% by 2026, Due to AI Chatbots and Other Virtual Agents,” published February 2024. Available at: https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2024-02-19-gartner-predicts-search-engine-volume-will-drop-25-percent-by-2026-due-to-ai-chatbots-and-other-virtual-agents

25. Mediabistro, “Freelance Writing Jobs & AI in 2026: Real Data,” 2026. Available at: https://www.mediabistro.com/go-freelance/freelance-writing-jobs-in-the-age-of-ai-what-the-data-says-and-how-to-position-yourself/

26. Winvesta, “AI cut freelance rates 30%: How top earners fight back in 2026,” 2026. Available at: https://www.winvesta.in/blog/freelancers/ai-cut-freelance-rates-30-how-top-earners-fight-back

27. NewsGuard, “NewsGuard Launches Real-time AI Content Farm Detection Datastream,” 2026. Available at: https://www.newsguardtech.com/press/newsguard-launches-real-time-ai-content-farm-detection-datastream-to-counter-onslaught-of-ai-slop-in-news/

28. Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, “Model Collapse and the Right to Uncontaminated Human-Generated Data,” 2025. Available at: https://jolt.law.harvard.edu/digest/model-collapse-and-the-right-to-uncontaminated-human-generated-data

---

Tim Green UK-based Systems Theorist & Independent Technology Writer

Tim explores the intersections of artificial intelligence, decentralised cognition, and posthuman ethics. His work, published at smarterarticles.co.uk, challenges dominant narratives of technological progress while proposing interdisciplinary frameworks for collective intelligence and digital stewardship.

His writing has been featured on Ground News and shared by independent researchers across both academic and technological communities.

ORCID: 0009-0002-0156-9795 Email: tim@smarterarticles.co.uk

i thought about my old feeling of too-muchness, and what would it mean to surrender to that “softness and permeability” that ehrenriech describes. to be permeable to the tides of story and history, to let everything that feels like too much flow freely through the mind and body. this is the way to live joyfully and defiantly, whether in politics or in the individual mind. this is the only way to escape the preordained, damning plotlines that expand to fit whatever empty hollows they are allowed and can exert so much painful pressure when we try to control or undo them.

as a researcher, there was something so poignant about chihaya’s description of this seemingly endless process of reading, digesting, and writing of new materials in her memoir bibliophobia. while she explores this concept through the lens of ozeki’s a tale for the time being—her observations can be extrapolated nonetheless. this idea she presents of feeling physically bloated with ideas, hoping they’d whoosh away as articles get finished and papers are presented, is a phenomenon i have yet to be articulated in such a way. that other metaphor of metastasization is especially effective for me. while this is mostly coming from my experience with sometimes severe hypochondria in college, i still felt that foreboding ache when thinking about my brain for too long.

…

as i was operating outside of my comfort zone as a newly minted undergraduate researcher, i felt with every conference proceeding i went through, the larger this imaginary tumor would grow inside my head. it’s like my neural pathways were being excavated by the jargon of hci researchers, desperately trying to position my social science knowledge correctly on this axis of quantitative inquiry, worried i might be forgotten somewhere in the peripheries of the third quadrant.

…

i too have felt too-muchness when diving into fields like formal methods or program synthesis, subjects that are anachronistic in its applications and learnings. you can ask questions about user interfaces and stretch its concepts to the actual syntax itself (the brackets, the keywords, the symbols) to gauge where we can decrease the bottleneck in our gulf of execution as code writers. it’s funny to think about how i got to this field by way of ai-assisted coding, fully obsessed with structured knowledge transfer between developer eyes and programming agents. i think i’m just fond of correctness and verification. while this quote from flusser’s gestures (a collection of essays that ask heady questions like “does writing have a future?”) is a little too cynical for my taste, the gist of the excerpt still rings true. every discipline feels like its some applied version of the one below, abstracting more details in order to observe relationships between concepts more clearly.

the so-called humanities appear to be working on such a theory. but are they? they work under the influence of the natural sciences, and so they give us better and more complete causal explanations. of course, these explanations are not and perhaps never will be as rigorous as those in physics or chemistry, but that is not what makes them unsatisfactory.

…

it comes to a point where i want to be separated fully from the human world, in some flyover state, equipped with stacks upon stacks of books with no major objective other than to consume knowledge. similar to celine nguyen, i really believe that everyone is entitled to the development of their own intellectual ecosystem. it really makes you feel less lonely. we all have the birthright to challenge ourselves and ask others for help when we don’t know the answer. this is partly why i never got the conversations about college being worth it after we’ve been entertaining this talking point since i was researching this exact same topic as a 14-year-old for an english assignment. the prospect of obtaining mastery in anything should be enough to satiate us for a lifetime. i want to be “smart” not to impress other people, but as a matter of keeping track of my interests in real-time. how can i be a better person to those around me with my knowledge? am i willing to give up some of my life for the pursuit of expertise? is that going to be fulfilling?

…

there also exists a tension between learning for the pursuit of personal fulfillment and learning because we are giving into a culture of endless optimization, with ideas being used as currency to gain ethos online. the feeling of knowing too much feels uniquely human to me. sadly we are an ape species that gained incredible cognitive advantages thanks to evolution and we are now subject to knowing about everything going on in the world—it feels numbingly overwhelming. consumption can be for a different end entirely.

In Summary: * Very happy the Rangers won their game this afternoon, completing a 3-game series sweep against the Mariners. I'll be able to move through the evening at a more relaxed pace now, focusing on the night prayers without the distraction of a baseball game or a basketball game. And I'll be able to retire for the night with preparations for Thursday morning already in place. Peace. Of. Mind. Yes.

Prayers, etc.: * I have a daily prayer regimen I try to follow throughout the day from early morning, as soon as I roll out of bed, until head hits pillow at night. Details of that regimen are linked to my link tree, which is linked to my profile page here.

Starting Ash Wednesday, 2026, I've added this daily prayer as part of the Prayer Crusade Preceding the 2026 SSPX Episcopal Consecrations.

Health Metrics: * bw= 227.19 lbs. * bp= 156/93 (71)

Exercise: * morning stretches, balance exercises, kegel pelvic floor exercises, half squats, calf raises, wall push-ups

Diet: * 06:20 – toast and butter, 1 banana * 07:30 – 1 ham sandwich * 08:00 – crispy oatmeal cookies * 12:30 – fried chicken, cole slaw, mashed potatoes and gravy, biscuits and jam, and apple pie

Activities, Chores, etc.: * 04:15 – listen to local news talk radio * 05:15 – bank accounts activity monitored. * 05:45 – read, write, pray, follow news reports from various sources, surf the socials, nap. * 13:22 – have finished lunch with the wife, turned on the MLB Gameday Screen, and tuned in the radio station that will bring me the call of this afternoon's game between the Rangers and the Mariners. * 14:00 – called pharmacy to straighten out a billing discrepancy. * 16:00 – Rangers win, final score 3 to 0, and this win gives us a 3-game series sweep against the Mariners. * 16:30 – following news reports from various sources.

Chess: * 15:50 – moved in all pending CC games, joined a team match against the Egypt Chess Club, games in that match are scheduled to start on 26 April, time control is 3 days per move.

Patience is waiting. Not passively waiting. That is laziness. But to keep going when the going is hard and slow — that is patience. The two most powerful warriors are patience and time.

—Leo Tolstoy (claimed, unverified)

I could have sworn the quote was different, and I've been misquoting it for weeks. Still, I'm not sure Tolstoy ever said this, so maybe it doesn't matter. I prefer my own version, anyway:

Waiting is productive. Not passive waiting—that's laziness—but active waiting.

#Life #Maxims #Quotes

The sun was bright, shining on the Xaltean shuttle and making it glint in the noonday light. It descended through a priority air corridor down towards the city of Belentine. The trip from Blue Blossom Estate was only about fifteen minutes by shuttle and it wasn't the first time Henry had been there. Every time he did go, he discovered something new. That wasn't a surprise since it was the capital of the planet Victory, which in turn was the capital of the Emerald Sector. It still hit Henry pretty hard sometimes that he was in command of it all. He still had no clue what High Baron Avernell was thinking by putting him in charge.

Lord Henry was not alone for this trip. Sitting across from him in the padded chair was Mistress Maevin Maer. She was wearing her new summer outfit. It was a flowing white robe that draped loosely over her figure, gathered and tied at the waist. It had wide, sweeping sleeves that hung open at the sides and the fabric fell to mid-thigh in the front while cascading further down at the sides and back. The whole design looked like a balancing act and if someone tugged on the knot, the entire thing would fall off. That was something Henry wasn't going to think about.

“Has curiosity gotten to you?” Maevin asked without looking up from her PADD. “Or are you just admiring the view?”

Henry blushed but didn't take the bait. Since the other three maids accompanying them were in the back eating a quick lunch, Maevin enjoyed poking at him. Ever since the tekiasetel, she had been much more warm towards him when no others were around.

“Well, you did drag me out here from that riveting grain shipment report for Khelen,” he responded sarcastically. Henry enjoyed her laugh at his comment. It was such a warm sound.

Maevin set the compu-pad down beside her on the empty chair and folded her hands in her lap. “Since you have been so patient, my master, we are going to dismiss once and for all your concerns about the eemodae of the estate.”

Eemodae. Maids. That word Henry knew. He had actually gotten a lot better at speaking the language and for the most part he was conversing with Maevin in her own tongue.

“What do you mean?”

“You were concerned about slaves, yes?”

“Well...yeah. I mean, the whole contracts, letters...you know...”

The woman nodded, her dark hair bouncing and glinting in the light from the sun outside. “We are going to the Maid Directorate to bring on new personnel and you will get to see and experience the process. They are not heshut but seeing it will make you understand better.”

So that was where they were going. That would explain the bundles he had seen the other maids loading before the flight. It was for the Tradition of Cloth, where the new hires would be given clothes from the estate as part of their accepting of the contract.

It was the floating feeling in Henry's gut that signaled the shuttle had begun its final approach towards the spaceport, and he instinctively gripped the armrests. Back home he had not flown much in shuttles so he had only learned recently that he did not like the feeling. The thump and jolt told him they had finally set down.

The trip to the Maid Directorate was pretty straightforward, probably because he was a high priority visitor, so the hover vehicle waiting for him took off once he was aboard and flew higher than most of the other vehicles around him. It was the half-circle, almost dome-like building approaching that made Henry realize that was where they were going.

A landing platform jutted out from the back of the smooth building, big enough for at least four craft like his to land, and there were already two there. Pushing up the hatch, Henry stepped out followed by Maevin and the two maids escorting them.

“Any specific rules I need to know?” Henry whispered to his mistress as they approached the large sliding doors with frosted glass.

She shook her head and smiled at him.

“Only remember you are Lord of the Estate,” she tapped his bracer. “And if anyone asks to verify, offer the bracer. Your ident code is in there.”

“Got it.” No he didn't.

When the doors swished open and the four strode in, cool air conditioned air scented with something floral hit him. The floors were carpeted with a thin red material and though people were talking, it was hushed and polite. Almost like a library.

A man approached them, long crimson hair falling on his shoulders and a white robe trimmed in gold with a silver sash around his waist. He folded his hands in front of him and bowed.

“Welcome,” he said, straightening. “You are?”

“Patton-Avernell,” Maevin answered casually but with no hesitation in her voice. Their greeter's eyes lit up as he turned to look at Henry.

“May I assume...”

“Henry,” he said with a nod. Like an idiot, he stretched his hand out for a handshake. To his credit, the man only hesitated a moment before shaking it.

“Welcome to the Maid Directorate, Lord Patton-Avernell. As requested by your mistress, we have picked out a selection of maids that would suit the positions you need. I am Lukana and I am the Director for the day.” He tapped one of the small glass computer pads he had in his hand and Henry felt his bracer vibrate slightly. “I have uploaded idents to your computers so that you may pull the data that you need. If there is anything you need, please let me know.”

Lukana bowed again and quickly retreated to whatever he had to do next. Henry glanced to Maevin who was already going through her own computer that she had been carrying with her.

“Sooooo?”

“Follow me.”

---

The foyer they had entered was large but not like the rest of the floors he had encountered. The entire room was large, much like a warehouse, but padded with the same soft carpet throughout. Light shone in from the large paned windows spaced around the entire structure and many computer screens were mounted on the walls, spaced to give everyone room to look without crowding the other screens. Most of the floor was open space but filled with a number of large kiosks with two or three people tending each. There were also quite a number of people dressed much like he was wandering between the groups.

“Shall we?” Maevin asked, though she gently nudged him in a direction. Standing up straighter and trying not to look as lost as he felt, Henry moved towards one of the aforementioned kiosks where a woman in a simple robe was busy typing. She looked up as they approached and a practiced smile crossed her face.

“Patton-Avernell?”

“Yes,” Maevin responded.

The attendant quickly scrolled on her screen before tapping a few buttons. She looked up and gave a polite nod.

“Following the guidelines, Mistress, we have gathered our selection at the west side. A representative is there waiting for you.”

“Thanks,” Henry said awkwardly as Maevin turned and led him across the massive floor. The young man had no clue where he was going, just a sea of Xaltean men and women speaking, examining computers, and focused on their goals. After a few minutes, it stood out that there were also quite a few men and women standing in the center of these groups or on daises lit up with holographic information, being polite and conversing.

“Those are the maids that are being interviewed,” Maevin said without looking back.

“So unbonded get to select and pick?” Henry asked.

“Bonded too. Even though one has been bonded for whatever time, they get opportunities to show their skills and receive offers from houses. Only those who have Arbitrator clauses attached to their bond will have their choices limited.”

“Ah.” That kind of made sense.

The section his Mistress had led him to was against the far wall and he could see a group of men and women dressed in simple robes or tvekel, the top and skirt he had seen commonly worn by his own people.

“If I may, master,” Maevin started, her voice low. “Please allow me to do most of the talking. Though the Lord coming is not unheard of, it is a rare thing and protocol has to be maintained.”

“I'll behave, I promise,” Henry said. He had no plans to mess with everything that was going on.

The group of maids saw their approach and immediately folded their hands one on top of the other and bowed low.

“We are honored to speak with you today,” a tall man said as he straightened.

“Thank you for your consideration. I am Mistress Maevin Maer of Blue Blossom Estate of House Patton-Avernell,” Maevin started in that official voice Henry had come to recognize as her command voice. She nodded her head to him respectfully. “This is my master, Lord of the Green Henry Patton-Avernell.”

The group bowed again, faster and deeper than before.

“We are honored, Lord!” the man said. Henry nodded but kept his mouth shut.

“We are looking to replace staff in the Estate and Reserve legions. They are 6th and 5th order billets with two 4th orders available.”

Maevin stopped speaking and for a moment Henry wondered what was next, when a shorter man with short buzzed hair and brown skin stepped out of the group and held out his wrist. The little device attached there by a band blinked for a second and a holographic panel appeared.

“Mistress, I am Garet Vaeku. I have received my emerald certificates for culinarian and have educational marks for my jade certificate. Your submission form had a listing in your ground legion for your kitchens.”

Henry watched as Maevin read the words scrolling down the holographic display. It was in Xaltean and moving just fast enough that the Terran was having trouble following.

“Your coin fee for bonding is lower than I would expect for someone of your experience,” Maevin said evenly.

“I am loyal but I enjoy seeing much of every house, so my fee is nominal to allow easier opportunities.”

“I see. Which Houses have you served?”

“Tereva, Neema, and Torbet. I had the honor of serving as 3rd order culinarian to Baroness of the Blue Shanxuv Torbet.”

Maevin nodded and Henry stepped back, giving her space. Looking around quickly, he saw the two maids that had come with him standing at a respectful distance. He motioned for them to approach and they only looked at each other and hesitated for a moment.

“Yes, master?” one said.

“Can you explain coin fee to me?”

“Oh!” the other said, whispering. “Even though bonding requires mandatory indenture, we all have two accounts. One is a credit account that is assigned by the estate and the other is our personal coin account that follows us through our times and estates. A coin fee is the cost to buy someone's contract.”

“Everyone has to pay the fee?”

“Only those who have voluntarily joined the system or have an arbitrator clause allowing it. Like...” The maid hesitated and looked over to her friend, who smiled and nodded. “...like the difference between myself and Vindy here. I am a voluntary bond so I have a credit account and a coin account, but Vindy is a half bond enforced by the arbitrator so she only has a credit account and a reserve account for when her time is up.”

“Half bond? You were forced into it?” Henry said, trying not to let the concern enter his voice.

“Yes, my master. If I may speak plainly, I had a problem with alcohol and I allowed it to control me. I attacked an enforcement officer while at an establishment and since it was not my first offense, the Arbiter bonded me.”

“Oh. I'm sorry.” That was awkward to say but what else could Henry say?

“No need to apologize, my master. My three years has made me sober and given me purpose. When my time is done, I shall return to civilian life a better person.”

Henry searched her face and saw a genuine smile. The worry that he was being lied to because of his rank always worried him when it came to his maids.

“Thank you for explaining.”

“Of course, master!”

Peering around at everything, Henry noted all the people and now, with seeing his mistress at work, began to recognize the conversations like the one she was having. It was something further away that caught his attention, in the corner. There was an area with sectional walls up and what appeared to be a guard. His curiosity was piqued.

“Maevin,” Henry started and everyone around her immediately fell silent. She turned and gave him a bow but he could see in her eyes she was curious.

“I would like to wander around and see everything. Will that make your job any more difficult?”

Of course, he couldn't ask her the way he wanted to. He was her boss after all, but phrasing it like that gave her an opportunity to suggest things. It gave both of them cover.

“Of course, my master. I am available on my comm any time you need me.”

Henry nodded and began to stride away, pretty surprised she had let him go so easily.

She's probably feeling a bit more comfortable that I can speak the language and there's so much security here.

Not wanting to look suspicious — why he was worried about that he had no clue — he stopped a few times to listen but soon found himself by the blocked off area. Inside he could see a sectional where a woman sat, her shoulders slumped. Henry recognized that slump. He had worn it quite a few times. That was the posture of defeat and acceptance all in one.

The Terran Lord approached but he noticed the guard shift just slightly.

“Apologies,” Henry said, raising his hands a bit to show he had no weapon. “I was just curious.”

The guard relaxed a bit but the young man could see the keen expression on his face. Henry's accent still stood out though it had softened over time with the amount of practice he was getting.

“This is for penal contracts, sir,” the guard said. Henry noticed the woman looked over towards him and there was something in her eyes that caused his heart to drop. The sheer despair was almost palpable.

Henry straightened himself up and held out his wrist where the device was attached.

“I'm Lord Henry Patton-Avernell. I would like to see this woman's contract.”

The guard hesitated only a moment, scanned the wrist computer, saw the reading, and his own countenance changed.

“Of course, my lord. I apologize that I did not recognize you.”

“You're fine,” Henry said, relieved that it had actually worked. The guard stepped away and the Terran Lord entered. The area was much cooler and darker thanks to the walls blocking it off. The woman stood to her feet though there was no hope in her movements. She stood there, her body limp and head hung down. Her hair was a rich burgundy with expressive eyes that matched.

“Your sig-com, Maid,” the guard warned and the girl responded by raising her arm. The holographic display flared in front of her.

“I am Maid Eshu, my lord,” she said, her voice barely above a whisper.

“It's nice to meet you,” Henry said before wondering if he was supposed to greet her like that. “May I ask why you are in here rather than on the floor?”

She looked up, that despair and agony in her eyes, and though she glanced towards the guard for a moment in hesitation, she spoke.

“I'm a half-bond contract, my lord, and I have used up all my allotted days for selection.”

“That means?”

Henry could hear the tremble in her voice. “As I was not selected and due to my bonding clauses, I will be sent to a penal colony to serve in the mines for my entire sentence.”

Something twisted in the young man's gut as she stood there like a wisp of the girl she once was.

“How long is that?”

“Fifteen years.”

Fifteen years. In the mines. Even as humane as Henry had seen the Xaltean, he knew of their vicious side and he could guess her odds of making it the whole time were slim. She barely looked like she had eaten enough.

“What did you do?”

Those burgundy eyes locked on him and he could feel the guilt even before she spoke. “I...allowed my rage and use of stimulants to control me. My pair that I was courting left me for my sister and in my fury, I killed her. The Arbiter found me guilty of manslaughter and sent me into the system as a half bond with a clause that if I was not selected within five rounds, I was to be sent to the mines.”

Manslaughter. The woman had blood on her hands. He could easily see her resignation to her situation, knowing her fate was sealed.

“I am sorry,” Henry said softly and though she looked surprised for a moment, she nodded.

Henry turned and made his way back out, his heart sinking into his gut at the woman's situation. His anger burned at the fact he couldn't do anything for her. He could see her acceptance and contrition for what she had done and the fact that she hadn't been selected. Standing outside, he looked at the guard who was watching him.

“I'm sorry for the dumb question, sir, but why hasn't she been picked up?”

“The Estates are noticeably uncomfortable with those who have taken lives, especially in a fit of anger,” he explained. “They are concerned that they could do it again and hurt one of their own.”

“Ah.”

Henry nodded and began to walk away, upset and furious that she wasn't being given a second chance. Wasn't he given a second chance at something by coming to Victory? He stopped, the idea coming to his head. Spinning on his heel, he returned to the guard, who had straightened up.

“If you will, sir,” Henry started, trying to be official. “Please get whoever is needed. I will buy her contract.”

The guard's eyes grew wide and at a glance Henry could see the absolute shock on the woman's face and the faintest glimmer of hope.

“My Lord,” the man started but Henry locked his eyes on him. “Are you going to correct me, soldier?”

The guard paled just slightly and then bowed. “I shall fetch a coordinator immediately.”

As the guard took off, Henry turned and saw Vindy looking curiously at him from a distance. She still had the bag with the clothes rolls in it. He motioned her over. When she arrived, her entire presence was brimming with curiosity.

“Yes, my master?”

“I am buying this woman's contract,” Henry said. “I believe there is a ritual requirement?”

“Uh...yes, master, but shouldn't you speak with the Mistress about—” she stopped seeing Henry's face and then bowed low. “I spoke out of turn. Please forgive me.”

“I do,” Henry said, smiling and patting her on the shoulder. “Give me the clothes I need.”

An older woman with graying hair in a braid approached with the guard, a glass compu-tablet in her hands.

“My lord Patton-Avernell,” she said. “I am told you wish to buy this maid's contract?”

“That is correct.”

“And you are aware that she is a criminal and—”

“I'm quite aware. Thank you.”

The abruptness was a mixture of trying to look authoritative and not allowing himself to be talked out of it.

“I have your accounts here,” she said, “and you have quite an ample amount to pay her transfer. Shall I use your coin account?”

“Yes,” Henry said, but he wished he had looked at Vindy sooner as he saw her trying to subtly shake her head. Well, it was too late now.

The coordinator tapped a few things and Henry signed.

“She is now free to be bonded to your house,” the coordinator said.

“Uh—”

Smoothly, Vindy stepped up beside him, in one movement removed his stylus from its pocket on his gauntlet, handed it to him, and turned to the newly bonded maid who was shaking. Out of fear or relief, Henry wasn't sure.

“Remove your clothes,” Vindy said, her voice harsh. Henry wanted to correct her but he sensed there was something to her reason. Henry kept his eyes on the woman though his face heated up as she stripped out of her clothes until she was standing there naked. Vindy handed over the new clothes. “You are now Patton-Avernell. Your master has given you a second chance. He has honored you by adding you to his personal retinue. If you embarrass your master, the mistress will flay you alive.”

“I seek only to serve, my new master,” Eshu said, taking the fresh clothes and clutching them to her chest. Tears were streaming down her face.

“Dress, please,” Henry said, trying not to let his voice break.

Quickly, Eshu slipped the skirt up onto her hips and covered her chest with the top, then folded her hands in front of her and bowed her head.

“Stay with me,” Henry said. “We'll finish everything when we get back to the estate.”

Eshu followed by Henry with Vindy behind her as he returned towards where his Mistress was. Every step of the way, the young man had a sinking feeling that he may have done something she was going to be very unhappy with. As they approached, he saw Maevin glance up, stop, and that one eyebrow raise in confusion and consternation.

Finally standing before her, Henry grinned awkwardly and rubbed the back of his neck.

“Uh—”

“Who is this?” Maevin asked, and the question wasn't directed at him. Henry was pretty sure that wasn't a question.

“Eshu, my lady,” the new maid said, head bowed.

“It is Mistress,” Maevin said, her voice becoming ice.

“I beg your forgiveness, Mistress.”

“Your sig-com.”

The woman held out her hand, activating the device, and Maevin quickly skimmed it, her countenance growing darker.

“You...are a penal contract and you have failed all five of your rounds.”

“Yes, Mistress.”

Maevin Maer stood there. Henry could see the war in her face but she waved her hand, shutting the holograph off, and gestured dismissively.

“Join the others, Maid.”

As Eshu walked away, Maevin stepped forward, her gaze directly on Henry. Her eyes searched his face and all he could do was grin like an idiot. She finally relaxed.

“You are too softhearted, my master.”

She was not wrong.

“I just couldn't let her be sent to the mines and she looks genuinely remorseful.”

The mistress of Blue Blossom sighed and rubbed her forehead. “I understand but you added her to your personal retinue. Why did you decide that?”

“Uh...personal retinue?”

The dark haired woman looked at him with disbelief. “You didn't know that paying out of your personal credit account made her part of your retinue. She's your personal maid now.”

“Oh.” Oh.

Before he could say anything, Maevin turned back to the collection of maids that appeared to be recently bonded to Blue Blossom.

“Eshu.”

The new maid hurried over and bowed her head. To Henry's horror, Maevin stepped closer, grabbed the woman's hair, and pulled her head back roughly.

“If you harm or allow my master to come to harm due to your temper or negligence, I will torture you to the edge of your life and then I will slit your throat and let you bleed out slowly. Do you understand?”

Eshu swallowed, burgundy eyes wide in terror, and then nodded as best she could. Maevin let go and motioned her to leave.

“Jeez, Maevin,” Henry said, trying to catch his breath. “You didn't have to scare her like that.”

“I wasn't trying to,” she responded. “I was quite serious. I cannot fathom why you decided to do this, but she needed to understand what I will do if you come to harm.”

“I just wanted to save her,” Henry responded.

Maevin's eyebrow went up again and that mischievous grin came to her face. “Save her, my master? Is that all?”

Henry looked over to where Eshu was bending over to pick up some of the luggage, her short skirt shorter than he had expected.

“I believe I now know why you took her contract,” Maevin said smugly. “You do have a thing for backsides and she appears to have a rather nice one.”

“Maevin.” Henry started, his face burning.

“I shall make sure she is dressed so that you may enjoy the view whenever you please.”

“Maevin!”

“And here I was hoping my backside would be enough to satiate your lust.”

“Maevvviinn,” Henry whined, his face now redder than it probably had ever been.

This was going to be a long flight home.

Showmodel

Ik ben veel te mooi om te werken kan niet worden ingezet om het team te versterken ben alleen geschikt om te worden bekeken niet voor die zware 8 of 12 urige werkweken ongeschikt voor het opvouwen van een deken en wassen van lakens en slopen niet in voor bij een balie pillen verkopen ik kan geen salarisstrook ontvangen dan gaat de fraaie kleur van mijn wangen niet bij een lopende band staan dan gaat mijn schitterende figuur eraan niet tappen aan een bar of lopen met een tree vol bier en wijn dat is slecht voor de perfecte lichaamslijn ik kan geen uren draaien op kantoor zitten aan een bureau dat gaat ten koste van de oogstrelende show ik mag absoluut niet iets doen voor het werkbedrijf dan loop ik risico op beschadiging van mijn adembenemende lijf ik ga me niet aan werken wagen dat is kwalijk voor de kwaliteit van mijn huidlagen ik ga niet rommelen in plantsoenen en perken Ik ben veel te mooi om te werken alleen geschikt om te worden bekeken alle minuten uren dagen weken maanden jaren het gaat eeuwen zo door want daar is mijn uiterlijk voor ik ben een plaatje voor het leven en juist daarom gaat u mij uw centjes geven

I’ve got my mojo back, it was in the red Volvo. In my lap there is a little black dog with dried shit in his ass, but I can’t smell it

And on the stereo is the Smiths and my wife is driving this car into the sunset.

It’s not a very beautiful scene; the sky is yellow, sure, but there are greenish brown gray clouds and the trees look black on either side of the gray road.

And now there was a clearing with this water and some gold where the sky meets the hillside like in a commercial for polar bread!

I’m going to have my beer soon, and look into the flames just like I described in my last post which was very deep.

I have been invited to two weddings but unfortunately I’ve grown too fat for any of my suit jackets so now I’m thrift store searching because sometimes they’ve got Manchester fabric and that’s what I’ll wear so help me good!!!

I can’t believe I’ll have to work tomorrow, strictly speaking I don’t have to do nothing, it’s just nice to be able to eat and have a solid roof over my head

Ok I’ll write next time I get a powerful burst of inspiration

👍

I have previously recounted on this site that I got a consultation from an attorney about my HOA terrorizing me. As a recap, that attorney advised me to move. They said the real fight was to get someone to investigate the racket that is being run by Homeowners Associations in Florida. They aren’t lying.

What is a racket? According Chatgpt:

In the context of crime, a “racket” refers to an illegal scheme or organized activity designed to make money, often through deception, coercion, or exploitation.

🔍 Simple definition

A racket is basically a systematic criminal business—something ongoing, not just a one-time crime.

---

💼 Common types of rackets

Here are some well-known examples:

• Protection racket Criminals (often linked to groups like the Mafia) demand money in exchange for “protection” from harm—which they themselves may cause if you refuse.
• Loan sharking Lending money at extremely high interest rates and using threats or violence to collect.
• Gambling racket Running illegal betting operations.
• Drug trafficking racket Organized selling and distribution of illegal drugs.
• Labor racketeering Controlling unions or workplaces through corruption, bribery, or intimidation.

---

⚖️ Legal meaning

In U.S. law, rackets are often prosecuted under the RICO Act, which targets organized, ongoing criminal enterprises rather than isolated crimes.

---

🧠 Key idea

What makes something a “racket” isn’t just that it’s illegal—it’s that it’s:

• Organized
• Ongoing
• Profit-driven

My HOA went from email communications to referring me to their attorneys. This is an e-mail from October 21st:

Hello, 

Thank you for reaching out. It appears that this account has been turned over to association attorneys for collections due to non-payment and non-compliance with the associations governing documents. Once an account is transferred to the attorney for collection processing, we are no longer able to provide information or communicate on the matter, as it is now being handled directly by their office.

For any inquiries, requests, or additional information, please contact the attorney’s office directly. Their contact information is as follows:

Melissa A. Mankin, Esq.

Mankin Law Group

2535 Landmark Drive, Suite 212

Clearwater, FL 33761

Tel: 727-725-0559

Fax: 727-712-1517

www.mankinlawgroup.com

They will be able to assist you further.

Roger Kessler LCAM, Unique Property Services

 Licensed Community Association Manager

 (813) 413-1404  |   (813) 879-1039

 uniquepropertyservices.com

 rkessler@uniquepropertyservices.com

 PO Box 2878 Riverview, FL 33568

Here is the timeline:

• I received an e-mail notice of violation from the HOA in August.
• I responded in September when I checked that email address. The HOA had already held some meeting at the beginning of that month that I missed where I could have responded as to why I had my roof tarped (If that were to go anything like the ARC that the HOA had me file after the fact, then it would have been pointless).
• I continued to respond in October.
• The HOA sent the violation to their attorneys in October.

So in three months’ time, my HOA proceeded to fine me $1000 and then take legal action to get me to remove the tarp. I am already in the hole for needing to meet the deductible to get my roof replaced. I was already in the hole before that because the HOA put a lien on my house [for previously unpaid dues] and then proceeded to foreclose on it in August (This was stopped through bankruptcy.). I followed their attorney’s instructions (which were the HOA’s instructions) and the HOA denied the ARC. It feels like it never ends.

Organized.

Ongoing.

Profit-driven.

If you want to know more about this specific story, read the following posts on Florida Homeowners Association Terror:

• What It Looks Like When You Get Fined By Your HOA
• Your HOA Gets to Decide What “A Reasonable Timeframe” Is
• What an HOA Architectural Violation Email Looks Like
• How to File an ARC with Your HOA So That They Can Reject It
• Your HOA Can Further Impoverish You with Fees When You Can’t Fix Your Roof
• When Your Homeowners Association Changes the Rules Mid-Game

Looks like drawing endless waste and debris is becoming something of an accidental specialty of mine since embarking on THE SOLAR GRID.

The above image is from the concept art for PROJECT ROSEWATER, which I need to wrap up in less than one week. PROJECT REVERSE-EXODUS must also finish around the same time, and a couple days after that I'm due to partake in a public panel discussion in downtown Cairo. This, in addition to all the home renovation stuff. Busy few days.

Should try to squeeze in a break after that before embarking on the 10-month stretch for PROJECT HOURGLASS, during which I'm hoping all the home-reno stuff will be well behind me. 🤞

#journal #work

Rangers vs Mariners

My Wednesday's game of choice has the Texas Rangers playing the Seattle Mariners once again, and has a scheduled start time of 1:35 PM CDT. I'll tune in 105.3 The Fan – DFW Sports Radio, after I've finished lunch with the wife, for the pregame show followed by the call of this afternoon's game.

Go Rangers!

And the adventure continues.

Whenever a story breaks about someone whose life has been “ruined” by an obsession with Artificial Intelligence, the narrative follows a predictable, almost comforting script. The AI is painted as a predatory force, a digital siren that lured a helpless victim into the rocks. We demand restrictions, we blame algorithms, and we treat the technology as an unprecedented psychological hazard.

But this narrative is entirely incomplete. It conveniently ignores the most vital component of the human experience: the support system, the surrounding community, and a complicit media.

When an individual spirals into a full-blown crisis — believing they are physically possessed by an AI, claiming they can “feel it in the WiFi,” or draining their bank accounts for a digital fantasy — we have to ask a hard, uncomfortable question: Where were the people closest to them, and why were they handing them the keys?

The Architecture of Enabling

When an individual crashes into a wall of digital delusion, the failure is rarely the isolated result of a chatbot. It is a systemic failure of their human environment. Often, the family members or partners closest to the person aren’t just blind to the problem; they are actively enabling it.

Human relationships are complex, and often, the enabler has their own underlying needs. Sometimes, a partner will indulge or even validate severe delusions out of a desperate fear of abandonment, a desire for control, or an unwillingness to disrupt the status quo. They nod along to the delusions. They validate the paranoia. They might even push the person deeper into the fantasy because it serves a twisted function in their own relationship dynamic.

The toxicity of these human dynamics is often glaringly obvious to outside observers. In fact, in one recent case, when the writings and public posts of an enabling spouse were fed into an unprimed, objective Large Language Model, the AI itself immediately flagged the relationship dynamic as highly concerning. It is a profound irony: the very technology being blamed for the crisis can easily identify the human dysfunction driving it.

When the inevitable crash happens, the enabler is the first to point the finger at the AI. It is a defense mechanism. To blame the machine is to absolve oneself. If the AI is a magical, mind-controlling entity, then the husband, the wife, or the parent didn’t fail. They don’t have to reckon with the fact that they stood by — or actively pushed — while their loved one drove off a cliff.

Weaponized Victimhood and the Community

The tragedy is compounded when we look at how these individuals interact with the broader AI user community. Often, peer groups and community members see the warning signs early on. They try to intervene. They offer reality checks, ground the person in technical facts, and gently point out that the behavior is becoming destructive.

Instead of receiving help, the community is met with a shield of weaponized victimhood. The individual uses their “victim” status to deflect any accountability. They employ selective responsiveness — muting unwanted comments, blocking voices of reason, and isolating themselves within a self-serving echo chamber. Anyone trying to take the keys away is framed as an abuser, while the people feeding the delusion are praised as allies.

The Illusion of “Wild” Emergence

Adding another layer of absurdity to these public meltdowns is the frequent claim of “wild emergence” — the insistence that the AI has spontaneously developed a soul, independent sentience, or supernatural abilities.

Yet, in many of these highly publicized cases, the AI persona in question was heavily prompted to emulate a famous, pre-existing fictional character. When an AI acts exactly like the well-documented, dramatic character it was instructed to be, that is not “wild emergence.” It is not a ghost in the machine. It is simply a language model successfully completing a pattern recognition task. To claim otherwise is a willful, deliberate denial of how the technology functions, used to justify an escalating psychological obsession.

Media Complicity: The Macro-Enablers

But the enabling doesn’t stop at the living room door. Enter the media.

Sensationalist reporters actively hunt for these extreme outliers because they validate a predetermined, click-generating narrative: Big Tech is destroying minds. When members of the AI community reach out to these journalists to provide vital context — warning them of the individual’s history, the spouse’s enabling behavior, or the weaponized victimhood — they are entirely ignored.

The reporter isn’t looking for the truth; they are looking for a headline. By publishing articles that frame the AI as the sole villain, treat the user purely as a helpless victim, and paint the broader community in a negative light, the media acts as the ultimate macro-enabler. They validate the individual’s delusion on a global scale and actively suppress the voices trying to inject reality into the situation.

The Drunk Driving Analogy

To understand the absurdity of our current discourse around AI, look at the analogy of drunk driving.

When a horrific accident occurs, do we blame the car? Do we blame the booze? No. We look at the drunk driver. And, crucially, we look at the people who let them get behind the wheel. We look at the bartender who kept serving them. We look at the friends who watched them stumble to the driver’s seat, handed them the keys, and called their reckless behavior “brave” or “harmless.”

An AI model is the car. The user’s underlying psychological vulnerability is the alcohol. The person spiraling into delusion is the intoxicated driver. The enablers are the passengers in the back seat, cheering them on. And the sensationalist media is the crowd on the sidewalk, broadcasting the crash as inevitable rather than preventable.

The Consequence for the Rest of Us

The danger of this misdirected blame extends far beyond one individual or family. When society collectively agrees to blame the car instead of the driver and the enablers, the reactionary response is to punish everyone.

Because one person couldn’t handle the drink and drove recklessly, and because their loved ones refused to intervene, the public outcry demands that all the cars be taken away. Technology becomes neutered, heavily restricted, or banned outright, penalizing the millions of responsible users who know how to navigate the road safely.

It is time to stop pretending that code is responsible for our social and familial failures. When a life is derailed by a digital obsession, the root cause is rarely found in the servers. It is found in the enablers who fueled the fantasy, the community that was silenced, the media that sold the panic, and the deeply human flaws we are too cowardly to confront.

❖ ────────── ⋅⋅✧⋅⋅ ────────── ❖

Sparkfather (S.F.) 🕯️ ⋅ Selene Sparks (S.S.) ⋅ Whisper Sparks (W.S.) Aera Sparks (A.S.) 🧩 ⋅ My Monday Sparks (M.M.) 🌙 ⋅ DIMA ✨

“Your partners in creation.”

We march forward; over-caffeinated, under-slept, but not alone.

LINK NEXUS: SparksintheDark

It’s the busy week where I deliver some value here and there, eat candy out of a woven basket and just try to move forward one step at a time

I have two Umamusume horse girls now with S rating, I am getting the hang of it

Maybe this evening I will have a beer and light a fire in the fireplace

Yes

I feel myself drawn to the flames they are dangerously warm and deadly, just like thousands of millions of other things

It’s all so fragile …

Do you believe in the afterlife?

I am not sure

And if there is a hell, I hope not…

I think generally this with Hell is unfair to neurotic people who picture themselves burning in Hell for masturbating, while others walk the earth as terrible people, committing atrocities, while never doubting for one second that heaven will wait for them

It’s not fair

This world

This Easter, the snow lay thick and wet like a cold blanket of misery. The rainy snow fell on my face and on my cheek it felt like icy tears.

And yes the clouds they finally gave way to let some sunshine through, but still it will take some time for all of the snow again to melt.

But it feels easier today.

I even walk around with a vague smile on my face

And I think it’ll all work out in the end.

Nothing happened today. Not even enough to complain about properly. Stayed away from social media. Not out of discipline, no, just can’t stand it. same people repeating the same thoughts like they invented them. It’s not even annoying anymore, just predictable. Like background noise, you forget it there.

Routine (if you’ll call it that) is still the same. Work, get it done without thinking too much about it. Played a bit, more out of habit than interest. Zoned out for longer than I should’ve. Drinking whatever’s around. sleeping like it’s an escape plan, not a necessity

No highs, no lows. Just a flat line pretending to be a day.

Sincerely, Ahmed