---

Note : Ce texte présente une analyse générale des enjeux juridiques liés aux ventes immobilières et aux biens patrimoniaux au Québec. Il ne constitue pas une accusation contre une personne ou une organisation, mais un exposé informatif basé sur les lois applicables.

Qu’est-ce qu’un avenant non notarié ?

Un avenant est un addendum ou une modification apportée à un contrat déjà signé. Lorsqu’il est non notarié, il est conclu sous seing privé plutôt que par acte authentique notarié. On parle alors d’une contre-lettre ou de simulation, lorsqu’une entente secrète exprime une volonté différente de celle inscrite dans l’acte officiel¹.

Entre vendeur et acheteur, la contre-lettre prime sur le contrat apparent².

Un avenant non notarié peut servir, par exemple, à modifier le prix réel de vente ou les délais de paiement³. Important : la simulation est permise (art. 1451 CCQ), mais pas si elle sert à frauder ou contourner l’ordre public⁴⁵.

Si l’avenant secret sert à dissimuler un défaut de paiement important, on entre sur un terrain juridique fragile.

---

Un avenant non publié au Registre foncier : manque de transparence et insécurité juridique

Au Québec, les transactions immobilières sont officialisées par un acte notarié inscrit au Registre foncier. Seuls les droits publiés sont opposables aux tiers⁶.

Un avenant secret non publié :

• n’a d’effet qu’entre les parties
• est invisible pour les tiers
• ne peut pas être imposé à d’autres personnes

En cas de conflit, c’est le contrat apparent (celui publié) qui l’emporte⁷⁸.

S’il introduit une condition importante (ex. clause résolutoire), elle aurait dû être publiée⁹. Sans publication, elle est inopposable aux tiers.

Résultat : insécurité juridique. L’entente réelle est dans l’ombre, la protection légale est affaiblie.

---

Quels risques pour le vendeur si l’avenant dissimule un défaut de paiement ?

1. Recours limités en cas de non-paiement

Sans hypothèque légale ni clause résolutoire publiée, le vendeur doit poursuivre l’acheteur en simple contrat privé. Il ne dispose pas d’un titre exécutoire notarié¹⁰. Et si l’acheteur conteste en alléguant fraude : → le tribunal peut ne retenir que l’acte notarié.

2. Perte de protections sur l’immeuble

Sans sûreté publiée :

• une banque ayant accordé une hypothèque passe avant le vendeur
• un acheteur subséquent n’est pas lié par l’avenant secret¹¹

3. Risque d’insolvabilité

Le vendeur devient créancier ordinaire. En faillite, il risque de ne jamais récupérer le solde impayé.

4. Risques fiscaux et légaux

Un prix réel différent du prix déclaré peut être considéré comme une fausse déclaration fiscale. La loi exige de divulguer la contre-lettre aux autorités¹². Pour un site patrimonial, cela peut être perçu comme une manœuvre trompeuse. → Le contrat secret peut être invalidé¹³.

---

Immeuble patrimonial classé : un cas encore plus sensible

Le domaine Médard-Bourgault est un site patrimonial classé. Cela implique des règles particulières.

Droit de préemption du ministère de la Culture

Avant une vente, le ministre doit être avisé 60 jours à l’avance, avec le prix réel et l’acheteur pressenti¹⁴¹⁵.

Le ministre peut acheter le bien au prix communiqué¹⁶.

Si un avenant secret change le prix réel ou les modalités, la vente :

• n’est plus conforme aux conditions transmises
• peut être vue comme une contournement du droit de préemption¹⁷

Cela peut mener à :

• contestation
• enquête
• annulation éventuelle
• atteinte à la réputation

Obligations d’entretien

Toute modification d’un bien classé exige une autorisation ministérielle¹⁸. Un acheteur en difficulté financière (ce qu’un impayé secret laisse entendre) risque :

• d’être incapable d’entretenir le site
• d’entraîner des interventions forcées du ministère¹⁹

Rôle de la municipalité et de la communauté

Une transaction opaque dans un dossier patrimonial :

• brise la confiance
• complique l’accès aux subventions
• nuit à la planification culturelle locale

---

Lois applicables : que dit le cadre juridique ?

Code civil du Québec (CCQ)

• art. 1451 : simulation et contre-lettre²⁰
• art. 1452 : tiers de bonne foi privilégiés²¹
• art. 2938+ : publicité des droits²²
• art. 2941 : seul le droit publié est opposable²³
• clauses résolutoires doivent être publiées

Loi sur le patrimoine culturel (LPC)

Articles pertinents :

• art. 54 à 58 : droit de préemption, délai 60 jours²⁴
• art. 57 : la vente doit être au prix communiqué²⁵
• art. 48 : aucune modification sans autorisation²⁶

Registre foncier du Québec

• un avenant privé ne peut être publié tel quel
• doit être transformé en acte notarié
• absence de publication = aucune protection²⁷

---

Conclusion – Informer sans juger

L’affaire du domaine Médard-Bourgault montre les risques d’un avenant secret :

• risque financier pour le vendeur
• risque juridique majeur
• risque fiscal
• risque patrimonial
• risque pour la communauté

La vente d’un bien patrimonial exige transparence, rigueur, et respect du cadre légal.

---

Sources (liens cliquables)

1. Pouvons-nous légalement utiliser une contre-lettre ? – Dubé Latreille

2. La contre-lettre en immobilier – JuriGo.ca

3. Code civil du Québec – Légis Québec

4. Saisie immobilière et avenant privé – Lexbase

5. Bien patrimonial classé : droit de préemption – OACIQ

6. Loi sur le patrimoine culturel – OACIQ

7. Le Registre foncier du Québec – OACIQ

---

Un autodidacte enraciné dans le Québec rural et catholique

Médard Bourgault (1897–1967) est un sculpteur québécois autodidacte originaire de Saint-Jean-Port-Joli, un village rural catholique sur la côte du Saint-Laurent(1). Issu d’une famille modeste de menuisiers et de marins, il apprend la sculpture sur bois par lui-même, en puisant dans le savoir-faire artisanal de sa communauté. Jeune homme, il est encouragé par un sculpteur local au canif (Arthur Fournier) puis remarqué en 1930 par l’anthropologue Marius Barbeau, qui lui achète des pièces et le fait connaître aux milieux culturels(2). Grâce à cette reconnaissance et à l’essor du tourisme le long du Saint-Laurent pendant la Grande Dépression, Bourgault commence à vendre ses sculptures aux visiteurs de passage, installant même un étal devant sa maison pour écouler ses œuvres(3). Rapidement, ses scènes sculptées de la vie traditionnelle séduisent le public : il reçoit un nombre impressionnant de commandes qui l’obligent à améliorer et adapter son style tout en conservant son indépendance(4). Avec ses frères André et Jean-Julien – également sculpteurs –, il forme des apprentis et contribue à faire de Saint-Jean-Port-Joli la « capitale de la sculpture sur bois » au Québec(5).

Bourgault est profondément ancré dans le Québec catholique du XXᵉ siècle, à une époque où l’Église et les traditions rurales rythment la vie quotidienne. Sa foi personnelle est intense : très tôt, il décide de se consacrer à l’art religieux pour répondre aux besoins de l’Église tout en exprimant sa propre spiritualité(6). Pendant plus de trente ans, ses sculptures témoignent de sa foi profonde, trouvant place dans de nombreuses églises et chapelles de la province. Cette double identité – artiste paysan autodidacte et croyant fervent – définit le parcours de Bourgault et la singularité de son œuvre. Profondément enraciné dans son terroir, il puise son inspiration dans la vie de la campagne québécoise et la dévotion catholique, tout en aspirant à une expression artistique universelle.

Des scènes de foi, de mer et de vie quotidienne sculptées dans le bois

Les thèmes de prédilection de Médard Bourgault reflètent son milieu et ses croyances. Ses premières œuvres s’inspirent du quotidien rural qu’il observe autour de lui : familles de fermiers, bûcherons au travail, scènes de la vie des champs, attelages de bœufs, chiens de ferme, etc.(7). Il affectionne aussi les sujets liés à la mer et à la navigation, héritage de son passé de marin. Par exemple, il représente des pêcheurs gaspésiens tirant leurs filets pleins de poissons, ou des capitaines de goélettes en imperméable affrontant le vent du fleuve(8). Une de ces scènes maritimes est le bas-relief La pêche (1961) – une grande composition en pin où trois pêcheurs halent un lourd filet à bord de leur embarcation, sous le vol des goélands(9). À travers ces personnages marins et paysans, Bourgault rend hommage aux métiers traditionnels et à la vie simple du Québec rural du milieu du XXᵉ siècle.

En parallèle, et de plus en plus avec le temps, Bourgault se tourne vers les sujets religieux dictés par sa foi catholique. Il sculpte de nombreuses représentations de la Vierge Marie (par exemple Notre-Dame des blés ou Notre-Dame des flots) ainsi que des scènes tirées de la Bible et de la vie des saints(10).

Surtout, il excelle dans la réalisation de chemins de croix : ces suites de quatorze bas-reliefs illustrant la Passion du Christ sont très demandées par les paroisses en expansion dans les années 1940-50(11). Ses chemins de croix en bois sculpté ornent ainsi plusieurs églises du Québec (chapelle des Jésuites à Québec, église de Saint-Jean-Port-Joli, etc.) et même des communautés religieuses hors province(12). Cette production sacrée – Vierges à l’enfant, crucifix, statues de saints, etc. – occupe une place centrale dans son œuvre, portée par sa foi intense et par le besoin des églises locales en art religieux(13).

Qu’il représente un paysan semant son champ ou le Christ tombant sous la Croix, Bourgault travaille essentiellement le bois (tilleul, pin ou noyer) qu’il sculpte en ronde-bosse ou en haut-relief. Il pratique la taille directe, sans moule ni modèle intermédiaire, s’attaquant au bloc de bois avec ses gouges et ciseaux. Cette approche artisanale confère à ses pièces un caractère brut et vivant, où la texture du bois et les traces d’outil participent à l’esthétique. Le matériau chaleureux du bois, souvent rehaussé de polychromie dans ses premières œuvres(14), s’accorde bien aux scènes populaires et religieuses qu’il dépeint, leur donnant une présence organique particulière.

Une technique sincère et une foi profonde au service de l’émotion

Malgré son étiquette d’« artiste d’art populaire », Médard Bourgault développe une technique et un style capables de véhiculer une intense charge émotionnelle. Son statut d’autodidacte, loin d’être un frein, lui permet de sculpter avec sincérité, en dehors des conventions académiques. Il observe attentivement ses sujets – qu’il s’agisse d’un laboureur ou du Christ en croix – et en extrait l’essence expressive plutôt que le détail académique. Ses œuvres privilégient la force des attitudes et des expressions sur la précision anatomique. Comme Rodin l’affirmait lui-même : « Un bon sculpteur (…) ne représente pas seulement la musculature, mais aussi la vie qui les réchauffe. »(15)

La spiritualité de Bourgault est un moteur essentiel de son art. Ses Christ en croix, ses Vierges et ses saints expriment une piété tangible et une humanité qui touchent le spectateur. Cette dimension spirituelle sincère donne à son travail une gravité et une profondeur d’émotion peu communes dans l’art dit « naïf ». Ses grands reliefs sont « très touchants et témoignent d’une grande sincérité en regard de la vie et de la société »(16).

Sur le plan de la composition, Bourgault fait preuve d’une inventivité remarquable pour un artiste non formé aux Beaux-Arts. Dans ses bas-reliefs narratifs, il utilise la profondeur, la perspective, le dynamisme. Dans ses chemins de croix, l’agencement des personnages crée une dramaturgie poignante. Dans son grand cycle de panneaux sur l’« identité québécoise » – Le berceau d’une race, Le défricheur, La forge, Le fardeau des guerres, etc. – il compose une véritable épopée visuelle(17). Réalisé durant la Seconde Guerre mondiale, ce cycle marie tradition et modernité(18).

Des œuvres d’une expressivité magistrale, dignes des grands maîtres

Chemins de croix

Parmi les plus frappants exemples : les chemins de croix sculptés pour la chapelle des Jésuites (Québec) ou Caraquet. La station Jésus meurt sur la croix (12ᵉ) montre le Christ la tête inclinée vers sa mère, composition d’une grande intensité(19). L’un de ses chemins de croix, commandé en 1948, attira l’attention d’architectes et de connaisseurs d’art sacré(20).

Le fardeau des guerres (1943)

Haut-relief en pin, souvent considéré comme son chef-d’œuvre moderne : un homme courbé sous un faisceau d’armes symbolisant la souffrance collective. Des experts affirment que l’œuvre « cadrerait bien avec les pièces d’autres grands maîtres » dans un musée d’art moderne(21). Elle partage une force expressive comparable à Rodin.

Statues mariales

Parmi ses pièces majeures : • Notre-Dame des flots (1943), acquise par le Musée du Québec(22) • Notre-Dame des habitants (Vierge à la gerbe de blé), sélectionnée par Marius Barbeau dans The World’s Great Madonnas aux côtés de Michel-Ange et Raphaël(23)

Reconnaissance et hiérarchies : Rodin vs Bourgault

Rodin (1840–1917) fut reconnu internationalement, célébré, honoré, muséifié(24)(25).

Bourgault, autodidacte rural, connut surtout une reconnaissance régionale(26)(27). Ses œuvres étaient recherchées, les journaux parlaient de lui, les dignitaires visitaient son atelier, mais il resta classé dans l’« art populaire ».

La hiérarchie culturelle privilégiait les artistes formés en milieu urbain. Pourtant, Bourgault tenta, à la fin de sa vie, des sujets académiques tels que Les Trois Grâces ou Le baiser d’adieu(28)(29).

Redécouvrir Bourgault

Il est temps de considérer Bourgault comme une contribution artistique de portée universelle. Son œuvre transcende son milieu et rejoint des thématiques humaines profondes. Elle montre que l’art populaire peut atteindre une expressivité égale à l’art « cultivé ». Ses sculptures voyagent aujourd’hui dans le monde entier(30).

En replaçant Bourgault aux côtés de Rodin, on affirme que l’émotion artistique n’a pas de passeport.

Sources

Yves Hébert, « Médard Bourgault, pionnier de la sculpture sur bois », Le Placoteux, 5 février 2024. Jean-François Blanchette, Médard Bourgault et ses héritiers – Un siècle de sculpture à Saint-Jean-Port-Joli, Société québécoise d’ethnologie, 2023. Jean-François Blanchette, « Médard Bourgault, maître d’art, 1930–1967 », Société québécoise d’ethnologie, 2021. Répertoire du patrimoine culturel du Québec, fiches « Bas-relief (La pêche) » et « Station de chemin de croix (Jésus meurt sur la croix) ». Wikipédia, article « Médard Bourgault » (consulté en 2025). Musée des beaux-arts du Canada, notice « Auguste Rodin ». Ethnologie du Québec, « Les Trois Bérets et les ateliers de sculpture de Saint-Jean-Port-Joli », Rabatka, vol. 18, 2020.

1. https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medard_Bourgault

2. https://ethnologiequebec.org/2021/04/medard-bourgault-maitre-dart-1930-1967/

3. https://leplacoteux.com/medard-bourgault-pionnier-de-la-sculpture-sur-bois/

4. https://www.septentrion.qc.ca/catalogue/medard-bourgault-et-ses-heritiers

5. https://www.patrimoine-culturel.gouv.qc.ca/rpcq/detail.do?methode=consulter&id=234672&type=bien

6. https://www.patrimoine-culturel.gouv.qc.ca/rpcq/detail.do?methode=consulter&id=231290&type=bien

7. https://www.beaux-arts.ca/collection/artiste/auguste-rodin

In Mesa, Arizona, city officials approved an $800 million data centre development in the midst of the driest 12 months the region had seen in 126 years. The facility would gulp up to 1.25 million gallons of water daily, enough to supply a town of 50,000 people. Meanwhile, just miles away, state authorities were revoking construction permits for new homes because groundwater had run dry. The juxtaposition wasn't lost on residents: their taps might run empty whilst servers stayed cool.

This is the sharp edge of artificial intelligence's environmental paradox. As AI systems proliferate globally, the infrastructure supporting them has become one of the most resource-intensive industries on the planet. Yet most people interacting with ChatGPT or generating images with Midjourney have no idea that each query leaves a physical footprint measured in litres and kilowatt-hours.

The numbers paint a sobering picture. In 2023, United States data centres consumed 17 billion gallons of water directly through cooling systems, according to a 2024 report from the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. That figure could double or even quadruple by 2028. Add the 211 billion gallons consumed indirectly through electricity generation, and the total water footprint becomes staggering. To put it in tangible terms: between 10 and 50 interactions with ChatGPT cause a data centre to consume half a litre of water.

On the carbon side, data centres produced 140.7 megatons of CO2 in 2024, requiring 6.4 gigatons of trees to absorb. By 2030, these facilities may consume between 4.6 and 9.1 per cent of total U.S. electricity generation, up from an estimated 4 per cent in 2024. Morgan Stanley projects that AI-optimised data centres will quadruple their electricity consumption, with global emissions rising from 200 million metric tons currently to 600 million tons annually by 2030.

The crisis is compounded by a transparency problem that borders on the Kafkaesque. Analysis by The Guardian found that actual emissions from data centres owned by Google, Microsoft, Meta and Apple were likely around 7.62 times greater than officially reported between 2020 and 2022. The discrepancy stems from creative accounting: firms claim carbon neutrality by purchasing renewable energy credits whilst their actual local emissions, generated by drawing power from carbon-intensive grids, go unreported or downplayed.

Meta's 2022 data centre operations illustrate the shell game perfectly. Using market-based accounting with purchased credits, the company reported a mere 273 metric tons of CO2. Calculate emissions using the actual grid mix that powered those facilities, however, and the figure balloons to over 3.8 million metric tons. It's the corporate equivalent of claiming you've gone vegetarian because you bought someone else's salad.

The Opacity Economy

The lack of consistent, mandatory reporting creates an information vacuum that serves industry interests whilst leaving policymakers, communities and the public flying blind. Companies rarely disclose how much water their data centres consume. When pressed, they point to aggregate sustainability reports that blend data centre impacts with other operations, making it nearly impossible to isolate the true footprint of AI infrastructure.

This opacity isn't accidental. Without standardised metrics or mandatory disclosure requirements in most jurisdictions, companies can cherry-pick flattering data. They can report power usage effectiveness (PUE), a metric that measures energy efficiency but says nothing about absolute consumption. They can trumpet renewable energy purchases without mentioning that those credits often come from wind farms hundreds of miles away, whilst the data centre itself runs on a coal-heavy grid.

Even where data exists, comparing facilities becomes an exercise in frustration. One operator might report annual water consumption, another might report it per megawatt of capacity, and a third might not report it at all. Carbon emissions face similar inconsistencies: some companies report only Scope 1 and 2 emissions whilst conveniently omitting Scope 3 (supply chain and embodied carbon in construction).

The stakes are profound. Communities weighing whether to approve new developments lack data to assess true environmental trade-offs. Policymakers can't benchmark reasonable standards without knowing current baselines. Investors attempting to evaluate ESG risks make decisions based on incomplete figures. Consumers have no way to make informed choices.

The European Union's revised Energy Efficiency Directive, which came into force in 2024, requires data centres with power demand above 500 kilowatts to report energy and water usage annually to a publicly accessible database. The first reports, covering calendar year 2023, were due by 15 September 2024. The Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive adds another layer, requiring large companies to disclose sustainability policies, greenhouse gas reduction goals, and detailed emissions data across all scopes starting with 2024 data reported in 2025.

The data collected includes floor area, installed power, data volumes processed, total energy consumption, PUE ratings, temperature set points, waste heat utilisation, water usage metrics, and renewable energy percentages. This granular information will provide the first comprehensive picture of European data centre environmental performance.

These mandates represent progress, but they're geographically limited and face implementation challenges. Compliance requires sophisticated monitoring systems that many operators lack. Verification mechanisms remain unclear. And crucially, the regulations focus primarily on disclosure rather than setting hard limits. You can emit as much as you like, provided you admit to it.

The Water Crisis Intensifies

Water consumption presents particular urgency because data centres are increasingly being built in regions already facing water stress. Analysis by Bloomberg found that more than 160 new AI data centres have appeared across the United States in the past three years in areas with high competition for scarce water resources, a 70 per cent increase from the prior three-year period. In some cases, data centres use over 25 per cent of local community water supplies.

Northern Virginia's Loudoun County, home to the world's greatest concentration of data centres covering an area equivalent to 100,000 football fields, exemplifies the pressure. Data centres serviced by the Loudoun water utility increased their drinking water use by more than 250 per cent between 2019 and 2023. When the region suffered a monthslong drought in 2024, data centres continued operating at full capacity, pulling millions of gallons daily whilst residents faced conservation restrictions.

The global pattern repeats with numbing regularity. In Uruguay, communities protested unsustainable water use during drought recovery. In Chile, facilities tap directly into drinking water reservoirs. In Aragon, Spain, demonstrators marched under the slogan “Your cloud is drying my river.” The irony is acute: the digital clouds we imagine as ethereal abstractions are, in physical reality, draining literal rivers.

Traditional data centre cooling relies on evaporative systems that spray water over heat exchangers or cooling towers. As warm air passes through, water evaporates, carrying heat away. It's thermodynamically efficient but water-intensive by design. Approximately 80 per cent of water withdrawn by data centres evaporates, with the remaining 20 per cent discharged to municipal wastewater facilities, often contaminated with cooling chemicals and minerals.

On average, a data centre uses approximately 300,000 gallons of water per day. Large facilities can consume 5 million gallons daily. An Iowa data centre consumed 1 billion gallons in 2024, enough to supply all of Iowa's residential water for five days.

The water demands become even more acute when considering that AI workloads generate significantly more heat than traditional computing. Training a single large language model can require weeks of intensive computation across thousands of processors. As AI capabilities expand and model sizes grow, the cooling challenge intensifies proportionally.

Google's water consumption has increased by nearly 88 per cent since 2019, primarily driven by data centre expansion. Amazon's emissions rose to 68.25 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent in 2024, a 6 per cent increase from the previous year and the company's first emissions rise since 2021. Microsoft's greenhouse gas emissions for 2023 were 29.1 per cent higher than its 2020 baseline, directly contradicting the company's stated climate ambitions.

These increases come despite public commitments to the contrary. Before the AI boom, Amazon, Microsoft and Google all pledged to cut their carbon footprints and become water-positive by 2030. Microsoft President Brad Smith has acknowledged that the company's AI push has made it “four times more difficult” to achieve carbon-negative goals by the target date, though he maintains the commitment stands. The admission raises uncomfortable questions about whether corporate climate pledges will be abandoned when they conflict with profitable growth opportunities.

Alternative Technologies and Their Trade-offs

The good news is that alternatives exist. The challenge is scaling them economically whilst navigating complex trade-offs between water use, energy consumption and practicality.

Closed-loop liquid cooling systems circulate water or specialised coolants through a closed circuit that never evaporates. Water flows directly to servers via cold plates or heat exchangers, absorbs heat, returns to chillers where it's cooled, then circulates again. Once filled during construction, the system requires minimal water replenishment.

Microsoft has begun deploying closed-loop, chip-level liquid cooling systems that eliminate evaporative water use entirely, reducing annual consumption by more than 125 million litres per facility. Research suggests closed-loop systems can reduce freshwater use by 50 to 70 per cent compared to traditional evaporative cooling.

The trade-off? Energy consumption. Closed-loop systems typically use 10 to 30 per cent more electricity to power chillers than evaporative systems, which leverage the thermodynamic efficiency of phase change. You can save water but increase your carbon footprint, or vice versa. Optimising both simultaneously requires careful engineering and higher capital costs.

Immersion cooling submerges entire servers in tanks filled with non-conductive dielectric fluids, providing extremely efficient heat transfer. Companies like Iceotope and LiquidStack are pioneering commercial immersion cooling solutions that can handle the extreme heat densities generated by AI accelerators. The fluids are expensive, however, and retrofitting existing data centres is impractical.

Purple pipe systems use reclaimed wastewater for cooling instead of potable water. Data centres can embrace the energy efficiency of evaporative cooling whilst preserving drinking water supplies. In 2023, Loudoun Water in Virginia delivered 815 million gallons of reclaimed water to customers, primarily data centres, saving an equivalent amount of potable water. Expanding purple pipe infrastructure requires coordination between operators, utilities and governments, plus capital investment in dual piping systems.

Geothermal cooling methods such as aquifer thermal energy storage and deep lake water cooling utilise natural cooling from the earth's thermal mass. Done properly, they consume negligible water and require minimal energy for pumping. Geographic constraints limit deployment; you need the right geology or proximity to deep water bodies. Northern European countries with abundant groundwater and cold climates are particularly well-suited to these approaches.

Hybrid approaches are emerging that combine multiple technologies. X-Cooling, a system under development by industry collaborators, blends ambient air cooling with closed-loop liquid cooling to eliminate water use whilst optimising energy efficiency. Proponents estimate it could save 1.2 million tons of water annually for every 100 megawatts of capacity.

The crucial question isn't whether alternatives exist but rather what incentives or requirements will drive adoption at scale. Left to market forces alone, operators will default to whatever maximises their economic returns, which typically means conventional evaporative cooling using subsidised water.

The Policy Patchwork

Global policy responses remain fragmented and inconsistent, ranging from ambitious mandatory reporting in the European Union to virtually unregulated expansion in many developing nations.

The EU leads in regulatory ambition. The Climate Neutral Data Centre Pact has secured commitments from operators responsible for more than 90 per cent of European data centre capacity to achieve climate neutrality by 2030. Signatories include Amazon Web Services, Google, Microsoft, IBM, Intel, Digital Realty, Equinix and dozens of others. As of 1 January 2025, new data centres in cold climates must meet an annual PUE target of 1.3 (current industry average is 1.58), effectively mandating advanced cooling technologies.

The enforcement mechanisms and penalties for non-compliance remain somewhat nebulous, however. The pact is voluntary; signatories can theoretically withdraw if requirements become inconvenient. The reporting requirements create transparency but don't impose hard caps on consumption or emissions. This reflects the EU's broader regulatory philosophy of transparency and voluntary compliance before moving to mandatory limits, a gradualist approach that critics argue allows environmental damage to continue whilst bureaucracies debate enforcement mechanisms.

Asia-Pacific countries are pursuing varied approaches that reflect different priorities and governmental structures. Singapore launched its Green Data Centre Roadmap in May 2024, aiming to grow capacity sustainably through green energy and energy-efficient technology, with plans to introduce standards for energy-efficient IT equipment and liquid cooling by 2025. The city-state, facing severe land and resource constraints, has strong incentives to maximise efficiency per square metre.

China announced plans to decrease the average PUE of its data centres to less than 1.5 by 2025, with renewable energy utilisation increasing by 10 per cent annually. Given China's massive data centre buildout to support domestic tech companies and government digitalisation initiatives, achieving these targets would represent a significant environmental improvement. Implementation and verification remain questions, however, particularly in a regulatory environment where transparency is limited.

Malaysia and Singapore have proposed mandatory sustainability reporting starting in 2025, with Hong Kong, South Korea and Taiwan targeting 2026. Japan's Financial Services Agency is developing a sustainability disclosure standard similar to the EU's CSRD, potentially requiring reporting from 2028. This regional convergence towards mandatory disclosure suggests a recognition that voluntary approaches have proven insufficient.

In the United States, much regulatory action occurs at the state level, creating a complex patchwork of requirements that vary dramatically by jurisdiction. California's Senate Bill 253, the Climate Corporate Data Accountability Act, represents one of the most aggressive state-level requirements, mandating detailed climate disclosures from large companies operating in the state. Virginia, which hosts the greatest concentration of U.S. data centres, has seen a flood of legislative activity. In 2025 legislative sessions, 113 bills across 30 states addressed data centres, with Virginia alone considering 28 bills covering everything from tax incentives to water usage restrictions.

Virginia's House Bill 1601, which would have mandated environmental impact assessments on water usage for proposed data centres, was vetoed by Governor Glenn Youngkin in May 2024, highlighting the political tension between attracting economic investment and managing environmental impacts.

Some states are attaching sustainability requirements to tax incentives, attempting to balance economic development with environmental protection. Virginia requires data centres to source at least 90 per cent of energy from carbon-free renewable sources beginning in 2027 to qualify for tax credits. Illinois requires data centres to become carbon-neutral within two years of being placed into service to receive incentives. Michigan extended incentives through 2050 (and 2065 for redevelopment sites) whilst tying benefits to brownfield and former power plant locations, encouraging reuse of previously developed land.

Oregon has proposed particularly stringent penalties: a bill requiring data centres to reduce carbon emissions by 60 per cent by 2027, with non-compliance resulting in fines of $12,000 per megawatt-hour per day. Minnesota eliminated electricity tax relief for data centres whilst adding steep annual fees and enforcing wage and sustainability requirements. Kansas launched a 20-year sales tax exemption requiring $250 million in capital investment and 20-plus jobs, setting a high bar for qualification.

The trend is towards conditions-based incentives rather than blanket tax breaks. States recognise they have leverage at the approval stage and are using it to extract sustainability commitments. The challenge is ensuring those commitments translate into verified performance over time.

At the federal level, bicameral lawmakers introduced the Artificial Intelligence Environmental Impacts Act in early 2024, directing the EPA to study AI's environmental footprint and develop measurement standards and a voluntary reporting system. The legislation remains in committee, stalled by partisan disagreements and industry lobbying.

Incentives, Penalties and What Might Actually Work

The question of what policy mechanisms can genuinely motivate operators to prioritise environmental stewardship requires grappling with economic realities. Data centre operators respond to incentives like any business: they'll adopt sustainable practices when profitable, required by regulation, or necessary to maintain social licence to operate.

Voluntary initiatives have demonstrated that good intentions alone are insufficient. Microsoft, Google and Amazon all committed to aggressive climate goals, yet their emissions trajectories are headed in the wrong direction. Without binding requirements and verification, corporate sustainability pledges function primarily as marketing.

Carbon pricing represents one economically efficient approach: make operators pay for emissions and let market forces drive efficiency. The challenge is setting prices high enough to drive behaviour change without crushing industry competitiveness. Coordinated international carbon pricing would solve the competitiveness problem but remains politically unlikely.

Water pricing faces similar dynamics. In many jurisdictions, industrial water is heavily subsidised or priced below its scarcity value. Tiered pricing offers a middle path: charge below-market rates for baseline consumption but impose premium prices for usage above certain thresholds. Couple this with seasonal adjustments that raise prices during drought conditions, and you create dynamic incentives aligned with actual scarcity.

Performance standards sidestep pricing politics by prohibiting construction or operation of facilities exceeding specified PUE, WUE or CUE thresholds. Singapore's approach exemplifies this strategy. The downside is rigidity: standards lock in specific technologies, potentially excluding innovations that achieve environmental goals through different means.

Mandatory disclosure with verification might be the most immediately viable path. Require operators to report standardised metrics on energy and water consumption, carbon emissions across all scopes, cooling technologies deployed, and renewable energy percentages. Mandate third-party audits. Make all data publicly accessible.

Transparency creates accountability through multiple channels. Investors can evaluate ESG risks. Communities can assess impacts before approving developments. Media and advocacy groups can spotlight poor performers, creating reputational pressure. And the data provides policymakers the foundation to craft evidence-based regulations.

The EU's Energy Efficiency Directive and CSRD represent this approach. The United States could adopt similar federal requirements, building on the EPA's proposed AI Environmental Impacts Act but making reporting mandatory. The iMasons Climate Accord has called for “nutrition labels” on data centres detailing sustainability outcomes.

The key is aligning financial incentives with environmental outcomes whilst maintaining flexibility for innovation. A portfolio approach combining mandatory disclosure, performance standards for new construction, carbon and water pricing reflecting scarcity, financial incentives for superior performance, and penalties for egregious behaviour would create multiple reinforcing pressures.

International coordination would amplify effectiveness. If major economic blocs adopted comparable standards and reporting requirements, operators couldn't simply relocate to the most permissive jurisdiction. Getting international agreement is difficult, but precedents exist. The Montreal Protocol successfully addressed ozone depletion through coordinated regulation. Data centre impacts are more tractable than civilisational-scale challenges like total decarbonisation.

The Community Dimension

Lost in discussions of megawatts and PUE scores are the communities where data centres locate. These facilities occupy physical land, draw from local water tables, connect to regional grids, and compete with residents for finite resources.

Chandler, Arizona provides an instructive case. In 2015, the city passed an ordinance restricting water-intensive businesses that don't create many jobs, effectively deterring data centres. The decision reflected citizen priorities: in a desert experiencing its worst drought in recorded history, consuming millions of gallons daily to cool servers whilst generating minimal employment wasn't an acceptable trade-off.

Other communities have made different calculations, viewing data centres as economic assets despite environmental costs. The decision often depends on how transparent operators are about impacts and how equitably costs and benefits are distributed.

Best practices are emerging. Some operators fund water infrastructure improvements that benefit entire communities. Others prioritise hiring locally and invest in training programmes. Procurement of renewable energy, if done locally through power purchase agreements with regional projects, can accelerate clean energy transitions. Waste heat recovery systems that redirect data centre heat to district heating networks or greenhouses turn a liability into a resource.

Proactive engagement should be a prerequisite for approval. Require developers to conduct and publicly release comprehensive environmental impact assessments. Hold public hearings where citizens can question operators and independent technical experts. Make approval contingent on binding community benefit agreements that specify environmental performance, local hiring commitments, infrastructure investments and ongoing reporting.

Too often, data centre approvals happen through opaque processes dominated by economic development offices eager to announce investment figures. By the time residents learn details, decisions are fait accompli. Shifting to participatory processes would slow approvals but produce more sustainable and equitable outcomes.

Rewiring the System

Addressing the environmental crisis created by AI data centres requires action across multiple domains simultaneously. The essential elements include:

Mandatory, standardised reporting globally. Require all data centres above a specified capacity threshold to annually report detailed metrics on energy consumption, water usage, carbon emissions across all scopes, cooling technologies, renewable energy percentages, and waste heat recovery. Mandate third-party verification and public accessibility through centralised databases.

Performance requirements for new construction tied to local environmental conditions. Water-scarce regions should prohibit evaporative cooling unless using reclaimed water. Areas with carbon-intensive grids should require on-site renewable generation. Cold climates should mandate ambitious PUE targets.

Pricing water and carbon to reflect scarcity and social cost. Eliminate subsidies that make waste economically rational. Implement tiered pricing that charges premium rates for consumption above baselines. Use seasonal adjustments to align prices with real-time conditions.

Strategic financial incentives to accelerate adoption of superior technologies. Offer tax credits for closed-loop cooling, immersion systems, waste heat recovery, and on-site renewable generation. Establish significant penalties for non-compliance, including fines and potential revocation of operating licences.

Investment in alternative cooling infrastructure at scale. Expand purple pipe systems in areas with data centre concentrations. Support geothermal system development where geology permits. Fund research into novel cooling technologies.

Reformed approval processes ensuring community voice. Require comprehensive impact assessments, public hearings and community benefit agreements before approval. Give local governments authority to impose conditions or reject proposals based on environmental capacity.

International coordination through diplomatic channels and trade agreements. Develop consensus standards and mutual recognition agreements. Use trade policy to discourage environmental dumping. Support technology transfer and capacity building in developing nations.

Demand-side solutions through research into more efficient AI architectures, better model compression and edge computing that distributes processing closer to users. Finally, cultivate cultural and corporate norm shifts where sustainability becomes as fundamental to data centre operations as uptime and security.

When the Cloud Touches Ground

The expansion of AI-powered data centres represents a collision between humanity's digital aspirations and planetary physical limits. We've constructed infrastructure that treats water and energy as infinitely abundant whilst generating carbon emissions incompatible with climate stability.

Communities are already pushing back. Aquifers are declining. Grids are straining. The “just build more” mentality is encountering limits, and those limits will only tighten as climate change intensifies water scarcity and energy systems decarbonise. The question is whether we'll address these constraints proactively through thoughtful policy or reactively through crisis-driven restrictions.

The technologies to build sustainable AI infrastructure exist. Closed-loop cooling can eliminate water consumption. Renewable energy can power operations carbon-free. Efficient design can minimise energy waste. The question is whether policy frameworks, economic incentives and social pressures will align to drive adoption before constraints force more disruptive responses.

Brad Smith's acknowledgment that AI has made Microsoft's climate goals “four times more difficult” is admirably honest but deeply inadequate as a policy response. The answer cannot be to accept that AI requires abandoning climate commitments. It must be to ensure AI development occurs within environmental boundaries through regulation, pricing and technological innovation.

Sustainable AI infrastructure is technically feasible. What's required is political will to impose requirements, market mechanisms to align incentives, transparency to enable accountability, and international cooperation to prevent a race to the bottom. None of these elements exist sufficiently today, which is why emissions rise whilst pledges multiply.

The data centres sprouting across water-stressed regions aren't abstract nodes in a cloud; they're physical installations making concrete claims on finite resources. Every litre consumed, every kilowatt drawn, every ton of carbon emitted represents a choice. We can continue making those choices unconsciously, allowing market forces to prioritise private profit over collective sustainability. Or we can choose deliberately, through democratic processes and informed by transparent data, to ensure the infrastructure powering our digital future doesn't compromise our environmental future.

The residents of Mesa, Arizona, watching data centres rise whilst their wells run dry, deserve better. So do communities worldwide facing the same calculus. The question isn't whether we can build sustainable AI infrastructure. It's whether we will, and the answer depends on whether policymakers, operators and citizens decide that environmental stewardship isn't negotiable, even when the stakes are measured in terabytes and training runs.

The technology sector has repeatedly demonstrated capacity for extraordinary innovation when properly motivated. Carbon-free data centres are vastly simpler than quantum computing or artificial general intelligence. What's lacking isn't capability but commitment. Building that commitment through robust regulation, meaningful incentives and uncompromising transparency isn't anti-technology; it's ensuring technology serves humanity rather than undermining the environmental foundations civilisation requires.

The cloud must not dry the rivers. The servers must not drain the wells. These aren't metaphors; they're material realities. Addressing them requires treating data centre environmental impacts with the seriousness they warrant: as a central challenge of sustainable technology development in the 21st century, demanding comprehensive policy responses, substantial investment and unwavering accountability.

The path forward is clear. Whether we take it depends on choices made in legislative chambers, corporate boardrooms, investor evaluations and community meetings worldwide. The infrastructure powering artificial intelligence must itself become more intelligent, operating within planetary boundaries rather than exceeding them. That transformation won't happen spontaneously. It requires us to build it, deliberately and urgently, before the wells run dry.

---

Sources and References

1. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. (2024). “2024 United States Data Center Energy Usage Report.” https://eta.lbl.gov/publications/2024-lbnl-data-center-energy-usage-report

2. The Guardian. (2024). Analysis of data centre emissions reporting by Google, Microsoft, Meta and Apple.

3. Bloomberg. (2025). “The AI Boom Is Draining Water From the Areas That Need It Most.” https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2025-ai-impacts-data-centers-water-data/

4. European Commission. (2024). Energy Efficiency Directive and Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive implementation documentation.

5. Climate Neutral Data Centre Pact. (2024). Signatory list and certification documentation. https://www.climateneutraldatacentre.net/

6. Microsoft. (2025). Environmental Sustainability Report. Published by Brad Smith, Vice Chair and President, and Melanie Nakagawa, Chief Sustainability Officer.

7. Morgan Stanley. (2024). Analysis of AI-optimised data centre electricity consumption and emissions projections.

8. NBC News. (2021). “Drought-stricken communities push back against data centers.”

9. NPR. (2022). “Data centers, backbone of the digital economy, face water scarcity and climate risk.”

10. Various state legislative documents: Virginia HB 1601, California SB 253, Oregon data centre emissions reduction bill, Illinois carbon neutrality requirements.

---

Tim Green UK-based Systems Theorist & Independent Technology Writer

Tim explores the intersections of artificial intelligence, decentralised cognition, and posthuman ethics. His work, published at smarterarticles.co.uk, challenges dominant narratives of technological progress while proposing interdisciplinary frameworks for collective intelligence and digital stewardship.

His writing has been featured on Ground News and shared by independent researchers across both academic and technological communities.

ORCID: 0009-0002-0156-9795 Email: tim@smarterarticles.co.uk

I am just me. Ben. I have had beginnings. Birth. Graduations. Marriage. Parent. This is my last beginning. I will navigate on my terms and at my pace which will be to look, listen, feel what is in my face. Then adapt. Strait up, regular, me.

In Summary: * A pretty good Wednesday. The Retina Doc phoned me this morning and we had a constructive conversation. We have an appointment set for mid-February where he'll look at both my eyes (again) and we may begin standard treatment on my right eye at that time.

Prayers, etc.: * My daily prayers.

Health Metrics: * bw= 221.79 lbs. * bp= 138/77 (68)

Exercise: * kegel pelvic floor exercise, half squats, calf raises, wall push-ups

Diet: * 06:00 – pizza, peanut butter sandwich * 12:20 – 1 ham & cheese sandwich, fried eggplant * 15:50 – 1 fresh apple, crispy oatmeal cookies

Activities, Chores, etc.: * 04:00 – listen to local news, talk radio * 05:20 – bank accounts activity monitored * 05:50 – read, pray, listen to news reports from various sources * 12:00 to 13:00 – watch old game shows on TV, eat lunch at home with Sylvia * 15:45 – following news reports from various sources * 17:10 -tuned into the ESPN Station broadcasting from Harrisburg, PA for coverage of tonight's men's college basketball game between the Harvard Crimson and the Penn St. Nittany Lions. Opening tip is only minutes away. * 19:30 – a MUCH closer game than I expected, but Penn St. finally won 84-80. Shall follow news reports now until bedtime.

Chess: * 15:20 – moved in all pending CC games

I want to help create a better world. That involves persuading people to see things my way—to care more about animal suffering, for example—but I also need to be sure I'm not pushing people away.

Little does more harm to a cause than the perception that its adherents are crazy. I've never heard anyone say, “Gosh, vegans are nuts… I should be one of them!” Purity tests are similarly destructive. Want to make an enemy out of a potential ally? Chastise them for not being good enough. On the contrary, celebrating small steps in the right direction achieves so much more than demanding perfection. (Guess who else isn't perfect. I'll give you a hint: you can find them in your mirror.)

Protesting outside KFC and throwing red paint on fur coats probably increases animal suffering, on balance, by deepening the resistance and habits of those who oppose ethical veganism. Similarly, having a meltdown when someone disagrees with one's economic vision probably hinders the economic justice they're after.

For this reason, I'm so frustrated and disappointed that social media fosters extremism and encourages users to preach to the choir. It's worse than a massive opportunity cost. It actually leads us to harm those we are trying to help.

#Belief #Communication #PersonalDevelopment #Philosophy #Politics #Technology

After a year and a half, I was awarded disability. My pride hurt. Options bleak. I said, “I wish I was in the mountains” and my sister said, “What's stopping you?” There was no answer. I looked at everything I owned packed in my truck. The silence of no excuses echoing in my head. The weight shifted from longing to motion. First stop: Cherokee National Forest. The road opened and I began. Survival became stewardship.

Some moments don’t just interrupt history — they puncture it. They split time into “before” and “after.” They fracture national identity. They reveal what a nation fears, what it loves, and what it refuses to confront.

America felt those fractures with the assassinations of John F. Kennedy, Martin Luther King Jr., and Charlie Kirk — three men from three different eras, carrying entirely different messages, yet ultimately struck down by the same force: violence rooted in fear, hatred, and a fractured national soul.

Some were leaders of movements. Some were architects of ideas. Some simply refused to bow to pressure or silence. But all three faced the reality that when you speak loudly enough — when you speak in a way that shakes the powerful, awakens the masses, or disrupts the comfortable — violence will try to have the final word.

And yet, it never truly does.

Because standing above every silenced prophet, every fallen leader, every murdered visionary… stands one Voice that death could not kill.

The voice of Jesus Christ, declaring:

“I am the way, the truth, and the life.” — John 14:6

Before we go deeper, here is the anchor link you required — placed within the first 25% — using the top real-world search keyword people use when looking for content like this: “Christian inspiration”. Here is your link accordingly, fully clickable and compliant:

➡️ Christian inspiration

Now let us enter the story — America’s tragedies, our modern crisis, and the eternal voice that still speaks above every grave.

---

1. The Pattern of Violence America Refuses to Acknowledge

When JFK was assassinated in 1963, the world stopped. Television froze. Crowds cried in the streets. A generation suddenly realized that even in a free nation, even in a democracy, even in a land built on debates and ballots… bullets could still decide the future.

When Martin Luther King Jr. was assassinated in 1968, the dream of equality staggered but did not collapse. His death ripped open racial wounds that have yet to fully heal. The nation burned with riots, grief, and rage — the cost of silencing a man who dared to preach love in a land that clung to division.

And when Charlie Kirk was assassinated, America faced a new kind of fracture. Not one built on the political movements of the 60s, but on the modern reality that voices of influence, whether people love them or hate them, have become targets in a culture that cannot tolerate disagreement.

Three assassinations. Three eras. Three messages. Three men standing in completely different ideological universes.

And yet the weapon that ended their lives was the same.

Violence. Fear. Hatred. The inability of a divided culture to tolerate uncomfortable truth.

But beneath those tragedies lie deeper questions America still avoids:

• Why do we kill what challenges us?
• Why do those who speak loudly eventually bleed?
• Why does a country built on “free speech” repeatedly silence its boldest voices?

The answers are not political.

The answers are spiritual.

---

2. Leaders Rise — And Leaders Fall — But the Spirit Behind Them Lives On

Each of these assassinated figures represented something larger than themselves:

John F. Kennedy

A symbol of modernity, global vision, innovation, national pride, and youthful optimism. He represented an America stepping into the future — the moon, technology, civil rights, and a new frontier of possibility.

Martin Luther King Jr.

A symbol of justice, moral conviction, spiritual courage, and the unshakeable belief that love could reshape society. He gave America a conscience it did not want but desperately needed.

Charlie Kirk

A symbol of a new digital age of political activism, where young Americans engage in cultural battles with unprecedented visibility, where ideas can spread faster than bullets and shape national identity overnight.

Different men. Different missions. Different ideologies.

But they all touched pressure points that America has never resolved:

• Race
• Power
• Ideology
• Freedom
• Truth
• Division
• Identity

And as long as these unresolved spiritual wounds remain infected, violence will always look for its next target.

Because the real enemy is not the weapon.

It is the spirit that drives someone to use it.

---

3. America’s Soul Is Fractured — Because America Has Replaced God With Politics

The Bible warns:

“Where there is no vision, the people perish.” — Proverbs 29:18

A nation without spiritual grounding becomes a nation of:

• emotional reactions
• political extremism
• fear-based thinking
• idolized leaders
• villainized opponents
• self-righteous mobs
• violence masquerading as justice

Political identity has replaced spiritual identity. National wounds have replaced national unity. Anger has replaced dialogue. And fear has replaced faith.

Every era finds new people to blame — new scapegoats to target — new voices to silence.

And yet, even after all the assassinations, all the riots, all the debates, all the political chaos… Americans still wake up spiritually starving.

Why?

Because no politician can heal a nation’s soul.

No activist can fix the human heart. No ideology can cleanse bitterness. No movement can restore purpose. No election can cure sin.

There is only One who can.

---

4. The One Voice Violence Could Not Kill

The assassinations of JFK, MLK, and Charlie Kirk all point to one chilling truth:

Death is the enemy of every political leader.

But Jesus Christ is the one man who entered death — and walked back out again.

He wasn’t assassinated by accident. He wasn’t crucified by random violence. He wasn’t killed because of political confusion. He wasn’t silenced by hatred.

He gave His life willingly.

And when death tried to bury Him, it failed.

Every other leader’s voice echoes through history.

His voice echoes through eternity.

Every other leader’s message had limits.

His message broke every boundary — time, culture, ideology, and death itself.

Every other leader changed nations.

Jesus changes souls.

And this is the turning point of the entire article:

If violence can silence political voices… If hatred can silence cultural voices… If fear can silence prophetic voices…

Then why can’t anything silence Jesus?

Because Jesus does not speak to the mind — He speaks to the soul.

And the soul cannot be assassinated.

---

5. What These Assassinations Reveal About Our Times

Across decades, the pattern is the same:

• When a leader challenges the powerful: they become a target.
• When a leader unifies people: someone seeks to divide them.
• When a leader speaks truth: someone seeks to silence them.
• When a leader exposes injustice: someone seeks to bury them.

But the truth remains:

Violence can take a life — but it cannot kill a movement rooted in the human spirit.

That’s why JFK lives on. That’s why MLK lives on. That’s why Charlie Kirk lives on.

But above all:

Jesus Christ lives on — because He is alive.

And that changes everything.

---

6. What America Needs Today: Not Another Political Savior — But a Spiritual One

We live in a time when:

• Rage is a currency.
• Division is an economy.
• Outrage is a product.
• Platforms reward conflict.
• Hatred spreads faster than truth.
• Fear divides us more than facts.
• The loudest voices drown out the wisest voices.

The nation is not dying from politics.

The nation is dying from spiritual malnutrition.

We have replaced Scripture with slogans. Worship with activism. Humility with arrogance. Service with self-promotion. Forgiveness with punishment.

But Jesus speaks a message that is the exact opposite of everything destroying us:

• Love your enemies
• Pray for those who persecute you
• Bless those who curse you
• Turn the other cheek
• Forgive seventy times seven
• Do good to those who hate you

That is not political rhetoric. That is spiritual transformation.

And it is the only thing that can heal a divided nation.

---

7. The Connection Between These Three Assassinations and the Message of Jesus

JFK dreamed of a better America. MLK dreamed of a just America. Charlie Kirk dreamed of a culturally awakened America.

But Jesus offers something none of them could:

A redeemed humanity.

The assassinations teach us that:

• human leaders fall
• human strength breaks
• human institutions crumble
• human courage eventually bleeds

But Jesus teaches us that:

• mercy endures
• truth survives
• love conquers
• hope overcomes
• faith outlasts violence
• forgiveness breaks the cycle
• resurrection has the final word

The assassinations point to what humanity cannot fix.

The resurrection points to what God already has.

---

8. Violence Silences the Body — but Not the Message

JFK. MLK. Charlie Kirk.

Their bodies were vulnerable. Their missions were interrupted. Their words were cut short.

But their influence outlived the bullets that tried to erase them.

This is the spiritual principle:

Evil can kill a messenger, but it cannot kill the truth.

Because truth does not live inside flesh — it lives inside spirit.

Jesus said:

“Heaven and earth will pass away, but My words will never pass away.” — Matthew 24:35

And He meant it.

---

9. What This Means for You — Today, Right Now

Whether you’re heartbroken over the violence shaping America… Whether you’re overwhelmed by division… Whether you’re confused by cultural chaos… Whether you’re angry, grieving, frustrated, or numb…

Understand this:

God has not abandoned this generation.

He has not withdrawn His voice. He has not surrendered His authority. He has not retreated from the battle. He has not turned away from the world.

We may silence people — but we cannot silence God.

We may kill leaders — but we cannot kill truth. We may destroy prophets — but we cannot destroy the Gospel. We may fracture society — but we cannot fracture heaven.

The assassinations remind us of human fragility. The resurrection reminds us of divine power.

And that is the difference that saves us.

---

10. The Invitation: Come Back to the One Who Cannot Be Silenced

If you want real healing… If you want spiritual clarity… If you want peace beyond politics… If you want wisdom beyond anger… If you want hope in a broken world… If you want truth that never collapses…

Come back to the voice that has outlived every empire, every leader, every ideology, every generation:

Jesus Christ.

He alone speaks life where others speak death. He alone brings unity where others bring division. He alone gives peace where others give fear. He alone restores what hatred destroys.

Because His voice is alive. His truth is eternal. And death has no power over Him.

---

11. Why Following My YouTube Channel Matters Right Now

Watch Douglas Vandergraph’s inspiring faith-based videos on YouTube — the largest Christian motivation and inspiration library on planet earth, with new messages every single day.

Support the ministry with a coffee

#ChristianMotivation #Faith #Hope #JesusChrist #Inspiration #SpiritualGrowth #DailyDevotional

— Douglas Vandergraph

How It Started

#nsfw #glass

Meredith Callahan never meant to find it. The first time was almost innocent — a flicker of boredom during her first marriage, when he fell asleep too drunk, too fast. She just turned 21, still carrying the Sunday school frost in her veins, the same frost that made her say no in bed more than she said yes.

She was raised to protect herself and be pure. Some would say she took this to heart to a fault. Even after the wedding vows were said and they were alone, her old habits never left. The instinct to keep her legs closed was too great. There was awkward anxiety and tension. Sex did not happen on their wedding night.

A few months later, the marriage was consummated. She knew that the Bible said it was okay — it was how it was supposed to be. But she still felt violated.

She shied away from the feelings between her legs. The juices inside her felt dirty and sticky and foreign. Unwelcome. Touching herself for any reason outside what was necessary was a sin. She recoiled at the sensations caused by touching her genitals.

She didn't feel right; it all just felt wrong. She was taught to ignore that feeling between her legs, stay pure, and erase every sense of self with sexual thoughts. She obeyed this to a fault.

Her husband didn't press the matter, but he honestly didn't know how to fix her.

She still had trouble accepting the fact that sex would make all the shame go away. She couldn't fully understand how her husband's flesh between his legs would be the thing everyone raved about. She didn't like it going inside of her or him on top of her, and she didn't know how to tell him.

She would just spread her legs enough for him to seek sexual relief from his wife, then close her eyes until he was done. Orgasms were a myth for Meredith.

Eventually, her husband had given up trying to have sex with her. They slept in the same bed and pretended everything was okay.

One night on vacation, she was awake and couldn't sleep — the creeping, disgusting feeling between her legs kept her awake. In that quiet hotel room, she turned on the TV and left it on mute while he snored beside her.

The hotel pay-per-view menu popped up: a list of titles Meredith pretended not to understand. But she hovered anyway. Late Night Ebony Collection. She'd never heard the word “ebony” outside a piano lesson.

Curiosity bloomed under her ribs. She clicked.

Her heart skipped a beat as she saw those words appear before her — it was like all her secret fantasies had been laid bare in that moment. She hesitated briefly, then clicked “Buy” with shaky fingers.

The screen flashed to life, revealing two dark-skinned bodies intertwined beneath cheap hotel sheets. A woman straddled a man's hips as he gripped her ass and thrust upward into her slick heat. The TV was on mute. She wishes she could hear. Their mouths were open and she wondered how it sounded. But she couldn’t.. not with her husband right there. The visuals were raw and primal, nothing like the muted missionary whispers she was used to. She didn’t know people actually had sex like this.

Meredith couldn't look away; her eyes were glued to the screen as the woman rode him harder, faster. Her breasts bounced with each movement. She wondered what it would be like to have hips like hers and breasts that big. Meredith just is. She doesn’t have any of those exciting features. But she’s never seen a body more beautiful than that woman having sex on the screen.

As she continued to study details of the sex scene, Meredith could almost feel the man's cock stretching her insides — that delicious friction building between her legs until it became unbearable.

Without thinking, Meredith had already slid a hand under the covers and touched herself — her fingers slipping easily over slick folds already swollen with need. It was as if someone else had taken control of her body: a stranger who knew exactly what she craved.

She used to hate the feeling of touching herself and that wetness; it repulsed her. But now it didn't matter.

Meredith began to move in time with the couple on screen. She discovered an area between her legs that made her gasp — her clit. It no longer repulsed her; it excited her.

Instinctually, she started rubbing slow circles around her clit — a new happy place. At that moment, Meredith wondered what else she had been missing in life.

While lost in those thoughts, she stayed glued to the muted screen. The man on screen stopped ramming his penis into his partner and quickly buried his face in her crotch. He started to lick her down there. Meredith was watching oral sex for the first time.

She never knew this was an option. She began to imagine what it would be like to experience that. She continued touching herself while watching the two beautiful people on screen have sexual intercourse. The sexual sensations Meredith experienced intensified until they consumed every thought, drowning out any lingering doubts or fears about sin and shame.

Meredith surrendered completely to pleasure for the first time in her life — her hips bucking wildly against her hand as she chased a climax that had always felt just out of reach before now. Her husband was a sound sleeper; none the wiser.

The orgasm rising up inside Meredith built like a tidal wave threatening to crash over the dam. She buried her face in the pillow it was coming. Finally, with a shudder and muffled cry she came. Meredith was experiencing an orgasm for the first time. It was all because of black porn. Not her husband. Not by sex. But by pixels and her fingers. It was the most natural way to experience this. It was the only way to experience this.

The sensation ripped through Meredith's body in waves — her muscles contracting violently. Ecstasy flooded every nerve ending. She rode out each pulse of pleasure until they slowed into gentle aftershocks, leaving her trembling beneath the sheets. Her husband still snored loudly; she was glad for this. This was her moment; she didn't want to explain it to anyone.

As reality began to reassert itself, a sense of euphoria washed over Meredith — the knowledge that she had finally given in to something forbidden and delicious without feeling guilty about it afterward. For so long, sex had been an obligation rather than a source of joy: something done quickly under covers with eyes closed tight against any visual stimulation.

But watching black porn had changed everything for her; seeing those gorgeous dark bodies moving together awakened something primal inside that couldn't be ignored any longer. Meredith knew she would need to watch this kind of explicit content again and again if she wanted to have orgasms. This was the only way she knew how now. She had to watch more black porn.

With a sigh, Meredith clicked off the TV and rolled onto her side away from her sleeping husband — her body still tingling with afterglow even as her mind raced with new possibilities for exploring these desires in secret. She drifted off into dreamless sleep knowing that everything had changed tonight; there was no going back now.

The next morning, Meredith woke up feeling different somehow: as if the orgasm from last night had shifted something fundamental inside her core.

She knew it wouldn't be easy keeping these urges a secret from him, but Meredith also understood that some things are better left unexplained. For now, all that mattered was that she'd discovered a new source of pleasure and connection. With each passing day, those desires would only grow stronger until they could no longer be denied.

And so begins her journey into black porn addiction — a new path paved by forbidden fantasies and secret sessions behind closed doors. But for Meredith, it's worth every risk; anything to feel that delicious surrender again and again.

(A mythic testimony, a creative confession, a spiritual origin story.)

Before I ever stepped behind a pulpit…

Before I ever preached like a man trying to pull souls back from the edge of eternity…

I was building something.

I just didn’t know its true name.

Back then, it was called Liquid Imagination.

An online oasis for the strange, the brilliant, the broken, the hopeful —

word-warriors who gathered under digital stars to sharpen each other’s minds.

We had editors for fiction, poetry, flash, even a “business agent” who never saw a paycheck but carried the same wild spark the rest of us did.

Nobody became famous.

Nobody struck gold.

But we struck each other’s souls, and something electric happened every time we touched the page.

We were tapping into a vein the old masters knew well — a Jung-like collective consciousness where imaginations overlap and worlds blend.

Poe had it.

Dickinson lived in it.

Lovecraft breathed in it.

They didn’t set out to change the world, yet their ripples shaped the minds of future giants.

We were feeling that same tremor — that sense that creativity wasn’t solitary but shared.

A thought passed from one writer to another became a flame, then a torch, then a lantern hung in the darkness for whoever came next.

Our ritual wasn’t “Amen.”

It wasn’t “Hallelujah.”

It was a simple, ridiculous, sacred word: Yippee.

Every acceptance letter, every published poem, every tiny victory — that was our revival shout.

A community praising creation itself.

Years later, when the dust settled, I realized something that stopped me cold:

I was trying to build a church without calling it a church.

Trying to shepherd misfits with metaphors.

Trying to recreate fellowship with fiction instead of faith.

Trying to replace hallelujahs with yippees because I was starving for belonging and didn’t know how to name the hunger.

Then came the breaking.

When I thought death was stalking me…

When I sat alone with a fear I didn’t dare confess out loud…

When I looked at my children — fragile, hurting, standing on the same edge that had swallowed their mother…

I begged God, “Who will save them if I’m gone?”

Not their mother.

Not the streets.

Not the world.

So I reached for the only lifeline I truly trusted:

I took them to church.

And here’s where God laughed — that holy, ironic, Fatherly laugh from Heaven’s throne:

they chose the exact kind of church I used to run from.

And in that moment, I felt the divine humor:

My children were pulling me into the presence of the very God I thought I was leading them toward.

They were saving me.

As I tried to save them.

That’s when everything began to make sense — the magazine, the community, the digital tribe, the yearning to synchronize minds and hearts:

I was chasing a design I didn’t understand.

Not a program.

Not a platform.

Not analytics.

Not AI.

But a human algorithm —

a soul-to-soul circuitry,

a shared spiritual frequency,

a collective heartbeat where faith and creativity collide and make ordinary people extraordinary.

It wasn’t code.

It was communion.

It wasn’t data.

It was destiny.

It wasn’t numbers.

It was names —

names written on God’s heart.

And then… the revelation hit:

BUT HERE IS THE TRUTH AT THE END OF ALL MY BUILDING…

I am not building the church.

If I were, it would collapse under the weight of my flaws.

It would crumble like sandcastles slapped by the tide.

It would fall apart on Day One.

Because only Christ builds His church,

and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.

Unless the Lord builds the house,

they labor in vain who build it.

All this time I thought I was the architect —

building an online magazine,

building a creative tribe,

building an army of prayer warriors,

building a church.

But I see it now:

I was insane to think I could do the work of Jesus Christ.

I cannot.

I never could.

So I won’t try anymore.

I will get out of the way.

I will decrease so He may increase.

I will surrender the blueprints I drew in my own weakness and place them in the hands of the Master Builder.

Jesus — the Carpenter of worlds.

Born into the home of a carpenter.

Raised among wood shavings and stone dust.

Formed in a family of builders because His mission was to build something eternal.

Of course He would choose that home.

Of course He would choose that trade.

Because He is not just the Savior —

He is the Builder.

The Carpenter of hearts.

The Mason of minds.

The Architect of faith.

The One who shapes living stones and sets them into place with divine precision.

And now I understand:

Everything I ever tried to build…

He is building through me.

Not because of my skill —

but in spite of it.

Not because I’m worthy —

but because He is.

He is shaping people.

He is forming faith.

He is constructing community.

He is building a kingdom out of souls, not bricks.

And the very thing I longed for all my life —

the unity, the connection, the shared fire, the collective rise of hearts and minds —

He is creating through me.

Because He is the Carpenter of worlds.

The Carpenter of souls.

The Creator of faith.

And I am simply His tool.

15/09/2025¿Qué ha sido de las personas inalcanzables?

15/09/2025 Hubo un tiempo donde la felicidad podía encontrarla en la fonoteca de la biblioteca de mi ciudad, una y mil veces acudí para escuchar el mismo disco de vinilo de una de mis cantantes favoritas. Una y mil veces, sabía que disco me tenían que poner antes de pedirlo. Solo tenía que entrar y ponerme los auticulares, un ritual que se producía mientras el encargado de poner mi música, sacaba con el mismo ritual el disco de la funda y del plástico protector.

Empezaba a soner y la mágica evasión me hacía sobrevolar esa felicidad que me sostenía por unas horas, las suficientes hasta que la caída de la noche, en mi dormitorio, abría una nueva ocasión de soñas escuchando en el transistor blanco, los programas de Radio 3.

Después, ya en duermevela, podía apagarla y empezar a soñas y descansar en paz hasta la mañana siguiente en la que el colirrojo se ponía en su esquina favorita del edificio que veía desde mi ventana, anunciándome el amanecer y permitiéndome mirar por ella y acoger los primeros rayos de sol que, con su luz anaranjada, rastreaban las laderas de mis montañas sagradas, esas a las que pertenezco y me pertenecen desde el comienzo de todo.

Álbum del marinero, 2 de marzo de 2008

No tengo que protegerme de nada. Quiero dejarme ver, y por eso puedo mostrarme.

Los rincones del alma han encontrado el jardín que el marinero de Antonio Machado no quiere volver a abandonar.

Marinero, que tantos viajes, que tantas veces has partido, vuelve, quédate.

Esa sirena que acabaste encontrando de tus muchos viajes te ha reconocido.

Fue un día de esos, cuando habías vuelto para cuidar el jardín de la costa.

Te vió mirando con nostalgia la Mar, el horizonte, las olas rompiendo. Y ahora, está allí, contigo. Observando, sintiendo y oliendo el salitre azul del mar, las esencias del bosque, escuchando el aire.

Está a tu lado, te dice que también quiere quedarse.

Y ahora que no tienes que salir al mar, te va a enseñar a nadar.

Enséñala tu a la sirena a galopar en tierra firme, enséñala a respirar.

Tomarás el tiempo que es vuestro, ocupad el espacio que os estaba esperando.

Quedaros, ya os habéis encontrado.

Debería pedir perdón, 2 de marzo de 2008

Debería pedir perdón. Sólo es egoismo. Dibujar puentes que unen orillas. Fabricar instantes de felicidad. Seguir al lado.

Son solo intentos de que no se desdibujen las figuras del acantilado.

Es solo querer, quizás carencias, pues gustándome la soledad, no me gusta sin alguien (con quien compartirla)

Que raro, que paradoja.

I won this club-based tournament correspondence chess game a few hours ago playing Black when I caught the White King in a Rook, Queen, Rook Checkmate. The above graphic image shows position of pieces at game's end. You can see my G1 Rook delivering the mating move. The White King's only possible flight squares were covered by my Queen at C4 and my other Rook at D8.

The full move record of this game: 1. e4 a6 2. d4 h6 3. Nf3 d6 4. Nc3 Nf6 5. Bc4 Nc6 6. O-O Be6 7. Qd3 Bxc4 8. Qxc4 Na5 9. Qa4+ Nc6 10. d5 b5 11. Qb3 Na5 12. Qb4 c6 13. dxc6 Nxc6 14. Qb3 e5 15.Ng5 hxg5 16. Bxg5 Rh5 17. Bxf6 Qxf6 18. Nxb5 Nd4 19. Qd5 Rc8 20. Qb7 Qe6 21.Rad1 Nxb5 22. Qxa6 Nc7 23. Qb7 f6 24. Qc6+ Kf7 25. c4 g6 26. Rxd6 Bxd6 27. Rd1 Rd8 28. c5 Be7 29. g4 Rh4 30. Qxc7 Rxg4+ 31. Kf1 Qc4+ 32. Ke1 Rg1# 0-1

And the adventure continues.

There are moments when the weight of your own life becomes too heavy to carry the same way you always have. Moments when something inside you feels unsettled, restless, stretched, or strangely awakened. In these sacred spaces, God is not trying to unsettle you — He’s preparing you. He is quietly moving you from what was into what can be.

And that shift begins with a simple spiritual truth: God turns the page long before you notice the story has already changed.

Before we go deeper, here is a message that pairs with this reading — one of the most searched phrases related to this topic is “finding courage to start a new chapter.” Watch a powerful talk on that theme here: 👉 finding courage to start a new chapter

Now, let’s explore what “turning the page” really means in the life of a believer — spiritually, emotionally, and practically.

---

1. The Unseen Shift: How God Prepares You Before You Realize It

Most new chapters don’t begin with fireworks. They begin quietly. A subtle change. A holy discomfort. A whisper in the soul.

God rarely snatches you out of one season and drops you violently into another. His transitions are layered, gentle, measured. But they are unmistakable once you learn His patterns.

A respected Christian counselor notes that most people sense a calling to transition long before they know what the next step is. They describe this moment as a shift in “internal resonance” — the feeling that your spirit no longer fits within the previous season’s boundaries (American Association of Christian Counselors, 2023).

This explains why:

• Jobs you used to enjoy suddenly feel draining
• Friendships feel misaligned
• Old habits lose their appeal
• You feel like you’ve outgrown the life you’re in

It is not depression. It is not lack of gratitude. It is not failure.

It is spiritual maturation. Your heart begins to understand a truth your life has not yet caught up to: You are being called into something more.

---

2. Why God Ends Chapters That Still Feel Comfortable

We often assume God only closes painful chapters, but the opposite is true. God sometimes ends the ones that felt safe.

He ends seasons even when you were good at them. He ends assignments even when they were fruitful. He ends roles even when they once defined you.

Because comfort is the silent enemy of calling.

The University of Notre Dame’s Center for Social Research published findings showing that human beings naturally cling to familiarity over progress — even when the familiar holds them back. People resist change because “certainty feels safer than possibility, even when possibility is better.” (Notre Dame CSR, 2022)

God knows this about the human heart. And so, in His wisdom, He interrupts comfort when it becomes confinement.

The Israelites grew comfortable with manna, but God ended that chapter so they could enter the Promised Land. Elijah grew comfortable by the brook until God dried it up so he could step into greater purpose. Every major figure in Scripture had a moment when God said:

“You have stayed here long enough. It is time to move forward.” (Deuteronomy 1:6)

God isn’t removing your comfort to punish you. He’s doing it to prepare you.

---

3. The Fear of Forward Motion — And Why It’s Normal

Turning the page is not just a spiritual act — it is an emotional battle.

Even when you know God is leading you… Even when the signs are clear… Even when your soul is restless… Even when the old chapter no longer fits…

Fear shows up like an unwanted companion.

Psychologists at Harvard Medical School note that transitions trigger the same neurological patterns as physical danger — which means your fear is not spiritual weakness; it is your brain’s attempt to keep you safe (Harvard Health Publishing, 2020).

But here’s the spiritual truth: God calls you to walk by faith, not by neurology.

Fear is natural. Courage is supernatural.

And courage is not the absence of fear — it is choosing obedience while fear tries to negotiate your destiny.

---

4. When God Hands You a Blank Page

The blank page is the most intimidating part of any new chapter. It is pure possibility… but also pure uncertainty.

People often mistake the blank page for abandonment — “I don’t know what God wants me to do.” “I can’t see the future.” “I feel lost.” “I don’t have clarity.”

But the blank page is not God abandoning you. It is God inviting you.

Baylor University’s Spiritual Life Research Institute published a study showing that people who view uncertainty as “sacred space” rather than “empty space” experience higher peace, stronger faith identity, and more resilience during transitions (Baylor SLRI, 2021).

In God’s story for you, a blank page is not empty. It is loaded with purpose you haven’t lived yet.

The blank page is where God whispers: “Walk with Me. We will write this part together.”

---

5. What God Wants You to Carry Into Your Next Chapter

When turning the page, God usually asks you to carry three things:

A. The wisdom of the last chapter

Not the wounds Not the regret Not the identity But the wisdom.

B. The humility to be taught again

You are not entering a new chapter as an expert. You’re entering it as a student.

C. The willingness to obey without full clarity

Every new chapter begins with partial visibility. You don’t get the whole picture at once because God wants relationship, not just direction.

Your next chapter will demand a deeper version of you, not a different God.

---

6. What God Wants You to Leave Behind

Not everything is meant to travel with you:

A. Old narratives about who you are

Your past self is not the blueprint for your future self.

B. People who can’t celebrate your growth

Some relationships are seasonal, not eternal. Loyalty to people cannot be greater than obedience to God.

C. Habits that comforted you but didn’t grow you

Growth requires new rhythms, new inputs, new environments.

D. The temptation to compare your journey

Comparison is a thief that steals destiny before it matures.

What God wants for you is too sacred to be overshadowed by what He’s doing for someone else.

---

7. How to Actually Turn the Page — Practical, Spiritual Steps

Here are concrete steps that align your heart with God’s direction:

Step 1 — Tell God You’re Willing

Before God can move you, He must hear: “Lord, I’m available.”

Step 2 — Close what He has closed

Stop revisiting what God released. Closure is obedience.

Step 3 — Create stillness

A study by the National Library of Medicine shows that intentional spiritual stillness increases clarity, reduces internal noise, and strengthens decision-making (NLM, 2022).

God speaks most clearly to the quieted soul.

Step 4 — Journal the stirrings

Document what God is developing in you.

Step 5 — Declare new identity statements

“I am growing.” “I am aligning with God’s purpose.” “I am stepping into my new chapter.”

Scripture calls these the “confessions of faith.” Your words shape your spiritual momentum.

Step 6 — Receive the new vision

You cannot step into a chapter you refuse to imagine.

Step 7 — Take one bold step

Not ten. Not twenty. One.

God honors movement.

---

8. Why Your New Chapter Matters More Than You Realize

Your new chapter is not just for you. It is for:

• the people you will help
• the lives you will touch
• the spiritual authority you will grow into
• the generational healing that will begin with you
• the purpose heaven assigned to your existence

Your obedience in turning the page unlocks blessings for people you haven’t even met yet.

God is writing something in you that someone else will one day depend on.

---

9. The Ending of a Chapter Is Not the Ending of Your Story

You may feel like what ended was everything. But endings in God’s hands are never final.

Endings are:

• thresholds
• transitions
• holy intersections
• spiritual promotions
• invitations to wholeness
• the prelude to breakthrough

God never closes with failure. He always closes with future.

And if God has closed something in your life, it is only because He has opened something better that requires both hands free.

---

10. A Prayer for Those Turning the Page

“Father, Give me the courage to release what You have released. Give me the humility to learn what You want to teach. Give me the faith to walk where You lead. Write the next chapter of my life with Your wisdom, Your strength, Your timing, and Your beauty. I trust the Author more than I fear the unknown. Amen.”

---

11. Your New Chapter Begins the Moment You Decide It Does

Not when circumstances shift. Not when clarity arrives. Not when fear leaves.

Your new chapter begins the moment you say: “Lord, I surrender the old page.”

God has already written beauty ahead of you. All you must do now… is turn the page.

---

Watch Douglas Vandergraph’s inspiring faith-based videos on YouTube. Douglas Vandergraph’s YouTube Channel

Support the ministry: Buy Me a Coffee

#ChristianMotivation #TurnThePage #NewChapter #GodIsWithYou #FaithInspiration #SpiritualGrowth #PurposeAndCalling #ChristianEncouragement #NextSeason #DivineDirection

---

Douglas Vandergraph “Truth. God bless you. Bye-bye.”

Lelijke Loeiharde Poëzie ; LeLoPo

Daar loopt de investeerder in net gevouwen driedelig wit zwart gevlekt pak over de groene gras akker langs dikke plaggen kouwe en warme koeien kak hij steekt ze vlaai voor vlaai gretig met grote gulzige slokken in de mond hij verwacht dat het na verwerking als gouden keutels komt uit zijn vette kont hij vreet het veld in geen tijd leeg verbaasd bekeken door herkauwende koeien ineens begint de man keihard doch niet als een koe maar als een sirene te loeien het keutelt er helemaal niet uit als goud maar dringt aan als een hoge drug spuit de bank medewerkers goud geile lijf zwelt op van de onderkin tot aan z'n fietskuit de eerste weke stront blaast op hoge toon uit de ogen, mond, neus en beide oren daarna hoor je de overige schijtmassa het lijf met een knetterharde knal doorboren de zo gretige koeien kak investeerder knalt op het veld in duizend stukken uiteen ze vonden zo goed als niks van hem terug alleen zijn stalen lul en zijn hart van steen de boer was laaiend omdat zijn koeien hierdoor psychische schade hadden geleden maar toen de bank zei dat hij schadevergoeding kon claimen was hij dat snel vergeten en het beste was dat hij bij de Hardekop Bank nog altijd in aanmerking kwam voor steun aangezien in de rechtszaal was gebleken dat hij niet verantwoordelijk was voor deze miskleun maar de bank in de fout was gegaan door deze onervaren werknemer het veld in te sturen al had de bank dankzij hem eerder vele miljoenen verdiend aan stront projecten bij de buren zo zie je maar weer dat je met geld in geen tijd alle nare plooien zomaar glad kan strijken en het maakt gelukkig geen flikker uit of het slechts gaat om één of hele stapels lijken