Toilet Rol Stemmingsmeter van de Target Marketeer

Hallo Toilet Klant fijn dat u weer bent ingelogd voor deelname aan de persoonlijke stemmingsmeting in het mini eerste kamertje.

Dit door de enige echte toiletpapier influencer aangemaakte vul evenement kost u maar een paar minuten.

De maatschappij heeft mij geroepen zodat ik hier elke dag uw stemming mag meten. Zodat zij van de maatschap dankzij mij weten wat er op dit moment in u omgaat. Deze verse gegevens zetten zij later in voor het aanbieden van unieke massaal gefabriceerde producten voor in u geest of op locaties rondom het lijf. Dat wilt u toch ook!

Nu de test te vinden op vel twee, drie en vier, opeenvolgend, in drievoud hangend aan de rol.

Vraag 1.

Hoe voelt u zich op dit moment?

1. Enorm blij
2. Opgetogen
3. Gewoon
4. Niet jedat
5. In mineur

Veeg nu het juiste aantal keer over uwer edele billen en deponeer het antwoord in de pot.

Vraag 2.

Wat gaat u straks doen?

1. Genieten van de hele wereld
2. Allemaal nieuwe spullen aanschaffen
3. Wat ik altijd doe
4. Alleen de dingen die ik moet doen
5. Op bed liggen en heel lang stil liggen huilen

Veeg nu het juiste aantal keer over uwer edele billen en deponeer het antwoord in de pot.

Vraag 3.

Bent u tevreden over het vandaag reeds behaalde?

1. Uitermate tevreden alles ging beter dan goed
2. Niet ontevreden er is aardig wat gelukt.
3. Gewoon, zoals het hoort te gaan ging het
4. Niet echt tevreden, er ging meer fout dan goed
5. Diep ongelukkig, de paar dingen die ik deed zijn volkomen mislukt

Veeg nu het juiste aantal keer over uwer edele billen en deponeer het antwoord in de pot.

Spoel na afloop de aangeveegde test door naar de daarop wachtende instanties. Aan het einde van de dag kunt u online de dag aanbiedingen zien die horen bij de uitslag van de wc rol stemmings test van vandaag. Ik dank u wederom voor u inzet en tot straks.

Freundinnen & Freunde der Weisheit! All die Selbstoptimierungsgurus erklären Glück zur reinen Privatsache. Echtes Glück ist aber etwas anderes: nicht eine fortlaufende Selbstinszenierung, sondern Verantwortung und Sinn.

Unsere gegenwärtige Vorstellung von Glück ist oft erstaunlich schmal geraten. Was früher mit Tugend, Gemeinsinn und einer gerechten Gesellschaft verknüpft war, erscheint heute als Frage individueller Befindlichkeit: Wie kann ich mich besser fühlen, produktiver werden, meine Ziele effizienter erreichen? In einer Kultur, die Selbstoptimierung, Wohlfühlroutinen und persönliche Markenbildung zum Ideal erhoben hat, ist das Verständnis von Glück zur Privatsache geworden – reduziert auf Momente der Zufriedenheit und messbar in Datenpunkten. Was dabei verloren geht, ist die tiefere Dimension von Glück: jene, die sich aus Zugehörigkeit, Verantwortung und Sinn ergibt.

Ein erster Schritt zu einem tragfähigeren Glück liegt in der Abkehr vom rein individuellen Fokus. Wer sich als Teil eines grösseren Zusammenhangs begreift – sei es im Familienkreis, im Gemeinwesen oder in einer freiwilligen Aufgabe –, erlebt sein Leben nicht nur als fortlaufende Selbstinszenierung, sondern als bedeutungsvoll durch Verbindung. Gerade in einer Zeit, in der viele gesellschaftliche Strukturen unter Druck stehen, gewinnt das bewusste „Für-andere-da-sein“ an Wert – nicht als moralische Pflicht, sondern als Quelle innerer Stimmigkeit. Es sind oft die kleinen, unsichtbaren Beiträge, die Beziehungen tragen und persönliche Erfüllung ermöglichen.

Zweitens lohnt sich ein Perspektivenwechsel: Glück ist nicht primär eine Frage des Konsums oder der Wahlfreiheit, sondern eine Frage der Ausrichtung. Studien zeigen, dass Menschen ihr Leben dann als sinnvoll erleben, wenn sie ihre Handlungen mit grösseren Werten verbinden – etwa Fürsorge, Gerechtigkeit oder Verlässlichkeit. Es braucht kein perfektes Leben mit durchgeplantem Alltag. Viel entscheidender ist, ob wir unser Handeln als kohärent und relevant empfinden. Wer sein Engagement ausrichtet auf etwas, das über das eigene Wohlbefinden hinausgeht, erfährt oft eine tiefere Form von Zufriedenheit.

Drittens sollten wir die gängige Vorstellung hinterfragen, dass Glück mit ständiger positiver Stimmung gleichzusetzen sei. Ein erfülltes Leben schliesst Ambivalenz, Anstrengung und Unsicherheit mit ein. Gerade in Zeiten von sozialer oder ökologischer Krise zeigt sich, dass Glück nicht im Rückzug liegt, sondern im aktiven Mitgestalten einer Welt, die für viele lebenswert bleibt. Das grosse Glück entsteht dort, wo Menschen Verantwortung übernehmen, ohne sich aufzuspielen – wo sie verlässlich handeln, ohne immer perfekt sein zu müssen. Glück ist dann nicht das Ziel, sondern das Echo eines geglückten Daseins.

Denkanstoss zum Wochenbeginn

„Ich kann ihnen nicht sagen, wie man schnell reich wird. Ich kann ihnen aber sagen, wie man schnell arm wird: indem man nämlich versucht, schnell reich zu werden.“ – André Kostolany (1906–1999)

ProductivityPorn-Tipp der Woche: Schwierige Aufgaben zuerst (Eat the Frog)

Fange den Tag mit der schwierigsten oder unangenehmsten Aufgabe an. Danach fühlt sich alles andere leichter an und du vermeidest das ständige Aufschieben.

Aus dem Archiv: Warum nicht jeder Ratschlag zu dir passt

Wir hören es immer wieder: Erfolgreiche CEOs sagen, dass das Geheimnis ihres Erfolgs darin liegt, „Nein“ zu sagen. Influencer raten uns, dieses oder jenes Produkt zu kaufen, weil sie es angeblich selbst lieben. Doch was für sie funktioniert, muss nicht automatisch für dich passen. Pauschale Ratschläge ohne Berücksichtigung deines eigenen Kontextes können sogar gefährlich sein. Dieser Beitrag wirft einen kritischen Blick darauf, warum es so wichtig ist, Ratschläge zu hinterfragen – egal ob sie von einer erfolgreichen CEO oder einem beliebten Influencer kommen.

weiterlesen …

Vielen Dank, dass Du Dir die Zeit genommen hast, diesen Newsletter zu lesen. Ich hoffe, die Inhalte konnten Dich inspirieren und Dir wertvolle Impulse für Dein (digitales) Leben geben. Bleib neugierig und hinterfrage, was Dir begegnet!

---

EpicMind – Weisheiten für das digitale Leben „EpicMind“ (kurz für „Epicurean Mindset“) ist mein Blog und Newsletter, der sich den Themen Lernen, Produktivität, Selbstmanagement und Technologie widmet – alles gewürzt mit einer Prise Philosophie.

---

Disclaimer Teile dieses Texts wurden mit Deepl Write (Korrektorat und Lektorat) überarbeitet. Für die Recherche in den erwähnten Werken/Quellen und in meinen Notizen wurde NotebookLM von Google verwendet. Das Artikel-Bild wurde mit ChatGPT erstellt und anschliessend nachbearbeitet.

Topic #Newsletter

I hosted a lot of friends over today. They came over from 1 all the way till eight or 9 PM. This was the most amount of people I’ve hosted, like around like 12 or 13 at the peak. I’m glad I did it, but my social battery I think is drained. I think there’s also a certain amount of growing pain in finding your community of people and who you feel comfortable with.

I don’t think about her as much anymore. I almost have started to forget her face, but whenever I remember that, I think back to her and I have to stop myself. I also know that I have a lot of photos of her, and honestly I want to go back and look at them. But I don’t do it cause I know it’s smart not to. It’s strange because I don’t even know how much of her I miss, versus if I just miss the holes that she filled. But at the same time I think it’s a little bit of a mixture of both. I really do miss a lot of the connection in the suite moments that we shared, and a lot of the things that we were able to do together. But I think this is a dangerous thing, romanticizing things this soon. I still find that some of the places where it hurt me a lot are still sore. I try not to avoid things that remind me of her, but I don’t really want to see anything about VALORANT or VR chat. It’s weird to have tied myself so closely to someone who gave me so much doubt and anxiety. It’s weird the lack of self-respect/self-love that I had. I think I wanted a relationship so desperately, and I wanted it to work so badly that I kept telling myself that what happened was just a fluke over and over again. But at the same time that doesn’t make it any different, how nice and safe it felt to wake up to her. In the middle of the night waking up, and rolling over and pulling her arm over me, and getting to be hugged and cuddled to bed. Having someone that would lay on me. Feeling her hands pushing on my body in her shitty attempts at massages. It’s hard because she wasn’t a great partner a lot of different ways, but I think she did try. And at the end of the day someone can be good but not good enough. And I guess I just have a higher bar. I think she will have another partner that is maybe a little bit less mentally dominant that can coexist with her a little bit better, and things can be more her speed. And I think she’ll be happy and I think her partner will be very happy with her. She has a very kind heart. Just a bit naïve and with some growing to do. And I kind of feel like I grabbed her along and dragged her at my speed in life, and I think that’s not something she was ready for. We really are at different stages of life. In more ways than one. And I don’t miss having to almost regress myself in several different ways to match a little bit more. And I really like the stability that I have now. But I do mourn the future that I had planned and hoped for. I kept telling myself that people are just young right now, and if you give it a little bit of time people will mature more and grow. And I think that’s true, but at the same time I don’t know what I can even expect.

It’s a weird thing to me, I feel like in a lot of ways I consider myself exceptional, but at the same time I have problems with my self-worth. Sometimes I just wish that I was loved as a child and I wouldn’t have to worry about trying to figure out a concept that I never could believe. Like how could you fucking tell me that someone could just love you no matter what. Like even if you did bad at things, or even if you fucked up or even if you asked for help or a fucking hug sometimes, they would actually give it to you? Like if you told your parent that you were hurting, they would care? What a stupid fucking fantasy that is. And I know that it’s reality for a lot of people, but I just almost want to refuse the fact that it exists. The grapes I cannot taste must be sour. But I fucking just wish I could have been loved, not even for how much nicer it would’ve made the rest of my life, and maybe not making me try to kill myself. But even just for the fact that I could see myself as someone worth loving to myself, and to others. Because I say that I love myself and I think I do, but at the same time when I think of anyone else it’s almost like the only thing I should be loved for is either value, or loyalty from value I’ve already provided. And that fucking hurts to go through life that way.

Another surprisingly social day chatting with neighbors. The sun shone just long enough for me to run my long run too — what luck.

この部屋にはもう用がないので、出ていくことにした。 自分の顔はすっかり童話めいていて、ドアから出る行為によく似合っていた。 このドアには最初から鍵はなく、いつでもその気になれば出られたのだ。

ドアに手をかけ、後ろを振り返る。 部屋には大きな木の机と、木の椅子がひとつ。 壁には時計がかかっていた。

住んでいるときは何とも思わなかったが、 出ていくとなると、悪くない部屋だったかもしれないと思えるレイアウトだ。

一度ドアノブから手を離し、小さな部屋をゆっくり一周することにした。

ミシミシと床が音を立てる。 いつもより大きく聞こえる床の音。

呼吸も。 息を吸ったり吐いたり。 意図的に、吸ったあともう一度吸う遊びをしてみたりする。 息をするたび、お腹が暖かくなる。

窓から差し込む光は青白い。 まだ午前中だが、こんなことをしていたら、すぐにオレンジ色の光になってしまうから人生は忙しい。

リュックにさしていた水を飲む。 水というより、口の中の味を感じる。 自分は500mlを基本に飲むが、世の中には2Lのペットボトルに口をつける人もいることを思い出す。 丼が大盛より普通盛りの方が美味しいことは、なんとなくみんな気づいていると思う。 水も同じで、2Lより500mlのほうが美味しい。 ただ、コップに注ぐ場合は2Lから出した方が美味しいけれど。

右足より左足に重心がある。 というより、右足で地面を踏ん張れていない感覚がある。 左足を浮かせ、右足だけで立ってみても、それでも重心は左に寄る。 ただの違和感で、医者は何も言ってくれないだろう。 分かりやすいケガや痛みより、違和感を解決するほうがずっと難しい。

首の後ろに、チップのようなものが埋め込まれている気がする。 こんな質素な部屋に、望んで長くいたのだから、本当に誰かにチップを埋め込まれていてもおかしくない。 しかし、本当にチップが埋め込まれているわけではない。 それでも、そこにチップがあるという感覚。 自分の記憶が重要であることを、自分の脳内で視覚化しているのだ。

遠くで救急車の音がする。 誰かが運ばれていて、その人が助かったのかどうかは、分かる術がない。 毎日救急車の音が響くのに、自分の生活には直接影響がない。 救急車で運ばれる人は、普段は何をしているのだろう。

さて、部屋を一周したので外に出る。 床に落ちているホコリに「それでは」と言い、 悲しい顔は家側に、凛々しい顔は外に向け、 目的地はなく、ただまっすぐ歩くことだけを決めて、その家を跡にした。

A lone traveler embarks on a journey through a vibrant valley of blogging platforms, seeking the perfect path to share their voice and stories with the world.

Okay, it has been one year since I joined Micro.blog and Scribbles.page, and just over a year since I joined Write.as. I thought I would review all three services with a clear winner, a hard “can't wait for my subscription to end and won't be renewing,” and a dark horse.

I joined all three within months of each other looking to get rid of my InMotionHosting web host and get away from WordPress. I didn't like the direction that Matt Mullenweg was heading and didn't want to get burned like I did with Elon Musk and Twitter. Twitter was a special place for me as I refused to use any Zuckerberg product, especially since he ruined Instagram.

Now with the history out of the way, here we go.

Write.as — I joined the free tier in October/November 2024 and was initially impressed by its simplicity compared to WordPress. I like paying for services ahead of time, so I bought the five-year plan. That was buyer's regret.

Customization is where Write.as falls apart. Anything beyond typing and publishing requires contorting CSS and JavaScript, and even then there are limits. The rich editor is buggy and loses formatting if you switch between rich and plain text modes.

The platform feels stagnant. Post preview was first requested in October 2018. Over seven years later, it finally got shipped but within the plain text editor only and does not account for any custom CSS. Users are asking for more than a simple text preview. They want to actually see how the post is going to look live. Support has historically been slow, though the owner has recently brought on some help.

The sole owner has been transparent about his shifting priorities. He took a sabbatical from development in 2022 and has written about moving toward other creative pursuits. In recent blog comments, Matt acknowledged taking mental health breaks “at different points over the years” and has even considered succession planning. While his transparency is commendable, paying customers are left wondering when development will resume in earnest.

Photo integration through Snap.as is frustrating. If you want picture galleries, you have to pay extra, but you can't even embed them in Write.as posts. In September 2025, the owner asked users what they'd want galleries to look like, saying “the design is the biggest thing holding us back.” After years as a paid feature, basic functionality is still missing.

The price has increased from $7 to $9 a month, though the proprietor regularly runs promotions and you can pick up 5 years for $180. For comparison, Micro.blog's $5 plan includes blog hosting, custom domain, cross-posting, native apps, and photo sharing. Their $10 Premium plan offers even more. You get dramatically more features and active development for less money.

Pros:

• Excellent Fediverse integration. Posting, editing, and deleting all sync reliably. Any instance can follow Write.as blogs, including Mastodon, Sharkey, and Misskey.
• Sole owner operated, appealing to those who prefer independent services.
• Simple and minimalist if all you need is to type and publish.
• If you get hosting on sale it is a passable deal as long as you know the limitations.

Cons:

• No proper post preview after seven years of requests.
• Rich editor is buggy and limited.
• Customization requires CSS/JavaScript expertise.
• Features disjointed across separate services with extra charges.
• Development has stagnated.
• Price increased to $9/month while offering less than competitors.
• Owner's priorities have shifted away from the platform.

Micro.blog is almost the opposite of Write.as in all ways, and 90 percent of those differences are positive.

I've already reviewed Micro.blog extensively in this blog post here, so I won't rehash everything here. The premium plan is only $1 more than Write.as ($10 vs $9), but you get dramatically more value. Micro.blog is constantly evolving, and the owner maintains development pace while keeping the platform stable and minimally disrupted. Also, keep in mind every tier has different features.

Pros:

• Active weekly development with new features, bug fixes, and improvements shipped constantly
• Extensive feature set: podcasts, newsletters, photo galleries, image hosting, video hosting, multiple blogs, and audio transcription
• Cross-posting to 10+ platforms (Mastodon, Bluesky, Medium, LinkedIn, Tumblr, Flickr, Nostr, Pixelfed, Threads, PeerTube)
• Better customization: themes, custom CSS/JavaScript, Hugo-based with plug-ins
• Import from WordPress, Medium, Ghost, Substack, Write.as, Instagram, Twitter archives, and more
• Responsive support with dedicated Community Manager
• Multiple pricing tiers ($5 basic, $10 premium, $20 Studio) offering more features than Write.as at comparable or lower prices
• Strong community guidelines with human-curated “Discover” section

Cons:

• Awkward Fediverse implementation not fully compatible with non-Mastodon instances
• Features not easily discoverable
• Android apps lagging behind Mac/iOS apps

I would easily recommend this service. It is probably the most well-rounded and actively maintained platform out there if you need these features.

Scribbles.page is my dark horse. This is a managed blog hosting service with excellent design. Vincent Ritter, the owner and designer, has been on a tear lately modernizing the platform and adding features.

The only drawback for me is the lack of Fediverse integration and POSSE. But it makes up for it in every other respect and serves as a nice companion to Micro.blog with built-in cross-posting support.

Vincent is developing a robust API based on JSON and Micropub standards. The only thing I see missing is media uploading, which he is still working on. The pace of changes on Scribbles has been steady and everything is polished.

A social feature unique to the platform is something Vincent calls “Scribbles,” which lets readers send short private messages to blog owners about their posts. It's more casual than email and completely privacy-friendly since scribbles are private notes between the sender and recipient, not publicly shared. The platform also features a nice explorer page where you can discover other blogs, and it's available via RSS feed. Vincent regularly announces software updates there, keeping users informed about new features and improvements. If I had found this before Write.as or Micro.blog, this might have been my only purchase, and the Fediverse could have been implemented via n8n, IFTTT, or a custom solution.

I also appreciate that he plans to offer self-hosting for Lifetime members, and there is a Lifetime membership option instead of subscriptions, which addresses my subscription fatigue. One last detail that might matter to some: it is hosted and based in Europe.

The Verdict

After one year on all three platforms, here's my decision:

Write.as is the “won't be renewing.” Unless it drastically changes course in the next five years, it is too limited and stagnant. While the Fediverse integration is excellent, that alone doesn't justify the price when competitors offer more features and active development. Only consider it if you get a significant promotional discount and need nothing beyond basic blogging with ActivityPub.

Micro.blog is the clear winner. It delivers exceptional value with constant development, extensive features, and strong community management. The platform continues to evolve while remaining stable. Despite everything increasing in price lately, I am surprised Micro.blog hasn't raised its rates. I wholeheartedly recommend it.

Scribbles.page is the dark horse. If you don't need federation features and value gorgeous design with modern blogging standards, this is a compelling choice. The lifetime membership option and Vincent's impressive development momentum make it worth serious consideration.

---

Links may be shortened via mtribe.link for cleaner formatting. All links redirect to their original destinations.

#opinion #review

Somewhere inside a foundation model trained on millions of supposedly de-identified electronic health records, a ghost lingers. Not a literal one, of course, but a data spectre: the clinical history of a patient whose records were stripped of names, addresses, and social security numbers before ever touching an algorithm. The model was never supposed to remember this person. It was supposed to learn medicine. Instead, it learned a patient.

This is the memorisation problem, and it is rapidly becoming one of the most consequential privacy challenges in clinical artificial intelligence. As healthcare systems worldwide rush to deploy foundation models trained on vast troves of electronic health record data, researchers are discovering that de-identification, the process long treated as the gold standard for protecting patient privacy, may not be enough. These models do not merely generalise medical knowledge from the populations they study. In some cases, they memorise individual patient records with enough fidelity that an adversary armed with the right prompts could extract sensitive clinical details about real people.

The implications are profound. A patient with a rare autoimmune disorder, an individual whose HIV status was recorded during a hospital visit, a person who sought treatment for substance use: these are precisely the kinds of patients whose records are most vulnerable to memorisation, because their clinical profiles are, by definition, unusual. And unusualness is exactly what makes data memorable to a machine learning model.

When Models Remember What They Should Forget

In October 2025, a team of researchers led by Sana Tonekaboni, a postdoctoral fellow at the Eric and Wendy Schmidt Center at the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, published a paper that would reframe how the clinical AI community thinks about privacy. The study, “An Investigation of Memorization Risk in Healthcare Foundation Models,” was presented at the 2025 Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) in San Diego. Co-authored with Lena Stempfle, Adibvafa Fallahpour, Walter Gerych, and Marzyeh Ghassemi, an associate professor at MIT in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, the paper introduced a suite of black-box evaluation tests designed to probe whether foundation models trained on structured electronic health records were genuinely generalising medical knowledge or simply recalling individual patients.

The distinction matters enormously. A model that generalises has learned, say, that patients over 65 with elevated troponin levels and chest pain are at high risk of myocardial infarction. That knowledge draws on thousands of patient records and reflects a genuine population-level pattern. But a model that memorises has locked onto a singular patient record, and when prompted with the right combination of attributes, it can reproduce details about that specific individual. “Knowledge in these high-capacity models can be a resource for many communities,” Tonekaboni explained, “but adversarial attackers can prompt a model to extract information on training data.”

The framework the team developed includes methods for probing memorisation at both the embedding level, where models encode patient data as numerical representations, and the generative level, where models produce clinical outputs. Crucially, the researchers designed their tests to distinguish between benign generalisation and genuinely harmful memorisation. Not all information leakage is created equal. If a model reveals that a particular patient profile tends to involve elderly males, that reflects population statistics. If it reveals that a specific combination of laboratory values, timestamps, and diagnostic codes corresponds to a single identifiable individual, that constitutes a privacy breach.

The findings were sobering. The researchers demonstrated that the more prior knowledge an attacker possesses about a particular patient, the more likely the model is to leak additional information. Patients with rare conditions proved especially vulnerable, precisely because their clinical signatures are distinctive enough to be picked out from the broader training distribution. And while some categories of leaked information, such as a patient's age or gender, represent relatively low risk, others carry serious consequences. Diagnoses related to HIV, substance use disorders, or mental health conditions were flagged as potentially harmful disclosures that could damage a person's employment prospects, insurance coverage, or social standing.

Ghassemi, the paper's senior author, offered a practical framing of the threat. “We really tried to emphasise practicality here,” she noted. “If an attacker has to know the date and value of a dozen laboratory tests from your record in order to extract information, there is very little risk of harm. If I already have access to that level of protected source data, why would I need to attack a large foundation model for more?” The question cuts to the heart of the adversarial calculus: how much prior knowledge makes an attack feasible, and at what point does memorisation cross from theoretical vulnerability to practical danger?

The Adversary's Toolkit

To understand the scale of the memorisation threat, it helps to look beyond healthcare-specific models to the broader landscape of large language model security research. The foundational work in this space comes from Nicholas Carlini and colleagues, whose research at Google DeepMind and collaborating institutions has systematically demonstrated that language models memorise and can be made to regurgitate their training data.

In a landmark 2021 paper published at USENIX Security, Carlini, along with Florian Tramer, Eric Wallace, and others, showed that an adversary could extract hundreds of verbatim text sequences from GPT-2, including personally identifiable information such as names, phone numbers, and email addresses. The attack required no access to the training data itself, only the ability to query the model. By 2023, the same research group, now including Milad Nasr, Daphne Ippolito, and Christopher Choquette-Choo, had scaled their methods dramatically. Their paper “Scalable Extraction of Training Data from (Production) Language Models” demonstrated that an adversary could extract gigabytes of training data from both open-source models and commercial systems including ChatGPT.

The 2023 work introduced a particularly concerning technique: the divergence attack. By crafting prompts that cause a model to diverge from its normal conversational behaviour, the researchers achieved training data emission rates up to 150 times higher than those observed during typical usage. The attack essentially tricks aligned models into reverting to their pre-alignment behaviour, at which point they begin outputting memorised sequences with alarming fidelity.

What does this mean for clinical AI? The attack surface is substantial. An electronic health record foundation model trained on millions of patient records contains, by design, sensitive clinical information. Even if the records have been de-identified according to HIPAA standards, the model itself may have encoded enough information to reconstruct individual patient profiles when queried with the right combination of clinical attributes. A rare diagnosis combined with a specific age range and a distinctive pattern of laboratory values could function as a fingerprint, allowing an attacker to extract additional details that the de-identification process was supposed to protect.

The level of prior knowledge required for a successful attack varies depending on the model architecture, training methodology, and the patient population in question. Research on general-purpose language models suggests that model size strongly correlates with memorisation: larger models, with their greater capacity to store training data patterns, are more vulnerable to extraction attacks. Given that clinical foundation models are trending towards ever-larger architectures to capture the complexity of medical knowledge, this scaling relationship poses a direct tension between clinical utility and patient privacy.

De-identification Was Never Bulletproof

The memorisation problem does not exist in isolation. It builds upon decades of research demonstrating that de-identification of health data has always been more fragile than regulators and healthcare institutions have assumed.

The seminal work in this field belongs to Latanya Sweeney, now the Daniel Paul Professor of the Practice of Government and Technology at the Harvard Kennedy School. In 1997, while still a graduate student at MIT, Sweeney demonstrated that she could re-identify the medical records of then-Massachusetts Governor William Weld by cross-referencing publicly available voter registration data with de-identified hospital discharge records. The records had been stripped of names, addresses, and social security numbers, but they retained date of birth, gender, and ZIP code. Sweeney showed that just these three attributes were sufficient to uniquely identify an individual.

Her subsequent research revealed that 87 per cent of the United States population could be uniquely identified using only ZIP code, date of birth, and gender, a finding that helped shape the HIPAA Privacy Rule's Safe Harbour de-identification standard. Yet even with these protections in place, re-identification remains possible. A 2018 study demonstrated that patients could be re-identified from HIPAA-compliant de-identified datasets by cross-referencing them with publicly available newspaper articles about hospitalisations.

A 2025 paper published in AI and Ethics highlighted the particular challenge of clinical free text. Structured data fields like diagnosis codes and laboratory values can be systematically scrubbed, but clinical notes contain narrative descriptions that may include identifying details embedded in the prose: references to a patient's occupation, family circumstances, or the name of a referring physician. De-identification tools, including those powered by natural language processing, struggle with the ambiguity and variability of clinical language.

The emergence of foundation models adds a new dimension to this longstanding vulnerability. Traditional re-identification attacks required an adversary to obtain and cross-reference multiple external datasets. Memorisation attacks against AI models require only the ability to query the model itself. The model becomes both the target and the pathway to the data it was trained on, collapsing what was previously a multi-step process into a single interaction. A 2025 study published in PMC on contemporary threats to anonymised healthcare data warned that AI-based techniques can now infer identity from traditionally de-identified sources using data such as electrocardiograms or patterns of gait, data types that were never considered identifiers under existing privacy frameworks.

How AI Threats Compare with Conventional Cybersecurity Risks

The memorisation vulnerability exists within a broader landscape of healthcare cybersecurity threats that are already severe and worsening. Understanding how AI-specific risks compare with conventional attack vectors is essential for calibrating the response.

The numbers from conventional healthcare cybersecurity are staggering. In 2024, 259 million Americans had their protected health information compromised through hacking incidents, a figure driven overwhelmingly by the Change Healthcare ransomware attack. That single breach, perpetrated by the ALPHV/BlackCat ransomware group, affected approximately 190 million individuals after attackers exploited a Citrix remote access service that lacked multi-factor authentication. UnitedHealth Group, Change Healthcare's parent company, reported total cyberattack impacts of 2.457 billion dollars in the first nine months of 2024 alone.

The healthcare sector has become the most targeted industry for ransomware, accounting for 17 per cent of all ransomware attacks across sectors. Complete protected health information packages command prices of up to 1,200 dollars per record on criminal marketplaces, roughly 80 times the value of stolen credit card data. Over 80 per cent of stolen health records in 2024 were taken not from hospitals directly but from third-party vendors, software services, and business associates, highlighting the systemic nature of the vulnerability.

Against this backdrop, AI memorisation attacks represent a qualitatively different kind of threat. Conventional breaches involve exfiltrating stored data, breaking through perimeters, and exploiting network vulnerabilities. Memorisation attacks exploit the model itself as an unwitting data store. There is no firewall to breach, no database to penetrate. The sensitive information is encoded within the model's parameters, distributed across billions of numerical weights in ways that resist simple detection or removal. An attacker needs nothing more than API access to the model, which in many clinical deployment scenarios would be available to any authorised user of the system.

The two categories of threat also differ in their detectability. A ransomware attack produces obvious signs: encrypted systems, operational disruption, ransom demands. A memorisation extraction attack can be conducted through queries that resemble normal clinical usage, making it far harder to detect. Medical identity theft already takes an average of 24 months to discover, compared with four months for financial fraud. Memorisation-based data extraction could extend this detection timeline even further, because the data never technically leaves the system in the conventional sense.

Yet it would be a mistake to treat AI memorisation as the dominant threat. The scale of conventional breaches dwarfs anything that memorisation attacks have demonstrated in practice. The Change Healthcare incident compromised the records of roughly 190 million people in a single event. Memorisation attacks, by contrast, tend to target individual patients or small groups, requiring specific prior knowledge about each target. The threat from memorisation is more surgical than it is sweeping, but for the individuals affected, particularly those with rare conditions or stigmatising diagnoses, the consequences could be devastating.

The Regulatory Patchwork

The regulatory response to AI memorisation risks in healthcare remains fragmented and, in many respects, inadequate. Existing frameworks were designed for a world where privacy threats came from databases, not algorithms.

In the United States, HIPAA remains the foundational framework for protecting health information, but it was enacted in 1996, long before the emergence of clinical AI. The proposed update to the HIPAA Security Rule, published by the Department of Health and Human Services in January 2025, represents the first major revision in over a decade. The proposal eliminates the distinction between “required” and “addressable” security controls, mandates encryption for all electronic protected health information, and introduces multi-factor authentication requirements. Critically, it establishes that data used in AI training, prediction models, and algorithm development by regulated entities falls under HIPAA's protections.

However, the proposed rule does not specifically address memorisation risks. It treats AI systems primarily through the lens of conventional cybersecurity: access controls, encryption, audit logging. These measures are necessary but insufficient for a threat that is embedded within the model's learned representations rather than stored in a conventional database. The public comment period for the proposed rule closed in March 2025 with nearly 5,000 submissions, and the final rule is expected in late 2025 or 2026. Whether it will address the unique characteristics of AI memorisation remains uncertain.

The European Union's approach through the AI Act offers somewhat more specificity. The regulation classifies AI systems used in healthcare as high-risk, subjecting them to requirements for data governance, transparency, human oversight, and post-market monitoring. From August 2026, most obligations will apply, with full compliance for high-risk medical device AI required by August 2027. The Medical Device Coordination Group published guidance document MDCG 2025-6 to clarify how the AI Act interacts with existing medical device regulations under the MDR and IVDR frameworks.

The AI Act's data governance requirements are particularly relevant to memorisation. High-risk AI manufacturers must implement practices appropriate for the intended purpose, including attention to possible biases and privacy risks. The transparency obligations require that systems be designed to allow deployers to interpret outputs and use systems appropriately. These provisions create a regulatory foundation that could, in principle, require memorisation testing before deployment. But the specifics of implementation remain to be worked out through standards and guidance that have not yet been finalised.

At the state level in the United States, a patchwork of legislation is emerging. By 2025, over 250 AI-related bills had been introduced across more than 34 states. Texas enacted the Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act in June 2025, requiring healthcare practitioners to provide patients with written disclosure of AI use in diagnosis or treatment. Colorado and Utah have enacted their own comprehensive AI laws. The result is a fragmented landscape that creates compliance challenges for healthcare organisations operating across jurisdictions whilst providing inconsistent protection for patients.

Technical Safeguards and Their Limits

The technical toolkit for mitigating memorisation risks is growing, though no single approach offers a complete solution.

Differential privacy, the mathematical framework developed by computer scientists including Cynthia Dwork of Harvard University, provides formal guarantees about information leakage during model training. By adding carefully calibrated statistical noise to the training process, differential privacy ensures that the model's outputs reveal almost nothing about any individual training example. Recent research has demonstrated that healthcare AI models can achieve 96.1 per cent accuracy with a privacy budget of epsilon equals 1.9, suggesting that strong privacy and high clinical performance can coexist.

Yet differential privacy has limitations. The privacy-utility trade-off is real: stronger privacy guarantees require more noise, which can degrade model performance on clinical tasks where accuracy directly affects patient outcomes. The United States Census Bureau's experience with differential privacy in the 2020 census provides a cautionary example. Research found that the technique introduced disproportionate discrepancies for rural and non-white populations, raising concerns about equity impacts that would be equally relevant in clinical settings where underrepresented populations already face disparities in care.

Federated learning offers another approach, keeping patient data decentralised across institutions whilst training a shared model. Rather than aggregating raw data on a central server, each participating hospital trains the model locally and shares only model updates. Yet research has shown that these model updates themselves can leak information. Gradient inversion attacks can reconstruct substantial portions of original training data from the mathematical updates exchanged during federated learning. A study titled “Two Models are Better than One: Federated Learning Is Not Private for Google GBoard Next Word Prediction” demonstrated that user sentences could be reconstructed from model updates alone.

Machine unlearning, the targeted removal of specific patient data from a trained model, has emerged as a conceptually appealing response to memorisation. The approach aligns with the General Data Protection Regulation's right to be forgotten, which allows individuals to request deletion of their personal data. Research presented at MICCAI 2025 introduced Forget-MI, a method for unlearning multimodal medical data from trained architectures. A December 2025 testbed called MedForget modelled hospital data as a nested hierarchy, enabling fine-grained unlearning assessment across multiple organisational levels.

But machine unlearning faces fundamental practical barriers. Retraining a model from scratch without specific patient data remains the only guaranteed path to complete unlearning, and for large foundation models, retraining can take weeks and cost millions of dollars. Approximate unlearning methods are faster but cannot guarantee that all traces of a patient's data have been removed. Moreover, if certain demographic groups are more likely to exercise their right to be forgotten, the resulting training data could become skewed, potentially worsening the very biases that clinical AI is supposed to help address. As a Health Affairs analysis noted, machine unlearning “is computationally intensive, scientifically immature, and potentially destabilising to models that must remain reliable across a wide range of clinical inputs.”

Data deduplication, the removal of repeated training examples, provides a simpler but partial mitigation. Research has consistently shown that models are more likely to memorise data that appears multiple times in training sets. Curating and deduplicating training data can reduce memorisation rates, though it cannot eliminate the risk entirely for patients whose clinical profiles are inherently distinctive.

Building an Evaluation Framework That Works

The MIT team's work points towards what a comprehensive evaluation framework for clinical AI memorisation might look like. Their open-source toolkit, validated on a publicly available electronic health record foundation model, provides a starting point for systematic privacy assessment before model deployment.

The framework's key innovation is contextualising memorisation within healthcare. Not all information leakage constitutes a meaningful privacy risk. A model that reveals population-level patterns, such as the typical age distribution of patients with a particular condition, is doing exactly what it was designed to do. The danger arises when a model's outputs can be traced to a specific individual, particularly when the leaked information includes sensitive diagnoses or treatment histories.

Tonekaboni emphasised the importance of practical evaluation. “This work is a step towards ensuring there are practical evaluation steps our community can take before releasing models,” she said. The framework assesses both embedded memorisation, where patient information is encoded in the model's internal representations, and generative memorisation, where the model can be prompted to produce patient-specific outputs. By testing across both dimensions, the framework provides a more complete picture of privacy risk than either approach alone.

For this kind of evaluation to become standard practice, it would need to be integrated into the regulatory approval process for clinical AI systems. Currently, most AI-enabled medical devices in the United States are cleared through the FDA's 510(k) pathway, which requires demonstration of substantial equivalence to a previously approved device but does not mandate independent clinical performance studies or privacy evaluation. A cross-sectional study of 903 FDA-approved AI devices found that clinical performance studies were reported for only approximately half at the time of regulatory approval. Memorisation testing is not part of the approval process at all.

The Coalition for Health AI (CHAI), on whose working group Ghassemi serves, represents one effort to establish industry-wide standards for trustworthy health AI. The NIST AI Risk Management Framework provides a complementary structure, addressing validity, reliability, safety, security, explainability, privacy, and fairness. Integrating memorisation evaluation into these existing frameworks would be more practical than creating entirely new regulatory apparatus, but it requires agreement on what constitutes acceptable levels of memorisation risk, a question that remains open.

Rare Conditions, Outsized Vulnerability

The memorisation problem falls hardest on the patients who can least afford it. Individuals with rare diseases, by definition, have clinical profiles that stand out from the broader population. Their diagnostic codes appear infrequently in training data. Their laboratory value patterns are unusual. Their treatment trajectories are distinctive. All of these characteristics make their records more memorable to a model and more extractable by an adversary.

The same is true for patients with stigmatising diagnoses. HIV status, substance use disorders, psychiatric conditions, and sexually transmitted infections all carry social consequences that extend far beyond the clinical encounter. Disclosure of these conditions can affect employment, housing, insurance, and personal relationships. De-identification was supposed to sever the link between these sensitive details and the individuals they describe. Memorisation threatens to re-forge that link through the model itself.

This disproportionate vulnerability raises equity concerns that mirror broader patterns in healthcare AI. Research has repeatedly shown that AI systems can perpetuate and amplify existing biases against marginalised populations. If memorisation risks are concentrated among patients with rare or stigmatising conditions, the privacy burden falls most heavily on those who are already underserved by the healthcare system.

Addressing this inequity requires targeted protections. Higher levels of differential privacy noise could be applied to training data involving sensitive diagnoses, at the cost of reduced model performance for those specific conditions. Rare disease patient records could be excluded from training sets entirely, though this would eliminate the clinical utility of foundation models for precisely the populations that stand to benefit most from AI-assisted care. Neither option is satisfactory, and the tension between privacy protection and clinical benefit for rare disease patients may prove to be one of the defining challenges of clinical AI governance.

What Genuine Protection Requires

The path from current vulnerability to genuine protection requires action across multiple domains simultaneously. No single technical safeguard, regulatory standard, or evaluation framework will suffice in isolation.

On the technical side, differential privacy during training should become the default rather than the exception for clinical foundation models. Memorisation evaluation, using frameworks like the one developed by Tonekaboni and colleagues, should be mandatory before any model is deployed in a clinical setting. Ongoing monitoring should be built into deployment infrastructure to detect potential memorisation-based extraction attempts in real time. And machine unlearning capabilities, however immature, should be developed and standardised so that patients can exercise meaningful control over the fate of their data within AI systems.

On the regulatory side, HIPAA needs to evolve beyond its current framework to address threats that are embedded within model architectures rather than stored in conventional databases. The EU AI Act's high-risk classification for healthcare AI provides a useful starting point, but implementation guidance must specifically address memorisation risks. Regulatory bodies including the FDA, the European Medicines Agency, and national health authorities need to incorporate memorisation testing into their approval and post-market surveillance processes.

On the institutional side, healthcare organisations deploying clinical AI must treat memorisation as a distinct category of risk requiring its own governance structures, audit procedures, and incident response plans. The conventional cybersecurity toolkit, with its emphasis on perimeter defence, encryption, and access control, is necessary but not sufficient for threats that live inside the model rather than outside the firewall.

The researchers behind the MIT study plan to expand their work to become more interdisciplinary, bringing in clinicians, privacy experts, and legal scholars. That instinct is exactly right. The memorisation problem sits at the intersection of computer science, medicine, law, and ethics, and solving it will require all four disciplines working in concert.

“There's a reason our health data is private,” Tonekaboni observed. “There's no reason for others to know about it.” That principle has guided health privacy law for decades. The question now is whether it can survive the age of foundation models trained on the very data it was designed to protect. The answer will depend on whether the clinical AI community treats memorisation as a fundamental design constraint rather than an afterthought, building privacy into the architecture of these systems from the ground up rather than bolting it on after deployment. The technology to do so exists. Whether the will and the regulatory momentum exist to mandate it remains the open question.

---

References and Sources

1. Tonekaboni, S., Stempfle, L., Fallahpour, A., Gerych, W., and Ghassemi, M. “An Investigation of Memorization Risk in Healthcare Foundation Models.” arXiv:2510.12950, presented at NeurIPS 2025. https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.12950

2. MIT News. “MIT scientists investigate memorization risk in the age of clinical AI.” January 5, 2026. https://news.mit.edu/2026/mit-scientists-investigate-memorization-risk-clinical-ai-0105

3. Carlini, N., Tramer, F., Wallace, E., et al. “Extracting Training Data from Large Language Models.” USENIX Security 2021. https://www.usenix.org/conference/usenixsecurity21/presentation/carlini-extracting

4. Nasr, M., Carlini, N., Hayase, J., et al. “Scalable Extraction of Training Data from (Production) Language Models.” arXiv:2311.17035, 2023. https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.17035

5. Sweeney, L. “Simple Demographics Often Identify People Uniquely.” Carnegie Mellon University, Data Privacy Working Paper 3, 2000. https://dataprivacylab.org/people/sweeney/work/index.html

6. Sweeney, L. “Risks to Patient Privacy: A Re-identification of Patients in Maine and Vermont Statewide Hospital Data.” Technology Science, 2018. https://techscience.org/a/2018100901/

7. PMC. “Addressing contemporary threats in anonymised healthcare data using privacy engineering.” 2025. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11885643/

8. Springer Nature. “What is the patient re-identification risk from using de-identified clinical free text data for health research?” AI and Ethics, 2025. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43681-025-00681-0

9. HIPAA Journal. “Healthcare Data Breach Statistics.” https://www.hipaajournal.com/healthcare-data-breach-statistics/

10. UnitedHealth Group. “UnitedHealth Group Updates on Change Healthcare Cyberattack.” April 22, 2024. https://www.unitedhealthgroup.com/newsroom/2024/2024-04-22-uhg-updates-on-change-healthcare-cyberattack.html

11. HHS. “Changes Proposed to Strengthen HIPAA Security Rule.” January 2025. https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/special-topics/de-identification/index.html

12. Reed Smith. “The EU AI Act and Medical Devices: Navigating High-Risk Compliance.” 2025. https://www.reedsmith.com/our-insights/blogs/viewpoints/102kq35/the-eu-ai-act-and-medical-devices-navigating-high-risk-compliance/

13. European Commission. “Medical Devices Joint Artificial Intelligence Board, MDCG 2025-6.” 2025. https://health.ec.europa.eu/document/download/b78a17d7-e3cd-4943-851d-e02a2f22bbb4_en

14. Health Affairs Forefront. “Unlearning In Medical AI: A New Frontier For Privacy, Regulation, And Trust.” 2025. https://www.healthaffairs.org/content/forefront/unlearning-medical-ai-new-frontier-privacy-regulation-and-trust

15. MICCAI 2025. “Forget-MI: Machine Unlearning for Forgetting Multimodal Information in Healthcare Settings.” https://arxiv.org/html/2506.23145

16. MedForget. “MedForget: Hierarchy-Aware Multimodal Unlearning Testbed for Medical AI.” December 2025. https://arxiv.org/html/2512.09867v1

17. Nature Medicine. “Medical large language models are vulnerable to data-poisoning attacks.” January 2025. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-024-03445-1

18. Becker's Hospital Review. “EHR-trained AI could compromise patient privacy: MIT.” 2026. https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/healthcare-information-technology/ai/ehr-trained-ai-could-compromise-patient-privacy-mit/

19. Cobalt. “Healthcare Data Breach 2025 Statistics.” https://www.cobalt.io/blog/healthcare-data-breach-statistics

20. NIST AI Risk Management Framework. https://www.nist.gov/artificial-intelligence/ai-risk-management-framework

---

Tim Green UK-based Systems Theorist & Independent Technology Writer

Tim explores the intersections of artificial intelligence, decentralised cognition, and posthuman ethics. His work, published at smarterarticles.co.uk, challenges dominant narratives of technological progress while proposing interdisciplinary frameworks for collective intelligence and digital stewardship.

His writing has been featured on Ground News and shared by independent researchers across both academic and technological communities.

ORCID: 0009-0002-0156-9795 Email: tim@smarterarticles.co.uk

In Summary: * After watching one baseball game and two basketball games on TV earlier today, I'll spend Sunday evening with my Radio. Listening now to 1200 WOAI, the flagship station for the San Antonio Spurs, for pregame coverage then the call of tonight's game vs. the Houston Rockets.

Prayers, etc.: * I have a daily prayer regimen I try to follow throughout the day from early morning, as soon as I roll out of bed, until head hits pillow at night. Details of that regimen are linked to my link tree, which is linked to my profile page here.

Starting Ash Wednesday, 2026, I've added this daily prayer as part of the Prayer Crusade Preceding the 2026 SSPX Episcopal Consecrations.

Health Metrics: * bw= 230.49 lbs * bp= 155/92 (63)

Exercise: * morning stretches, balance exercises, kegel pelvic floor exercises, half squats, calf raises, wall push-ups

Diet: * 06:00 – 1 banana * 07:40 – rice cake * 09:50 – garden salad * 10:00 – home made fruit roll-ups (munched on throughout the day) * 12:45 – bowl of cooked meat (liver, tongue, sausage, pork, etc.) and vegetables * 15:30 – 1 fresh apple

Activities, Chores, etc.: * 06:10 – bank accounts activity monitored * 06:25 – read, write, pray, follow news reports from various sources, surf the socials, and nap * 11:00 – watch the World Baseball Classic, Netherlands vs Dominican Republic * 14:00 – watch college basketball, Illinois at Maryland * 16:00 – more college basketball, Iowa at Nebraska * 18:00 – San Antonio Spurs Pregame Coverage * 19:00 – listening to the radio call of tonight's Houston Rockets vs. San Antonio Spurs game

Chess: * 08:55 – moved in all pending CC games

Human history is filled with people who chased more. More wealth, more recognition, more comfort, more security, more influence, more achievement, more control. The desire to grow, expand, and improve is not wrong in itself. In fact, the desire for growth is deeply embedded within the human soul. It is part of the divine spark placed within every person by God, a quiet internal signal reminding us that we were created for something meaningful, something impactful, something larger than our own survival. Yet millions of people discover a strange and frustrating reality as they pursue success. The harder they chase fulfillment through accumulation and self-advancement, the more elusive that fulfillment becomes. Achievements arrive, milestones are reached, goals are checked off, and yet something inside remains strangely unsatisfied. This paradox sits at the center of the human experience. The world teaches that fulfillment comes from gaining more, yet the deeper truths revealed through faith suggest that fulfillment often arrives when we begin giving more.

Every generation inherits the same cultural narrative. Success is defined by climbing higher than the people around you. Recognition is measured by how many people notice you. Value is often calculated by income, influence, or external validation. From an early age people are quietly trained to compare themselves to others, to compete for limited opportunities, and to believe that the ultimate goal of life is personal advancement. While competition can sharpen skills and motivate effort, it also creates a subtle trap. When success becomes centered entirely on personal gain, it disconnects the heart from its deeper purpose. A person may rise professionally and still feel spiritually empty. They may gain admiration and still feel internally restless. They may achieve everything they once dreamed of and still wake up wondering why the satisfaction they expected never fully arrived. This quiet dissatisfaction is not a failure of ambition. It is often a signal pointing toward a deeper truth about the nature of fulfillment.

The teachings of Jesus reveal a radically different model for success than the one most cultures promote. Instead of building a life focused primarily on personal gain, Jesus repeatedly emphasized service, compassion, generosity, humility, and love. These values were not presented as moral suggestions designed merely to make society function better. They were presented as fundamental principles that unlock the deepest levels of human purpose. When Jesus taught that those who seek to save their life will lose it, but those who lose their life for a greater purpose will find it, he was describing a profound spiritual paradox that continues to shape human lives thousands of years later. The path to true fulfillment does not always run through self-advancement. Often it runs through service to others, through acts of compassion, through lifting people who cannot repay you, through investing your energy in something that benefits lives beyond your own.

Modern psychology has begun to uncover truths that echo what the teachings of Jesus revealed long ago. Research into human happiness repeatedly shows that individuals who orient their lives around purpose and service experience deeper long-term fulfillment than those who focus primarily on self-centered achievement. People who volunteer, mentor others, support their communities, and contribute to causes greater than themselves consistently report higher levels of life satisfaction. The reason for this may lie in how human beings were designed. The human brain releases powerful chemicals such as dopamine, oxytocin, and serotonin when acts of kindness and generosity occur. These biological responses reinforce behaviors that strengthen social bonds and cooperative communities. In other words, the human body itself appears wired to reward service and connection. The pursuit of meaning activates something deeper within us than the pursuit of status alone.

Many people who feel unfulfilled are not failing because they lack discipline or ambition. They are often following a blueprint that was incomplete from the beginning. The modern world celebrates productivity, efficiency, and relentless forward momentum, but rarely stops to ask an important question. Forward toward what? Without a meaningful destination, even the fastest progress can leave a person feeling lost. A life focused only on personal advancement can become like climbing a ladder that was leaning against the wrong wall. The climb may require enormous effort and skill, yet the view at the top may not provide the satisfaction that was expected. This realization can be deeply unsettling for those who have invested years chasing goals that promised fulfillment but delivered only temporary excitement.

The message of service does not mean abandoning ambition or refusing to grow. Growth remains essential to the human journey. The difference lies in how growth is directed. When personal growth becomes connected to improving the lives of others, ambition transforms into purpose. Instead of asking how high one person can climb, the question shifts toward how many people can rise together. This shift may appear subtle on the surface, but it completely transforms the internal experience of success. Achievement becomes more meaningful when it carries the weight of contribution. Progress becomes more satisfying when it creates positive change beyond personal benefit.

The world often frames life as a competition between individuals, but the deeper truth revealed throughout scripture suggests that humanity was designed to function more like a living body. In a healthy body every part contributes to the well-being of the whole. The strength of one area supports the stability of another. When one part suffers, the entire system feels the impact. When one part thrives, the entire system benefits. This metaphor illustrates an important spiritual principle. Individual lives gain deeper significance when they become connected to something greater than themselves. Service becomes the bridge that connects personal potential to collective good.

One of the most remarkable aspects of service is how it transforms the person who gives. When people focus solely on their own advancement, every obstacle can feel like a personal attack on their progress. Delays become frustrating, setbacks feel humiliating, and competition begins to create anxiety. Yet when someone dedicates their life to serving others, the emotional landscape begins to shift. Challenges still exist, but they take on a different meaning. Difficulties become opportunities to help others overcome similar struggles. Success becomes something that can be shared rather than guarded. Life begins to feel less like a constant battle for position and more like a meaningful journey with a purpose larger than personal recognition.

Throughout history many of the individuals who left the deepest impact on humanity were not those who simply accumulated the most power or wealth. They were those who gave themselves to something greater than personal advancement. Their lives became vessels through which compassion, courage, faith, and service reached others. Their influence expanded not because they chased attention, but because they invested their energy in lifting others. Their legacy endured because service multiplies impact far beyond what individual ambition can achieve alone.

The desire for more that so many people feel is not necessarily wrong. In many cases it is actually pointing toward a deeper calling. The problem arises when that desire is interpreted only through the lens of personal gain. The longing for more meaning, more connection, more purpose, and more significance is often the soul's way of guiding a person toward a life that contributes to something greater than their own success story. When that inner longing is redirected toward service, something powerful begins to unfold. The restless energy that once chased personal validation begins to fuel acts of contribution. The desire for significance becomes the motivation to create positive change in the lives of others.

This transformation does not require grand gestures or global influence. Some of the most powerful acts of service occur quietly in everyday life. A conversation that restores hope to someone who was losing faith in themselves. A moment of encouragement that changes the direction of another person's day. A willingness to listen when someone feels invisible. A commitment to support others even when recognition is unlikely. These moments may appear small from the outside, yet their impact can ripple through lives in ways that are impossible to fully measure.

Service also changes the way people view success. When success is defined only by personal gain, the number of winners remains limited. Someone else's victory can feel like a personal loss. Yet when success becomes tied to helping others grow, opportunities for fulfillment expand dramatically. Every life touched becomes a new source of meaning. Every person helped becomes a reminder that one's efforts matter. Fulfillment begins to multiply because the measure of success expands beyond individual achievement.

This principle becomes especially powerful when applied to personal growth. Many people pursue self-improvement as a way to gain an advantage over others. They develop skills, expand knowledge, and cultivate discipline primarily to improve their own position in life. While these efforts can produce results, they often leave a lingering sense of isolation. Growth becomes more fulfilling when it is pursued not just for personal benefit but also for the purpose of serving others more effectively. Knowledge becomes a tool for guidance. Strength becomes a resource for protection. Wisdom becomes a gift that can illuminate the path for others.

Faith adds another layer of depth to this understanding. The teachings of Jesus consistently highlight the idea that the greatest among people are those who choose to serve. This message challenges the conventional understanding of power and significance. In a world that often celebrates dominance and control, Jesus introduced a model of leadership rooted in humility and compassion. The example set through his life demonstrates that true influence does not arise from demanding recognition but from demonstrating love through action.

Many individuals searching for fulfillment are actually standing at the threshold of a profound shift in perspective. The dissatisfaction they feel is not necessarily a sign that they are failing. It may be a signal that the path they have been following is incomplete. When people begin exploring how their talents, experiences, and passions can benefit others, a deeper sense of meaning often emerges. Life begins to feel less like a series of personal objectives and more like a meaningful mission.

This shift in perspective can change how daily life is experienced. Work becomes more than a paycheck when it is seen as an opportunity to serve others through one's abilities. Relationships become richer when they are approached with the intention of uplifting and supporting one another. Personal growth becomes more rewarding when it equips someone to contribute more effectively to the world around them. Even ordinary moments can take on deeper meaning when they are viewed through the lens of service.

The paradox that emerges from this understanding is both simple and profound. The more a person focuses on serving others, the more fulfillment they often experience themselves. The more they invest in lifting others, the more their own life gains purpose. The more they contribute to the well-being of others, the more their own sense of significance expands. This paradox challenges the assumptions that dominate much of modern culture, yet it aligns with truths that have guided spiritual wisdom for centuries.

The journey toward fulfillment does not require abandoning ambition, dreams, or personal growth. It requires aligning those pursuits with a purpose that reaches beyond individual gain. When ambition becomes connected to service, dreams gain a deeper dimension. Achievements become more meaningful because they create value for others. Success becomes richer because it carries the weight of positive impact.

Many people spend years chasing fulfillment without realizing that the key to unlocking it may lie in a simple but powerful shift in perspective. Instead of asking how life can provide more for them, they begin asking how they can provide more for life. Instead of measuring success only by what they accumulate, they begin measuring it by what they contribute. Instead of focusing solely on personal advancement, they begin exploring how their journey can elevate others.

This shift does not diminish personal success. In many cases it amplifies it. When people dedicate themselves to creating value for others, opportunities often expand naturally. Trust grows, influence deepens, and relationships strengthen. Service builds connections that competition alone cannot create. The desire to help others succeed often leads to networks of mutual support that open doors far beyond what isolated ambition could achieve.

As individuals begin to embrace the deeper meaning of service, something remarkable starts to change inside them. The restless hunger that once drove them to chase constant external validation slowly begins to quiet. Instead of measuring their worth through comparison with others, they begin to experience the steady satisfaction that comes from contributing to something meaningful. This change does not happen overnight, nor does it eliminate every struggle or moment of doubt. Yet over time a subtle transformation begins to reshape how life feels on the inside. Instead of living under the pressure of constant self-evaluation, a person who serves discovers the freedom that comes from focusing outward. The world becomes less about proving personal value and more about expressing the value that already exists within them.

One of the greatest misunderstandings about service is the belief that it requires sacrificing personal growth or ambition. Many people imagine that dedicating themselves to helping others means setting aside their own dreams or accepting a life of limitation. In reality the opposite is often true. When a person's ambition becomes aligned with service, their drive gains a powerful new dimension. Instead of pursuing success purely for personal gain, their work begins to carry a deeper purpose. Their skills become tools that benefit others. Their knowledge becomes guidance that helps people navigate life more effectively. Their achievements create opportunities that extend beyond their own lives. Rather than shrinking ambition, service expands it into something far more meaningful.

The concept of a growth mindset plays a powerful role in this transformation. A growth mindset recognizes that abilities, wisdom, and strength are not fixed qualities but capacities that can develop through effort, learning, and experience. When someone views life through this lens, challenges become opportunities for expansion rather than threats to identity. Failures become teachers rather than verdicts. Progress becomes a lifelong journey rather than a destination that must be reached quickly. When this mindset is combined with a commitment to serving others, personal growth takes on a profound new purpose. Learning becomes a way to equip oneself to help others more effectively. Developing discipline becomes a way to model perseverance. Overcoming adversity becomes a story that inspires hope in those facing similar struggles.

The teachings of Jesus repeatedly emphasize that the true measure of a life is not found in status but in love expressed through action. Throughout the Gospels there are countless moments where the expectations of society are overturned. The powerful are reminded of the importance of humility. The overlooked are lifted into dignity. The values that dominate worldly systems are quietly reversed. Instead of glorifying dominance, Jesus highlights compassion. Instead of celebrating authority, he honors service. Instead of elevating pride, he demonstrates humility. These teachings challenge deeply ingrained cultural assumptions about success and significance. They reveal that the path to a meaningful life is not defined by how many people serve you but by how many people you choose to serve.

This idea becomes even more powerful when viewed through the lens of legacy. Every human life leaves behind a ripple of influence that extends far beyond what can be measured during a lifetime. Words spoken in kindness can echo through someone's memory for decades. Guidance offered at the right moment can alter the course of another person's future. Acts of compassion can restore hope in ways that cannot be quantified. When people dedicate themselves to serving others, their lives become part of a chain of influence that stretches across generations. A single act of encouragement can inspire someone who later goes on to inspire many more. In this way service creates a multiplying effect that extends far beyond what any individual could accomplish alone.

The world often celebrates visible achievements because they are easy to measure. Wealth can be counted. Titles can be displayed. Awards can be recognized publicly. Yet many of the most meaningful contributions in human history occurred quietly and without recognition. Parents shaping the character of their children. Teachers igniting curiosity in young minds. Mentors guiding others through difficult transitions. Friends offering support during moments of despair. These acts rarely receive headlines, yet they shape the fabric of society in ways that cannot be replaced by status or influence alone. The power of service lies in its ability to transform lives at the level where true change occurs.

There is also something deeply liberating about embracing a life oriented around service. When a person's sense of identity becomes tied entirely to personal achievement, they often live under constant pressure to maintain success. Every setback threatens their sense of worth. Every comparison with others can create anxiety. Yet when identity becomes connected to serving others, the emotional landscape shifts. Even small acts of kindness become meaningful victories. Even modest contributions become sources of satisfaction. Fulfillment no longer depends solely on extraordinary accomplishments but can be experienced through daily moments of compassion and generosity.

This perspective also helps people navigate one of the most difficult realities of life, which is the presence of suffering and hardship. Everyone eventually encounters moments when plans collapse, health struggles emerge, relationships fracture, or circumstances become overwhelming. When life is centered purely on personal advancement, these moments can feel devastating because they interrupt the pursuit of individual success. Yet when life is anchored in service, hardship can sometimes reveal unexpected opportunities to help others. Personal struggles often create empathy that allows someone to support others facing similar challenges. Pain can deepen compassion. Difficult experiences can transform into sources of wisdom that guide others through their darkest moments.

The human desire for significance is one of the most powerful forces driving behavior. People want to believe their lives matter. They want to feel that their presence has meaning beyond mere existence. Many attempt to satisfy this desire through recognition or status, hoping that public acknowledgment will confirm their importance. While recognition can feel rewarding in the moment, it often fades quickly. The deeper sense of significance that many people long for tends to arise when their actions positively affect the lives of others. Knowing that something you did helped another person stand stronger in the world carries a satisfaction that external praise rarely matches.

As this understanding deepens, individuals begin to recognize that service does not diminish their own life. Instead it enriches it. The more a person contributes to the well-being of others, the more connected they feel to the larger human story unfolding around them. Life begins to feel less isolated and more interwoven with the journeys of others. Moments that once felt ordinary begin to carry deeper meaning because they are connected to acts of kindness, encouragement, and support.

Faith adds another powerful layer to this understanding. When believers view their lives through the lens of divine purpose, service becomes more than a moral choice. It becomes a reflection of the character of God expressed through human action. The teachings of Jesus reveal a God who consistently moves toward humanity with compassion, grace, and love. When individuals choose to serve others, they participate in that same movement of love flowing outward into the world. Their actions become part of a larger spiritual narrative in which kindness, generosity, and mercy gradually reshape the human experience.

This perspective also reframes the concept of success. Instead of asking how much someone has gained personally, the question becomes how much good their life has produced in the lives of others. Influence becomes measured not only by visibility but by the depth of transformation it creates. A single life dedicated to service can ignite countless other lives, each carrying forward the same spirit of compassion and generosity.

Many people who eventually embrace this mindset describe a profound sense of peace that emerges as they shift their focus away from constant self-centered striving. The pressure to prove oneself begins to fade. The fear of falling behind others becomes less important. The endless race for recognition loses its grip on the heart. In its place grows a quieter but far more enduring form of satisfaction. Each day becomes an opportunity to contribute something meaningful to the world, whether through encouragement, guidance, generosity, or simple presence.

The idea that fulfillment grows through service may seem counterintuitive in a culture that celebrates individual achievement above all else. Yet countless lives throughout history demonstrate the truth of this principle. People who dedicate themselves to lifting others often discover that their own lives become richer, deeper, and more meaningful in the process. Their sense of purpose expands. Their relationships grow stronger. Their inner life becomes anchored in something more stable than the shifting standards of public recognition.

The call to rise and create lasting impact does not require extraordinary circumstances. It begins with the simple decision to live with intention. Every day presents opportunities to offer encouragement, to share wisdom, to extend compassion, to stand beside those who are struggling, and to contribute something valuable to the lives of others. These actions accumulate over time, gradually shaping a life that carries genuine significance.

When people begin to understand this deeper truth, the question of fulfillment starts to answer itself. The feeling of emptiness that often accompanies relentless self-centered pursuit begins to dissolve as life becomes connected to a greater purpose. Instead of chasing satisfaction through accumulation, individuals begin to experience the quiet joy that arises from contribution. Instead of measuring success solely by what they receive, they begin measuring it by what they give.

This transformation does not eliminate ambition or the desire for progress. Instead it refines those desires so that they serve a higher purpose. Growth becomes a tool for contribution. Achievement becomes a platform for influence that benefits others. Personal success becomes meaningful because it creates opportunities to help others rise as well.

The world does not need more people chasing recognition at the expense of connection. It needs individuals who understand that true strength often reveals itself through service. It needs leaders who measure success by how many lives they uplift rather than how much attention they command. It needs voices that remind others that fulfillment is not found at the end of endless accumulation but along the path of meaningful contribution.

The journey toward a purpose-driven life begins with a simple realization. The fulfillment you have been chasing may not be waiting at the next milestone of personal success. It may be waiting in the lives you choose to impact along the way. When people shift their focus from gaining more to giving more, they often discover that life begins to feel fuller than they ever imagined possible. The paradox becomes clear. The life that gives the most ultimately becomes the life that gains the most in return.

Your friend, Douglas Vandergraph

Watch Douglas Vandergraph’s inspiring faith-based videos on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@douglasvandergraph

Support the ministry by buying Douglas a coffee: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/douglasvandergraph

Donations to help keep this Ministry active daily can be mailed to:

Douglas Vandergraph Po Box 271154 Fort Collins, Colorado 80527

The grounds of St. Clare House are a messy mix of leftover snow, ice, and newly formed mud, as the late winter sunshine begins the transformation of the ground. It’s far too early for other signs of impending spring like snow blossoming flowers or buds on trees and shrubs. Rather it’s a squishy, slippery work in progress. Early today a couple of us cleared the mound of snow and ice from the back porch. There was chopping, scraping, and heaving. It was a pretty good workout.

This landscape makes for a pretty powerful Lentscape. We are most definitely not in Spring. At the same time, the warmer air tells me we’re not precisely in Winter either. We’re somewhere in between. The preparatory and penitential seasons of the liturgical calendar tend to work this way. Definitely not the festival or season we’ve left behind, certainly not the upcoming feast either.

Rather, we experience the melt, the sogginess, the mush, and the necessity of getting rid of what needs to go, and the reality that only patient presence will get us through this transition. This can be hard, especially with the last of the roof-bound ice and snow crashing down, the large, lazy puddles, the mind’s desire to race ahead and begin projects and preparations on a ground that is nowhere close to ready.

To say nothing of the longing to escape into the gardens or the earth-keeping as the news of war, rumors of bigger war, and calamities of growing proportion keep crashing down like that stubborn ice. Even so, we remain caught up in the present moment, with all of the very real and uncertain things that are swirling about. If a part of Lent is preparing to bear witness to the suffering and violence of the crucifixion, and in contrast God’s enduring love, then we have plenty of crucified neighbors, neighborhoods, and far-flung members of the human family who are giving us the opportunity to prepare our hearts and hands for both witness and loving action.

Let us attend during this season of change, some slower than we want, some faster than we can keep up with, to the unique gift of each moment. As we discern what is ours to do in the midst of mud and ice, seeking the well-being of our neighbors and the earth, we have an amazing opportunity to still be mindfully and heartfully attentive when the next sign of new life emerges.

Hello I have been talking to some friends It’s the modern miracle of science to see these faces through the screen

And anyway we were talking about separation of intent from outcome

And I thought of this line from Kamelot ”Soul Society” from ”The Black Halo” album, (which is my favourite even though my favourite song ”The Spell” is from ”Karma”)

How could I be condemned for the things that I've done  If my intentions were good?

and yes this is food for thought of course it is. Of course it is. Intenttions are all we have on the one hand: the outcome is never given, because we can only guess how it will pan out. The point is, that we should make these educated guesses and also ensure that intention and outcome walk hand in hand

But that is beside the point

The point is I once in listened to ”The Spell” (and Karma) on a burned CD which was in my friend’s black saab 9000 turbo with black leather upholstery, we were going to the gas station in the middle of the night to buy snacks for we were playing Heroes of Might and Magic: II, but were out of snacks, and so when I sat there on the passenger’s seat and my friend was speeding and this song came on and never in my life have I ever felt as cool as I did then.

Then years pass and this memory faded until I heard the Karma album many years later and I thought this is the bomb and so I listened to all of these Kamelot albums until I rediscovered Karma and The Spell and then I was a more complete human being with this aforementioned memory sitting like a black diamond on my metaphorical crown.

Did you know Roy Khan the singer (then) of Kamelot is from Norway?

Outside in places the sidewalks are dry and the gravel on there redundant, but it’s mostly wet, because the snow and ice are melting and the meltwater on the salted roads run like tears, and the trees all seem dead for now but everybody knows it’s just a matter of time til there will be green buds all over them!

And of course one day I will wake up to half a meter of dirty snow and sleet and there will be ice, just when you think about planting tomatoes, but even so, it will still be under the spring sun and sky and that’s really comforting

And I have many friends and family and they come too like spring suns and they make my life worth living

And there will grow dandelions in the cracks of the asphalt and there will be once again butterflies outside

And I feel th

So yesterday, I went to a Hatsune Miku convention. And I think I found my people. At first, it was complete sensory overload because of all the bright turquoise cosplays, all various versions of Miku: Minecraft Miku, Furry Miku, and many many normal Mikus. It was insanity and I found myself laughing internally at the people walking by, thinking about how ridiculous and absurd this situation was. Then I watched some vocaloid idol performances, which featured a bunch of cosplayers donning their best Miku outfits and dancing (badly) to Miku vocaloid songs. I wouldn't do much better, but I do think the focus was more on the cosplay aspect than the dancing aspect, which is fair. If you're working a day job to earn money in this economy and then practicing cosplay and Miku dances, I'm not setting a high bar for your performances. I'm just happy you showed up and gave it your all.

More and more, I felt my derisive, ironic mental safeguards fall as I looked at the people around me and realized nobody was doing this for the lulz, or for shits and giggles. They could have been, but nobody was making fun of each other for liking something which is often so looked down on by “normal” people. Their love for Miku was so pure that I couldn't make fun of them anymore.

With that thought in my head, I went to the bathroom, and changed into a shitty Miku costume I bought on Amazon, and watched the performances without talking to a single soul. I should've talked to more people, I know but, the the performances were pretty cool: bands performing vocaloid music (props, that shit is hard as fuck to play and sing live), and people were dancing to Miku songs. I bought an acryllic of an office lady Teto sitting on a rolling desk chair with a cig in her hand, thinking that I was accumulating an alarming amount of anime paneraphilia in my apartment.

I bought the Miku costume and tried it at first because of I just had always wanted to try these things, and I was like, I'd better explore this before I regret it. I knew I wanted to try it, and I hate feeling restricted by societal standards or whatever else. I love to be free. So I did it, praying in my heart to God, “I know this looks and seems extremely sexually deviant, and if it is, show me, and if isn't, I'll know more about myself.” So I did it, and I was pleased to find that I was able to do it, without any feeling of arousal or weird thoughts like that. It was more so like, “This is fun, haha.” And that was pretty much the end of it. A fuckton of people around me being dressed up in the same way helped with that too.

It took me a good while, but I also found my heart opening up to these people. I consider myself such a freak that I probably will never be accepted by normal people. But these people were so pure in the expression of their freak that I felt right at home among them. These kinds of places are great places for the exiles of society to hang out, because the concept of cringe doesn't exist in these spaces. Everything goes as long as nobody's hurting each other. We are all in love with a virtual singer that doesn't, has never, and never will exist, and listening to a bunch of songs that, if you started playing it around most people, they would yell at you to turn that shit off.

So I realized that I want to hang out with these people more and ditch the people in my life I don't think could accept me for the person I am. I didn't feel like I needed to hide my niche interests with these people because we are all niche and happen to like the same thing. It was a wonderful thing.

Then the next day, I went to service at a Korean church, which is a completely different environment. The people here could never accept me for who I am. And that's a fact. Showing someone here a photo of me cosplaying Miku would be equivalent to social suicide. People would be shocked, and probably either disgusted or concerned. This is why I'm trying to go to more in-person events nowadays in a desperate attempt to widen my circle. In-person interaction, meeting with new people is such a magical thing, and opens doors you didn't even know existed.

The sermon today was about how Jesus's revival opens new doors for humanity that didn't exist before. The main points I took away from the sermon was the following

1. Love for God isn't an emotional attraction thing, we cannot love God without knowing Him more. And to know Him means that you need to dive completely into Him, giving Him your all. Knowing Him is not an intellectual act. It is more spiritual in nature.

2. Our ability to live a God-based life where we are in love with Him and is pleasing to us is based on the two factors, which work in tandem together.

   1. God's grace given to us freely through Jesus's death on the cross (not our doing)

   2. Our acceptance, reciprocation, and giving the entirety of yourself up to God (our free will)

I found myself questioning whether God would take away everything I ever liked, like my fascination/obsession with all things virtual (like vocaloid), or an interesting avenue of self-expression I found named cosplay. I found it so hard to wrest those things from my grasp, but then I was reminded of some things once again.

1. There is no meaning apart from God. This is to say, there is no life worth living apart from God. There is this hollowness that follows a life lived without God, that cannot be filled. When you are in God, you will not have the dopamine-induced fever dream life of pleasure you had before, but you can be sure that hole will be filled. It's more boring, but there's more sustainable fun in it. Having ventured down that hole many times, I do want to place my time, energy, resources, everything I have in something that is eternally meaningful, and not just a trifle.

2. I find it difficult to engage with church communities because freaks like me are often rejected from these places. While I need people that accept me for who I am, there is no group of people or person that is perfect, and what matters in the end is God's acceptance and love for you that exists no matter who you are.

So I decided once again to give myself up to God, and cultivate in my heart the things of God. And to do this, I just need to pray and read the Bible. What you consume is often what you cultivate, just like that feeding two wolves Native American parable.

During the season of Lent this year which has already started – March 5th to April 17th. I want to, every single day, read the Bible and pray for a combined period of 30 minutes per day. No matter what happens, I will do that. Starting today.

Photos: Former U.S. Capitol and D.C. Metropolitan Police officers wounded during the 6 Jan. 2021 attack on the Capitol. Top to bottom — Harry Dunn, Michael Fanone, Aquilino Gonell, and Daniel Hodges (A. Kotok). All images are available at the Alamy agency.

A memorial plaque honoring police officers wounded during the 6 Jan. 2021 mob attack on the U.S. Capitol was installed on the building’s west front side on Saturday 7 Mar. at 4:00 am. Olivia George, a Washington Post reporter, witnessed the installation after its authorization three years earlier.

George’s story in the Post notes Congress mandated a commemorative plaque in Mar. 2022, for installation within a year. George says artists created the plaque, but it remained in storage under orders from Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-LA), who supervises the Capitol architect, the office responsible for building maintenance.

Harry Dunn, one of the officers hurt in the attack, sued to have the plaque installed, and the Senate in Jan. 2026 gave unanimous consent for the installation. George says, “There was no announcement, no ceremony, no news cameras — just two employees on their routine overnight shift working while most of Washington slept.”

We photo’d Dunn and three other officers wounded in the attack who spoke at a “January 6, Five Years Later” program at the National Press Club. TechNewsLit Explores reported on the program on 8 Jan. Those photos, shown above, are available from the TechNewsLit portfolio at the Alamy agency.

Copyright © Technology News and Literature. All rights reserved.